Translator Disclaimer
1 October 2010 Increased Fluctuating Asymmetry in a Naturally Occurring Hybrid Zone between the Stick Insects Bacillus Rossius Rossius and Bacillus Rossius Redtenbacheri
Author Affiliations +

The impact of interracial hybridization on fluctuating asymmetry (FA) and phenotypic variability (σ2p) in a presumed natural hybrid zone between the stick insects, Bacillus rossius rossius Rossi and Bacillus rossius redtenbacheri Nasceti & Bullini (Phasmatodea: Bacillidea), found on the Italian island Sardinia was investigated. The lengths of three bilateral traits and three unilateral traits were measured, and each individual was genotyped by five microsatellite loci. The genotypic data clearly confirmed the existence of the hybrid zone on Sardinia. A significantly increased FA was found in the hybrids when compared to both parental subspecies, which this study attributes to genetic incompatibilities in the hybrids. The increase in FA was not correlated with any increase in σ2P in the hybrids, which indicates that in this case σ2p and FA originate from separate processes.


In nature, many stable natural hybrid zones exist in which hybrid populations have persisted for centuries (Bella et al. 2007; Szymura and Barton 1986). In many cases hybridization has been an important part of evolution that promotes incorporation of new genes from one population to another and in several cases has been shown to be a step in the process leading to speciation (Templeton 1981; Mantovani et al. 1996; Parris et al. 2001). The stability of hybrid zones is very often attributed to a balance between dispersal of parental individuals into the zone and selection against hybrids (Barton and Hewitt 1985; Szymura and Barton 1986; Ostberg et al. 2004).

Hybridization may affect fitness of hybrid individuals, and several investigations have shown that the fitness of hybrids is often decreased dramatically. Furthermore, hybridization may affect the developmental instability (DI) of hybrids, which refers to an individual's inability to produce a specific phenotype under a given set of environmental conditions. A number of studies have shown DI to be increased in hybrids when compared to their parentals (e.g. Andersen et al. 2002, 2006; Garnier et al. 2006). One commonly used measure of DI is fluctuating asymmetry (FA), or the difference in value between paired bilateral traits, which is known to be elevated due to environmental stresses and genetic factors such as hybridization (Andersen et al. 2002, 2006, 2008; Kristensen et al. 2003, 2004; Røgilds et al. 2005; Pertoldi et al. 2006a; Petavy et al. 2006; Lens et al. 2000; Soderman et al. 2007; Krag et al. 2009). The reason for the increased FA in intraspecific hybrids has been attributed to a breakdown in co-adapted gene complexes (Andersen et al. 2002), whereas in interspecific hybrids increased FA has more often been attributed to genetic incompatibilities causing meiotic irregularities or physiological and developmental abnormalities (Andersen et al. 2006; Burke and Arnold 2001; Pialek et al. 2001; Rego et al. 2006; Kurbalija et al. 2010).

Under stressful conditions several investigations have found an increase in DI estimated as FA and the phenotypic variance (σ2p) (Imasheva and Bubliy 2003; Willmore et al. 2005, 2006; Pertoldi and Bach 2007). Even though this is a common observation, the underlying mechanisms that control σ2p and FA are still not clear (Pertoldi et al. 2001, 2003, 2006b). Waddington (1957) originally stated that σ2p and FA are controlled by separate processes, namely canalization and developmental stability, respectively. Canalization describes the buffering mechanisms that ensure similar development under different environmental influences, which, according to Waddington (1957), should be separated from the process responsible for the within-individual variability (DI) resulting in FA.

The question of whether canalization (σ2p) and DI (FA) are affected by different mechanisms has been doubted by several authors (Dworkin 2005; Willmore et al. 2006), and supported by others (Hoffmann and Woods 2001; Rego et al. 2006). However, no clear conclusion has been reached and the underlying genetic mechanisms of σ2p and FA have yet to be evaluated. In hybrids, the new genetic background often results in significantly increased FA, and therefore hybrid populations could be suitable for investigating the extent of congruence between DI and canalization.

