BioOne.org will be down briefly for maintenance on 17 December 2024 between 18:00-22:00 Pacific Time US. We apologize for any inconvenience.
Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
3 December 2019 Incidental Fungi in Host Trees Disrupt the Development of Sirex noctilio (Hymenoptera: Siricidae) Symbiotic Fungus and Larvae
Lixiang Wang, Chunchun Li, Juan Shi, Chengcheng Li, Jiale Li, Lili Ren, Youqing Luo
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The woodwasp, Sirex noctilio Fabricius, is an exotic pest of Pinus L. in the southern hemisphere and North America, and it is an emerging threat in northeastern China. Adult woodwasps have numerous insect competitors for oviposition substrates, and developing larvae must compete for resources with other subcortical invaders. Its mutualistic fungus Amylostereum areolatum (Fr.) Boidon, is less competitive than many other fungal colonists present in pine ecosystems. This study investigated the effects of incidental, host-colonizing fungi on the growth and development of woodwasp larvae and A. areolatum. Fungi were isolated from dead S. noctilio larvae within galleries (primarily Trichoderma Pers, Ophiostoma Sydow, and Sphaeropsis Sacc.), and effects of these fungi on woodwasp brood survival were investigated via inoculations of S. noctilio-infested logs. Larval mortality was significantly increased in sample logs inoculated with Ophiostoma minus (Hedgc.) Sydow Phlebiopsis gigantea (Fr.) Jülich, Trichoderma atroviride Bissett, Trichoderma viride Pers, and Trichoderma harzianum Rifai. Inoculation of logs with O. minus resulted in the highest mortality and greatest reductions in wood moisture content. When grown on artificial media, these fungi grew faster than and inhibited growth of A. areolatum mycelium. We propose that the adverse effects of incidental fungi on the survival of S. noctilio larvae may be caused at least in part by an indirect mechanism involving inhibition of the fungal symbiont. The findings provide potentially valuable information for suppressing S. noctilio populations using microbial control agents.

Sirex noctilio Fabricius is native to Eurasia and North Africa, but has been accidentally introduced into several countries in the southern hemisphere, North America, and most recently China (Spradbery and Kirk 1978, Li et al. 2015a). Although considered a secondary pest of pine species in its native range, the wasp has attracted considerable attention due to its ability to kill a variety of pine species in regions where it has been introduced (Hurley et al. 2007, 2015; Batista et al. 2018). It was first detected in China in 2013, and by 2018, it was found that attacking Mongolian pine (Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica Litvinov) plantations spanning 22 cities in northeastern China and causing enormous economic and ecological losses (Li et al. 2015, Sun et al. 2016).

During oviposition, S. noctilio females inoculate the host tree with an obligate symbiotic fungus, Amylostereum areolatum (Fr.) Boidon (Basidiomycotina: Corticiaceae) that contributes to tree death and acts as an external gut for digestion of recalcitrant lignocellulosic compounds (Thompson et al. 2013, 2014). Along with the fungus, the wasp also injects a toxic mucus that affects tree defenses and assists the fungus in colonizing the host (Coutts and Dolezal 1969). Thus, insects, toxins, and fungi act together to damage host trees.

The management of S. noctilio is based on two components: 1) baited traps to monitor population levels and 2) biological control. Baited traps are important tools for population monitoring in helping to detect the woodwasps and time control measures (Hurley et al. 2015, Poisson et al. 2016). The parasitic nematode Beddingia (=Deladenus) siricidicola Bedding (Neotylenchidae) has provided the most successful control strategy for S. noctilio, attaining almost 100% parasitism and sterilization of female S. noctilio emerging from inoculated trap trees (Bedding 2009, 1972). Additionally, several parasitic wasps were introduced to Australia in the late 1980s to manage this pest, including Schlettererius cinctipes Cresson (Stephanidae) as well as species belonging to the genera Ibalia (Ibaliidae), Rhyssa (Ichneumonidae), and Megarhyssa (Ichneumonidae) (Taylor 1976). Ibalia leucospoides (Hochenwarth) is by far the most successful parasitoid and can significantly reduce Sirex populations (Collett and Elms 2009). Furthermore, Vega et al. (2009) found that application of environmentally friendly insecticides can play an important role in regulating pest populations. However, the level of control achieved generally is insufficient.

In Australia, effectiveness of biological control by Beddingia siricidicola was reduced by another exotic pest, the bark beetle, Ips grandicollis Eichhoff (Coleoptera: Scolytidea) (Yousuf et al. 2014a; Slippers et al. 2015). Ophiostoma ips, a blue stain fungus transmitted by the bark beetle, alters the tree moisture content, thereby influencing the survival, growth, and spread of B. siricidicola in the wood (Carnegie et al. 2006, Yousuf et al. 2014a). In China, infestations of the native bark beetles Ips sexdentatus Boerner, 1776 and I. acuminatus Gyllenhal, 1827 (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) are common during the flight season of S. noctilio (authors' personal observation) and are thought to make trees more susceptible to attack. Conversely, infestation of host trees by some weak plant pathogens, such as beetle-vectored blue stain fungi (Leptographium and Ophiostoma), can inhibit the growth of A. areolatum, and affect the feeding of nematodes on A. areolatum, thereby adversely impacting the nematode biocontrol program for the woodwasp (Wahl 2017; Wang et al. 2019).

