Translator Disclaimer
29 September 2020 Ants Tend Ghost Orchids: Patrolling of Dendrophylax lindenii (Orchidaceae) by Crematogaster ashmeadi in Florida
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Myriad symbioses exist between insects and orchids, especially in tropical forests where the majority of species are epiphytic. Relationships between ants and rare epiphytic orchids are underrepresented in the scientific literature. The natural history and ecological entomology of Florida's endangered and epiphytic ghost orchid, Dendrophylax lindenii (Lindley) Bentham ex Rolfe (Orchidaceae), remain limited. Widely recognized for long-standing hypotheses concerning the species' pollination ecology, that documentation recently overturned, other interactions between insects and ghost orchids are scarce. Here we describe the first associations between ants, Crematogaster ashmeadi Mayr (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), and D. lindenii. Ghost orchid roots provide facultative and opportunistic structures for arboreal ants to use in nesting. Furthermore, excrement from ant colonies within the root mass can increase nutrient availability in the orchid's nutrient-poor substrate; the proximity of these ants permits patrolling to defend the plant and exert control over possible extra floral nectaries that require further inquiry. This study presents novel observations that expand the known insect associations with ghost orchids, elucidating the complex ecology of one of Florida's rarest and most endangered species.

Epiphytic plants occupy a prominent position in the research history of ant-plant mutualisms (Huxley 1980; Beattie 1985). This is likely due to the fact that epiphyte abundance and richness contribute to increased arthropod diversity in tropical tree canopies (Yanoviak et al. 2011) where arboreal ants are the dominant insect taxon (Wilson 1987). Early naturalists first noted the diversity and complexity of angiosperms that take root in arboreal ant nests and described the phenomenon of ant gardens: a flourishing of epiphytic plants associated with ant nests (Ule 1901). Benefits to the plants include the ants' waste products that provide nutrients (Huxley 1980), which enhance plant growth and production of flowers. Ant occupants regularly patrol host plants and defend them from herbivores (Jeffrey et al. 1970; Bentley 1977; Bronstein 1998), as well as aid in the harvest and dispersal of seeds. Ants benefit from this association by obtaining structural resources from epiphytes for nest construction, and often benefit from the sugary rewards from flowers or extra floral nectaries. The study of these complex interactions among ants and plants, and their role in the ecology of tropical forests, has emerged as a distinct field of inquiry. Some ant-plant associations are highly specialized, co-evolved mutualisms, but many are facultative and opportunistic associations taking advantage of available nutritional and structural resources (Fisher et al. 1990).

Orchids are among the most intriguing, diverse, and well-studied groups of epiphytes. Many of the approximately 25,000 species within the Orchidaceae produce sugary exudates through extra floral nectaries and contain cavities within living tissues suitable for nesting, both of which are attractive to ants. Relationships between ants and rare epiphytic orchids are underrepresented in the scientific literature because of the difficulty in documenting them: the partners are often small, inconspicuous, and interactions occur high in trees.

Florida's endangered ghost orchid, Dendrophylax lindenii (Lindley) Bentham ex Rolfe (Orchidaceae: Angraecinae), is one of the most widely recognized orchids in the world with only an estimated 2,000 individuals remaining in the wild. Studies of ghost orchids have investigated mycorrhizal relationships (Chomicki et al. 2014), host tree affinities (Mujica et al. 2009; Raventos et al. 2015), micropropagation (Hoang et al. 2016), and volatile compound composition (Sadler et al. 2011). Although few investigations have focused on insect associates, this orchid has generated significant publicity around the mystery of its pollination. Long standing hypotheses proposed that pollination in this species, with its long, elegant nectar spur, was carried out by a single, co-evolved mutualist (Houlihan 2018). This hypothesis was recently upended completely when the first images of hawkmoth pollinators disproved the previous hypothesis and suggested that multiple pollinator communities may be associated with D. lindenii (Houlihan et al. 2019). This discovery highlights how little has been documented about the ecological interactions between insects and ghost orchids, and how much more remains to be understood (Houlihan et al. 2019). Filling this gap in our understanding is an urgent need for efforts to conserve this species (Stewart & Kane 2007).

