Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
17 March 2025 Feline ocular and respiratory infections: a retrospective analysis of clinical cases submitted to Georgia Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratories (2012–2022)
David Neely, Yung-Yi C Mosley, Shauna Morris, Rebecca P Wilkes, Eman Anis, Hemant K Naikare, Susan Sanchez
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Objectives The objective of this study was to retrospectively assess the pathogens associated with feline ocular and respiratory diseases in routine diagnostic samples submitted to Georgia Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratories. Furthermore, pathogens detected by the respiratory PCR panel in the upper vs lower respiratory tract were compared (specimen separation at pharynx).

Methods Test records from feline ocular and respiratory PCR panels were collected from 2012 to 2022. While the ocular panel targets feline herpesvirus-1 (FHV), feline calicivirus (FCV) and Chlamydia felis, the respiratory panel covers FHV, FCV, C felis, Mycoplasma species, Bordetella bronchiseptica and influenza A virus.

Results In total, 120 and 453 submissions were made for the ocular and respiratory panels, with positivity rates of 49.2% (59/120) and 69.3% (314/453), respectively. Based on the available signalment, cats aged younger than 3 years made up 59.3% (32/54) and 47.3% (130/275) of positive cases, respectively. The top two findings by ocular and respiratory panels were single detection of FCV (28.8%, 17/59), FHV (25.4%, 15/59) and Mycoplasma species (36.9%, 116/314), co-detection of FCV + Mycoplasma species (20.4%, 64/314), respectively. The most common detection from samples of upper vs lower respiratory tract was Mycoplasma species (39.6%, 97/245) and FCV + Mycoplasma species (25%, 10/40).

Relevance and novel information FCV and FHV were the most frequent detections by the ocular panel, with Mycoplasma species and FCV + Mycoplasma species being the most frequent detections by the respiratory panel. Incorporating FCV and FHV in the vaccination regimen could help reduce the cases of feline ocular and respiratory diseases, especially for cats aged younger than 3 years. Veterinarians should consider Mycoplasma species when dealing with feline respiratory infections.

Introduction

Respiratory illness is a common reason for cats to visit a veterinary clinic1 and euthanasia in some shelters.2 Infectious agents are often the cause of feline respiratory diseases. Two viruses, feline calicivirus (FCV) and feline herpesvirus-1 (FHV), both cause coughing, sneezing and ocular/nasal discharge, but FCV can also cause gingivitis/stomatitis or oral ulcers.35 Bacterial organisms such as Chlamydia felis, Bordetella bronchiseptica and Mycoplasma species can cause ocular/nasal discharge, sneezing and conjunctivitis.3,610 While C felis is more likely to cause ocular signs than respiratory illness,6 B bronchiseptica causes bronchopneumonia and cough, although cough is less common in cats than dogs.3,9,10 A highly pathogenic influenza A virus such as H5N1 can induce high fever, ataxia, circling and high mortality,11 and a low pathogenic influenza virus originating from humans, dogs or birds causes cough, sneezing and ocular/nasal discharge with more serious signs often attributed to secondary bacterial infections.12 Further testing is often required to differentiate which pathogen is present in feline ocular and respiratory infections. Diagnosis and treatment are often presumed, as additional tests can be costly and time-consuming.

PCR testing has largely replaced bacterial culture and virus isolation due to higher sensitivity and quicker turnaround times.13 Georgia Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratories (GVDLs) provide two options for PCR panels: the ocular panel targeting FHV, FCV and C felis, and respiratory panel detecting FHV, FCV, C felis, Mycoplasma species, B bronchiseptica and influenza A virus. This study aimed to summarize the findings of the ocular and respiratory panels from clinical cases submitted to GVDLs, including infectious agents detected in the upper and lower respiratory tracts.

Materials and methods

Source of samples

The 2012–2022 ocular and respiratory PCR data were retrieved from VetView, the GVDLs’ (Athens and Tifton) Laboratory Information Management System. Specimens such as conjunctival/nasal/pharyngeal swabs, transtracheal wash, bronchoalveolar lavage and nasal/lung tissue were submitted from veterinarians, the veterinary teaching hospital of University of Georgia or in-house pathology/necropsy services. Submission sheets were sent with samples containing signalment, specimen type with physical location and the requested test, either ocular or respiratory PCR panel. Information about history, treatment and housing situation is often left blank on submission sheets.

