Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2016 Determining the Best Pheromone-Baited Traps for Capturing Scyphophorus acupunctatus (Coleoptera: Dryophthoridae) in Mezcal Agave
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Three traps (TOCCI, TOCCIA, and container) lured with synthetic aggregation insect pheromone and food attractant, were evaluated in the capture of Scyphophorus acupunctatus Gyllenhal (Coleoptera: Dryophthoridae) under field conditions on mezcal agave in Guerrero, Mexico. TOCCI and TOCCIA traps were the most efficient for capturing migrant adults. Most of the captured specimens were females, so these traps can reduce future populations of this insect.

The agave weevil, Scyphophorus acupunctatus Gyllenhal (Coleoptera: Dryophthoridae), is the main pest on wild and cultivated agaves, Agave angustifolia Haw., and Agave cupreata Trel. and Berger (Asparagaceae) (González-Hernández et al. 2007; Aquino-Bolaños et al. 2014), and the tuberose crop Polianthes tuberosa L. (Asparagaceae) (Camino-Lavin et al. 2002) in Mexico. This insect has cryptic habits, with all of its life stages taking place inside host tissues (González-Hernández et al. 2007; Terán-Vargas et al. 2012) making its control difficult. Weevils can emerge and move from infested hosts to new plants to start an infestation (Figueroa-Castro et al. 2015). Therefore, control strategies can be directed mainly to immigrating adult weevils.

Sampling agave fields is complicated because leaves are succulent and rigid and end in a dangerous sharp terminal spine. Thus, the direct sampling method requires dissection of agave crowns (Solís-Aguilar et al. 2001), but it increases operating costs, as it is time consuming. On the other hand, the indirect method is by monitoring the immigrating weevil adults with a pheromone-based trapping system developed in blue agave (Agave tequilana Weber ‘Azul'; Asparagaceae) (Ruiz-Montiel et al. 2003, 2008; Rodríguez-Rebollar et al. 2012). Until now, 3 types of promising pheromone and food attractant based traps have been tested for monitoring agave weevil in Mexico; on Jalisco State's blue agave, the TOCCI and TOCCIA traps were evaluated by Bravo-Pérez (2009) and Figueroa-Castro (2014). A 20 L container trap was tested by Azuara-Domínguez et al. (2014), and a 5 L container trap was tested on P. tuberosa ‘Perla' (Asparagaceae) by López-Martínez et al. (2011) and García-Ramírez et al. (2014).

Fig. 1.

Handmade designs of traps evaluated for capturing agave weevil on “maguey espadín” in Guerrero, Mexico. (A) TOCCI trap, (B) TOCCIA trap, and (C) container trap. In the 2nd experiment, TOCCIA traps were buried in the soil to the level of the holes.

f01_790.jpg

Recently, the agave industry in Guerrero has increased to 1,814.41 ha with agaves “papalote” and “espadín” (SIAP 2016) dedicated to low technology mezcal production. Local farmers have requested more efficient traps to monitor the agave weevil under local environmental conditions. Here, we evaluated the 3 main types of pheromone and food baited traps used previously in Mexico for capturing immigrating S. acupunctatus adults in mezcal agave fields.

We performed 2 experiments in a 4-yr-old “maguey espadín” plantation at “El Rancho Frio” (18.386778°N, 99.166111°W; 1,120 m asl); this plantation is located at Quetzalapa, Guerrero, Mexico. The 1st experiment was performed from 16 Sep to 27 Nov 2015, and the 2nd experiment was performed during 2 mo from 27 Nov 2015 to 29 Jan 2016.

In the 1st experiment, we evaluated 3 types of traps to capture the agave weevil: 1) TOCCI trap (Fig. 1A) at ground level (as recommended by Figueroa et al. unpublished); 2) TOCCIA trap (Fig. 1B) at ground level as used by Figueroa-Castro (2014); and 3) a 4 L container trap (Fig. 1C) buried 5 cm in the soil as used by García-Ramírez et al. (2014). A completely randomized experimental design was used, and each trap was replicated 5 times. The distance between traps was 50 m, and traps were placed in a square distribution pattern as recommended by Figueroa-Castro et al. (2016). Traps were checked 5 times, i.e., every 15 d from 16 Sep to 27 Nov 2015.