Hybridization is a common phenomenon within the genus Bacillus Latreille, (Phasmatodea: Bacillidea) and has given rise to several hybrid parthenogenetic species (see Scali et al. 2003). Bacillus rossius spreads over most of the western Mediterranean basin with two Italian sub-species, B. r. rossius Rossi and B. r. redtenbacheri Nasceti & Bullini. B. r. rossius is found on the Thyrrenian and Ligurian coasts of the Italian mainland and on the North-Western part of Sardinia. B. r. redtenbacheri is found along the Adriatic coasts, on Sicily, and on the South-eastern part of Sardinia (Sarrabus area). A previous study of walking sticks, also called stick insects, on Sardinia revealed the presence of a hybrid zone between B. r. rossius and B. r. redtenbacheri based on allozyme analysis in the central part of the island (Mantovani and Scali 1991). But since that collection, the habitat of the stick insects has changed dramatically on Sardinia. Particularly along the coast, roads have been enlarged to improve the infrastructure for the increased number of tourists coming to the island, and the bush vegetation and distribution have become considerably fragmented. These changes have resulted in very heavy destruction of the habitats of the stick insects, because one of the preferred habitats of the stick insects is along roadsides where the usual feeding bush bramble (Rubus fruticosus) is very frequent. However, these changes have only affected the coastal areas of the island where the parental races live and not the centre where the hybrid zone presumably is found and can be considered undisturbed. In this study, stick insects from the presumed hybrid zone were used in order to investigate:

  • 1) If the hybrid zone between B. r. rossius and B. r. redtenbacheri on Sardinia really exists based on recently developed microsatellite markers (Andersen et al. 2005).

  • 2) The impact of hybridization on FA and σ2P in the naturally occurring hybrid zone between B. r. rossius and B. r. redtenbacheri.

  • 3) The existence of congruence between σ2p and FA.

Materials and Methods

Collecting time and sites

Stick insects were collected from two nearby localities in the centre of Sardinia (Paulilatino and Escolca). These are the areas in which hybrid individuals between B. r. rossius and B. r. redtenbacheri have previously been found (Mantovani and Scali 1991). Due to habitat destruction, a sufficient number of amphigonic individuals of the parental B. r. rossius and B. r. redtenbacheri species on Sardinia that are found on the north eastern coast (Isola Rossa) and on the south-eastern coast (Villasimius), respectively, were not able to be obtained. In order to compare the hybrids with their parental races, amphigonic B. r. redtenbacheri were collected on the Adriatic coast of Italy at Torino di Sangro Marina, Abruzzo, and amphigonic B. r. rossius were collected on the Thyrrhenian coast at two nearby localities, Capalbio and Montiano, Toscana, which are about the same latitude as that of the B. r. redtenbacheri population and that of the hybrids. These populations of parental races were chosen because their habitats appeared very well preserved (see Pertoldi et al. 2001b) and because other samples taken at similar latitudes clearly clustered with the corresponding Sardinian B. r. redtenbacheri and B. r. rossius in the allozyme data sets well apart from the hybrids (Mantovani and Scab 1991).

Morphological measurements

The adult stick insects were preserved in alcohol and measured for three bilateral traits (the antenna, the labial palpus, and the maxillary palpus) and three unilateral traits (mesonotum, metanotum, and abdomen). The bilateral traits were measured with the use of a binocular microscope with a digital filar eyepiece (Los Angeles Scientific Instrument Company, Inc., The unilateral traits were measured with a digital calliper to the nearest 0.1mm.

To estimate the measurement error for the bilateral traits, a sub-sample of 30 individuals, picked at random, were measured twice. The second set of measurements was made without reference to the first set. A two-way ANOVA was conducted to test for significance of FA relative to measurement error (the difference between the two independent measures of FA) (following Palmer and Strobeck 1986). To quantify possible errors associated with measuring body size (the sum of the mesonotum, metanotum, and abdomen), 20 individuals were taken at random, and each individual body size was measured ten times. The within individual coefficient of variation for each mean was taken as an estimate of the measurement error, adding Haldane's (1955) correction for small sample size.

The interaction mean square (MS) containing information about FA was tested against error MS (reflecting measurement error) showing that FA was significantly larger than measurement error for all three traits (p < 0.001). The measurement error for body size was low with a mean value of 0.12%.

Genetic analysis

DNA was extracted from all 46 individuals collected at the presumed Sardinia hybrid zone, from 28 B. r. rossius individuals, and from 29 B. r. redtenbacheri individuals by the use of the CTAB method modified from Doyle and Doyle (1987). The stick insects were genotyped by five microsatellite loci (locus B154, B67, B101, B152, B198) (Andersen et al. 2005), and the fragment analyses of the PCR products were performed on a Beckman CEQ8000 sequencer using 5′labelled (Sigma-Proligo, forward primers.

Statistical analysis

In all of the following statistical analyses, males and females were analyzed separately, except in the genetic analysis.

The hybrids were collected from two nearby localities on Sardinia, and B. r. rossius individuals were collected from two nearby localities on the mainland. Before making any pooling of hybrid or B. r. rossius individuals from the two localities into one sample, the samples were analyzed for significant differences between localities with the respective tests described below. In no case were significant differences found between the collection sites within the two groups, and therefore the samples were pooled as one in all cases. Due to the large number of tests conducted, a sequential Bonferroni test (Rice 1989) was applied.

