Translator Disclaimer
1 September 2010 Intrapopulation Variation in an Australian Population of the North American Thrips, Bagnalliella yuccae (Thysanoptera: Phlaeothripidae), a New Record from Australia
Desley J. Tree
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The genus Bagnalliella Karny is an endemic North American genus of Phlaeothripidae with 7 species associated with the New World plant genus Yucca; 2 Old World species currently placed in the genus are probably not congeneric. The number of sensoria on antennal segments III and IV has been used to distinguish the Bagnalliella species on Yucca, but an invasive population of Bagnalliella yuccae (Hinds) is reported here from Australia, at Brisbane, Queensland, in which the number of sensoria varied between individuals and even between left and right antennae of single individuals. These observations cast considerable doubt on the validity of some of the North American species of Bagnalliella. The Australian population was damaging young leaves of Yucca elephantipes, and indicates the ease with which thrips can be distributed by the horticultural trade.

Seven of the 9 thrips species listed in the genus Bagnalliella Karny are known from Yucca plants in North America (B. arizonae, B. australis, B. desertae, B. glaucae, B. huachucae, B. mojave, and B. yuccae). These species have been described from various Yucca spp. covering large areas from east coast North America, Central America, and across to west coast North America (Table 3). In contrast, 2 species, B. flavipes from New Guinea and B. robusta from Africa, possibly belong in other genera (Hoddle et al. 2009).

Bagnalliella yuccae (Hinds) was first described in 1902 from Amherst, Massachusetts and Washington District of Columbia on the East coast of North America on Yucca filamentosa and Solidago spp. flowers (goldenrod) as Cephalothrips yuccae Hinds (see Mound 2009). Cott (1956) reported that B. yuccae was known from several Yucca spp. including Yucca filamentosa, and Solidago spp., and was also only known to occur east of the Mississippi River, USA. Only one female specimen was recorded from Solidago (Cott 1956), raising considerable doubt of this being a true host record. Currently B. yuccae is known from Japan, Korea, the Mediterranean region of Europe, Russia, North America (Okajima 2006), and now Australia. The genus Yucca contains approximately 47 species and their natural distributions cover North and Central America, extending into the West Indies (Mabberley 2008). Bagnalliella. yuccae has undoubtedly been transported around the world by the horticultural trade on cultivated Yucca species (Mound & Marullo 1996; Okajima 2006).

No key to distinguish between the 7 species of Bagnalliella from Yucca has ever been produced, although Cott (1956) produced a key distinguishing 3 of these species. That key relies heavily on the number of sensoria on antennal segments III and IV According to their original descriptions, the American species differ from the type species, B. yuccae (Figs. 1B and C) as follows; B. arizonae—body color and size of tenth abdominal segment (Hood 1927a), B. australis—color of head and antennae, size of antennal segments (Hood 1939), B. desertae—1 minute sensorium on antennal segment III (Hood 1927a), B. glaucae - color of subhypodermal pigmention (Hood 1927b), B. huachucae—size of antennal segment II and tenth abdominal segment (Hood 1927a), B. mojave— color of antennae and 1 minute sensorium on antennal segment III (Hood 1927a).

Fig. 1.

A—Bagnalliella yuccae feeding at the bases of young leaves of Y. elephantipes ‘Silver Star’ (variegated variety), in Brisbane, Australia (feeding damage marked by white arrow); B—Adult female Bagnalliella yuccae; C Head of adult female Bagnalliella yuccae.

f01_346.eps

In Sep 2009, a routine inspection at a wholesale nursery in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia found cultivated plants of Yucca elephantipes (Agavaceae) with established populations of large, dark thrips feeding at the bases of the young leaves (Fig. 1A). Although confirmed as a species of Bagnalliella Hinds (Laurence A. Mound, Australian National Insect Collection, Canberra), further study indicated that these specimens failed to match precisely the available descriptions of B. yuccae (Cott 1956; Stannard 1968; Okajima 2006; Hoddle et al. 2009) because of variation in the number of sensoria on the third and fourth antennal segments. Several thrips identified as Bagnalliella sp. (LAM, ANIC) were intercepted by the Australian Quarantine and Inspection Service (AQIS), Melbourne, Australia during 2005 and 2006 (B. Crowe, AQIS, personal communication). These thrips were found on stems of Yucca elephantipes imported from Costa Rica and Guatemala and were consequently fumigated. In order to help with identifying this invasive species, a study was made of the variation in the number of antennal sensoria.