In the 2nd experiment, the 2 traps with the best performance in experiment 1 were compared: TOCCI trap, and TOCCIA trap (buried at the level of “cones” for weevils entry). The experiment was established in a completely randomized design, and each treatment was replicated 6 times. The distance between traps was 50 m, and all traps were distributed in a square pattern as indicated previously. Traps were checked 4 times, every 15 d, from 27 Nov 2015 to 29 Jan 2016. In both experiments, on each date, we emptied the traps and collected the captured weevils.

The response variable was the average number of captured agave weevils per trap per evaluation date, and within each experiment. Captured weevils were taken to the laboratory for counting and sexing with a stereoscopic microscope (Motic® SMZ-168, British Columbia, Canada) (Ramírez-Choza 1993).

Each trap was baited with an S. acupunctatus synthetic aggregation pheromone dispenser (FeroComps, Mexico City, Mexico) plus 300 g of recently cut agave tissue (Figueroa-Castro et al. unpublished). The agave tissue was placed in a 0.5 L plastic container with 8 holes (0.5 cm diameter each), and sprayed with malathion (Malathion 1000®, Anajalsa, S. A. de C. V., Jalisco, Mexico) at doses of 10 mL/L of water. The pheromone dispenser was changed on a monthly basis, and the agave tissue was replaced biweekly.

All statistical analyses were performed using SAS statistical software (SAS Institute 2004). The data were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) using PROC GLM. Prior to ANOVA, data normality (Shapiro-Wilk test) and homogeneity of variances (Bartlett test) were tested and data transformation was not necessary for the 1st experiment. Treatment means were separated with a Tukey test (a = 0.05). For the 2nd experiment, data were transformed by √(x+0.5) and a t-test was performed. A chi-squared test was performed to determine differences in the number of females and males captured in both experiments.

In the 1st experiment, all 3 traps captured the agave weevil, although the TOCCI captured more weevils than TOCCIA and container traps (F = 5.84; df = 2,12; P = 0.0045) (Fig. 2). In the 2nd experiment, TOCCI vs. buried TOCCIA capture rates were not significantly different (F = 0.50; df = 1,10; P = 0.4843) (Table 1). The higher efficiency of the TOCCI trap has been consistently reported on blue agave in Jalisco (Bravo-Pérez 2009; Figueroa 2014), and our results support this result for agave “espadín” in Guerrero.

Fig. 2.

Mean (± SE) number and percentage by sex of Scyphophorus acupunctatus adults captured per trap biweekly in the TOCCI, TOCCIA, and container traps during the 1st experiment. Treatments with different letters are significantly different (P ≤ 0.05; ANOVA and Tukey's test at á = 0.05).

f02_790.jpg

Table 1.

Mean (± SE) number and percentage by sex of Scyphophorus acupunctatus adults captured per trap biweekly in TOCCI and TOCCIA traps during the 2nd experiment.

t01_790.gif

The low efficacy of container traps could be a result of a natural variation in weevil populations between the dates of the 1st and 2nd experiment (345 and 155 specimens collected in 1st and 2nd experiments, respectively). Apparently, container trap design could play a role in capturing agave weevils at high densities. In other crop species, López-Martínez et al. (2011) and García-Ramírez et al. (2014) deployed these traps for S. acupunctatus on P. tuberosa and captured up to 700 weevils per trap per wk. This aspect has not been adequately studied. Furthermore, we detected important disadvantages for container trap design in agave “espadín” as follows: many non-target Lepidoptera, Diptera, and Coleoptera species were collected; soapy water used in traps was an alternative source for wild fauna's hydration, affecting its efficacy; and some rodents consumed the captured weevils affecting the results.