Comparison of trait size among populations

Tests for significant changes in mean body size and mean length of the right side of the labial and maxillary palpus were performed by a one-way ANOVA and a Kruskal-Wallis test (Zar 1984). Multiple comparisons were done with Tukey's HSD test. A permutation t-test was performed among males and females in order to test for differences in the mean length of the right antenna between B. r. rossius and B. r. redtenbacheri. The hybrids were not included due to the high number of phenodeviants (see below).

FA measurements

FA characterized by a normal distribution of right-left side differences with a mean of zero (Palmer and Strobeck 1986). To test whether the data obtained display the statistical properties of FA, a one sample t-test was performed for directional asymmetry, which occurs if the data set shows a significant deviation from zero of the mean value of right minus left trait size (r-1). Test for normality was performed with a Shapiro-Wilk test (Zar 1984).

FA of the three bilateral traits was calculated as (r-1) values, and for each population and sex, FA1 was estimated as the mean value of the absolute FA and FA4 as the variance of (r-1) (following Palmer and Strobeck 1986). Test for correlation between trait size and its absolute FA value was done by linear regression analysis and Spearman rank correlation test (Zar 1984), and correlations of absolute FA of different traits within individuals was tested by linear regression analysis.

Comparison of FA and σ2p among populations

Due to the low sample size of the hybrids, pair-wise comparisons of FA1 were performed by a permutation t-test (1000 permutations). The permutation t-test is more accurate when dealing with non-normal distributions and small samples. Tests for differences in FA4 among populations were performed by an F-test.

The σ2P was estimated for the variance of body size (sum of the mesonotum, metanotum, and abdomen) and the variance of the right side of the three bilateral traits. Tests for differences in σ2P among populations were done by an F-test. Due to the small sample sizes, and since the F-test is rather sensitive to the assumption of normality, a Levene's (1960) test was also performed. This was done by transforming the data of body size or length of the right side of the bilateral traits into absolute deviations from the mean, and then testing for significant difference between the mean deviations by a permutation t-test (1000 permutations).

Genetic analysis

The presence of null alleles was tested by the use of the software MicroChecker 2.2.3 (Oosterhout 2003). Observed (HO) and expected (HE) heterozygosities were calculated and tests for deviation from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) and linkage disequilibrium (LD) were performed by the use of FSTAT (Goudet 2002). Genetic differences between the populations were tested for by estimating the pair-wise FST value (Weir and Cockerham 1984) with Fstat software (Goudet 2002). A Bayesian analysis was performed with STRUCTURE 2.0 software to infer the hybrid status of the Sardinian population (Pritchard et al. 2000) with a burn-in length of 100,000 and 1,000,000 Markov-chain Monte Carlo replicates for k = 3, where k represents the number of populations with distinctive allele frequencies. An admixture model incorporating predefined population information for the B. r. rossius and B. r. redtenbacheri populations was used, but no prior information was given for the hybrids. Incorporation of the population information for the pure species could be the most informative when dealing with hybrid zones (Prichard et al. 2000). Five independent simulations were compared to examine the consistency of estimated parameter values.

Table 1.

One-way ANOVA (Levens's test) for comparing the mean body size and mean length of the right maxillary palpus and labial palpus in the parental B. rossius rossius and B. rossius redtenbacheri populations and their hybrids. F-test for homogeneity of variances, Kruskal-Wallis one-way non-parametric analysis and Tukey's pairwise comparisons.



Comparison of trait size among populations

For all traits and in both sexes, B. r. redtenbacheri showed the highest mean trait size (Table 1). Male hybrids always exhibited trait sizes intermediate between the parental populations (Table 1). Hybrid females also exhibited a mean body size that was intermediate between the parentals, but mean sizes of the labial and the maxillary palpus were equal to one of the parental populations (B. r. rossius and B. r. redtenbacheri, respectively) (Table 1).

Significantly higher mean body size was found in female B. r. redtenbacheri when compared to B. r. rossius. No significant differences in body size were observed between the male subspecies, but B. r. redtenbacheri exhibited a significantly higher mean maxillary palpus size than B. r. rossius, and for the labial palpus a significant higher mean size when compared to both B. r. rossius and the hybrids.

For males, the permutation t-test revealed a significantly higher mean length of the antenna in B. r. redtenbacheri than in B. r. rossius (t45,38 = 5.39, p < 0.001). This test did not consider the hybrids because of the high number of phenodeviants for this trait (see below). No significant difference in mean size of the antenna was observed between the females.