In the wild, D. lindenii do not always produce flowers annually; rather, clusters of nearby individuals appear to synchronize flowering years (M. O. unpublished data); this may enhance pollination success and seed pod production. Micropropagation experiments investigating the nutrient requirements of D. lindenii reveal that certain specific microhabitat conditions and mycorrhizal compositions generate spikes that induce flowering (Hoang et al. 2016). Although optimal environmental scenarios can be simulated in the laboratory, the availability of these nutrients does not exist in constant or regular abundance in the wild. After consecutive years of flower production, individual ghost orchids (and even entire slough clusters) often go dormant for a period of yr (P. R. H., M. O. unpublished data). This boom and bust cycle likely allows plants to reaccumulate nutrients depleted during flowering yr, ultimately improving pollination success. Here we describe a new association between D. lindenii and a native ant species, Crematogaster ashmeadi Mayr (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), from multiple observations over a 3 yr period. This is the first record of such a relationship in the Dendrophylax genus.

Fig. 1.

A ghost orchid, Dendrophylax lindenii, flower and bud in the flooded forests of Fakahatchee State Park, Florida. One of 2 individuals observed having an association with Crematogaster ashmeadi. A mosquito is seen resting on the labellum of the flower.

img-z2-7_369.jpg

Materials and Methods

Observations were conducted in the Fakahatchee Strand Preserve State Park in Collier County, Florida. The lowest part of the Everglades and Big Cypress basins in elevation, Fakahatchee is a unique subtropical strand forest, characterized by slow-flow, seasonally flooded sloughs that are dominated by pop ash (Fraxinus caroliniana Mill.; Oleaceae) and pond apple (Annona glabra L.; Annonaceae) the primary hosts in Florida for the epiphytic D. lindenii (Fig. 1). The presence of royal palms and bald cypress adds to the distinctiveness of these forests, as this sympatry is not found anywhere else in the world. Fakahatchee contains the highest diversity of orchids (> 49 spp.) and bromeliads in the USA.

Orchids were monitored from Jun 2014 through Jul 2017. During this time, 14 visits were made to Fakahatchee (varying in length from 1–8 d), totaling 47 d in the field and amounting to 423 h searching for and observing the orchids. A Canon XF205 HD infrared camera (Canon, Melville, New York, USA) was deployed to film flowers for 10 h overnight on 20 separate nights, totaling 200 h of camera monitoring. The number of visits includes 6 trips during the winter when D. lindenii was not in flower, but field conditions permitted further exploration of the flooded forest in search of new individuals to monitor later in the yr during the flowering mo. A total of 124 individuals were located in Fakahatchee. This number includes individuals observed in remote sloughs that were occasionally explored opportunistically, but may not have been revisited during the course of the study. As the predominant focus of the study was initially on pollination (Houlihan et al. 2019), a select group of 14 orchids that reliably produced flowers annually during this period were monitored most frequently. An additional 2 visits were made to Guanahacabibes National Park in western Cuba. During the first trip in Dec 2015, 12 orchids with flowers were monitored over the course of 5 d. On the following trip in early Jan 2017, more than 150 individuals were located in 3 d with only 1 in flower.

Ants on D. lindenii were first filmed and photographed from a distance of 2 to 3 m with a Canon 5DS SLR camera and Canon EF 100-400 mm USM ii lens (Canon, Melville, New York, USA). This permitted initial documentation without disturbing the ants and eliciting behavioral response to observer presence. A Canon EF 100 mm Macro lens was then used to record close up video on a tripod to document ant interactions with other ants and various parts of the orchid. Crematogaster ashmeadi was identified based on color, size, and collection locality (Mark Deyrup personal communication). Distinguishing this species from Crematogaster pinicola Deyrup & Cover (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) can be difficult because the 2 are morphologically indistinguishable; however, the former is often brownish rather than black when it occurs in wet or mesic areas. Voucher specimens were collected into 95% EtOH for morphological examination. Pinned voucher specimens were deposited in the Archbold Biological Station insect collection in Venus, Florida, USA.

Fig. 2.

Crematogaster ashmeadi emerge and return via cavities excavated beneath roots of Dendrophylax lindenii. Individuals make mandible contact with the roots.

img-z3-7_369.jpg

Results

Crematogaster ashmeadi was observed on D. lindenii on 2 separate occasions. In Sep 2016, multiple individuals of this species were observed on 1 ghost orchid, primarily on the root mass and a spike that contained a bud. Crematogaster ashmeadi individuals were observed again on a different plant of D. lindenii in Jul 2017 that had produced a bud.