Real-time PCRs

The real-time PCR methods have been previously described for the targets in the ocular and respiratory panels including FHV,14 FCV,15,16 C felis14/Chlamydia species17 and Mycoplasma species,18 B bronchiseptica19 and influenza A virus.20 Primer and probe sequences are listed in Table 1. Ct values lower than 35 or 40 are defined as positive detection. All PCR methods were conducted with proper controls to the standards of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians.

Table 1

Primer/probe used in the ocular and respiratory panels at Georgia Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratories

10.1177_20551169241306645-table1.tif

Data analysis

Excel spreadsheets (Microsoft) were used to analyze pathogen detections and locations in each age group (defined according to the American Association of Feline Practitioners and American Animal Hospital Association charts, with ages rounded to the nearest group) (Table 2). Specimens taken from below the pharynx are defined as lower respiratory samples, such as transtracheal wash and lung tissue. Pathogen detection between age groups was compared by Fisher’s exact test and correlation matrix by Spearman’s correlation in Prism, version 10 (GraphPad Software).

Table 2

Age groups and the detection numbers by ocular and respiratory panels

10.1177_20551169241306645-table2.tif

Results

Between 2012 and 2022, 120 submissions were received for ocular panel. Ocular sites such as conjunctival/corneal swab and ocular fluid comprised 56.7% (68/120) of the specimens and 17.5% (21/120) were from mixed locations including an ocular site (eg, nasal/conjunctival swab). The remaining 31 specimens were taken from upper respiratory areas such as nasal/oral or undefined sites.

The most common detection was FCV (28.8% [17/59]), followed by FHV (25.4% [15/59]) and C felis (20.3% [12/59]). Fifteen cases (25.4%) had more than one pathogen detected, including FCV + FHV (10.2% [6/59]), FCV + C felis (6.8% [4/59]), FHV + C felis (5.1% [3/59]) and FCV + FHV + C felis (3.4% [2/59]) (Figure 1). Pathogens were analyzed to examine if certain agents tended to be detected together. There was no significant correlation between the pathogens (P >0.05).

Figure 1

Number of detections by feline ocular PCR panel at Georgia Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratories from 2012 to 2022. Panel targets include feline herpesvirus-1 (FHV), feline calicivirus (FCV) and Chlamydia felis/Chlamydia species In total, 59 cases had at least one organism detected from 120 submissions (49.2% positivity rate)

10.1177_20551169241306645-fig1.tif

Cats aged younger than 3 years made up 59.3% (32/54) of the cases (Table 2). While 47.1% (8/17) of FCV detections were from non-ocular sites (such as nasal/oral/lung), most single detections of C felis (91.7%, 11/12) and FHV (80.0%, 12/15) were from ocular specimens.

Between 2012 and 2022, 453 submissions were received for respiratory panel. Overall, the panel showed 30.7% (139/453), 14.6% (66/453), 2.4% (11/453), 51.9% (235/453), 3.5% (16/453) and 0.2% (1/453) positivity rate for FCV, FHV, C felis, Mycoplasma species, B bronchiseptica and influenza A virus, respectively. Most specimens (82.3%, 373/453) were taken from respiratory sites such as nasal/oral/tracheal swab, nasal flush/tissue and lung tissue, 3.09% (14/453) of samples were from ocular sites and 5.96% (27/453) were from mixed locations including an ocular site (eg, oral/nasal/conjunctival swab). The remaining 8.61% (39/453) specimens were taken from other or undefined sites.

The most common single detection was Mycoplasma species (36.9%, 116/314), followed by FCV (13.7%, 43/314) and FHV (7.6%, 24/314) (Figure 2). Multipathogens comprised 127 cases (40.4%), including FCV + Mycoplasma species (20.4%, 64/314), FHV + Mycoplasma species (5.41% 17/314) and FHV + FCV + Mycoplasma species (4.78%, 15/314) (Figure 2). No cases tested positive for more than four pathogens (Figure 2). A significant correlation was identified between co-detection of FCV + Mycoplasma species (P = 0.01), C felis + Mycoplasma species (P = 0.044) and Bordetella species + Mycoplasma species (P = 0.004) (Figure 3).