FA measurements

Deviations from a mean of zero for the FA distributions were found for the antenna of the B. r. redtenbacheri females (t = 2.83, p < 0.01, df = 34), B. r. rossius females (t = 2.98, p < 0.01, df = 47), and B. r. rossius males (t = 2.90, p < 0.01, df = 38). Significant deviations from normality were found due to leptokurtic distributions of FA, but only in three cases: labial palpus and maxillary palpus in B. r. redtenbacheri males and antenna in hybrid males.

In no case was a significant correlation between absolute FA and body size found. However, correlations between absolute FA of different traits within individuals were found in several cases, but only in the parental subspecies. Significant correlation between absolute antenna FA and maxillary palpus FA was found in B. r. rossius females (n = 48, r = 0.53, p < 0.0001), B. r. redtenbacheri females (n = 35, r = 0.68, p < 0.0001), and B. r. redtenbacheri males (n = 45, r = 0.97, p <0.0001). Significant correlation between FA of the antenna and FA of the labial palpus was only found in B. r. redtenbacheri males (n = 45, r = 0.94, p < 0.0001). Significant correlation between absolute FA of the maxillary palpus and the labial palpus were found in B. r. redtenbacheri (n = 45, r = 0.96, p < 0.0001) and in B. r. rossius males (n = 39, r = 0.42, p < 0.01).

Table 2.

t-test for pair-wise comparisons of FA1 among the parental populations B. rossius rossius and B. rossius redtenbacheri and their hybrids, and F-test for pairwise comparisons of FA4 among the parental B. rossius rossius and B. rossius redetnbacheri and their hybrids.


Comparison of FA and σ2p among populations

A very high number of phenodeviants for the antenna were found among the hybrid individuals of both sexes. A phenodeviant was defined in this study as an individual showing strong asymmetry exceeding three standard deviations of the signed values of FA due to a reduction in segments of one of the two antennae (45.65% phenodeviants among the hybrids versus 3.75% phenodeviants among the parentals), which caused the high values of FA for the hybrids. For both sexes, the permutation t-test found significantly higher levels of FA1 for all traits in the hybrids when compared to the B. r. rossius and B. r. redtenbacheri populations (Table 2). FA4 was significantly higher for all traits in the hybrid females when compared to the females from both parental races (Table 1). No significant differences in FA4 among B. r. redtenbacheri and B. r. rossius females were ever found (Table 1). A different pattern, however, was observed for the males where significant higher FA4 was found in both the hybrids and in B. r. redtenbacheri when compared to B. r. rossius males for all three traits (Table 2). Only for the antenna did the hybrid males show higher levels of FA4 when compared to both the parental subspecies due to the high number of phenodeviants among the hybrids (Table 1).

The F-test and Levene's (1960) pair-wise comparisons of σ2p gave the same results (only results of Levene's test are shown in the text). For body size, a significant higher σ2p in B. r. redtenbacheri was found when compared with B. r. rossius for both females (t35,48= 2.98, p < 0.01) and males (t39,46= 3.62, p < 0.01). No differences in σ2p were found for the bilateral traits, except from higher σ2p of the antenna of the hybrids when compared to both parental subspecies due to the high number of phenodeviants.

Table 3.

Number of observed alleles per locus (NA), observed frequency of heterozygotes (Ho) and expected frequency of heterozygotes (HE) for a population.


Genetic analysis

No evidence for the presence of null alleles was found in the B. r. rossius individuals; however, in the hybrids evidence for the presence of null alleles at locus B101 (with a frequency of 0.18) and in the B. r. redtenbacheri individuals at locus B67 (with a frequency of 0.21) was found. In the B. r. rossius individuals, three loci were monomorphic, while Ho for the other two loci was 0.2 and 0.34 (Table 3). Two loci were monomorphic in the B. r. redtenbacheri individuals, and in the other loci HO varied from 0.08 to 0.66 (Table 3). In the hybrids, no loci were monomophic and the observed heterozygosity varied from 0.11 to 0.57 (Table 3). No deviation from HWE was found in any of the populations, and no LD was found between any loci in the populations.

The estimator of population subdivision FST (Weir and Cockerham 1984) significantly differed from zero in all cases. Highest FST was found between the B. r. rossius and B. r. redtenbacheri populations with a value of 0.55, whereas the divergence between hybrids and the B. r. rossius or B. r. redtenbacheri populations was 0.11 and 0.33, respectively.

The Bayesian assignment test resulted in high posterior probabilities (0.99) for the assignment of individuals from the parental subspecies to either B. r. rossius or B. r. redtenbacheri populations. For the hybrids, the situation was quite different with posterior probabilities of assignments of 0.32, 0.34, and 0.34 to the B. r. rossius, B. r. redtenbacheri, and the Sardinian population, respectively (Figure 1).


