Translator Disclaimer
29 September 2020 Laboratory Rearing of Bagrada hilaris (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) under Quarantine Conditions in Florida, USA
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

There is a risk that Bagrada hilaris will be transported from the southwestern USA and establish in Florida where it could infest Brassica crops. Therefore, new rearing methods were developed to maintain a colony of B. hilaris under quarantine conditions to conduct research on the potential for this pest to become established in Florida. Dental wicks, cotton balls, and Kimwipes™ were evaluated as artificial oviposition substrates. Cotton balls were the preferred oviposition substrate by B. hilaris.

Bagrada hilaris (Burmeister) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) is an invasive stink bug from Africa that was discovered in California in 2008 and has since established in Arizona, Nevada, Utah, New Mexico, and Texas (Reed et al. 2013). Bagrada hilaris infests plants in the family Brassicaceae, including important crops like broccoli, cabbage, kale, and cauliflower, Brassica oleracea L. (Brassicaceae). Feeding by B. hilaris causes wilting, desiccation, and discoloration of the plants (Palumbo et al. 2016). This pest preferentially feeds on young plants, damaging the meristem, and later causing deformation or lack of formation of reproductive heads in broccoli and cauliflower (Palumbo & Natwick 2010). On average, the injury caused by B. hilaris has been 10 to 25%, although losses as high as 70% in direct seeded fields were reported (Reed et al. 2013). In 2017, fresh market green cabbage was considered the tenth most valuable crop for Florida, and severe economic losses could result from the establishment of B. hilaris (FDACS 2018).

Bagrada hilaris is 1 of 3 pests regulated under the Federally Recognized State Managed Phytosanitary Program (USDA 2015). Currently, B. hilaris is not established in Florida, but has been intercepted at agricultural interdiction stations on multiple occasions, indicating that pathways exist for its arrival to the state (S. Halbert, personal communication). Therefore, research is needed on the potential for B. hilaris to establish in Florida, and methods have been developed to maintain a colony under quarantine conditions.

In previous research, a non-quarantine colony was maintained at 25 °C, with a 14:10 h (L:D) photoperiod and undefined RH (Taylor et al. 2015). In another colony, B. hilaris had the greatest survival at 24 to 35 °C (Reed et al. 2017), although optimal survival of a different colony occurred at 22 to 25 °C and 54% RH (Singh & Malik 1993). Our colony was maintained by placing 4 dehumidifiers around the rearing room to provide 50 to 65% RH. The temperature was kept at 23 to 27 °C and monitored using 2 HOBO data loggers (Onset Computer Corporation, Bourne, Massachusetts, USA;  https://www.onsetcomp.com/). A fluorescent light (two 40 watt, 1.2 meter cool white lamps) was installed above the cages and a 14:10 h (L:D) photoperiod was maintained.

Bagrada hilaris has been reared successfully on potted plants or plant cuttings of Indian mustard, Brassica juncea (L.) Czern. (Brassicaceae) (Singh & Malik 1993); mesa pepperwort, Lepidium alyssoides A. Gray (Brassicaceae) (Taylor et al. 2014); cabbage, Brassica oleracea var. capitata L. (Brassicaceae) (Verma et al. 1993); and broccoli, Brassica oleracea var. italica Plenck (Brassicaceae) (Huang et al. 2014). In our colony, insects were fed a mixed diet of cabbage, B. oleracea var. capitata, and kale, Brassica oleracea var. sabellica L. (Brassicaceae), and reared in custom-made cages.

The stink bugs were reared in custom-made cages; the largest ones were made from 1-gal wide-mouth polyethylene terephthalate jars (25.6 cm H × 14.7 cm diam) (ULINE, Pleasant Prairie, Wisconsin, USA;  https://www.uline.com). Four 5 cm diam holes were cut into each jar at an equal distance around the sides and covered with off-white 150 × 150 mesh nylon netting secured with hot glue. Smaller cages were constructed from 6.7 cm high × 11.4 cm diam cylindrical plastic restaurant-style containers (Tupperware Corporation, Orlando, Florida, USA;  www.tupperwear.com). Four 5 cm diam holes were cut into each lid and covered with nylon mesh that was secured with hot glue. For additional security, all cages were placed inside a BugDorm-2120F Insect Tent (BD2120F, MegaView Science Co., Ltd., Taichung, Taiwan;  www.bugdorm.com).