Photos, videos, and direct field observations indicated that the ants were patrolling the orchid (Figs. 2, 3). Individuals moved in and out of a central point beneath the root mass, apparently in a cavity that appeared to have been excavated in the orchid's substrate (Fig. 2). In one case, a spider descended on a bud (Fig. 4) and began affixing a web to the sepals and labellum, possibly lured by the abundance of small prey, such as mosquitoes (Fig. 5), also attracted to flowers. Ant activity subsequently increased on the inflorescence and individuals dismantled the web, effectively removing the spider from the flower bud and leaving it to fall into the water below (Fig. 6).

Fig. 3.

An individual Crematogaster ashmeadi patrolling the roots of Dendrophylax lindenii.

img-z4-1_369.jpg

Fig. 4.

A spider of the Family Araneidae descends and begins constructing a web on a ghost orchid flower. The flowers are frequented by mosquitoes, which may be the target prey.

img-z4-8_369.jpg

Discussion

In nutrient poor tropical forests, epiphytic plants are known to benefit from relationships that enhance the suitability of substrates and availability of nutrients (Blüthgen et al. 2001). Ants are known to have facultative associations with orchids for: (1) structural support in construction of carton nests or usage of cavities for housing (Longino 1986); (2) extrafloral nectar (Fisher & Zimmerman 1988); and (3) dispersal of seeds in ant-gardens (Kaufmann & Maschwitz 2006).

In our study, C. ashmeadi was observed only on developing inflorescences of D. lindenii with buds (Figs. 2, 3, 6), suggesting the possibility of extra floral nectaries on those structures and spikes, or a possible role of volatile compounds. Extrafloral nectaries contribute to the greatest number of ant-orchid associations (Fisher 1992) that can occur on nearly all orchid structures, and secrete nectar from glands on developing inflorescences, shoots, buds, and fruits (Marazzi et al. 2013). Furthermore, biotic and abiotic factors influence extra floral nectary production in the wild, which can strongly affect ant-plant interactions in situ (Jones et al. 2017). In a floristic study of the Everglades of southern Florida (Koptur 1992), 9% of species (78 of 851 spp.) were reported to contain extra floral nectaries. Although D. lindenii was not one of the 9 orchid species identified with extra floral nectaries, that study did not state if this orchid was assessed. However, we believe that this species was not present because the primary focus of investigations were carried out in Everglades pineland and sawgrass prairie habitats rather than flooded forests characteristic of D. lindenii in the Big Cypress Basin. Indeed, Hoang et al. (2016) dissected numerous D. lindenii for anatomical studies that were germinated from southern Florida seeds and did not identify extrafloral nectaries on the stem, root, or leaf primordia (N. H. Hoang personal communication). The study of extra floral nectaries within flooded forest habitats remains limited (Koptur 1992). Based on observations of mandible prodding of roots by ants in our study (Fig. 3), root masses warrant further inspection for possible secretions. As stated earlier, it is possible also that volatiles, rather than extra floral nectaries, play a role in attracting ants to this orchid (Willmer et al. 2009).

Fig. 5.

A mosquito, Aedes taeniorhynchus, rests on a Dendrophylax lindenii flower. This is a common occurrence that may indicate insect attraction to volatile compounds emitted by the orchid, and also potential prey for ambush predators on its flowers.

img-z5-1_369.jpg

While extra floral nectaries remain uncertain for D. lindenii, the root structure provides an opportunistic haven for C. ashmeadi (Fig. 2). The 2 instances of ant patrolling occurred in heavily flooded sloughs of the Fakahatchee Strand where tree trunks are isolated by water 1 to 2 m in depth. Ants had excavated cavities in the bark behind root structures affixed to the host tree, A. glabra, which has been observed elsewhere in this tree species with epiphytic orchids and Crematogaster ants. In Panama, A. glabra has been found to host 49 ant species, with a predicted ant species richness of 56 to 71; of these, 32 nested occasionally in an epiphytic orchid, Caularthron bilamellatum Hooker (Orchidaceae), most commonly inhabited by Crematogaster spp. (Yanoviak et al. 2011).