The collection on Sardinia clearly showed that the amphigonic populations of the two parental species have declined considerably in the coastal areas since the last collection by Mantovani and Scab (1991). The population present in the centre of the island still consisted of hybrids between B. r. rossius and B. r. redtenbacheri. This was confirmed both by our morphologic and genetic analysis. Morphologically, the trait sizes of the hybrids were found to be intermediate when compared to the parental subspecies (Table 1).

Genetically, the hybrids diverged significantly from both parental populations (estimated as FST values), and the Bayesian assignment test found no evidence of purely parental individuals in the hybrid zone (Figure 1). The hybrid status of the population found in the centre of Sardinia was further demonstrated by the assignment of the individuals with a probability of 33% to each of the parental populations and 33% probability to the Sardinian population (Figure 1). The microsatellite loci used in this investigation are not very polymorphic and would perform weakly in intraspecies population analyses, but due to the presence of subspecies specific alleles they were extremely useful for detecting hybrids.

Figure 1.

Bar plotting of the results obtained from the STRUCTURE analysis using K= 3. Each individual is represented as a vertical line partitioned into K shaded segments that represent an individual's estimated membership fraction in each of the K inferred clusters. High quality figures are available online.


The second aim of this investigation was to evaluate DI of the hybrids when compared to their parental subspecies. DI estimated as FA1 was significantly increased in the hybrid males and females when compared to both the parental subspecies (Table 2). The increased FA1 in the hybrids was attributed to genetic incompatibilities having a strong negative effect on development.

In females, FA4 exhibited the same pattern as FA1. However, a significantly higher FA4 was found in both the hybrids and B. rossius redtenbacehri males when compared to the B. r. rossius males. The increased FA4 in the hybrid males likely is caused by genetic incompatibilities, though the reasons for the higher FA4 in B. r. redtenbacheri males when compared to B. r. rossius males remain unclear. It is unlikely that environmental factors are responsible for the increased FA4 in B. r. redtenbacheri males since males and females were collected in the same environment, and no increase in FA4 in B. r. redtenbacheri females was observed when compared to B. r. rossius females. Some unknown genetic or genotype environment interactions could cause the increased FA4 in B. r. redtenbacheri males.

Among the hybrid individuals a very high number of phenodeviants for the antenna trait were found. It has previously been suggested that the genes controlling the antenna are located on the sex chromosomes (Andersen et al. 2005; Pertoldi et al. 2001b), and this investigation further supports this view. The genes located on the sex chromosomes in stick insect males are subject to strong selection because males are hemizygous for X-linked genes. For this reason, in hybrids, traits controlled by genes located on the X-chromosomes may be more affected by genetic incompatibilities than autosomal traits.

In this investigation the increase of FA in the hybrids was not correlated with an increase in (σ2p, even though σ2p often has been found to increase due to stress, both environmental and genetic (Imasheva and Bubliy 2003; Willmore et al. 2005, 2006). There is good reason to believe that in the B. rossius race hybrids, genetic variability (σ2g) has increased because of their higher allele diversity when compared to the parental subspecies. This was also in concordance with a previous study of allozymes in the hybrids (Mantovani and Scab 1991). Nonetheless, this was not paralleled by an increased σ2p in the hybrids. Therefore the environmental variability (σ2e) could be increased in the parental subspecies, counteracting the increased σ2g in the hybrids, and resulting in the same level of σ2P. A cooccurring increase of σ2P in the parental populations seems unlikely, however, since it should have occurred in all collection sites which are apparently undisturbed and located far apart on the Tyrrhenian and Adriatic coasts.

If σ2P was increased in the parental populations, suggesting that the hybrids have developed in a more stable environment, it would actually reinforce the hypothesis that the increased FA observed in the hybrids was actually due to the new genetic structure caused by hybridization. More likely the lack of a concordant increase of both σ2p and FA in the hybrids could be explained by the hypothesis suggested by Waddington (1957), that separate mechanisms are responsible for the impact of stress (in this case “genetic stress” caused by hybridization) on σ2p and FA: σ2p would be the result of canalization processes, whereas FA would be the result of DI.