Sirex noctilio larvae and their fungal symbiont have competitors for resources while developing in trees. Past research has shown that some fungal species are antagonistic toward A. areolatum but cannot completely replace colonies in the host tree (Coutts and Dolezal 1965, Ryan et al. 2011). Other studies have demonstrated that some species of wood-colonizing fungi completely overgrow the mycelium of A. areolatum, leading to its death (Wang et al. 2019). We hypothesized that some fungi may inhibit the growth of A. areolatum in the host tree, which could impede the development and survival of S. noctilio larvae in the natural environment.

No direct research has been conducted on these interactions or their implications. The objectives of the present study were 1) to identify fungi isolated from the surface of dead S. noctilio larvae in host trees (fungi infecting S. noctilio larvae in the host are herein referred to as incidental fungi), 2) to evaluate the ability of those fungi to inhibit the growth and development of S. noctilio larvae and influence the moisture content of the host tissue, and (3) to investigate interactions between A. areolatum and incidental fungi in artificial cultures.

Materials and Methods

Collection of S. noctilio Larvae Infected with Fungi

Larvae infected with fungi were obtained from trees in S. noctilioinfested plantations near the city of Yushu, China (44°43′52″ N, 126°55′7″ E). Mongolian pines naturally infested with S. noctilio were selected by observing typical oviposition symptoms (i.e., resin beads at each ovipositor insertion) and observation of larvae in split logs cut from these trees. Five trees were selected and cut into six to eight 1-m-long bolts and transferred to the sterile insect and quarantine room at Beijing Forestry University. Sirex noctilio larvae infected with fungi were collected from split bolts and preserved in sterilized centrifuge tubes and kept at 4–5°C until further study.

Isolation of Incidental Fungi from the Surface of S. noctilio Larvae

Fungal hyphae were removed from the surface of apparently colonized S. noctilio larvae with a sterile blade (on an ultra-clean bench) and cultured in potato dextrose agar (PDA) media amended with antibiotics streptomycin sulfate (100 mg/L), and tetracycline (50 mg/L) added to suppress bacterial growth. All isolates were incubated at 25 ± 1°C and 70 ± 5% relative humidity (RH) for 1–4 wk or until growth of mycelia. Agar cubes (∼1 mm3) were removed aseptically from the edge of colonies and transferred to fresh PDA plates. Each colony was transferred at least three more times until a visually uniform culture was obtained. Mycelia and spores were transferred to 20% glycerol in purified, distilled water (v/v) and stored at –80°C. Additionally, fungal cultures were generated on PDA slants in centrifuge tubes and stored under sterile mineral oil at 4°C.

Morphological and Molecular Identification of Incidental Fungi

Fungi were identified based on both morphology and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequencing. For initial identification using ITS sequencing, DNA was extracted from fungal mycelia on fresh cultures using an Extract-N-Amp tissue PCR kit (Sigma–Aldrich Corporation.St. Louis, MO) following the manufacturer's instructions. Fungal ribosomal ITS1, 5.8S (where present), and ITS2 regions were amplified using fungus-specific ITS1 and ITS4 primers (Gardes and Bruns 1993) in reactions (25 µl) containing 23 µl of Master Mix (Tsingke, China), 1 µl of each primer, and 1 µl of template DNA. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification was done with an initial denaturation step at 98°C for 2 min, followed by 30 cycles with denaturation at 98°C for 10 s, annealing at 50°C for 15 s, extension at 72°C for 15 s, and a final extension step of 5 min at 72°C.

PCR amplification products were separated by electrophoresis on 1% (w/v) agarose gels and stained with ethidium bromide for visual examination. PCR products were purified by using an agarose gel DNA extraction kit (Takara, Japan) and sequenced at Qinke Biotech (Beijing, China). The resulting sequences were used in BLAST searches of GenBank ( http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi), and sequences sharing ≥99% similarity with a partial 28S rDNA sequence (∼600 bp) were considered to represent identical species (Wu et al. 2013). When sequences shared <99% similarity with known species, morphological features were used to identify the fungi. Specifically, mycelium morphology, mycelium surface texture, colony color, production of pigments and their diffusion in the medium, spore production, and mycelium growth rate on PDA plates were evaluated. Fungi that did not sporulate on this medium were transferred onto a different artificial medium (water 400 ml, phloem 15 g, agar 15 g) to activate sporulation (Wang et al. 2012). Morphology (size, color, shape, and ornamentation) of conidiomata, conidiogenous cells, conidiophores, and conidia were evaluated for the anamorph; sporomata and their associated structures as well as spore morphology were evaluated for the teleomorph (Saucedo-García et al. 2014).