Figure 2

Number of detections by feline respiratory PCR panel at Georgia Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratories from 2012 to 2022. Panel targets include feline herpesvirus-1 (FHV), feline calicivirus (FCV), Chlamydia felis, Bordetella bronchiseptica, Mycoplasma species and influenza A virus. In total, 314 cases had at least one organism detected from 453 submissions (69.3% positivity rate)

10.1177_20551169241306645-fig2.tif

Figure 3

Pathogen detection correlation matrix by feline respiratory PCR panel. Number 0 or 1 was assigned for negative or positive results, respectively, for conducting the correlation coefficient analysis. Spearman’s r is shown for each pair of pathogens. Four pathogens showed significant correlation of co-detection including FCV + Mycoplasma species (P = 0.001), Chlamydia felis + Mycoplasma species (P = 0.044) and Bordetella species + Mycoplasma species (P = 0.004). FCV = feline calicivirus; FHV = feline herpesvirus-1

10.1177_20551169241306645-fig3.tif

Age distributions showed that most infections were among junior animals, followed by kittens and prime (25.5%, 21.8% and 18.9%, respectively) (Table 2). The most common pathogens found in cats aged 10 years and under were Mycoplasma species, FCV + Mycoplasma species and FCV (Figure 4). For cats younger than 7 years old (kitten + junior + prime), FHV detections were significantly less than those of other age groups (P = 0.0099), while FCV + Mycoplasma was significantly less in senior and geriatric cats than in younger age groups (P = 0.042) (Figure 4).

Figure 4

Pathogen detection percentage by feline respiratory PCR panel. Of the 314 positive cases, 275 had age provided. The kitten, junior, prime and mature age groups all had feline calicivirus (FCV), Mycoplasma species and FCV + Mycoplasma species as the most common pathogens. The senior age group had Mycoplasma species, feline herpesvirus-1 (FHV) and FCV as the most common pathogens. The geriatric age group had Mycoplasma species and a tie between FHV + Mycoplasma species and FCV.

*Coinfection of FCV + Mycoplasma species is significantly less common in senior and geriatric cats than in younger cats (P = 0.042);

**single FHV infection is significantly less common in cats younger than 7 years (kitten + junior + prime) than in cats older than 7 years (mature + senior + geriatric) (P = 0.0099)

10.1177_20551169241306645-fig4.tif

While most detections were from respiratory specimens (81.8%, 257/314), the majority of the triple detection of C felis + FCV + Mycoplasma species (80%, 4/5) were from mixed sites including an ocular site (eg, oral/nasal/conjunctival swab). The only positive specimen identified for influenza A virus was lung tissue. Based on the recorded physical locations, specimens from the respiratory panel were further divided into upper vs lower respiratory tract. Positivity rates were slightly higher in upper respiratory samples (Table 3). While single pathogen cases were higher in upper respiratory samples, multipathogen detections were higher in lower respiratory samples (Table 3). The top three detections were the same for upper vs lower respiratory tract but in different order: Mycoplasma species (39.6%, 97/245), FCV + Mycoplasma species (19.2%, 47/245) and FCV (12.7%, 31/245) vs FCV + Mycoplasma species (25%, 10/40) and a tie between Mycoplasma species and FCV (22.5%, 9/40), respectively (Figures 5 and 6). While no case had four or more pathogens in the upper respiratory tract, one case of FHV + FCV + Bordetella species + Mycoplasma species was identified in the lower respiratory tract (lung tissue) (Figures 5 and 6).