To our knowledge, generation of volatile compounds produced by ant-gardens or carton nests have not been studied as potential supplemental attractants to pollinators. Nocturnal Lepidoptera are known to be attracted to and associate with ants (Sourakov & Houlihan 2017), and a recent study documenting orchid seed dispersal and preferential seed removal by epiphytic ant gardens in the Americas provides novel insight into a poorly understood field of orchid ecology (Morales-Linares et al. 2018). Pollination ecology of many sphingophilous flowers, remains understudied (Houlihan et al. 2019), particularly in tropical swamp forests where Lepidoptera diversity often is relatively lower than other tropical forest habitats (Houlihan et al. 2013). Pollination success and fertilization of D. lindenii is exceptionally low, with only a few individuals producing seed pods within Fakahatchee's population each yr. Further observations of pollinated D. lindenii individuals are required to assess facultative ant gardening, which could be confirmed if seed pod production is significantly higher in individuals of D. lindenii that associate with ants than those that do not and subsequent seed dispersal.

Fig. 6.

Upon the arrival of the spider previously shown in Figure 3 of a ghost orchid flower, Crematogaster ants begin dismantling the web and ultimately remove the spider from the plant.

img-z6-1_369.jpg

Epiphytic orchids are likely to have many associations with ants yet to be documented. More research in this realm is necessary across orchid species to develop a comprehensive understanding of the diversity of ant-orchid symbioses. The benefit to D. lindenii of having regular ant tending may follow the model of ant-gardens, in that ant waste may increase nutrient availability in the nutrient-poor substrate of this tropical epiphytic orchid. Additionally ants may defend the plant against herbivores, as well as any potential deterrence to pollination, such as spider webs.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Geographic Society grant NGS/Waitt W318-14 to PRH, as well as the following to PRH: Presidential Graduate School Fellowship in Biology from University of Florida, the Fred Case Native Orchid Society Grant, 3 grants from the Lewis & Varina Vaughn Fellowship in Orchid Biology in the UF Department of Biology, and numerous grants from the Florida Biodiversity Foundation and International Biodiversity Foundation. Entomology equipment was generously sponsored by BioQuip Products, and gear for this fieldwork was provided by Patagonia. Research conducted in Fakahatchee Strand Preserve State Park was permitted by FPS Permit 05191414 and subsequent renewals, as well as FDACS DPI Permit #1275. PRH thanks Norris Williams and Mark Whitten for insightful conversation and feedback. The authors thank Mark Deyrup for assistance with identifications.

References Cited

1.

Bentley B. 1977. Extrafloral nectaries and protection by pugnacious bodyguards. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 8: 407–427. Google Scholar

2.

Beattie AJ. 1985. The evolutionary ecology of ant-plant mutualisms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom. Google Scholar

3.

Blüthgen N, Schmit-Neuerburg V, Engwald S, Barthlott W. 2001. Ants as epiphyte gardeners: comparing the nutrient quality of ant and termite canopy substrates in a Venezuelan lowland rain forest. Journal of Tropical Ecology 17: 887–894. Google Scholar

4.

Bronstein JL. 1998. The contribution of ant-plant protection studies to our understanding of mutualism. Biotropica 30: 150–161. Google Scholar

5.

Chomicki G, Bidel LP, Jay-Allemand C. 2014. Exodermis structure controls fungal invasion in the leafless epiphytic orchid Dendrophylax lindenii (Lindl.) Benth. ex Rolfe. Flora-Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants 209: 88–94. Google Scholar

6.

Fisher BL, Zimmerman JK. 1988. Ant/orchid associations in the Barro Colorado National Monument, Panama. Lindleyana 3: 12–16. Google Scholar

7.

Fisher BL, Sternberg LDSL, Price D. 1990. Variation in the use of orchid extrafloral nectar by ants. Oecologia 83: 263–266. Google Scholar

8.

Fisher BL. 1992. Facultative ant association benefits a Neotropical orchid. Journal of Tropical Ecology 8: 109–114. Google Scholar

9.

Hoang NH, Kane ME, Radcliffe EN, Zettler LW, Richardson LW. 2016. Comparative seed germination and seedling development of the ghost orchid, Dendrophylax lindenii (Orchidaceae), and molecular identification of its mycorrhizal fungus from South Florida. Annals of Botany: 119: 379–393. Google Scholar

10.

Houlihan PR. 2018. On the natural history of Darwin's orchids and pollination ecology by long tongued hawkmoths. Master's Thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA. Google Scholar

11.

Houlihan PR, Harrison ME, Cheyne SM. 2013. Impacts of forest gaps on butterfly diversity in a Bornean peat-swamp forest. Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology 16: 67–73. Google Scholar

12.

