Translator Disclaimer
13 January 2021 Preference of Orius insidiosus and Orius tristicolor (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) for Host Plants in Olfactometry and Free-Choice Experiments
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), is a key pest of sweet pepper cultivation, where it causes feeding damage, excretes phytotoxic substances, and transmits important viruses. Control with chemical insecticides often is ineffective because endophytic oviposition and the cryptic habits of the pest provide protection. In Uruguay, the biological control program of this pest in sweet pepper crops is at risk due to the low settlement rate and high dispersal of releases of predator Orius insidiosus (Say) (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae). Previous studies have ruled out an antibiosis effect as the cause of dispersal; therefore, we hypothesized antixenosis (non-preference) for the sweet pepper plants as the cause of poor biological control by O. insidiosus. The effect of olfactory stimuli from different structures of strawberry, corn, and sweet pepper plants (lamuyo and blocky type) on the behavior of O. insidiosus was evaluated in olfactometry and free-choice cage experiments. Since Orius tristicolor (White) (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) occurs naturally in the area, it was included also in the study with the aim of assessing whether there are differences in behavior between the species. Orius tristicolor may act as a complementary biocontrol agent or competitor on sweet pepper. Y-tube experiments showed no preference for plant volatiles in any combination, and response to volatile stimuli generally was poor. However, in the free-choice cage experiment, females of both species of Orius preferred the flowering strawberry plants over the flowering sweet pepper plants, which could explain the low establishment of O. insidiosus when released on pepper with neighboring strawberry fields. Given that horticultural greenhouses in Uruguay and in many other countries are open, this information can be very useful in designing the spatial and temporal management of different crops on a production field, which enhances the effectiveness of these predatory species.

Western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), is considered one of the most important pests of greenhouse crops (Gillespie & Vernon 1990; Salguero Navas et al. 1991; Bitterlich & McDonald 1993), limiting the productivity of these crops worldwide. In several countries in South America, it is designated as one of the most limiting pest insects of sweet pepper crops (Capsicum annum L.; Solanaceae) in greenhouses (Carrizo 1998). Adults and immature stages of this species cause damage to plants by puncturing and then sucking the cellular content of plant tissues (Hunter & Ullman 1989), producing white surface lesions in the epidermis. In addition, they secrete phytotoxic substances when they feed, causing deformation of the foliage in all plant structures and organs (Bosco et al. 2008; Castresana et al. 2008). They also can cause indirect damage by transmitting viruses such as tomato spotted wilt virus (tomato black plague virus) and impatiens necrotic spot virus (Whitfield et al. 2005). Tomato spotted wilt virus is one of the viruses that causes major damage to a wide range of crops (Fanigliulo et al. 2014) and F. occidentalis is one of the most efficient species in its transmission (Whitfield et al. 2005). Tomato spotted wilt virus has a wide host range and worldwide distribution (Sherwood et al. 2000). This virus may lead to major economic losses on tomato, lettuce, pepper, eggplant, french beans, broad beans, celery, and different ornamental plants (Roselló et al. 1996). Insecticide applications are not effective in controlling thrips in these systems because females place their eggs under the epidermis of plant leaves, and both immature and adult stages have cryptic habits that give them some protection against toxic substances (Hansen et al. 2003; Helyer & Brobyn 2008). Frequent applications of chemical controls harm the complex of their natural enemies, promote the rapid development of resistance (Castresana et al. 2008), and generate risks to human health from acute and chronic exposure (Damalas & Eleftherohorinos 2011).

As an alternative to chemical control, the use of generalist natural enemies in sweet pepper crops is used widely and has been proven successful (van Lenteren et al. 2018). The release of the predator Amblyseius swirskii (Athias-Henriot) (Acari: Phytoseiidae) together with Orius insidiosus (Say) (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) may manage the pepper pests Bemisia tabaci Gennadius (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) and Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) successfully (Funderburk et al. 2000; Chow et al. 2010; Calvo et al. 2014).

In Uruguay, the incidence of F. occidentalis affects more than 80% of the sweet pepper production area, with significant losses in production (Maeso et al. 2013). Additional damage is caused by the tobacco whitefly, B. tabaci, which in combination have traditionally forced growers to apply chemical insecticides repeatedly on the sweet pepper crop with little effect. In the current decade, biological control in protected horticultural crops has made great progress in Uruguay, where the release of A. swirskii has reduced the incidence of B. tabaci on sweet peppers (Buenahora & Basso 2015). At the same time, the release of O. insidiosus in numerous greenhouses reached a low settlement rate and did not result in a reduction in the populations of F. occidentalis and their crop damage. These results contrast with the statements of Funderburk et al. (2000) indicating that O. insidiosus is effective in suppressing populations of thrips in field sweet pepper crops. It is even indicated that O. insidiosus remains in that crop for up to 6 mo after having eliminated F. occidentalis (van den Meiracker & Ramakers 1991). Uruguay is part of the distribution area of O. insidiosus (Bentancourt & Scatoni 2001; Carpintero 2002), but not of Orius laevigatus (Fieber) (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae), which is the most widely used species in Europe for biological control of thrips with successful results in sweet pepper (Jacas et al. 2008; van Lenteren 2012). In Europe, the varieties of sweet pepper planted belong preferably to the blocky type, unlike Uruguay, where all varieties are of the lamuyo type (Orius works well in both types of sweet pepper).