TABLE 1.

NUMBER OF SENSORIA ON ANTENNAL SEGMENTS III AND IV ON BAGNALLIELLA YUCCAE FROM ORIGINAL DESCRIPTION IN 4 MAJOR PUBLICATIONS AND VARIATION ACROSS AUSTRALIAN SPECIMENS.

t01_346.gif

TABLE 2.

NUMBER OF SENSORIA ON LEFT AND RIGHT ANTENNAL SEGMENTS HI AND IV ON INDIVIDUALS OF INTERCEPTED AND AUSTRALIAN SPECIMENS.

t02_346.gif

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Three collections of B. yuccae were taken from new leaf bases of Y. elephantipes (non-variegated variety) and Y. elephantipes ‘Silver Star’ (variegated variety), in Brisbane, Australia, and the number of sensoria on antennal segments III and IV were counted. The first collection taken in late Sep 2009 was from Y. elephantipes ‘Silver Star’ and 2 weeks later the second collection was taken again from Y. elephantipes ‘Silver Star’ (Fig. 1A), together with the third collection from Y. elephantipes. Specimens of intercepted thrips from Melbourne, Australia (origin, Costa Rica; May and Sep 2005, Jan 2006) were borrowed and included for analysis in this study.

Fig. 2.

Dorsal and ventral views of a Bagnalliella yuccae individual's antennal segments III and IV showing variation of sensorial (arrows). A—Left antennae dorsal view, III has 1 sensorium, IV has 1 sensorium; B—Left antennae ventral view, III has 2 sensoria, IV has 2 sensoria (1 split); C—Right antennae dorsal view, III has 1 sensorium, IV has 2 sensoria; D—Right antennae ventral view, III has 2 sensoria, IV has 2 sensoria.

f02_346.eps

In total, 20 B. yuccae specimens (13 females and 7 males) from the 3 Brisbane collections were mounted onto glass microscope slides in Canada balsam (see Hoddle et al. 2009 for mounting protocol) (Figs. 1B and C). These specimens, together with 9 slide-mounted specimens from the interception in Melbourne were studied under a Nikon 90i compound microscope with Differential Interference Contrast objectives. The number of sensoria on antennal segments III and IV was counted and recorded for left and right antennae. All slidemounted specimens of B. yuccae have been lodged as voucher specimens in the Queensland Primary Industries and Fisheries Entomology Collection and ANIC.

RESULTS

Variation in Antennal Sensoria

Table 1 indicates the number of sensoria on antennal segments III and IV of B. yuccae as indicated in the original description and 4 major publications on this species, together with the range of variation found within the intercepted material and established populations from Australia. It should be noted that 3 authors claim that there are 4 sensoria on segment four (Cott 1956; Stannard 1968; Hoddle et al. 2009) but 1 author states that there are only 3 sensoria on this segment (Okajima 2006) (Table 1). All authors agree there are 2 sensoria on the third segment (Table 1). In contrast, within the Australian population, the number of sensoria varied between individuals as well as between the left and right antennae of individuals (Table 2). The numbers of sensoria found on the left and right antennal segment III varied among individuals between 2, 3, or 4 in varying combinations (Fig. 2). Sensoria on the left and right antennal segment IV numbered 2, 3, or 4, again in varying combinations. Remarkably, 1 sensorium was unusually split (Fig. 2B). Within the 29 specimens included in this study, the most common combination of sensoria on antennal segments III and IV was as follows: 3 on III and 4 on IV in 12 females, and 2 on III and 3 on IV in 4 males. The 9 specimens intercepted in Melbourne, that originated from Costa Rica, showed little variation in the number of sensoria on antennal segments III and IV, with 7 specimens possessing the most common combination (3 on III and 4 on IV in females).

DISCUSSION

Within Thysanoptera, variation in numbers of sensoria on antennal segments III and IV is relatively uncommon (LAM, ANIC, personal communication). The tribe Haplothripini, of which Bagnalliella is a member, is reported to have 5 species that show variation in the number of sensoria on either antennal segment three or four; Karynothrips flavipes and K. melaleucus have either 3 or 4 sensoria on antennal segment IV (Goldarazena et al. 2008), Haplothrips bituberculatus has 3 or 4 sensoria on antennal segment IV, Haplothrips dicksoniae has 2 or 3 sensoria on antennal segment IV and Haplothrips frici 1 or 2 sensoria on antennal segment III (Mound & Minaei 2007). In Haplothripini species, the possession of 3 sensoria on antennal segment III is a plesiomorphic character state, which is retained by only a few genera (Mound & Minaei 2007).

