As part of our routine surveillance for arboviruses transmitted by Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti (L.) (Diptera: Culicidae) in Yucatán State, México, we regularly monitor the mosquito fauna that occurs in the region. In this study, immature and adult mosquitoes were collected at 60 study sites (including residential premises, churches, tourist areas, cemeteries, forested areas, and garbage dump sites) in Yucatán State from Jul 2014 to Dec 2015. In total, 4,062 larvae, 344 pupae, and 3,812 adults representing 7 genera and 27 species were collected. Three species had never before been identified in Yucatán State, and these are Aedes (Ochlerotatus) euplocamus Dyar & Knab, Aedes (Protomacleaya) podographicus Dyar & Knab, and Culex (Culex) declarator Dyar & Knab. The identification of these 3 species brings the current total of mosquito species recognized in Yucatán State to 52 (with 11 genera). Many of the mosquitoes collected in this study were temporally and spatially associated with Ae. aegypti.
Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti (L.) (Diptera: Culicidae) is the main vector of dengue and chikungunya viruses, both of which have been associated with human disease in Yucatán State, México (García-Rejón et al. 2008; Diaz-Gonzalez et al. 2015). Aedes aegypti mosquitoes are common in Yucatán State, and larvae and pupae are often found inside disposable containers, buckets, tires, flower pots, vases, and stormwater drains/catch basins where present (Winch et al. 1992; García-Rejón et al. 2011; Arana-Guardia et al. 2014). Aedes aegypti occurs in a diverse range of habitats including residential premises, vacant lots, parking lots, and cemeteries (Baak-Baak et al. 2014a,b).
Immatures and adults of Ae. aegypti usually cohabit with other mosquito species (Baak-Baak et al. 2014b). During surveillance activities for dengue virus vectors, other mosquito species that are collected are not identified or registered. Approximately 18 to 20 genera and 225 to 247 species of mosquitoes are known to occur in México (Bond et al. 2014). Several species reported in México are important vectors of arboviruses that affect humans and domestic animals. For example, West Nile virus was detected in Culex quinquefasciatus Say in Nuevo León, northern México (Elizondo-Quiroga et al. 2005), and in Cx. nigripalpus Theobald and Cx. interrogator Dyar and Knab in Chiapas, southern México (Ulloa et al. 2009). Saint Louis encephalitis virus was detected in Cx. tarsalis Coquillett in Durango, northwestern México (Sudia et al. 1975), and Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus was identified in Cx. coronator Dyar and Knab and Anopheles pseudopunctipennis Theobald in Veracruz State (Scherer et al. 1971). A novel flavivirus, designated T´Ho virus, was detected in Cx. quinquefasciatus in Yucatán State (Farfán-Ale et al. 2009). Several orthobunyaviruses (Cache Valley, Cholul, South River, and Kairi viruses) were isolated from Ae. taeniorhynchus (Wiedemann) in Yucatán State (Farfán-Ale et al. 2009, 2010).
To obtain recent information on the culicid fauna of Yucatán State, all mosquitoes collected during our routine surveillance for Ae. aegypti and its associated viruses were identified and documented. Here, we provide an updated checklist of mosquito species that occur in Yucatán State.
Materials and Methods
Yucatán State (20.9678°N, 89.6217°W) is located in the Yucatán Peninsula of México and is bordered by Quintana Roo State and Campeche State ( http://www.merida.gob.mx/turismo/contenido/informacion/geografia.htm; last accessed Dec 2015). Yucatán State has a subtropical climate, and rainfall is highest from Jun to Oct (typically >100 mm rainfall per month) with sporadic rainfall occurring during the remainder of the year (García-Rejón et al. 2012).
Immature and adult mosquitoes were collected from Jul 2014 to Dec 2015 in 60 localities of Yucatán State (Fig. 1). A wide range of urban and rural settings were examined, including residential premises (48), cemeteries (5), tourist areas (4, including an archaeological site and a “cenote”), churches (3), forests (3), and a garbage dump site (1) located close to black mangroves (Avicennia germinans; Acanthaceae). Some sites were visited more frequently because we had previously shown that Ae. aegypti was particularly abundant at these locations. In this study, every study site located at a residential premise or tourist area was visited on a single occasion whereas all other sites were visited on two to more occasions. Locations of study sites were recorded using a global positioning system receiver (Garmin, Olathe, Kansas).