Effects of Fungal Inoculation on S. noctilio Larval Development in Naturally Infested Bolts

Ten Mongolian pine trees (with >30 clear resin beads observed on each tree) were obtained from the S. noctilio-infested P. sylvestris var. mongolica plantation in Yushu (44°43′52″ N, 126°55′7″ E), in April 2017. These trees were cut into 1.2-m-long bolts (>15 cm diam). After sealing the cut ends with wax, bolts were transferred to the insect quarantine room at Beijing Forestry University. The diameter was measured and recorded to ensure that growth conditions in sample logs inoculated with each fungus were similar. Lengthwise lines of six, 6-mm diameter holes (∼20 cm apart) were drilled to a depth of ∼4 cm with a sterile increment borer (Haglof, Sweden; Hartshorn et al. 2017). Three parallel lines of holes (at 120° intervals around the circumference) were drilled per log (18 holes in total;  Supp Fig. 1 [online only]; Carnegie and Bashford 2012). To ensure a sterile environment, surfaces of the quarantine room were exposed to ultraviolet light for 30 min before drilling inoculations. The six primary fungi isolated from S. noctilio (Trichoderma harzianum Rifai 1969, Trichoderma atroviride Bissett 1984, Trichoderma viride Pers 1794, Sphaeropsis sapinea (Fr.) Dyko 1980, Ophiostoma minus (Hedgc.) Sydow 1919, and Phlebiopsis gigantea (Fr.) Jülich 1978) and the symbiont A. areolatum (extracted from S. noctilio female mycangia; Boros 1968) were used as inoculum. Pairs of mycelial plugs (diameter = 5 mm) of actively growing fungi were then inoculated into each hole. Holes inoculated with two plugs of sterile PDA media served as negative controls. One fungal species was inoculated onto any single bolt. Three independent replicates (inoculation of three sample logs) were performed for each fungus and control. Holes inoculated with fungi or controls were then filled with sterilized sawdust from the xylem of Mongolian pine and sealed with foam rubber. All logs were wrapped in plastic film and incubated at 25 ± 3°C and 65 ± 5% RH.

We gravimetrically measured the moisture content of the sample logs before and after inoculation. For each bolt, six fresh wood cores (a single line) removed during creation of inoculation sites were weighed; then cores were placed in an aluminum dish inside a dehydrator and dried at 105°C for 48 h before being re-weighed. After 2 mo of incubation, 10 wood cores (6-mm diam.) were sampled throughout the length of each inoculated log (one sample every 12 cm), and their moisture content was measured as per the preinoculation samples (Yousuf et al. 2014b). Following collection of the second set of cores, S. noctilio larvae were dissected from logs and the numbers of individuals with or without visible fungal growth was determined. These fungi were isolated and identified according to the methods described previously.

Fungal Growth Rate

The six predominant fungal species isolated from dead S. noctilio larvae as well as A. areolatum were grown singly on PDA media in an incubator at 25 ± 1°C and 70 ± 5% RH. After 7 d, mycelium plugs from the edge of each fungal colony were removed with a sterile punch (4-mm diam.) and placed at the center of a fresh 9-cm diameter Petri plate containing PDA media. Mycelial growth was measured daily by using the crossing method (Li et al. 2015b). Growth generally reached the edge of the Petri plate after 7 d. Each experiment was replicated five times.

Effects of Incidental Fungi on Growth of A. areolatum in Artificial Media

The in vitro activity of fungi isolated from dead S. noctilio larvae against A. areolatum was determined using dual culture assays (Cottyn et al. 2001). Two mycelial plugs (4-mm diam.) of incidental fungi (prepared as above) were placed at opposite ends of a 9-cm diameter Petri plate and 10 mm from the edge of the plate. A plug of A. areolatum was placed at the center of the plate. Because the growth rate of A. areolatum was much slower than for the incidental fungi (Wang et al. 2019), A. areolatum was inoculated 3 d earlier. Plates inoculated with A. areolatum alone served as controls. Each treatment was repeated three times, and all plates were incubated at 25°C for 7 d. Radial growth of incidental fungi and A. areolatum was recorded daily, and inhibition was evaluated using the formula:

e01_832.gif

where P is the percent growth inhibition, C is the A. areolatum colony radius in controls, T is the A. areolatum colony radius in dual cultures, and d is the radius of the mycelial plug.

Statistical Analysis

Isolation frequency (IR%) was calculated as the number of times a species was isolated divided by the total number of samples incubated (Fröhlich et al. 2000). Fungal prevalence was calculated as the isolation frequency of a given species divided by the sum of the isolation frequencies of all fungi (Wang and Guo 2007). The moisture content of the sample logs could not be transformed to meet assumptions, therefore, comparison of the moisture content of the sample logs before and after inoculation for all fungi was achieved with a nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis test. One-way analysis of variance was used to analyze parameters measured in fungal growth rate experiments and effects of incidental fungi on growth of A. areolatum. Differences between treatment means were evaluated using Tukey's honestly significant differences (HSD) tests. Pairwise comparisons between the mortality of S. noctilio larvae in logs treated with different fungi and those of the control group were analyzed with a normal approximation of the Pearson's χ2-test.

Results

Morphological and Molecular Identification of Incidental Fungi

In total, 114 fungal isolates were obtained from the surfaces of 127 dead S. noctilio larvae in host trees. Fungi were assigned to 27 representative morphotypes based on cultural characteristics, and isolates were identified as 12 species within 9 genera based on rRNA gene ITS sequences or morphological features (Table 1). Among the nine genera, 8 (11 species) were within the phylum Ascomycota, and 1 was within Basidiomycota (1 species). The most abundant genera were Trichoderma (53.5%), Sphaeropsis (15.8%), and Ophiostoma (11.4%). The most frequently isolated fungal species were Trichoderma harzianum, T. atroviride, T. viride, Sphaeropsis sapinea, Ophiostoma minus, and Phlebiopsis gigantea.