Table 3

Detection numbers of specimens taken from upper vs lower respiratory tract* by the respiratory panel

10.1177_20551169241306645-table3.tif

Figure 5

Number of detections from the upper respiratory tract by feline respiratory PCR panel. Among specimens taken from upper respiratory tract, 69.8% (245/351) tested positive with the three most common pathogens being Mycoplasma species, FCV + Mycoplasma species and FCV. FCV = feline calicivirus; FHV = feline herpesvirus-1

10.1177_20551169241306645-fig5.tif

Figure 6

Number of detections from the lower respiratory tract by feline respiratory PCR panel. Among specimens taken from lower respiratory tract, 65.6% (40/61) tested positive with the three most common pathogens being FCV + Mycoplasma, Mycoplasma species and FCV. FCV = feline calicivirus; FHV = feline herpesvirus-1

10.1177_20551169241306645-fig6.tif

Discussion

Prevalence studies for feline ocular and upper respiratory infections have been reported from the UK,21 Germany,22 Spain23 and Australia,24 as well as for shelter animals in Korea,25 Canada26 and the USA.13,27,28 However, retrospective data have not been reported from a diagnostic laboratory in the USA. To give regional veterinarians a better idea of the pathogens detected in feline ocular and respiratory infections, we summarized the 2012–2022 results from GVDLs’ PCR panels.

This study included samples submitted by veterinarians and was not exclusively obtained from shelter populations. Our findings are consistent with those investigating general populations, with FCV and Mycoplasma species being the two most detected pathogens.23,24 On the other hand, studies focusing on shelter cats mostly found FHV or Mycoplasma species to be the most detected pathogen.13,2527

Not all submissions for the ocular panel comprise only ocular specimens. While some veterinarians may have chosen the ocular panel over the respiratory panel for economic reasons, others may have taken swabs from multiple respiratory sites to increase the chance of pathogen detection. After all, respiratory tract infections often involve signs in both ocular and respiratory systems.310,12

Interestingly, Mycoplasma species comprise most detections of both upper and lower respiratory submissions. Although, Mycoplasma species are considered to be a commensal of the upper airway and conjunctiva of cats, a weak but significant association was found between Mycoplasma species and upper respiratory tract disease in a meta-analysis study.29 While it is not conclusive that Mycoplasma species are a primary pathogen of the upper respiratory tract in the current study, the fact that it is the only detected agent in most upper respiratory disease cases does provide some evidence to support this argument. Yet, the detection of a pathogen does not mean it is solely responsible for causing the disease, as other pathogens could have been missed if early in the course or other etiologies such as asthma or neoplasia could also be involved predisposing to mycoplasmal infection.8 Mycoplasma species detection was found to be significantly correlated between FCV, C felis and B bronchiseptica (Figure 3), suggesting the role of secondary infection in those cases.

FCV was detected more often than FHV in the current study; however, FHV infection leads to latent infection after recovery, and thus, the prevalence of FHV could be underestimated. While 23.9% (75/314) cases submitted for the respiratory panel had viral-only detections, about 76.1% (239/314) were bacterial-only or had bacterial components, suggesting that empirical treatment with antibiotics may have merit. B bronchiseptica and influenza A virus were detected in very few cases, suggesting they are not main contributors to feline respiratory cases submitted to our laboratories in Georgia.

Kittens and junior cats (<3 years old) seemed to make up most cases received in both diagnostic laboratories and had the most mixed infections. Although low in number, mature and senior cats had a larger percentage of FHV infections (Figure 4), possibly due to latent FHV recrudescing in older animals. Mycoplasma species had the most frequent detection in all age groups, except in kittens where it was the second most common.

Due to the limitation of the data source, we did not have complete histories for most submitted cases. Lack of information on treatment, housing conditions and clinical signs hampered our ability to draw stronger conclusions from our data. Nevertheless, it is fair to assume that animals submitted for the ocular and respiratory PCR panels were showing signs consistent with infection of either ocular, respiratory or both. Given this, it is reasonable to conclude that positive detections by the PCR panels are likely to be at least contributing to the disease state. Another limitation of the current study is that PCR results cannot rule out pathogens not included in the panel such as Staphylococcus and Streptococcus species.