Following the Bateson-Dobzhansky-Muller (BDM) model, genetic incompatibilities between species arise when, in one species, a new allele at a given locus becomes fixed, and in the other species a second new allele at another locus becomes fixed (Orr 1995; Gavrilets 1999). Lynch and Force (2000) have made a further elaboration on this model that suggests that duplicated genes, which are present in high numbers in almost all eukaryotic organisms, are the substrate for the origin of genomic incompatibilities in isolated populations. Genetic incompatibilities arise when one population loses function from one gene copy while the second loses function from a second gene copy at a different chromosomal location, which leads to chromosomal re-pattering such that gametes produced by the hybrid individuals can be completely lacking functional genes for a duplicate pair (see Lynch and Force 2000 for details). Duplicate gene mutations leading to genetic incompatibilities can accumulate in an effectively neutral manner (Lynch and Force 2000). This is opposite to co-adapted gene complexes that are believed to arise due to selection acting to preserve non-additive, epistatic interactions among loci. This creates interacting complexes of genes adapted to the local environmental conditions (Parsons 1990).

If σ2p is mostly controlled by canalization, hybridization between individuals with different co-adapted gene complexes would lead to disruption of epistatic genetic interactions. Then σ2p would increase due to the lack of epistatic modifiers that suppress the additive genetic variance and the environmental variance under genetic and environmental canalization, respectively (Wagner et al. 1997). However, if the genetic differences between species are mainly due to genetic incompatibilities that have arisen in a neutral/passive manner, as suggested by Lynch and Force (2000), FA could increase due to divergence between species in regulatory pathways, resulting in high levels of asymmetry which do not need to increase (σ2p as well.

If the observed increase in FA is due to increased DI, this depends on the definition of DI. Rego et al. (2006) define developmental stability (which is the opposite of DI) to be the buffering mechanism against random noise in the cellular processes that are involved in the development of morphological structures. If this definition holds, the observed increased FA in interspecific hybrids is rarely the result of randomness; it is rather the result of well-defined genetic incompatibilities and therefore does not reflect DI. If DI, on the other hand is defined as the inability of an organism to buffer its developmental processes against environmental and genetic disturbances to ensure bilateral symmetry, the observed increase in FA in this study is the result of increased DI in the hybrids. No matter whether the increased FA in this study reflects increased DI or not, it can be concluded that the mechanisms responsible for the increased FA in the hybrids do not seem to affect the buffering mechanism responsible for σ2p.

This study clearly shows that the hybrids are more asymmetric than their parents. The study found no reason to assume that the increase in FA is due to environmental factors, and therefore the increased FA can be attributed to genetic incompatibilities in the hybrids. The reason for no concordant increase in σ2p in the hybrids has been debated. However, due to the incomplete knowledge of the genetic mechanisms behind FA and σ2p, a lot of work must be done in order to clarify how the two processes responsible for intra- and inter-individual variation are controlled and interact. Hopefully, these results will promote additional investigations on the topic.


This work was supported by the Danish Natural Sciences Research Council [grant number: #21-01-0526, #21-03-0125 and 95095995] and the Villum Kann Rasmussen Foundation [VKR-05-024] to Ditte Holm Andersen.



developmental instability;


fluctuating asymmetry; σ2p, phenotypic variability


  1. DH Andersen , C Pertoldi , V Scali , V. Loeschcke 2002. Intraspecific hybridisation, developmental stability and fitness in Drosophila mercatorum. Evolutionary Ecology Research 4: 603–621. Google Scholar

  2. DH Andersen , C Pertoldi , V Loeschcke , V. Sacli 2005. Characterization of microsatellite loci in the stick insects Bacillus rossius rossius, Bacillus rossius redtenbacheri and Bacillus whitei (Insecta: Phasmatodea). Molecular Ecology Notes 5: 576–578. Google Scholar

  3. DH Andersen , C Pertoldi , V Loeschcke , V. Scab 2006. Developmental instability, hybridisation and heterozygosity in stick insects of the genus Bacillus (Insecta; Phasmatodea) with different modes of reproduction. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 87: 249–259. Google Scholar

  4. DH Andersen , C Pertoldi , V Loeschcke , S Cavicchi , V. Scab 2008. The impact of genetic parental distance on developmental stability and fitness in Drosophila buzzatii. Genetica 134: 223–233. Google Scholar

  5. NH Barton , GM. Hewitt 1985. Analysis of hybrid zones. Annual Review of Ecological Systems 16: 113–132. Google Scholar

  6. JL Bella , L Serrano , J Orellana , PL. Mason 2007. The origin of the Chorthippus parallelus hybrid zone: Chromosomal evidence of multiple refugia for Iberian populations. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20: 568–576. Google Scholar

  7. JM Burke , ML. Arnold 2001. Genetics and the fitness of hybrids. Annual Review of Genetics 35: 31–52. Google Scholar

  8. FF Doyle , FL. Doyle 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small amounts of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11–15. Google Scholar

  9. I. Dworkin 2005. A study of canalization and developmental stability in the sternoplural bristle system of Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 59: 1500–1509. Google Scholar

