Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2016 Influence of Various Farmland Habitats on Abundance of Taeniaptera (Diptera: Micropezidae)
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Stilt-legged flies play an important ecological role in the process of decomposition of organic matter and, on occasion, in the biological control of insects. Currently, there are 46 known species of Taeniaptera Macquart (Diptera: Micropezidae), and their occurrence is reported in various environments throughout the tropics. In contrast, population information on their temporal and spatial distribution is scarce in areas of the Cerrado biome in Brazil, where habitats are highly disturbed and fragmented by agricultural practices and, therefore, the abundance of the group may change. This study assessed abundance of Taeniaptera species in habitats associated with farmland, and determined the change in abundance throughout the year. The stiltlegged flies were sampled in various habitats, namely, organically produced vegetable crops, fallow areas, agroforestry, and native vegetation associated with 4 farms located in the Federal District. In each habitat, one Malaise trap was installed, which remained in place for 72 h, at 14 d intervals, from Mar 2012 to Feb 2013. In total, 486 individuals were collected and identified as members of the species T. lasciva (F.), T. annulata (F.), and Taeniaptera sp. The mean abundance of flies was highest in vegetable crops when compared with other habitats, and the abundance was relatively steady throughout the year. Among the habitats sampled, vegetable crop systems were the most suitable habitats for conserving Taeniaptera species.

The stilt-legged fly genus Taeniaptera Macquart is one of the most common taxa in the family Micropezidae (Diptera), and most of the species occur in the Neotropical region. Currently, 46 species are known in the world, of which 23 are reported from Brazil (Ferro & De Carvalho 2014; Catalogue of Life 2015). They are found in a variety of environments such as forest, meadows, marshes, woods, and wetlands (Albuquerque 1980a,b).

The species of this genus provide important ecosystem services by participating in the decomposition process of organic matter and in the biological control of insects. However, little is known about the feeding habits of larvae and adults of stilt-legged flies. Larvae of Taeniaptera annulata (F.) and T. lasciva (F.) have been reported in decaying banana stumps, in rotted roots of cassava, in decomposed fruit, in roots of fig trees, and in decaying sugarcane cuttings, whereas T. trivittata Macquart has been observed emerging from rotten Typha (Typhaceae) stems (Fischer 1932; Cresson 1938; Steyskal 1964; Silva et al. 1968; Marshall 2010). Adults of T. lasciva have been recorded as predators of sugarcane borer (Diatraea saccharalis [F.]; Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in Barbados (Bennett & Alam 1985).

Most studies on stilt-legged flies in Brazil are focused on taxonomy and systematics (Albuquerque 1980a,b, 1981; Albuquerque & Papavero 2002; Ferro & De Carvalho 2014; Harterreiten-Souza et al. 2014a). The first ecological study in the region was made by Albuquerque (1991), who described the Taeniapterinae fauna present on Maracá and Pacaraima islands, in Roraima State. However, information on environmental factors affecting the abundance of the group, especially in environments disturbed by agricultural practices, is lacking.

The Cerrado biome has predominantly savanna-like vegetation, and was classified as a “hot spot” of diversity in the tropical region (Oliveira & Marquis 2002). Nowadays, it is highly threatened by agricultural expansion, resulting in fragmentation of native vegetation and shifts in the landscape to a mosaic of disturbed plots (Klink & Machado 2005; Beuchle et al. 2015). In general, increased populations of insects were found in habitats with higher resource availability and food concentration (Haenke et al. 2009; Romabai devi et al. 2011; Amaral et al. 2013). Furthermore, the abundance may respond positively to an increase in air temperature and rainfall (Auad 2003; Silva et al. 2011).

The objective of this study was to compare the distribution of Taeniaptera species among different farmland habitats, namely, vegetable crops, fallow areas, agroforestry, and native vegetation, and to determine their abundance throughout the year. Our initial working hypothesis was that Taeniaptera populations may differ between different biotic and abiotic habitats associated with the farms. Knowledge of fly and habitat interactions may provide some insight into management of the environment that allows us to preserve the flies and their environmental relationships.

Materials and Methods

STUDY SITE

The study was conducted from Mar 2012 to Feb 2013 in areas within the Cerrado biome. The climate in the region of the study has a well-defined seasonal variation with a dry season from May to Sep, and a rainy season from Oct to Apr. In general, the average temperature ranges from 22 to 27 °C and precipitation averages 1,200 mm/yr. However, low temperatures (<15 °C) and relative humidity (<15%) can be observed during the dry season (Klink & Machado 2005).