Effects of Fungal Inoculation on S. noctilio Larval Development in Naturally Infested Bolts

Pairwise comparisons showed that the mortality of S. noctilio larvae was significantly lower in the control bolts than in bolts treated with O. minus, T. atroviride, T. viride, P. gigantea, or T. harzianum; but not bolts treated with A. areolatum or S. sapinea (Table 2). Fungi isolated from dead larvae were generally the same as in the inoculum used for the bolt, and these included T. harzianum, T. atroviride, T. viride, and P. gigantea (Table 2). Trichoderma atroviride had the highest frequency of re-isolation (87%). In contrast, in bolts inoculated with O. minus, this fungus was isolated from only 47% of 32 dead larvae, and the other dead larvae failed to show signs of O. minus infection. Amylostereum areolatum was not isolated from the surface of dead larvae. When S. noctilio larvae were colonized by O. minus or S. sapinea, their bodies turned black, but bodies were yellow/green when colonized by Trichoderma (see  Supp Fig. 2 [online only]).

The moisture content of bolts before fungal inoculation did not differ significantly (χ2 = 7.74, df = 7, P = 0.356; Fig. 1). However, 2 mo after inoculation with fungi, the moisture content of bolts differed significantly among treatments (χ2 = 31.46; df = 7; P < 0.01). Only O. minus bolts lost moisture at a significantly higher rate than controls (Fig. 1).

Table 1.

Isolation frequency (IR%) and dominance of fungi isolated from the surface of dead Sirex noctilio larvae in naturally colonized trees

img-AGmE_832.gif

Growth rates on artificial media differed significantly among the seven fungi (F = 174.7, df = 6, P < 0.01; Table 2). Sphaeropsis sapinea exhibited the fastest growth rate (11.7 ± 0.3 mm/d), whereas A. areolatum displayed the slowest growth rate (3.1 ± 0.2 mm/d). No significant differences in growth rate were noted among the three Trichoderma species (F = 2.28, df = 2, P > 0.05).

Effects of Incidental Fungi on Growth of A. areolatum in Artificial Media

In dual culture assays, the six fungal isolates varied in their capacity to reduce A. areolatum growth (F = 860.1, df = 5, P < 0.01; Fig. 2). Four fungi, P. gigantea, T. viride, T. harzianum, and T. atroviride continued to grow after encountering A. areolatum mycelium (Fig. 3), and eventually completely covered the latter ( Supp Fig. 3 [online only]). Trichoderma atroviride and T. harzianum exhibited the strongest inhibitory effect. However, O. minus and S. sapinea displayed low antagonistic ability against A. areolatum, and a confrontation situation was observed when the two fungi and A. areolatum met (see  Supp Fig. 3 [online only]). Confrontational behavior was observed for 15 d, during which the size of fungal colonies remained unchanged, even though colonies appeared healthy.

Discussion

Twelve fungal species and nine genera were isolated from dead S. noctilio larvae in colonized Mongolian pine trees. Trichoderma, Sphaeropsis, and Ophiostoma were the most abundant genera among the isolates, and most fungal species were the same as those isolated in a previous study from Mongolian pine trees displaying woodwasp damage (Wang et al. 2016). The present study is the first report that fungal species which occur incidentally (i.e., that are non-symbionts) in S. noctilio-colonized trees can affect the survival of S. noctilio larvae.

Previous research demonstrated that some fungi affect the female adult woodwasp's selection of oviposition sites and inhibit the mycelial growth of A. areolatum. In previous surveys, we also found that some dead larvae were infected with fungi in host trees. Thus, we hypothesized that some fungi also may affect the development and survival of S. noctilio larvae in host tree. Our bioassays of the effects of certain incidental fungi present on cadavers of S. noctilio larvae showed that inoculation of these fungi into bolts of pine naturally colonized by S. noctilio reduced larval survival, and furthermore, these fungi could inhibit growth of the fungal symbiont of S. noctilio on artificial media.

In our study, test fungi included common saprophytes (Trichoderma sp. and P. gigantea) and opportunistic pathogens of Pinus spp. (S. sapinea and O. minus). The mortality rates of S. noctilio larvae varied among fungal species tested, and fungal species inhibited the mycelial growth of the woodwasp's symbiont A. areolatum to varying degrees.

The present study found that S. noctilio-colonized bolts inoculated with the blue stain fungus O minus exhibited higher larval mortality than bolts treated with other fungi. However, O. minus was re-isolated from only 47% of dead larvae in O. minus-treated bolts (Table 2), and other dead larvae had no signs of O. minus colonization. Previous research found that survival of Dendroctonus frontalis Zimmermann larvae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) in galleries is negatively impacted by growth of O. minus, a fungal symbiont of the beetle's phoretic mites that competes with the beetle's fungal mutualist, Entomocorticium sp. (Scott et al. 2008). Similarly, death of S. noctilio larvae could have been due in part to interference by O. minus with growth and persistence of the woodwasp's fungal symbiont A. areolatum, which is essential for the woodwasp's capacity to derive nutrients from host wood (Thomson 2014). Consistent with this hypothesis, O. minus was antagonistic to growth of A. areolatum in petri plates (Fig. 2). However, it was a weaker inhibitor than four of the other tested fungi, and, unlike these other fungi, it did not overgrow A. areolatum colonies (Fig. 2).