In addition, we found that in the 1st experiment more females than males were captured (Fig. 2) in TOCCI traps (χ2 = 22.28, P = 0.0001), in TOCCIA traps (χ2 = 5.38, P = 0.02), and in container traps (χ2 = 17.73, P = 0.0001). Also, in the 2nd experiment more females than males were captured (Table 1) in TOCCI traps (χ2 = 20.25, P = 0.0001) and in TOCCIA traps (χ2 = 29.39, P = 0.0001). Differences between captures of females and males in pheromone-baited traps were reported also by Figueroa-Castro et al. (2013) on blue agave in Jalisco, and by Macedonio-Guevara (2015) in mezcal agave in Guerrero. Capturing large numbers of females has an important impact on future population densities of agave weevil, with the potential of reducing egg laying in agave crops.

We thank Daniel Castro Rodríguez, Timoteo Castro Rodríguez, and Luis Figueroa Ocampo for their assistance in the establishment and evaluation of experiments on their agave fields. Also, we thank Programa para el Desarrollo Profesional Docente (SEP PRODEP) for providing a Postdoctoral scholarship for the first author at the Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias at the Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos. Comments from 2 reviewers improved the manuscript.

References Cited

1.

Aquino-Bolaños T, Pozo-Velázquez E, Álvarez-Hernández U, Delgado-Gamboa JR. 2014. Plantas hospedantes del picudo del agave Scyphophorus acupunctatus (Gyllenhal) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) en Oaxaca, México. Southwestern Entomologist 39: 163–169. Google Scholar

2.

Azuara-Domínguez A, Terán-Vargas AP, Soto-Sandoval A, Aguilar-Paniagua NY, Martínez-Bolaños L. 2014. Evaluación del tipo de trampa, atrayente alimenticio y feromona de agregación en el trampeo del picudo del agave Scyphophorus acupunctatus Gyllenhal en Tamaulipas, México. Entomotropica 29: 1–8. Google Scholar

3.

Bravo-Pérez D. 2009. Evaluación de tipos de trampas con feromona de agregación sintética Tequilur® en el picudo del agave Scyphophorus acupunctatus Gyllenhal (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) en Amatitán, Jalisco. Unpublished professional thesis. Departamento de Parasitología Agrícola, Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Chapingo, Mexico. Google Scholar

4.

Camino-Lavin M, Castrejón-Gomez V, Figueroa-Brito R, Aldana-Llanos L, Valdes- Estrada ME. 2002. Scyphophorus acupunctatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) attacking Polianthes tuberosa (Liliales: Agavaceae) in Morelos, Mexico. Florida Entomologist 85: 392–393. Google Scholar

5.

Figueroa-Castro P. 2014. Factores asociados a la trampa y al atrayente, que influyen en la eficiencia del sistema de trampeo para el monitoreo del picudo del agave. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Postgrado en Fitosanidad, Colegio de Postgraduados, Montecillo, Mexico. Google Scholar

6.

Figueroa-Castro P, Solís-Aguilar JF, González-Hernández H, Rubio-Cortés R, Herrera- Navarro EG, Castillo-Márquez LE, Rojas JC. 2013. Population dynamics of Scyphophorus acupunctatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on blue agave. Florida Entomologist 96: 1454–1462. Google Scholar

7.

Figueroa-Castro P, González-Hernández H, Carrillo-Sánchez JL, del Real-Laborde JI, Solís-Aguilar JF, Rojas JC. 2015. Ambos sexos de Scyphophorus acupunctatus (Coleoptera: Dryophthoridae) pueden iniciar la colonización de la planta de agave (Asparagaceae). Acta Zoológica Mexicana (n.s.) 31: 495–497. Google Scholar

8.

Figueroa-Castro P, González-Hernández H, Carrillo-Sánchez JL, Solís-Aguilar JF, del Real-Laborde JI, Rojas JC. 2016. Effect of the height and distribution pattern of pheromone-baited traps on the capture of Scyphophorus acupunctatus (Coleoptera: Dryophthoridae) on blue agave. Florida Entomologist 99: 297–299. Google Scholar

9.