Studies conducted by Lorenzo et al. (2019) made it possible to rule out that settlement and effectiveness difficulties of O. insidiosus in the pepper greenhouses in Uruguay were due to an antibiosis effect. Discounting that the low settlement of O. insidiosus is associated with the use of chemical insecticides for the control of other pests because there was a strict control of the products used for these purposes, it was hypothesized that an effect of antixenosis or non-preference was operating in relation to the sweet pepper plant. It should be noted also that the greenhouses used in Uruguay are open and are surrounded by 2 other common hosts of O. insidiosus (strawberry and corn) which are cultivated simultaneously with sweet pepper crops and coincide in their period of flowering in the field.

It is known that the olfactory system allows insects to distinguish the specific volatile compounds emitted by plants (Visser 1986; Bernays & Chapman 1994). These chemical compounds are useful cues for the insect to locate and recognize the plant as a suitable host, which are used to act as inhibitors or stimulants for feeding or oviposition (Campbell et al. 1986; Smith & Boyko 2006). The preferred behavior of females for oviposition derives from particular chemical, physical, and nutritional characteristics of plants (Lundgren & Fergen 2006; Lundgren et al. 2008). In this way, antixenosis or non-preference allows certain genotypes of plants to be incompatible with a specific insect, preventing insect establishment, feeding, or oviposition (Painter 1951). Anthocorids display this behavior, which allows them to select the oviposition substrates by physical and chemical factors (Richards & Schmidt 1996; Griffin & Yeargan 2002). It should be considered that Orius, although being highly appreciated as entomophagous, lay their eggs inside plant tissues (Lundgren & Fergen 2006; Lundgren et al. 2008) and may even complete their development on certain foods of plant origin (Cocuzza et al. 1997). In recent studies, the phytophagous feeding behavior of O. laevigatus on sweet pepper was shown to trigger defensive responses in the plant. Plant induced defenses may contribute to the repellence or attraction of pests or natural enemies. Specifically, O. laevigatus-punctured sweet pepper plants induced repellency for the whitefly B. tabaci and the thrips F. occidentalis (Bouagga et al. 2018).

Based on the above, the study of preference or non-preference (antixenosis) for possible hosts may help explain the possible causes of low settlement and reproduction of O. insidiosus on sweet pepper. At the same time, it was of interest to compare the behavior of this species with O. tristicolor, which is normally found in corn (Zea mays L.; Poaceae) and strawberry (Fragaria sp.; Rosaceae) crops (Carpintero 2002; Ribeiro & Castiglioni 2008) near the sweet pepper greenhouses. As with O. insidiosus, it is common to find O. tristicolor in corn panicles due to the abundance of pollen, and in the styles of female flowers near stigmas (Corey et al. 1998), and in strawberry associated with flowers (Saini et al. 2003). Therefore, knowing the behavior of O. tristicolor in the cultivation of sweet pepper will let us know if it can be released together with O. insidiosus and contribute to the control of thrips in this crop.

In view of these questions, the purpose of this study was to characterize the preference of O. insidiosus and O. tristicolor for 3 of their host plants. Preference for cultivated varieties of sweet pepper, strawberry, and corn were evaluated under Y-tube olfactometer conditions and in free-choice experiments.

Materials and Methods

PLANT MATERIAL AND INSECTS

Studies were carried out in the laboratory and in a greenhouse of Plant Protection-Entomology at the Experimental Station of the School of Agronomy, Universidad de la República in Salto, Uruguay. Orius insidiosus and O. tristicolor were obtained from the field and maintained in our laboratory at 25 ± 1 °C, 65 ± 10% RH, fed with eggs of Ephestia kuehniella Zeller (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) ad libitum with bean pods (Phaseolus vulgaris L.; Fabaceae) as an oviposition substrate (Castanñé & Zalom 1994; Richards & Schmidt 1996; Mendes et al. 2005). For the experiments, a photoperiod of 16:8 h (L: D) was used pursuant to Richards & Schmidt (1996).

The plants used for tests were propagated in the Station at the School of Agronomy, Universidad de la República in Salto, Uruguay. The cultivation conditions were optimized in order to obtain good production of flowers (Corey et al. 1998; Saini et al. 2003). Five liter pots (Media Grow, Montevideo, Uruguay) were used with a sterile substrate (Plagron allmix, Bertels, Netherlands) that is a mix of the types of peat which contain various types of fiber and perlite, along with localized and automated irrigation. Plants were propagated from seed and fertilized based on optimal rates for the region (MGAP 2016). The plants evaluated were sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum) lamuyo type (cultivar ‘Bilano' by Syngenta) and blocky type (cultivar ‘Physol' by Agritec), strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch [Rosaceae], cultivar ‘Guapa' by INIA), and corn (Zea mays, cultivar ‘IPB 2650’ by IPB seeds).

Y-TUBE EXPERIMENTS

A glass Y-tube olfactometer was used, with an internal diameter of 0.5 cm, which is a modified version of the one developed by Sabelis & van de Baan (1983), applying the methodology proposed by Koschier et al. (2000). The olfactometer consisted of a central chamber (long arm 12 cm) from which 2 arms of choice are derived (6 cm). At the far ends of the Y-shaped glass tube, PVC tubes (10 cm) were connected that contain either the presumed odor-emitting plants or clean air. The apparatus also contained an activated carbon filter, a pump for air circulation, and a rotameter for the measurement of air flow. The airflow in each arm of the olfactometer was calibrated to 0.5 m per s (VelociCalc® Air velocity Meter 9545-A, TSI, Shoreview, Minnesota, USA). Through this system it is possible to observe and subsequently record the movement of each insect within the central chamber and in the arms of the Y olfactometer. The tests were conducted in a climate-controlled room at 25 ± 2 °C and 65 ± 5% RH.