The Australian specimens most closely match the descriptions of B. yuccae from the 4 major publications by Cott (1956), Stannard (1968), Okajima (2006), and Hoddle et al. (2009), except for the number of sensoria number on antennal segments III & IV. The possibility of the Australian populations being a mixture of different species seems unlikely. The lack of any consistency in the number of sensoria on antennal segments III & IV is most likely due to intra-specific variation. Bagnalliella yuccae specimens held in the Ewart Thrips Collection, University of California, Riverside, also exhibit similar variation in sensoria numbers on antennal segments III and IV as seen in the Australian material (M. Hoddle, UC, Riverside, California, personal communication).

The most recent publication concerning differences in Bagnalliella species was published over 50 years ago, and a re-examination of the genus is well overdue. Such a study should include not only the morphological differences between specimens from different species of Yucca, but also molecular analyses of DNA to help with species designations.

TABLE 3.

HOSTS AND DISTRIBUTIONS OF BAGNALLIELLA SPECIES, NORTH AMERICA, AS PUBLISHED IN THEIR ORIGINAL DESCRIPTIONS.

t03_346.gif

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Many thanks to Andrew Manners (QPI&F) for detecting and collecting populations of B. yuccae in Brisbane. Thanks to Luke Watson, Bill Crowe, and Mark Hoddle for providing information and specimens of B. yuccae. I am grateful to Laurence Mound, Andrew Manners, and Mark Hoddle for helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper.

REFERENCES CITED

1.

H. E. Cott 1956. Systematics of the Suborder Tubulifera (Thysanoptera) in California. Publications in Entomology, University of California 13: 1–216. Google Scholar

2.

A. Goldarazena , L. A. Mound , R. And Zur Strassen 2008. Nomenclatural problems among Thysanoptera (Insecta) of Costa Rica. Revista Biologia Tropical 56: 961–968 Google Scholar

3.

W. E. Hinds 1902. Contribution to a Monograph of the insects of the order Thysanoptera inhabiting North America. Proc. United States Natl. Museum 23: 79– 242. Google Scholar

4.

M. S. Hoddle , L. A. Mound , and D. L. Paris 2009. Thrips of California. Cd-rom published by CBIT Publishing, Queensland.  http://www.lucidcentral.org/keys/v3/thrips_of_california/Thrips_of_California.html  Google Scholar

5.

J. D. Hood 1927a. New western Thysanoptera. Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington 40: 197–204. Google Scholar

6.

J. D. Hood 1927b. New Thysanoptera from the United States. J. New York Entomol. Soc. 35: 123–142. Google Scholar

7.

J. D. Hood 1939. New North American Thysanoptera, principally from Texas. Revista de Entomologia 10: 550–619. Google Scholar

8.

D. J. Mabberley 2008. Mabberley's Plant Book, A Portable Dictionary of Plants, Their Classification and Uses. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. Google Scholar

9.

L. A. Mound 1997. Biological Diversity, pp. 197–215 In T. Lewis [ed.], Thrips as Crop Pests. CAB International, UK 740 pp. Google Scholar

10.

L. A. Mound 2009. Thysanoptera (Thrips) of the World - a checklist  http://www.ento.csiro.au/thysanoptera/worldthrips.html  Google Scholar

11.

L. A. Mound , R. And Marullo 1996. The Thrips of Central and South America: An Introduction (Insecta: Thysanoptera). Associated Publishers, Florida USA. Google Scholar

12.

L. A. Mound , K. And Minaei 2007. Australian thrips of the Haplothrips lineage (Insecta: Thysanoptera). J. Natural History 41: 2919–2978. Google Scholar

13.

S. Okajima 2006. The Insects of Japan Vol. 2. The Suborder Tubulifera (Thysanoptera). Touka Shobo Co. Ltd., Fukuoka, Japan. Google Scholar

14.

L. J. Stannard 1968. The Thrips, Thysanoptera, of Illinois. Bull. Illinois Natural History Survey 29: 213– 552. Google Scholar
Desley J. Tree "Intrapopulation Variation in an Australian Population of the North American Thrips, Bagnalliella yuccae (Thysanoptera: Phlaeothripidae), a New Record from Australia," Florida Entomologist 93(3), 346-351, (1 September 2010). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.093.0304
Published: 1 September 2010
JOURNAL ARTICLE
6 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top