Patrick T. Gregory, Krysia N. Tuttle
Herpetologica 72 (1), 64-72, (1 March 2016) https://doi.org/10.1655/HERPETOLOGICA-D-15-00021
KEYWORDS: Antipredation, Colubridae, ontogenetic change, pregnancy, risk, thermoregulation
An animal’s decision to stay in a protective refuge or venture from it will depend on the exigencies of other necessary functions (e.g., feeding, breeding, thermoregulation), which often will interact themselves. In this study, we determined broad patterns of use of cover objects in five species of diurnal natricine snakes at two locations in Canada and one location in the UK. In particular, we focused on the influence of body size (larger snakes should incur less risk away from cover) and reproductive state (gravid snakes thermoregulate precisely and therefore should often bask) on the probability that a snake will be found in the open. As we predicted, body size influenced the likelihood of being in the open, both within and between species (one small species was almost always found under cover), even when we took time of day, season, or both into account. Such relationships are unlikely to be solely caused by the thermoregulatory role of cover, and we argue that small snakes sometimes sacrifice basking opportunities to take advantage of the protective qualities of cover. However, small snakes might use cover to avoid dehydration as well as predators. As we also predicted, gravid females were more likely to be in the open at a given body size than other snakes, but only in the three largest viviparous species; the smallest species and one oviparous species showed no such effect. In general, body size and reproductive state both determine cover-use behavior. Studies of use of other kinds of cover or refuges by snakes (e.g., vegetation, underground burrows), and of time spent under cover vs. in the open, would help test the generality of our conclusions.