Four organic farms that produce vegetables were selected for this study. They were located in Taguatinga (48.071233°S , 15.829178°W), Ceilândia (48.252683°S, 15.824447°W), Paranoá (47.641011°S, 15.761664°W), and Lamarão (47.497206°S, 15.974353°W) in the Federal District, Brazil. Sampling was conducted simultaneously in the habitats available on each farm, and all farms were sampled simultaneously in the same week. Vegetable crops, fallow, agroforestry, and native vegetation habitats were sampled in Taguantinga; vegetable crops, fallow, and agroforestry were sampled in Ceilândia; and vegetable crops, fallow, and native vegetation were available and sampled in Paranoá and Lamarão. One Malaise trap was installed in each habitat, and operated for 72 h at 14 d intervals. Voucher specimens of captured Taeniaptera species are housed in the Entomological Collection of Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade de Brasília.

HABITAT CHARACTERIZATION

Vegetable Crops

Vegetable crops were annuals with short phenological cycles (about 4 mo), intercropped or planted as monocultures, with a predominance of brassicas (e.g., collards, cauliflower, broccoli, cabbage), and other species such as lettuce, pumpkin, eggplant, chayote, corn, tomatoes, okra, and celery. These crops were irrigated by sprinkling. In addition, grasses (e.g., Brachiaria [Poaceae]) and weeds (e.g., Ageratum conyzoides [Asteraceae], Amaranthus deflexus [Amaranthaceae], A. spinosus [Amaranthaceae], Bidens pilosa [Asteraceae]) grew commonly in the neighborhood and inside the cultivated area. In this type of habitat, there is intensive land use and disturbance related to crop management (Henz & Alcântara 2009).

Fallow

Fallow is an interruption of agricultural activities to protect or improve soil quality. This interruption can be characterized by the temporary abandonment of the area, with a landscape dominated by grasses (e.g., Brachiaria), weeds (e.g., A. conyzoides, A. deflexus, A. spinosus, B. pilosa, Ricinus communis [Euphorbiaceae], Thitonia diversifolia [Asteraceae]), or by planting a cover crop with forage plants (e.g., Mucuna sp. [Fabaceae], Sorghum bicolor [Poaceae], Pennisetum americanum [Poaceae], Canavalia ensiformes [Fabaceae]) (Altieri 2012). This area was not irrigated.

Agroforestry

These areas are characterized by the presence of shrubs and trees, and serve to diversify the local landscape and increase interaction between the organisms for the conservation of species (Farrell & Altieri 2012). The plants vary in shape, size, and phenology, with low dependence on external inputs. Part of the vegetation is managed for food production, and tree species are maintained over time (Gliessman 2005). This area was not irrigated by sprinklers.

Native Vegetation

Native vegetation comprises predominantly mesophytic vegetation along the streams. The trees reach a height of approximately 20 m and tree cover of 80%. These areas are considered part of the legal conservation reserve and are important repositories of biodiversity in the Cerrado (Neto et al. 2005).

STATISTICAL ANALYSES

The sex ratio of each species was calculated and expressed as the percentage of males to females (male:female). The abundance of stiltlegged flies in different habitats was evaluated by Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance. Abundance distribution among the months was evaluated by Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance, and abundance between the dry (Jun to Sep) and rainy (Nov to Feb) seasons was compared using a separate-variance t test. All analyses were done in the software Statistica 7.1 (Statsoft, Inc. 2005).

Results

In total, 486 individuals representing 3 species of Taeniaptera were collected (T. lasciva, T. annulata, and Taeniaptera sp.) on farms during this study, as well as other species of micropezids, such as Mycropeza dactyloptera Harterreiten-Souza, Sujii & Pujol-Luz, Plocoscelus conifer (Hendel), Plocoscelus brevipennis (Walker), and Cliobata sp. Among Taeniaptera species, T. lasciva was more abundant than T. annulata and Taeniaptera sp. (H = 23.16; df = 2,148; P < 0.001), representing about 90% of the total sample population. Even with the predominance of a single species, all occurred in different localities in the Federal District.

The sex ratio of T. lasciva was 53:47, with a balanced proportion between males and females. The other species, T. annulata (5:95) and Taeniaptera sp. (11:89), were predominately females (Table 1).