  10. S Garnier , N Gidaszewski , M Chariot , JY Rasplus , P. Alibert 2006. Hybridization, developmental stability, and functionality of morphological traits in the ground beetle Carabus solieri (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Biological Journal Linnean Society 89: 151– 158. Google Scholar

  11. S. Gavrilets 1999. A dynamical theory of speciation on holey adaptive landscapes. American Naturalist 154: 1–22. Google Scholar

  12. J. Goudet 2002. FSTAT. A program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version Available from: Google Scholar

  13. JBS. Haldane 1955. The measurement of variation. Evolution 9: 484. Google Scholar

  14. AA Hoffmann , RE. Woods 2001. Trait variability and stress: Canalization, developmental stability and the need for a broad approach. Ecology Letters 4: 97–101. Google Scholar

  15. AG Imasheva , OA. Bubliy 2003. Quantitative variation of four morphological traits in Drosophila melanogaster under larval crowding. Hereditas 138: 193–199. Google Scholar

  16. K Krag , H Thomsen , S Faurby , A Kjærsgaard , M Tejedo , V Loeschcke , C. Pertoldi 2009. Consequences of outbreeding on phenotypic plasticity in Drosophila mercatorum wings. Evolutionary Ecology 23: 403–415. Google Scholar

  17. TN Kristensen , C Pertoldi , HD Andersen , V. Loeschcke 2003. The use of fluctuating asymmetry and phenotypic variability as indicators of developmental instability, testing of a new method employing clonal organisms and high temperature stress. Evolutionary Ecology Research 5: 53–68. Google Scholar

  18. TN Kristensen , C Pertoldi , LD Pedersen , DH Andersen , LA Bach , V. Loeschcke 2004 The increase of fluctuating asymmetry in a monoclonal strain of collembolans after chemical exposure —discussing a new method for estimating the environmental variance. Ecological Indicators 4: 73–81. Google Scholar

  19. Z Kurbalija , M Stamenkovic-Radak , C Pertoldi , M. Marko Andjelkovic 2010. Outbreeding causes developmental instability in rosophila subobscura. Evolutionary Ecology, 24: 839–864. Google Scholar

  20. L Lens , Dongen S Van , P Galbusera , T Schenck , E Matthysen , T. Van De Casteele 2000. Developmental instability and inbreeding in natural bird populations exposed to different levels of habitat disturbance. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 13: 889–896. Google Scholar

  21. H. Levene 1960. Essays in honor of Harold Hotelling. In: I Olkin , editor. Contributions to Probability and Statistics , pp. 278–292. Stanford University Press. Google Scholar

  22. M Lynch , AG. Force 2000. The origin of interspecific genomic incompatibility via genome duplication. American Naturalist 156: 590–605. Google Scholar

  23. B Mantovani , V. Scali 1991. Allozymic characterization of Sardinian Bacillus rossius (Rossi) and B. atticus Brunner (Insecta Phasmatodea). Genetica 83: 275–287. Google Scholar

  24. B Mantovani , F Tinti , M Barilani , V. Scab 1996. Current reproductive isolation between ancestors of natural hybrids in Bacillus stick insects (Insecta: Phasmatodea). Heredity 77: 261–268. Google Scholar

  25. C Oosterhout , B Hutchinson , D Wills , P. Shipley 2003. MicroChecker version 2.2.3. Available from: Google Scholar

  26. HA. Orr 1995. The population genetics of speciation: The evolution of hybrid incompatibilities. Genetics 139: 1805–1813. Google Scholar

  27. CO Ostberg , SL Slatton , RJ. Rodriguez 2004. Spatial partitioning and asymmetric hybridization among sympatric coastal steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss irideus), coastal cutthroat trout (O. clarki clarki) and interspecific hybrids. Molecular Ecology 13: 2773–2788. Google Scholar

  28. AR Palmer , C. Strobeck 1986. Fluctuating asymmetry: Measurement, analysis and patters. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 17: 391–421. Google Scholar

  29. MJ. Parris 2001. Hybridisation in Leopard frogs (Rana pipiens complex): Variation in interspecific hybrid larval fitness components along a natural contact zone. Evolutionary Ecology Research 1: 23–38. Google Scholar

  30. PA. Parsons 1990. Fluctuating asymmetry: An epigenic measure of stress. Biological Reviews 65: 131–145. Google Scholar

  31. C Pertoldi , DH Andersen , T Nygard , V. Loeschcke 2003. Consequences of a reduction in genetic variance on developmental instability estimators. Evolutionary Ecology Research 5: 893–902. Google Scholar