Table 2.

Virulence of incidental fungal isolates against the survival of Sirex noctilio larvae

img-z5-2_832.gif

Fig. 1.

Moisture levels in test logs at time of inoculation with fungi and 2 mo afterward. Asterisk denotes a significant change in moisture content occurred from inoculation with O. minus (Kruskal–Wallis test, α= 0.05) but not other fungi. .

img-z5-9_832.jpg

Yousuf et al. (2014b) found that wood colonized by blue stain fungi dries more quickly. Wood moisture content is an important factor that directly affects S. noctilio survival, growth, and development (Madden and Coutts 1979), and thus, reduction of the wood moisture content by O. minus growth could have reduced larval survival. Therefore, we propose that O. minus growth negatively impacts S. noctilio larvae through at least two possible mechanisms: first, by directly inhibiting growth of the larvae's symbiont A. areolatum, and second, by reducing wood moisture content and thereby interfering indirectly with both larval and symbiont development ( Supp Fig. 4 [online only]; Scott et al. 2008; Hurley et al. 2012). In addition, S. noctilio larvae have a fully enclosed growing environment in host trees and will die if they leave the gallery. Therefore, it is not certain that the O. minus is directly infecting and killing the larvae. The negative impacts of O. minus on S. noctilio are implied by the previously reported avoidance of fungus-colonized tissue by S. noctilio. Adult female S. noctilio rarely oviposit in areas previously colonized by blue stain fungi (Foelker 2016), and presence of Ophiostoma and Trichoderma can inhibit Sirex oviposition at localized sites on trees (Spradberry and Kirk 1978, Schubert et al. 2008). Galleries of S. noctilio larvae generally avoid wood colonized by blue stain fungi (Coutts 1969, Yousuf et al. 2014a). Furthermore, volatiles produced by O. minus have a repellent effect on wasps (Wang et al. 2019).

Fig. 2.

Inhibition of growth of A. areolatum (see text for description of this measurement) when grown in culture with different incidental fungal associates of S. noctilio. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (Tukey's HSD test; α = 0.05).

img-z5-13_832.jpg

Fig. 3.

Colony growth by test fungi during 5 d after encountering the A. areolatum colony. Mean growth distances (bars) associated with different letters were significantly different (Tukey's HSD test; α = 0.05).

img-z6-1_832.jpg

Likewise, the present study found that S. noctilio larvae in bolts inoculated with Trichoderma spp. or P. gigantea had significantly higher mortality (41.8–58%) than larvae in control bolts (16.2%), and these same fungi were re-isolated from the body surfaces of the majority of dead larvae in these respective fungal treatments. As with P. gigantea, Trichoderma species may increase larval mortality by inhibiting growth of Amylosterium or possibly even killing the fungus. Previous studies demonstrated that several enzymes produced by Trichoderma species possess antibiotic activity against fungal pathogens of plants (Howell 2003). Furthermore, Trichoderma spp. and P. gigantea have been successfully employed as biocontrol agents for the treatment of pruning wounds on urban trees to prevent colonization by wood decay fungi (Schubert et al. 2008). Additionally, T. atroviride, T. viride, T. harzianum, and P. gigantea completely covered the mycelia of A. areolatum in Petri plate assays. This suggests that these fungi can also cover substrates previously colonized by A. areolatum in host trees. We also found that Trichoderma spp. and P. gigantea exhibit faster growth rates than A. areolatum, and thus, these species might occupy and monopolize suitable host tissue before A. aereolatum.

No significant differences were noted between the control group and A. areolatum or S. sapinea groups in terms of larval mortality. This is not surprising since S. sapinea is a weak pathogen (Stanosz 1997). In previous studies, S. sapinea was found to be a less aggressive competitor of A. aereolatum than species of the genus Trichoderma (Stanosz 1997, Wang et al. 2019).

The influence of co-habiting pine insects on the survival of S. noctilio larvae is likely to be indirect (Ryan et al. 2012). Yousuf et al. (2014a,b) correlated the presence of I. grandicollis with smaller Sirex broods, higher larval mortality, reduced Amylostereum growth, and ineffective parasitism by D. siricidicola. This disruption of Sirex development is likely due to the Ips-associated fungus Ophiostoma ips (Rumb.) outcompeting A. areolatum and causing the host substrate to become otherwise unsuitable for Sirex development. In northeast China, a variety of insect species colonize Mongolian pine, creating competition for resources with Sirex. Native bark beetles I. sexdentatus and I. acuminatus can transmit their associated blue stain fungus O. minus and produced these effects in Mongolian pine. Ophiostomatoid (which includes blue stain) fungi are commonly vectored by bark beetles, and these fungi can kill resin canal cells and ray parenchyma of host trees (Edmonds et al. 2011). Ophiostoma minus can block water flow in the xylem, thereby reducing wood moisture and making the habitat inhospitable for S. noctilio larvae. The findings demonstrate the potential for incidental fungi as biological control agents for S. noctilio and highlight the need for more fundamental research for understanding the ecological relationships among incidental fungi, the symbiotic fungus A. areolatum, and the pest S. noctilio.