The monthly abundance (mean ± SE) of Taeniaptera was higher in vegetable crops (17.17 ± 4.02) than fallow (3.25 ± 0.70), agroforestry (0.67 ± 0.22), and native vegetation (2.50 ± 0.51) (H = 28.99; df = 3,48; P < 0.0001) (Fig. 1). The mean abundance of Taeniaptera did not differ among the months (H = 4.88; df = 11,48; P = 0.937) or between the dry (Jun to Sep) and rainy seasons (Nov to Feb) (t = -0.23; df = 21,84; P = 0.821) (Fig. 2). Taeniaptera lasciva and T. annulata were collected throughout the whole year, whereas Taeniaptera sp. was collected only in the months of Mar, May, Sep, Nov, and Jan.

Table 1.

Number of flies and sex ratio (male:female) of Taeniaptera species collected in various farmland habitats in the Federal District, Brazil, Mar 2012 to Feb 2013.

t01_740.gif

Discussion

Taeniaptera lasciva was the most abundant species sampled, and this species displayed a balanced ratio between males and females. A balanced sex ratio confers a certain advantage for the species due to increased genetic variability and a reduction in the energy costs of looking for a sexual partner, which is particularly important for the survival of the population in a heterogeneous and constantly disturbed environment (Schowalter 2011). However, this sex ratio was not observed for T. annulata and Taeniaptera sp. Their sex ratio was consistent with the general pattern of micropezids, which usually display a higher prevalence of females than males (Albuquerque 1991). Although females of the latter 2 species were more abundant than males, individuals of both sexes were collected in various months throughout the year, suggesting reproductive synchronization or aggregation behavior among individuals, thereby contributing to the maintenance of the group's population over time (Begon et al. 2007).

The Taeniaptera species had wide regional distribution and were found in all environments of the agricultural landscape. However, vegetable cropping seems to favor the abundance of stilt-legged flies. In these areas, there is a predominance of herbaceous plants that harbor a variety of host insects, which can serve as a food source for both larvae and adults (Bennett & Alam 1985; Marshall 2010). There is limited information about the feeding habits of Taeniaptera, but a recent study published by Barnes (2015) showed that larvae of Compsobata univitta (Walker) can be grown on rotting lettuce and spinach, vegetables commonly found in these systems. The adults were also commonly found walking within and around cultivated plants (e.g., Brachiaria, C. ensiformes, Mucuna, juvenile T. diversifolia, R. communis, Ipomoea batatas [Convolvulaceae] and Colocasia esculenta [Araceae]), feeding on extrafloral nectaries, or drinking water retained by the leaves. These plants can contribute to a better quality of habitat in the agricultural landscape by providing food resources for these species.

Fig. 1.

Monthly abundance (mean ± SE) of Taeniaptera collected in various farmland habitats: vegetable crops (veg.), fallow, agroforestry (agrof.), and native vegetation (nat. veg.) in the Federal District, Brazil.

f01_740.jpg

Fig. 2.

Abundance distribution (mean ± SE) of Taeniaptera collected during Mar 2012 to Feb 2013 in various farmland habitats in the Federal District, Brazil.

f02_740.jpg

Agricultural environments with ecologically based agricultural practices, even with constant human disturbance, provided favorable conditions for the occurrence and establishment of Taeniaptera species. Vegetable crops associated with some vegetation diversification practices, such as polyculture and maintenance of weeds, sprinkler irrigation, and lack of pesticides, also may favor the abundance of Taeniaptera in relation to fallow, agroforestry, or native vegetation.

Although vegetable crops seemed to be the best habitat for Taeniaptera, the maintenance of the species in these areas may be interrupted due to constant disturbance resulting from agricultural practices such as frequent harvest and plant species turnover. In a landscape context, the fallow, agroforestry systems, and native vegetation can be alternative places to mitigate these effects and act as secondary habitats or refugia, contributing to the permanence and maintenance of the species over time. For example, crops of banana (Musa [Musaceae]), sugarcane (Saccharum [Poaceae]), and cassava (Manihot [Euphorbiaceae]) are commonly used in agroforestry systems (for more details see Harterreiten-Souza et al. 2014b) to diversify the product marketed by the farmer. After harvesting, the remains of these plants (trunks and foliage) are incorporated into the soil and can function as a breeding site that supports the development of Taeniaptera larvae (Fischer 1932; Cresson 1938; Silva et al. 1968; Marshall 2010).

The abundance of Taeniaptera did not vary significantly through the course of the year. This finding shows a certain plasticity of the group for the climatic variations of the region and agrees with the general distribution patterns found for Diptera in the Cerrado (Pinheiro et al. 2002; Silva et al. 2011).