The response of adult females of O. insidiosus and O. tristicolor was evaluated to stimuli from different structures of foliage and flowers (Visser & Piron 1998; Drukker et al. 2000; López-Ávila & Rincón 2006; Yoneya et al. 2009, 2010; Bosa et al. 2011), with an approximate weight of 1 g each (Reid & Lampman 1989). Whole leaves and flowers were used, washed with water and weighed. The materials were used in individual experiments for 30 min and were not used for more than 2 h altogether. The stimuli compared were strawberry, sweet pepper, or corn leaves versus control (clean air); strawberry, sweet pepper, or corn flowers versus control (clean air); or sweet pepper flower versus strawberry flower. For sweet pepper, both blocky and lamuyo type sweet peppers, foliage, and flowers were tested versus control (clean air).

In each test, a single female of O. insidiosus or O. tristicolor was placed in the central part of the olfactometer main chamber with the help of a fine tip brush to avoid damaging the insect. The chamber was then sealed with cotton. The experiment was carried out with 40 females of the 2 species of Orius less than 72 h old. The females were placed individually in plastic containers without food for a period of 8 to 10 h before the test. Forty females were evaluated (n = 40) in each experiment, 20 predators per d.

The initial choice of the insect was recorded, and a response was considered positive when, within 10 min, the insect remained inside 1 of the olfactometer arms after moving past the center of the glass tube (Pivnick et al. 1990; Peraza 2011). Upon reaching the Y-junction in the glass tube, the Orius could choose between the air flow coming from either arm. When it reached the far end of an arm, the choice was noted, and the insect was removed from the tube. If the insect did not enter the decision zone within the established period, the test was recorded as null.

All treatments were evaluated in a darkened space to focus the experiment on the volatile substances generated by the plants introduced into the Y-tube 5 min before the start of each test. Between tests, the olfactometer was cleaned with 70% acetone to remove possible traces of contaminants or pheromones. The acetone was left to evaporate for 1 min at ambient conditions. In addition, to avoid any bias, the sources of odors were alternately switched to the other arm of the olfactometer after every 5 females tested, and the plant material was replaced after every 10 females.

CHOICE-TEST EXPERIMENTS

Antixenosis (non-preference) was evaluated by the free host selection test following the methodology of Castro et al. (2001). The study was carried out in a research greenhouse made of polyethylene (Naka SA, Montevideo, Uruguay) measuring 10 × 5 m, under controlled conditions of temperature and humidity (22–26 °C, 60–70% RH). The sweet pepper and strawberry plants were kept in plastic pots 20 cm in diam and 10 cm deep (Biriden, Montevideo, Uruguay) until sprouting of first flowers.

A micro-plot of 4 m2, covered with a non-woven polypropylene mesh (MC Agryl P 17) (Naka SA, Montevideo, Uruguay) was placed inside the greenhouse to prevent dispersal of the insects. Twelve-wk old sweet pepper plants (30 cm high) and 11-wk old strawberry plants (25 cm high) were arranged alternatively with 20 cm distance between them, with 6 rows and 6 columns (36 plants). In the center of each plot, 72 females (two 1–5 d old Orius per plant) of each species of Orius to be evaluated (O. insidiosus or O. tristicolor) were released. Separate experiments were performed for each species of Orius, and the insects were allowed free choice of the host plants. In a second pair of experiments, both species of insects was tested regarding their preference for lamuyo or blocky type sweet pepper plants using the same procedure described above. At 24 h after release, the number of females present per plant was counted. Each experiment attempted to simulate the cultivation conditions in the area, matching time of transplantation, flowering, and release of natural enemies as would occur in the field.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

In both experimental designs, olfactometer and micro-plot, the preference for a plant or plant organ, was analyzed using a Chi-square goodness of fit test corrected for continuity (Yates-correction). The null hypothesis was that Orius spp. distribution was 50:50 across the 2 arms of the olfactometer and on the 2-plant species (sweet pepper and strawberry) or pepper cultivar (lamuyo and blocky). Analyses were performed using the R version 3.3.2 (R Core Team 2016).

Results

Y-TUBE EXPERIMENTS

Females of O. insidiosus preferred stimuli from strawberry flowers compared to those from sweet pepper flowers (χ2 = 5.565; P = 0.018), while females of O. tristicolor preferred the stimuli originated in the sweet pepper leaves over the control (pure air) (χ2 = 9.520; P = 0.002). In the other combinations tested, no differences were found in the response to odor stimuli (Tables 1, 2).

Table 1.

Olfactory response of females of Orius insidiosus and Orius tristicolor to stimuli from foliage and flower of strawberry, corn, and pepper plants (in the arm [+]), when offered against clean air (in the arm [–]) of a Y-tube olfactometer.

img-z4-2_492.gif

Females of O. insidiosus showed no preference between blocky or lamuyo type sweet pepper foliage (χ2 = 0.320; P = 0.572), and the same result was obtained when evaluating blocky sweet pepper flower compared to lamuyo sweet pepper flower (χ2 = 3.769; P = 0.052; α = 0.05), although the value obtained is at the limit, being almost significant (Table 3). The females of O. tristicolor also did not show a preference for blocky or lamuyo type sweet peppers, either in foliage (χ2 = 0.077; P = 0.782) or flower (χ2 = 1,796; P = 0.181) (Table 3).