García-Ramírez MJ, López-Martínez V, Alia-Tejacal I, Andrade-Rodríguez M, Rojas JC. 2014. Influence of trap color and food bait on the catches of Scyphophorus acupunctatus by pheromone-baited traps in tuberose crop. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 87: 96–101. Google Scholar

10.

González-Hernández H, Solís-Aguilar JF, Pacheco-Sánchez C, Flores-Mendoza FJ, Rubio-Cortes R, Rojas JC. 2007. Insectos barrenadores del agave tequilero, pp. 39–67 In González-Hernández H, del Real-Laborde JI, Solís-Aguilar JF [eds.], Manejo de Plagas del Agave Tequilero. Colegio de Postgraduados and Tequila Sauza S.A. de C.V., Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico. Google Scholar

11.

López-Martínez V, Alia-Tejacal I, Andrade-Rodríguez M, García-Ramírez MJ, Rojas JC. 2011. Daily activity of Scyphophorus acupunctatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) monitored with pheromone-baited traps in a field of Mexican tuberose. Florida Entomologist 94: 1091–1093. Google Scholar

12.

Macedonio-Guevara A. 2015. Abundancia estacional del picudo del agave en plantaciones de agave mezcalero en Guerrero. Unpublished M.Sc. thesis. Postgrado en Fitosanidad, Colegio de Postgraduados, Montecillo, Mexico. Google Scholar

13.

Ramírez-Choza JL. 1993. Max del henequén Scyphophorus interstitialis Gylh. Bioecología y control. Serie : Libro Técnico. Centro de Investigación Regional del Sureste. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias. Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería y Recursos Hidráulicos, Mérida, Yucatán, Mexico. Google Scholar

14.

Rodríguez-Rebollar H, Rojas JC, González-Hernández H, Ortega-Arenas LD, Equihua- Martínez A, del Real-Laborde JI, López-Collado J. 2012. Evaluación de un cebo feromonal para la captura del picudo del agave (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Acta Zoológica Mexicana (n.s.) 28: 73–85. Google Scholar

15.

Ruiz-Montiel C, González-Hernández H, Leyva J, Llanderal-Cazares C, Cruz-López L, Rojas JC. 2003. Evidence for a male-produced aggregation pheromone in Scyphophorus acupunctatus Gyllenhal (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 96: 1126–1131. Google Scholar

16.

Ruiz-Montiel C, García-Coapio G, Rojas JC, Malo EA, Cruz-López L, del Real I, González-Hernández H. 2008. Aggregation pheromone of the agave weevil, Scyphophorus acupunctatus. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 127: 207–217. Google Scholar

17.

SAS Institute. 2004. SAS/STAT 9.1 User's Guide. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina. Google Scholar

18.

SIAP (Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera). 2016. Anuario Estadístico de la Producción Agrícola,  http://www.siap.gob.mx/cierre-de-laproduccion-agricola-por-estado (last accessed 4 Mar 2016). Google Scholar

19.

Solís-Aguilar JF, González-Hernández H, Leyva-Vázquez JL, Equihua-Martínez A, Flores-Mendoza FJ, Martínez-Garza A. 2001. Scyphophorus acupunctatus Gyllenhal, plaga del agave tequilero en Jalisco, México. Agrociencia 35: 663–670. Google Scholar

20.

Terán-Vargas AP, Azuara-Domínguez A, Vega-Aquino P, Zambrano-Gutiérrez J, Blanco-Montero C. 2012. Biological effectivity of insecticides to control the agave weevil, Scyphophorus acupunctatus Gyllenhal (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), in Mexico. Southwestern Entomologist 37: 47–53. Google Scholar
Pedro Figueroa-Castro, Víctor López-Martínez, Artemio Hernández-Ruiz, Francisca Silva-García, and Manuel Campos-Figueroa "Determining the Best Pheromone-Baited Traps for Capturing Scyphophorus acupunctatus (Coleoptera: Dryophthoridae) in Mezcal Agave," Florida Entomologist 99(4), 790-792, (1 December 2016). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.099.0437
Published: 1 December 2016
JOURNAL ARTICLE
3 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top