Translator Disclaimer
25 March 2022 Sampling Bias in Ethnobotanical Studies on Medicinal Plants Conducted in Local Markets
Jonathan Garcia Silva, Roberta de Almeida Caetano, Rafael Ricardo Vasconcelos da Silva, Patrícia Muniz de Medeiros
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Studies have identified the strong presence of sampling bias in ethnobiological research, which may seriously compromise study results. However, these studies were made in the context of Brazilian studies and global sampling evaluations are still needed. The present study adopted a global scale and was based on ethnobotanical surveys of medicinal plants in open fairs and markets. We aimed to assess sample quality and to identify the factors that interfere with it. Among the factors we investigated were how the (a) year of publication, (b) CiteScore, (c) presence of a clear research question, (d) presentation of hypotheses, and (e) the use of ethnobotanical indices influences the presence of sampling bias. The main source of bias verified in the studies was the absence of information about the sample and the population. None of the variables tested interfered with the level of bias of the studies. Efforts are needed to correct quantitative studies regarding sampling procedures, and the peer-review exercise in scientific journals should be attentive to sampling bias.

Jonathan Garcia Silva, Roberta de Almeida Caetano, Rafael Ricardo Vasconcelos da Silva, and Patrícia Muniz de Medeiros "Sampling Bias in Ethnobotanical Studies on Medicinal Plants Conducted in Local Markets," Journal of Ethnobiology 42(1), 20-30, (25 March 2022). https://doi.org/10.2993/0278-0771-42.1.20
Published: 25 March 2022
JOURNAL ARTICLE
11 PAGES


Share
SHARE
KEYWORDS
ethnobiology
local markets
open-air markets
STUDY DESIGN
systematic review
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top