SAMPLING OF IMMATURE AND ADULT MOSQUITOES
Methods used to collect mosquitoes and the classification of container types have been described in previous studies (Nájera-Vázquez et al. 2004; García-Rejón et al. 2011). Nets, turkey basters, or pipettes were used to collect immatures from water-holding containers. Larvae and pupae were placed in plastic containers, labeled according to date, study site, and sample identification number, and transported to the Laboratorio de Arbovirología at Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán. A portion of the larvae were killed in hot water (60 °C); the remaining larvae were individually reared to obtain adults. Pupae were allowed to emerge as adults, and the adults were identified to species. Adult mosquitoes were collected using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention backpack-mounted aspirators. Stereomicroscopes and taxonomic keys were used to identify species (Carpenter & LaCasse 1955; Schick 1970; Arnell 1976; Clark-Gil & Darsie 1983; Ibáñez-Bernal & Martínez-Campos 1994; Darsie & Ward 2005).
SEARCH CHECKLIST OF MOSQUITO SPECIES OF YUCATÁN STATE
We carried out a literature review on mosquito species in Yucatán State in the following databases: Google Scholar, PubMed Health [National Center for Biotechnology Information at the National Library of Medicine], SciELO (Scientific Electronic Library Online), and Web of Science (Thompson Reuters). The search was conducted with the introduction of keywords such as Culicidae, mosquito fauna, mosquito surveillance, new records, mosquito distribution, Yucatán, and México.
Table 1.
Number of mosquito species registered in Yucatán State from Jul 2014 to Dec 2015.
Results
A summary of the mosquitoes collected in this study is in Table 1. We collected 8,218 specimens representing 7 genera and 27 species. These species represent ∼52% of all mosquito species known to occur in Yucatán State (references can be seen in Table 2). Three species had never before been identified in Yucatán State, and these are Aedes (Ochlerotatus) euplocamus Dyar & Knab, Aedes (Protomacleaya) podographicus Dyar & Knab, and Culex (Culex) declarator Dyar & Knab. We collected 4,406 immatures (4,062 larvae and 344 pupae) in 220 waterholding containers or natural breeding sites. We also collected 3,812 adult mosquitoes. The most common species were Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus (Fig. 1).
BIOLOGICAL NOTES
We provide notes for the 3 newly reported species. Information on their localities and ecological information is also provided.
Aedes euplocamus occurs in Colombia, Peru, Venezuela, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Guyana, Honduras, Panama, and México (Arnell 1976; Burkett-Cadena et al. 2013; Rozo-Lopez & Mengual 2015). In México, this species has been identified in the states of Veracruz (Arnell 1976), Quintana Roo (Ortega-Morales et al. 2010), and Oaxaca (Bond et al. 2014). Arnell (1976) performed a complete review of this species group (Aedes: Ochlerotatus: Scapularis): Larvae and pupae have been collected from water covered in partial shade and in rock-holes without vegetation. Aedes euplocamus often cohabits with Ae. aegypti and various Culex and Uranotaenia species (Arnell 1976). It is not considered to be a vector of pathogens of medical or veterinary importance. In the present study, we collected 2 females of Ae. euplocamus in a forest in Xmatkuil (20.8501747°N, 89.6002139°W), which is a small town close to Mérida City.
Table 2.
Checklist of the mosquito species known from Yucatán State and new records. Classification according to Knight & Stone (1977). Previous occurrence records are abbreviated: MI: Martini (1935); MP: Martínez-Palacios (1952); VA: Vargas (1956); VA-MP: Vargas & Martínez-Palacios (1956), WI: Winch et al. (1992); IB: Ibáñes-Bernal & Martínez-Campos (1994); NV: Nájera-Vázquez et al. (2004); ZP: Zapata-Peniche et al. (2007); GR-1: García-Rejón et al. (2008); FA-9: Farfán-Ale et al. (2009); FA-0: Farfán-Ale et al. (2010); GR-2: García-Rejón et al. (2011), OM-1: Ortega-Morales et al. (2011); GR-3: García-Rejón et al. (2012); MS: Manrique-Saide et al. (2012); AG: Arana-Guardia et al. (2014); BB: Baak-Baak et al. (2014a); NR: never reported in Yucatán.