CHOICE TESTS EXPERIMENTS

After 24 h of being released, females of both species preferred strawberry plants over sweet pepper plants (O. insidiosus, χ2 = 4.721, p = 0.030; O. tristicolor, χ2 = 4.321; p = 0.038) (Table 4).

The females of the two species of Orius did not show a different preference between lamuyo or blocky type sweet pepper plants (O. insidiosusχ2 = 0.450; P = 0.371; O. tristicolorχ2 = 1,389, P = 0.239) (Table 4).

Discussion

In the process of colonization of a host, the behavior of females, including those belonging to Anthocoridae, usually includes a sequence of patterns consisting of orientation, landing, and recognition under different selection pressures. Currently, the mechanisms Orius spp. employ to locate their host in complex mixed-vegetation habitats remain poorly understood. All steps involve different senses and occur at varying distances from the plant surface; because olfactory and visual cues are perceptible at distance, they play a determinant role in plant location by foraging insects (Schoonhoven et al. 1998).

Table 2.

Olfactory response of females of Orius insidiosus and Orius tristicolor to stimuli from strawberry flowers (on the arm [+]), when offered against pepper flowers (on the arm [–]) of an olfactometer of Y-tube.

img-z4-15_492.gif

It is worth emphasizing the importance of visual search cues in Hemiptera, such as aphid and whitefly (Pickett et al. 1992; Isaacs et al. 1999). Ohno & Takemoto (1997) and Furihata et al. (2019) established that Orius spp. responded to different colors of traps, when they demonstrated that blue sticky traps were more effective for monitoring studies than white or yellow ones. Studies by Patt et al. (2011) showed that visual stimuli improve olfactory responses to the volatile compounds of the host plant. In fact, to initiate the process of colonization of a host, an olfactory stimulus may not be sufficient to generate a search for resources and oviposition (Visser 1986; Bernays & Chapman 1994; Finch & Collier 2000; Awmack & Leather 2002). The low response rate obtained in the Y-tube bioassays was due possibly to insufficient olfactory stimulation. In general, when a high percentage of test insects do not show a response in the Y tubes, the species does not respond to odor stimuli (this is not the case with Orius spp.) or the olfactory stimulus is not sufficient to induce search behaviors (Drukker et al. 2000; Bernardo 2015; Ardanuy et al. 2016).

It also should be noted that the size of the leaf or flower offered (amount of plant material = 1 g) as a source of odor may not have been sufficient. This could explain why the females of O. insidiosus showed no preference for the foliage and flowers of sweet pepper, strawberry, or corn in relation to fresh air (control). Another aspect to consider is that cutting leaves or using structures and not whole plants could affect the chemical composition and influence the behavior of the species observed (Madadi et al. 2008). Cut plants may have different odor profiles; the volatile flowers, undamaged leaves, and leaves attacked by herbivores often exhibit different emission patterns from each other (Dudareva & Negre 2005), i.e., each plant structure has a specific odor profile (Karlsson et al. 2009).

Table 3.

Olfactory response of females of Orius insidiosus and Orius tristicolor to stimuli from foliage pepper type blocky (on the arm [+]) when offered against foliage pepper type lamuyo (on the arm [–]) or flower pepper type blocky (on the arm [+]) when offered against flower pepper type lamuyo (on the arm [–]) of an olfactometer of Y-tube.

img-z5-2_492.gif

The release of volatile defense compounds by plant substrates should not be ruled out either, because it has been reported that in other species of Solanaceae, such as tomatoes, substances derived from sesquiterpenes can repel insects (Frelichowski & Juvik 2005; Álvarez Gil 2015). Recent results by Bouagga et al. (2018) indicate that O. laevigatus punctures in the sweet pepper plants induced the release of an altered blend of volatiles and activation of the jasmonate acid and salicylic acid signaling pathways. These results highlight a potential tritrophic interaction in which the predator is able to induce defensive responses in the plant that reduces feeding by the pest.

In free-choice experiments, the difference found in the preference of females of O. insidiosus and O. tristicolor for the volatiles emitted by flowering strawberry plants compared to those of flowering sweet pepper plants would confirm that the females use chemical and olfactory cues to recognize their plant host, and that these cues favored strawberry. In the case of strawberry, volatile compounds have been studied widely in fruits; however, there are no studies that evaluate the aromatic differences between the organs of the plant or the whole plant at different phenological stages (Pérez-Rubio 1994). It should be considered that in polyphagous insects, the developmental stage of the host plant can determine the preference, where the main hosts emit a set of very similar volatiles, but both host and non-host plants are more attractive to many species during the flowering stage (Rajapakse 2006). The positive response behavior to the volatile emitted by plants in the flowering stage may be dependent on the response of the anthocorids to this stage of the plant where they feed on pollen and oviposit. It is known that females, during the search for hosts for oviposition, seek to ensure that the plant guarantees the best development of immature stages (Schoonhoven et al. 2005; Carroll et al. 2006), a principle known as “mother knows best” (Singer et al. 1988; Schoonhoven et al. 2005). As various authors indicated, sweet pepper produces numerous volatile compounds and at least 14 of them are released during flowering and fructification (Addesso et al. 2011), phenological stages when sweet pepper plants are highly attractive to Orius spp. adults. The principal compound emitted during these stages is (E)-beta-ocimene (Addesso et al. 2011). This monoterpene has been reported to affect the behavior of adults of some species Coleoptera (Magalhães et al. 2012). Other volatile compounds from Capsicum spp. also induce behavioral or electrophysiological activity in different species (Muñiz et al. 2014).