Based on our observations, organically produced vegetable crops favored the abundance of Taeniaptera species. These crops can function as a primary habitat due to the availability of food resources (e.g., quantity and quality) and favorable soil and microclimate conditions arising from irrigation. However, the vegetation surrounding the cultivated area also appears to have a role in population dynamics, such as the dispersion of species among areas, thereby contributing to the conservation of species locally over time. A general pattern of abundance was found in this study, but the identifications of the mechanisms that affect directly the group still need to be evaluated.

Acknowledgments

We thank Carlos J. E. Lamas for access to collections of Micropezidae (Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil), Steve A. Marshall and Gustavo B. Ferro (University of Guelph, Canada) for helping us in the identifications of this species and for taxonomic clarifications concerning the group. We are also grateful for Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária's support in data collection and technical support. We thank Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico for its financial support of the project and the Post-Graduate Program of Ecology at the University of Brasilia and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento Pessoal de Nível Superior for a scholarship for the first author.

References Cited

1.

Albuquerque LP. 1980a. Estudos dos micropezídeos da Bacia Amazônica. I - Contribuição à sistemática de Micropezidae e estudo do gênero Taeniaptera Macquart, 1835 (Diptera - Acalyptratae). Acta Amazonica 10: 659–670. Google Scholar

2.

Albuquerque LP. 1980b. Estudo dos micropezídeos da Bacia Amazônica. II - Redescrição de três espécies e conhecimento de duas espécies novas para a ciência de Taeniaptera Macquart, 1835 (Diptera - Micropezidae). Acta Amazonica 10: 863–881. Google Scholar

3.

Albuquerque LP. 1981. Estudo dos micropezídeos da Bacia Amazônica. III - Conhecimento de uma nova espécie e redescrição de três espécies de Taeniaptera Macquart, 1835 (Diptera - Micropezidae). Acta Amazonica 11: 821–838. Google Scholar

4.

Albuquerque LP. 1991. Taeniapterinae da Ilha de Maracá e de uma localidade de Pacaraima, Roraima, Brasil. Acta Amazonica 21: 3–13. Google Scholar

5.

Albuquerque LP, Papavero N. 2002. Insecta - Diptera - Micropezidae (Calobatidae, Tylidae). Fauna da Amazônia Brasileira 26: 1–10. Google Scholar

6.

Altieri M. 2012. Agroecologia: bases científicas para uma agricultura sustentável, 3rd Edition. Expressão popular, AS-PTA, São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Google Scholar

7.

Amaral DSSL, Venzon M, Duarte MVA, Sousa FF, Pallini A, Harwood JD. 2013. Non-crop vegetation associated with chili pepper agroecosystems promote the abundance and survival of aphid predators. Biological Control 64: 338–346. Google Scholar

8.

Auad AM. 2003. Aspectos biológicos dos estágios imaturos de Pseudodorus clavatus (Fabricius) (Diptera: Syrphidae) alimentados com Schizaphis graminum (Rondani) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) em diferentes temperaturas. Neotropical Entomology 32: 475–480. Google Scholar

9.

Barnes JK. 2015. Biology and immature stages of Compsobata univitta (Walker, 1849) (Diptera: Micropezidae: Calobatinae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 117: 421–434. Google Scholar

10.

Begon M, Townsend CR, Harper JL. 2007. Ecologia de Indivíduos a Ecossistemas, 4th Edition. Artmed, Porto Alegre, Brazil. Google Scholar

11.

Bennett FD, Alam MM. 1985. An annotated check-list of the insects and allied terrestrial arthropods of Barbados. Caribbean Agricultural Research and Development Institute, Bridgetown, Barbados. Google Scholar

12.

Beuchle R, Grecchi RC, Shimabukuro IE, Seliger R, Eva HD, Sano E, Achard F. 2015. Land cover changes in the Brazilian Cerrado and Caatinga biomes from 1990 to 2010 based on a systematic remote sensing sampling approach. Applied Geography 58: 116–127. Google Scholar

13.

Catalogue of Life. 2015. Systema Dipterorum,  http://www.catalogueoflife.org (last accessed 2 Sep 2015). Google Scholar

14.

Cresson ET. 1938. The Neriidae and Micropezidae of America north of Mexico (Diptera). Transactions of the American Entomological Society 64: 293–366. Google Scholar

15.