The geographic distribution of Ae. podographicus encompasses Belize, Nicaragua, Panama, Costa Rica, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, México, and Venezuela (Schick 1970). In México, Ae. podographicus has been reported in the states of Campeche (Schick 1970), Chiapas (Bond et al. 2014), Jalisco (Martini 1935), Nayarit (Schick 1970), Oaxaca (Martini 1935; Schick 1970), Quintana Roo (Ortega-Morales et al. 2010), Guerrero (Cortés-Guzmán et al. 2013), and Tamaulipas (Ortega-Morales et al. 2015). Larvae and pupae have commonly been collected from tree holes (Schick 1970). Aedes podographicus is not known to vector any pathogens of medical or veterinary importance. Although Martini (1935) and Ibáñez-Bernal & Martínez-Campos (1994) reported the presence of Ae. terrens in Yucatan, there have not been further reports of this particular mosquito's species in México (Zavortink 1972; Darsie 1996). Therefore, it is arguable that the above mentioned authors could have mistakenly identified the more common mosquito Ae. podographicus, which has extensively been reported in Mexican territories. In the present study, we collected 3 adult females of Ae. podographicus in a forest in Xmatkuil (20.8501747°N, 89.6002139°W). We also collected larvae and pupae of Ae. podographicus in a tree hole in Tizimín City (21.1169106°N, 88.1334789°W), in the east of Yucatán. Immatures of Ae. aegypti were also present in the same collections.
Culex declarator has a very wide distribution ranging from southern Texas through to México, Central America, and South America. Older literature, such as Carpenter & LaCasse (1955), has named this species Cx. virgultus Theobald. In México, Cx. declarator has been identified in the states of Quintana Roo (Ortega-Morales et al. 2010), Guerrero (Bond et al. 2014), and Tamaulipas (Ortega-Morales et al. 2015). The larvae are found in a variety of habitats, including rock pools, swamps, cement drains, rot cavities in trees, and coconut husks (Carpenter & LaCasse 1955). Culex declarator is of public health importance. St. Louis encephalitis virus was detected in Cx. declarator in Trinidad (Aitken et al. 1964) and Brazil (Monath et al. 1980). Culex declarator is also considered to be a potential vector of Dirofilaria immitis, dog heartworm (Labarthe et al. 1998). In the present study, immatures of Cx. declarator were collected in rock holes in a rural area in Ekmul (20.9501358°N, 89.3336006°W), Tixkokob, and from a tire at a trash collection site (21.2667072°N, 89.7577778°W) located near black mangroves in Progreso City.
CHECKLIST OF MOSQUITO SPECIES KNOWN FROM YUCATÁN
Between 1935 (Martini 1935) and 2014 (Arana-Guardia et al. 2014; Baak-Baak et al. 2014b), we found 17 works related to the record and distribution of mosquito species in Yucatán State, representing 11 genera and 49 species. The addition of 3 more species brings the species count to 52. The highest richness of culicid taxa belongs to Aedes (17 species), Culex (16 species), Anopheles (7 species), and Psorophora (6 species) (Table 2).
Discussion
Dengue virus is endemic in Yucatán State, and recently chikungunya virus has been associated with human morbidity in this region (García-Rejón et al. 2008; Diaz-Gonzalez et al. 2015, Cigarroa-Toledo et al. 2016). Both of these viruses are primarily vectored by Ae. aegypti (García-Rejón et al. 2008; Diaz-Gonzalez et al. 2015). For this reason, we routinely monitor the activity of Ae. aegypti and its associated viruses in Yucatán State. In the present study, we identified 27 mosquito species that occupy the same niche as Ae. aegypti, including 3 species never before reported in Yucatán State: Ae. euplocamus, Ae. podographicus, and Cx. declarator. Globally, the family Culicidae comprises 3,549 species distributed among 112 genera (Harbach 2013). It was recently reported that 217 to 239 species and 15 to 16 genera of mosquitoes have been documented in México (Bond et al. 2014).