Table 4.

Response of females Orius insidiosus and Orius tristicolor to sweet pepper plant type blocky and type lamuyo, and strawberry plant in the free-choice test.

img-z5-12_492.gif

Although the results of this study arise from experiments under controlled conditions in a laboratory or greenhouse, they can be considered useful for informing the management of these predators in the field. These results suggest that females of Orius would be able to discriminate between different host plants, and that in particular both O. insidiosus and O. tristicolor show greater preference for strawberry crops than sweet pepper crops, which could explain the low rate of establishment of the Orius females in the sweet pepper crop when they are released on it. It should be noted that in Uruguay, unlike in other horticultural areas, greenhouses are not closed and sweet pepper often is surrounded by other crops, including strawberry. The evaluated host plants coincide with each other in their period of cultivation and flowering in the field. Sweet pepper under greenhouse (113 ha in the country) and strawberry under micro or macro tunnel (55 ha in the country) are produced from Mar to Dec and coincide in their flowering periods (MGAP 2016). The first pepper and strawberry blossoms coincide with the end of corn cultivation, and it is very common to find corn in the surroundings of the greenhouses with the presence of Orius. Although these results contrast with those stated by van den Meiracker & Ramakers (1991) and Funderburk et al. (2000), where these authors described the establishment and effectiveness of O. insidiosus to control F. occidentalis on sweet pepper, they do not indicate whether the greenhouses in these systems were closed or open, or whether there were crops in the vicinity of the sweet peppers that could have interfered with predator establishment.

It should be reiterated that, as evidenced by Lorenzo et al. (2019), there is no effect of sweet pepper antibiosis on O. insidiosus; therefore, if there were no other repellent stimuli present it would remain and reproduce on the sweet pepper crop. The type of sweet pepper grown in Uruguay (lamuyo) did not have an influence on this non-preference either, because no differences were observed in preference for lamuyo or blocky sweet peppers. Although females of the species O. tristicolor were attracted to stimuli from sweet pepper foliage as opposed to pure air, they also were attracted to strawberry plants in the micro-plot test, which could explain their absence on sweet pepper crops while still being found in other hosts surrounding pepper greenhouses.

As a complement, a tool to improve the establishment and colonization by Orius could be banker plants located inside the greenhouse. Native species with good flowering and good acceptance by Orius should be investigated. Determining a suitable flowering banker plant could improve opportunities for using the predator to control thrips by providing a source of supplementary food in the form of pollen (Huang et al. 2011).

Given that the horticultural greenhouses in Uruguay and in many other countries are open, these results regarding Orius preference for different crops may be very useful to aid in the design of spatial and temporal management of different horticultural crops on a production field in order to enhance the effectiveness of these predatory species.

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank the National Research and Innovation Institute and the Experimental Station of the School of Agronomy, University of the Republic in Salto, Uruguay, which provided their facilities and economic support for the study.

References Cited

1.

Addesso KM, McAuslane HJ, Alborn HT. 2011. Attraction of pepper weevil to volatiles from damaged pepper plants. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 138: 1–11. Google Scholar

2.

Álvarez Gil M. 2015. Resistencia de insectos en tomate (Solanum spp.). Cultivos Tropicales 36: 100–110. Google Scholar

3.

Ardanuy A, Albajes R, Turlings TC. 2016. Innate and learned prey-searching behavior in a generalist predator. Journal of Chemical Ecology 42: 497–507. Google Scholar

4.

Awmack CS, Leather SR. 2002. Host plant quality and fecundity in herbivorous insects. Annual Review of Entomology 47: 817–844. Google Scholar

5.

Bentancourt CM, Scatoni IB. 2001. Enemigos naturales. Manual ilustrado para la agricultura y la forestación. Universidad de la República (Uruguay). Facultad de Agronomía, PREDEG-GTZ, Montevideo, Uruguay. Google Scholar

6.

Bernardo A. 2015. Alternative food and learning as a promising strategy for biological control. M.Sc. thesis, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Google Scholar

7.

Bernays E, Chapman R. 1994. Behavior: the process of host-plant selection, pp. 95–165 In Bernays E, Chapman R [eds.], Host Plant Selection by Phytophagous Insects. Chapman & Hall, New York, USA. Google Scholar

8.

Bitterlich I, McDonald LS. 1993. The prevalence of tomato spotted wilt virus in weeds and crops in southwestern British Columbia. Canadian Plant Disease Survey 73: 137–142. Google Scholar

9.

Bosa CF, Clavijo A, Karlsson FM, Cotes AM, Witzgall P. 2011. Respuesta de Tecia solanivora (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) a compuestos volátiles de papa, Solanum tuberosum. Revista Colombiana de Entomología 37: 1–7. Google Scholar

10.

Bosco L, Giacometto E, Tavella L. 2008. Colonization and predation of thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) by Orius spp. (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) in sweet pepper greenhouses in Northwest Italy. Biological Control 44: 331–340. Google Scholar

11.

Bouagga S, Urbaneja A, Rambla JL, Granell A, Pérez-Hedo M. 2018. Orius laevigatus strengthens its role as a biological control agent by inducing plant defenses. Journal of Pest Science 91: 55–64. Google Scholar

12.