Our colony was established with 214 insects collected on broccoli at the University of Arizona Agricultural Center in Yuma, Arizona, USA, in Jun 2016. The insects were maintained in the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry maximum security quarantine facility in Gainesville, Florida, USA. For colony maintenance, each of the large cages were lined with a folded paper towel, and 6 dental wicks (Dynarex, Orange-burg, New York, USA;  www.dynarex.com), 6 cotton balls (Publix, Lakeland, Florida, USA;  www.publix.com), and 2 KimTech Science™ Kimwipes™ (KimTech, Roswell, Georgia, USA;  www.kcprofessional.com) were added to each as oviposition substrates. A maximum of 15 pairs of males and females were contained in each large cage and provided with an approximately 180 cm2 kale leaf that was suspended from the top of the cage using an insect pin and 3 approximately 40 cm2 pieces of cabbage. The food and oviposition substrates were replaced every 3 to 4 d. A maximum of 100 eggs were extracted randomly from the substrates and placed onto a paper towel in the bottom of each small cage. Nymphs emerged from the eggs and were given half of a kale leaf and 2 pieces of cabbage (about 40 cm2 each). After reaching the third instar, nymphs were collected randomly and transferred to large cages with a maximum of 50 insects per cage. Following eclosion, the adults were sexed, sorted into new large cages with a 25:25 M:F ratio, and then returned in large cages to the insect tents.

Maintenance of the B. hilaris colony would be more efficient if the females oviposited on a substrate from which the eggs could be removed easily. In the field, females oviposit single eggs or small egg masses beneath the soil surface (Taylor et al. 2014) but it would be difficult to use soil as an oviposition substrate in the laboratory. Consequently, alternative oviposition substrates have been tested, including suspended cheesecloth strips (Taylor et al. 2015), wool (Atwal 1959), and paper towels (Reed et al. 2017). The purpose of this study was to evaluate artificial oviposition substrates for maintaining a B. hilaris colony in a quarantine facility.

For both no-choice and choice tests, 3 oviposition substrates were evaluated in a randomized block design: i.e., dental wicks, cotton balls, and Kimwipes™. In the no-choice test, 9 large adult cages were prepared, each containing food, 10 pairs of unmated male and female adult B. hilaris, and 1 of the oviposition substrates (Fig. 1). For this no-choice test, 3 cages of each substrate were tested for replication. Choice tests were performed similarly, but with 3 large adult cages testing all 3 oviposition substrates within the same cage. Standard rearing procedures were followed and cages were inspected visually for eggs until the last female died. In the choice test, 1 large adult cage was prepared as in the no-choice test but contained equal amounts of all 3 substrates (Fig. 1). Data was analyzed with R (R Project 2013) in RStudio (RStudio Team 2015) using an ANOVA and a Tukey HSD procedure in the Agricolae package to test the effect of substrate type on the number of eggs oviposited by female B. hilaris (Mendiburu 2020; Hothorn et al. 2008).

For the no-choice test, there was a significant effect of substrate type on the mean number of eggs oviposited by female B. hilaris (F = 7.981; df = 2; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between eggs oviposited on the cotton balls (n = 1,211) and the dental wicks (n = 1,029), but the number of eggs oviposited on cotton balls and dental wicks both were significantly greater than on Kimwipes™ (n = 320) (P < 0.001, P = 0.008, respectively) (Fig. 2). When given no choice, both cotton balls and dental wicks were adequate artificial oviposition substrates for B. hilaris.

Fig. 1.

Large cages for no-choice and choice tests for evaluating the preference of Bagrada hilaris for 3 artificial oviposition substrates: dental wicks, cotton balls, or Kimwipes.

img-z2-11_401.jpg

For the choice test, there was a significant effect of substrate on the mean number of eggs oviposited by female B. hilaris (F = 28.61; df = 2; P < 0.001). The number of eggs oviposited on the cotton balls (n = 1,573) was significantly greater than on the dental wicks (n = 141) and the Kimwipes™ (n = 13) (P < 0.001), but there was no difference between the number of eggs on dental wicks and KimwipesTM (P = 0.829). Based on this and the results from the no-choice tests, cotton balls were preferred by B. hilaris as an artificial oviposition substrate.