Supplementary Data

Supplementary data are available at Journal of Economic Entomology online.

Acknowledgments

We thank Zijin Zheng and Feng Zhou for their assistance with sample collection, and workers of the Forestry Bureau in Yushu city for their assistance with fieldwork. This work was supported by the Beijing Science and Technology Planning Project (Z171100001417005) and the Chinese National Natural Science Foundation (31500529).

References Cited

1.

Batista, E. S. P., R. A. Redak, A. C. Busoli, M. B. Camargo, and J. D. Allison. 2018. Trapping for Sirex woodwasp in Brazilian pine plantations: lure, trap type and height of deployment. J. Insect. Behav. 31: 210–221. Google Scholar

2.

Bedding, R. A. 1972. Biology of Deladenus Siricidicola (Neotylenchidae) an Entomophagous-Mycetophagous Nematode Parasitic in Siricid Woodwasps. Nematologica. 8: 482–493. Google Scholar

3.

Bedding, R. A. 2009. Controlling the pine-killing woodwasp, Sirex noctilio, with Nematodes. Use of microbes for control and eradication of invasive arthropods. Springer, NED, New York. Google Scholar

4.

Boros, C. B. 1968. The relationship between the woodwasp, Sirex noctilio F. and the wood-rot fungus Amylostereum sp. M.Ag.Sc dissertation, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia. Google Scholar

5.

Carnegie, A. J., and R. Bashford. 2012. Sirex woodwasp in Australia: current management strategies, research and emerging issues. In B. Slippers, M. J. Wingfield, P. de Groot (eds.), The Sirex Woodwasp and its fungal symbiont: research and management of a worldwide invasive pest. Springer, New York. pp. 287–295. Google Scholar

6.

Carnegie, A. J., M. Matsuki, D. A. Haugen, B. P. Hurley, R. Ahumada, and P. Klasmer. 2006. Predicting the potential distribution of Sirex noctiliom (Hymenoptera: Siricidae), a significant exotic pest of Pinus plantations. Ann. For. Sci. 63: 119–128. Google Scholar

7.

Chen, X. L., J. F. Li, L. L. Zhang, J. F. Zhang, and A. Wang. 2014. Biocontrol Efficacy and Phylogenetic Tree Analysis of a New Bionectria ochroleuca Strain. Biotechnol. Bull. 5: 184–189. Google Scholar

8.

Chirame, B. B., and D. N. Padule. 2005. Effect of Trichoderma Spp. on the growth of Colletotrichum capsici isolated from cotton seed. Agric. Sci. Digest Res. J. 25: 215–216. Google Scholar

9.

Collett, N. G., and S. Elms. 2009. The control of Sirex wood wasp using biological control agents in Victoria, Australia. Agric. For. Entomol. 11: 283–294. Google Scholar

10.

Cottyn, B., E. Regalado, B. Lanoot, M. De Cleene, T. W. Mew, and J. Swings. 2001. Bacterial populations associated with rice seed in the tropical environment. Phytopathology. 91: 282–292. Google Scholar

11.

Coutts, M. P. 1969. The mechanism of pathogenicity of Sirex noctilio on Pinus radiata. Effects of the symbiotic fungus Amylostereum sp. (Thelephoraceae). Austr. J. Biol. Sci. 22: 915–924. Google Scholar

12.

Coutts, M. P., and J. E. Dolezal. 1965. Sirex noctilio, its associated fungus, and some aspects of wood moisture content. Austr. For. Res. 1: 3–13. Google Scholar

13.

Coutts, M. P., and J. E. Dolezal. 1969. Emplacement of fungal spores by woodwasp, Sirex noctilio, during oviposition. For. Sci. 15: 412–416. Google Scholar

14.

Du, L., X. Yang, T. Zhu, F. Wang, X. Xiao, H. Park, and Q. Gu. 2009. Diketopiperazine alkaloids from a deep ocean sediment derived fungus Penicillium sp. Chem. Pharm. Bull. (Tokyo). 57: 873–876. Google Scholar

15.

Edmonds, R. L., J. K. Agee, and R. I. Gara. 2011. Forest health and protection, Waveland Press, Inc, Long Grove, IL. Google Scholar

16.

Foelker, C. J. 2016. Beneath the bark: associations among Sirex noctilio development, bluestain fungi, and pine host species in North America. Ecol. Entomol. 41: 676–684. Google Scholar

17.

Fröhlich, J., K. D. Hyde, and O. Petrini. 2000. Endophytic fungi associated with palms. Mycol Res.104: 1202–1212. Google Scholar

18.

Gardes, M., and T. D. Bruns. 1993. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes–application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol. Ecol. 2: 113–118. Google Scholar

19.

Hartshorn, J., L. D. Galligan, A. J. W. Lynn-Miller, F. M. Stephen, J. Hartshorn, and L. D. Galligan. 2017. Sirex nigricornis (Hymenoptera: Siricidae) oviposition preference and development in relation to host age, and a novel live-trapping system for wood-borers. Great Lakes Entomol. 49: 173–183. Google Scholar

20.