Houlihan PR, Stone M, Clem SE, Owen M, Emmel TC. 2019. Pollination ecology of Florida's endangered ghost orchid (Dendrophylax lindenii): a first description with new hypotheses for Darwin's orchids. Scientific Reports 9: 1–10. Google Scholar

13.

Huxley C. 1980. Symbiosis between ants and epiphytes. Biological Reviews 55: 321–340. Google Scholar

14.

Jeffrey DC, Arditti J, Koopowitz H. 1970. Sugar content in floral and extrafloral exudates of orchids: pollination, myrmecology and chemotaxonomy implication. New Phytologist 69: 187–195. Google Scholar

15.

Jones IM, Koptur S, Gallegos HR, Tardanico JP, Trainer PA, Peña J. 2017. Changing light conditions in pine rockland habitats affect the intensity and outcome of ant-plant interactions. Biotropica 49: 83–91. Google Scholar

16.

Kaufmann E, Maschwitz U. 2006. Ant-gardens of tropical Asian rainforests. Naturwissenschaften 93: 216. doi.org/10.1007/s00114-005-0081-y Google Scholar

17.

Koptur S. 1992. Plants with extrafloral nectaries and ants in Everglades habitats. Florida Entomologist 75: 38–50. Google Scholar

18.

Longino JT. 1986. Ants provide substrate for epiphytes. Selbyana 9: 100–103 Google Scholar

19.

Marazzi B, Bronstein JL, Koptur S. 2013. The diversity, ecology and evolution of extrafloral nectaries: current perspectives and future challenges. Annals of Botany 111: 1243–1250. Google Scholar

20.

Morales-Linares J, García-Franco JG, Flores-Palacios A, Valenzuela-González JE, Mata-Rosas M, Díaz-Castelazo C. 2018. Orchid seed removal by ants in Neotropical ant-gardens. Plant Biology 20: 525–530. Google Scholar

21.

Mújica E, Raventós J, González E. 2009. Análisis de la selección de sustrato por parte de Dendrophylax lindenii (Orchidaceae) en Cabo San Antonio, Península de Guanahacabibes, Pinar del Río, Cuba. Lankesteriana International Journal on Orchidology 9: 533–540. Google Scholar

22.

Raventós J, González E, Mújica E, Doak DF. 2015. Population viability analysis of the epiphytic ghost orchid (Dendrophylax lindenii) in Cuba. Biotropica 47: 179–189. Google Scholar

23.

Sadler JJ, Smith JM, Zettler LW, Alborn HT, Richardson LW. 2011. Fragrance composition of Dendrophylax lindenii (Orchidaceae) using a novel technique applied in situ. European Journal of Environmental Sciences 1: 137–141. Google Scholar

24.

Sourakov A, Houlihan PR. 2017. Note on nocturnal activity of a skipper, Pseudonascus paulliniae, in French Guiana. Tropical Lepidoptera Research 27: 26–27. Google Scholar

25.

Stewart SL, Kane ME. 2007. Orchid conservation in the Americas–lessons learned in Florida. Lankesteriana International Journal on Orchidology 7: 382–387. Google Scholar

26.

Ule E. 1901. Ameisengarten in Amazonasgebiet. Englers Botanische Jahrbucher 30 (Beibl. 68): 45–52. Google Scholar

27.

Willmer PG, Nuttman CV, Raine NE, Stone GN, Pattrick JG, Henson K, Stillman P, McIlroy L, Potts SG, Knudsen JT. 2009. Floral volatiles controlling ant behaviour. Functional Ecology 23: 888–900. Google Scholar

28.

Wilson EO. 1987. The arboreal ant fauna of Peruvian Amazon forest: a first assessment. Biotropica 19: 245–251. Google Scholar

29.

Yanoviak SP, Berghoff SM, Linsenmair KE, Zotz G. 2011. Effects of an epiphytic orchid on arboreal ant community structure in Panama. Biotropica 43: 731–737. Google Scholar
Peter R. Houlihan, Andrea Lucky, Mike Owen, and Thomas C. Emmel "Ants Tend Ghost Orchids: Patrolling of Dendrophylax lindenii (Orchidaceae) by Crematogaster ashmeadi in Florida," Florida Entomologist 103(3), 369-375, (29 September 2020). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.103.0309
Published: 29 September 2020
JOURNAL ARTICLE
7 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top