The authors thank Brianna Whitman and Cleveland Ivey for assistance with colony maintenance and data collection. The authors thank the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry for allocation of space in their maximum security quarantine facility, and Phillip Lake and David Davidson for assistance with quarantine procedures. Funding for the development of B. hilaris rearing protocols under quarantine conditions was provided by USDAAPHIS-PPQ Plant Protection Act Agreement No. AP18PPQS&T00C098 and AP19PPQFO000C460. Partial funding also was provided by USDA-National Institute of Food and Agriculture project number 2017-70006-27149.

Fig. 2.

Mean number of eggs oviposited by 10 Bagrada hilaris females on dental wicks, cotton balls, or Kimwipes in no-choice and choice tests. There was a significant effect of substrate type on the number of eggs oviposited in both the no-choice (F = 7.981; df = 2; P < 0.001) and choice (F = 28.61; df = 2; P < 0.001) tests.

img-z3-3_401.jpg

References Cited

1.

Atwal AS. 1959. The oviposition behavior of Bagrada cruciferarum Kirkaldy (Pentatomidae: Heteroptera) and the influence of temperature and humidity on the speed of development of eggs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences India 25: 65–67. Google Scholar

2.

FDACS – Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services. 2018. Florida agriculture: by the numbers,  https://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_State/Florida/Publications/Annual_Statistical_Bulletin/index.php(last accessed 22 Jun 2020). Google Scholar

3.

Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P. 2008. Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometrical Journal 50: 346–363. Google Scholar

4.

Huang TI, Reed DA, Perring TM, Palumbo JC. 2014. Host selection behavior of Bagrada hilaris (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) on commercial cruciferous host plants. Crop Protection 59: 7–13. Google Scholar

5.

Mendiburu F. 2020. Agricolae package, vers. 1.3–2.  https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=agricolae(last accessed 22 Jun 2020). Google Scholar

6.

Palumbo JC, Natwick ET. 2010. The bagrada bug (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae): a new invasive pest of cole crops in Arizona and California. Plant Health Progress. https://doi.org/10.1094/php-2010-0621-01-brGoogle Scholar

7.

Palumbo JC, Perring TM, Millar JG, Reed DA. 2016. Biology, ecology, and management of an invasive stink bug, Bagrada hilaris, in North America. Annual Review of Entomology 61: 453–473. Google Scholar

8.

RStudio Team. 2015. RStudio: integrated development for R. RStudio, Inc., Boston, Massachusetts, USA.  http://www.rstudio.com/(last accessed 22 Jun 2020). Google Scholar

9.

R Project. 2013. R: a language and environment for statistical computing, Vers. 3.5.0. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.  https://www.r-project.org/(last accessed 22 Jun 2020). Google Scholar

10.

Reed DA, Ganjisaffar F, Palumbo JC, Perring TM. 2017. Effects of temperatures on immature development and survival of the invasive stink bug Bagrada hilaris (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 110: 2497–2503. Google Scholar

11.

Reed DA, Palumbo JC, Perring TM, May C. 2013. Bagrada hilaris (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae), an invasive stink bug attacking cole crops in the southwestern United States. Journal of Integrated Pest Management 4: C1–C7. Google Scholar

12.

Singh H, Malik VS. 1993. Biology of the painted bug (Bagrada cruciferarum). Indian Journal of Agricultural Science 63: 672–674. Google Scholar

13.

Taylor ME, Bundy CS, McPherson JE. 2014. Unusual ovipositional behavior of the stink bug Bagrada hilaris (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 107: 872–877. Google Scholar

14.

Taylor ME, Bundy CS, McPherson JE. 2015. Life history and laboratory rearing of Bagrada hilaris (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) with descriptions of immature stages. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 108: 536–551. Google Scholar

15.

USDA – United States Department of Agriculture. 2015. Pests regulated under a federally recognized state managed phytosanitary program,  https://www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/planthealth/plant-pest-and-disease-programs/frsmp/ct_pests_regulated(last accessed 22 Jun 2020). Google Scholar

16.

Verma AK, Paytal SK, Bhalla OP, Sharma KC. 1993. Bioecology of painted bug (Bagrada cruciferarum) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) on seed crop of cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var botrytis subvar cauliflora). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 63: 676–678. Google Scholar
Morgan G. Pinkerton, Sage M. Thompson, Amanda C. Hodges, Norman C. Leppla, and John C. Palumbo "Laboratory Rearing of Bagrada hilaris (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) under Quarantine Conditions in Florida, USA," Florida Entomologist 103(3), 401-403, (29 September 2020). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.103.0314
Published: 29 September 2020
JOURNAL ARTICLE
3 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top