Farrell JG, Altieri MA. 2012. Sistemas agroflorestais, pp. 281–304 In Altieri MA [ed.], Agroecologia: bases científicas para uma agricultura sustentável, 3rd Edition. Expressão popular, AS-PTA, São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Google Scholar

16.

Ferro GB, De Carvalho CJB. 2014. A pictorial key and diagnosis of the Brazilian genera of Micropezidae (Diptera, Nerioidea). Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 58: 52–62. Google Scholar

17.

Fischer CR. 1932. Contribuição para o conhecimento da metamorfose e posição systematica da família Tylidae (Micropezidae, Dipt.). Revista de Entomologia 2: 15–24. Google Scholar

18.

Gliessman SR. 2005. Agroecologia: processos ecológicos em agricultura sustentável, 3rd Edition. UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Brazil. Google Scholar

19.

Haenke S, Scheid B, Schaefer M, Tscharntke T, Thies C. 2009. Increasing syrphid fly diversity and density in sown flower strips within simple vs. complex landscapes. Journal of Applied Ecology 46: 1106–1114. Google Scholar

20.

Harterreiten-Souza ES, Sujii ER, Pujol-Luz JR. 2014a. A new species of the genus Micropeza Meigen (Diptera: Micropezidae) from Brazil. Zootaxa 3827: 392–396. Google Scholar

21.

Harterreiten-Souza ES, Togni PHB, Pires CSS, Sujii ER. 2014b. The role of integrating agroforestry and vegetable planting in structuring communities of herbivorous insects and their natural enemies in the Neotropical region. Agroforestry Systems 88: 205–219. Google Scholar

22.

Henz GP, Alcântara FA. 2009. Hortas: o produtor pergunta, a Embrapa responde. Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, Brasília, DF, Brazil. Google Scholar

23.

Klink CA, Machado RB. 2005. Conservation of the Brazilian Cerrado. Conservation Biology 19: 707–713. Google Scholar

24.

Marshall AS. 2010. Micropezidae (stilt-legged flies), pp. 805–813 In Brown BV, Borkent A, Cumming JM, Wood DM, Woodley NE, Zumbado MA [eds.], Manual of Central American Diptera. Volume 2. National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Canada. Google Scholar

25.

Neto PB, Mecenas VV, Cardoso ES. 2005. APA de Cafuringa: a última fronteira natural do DF/Distrito Federal. Secretaria de Meio Ambiente e Recursos Hídricos - Semarh, Brasília, Brazil. Google Scholar

26.

Oliveira OS, Marquis RJ. 2002. The Cerrados of Brazil. Columbia University Press, New York, New York. Google Scholar

27.

Pinheiro F, Diniz IR, Coelho D, Bandeira MPS. 2002. Seasonal pattern of insect abundance in the Brazilian cerrado. Austral Ecology 27: 132–136. Google Scholar

28.

Romabai devi Y, Kalita J, Singh TK. 2011. Biological control potential of an aphidophagous syrphid, Episyrphus balteatus De-Geer (Diptera: Syrphidae) on mustard aphid, Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.) (Homoptera: Aphididae) on cabbage ecosystem in Manipur. Journal of Experimental Sciences 2: 13–16. Google Scholar

29.

Schowalter TD. 2011. Insect Ecology: An Ecosystem Approach, 3rd Edition. Academic Press, New York, New York. Google Scholar

30.

Silva AGA, Gonçalves CR, Galvão DM, Gonçalves AJL, Gomes J, Silva MN, Simoni L. 1968. Quarto catálogo dos insetos que vivem nas plantas do Brasil, seus parasitos e predadores, Parte II, 1º Tomo. Ministério da Agricultura, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Google Scholar

31.

Silva NAP, Frizzas MR, Oliveira CM. 2011. Seasonality in insect abundance in the “Cerrado” of Goiás State, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 55: 79–87. Google Scholar

32.

StatSoft, Inc. 2005. STATISTICA (data analysis software system), Version 7.1,  http:www.statsoft.com (last accessed 31 Jan 2015). Google Scholar

33.

Steyskal GC. 1964. Larvae of Micropezidae (Diptera) including two species that bore in ginger roots. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 57: 292–296. Google Scholar
Érica Sevilha Harterreiten-Souza, José Roberto Pujol-Luz, and Edison Ryoiti Sujii "Influence of Various Farmland Habitats on Abundance of Taeniaptera (Diptera: Micropezidae)," Florida Entomologist 99(4), 740-743, (1 December 2016). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.099.0426
Published: 1 December 2016
JOURNAL ARTICLE
4 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top