Conclusions

FCV and FHV were the most frequent detections by the ocular panel, with Mycoplasma species and FCV being the most frequent detections by the respiratory PCR panel. As many cases involved FCV and/or FHV, incorporating FCV and FHV in vaccination regimens could help reduce the number of cases and/or lessen the clinical signs. Mycoplasma species were the major pathogen detected in both upper and lower respiratory tracts. Despite its controversial role as a primary pathogen, there is value in considering antibiotic treatment for Mycoplasma species in feline respiratory cases.

Acknowledgements

We thank the staff of the Athens and Tifton Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory Molecular Sections for their hard work and dedication.

Author note This paper was presented as a poster at the 2023 American Association for Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians Annual Meeting.

Conflict of interest The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethical approval The work described in this manuscript involved the use of non-experimental (owned or unowned) animals. Established internationally recognized high standards (‘best practice’) of veterinary clinical care for the individual patient were always followed and/or this work involved the use of cadavers. Ethical approval from a committee was therefore not specifically required for publication in JFMS Open Reports. Although not required, where ethical approval was still obtained, it is stated in the manuscript.

Informed consent Informed consent (verbal or written) was obtained from the owner or legal custodian of all animal(s) described in this work (experimental or non-experimental animals, including cadavers, tissues and samples) for all procedure(s) undertaken (prospective or retrospective studies). No animals or people are identifiable within this publication, and therefore, additional informed consent for publication was not required.

© The Author(s) 2025

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

References

1.

Lord LK , Reider L , Herron ME , et al. Health and behavior problems in dogs and cats one week and one month after adoption from animal shelters. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2008; 233: 1715–1722. Google Scholar

2.

Dinnage JD , Scarlett JM and Richards JR. Descriptive epidemiology of feline upper respiratory tract disease in an animal shelter. J Feline Med Surg 2009; 11: 816–825. Google Scholar

3.

Sykes JE. Pediatric feline upper respiratory disease. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2014; 44: 331–342. Google Scholar

4.

Radford AD , Addie D , Belák S , et al. Feline calicivirus infection. ABCD guidelines on prevention and management. J Feline Med Surg 2009; 11: 556–564. Google Scholar

5.

Binns SH , Dawson S , Speakman AJ , et al. A study of feline upper respiratory tract disease with reference to prevalence and risk factors for infection with feline calicivirus and feline herpesvirus. J Feline Med Surg 2000; 2: 123–133. Google Scholar

6.

Sykes JE. Feline chlamydiosis. Clin Tech Small Anim Pract 2005; 20: 129–134. Google Scholar

7.

Bannasch MJ and Foley JE. Epidemiologic evaluation of multiple respiratory pathogens in cats in animal shelters. J Feline Med Surg 2005; 7: 109–119. Google Scholar

8.

Lee-Fowler T. Feline respiratory disease: what is the role of Mycoplasma species? J Feline Med Surg 2014; 16: 563–571. Google Scholar

9.

Speakman AJ , Dawson S , Binns SH , et al. Bordetella bronchiseptica infection in the cat. J Small Anim Pract 1999; 40: 252–256. Google Scholar

10.

Binns SH , Dawson S , Speakman AJ , et al. Prevalence and risk factors for feline Bordetella bronchiseptica infection. Vet Rec 1999; 144: 575–580. Google Scholar

11.

Burrough ER , Magstadt DR , Petersen B , et al. Highly pathogenic avian influenza A (H5N1) clade 2.3.4.4b virus infection in domestic dairy cattle and cats, United States, 2024. Emerg Infect Dis 2024; 30: 1335–1343. Google Scholar

12.

Frymus T , Belák S , Egberink H , et al. Influenza virus infections in cats. Viruses 2021; 13: 1435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/v13081435Google Scholar

13.

Litster A , Wu CC and Leutenegger CM. Detection of feline upper respiratory tract disease pathogens using a commercially available real-time PCR test. Vet J 2015; 206: 149–153. Google Scholar

14.

Helps C , Reeves N , Egan K , et al. Detection of Chlamydophila felis and feline herpesvirus by multiplex real-time PCR analysis. J Clin Microbiol 2003; 41: 2734–2736. Google Scholar

15.