In an entomological investigation performed by Ibáñez-Bernal & Martínez-Campos (1994), 36 species of mosquitoes were identified in Yucatán State. Additionally, Vargas (1956) reported 9, Nájera-Vázquez et al. (2004) reported 16, and Farfán-Ale et al. (2009, 2010) reported up to 20 species of mosquitoes in Yucatán State.
It should be noted that most studies on mosquitoes have been carried out in Mérida, because it is the largest city in Yucatán State and the incidence of dengue is high in this location (García-Rejón et al. 2008). Previous studies have shown that immature mosquitoes of various species coexist with immatures of Ae. aegypti in disposable containers, buckets, tires, and storm-water drains in Mérida (Winch et al. 1992; Zapata-Peniche et al. 2007; Ortega-Morales et al. 2011; Manrique-Saide et al. 2012; Arana-Guardia et al. 2014; Baak-Baak et al. 2014b). Adult mosquitoes of various species often coexist with adults of Ae. aegypti inside houses in Mérida (García-Rejón et al. 2008). Currently, there are 33 species of mosquitoes registered in Mérida City (Baak-Baak et al. 2014b).
At the state level, Tamaulipas and Quintana Roo have the highest richness of culicid taxa with 82 and 76 species, respectively (Ortega-Morales et al. 2010, 2015), followed by Chiapas with 54 species (Bond et al. 2014). As noted earlier, the revised total for Yucatán State is now 52 species. However, additional species could be present within the state but have remained undetected because we usually use trapping methods and focus on sites that allow for the collection of high numbers of Ae. aegypti. Other states where entomological investigations have recently been performed are Guerrero with 38 species, Oaxaca with 34 species (Bond et al. 2014), and Colima with 28 species (Espinoza-Gomez et al. 2013).
In the present study, many of mosquitoes identified are capable of serving as vectors of pathogens affecting humans or domestic animals in México. A notable absence is Ae. (Stegomyia) albopictus (Skuse), previously recorded in the Yucatán Peninsula (Salomón-Grajales et al. 2012) but not found in the present study. Martini (1935) reported the identification of Anopheles intermedius (Peryassu), but Vargas & Martínez-Palacios (1956) considered it to be a misclassification and suggested that An. apicimacula Dyar and Knab had been collected. Notably, we collected An. albimanus Wiedemann and An. pseudopunctipennis; these are the main vectors of the parasite that causes malaria in southeastern México (Martini 1935; Vargas & Martínez-Palacios 1956). Additionally, we recorded Ae. taeniorhynchus, which is a major vector of D. immitis (dog heartworm) in Yucatán State (Manrique-Saide et al. 2010).
In the historical literature, it appears that some species of mosquitoes in Yucatán State were erroneously reported. For example, Vargas (1956) apparently collected Aedes (Ochlerotatus) punctor (Kirby), but this species is not considered to occur in México (Darsie 1996). Additionally, Ibáñez-Bernal & Martínez-Campos (1994) reported immatures of Aedes (Protomacleaya) triseriatus (Say). Recently, Sánchez-Trinidad et al. (2014) revised the geographical distribution of this species and concluded that it is only distributed in northern and central México. It is currently unclear as to which Toxorhynchites species occur in Yucatán State. Toxorhynchites (Lynchiella) theobaldi (Dyar and Knab) was reported by Vargas (1956) and Zapata-Peniche et al. (2007). However, Zavortink & Chaverri (2009) examined the status of Toxorhynchites species by their distinctive tarsal markings from several collections and suggested that Tx. moctezuma (Dyar & Knab) and Tx. hypoptes (Knab) had been collected instead. Additionally, the Mosquitoes of Middle America Project makes no mention of these species occurring in México (Heinemann & Belkin 1977). For convenience, Toxorhynchites species collected in our study were identified only to the genus level and will later be conclusively identified using molecular tools. We did not find mosquitoes of the genera Haemagogus, Mansonia, Deinocerites, and Wyeomyia, which have all previously been reported in Yucatán State. However, we provide valuable information on mosquito fauna temporally and spatially associated with Ae. aegypti in this region.
Acknowledgments
We thank the laboratory staff at Arbovirología of Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán for assistance with mosquito collections. The study was supported in part by the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología de México grant INFR-2014-01-225046. We are very grateful to Bradley J. Blitvich for his review of the English grammar in this manuscript.