Buenahora J, Basso C. 2015. Utilización de Amblyseius swirskii, un enemigo natural clave para el manejo integrado de plagas en el cultivo de pimiento en invernadero, In 4tas. Jornadas de Enfermedades y Plagas en Cultivos Bajo Cubierta. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales de la Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina. Google Scholar

13.

Calvo FJ, Knapp M, van Houten YM, Hoogerbrugge H, Belda JE. 2014. Amblyseius swirskii: what made this predatory mite such a successful biocontrol agent? Experimental and Applied Acarology 65: 419–433. Google Scholar

14.

Campbell BC, Jones CK, Dreyer DL. 1986. Discriminative behavioral responses by aphids to various plant matrix polysaccharides. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 41: 17–24. Google Scholar

15.

Carpintero DL. 2002. Catalogue of the Neotropical Anthocoridae (Heteroptera). Revista Sociedad Entomológica Argentina 61: 25–44. Google Scholar

16.

Carrizo PL. 1998. Hospederas naturales para trips vectores de peste negra: propuesta de calificación de riesgo. Boletín de Sanidad Vegetal Plagas 24: 155–166. Google Scholar

17.

Carroll M, Schmelz E, Meagher R, Teal P. 2006. Attraction of Spodoptera frugiperda larvae to volatiles from herbivore-damaged maize seedlings. Journal of Chemical Ecology 32: 1911–1924. Google Scholar

18.

Castañé C, Zalom FG. 1994. Artificial oviposition substrate for rearing Orius insidiosus (Hemiptera, Anthocoridae). Biological Control 4: 88–91. Google Scholar

19.

Castresana J, Gagliano E, Puhl L, Bado S, Vianna L, Castresana M. 2008. Atracción del trips Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) con trampas de luz en el cultivo de Gerbera jamessonii (G.). Idesia 26: 51–56. Google Scholar

20.

Castro AM, Ramos S, Vasicek A, Worland A, Giménez D, Clúa A, Suárez E. 2001. Identification of wheat chromosomes involved with different types of resistance against greenbug and Russian wheat aphid (Diuraphis noxia Mordvilko). Euphytica 118: 321–330. Google Scholar

21.

Chow A, Chau A, Heinz KM. 2010. Compatibility of Amblyseius (Typhlodromips) swirskii (Athias-Henriot) (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and Orius insidiosus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) for biological control of Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on roses. Biological Control 53: 188–196. Google Scholar

22.

Cocuzza GE, De Clercq P, van de Veire M, De Cock A, Degheele D, Vacante V. 1997. Reproduction of Orius laevigatus and Orius albidipennis on pollen and Ephestia kuehniella eggs. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 82: 101–104. Google Scholar

23.

Corey D, Kamhampati S, Wilde GE. 1998. Electrophoretic analysis of Orius insidiosus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) feeding habits in field corn. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 71: 11–17. Google Scholar

24.

Damalas CA, Eleftherohorinos IG. 2011. Pesticide exposure, safety issues, and risk assessment indicators. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 8: 1402–1419. Google Scholar

25.

Dudareva N, Negre F. 2005. Practical applications of research into the regulation of plant volatile emission. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 8: 113–118. Google Scholar

26.

Fanigliulo A, Viggiano A, Gualco A, Crescenzi A. 2014. Control of viral diseases transmitted in a persistent manner by thrips in pepper (tomato spotted wild virus). Communications in Agricultural Applied Biological Science 79: 433–437. Google Scholar

27.

Finch S, Collier R. 2000. Host-plant selection by insects – a theory based on ‘appropriate/ inappropriate’ landings by pest insects of cruciferous plants. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 96: 91–102. Google Scholar

28.

Frelichowskijr JE, Juvik AJ. 2005. Inheritance of sesquiterpene carboxylic acid synthesis in crosses of Lycopersicon hirsutum with insect-susceptible tomatoes. Plant Breeding 124: 277–281. Google Scholar

29.

Funderburk J, Stavisky J, Olsen S. 2000. Predation of Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in field peppers by Orius insidiosus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae). Environmental Entomology 29: 376–382. Google Scholar

30.

Furihata S, Tabuchi K, Okudera S, Takahashi A, Hinomoto N, Shimoda M, Yamaguchi T. 2019. An efficient method for monitoring predatory minute pirate bugs Orius spp. (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) populations using blue-colored sticky traps. Environmental Entomology 48: 1–8. Google Scholar

31.

Gillespie DR, Vernon RS. 1990. Trap catch of western flower thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) as affected by color and height of sticky card traps in mature greenhouse cucumber crops. Journal of Economic Entomology 83: 971–975. Google Scholar

32.

Griffin ML, Yeargan KV. 2002. Oviposition site selection by the spotted lady beetle Coleomegilla maculata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae): choices among plant species. Environmental Entomology 31: 107–111. Google Scholar

33.

Hansen EA, Funderburk JE, Reitz SR, Ramachandran S, Eger JE, McAuslane H. 2003. Within-plant distribution of Frankliniella species (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and Orius insidiosus (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) in field pepper. Environmental Entomology 32: 1035–1044. Google Scholar

34.

Helyer NL, Brobyn PJ. 2008. Chemical control of western flower thrips (Frankliniella occidentalis Pergande). Annals of Applied Biology 121: 219–231. Google Scholar

35.

Huang N, Enkegaard A, Osborne LS, Ramakers PMJ, Messelink G, Pijnakker J, Murphy G. 2011. The banker plant method in biological control. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 30: 259–278. Google Scholar

36.