Meli ML , Berger A , Willi B , et al. Molecular detection of feline calicivirus in clinical samples: a study comparing its detection by RT-qPCR directly from swabs and after virus isolation. J Virol Methods 2018; 251: 54–60. Google Scholar

16.

Abd-Eldaim MM , Wilkes RP , Thomas KV , et al. Development and validation of a TaqMan real-time reverse transcription-PCR for rapid detection of feline calicivirus. Arch Virol 2009; 154: 555–560. Google Scholar

17.

Pantchev A , Sting R , Bauerfeind R , et al. Detection of all Chlamydophila and Chlamydia spp. of veterinary interest using species-specific real-time PCR assays. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 2010; 33: 473–484. Google Scholar

18.

Choppa PC , Vojdani A , Tagle C , et al. Multiplex PCR for the detection of Mycoplasma fermentans, M. hominis and M. Penetrans in cell cultures and blood samples of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Mol Cell Probes 1998; 12: 301–308. Google Scholar

19.

Hozbor D , Fouque F , Guiso N. Detection of Bordetella bronchiseptica by the polymerase chain reaction. Res Microbiol 1999; 150: 333–341. Google Scholar

20.

Spackman E , Senne DA , Myers TJ , et al. Development of a real-time reverse transcriptase PCR assay for type A influenza virus and the avian H5 and H7 hemagglutinin subtypes. J Clin Microbiol 2002; 40: 3256–3260. Google Scholar

21.

Chan I , Dowsey A , Lait P , et al. Prevalence and risk factors for common respiratory pathogens within a cohort of pet cats in the UK. J Small Anim Pract 2023; 64: 552–560. Google Scholar

22.

Hartmann AD , Hawley J , Werckenthin C , et al. Detection of bacterial and viral organisms from the conjunctiva of cats with conjunctivitis and upper respiratory tract disease. J Feline Med Surg 2010; 12: 775–782. Google Scholar

23.

Fernandez M , Manzanilla EG , Lloret A , et al. Prevalence of feline herpesvirus-1, feline calicivirus, Chlamydophila felis and Mycoplasma felis DNA and associated risk factors in cats in Spain with upper respiratory tract disease, conjunctivitis and/or gingivostomatitis. J Feline Med Surg 2017; 19: 461–469. Google Scholar

24.

Nguyen D , Barrs VR , Kelman M , et al. Feline upper respiratory tract infection and disease in Australia. J Feline Med Surg 2018; 21: 973–978. Google Scholar

25.

Kang BT and Park HM. Prevalence of feline herpesvirus 1, feline calicivirus and Chlamydophila felis in clinically normal cats at a Korean animal shelter. J Vet Sci 2008; 9: 207–209. Google Scholar

26.

Walter J , Foley P , Yason C , et al. Prevalence of feline herpesvirus-1, feline calicivirus, Chlamydia felis, and Bordetella bronchiseptica in a population of shelter cats on Prince Edward Island. Can J Vet Res 2020; 84: 181–188. Google Scholar

27.

Zirofsky D , Rekers W , Powell C , et al. Feline herpesvirus 1 and Mycoplasma spp. conventional PCR assay results from conjunctival samples from cats in shelters with suspected acute ocular infections. Top Companion Anim Med 2018; 33: 45–48. Google Scholar

28.

McManus CM , Levy JK , Andersen LA , et al. Prevalence of upper respiratory pathogens in four management models for unowned cats in the southeast United States. Vet J 2014; 201: 196–201. Google Scholar

29.

Le Boedec K . A systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between Mycoplasma spp and upper and lower respiratory tract disease in cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2017; 250: 397–407. Google Scholar
David Neely, Yung-Yi C Mosley, Shauna Morris, Rebecca P Wilkes, Eman Anis, Hemant K Naikare, and Susan Sanchez "Feline ocular and respiratory infections: a retrospective analysis of clinical cases submitted to Georgia Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratories (2012–2022)," Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery Open Reports 11(1), (17 March 2025). https://doi.org/10.1177/20551169241306645
Accepted: 26 November 2024; Published: 17 March 2025
KEYWORDS
FCV
FHV
Georgia
Mycoplasma
ocular
PCR
respiratory
Back to Top