Howell, C. R. 2003. Mechanisms employed by Trichoderma species in the biological control of plant diseases: the history and evolution of current concepts. Plant Dis. 87: 4–10. Google Scholar

21.

Hurley, B. P., B. Slippers, and M. J. Wingfield. 2007. A comparison of control results for the alien invasive woodwasp, Sirex noctilio, in the southern hemisphere. Agric. For. Entomol. 9: 159–171. Google Scholar

22.

Hurley, B. P., H. J. Hatting, M. J. Wingfield, K. D. Klepzig, and B. Slippers. 2012. The influence of Amylostereum areolatum diversity and competitive interactions on the fitness of the Sirex parasitic nematode Deladenus siricidicola. Biol. Control. 61: 207–214. Google Scholar

23.

Hurley, B. P., J. Garnas, and M. F. Cooperband. 2015. Assessing trap and lure effectiveness for the monitoring of Sirex noctilio. Agric. For. Entomol. 17: 64–70. Google Scholar

24.

Li, D., J. Shi, M. Lu, L. Ren, C. Zhen, and Y. Luo. 2015. Detection and Identification of the Invasive Sirex noctilio (Hymenoptera: Siricidae) Fungal Symbiont, Amylostereum areolatum (Russulales: Amylostereacea), in China and the Stimulating Effect of Insect Venom on Laccase Production by A. areolatum YQL03. J. Econ. Entomol. 108: 1136–1147. Google Scholar

25.

Li, Y. L., Z. Zhou, J. F. Lou, Y. J. Hu, and M. J. Shi. 2015b. Biological Characteristics of Chaetomella sp. (Sphaeropsidaceae), A Novel Causal Agent of Sansevieria Leaf Spot Disease. Sci. Silvae Sin. 51: 1001–7488. Google Scholar

26.

Madden, J. L., and M. P. Coutts. 1979. The role of fungi in the biology and ecology of woodwasps (Hymenoptera: Siricidae). In L. R. Batra (ed.), Insect-fungal symbiosis. Allanheld, Osmun and Co, Totowa, NJ. Google Scholar

27.

Martinez, C., P. De Geus, M. Lauwereys, G. Matthyssens, and C. Cambillau. 1992. Fusarium solani cutinase is a lipolytic enzyme with a catalytic serine accessible to solvent. Nature. 356: 615–618. Google Scholar

28.

Poisson, M. A., R. Ahumada, A. O. Angulo, F. Munoz, and E. Sanfuentes. 2016. Mega-trap-plots: a novel method of Sirex woodwasp management on Pinus radiata plantations in Chile. J. South Afr. For. Assoc. 78: 289–297. Google Scholar

29.

Rishbeth, J. 1963. Stump protection against Fomes annosus. III. Inoculation with Peniophora gigantean . Ann. Appl. Biol. 52: 63–77. Google Scholar

30.

Romana, G., L. L. Netta, F. Alexa, S. Michael, K. Rudolf, A. H. Benjamin, and S. S. Verena. 2015. Sm2, a paralog of the Trichoderma cerato-platan in elicitor Sm1, is also highly important for plant protection conferred by the fungal-root interaction of Trichoderma with maize. BMC Microbiol. 15: 2. Google Scholar

31.

Ryan, K., J. M. Moncalvo, P. D. Groot, and S. M. Smith. 2011. Interactions between the fungal symbiont of Sirex noctilio (Hymenoptera: Siricidae) and two bark beetle-vectored fungi. Can. Entomol. 143: 224–235. Google Scholar

32.

Ryan, K., P. de Groot, and S. M. Smith. 2012. Evidence of interaction between Sirex noctilio and other species inhabiting the bole of Pinus. Agric. For. Entomol. 14: 187–195. Google Scholar

33.

Sankar, N. R., M. N. Devamma, and D. Giridhar. 2012. First report of Alternaria alternata causing leaf spot on Rumex vesicarius in India. Austr. Plant Dis. Notes. 7: 17–18. Google Scholar

34.

Saucedo-García, A., A. L. Anaya, F. J. Espinosa-García, and M. C. González. 2014. Diversity and communities of foliar endophytic fungi from different agroecosystems of Coffea arabica L. in two regions of Veracruz, Mexico. PLoS One. 9: e98454. Google Scholar

35.

Schubert, M., S. Fink, and F. W. M. R. Schwarze. 2008. Evaluation of Trichoderma spp. as a biocontrol agent against wood decay fungi in urban trees. Biol. Control. 45: 111–123. Google Scholar

36.

Scott, J. J., D. C. Oh, M. C. Yuceer, K. D. Klepzig, J. Clardy, and C. R. Currie. 2008. Bacterial protection of beetle-fungus mutualism. Science. 322: 63. Google Scholar

37.

Slippers, B., B. P. Hurley, and M. J. Wingfield. 2015. Sirex woodwasp: a model for evolving management paradigms of invasive forest pests. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 60: 601–619. Google Scholar

38.