Hunter WB, Ullman DE. 1989. Analysis of mouthpart movements during feeding of Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) and F. schultzei trybom (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). International Journal of Insect Morphology and Embryology 18: 161–171. Google Scholar

37.

Isaacs R, Willis MA, Byrne DN. 1999. Modulation of whitefly takeoff and flight orientation by wind speed and visual cues. Physiological Entomology 24: 311–318. Google Scholar

38.

Jacas J, Urbaneja A, García Marí F. 2008. Artrópodos depredadores, pp. 39–56 In Jacas J, Urbaneja A [eds.], Control Biológico de Plagas Agrícolas. Phytoma, Valencia, Spain. Google Scholar

39.

Karlsson MF, Birgersson G, Cotes Prado AM. 2009. Plant odor analysis of potato: response of guatemalan moth to above- and belowground potato volatiles. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 57: 5903–5909. Google Scholar

40.

Koschier EH, de Kogel WJ, Visser JH. 2000. Assessing the attractiveness of volatile plant compounds to western flower thrips (Frankliniella occidentalis Pergande). Journal of Chemical Ecology 26: 2643–2655. Google Scholar

41.

López Ávila A, Rincón DF. 2006. Diseño de un olfatómetro de flujo de aire para medir respuestas olfativas de insectos de tamaño mediano y pequeño. Revista Corpoica – Ciencia y Tecnología Agropecuaria 7: 61–65. Google Scholar

42.

Lorenzo ME, Bao L, Mendez L, Grille G, Bonato O, Basso C. 2019. Effect of two oviposition feeding substrates on Orius insidiosus and Orius tristicolor (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae). Florida Entomologist 102: 395–402. Google Scholar

43.

Lundgren JG, Fergen JK. 2006. The oviposition behavior of the predator Orius insidiosus: acceptability and preference for different plants. BioControl 51: 217–227. Google Scholar

44.

Lundgren JG, Fergen JK, Riedell WE. 2008. The influence of plant anatomy on oviposition and reproductive success of the omnivorous bug, Orius insidiosus. Animal Behaviour 75: 1495–1502. Google Scholar

45.

Madadi H, Enkegaard A, Brødsgaard HF, Kharrazi-Pakdel A, Ashouri A, Mohaghegh-Neishabouri J. 2008. Orius albidipennis: intraguild predation of and prey preference for Neoseiulus cucumeris on different host plants. Entomologica Fennica 19: 32–40. Google Scholar

46.

Maeso D, Paullier J, González P, Arboleya J, Alfredo Fernández A, Walasek W. 2013. Seguimiento de “peste negra” en morrón: experimentos en la zona sur de Uruguay. INIA Serie Actividades de Difusión 723: 1–44. Google Scholar

47.

Magalhães DM, Borges M, Laumann RA, Sujii ER, Mayon P, Caulfield JC, Midega CAO, Khan ZR, Pickett JA, Birkett MA, Blassioli Moraes MC. 2012. Semiochemicals from herbivory induced cotton plants enhance the foraging behavior of the cotton boll weevil, Anthonomus grandis. Journal of Chemical Ecology 38: 1528–1538. Google Scholar

48.

Mendes SM, Bueno VHP, Carvalho LM. 2005. Adequabilidade de diferentes substratos à oviposição do predador Orius insidiosus (Say) (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae). Neotropical Entomology 34: 415–421. Google Scholar

49.

MGAP. 2016. Encuestas Hortícolas 2015-2016 – Zonas Sur y Litoral Norte.  https://www.gub.uy/ministerio-ganaderia-agricultura-pesca/datos-y-estadisticas/estadisticas/encuestas-horticolas-2015-2016-zonas-sur-litoral-norte-344 (last accessed 28 Jul 2020). Google Scholar

50.

Muñiz M, Cibrián J, Hidalgo C, Bautista N, Vaquera H, Aldama C. 2014. Volatile compounds attract the pepper (Capsicum spp.) weevil (Anthonomus eugenii Cano) and synergize its aggregation pheromone. Agrociencia 48: 819–832. Google Scholar

51.

Ohno K, Takemoto H. 1997. Species composition and seasonal occurrence of Orius spp. (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae), predacious natural enemies of Thrips palmi (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), in eggplant fields and surrounding habitats. Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology 32: 27–35. Google Scholar

52.

Painter RH. 1951. Insect Resistance to Crop Plants. The McMillan Co., New York., USA. Google Scholar

53.

Patt JM, Meikle WG, Mafra-Neto A, Setamou M, Mangan R, Yang C. 2011. Multimodal cues drive host-plant assessment in Asian citrus psyllid (Diaphorina citri). Environmental Entomology 40: 1494–1502. Google Scholar

54.

Peraza AR. 2011. Preferencia de hospedero y parámetros de desarrollo de Copitarsia decolora sobre plantas seleccionadas para la diversificación del cultivo de uchuva (Physalis peruviana).  bdigital.unal.edu.co/8426/ (last accessed 28 Jul 2020). Google Scholar

55.

Pérez Rubio AG. 1994. Composición aromática y biogénesis de compuestos volátiles en fresa (Fragariax ananassa Duch.) var. Chandler. Doctoral thesis. Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain. Google Scholar

56.

Pickett J, Wadhams L, Woodcock C, Hardie J. 1992. The chemical ecology of aphids. Annual Review of Entomology 37: 67–90. Google Scholar

57.