  32. C Pertoldi , L. Bach 2007. Evolutionary aspects of climate induced changes and the need for multidisciplinarity. Journal of Thermal Biology 32: 118–124. Google Scholar

  33. C Pertoldi , JS Givskov , JR David , V. Loeschcke 2006a. Lerner's theory on the genetic relationship between heterozygosity, genomic coadaptation and developmental instability. Evolutionary Ecology Research 8: 1487–1498. Google Scholar

  34. C Pertoldi , TN Kristensen , DH Andersen , V Loeschcke , 2006b. Review: Developmental instability as an estimator of genetic stress. Heredity 96: 122–127. Google Scholar

  35. C Pertoldi , T Nygard , V. Loeschcke 2001a. A new method for estimating environmental variability for parthenogenetic organisms, and the use of fluctuating asymmetry as an indicator of developmental stability. Journal of Theoretical Biology 4: 407–410. Google Scholar

  36. C Pertoldi , V Scab , V. Loeschcke 2001b. Developmental instability in sexual reproducing and parthenogenetic populations of Bacillus rossius rossius and Bacillus rossius redtenbacheri. Evolutionary Ecology Research? 3: 449–463. Google Scholar

  37. G Petavy , B Moreteau , V Debat , C Pertoldi , RJ. David 2006. Sternopleural bristle number under daily thermal stresses in Drosophila melanogaster:Phenotypic and genetic variability and developmental instability. Evolutionary Ecology Research 8: 149–167. Google Scholar

  38. J Pialek , HC Hauffe , KM Rodriguez-Clark , JB. Searle 2001. Raciation and speciation in house mice from the Alps: The role of chromosomes. Molecular Ecology 10: 613– 625. Google Scholar

  39. JK Pritchard , M Stephens , P. Donnelly 2000. Inference of population structure from multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945– 959. Google Scholar

  40. C Rego , M Matos , M. Santos 2006. Symmetry breaking in interspecific Drosophila hybrids is not due to developmental noise. Evolution 60: 746–761. Google Scholar

  41. WR. Rice 1989. Analysing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43: 223–225. Google Scholar

  42. A Røgilds , DH Andersen , C Pertoldi , K Dimitrov , V. Loeschcke 2005. Maternal and grandmaternal age effects on developmental instability and wing size in parthenogenetic Drosophila mercatorum. Biogerontology 6: 1– 9. Google Scholar

  43. V Scab , M Passamonti , O Marescalchi , B Mantovani , 2003. Linkage between sexual and asexual lineages: Genome evolution in Bacillus stick insects. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 79: 137–150. Google Scholar

  44. F Soderman , Dongen S Van , S Pakkasmaa , J. Merila 2007. Environmental stress increases skeletal fluctuating asymmetry in the moor frog, Rana arvalis. Oecologia 151: 593–604. Google Scholar

  45. JM Szymura , NH. Barton 1986. Genetic analysis of a hybrid zone between the fire- bellied toads, Bombina bombina and B. Variegata, near Cracow in southern Poland. Evolution 40: 114–1159. Google Scholar

  46. AR. Templeton 1981. Mechanisms of speciation — a population genetic approach. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 12: 23–48. Google Scholar

  47. CH. Waddington 1957. The Strategy of the Genes . George Allen and Unwin. Google Scholar

  48. GP Wagner , G Booth , H. Bagheri-Chaichian 1997. A population genetic theory of canalization. Evolution 51: 329–347. Google Scholar

  49. BS Weir , CC. Cockerham 1984. Estimating Fstatistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38: 1358–1370. Google Scholar

  50. KE Willmore , CP Klingenberg , B. Hallgrimsson 2005. The relationship between fluctuating asymmetry and environmental variance in rhesus macaque skulls. Evolution 59: 898–909. Google Scholar

  51. KE Willmore , ML Zelditch , N Young , A AhSeng , S Lozanoff , B. Hallgrimsson 2006. Canalization and developmental stability in the brachyrrhine mouse. Journal of Anatomy 208: 361–372. Google Scholar

  52. JH. Zar 1984. Biostatistical Analysis . Prentice Hall. Google Scholar

This is an open access paper. We use the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license that permits unrestricted use, provided that the paper is properly attributed.
Ditte Demontis, Cino Pertoldi, Marco Passamonti, and Valerio Scali "Increased Fluctuating Asymmetry in a Naturally Occurring Hybrid Zone between the Stick Insects Bacillus Rossius Rossius and Bacillus Rossius Redtenbacheri," Journal of Insect Science 10(147), (1 October 2010).
Received: 10 February 2009; Accepted: 1 March 2010; Published: 1 October 2010

Back to Top