Spradberry, J. P., and A. A. Kirk. 1978. Aspects of the ecology of Siricid woodwasps (Hymenoptera: Siricidae) in Europe, North Africa and Turkey with special reference to the biological control of Sirex noctilio F. in Australia. Bull. Ent. Res. 68: 341–359. Google Scholar

39.

Stanosz, G. R., D. R. Smith, and M. A. Guthmiller. 1997. Persistence of Sphaeropsis sapinea on or in asymptomatic shoots of red and Jack pines. Mycologia. 89: 525–530. Google Scholar

40.

Sun, X., J. Tao, L. Ren, J. Shi, and Y. Luo. 2016. Identification of Sirex noctilio (Hymenoptera: Siricidae) Using a species-specific cytochrome C oxidase subunit I PCR assay. J. Econ. Entomol. 109: 1424–1430. Google Scholar

41.

Taylor, K. L. 1976. The introduction and establishment of insect parasitoids for the control of Sirex noctilio in Australia. Entomophaga. 21: 429–440. Google Scholar

42.

Thompson, B. M., R. J. Grebenok, S. T. Behmer, and D. S. Gruner. 2013. Microbial symbionts shape the sterol profile of the xylem-feeding woodwasp, Sirex noctilio. J. Chem. Ecol. 39: 129–139. Google Scholar

43.

Thompson, B. M., J. Bodaer, C. Mcewen, and D. S. Gruner. 2014. Adaptations for symbiont- mediated external digestion in Sirex noctilio (Hymenoptera: Siricidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 107: 453–460. Google Scholar

44.

Treena, B., D. W. Brenda, J. W. Michael. 2001. Comparison of genotypic diversity in native and introduced populations of Sphaeropsis sapinea isolated from Pinus radiata. Mycol. Res. 105: 1331–1339. Google Scholar

45.

Vega, F. E., M. S. Goettel, M. Blackwell, D. Chandler, M. A. Jackson, S. Keller, M. Koike, N. K. Maniania, A. Monzon, and B. H. Ownley. 2009. Fungal entomopathogens: new insights on their ecology. Fungal Ecol. 2: 149–159. Google Scholar

46.

Wahl, A. 2017. The effect of Sirex spp. woodwasps and their fungal associates on Alabama forest health: competitiveness of Amylostereum spp. fungi against Leptographium spp. fungi. Thesis. Auburn University, Auburn, AL. Google Scholar

47.

Wang, Y., and L. D. Guo. 2007. A comparative study of endophytic fungi in needles, bark, and xylem of Pinus tabulaeformis. Can J Bot. 85: 911–917. Google Scholar

48.

Wang, B., C. Salcedo, M. Lu, and J. Sun. 2012. Mutual interactions between an invasive bark beetle and its associated fungi. Bull. Entomol. Res. 102: 71–77. Google Scholar

49.

Wang, L. X., L. L. Ren, J. Shi, X. B. Liu, and Q. L. You. 2016. The mycobiota of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica trunk invaded by Sirex noctilio. Mycosystema. 36: 444–453. Google Scholar

50.

Wang, L. X., L. L. Ren, X. B. Liu, J. Shi, J. Z. Wang, and Y. Q. Luo. 2019. Effects of endophytic fungi in Mongolian pine on the selection behavior of woodwasp (Sirex noctilio) and the growth of its fungal symbiont. Pest Manag. Sci. 75: 492–505. Google Scholar

51.

Wu, H., H. Y. Yang, X. L. You, and Y. H. Li. 2013. Diversity of endophytic fungi from roots of Panax ginseng and their saponin yield capacities. Springerplus. 2: 107. Google Scholar

52.

Yousuf, F., G. M. Gurr, A. J. Carnegie, R. A. Bedding, R. Bashford, C. W. Gitau, and H. I. Nicol. 2014a. The bark beetle, Ips grandicollis, disrupts biological control of the woodwasp, Sirex noctilio, via fungal symbiont interactions. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 88: 38–47. Google Scholar

53.

Yousuf, F., A. Carnegie, R. Bashford, R. Bedding, H. I. Nicol, and G. M. Gurr. 2014b. Bark beetle (Ips grandicollis) disruption of woodwasp (Sirex noctilio) biocontrol: direct and indirect mechanisms. For. Ecol. Manag. 323: 98–104. Google Scholar

54.

Yuan, M., Y. Huang, Z. Jia, W. Ge, L. Zhang, Q. Zhao, S. Song, and Y. Huang. 2019. Whole RNA-sequencing and gene expression analysis of Trichoderma harzianum Tr-92 under chlamydospore-producing condition. Genes Genomics. 41: 689–699. Google Scholar
© Crown copyright 2019. This article contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0 (http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/).
Lixiang Wang, Chunchun Li, Juan Shi, Chengcheng Li, Jiale Li, Lili Ren, and Youqing Luo "Incidental Fungi in Host Trees Disrupt the Development of Sirex noctilio (Hymenoptera: Siricidae) Symbiotic Fungus and Larvae," Journal of Economic Entomology 113(2), 832-838, (3 December 2019). https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toz314
Received: 14 February 2019; Accepted: 5 November 2019; Published: 3 December 2019
KEYWORDS
Amylostereum areolatum
incidental fungi
moisture content
mortality
Sirex noctilio larvae
Back to Top