Pivnick K, Jarvis B, Slater G, Gillot C, Underhill E. 1990. Attraction of the diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) to volatiles of oriental mustard: the influence of age, sex, and prior exposure to mates and host plants. Environmental Entomology 19: 704–709. Google Scholar

58.

Rajapakse CNK, Walter GH, Moore CJ, Hull CD, Cribb BW. 2006. Host recognition by a polyphagous lepidopteran (Helicoverpa armigera): primary host plants, host produced volatiles and neurosensory stimulation. Physiological Entomology 31: 270–277. Google Scholar

59.

R Core Team. 2016. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Google Scholar

60.

Reid CD, Lampman RL. 1989. Olfactory responses of Orius insidiosus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) to volatiles of corn silks. Journal of Chemical Ecology 15: 1109–1111. Google Scholar

61.

Ribeiro A, Castiglioni E. 2008. Caracterización de las poblaciones de enemigos naturales de Piezodorus guildinii (Westwood) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Agrociencia 12: 48–56. Google Scholar

62.

Richards PC, Schmidt JM. 1996. The suitability of some natural and artificial substrates as oviposition sites for the insidious flower bug, Orius insidiosus. Entomología Experimentalis et Applicata 80: 325–333. Google Scholar

63.

Roselló S, Diaz MJ, Nuez F. 1996. Viral diseases causing economic losses to the tomato crop. I. the tomato spotted wilt virus - a review. Scientia Horticulturae 67: 117–150. Google Scholar

64.

Sabelis MW, van de Baan HE. 1983. Location of distant spider mite colonies by phytoseiid predators: demonstration of specific kairomones emitted by Tetranychus urticae and Panonychus ulmi. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 33: 303–314. Google Scholar

65.

Saini E, Cervantes V, Alvarado L. 2003. Efecto de la temperatura, la dieta y el hacinamiento sobre la fecundidad, fertilidad y longevidad de Orius insidiosus (Say) (Hemiptera: Antocoridae) predador del trips en cultivos protegidos. Revista de Investigaciones Agropecuarias 2: 21–32. Google Scholar

66.

Salguero Navas VE, Funderburk JE, Olson SM, Beshear RJ. 1991. Damage to tomato fruit by the western flower thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Journal of Entomological Science 26: 436–442. Google Scholar

67.

Schoonhoven LM, Jermy T, van Loon J. 1998. Host-plant selection: how to find a host plant, pp. 121–153 In Schoonhoven LM, Jermy T, van Loon J [eds.], Insect-Plant Biology. Chapman & Hall, London, United Kingdom. Google Scholar

68.

Schoonhoven LM, van Loon JJA, Dicke M. 2005. Insect-Plant Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom. Google Scholar

69.

Sherwood J, German TL, Moyer JW, Ullman DE, Whitfield AE. 2000. Tomato spotted wilt, pp. 1030–1031 In Maloy OC, Murray TD [eds.], Encyclopedia of Plant Pathology. John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA. Google Scholar

70.

Singer MC, Ng D, Thomas CD. 1988. Heritability of oviposition preference and its relationship to offspring performance within a single insect population. Evolution 42: 977–985. Google Scholar

71.

Smith CM, Boyko EV. 2006. The molecular bases of plant resistance and defense responses to aphid feeding: current status. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 122: 1–16. Google Scholar

72.

van den Meiracker RAF, Ramakers PMJ. 1991. Biological control of the western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis, on sweet pepper with the anthocorid predator Orius insidiosus. Mededelingen van de Faculteit Landbouwwetenschappen, Rijksuniversiteit Gent 56: 241–249. Google Scholar

73.

van Lenteren JC. 2012. The state of commercial augmentative biological control: plenty of natural enemies, but a frustrating lack of uptake. Biocontrol 57: 1–20. Google Scholar

74.

van Lenteren JC, Bolckmans K, Köhl J, Ravensberg WJ, Urbaneja A. 2018. Biological control using invertebrates and microorganisms: plenty of new opportunities. BioControl 63: 39–59. Google Scholar

75.

Visser JH. 1986. Host odor perception in phytophagous insect. Annual Review of Entomology 31: 121–144. Google Scholar

76.

Visser JH, Piron PGM. 1998. An open Y-track olfactometer for recording of aphid behavioural responses to plant odours. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 9: 41–46. Google Scholar

77.

Whitfield AE, Ullman DE, German TL. 2005. Tospovirus-thrips interactions. Annual Review of Phytopathology 43: 459–489. Google Scholar

78.

Yoneya K, Kugimiya S, Takabayashi J. 2009. Do adult leaf beetles (Plagiodera versicolora) discriminate between odors from intact and leaf-beetle-infested willow shoots? Journal of Plant Interactions 4: 125–129. Google Scholar

79.

Yoneya K, Ozawa R, Takabayashi J. 2010. Specialist leaf beetle larvae use volatiles from willow leaves infested by conspecifics for reaggregation in a tree. Journal of Chemical Ecology 36: 671–679. Google Scholar
María E. Lorenzo, Leticia Bao, Luciana Mendez, Gabriela Grille, Olivier Bonato, and César Basso "Preference of Orius insidiosus and Orius tristicolor (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) for Host Plants in Olfactometry and Free-Choice Experiments," Florida Entomologist 103(4), 492-498, (13 January 2021). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.103.00412
Published: 13 January 2021
JOURNAL ARTICLE
7 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top