Translator Disclaimer
1 June 2013 Nestling Sex Ratio in a Critically Endangered Dimorphic Raptor, Ridgway's Hawk (Buteo ridgwayi)
Lance G. Woolaver
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Variation in nestling sex ratio is an important concept in population ecology, and has particular implications for the conservation status of small populations. Research on species exhibiting Reversed Sexual Size Dimorphism (RSSD), in which females are larger than males, have shown that significant biases in nestling sex ratios can result from demographic and environmental conditions experienced by parents during the breeding episode. We collected morphometric measurements from the critically endangered Ridgway's Hawk (Buteo ridgwayi) over a 4-yr period, verifying that the species exhibits RSSD. Females weighed 25% more than males and were significantly larger for 7 of 12 body measurements. Nestling sex-ratios were determined by PCR amplification of the CHD1 gene. The results revealed a weak but consistent trend toward female-biased broods for the small remaining population. Parents may potentially be producing more females, the more costly sex, due to an ample food supply and adaptive allocation of parental care. A female-bias sex ratio may also signal management concern for the species if it is caused by inbreeding; however, currently the bias is not significant enough to warrant immediate intense nest intervention or nest management for this critically endangered species.

La variación en la relación de sexos en pichones es un concepto importante en la ecología de poblaciones y tiene implicancias particulares para el estado de conservación de poblaciones pequeñas. Investigaciones en especies que presentan Dimorfismo Sexual Invertido (DSI), en el cual las hembras son más grandes que los machos, han demostrado que los sesgos significativos en la relación de sexos de los pichones pueden ser el resultado de condiciones demográficas y ambientales experimentadas por los padres durante el episodio de cría. Colectamos medidas morfométricas de individuos de Buteo ridgwayi, una especie en peligro crítico, durante un periodo de cuatro años, verificando que la especie presenta DSI. Las hembras pesaron 25% más que los machos y fueron significativamente más grandes en 7 de 12 medidas corporales. La relación de sexos de los pichones se determinó por amplificación de RCP del gen CHD1. Los resultados revelaron una tendencia débil pero consistente hacia nidadas sesgadas hacia las hembras para la pequeña población restante. Los padres pueden estar produciendo más hembras, que representa el sexo más costoso, debido a un amplio suministro de alimento y a una distribución flexible del cuidado parental. La relación de sexos sesgada hacia las hembras puede ser una señal de preocupación en el manejo de la especie, si es que ésta es causada por endogamia; sin embargo, actualmente el sesgo no es lo suficientemente significativo como para requerir intervención de nidos de forma inmediata o manejo de nidos para esta especie en peligro crítico.

Variation in offspring sex ratio is an important concept in conservation and population ecology (Clutton-Brock 1986, Frankham and Wilcken 2006) and is an essential parameter for viability analyses of small populations (Ferrer et al. 2004, 2009, Rossmanith et al. 2006, 2007, Frankham 2010). This is particularly true for small isolated populations (Bro et al. 2000) where distortion of nestling sex ratios can accelerate extinction (Gabriel and Burger 1992, Brook et al. 2000, Ferrer et al. 2009). For some avian taxa which have recently gone extinct, including the Heath Hen (Tympanuchus cupido cupido) and Dusky Seaside Sparrow (Ammodramus maritimus nigrescens), the last breeding pairs produced single-sex broods after years of population decline and inbreeding (Avise and Nelson 1989, Simberloff 1988).

In birds, studies have provided evidence that parents can adjust the offspring sex ratio either at the egg-laying stage (primary sex ratio adjustment) or during the period of provisioning for the nestlings (secondary sex ratio adjustment; Ellegren and Sheldon 1997, Kilner 1998, Trnka et al. 2012). Patterns of sex ratio adjustment among raptors have been of particular interest because unlike other groups of birds, most diurnal raptors exhibit reversed sexual size dimorphism (RSSD) with females being larger than males (Snyder and Wiley 1976, Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001). One consequence of this size difference may be that rearing daughters is more costly, because daughters require more parental investment in the form of food energy, compared to sons (Laaksonen et al. 2004). Research in species with RSSD has shown that significant biases in the sex ratio of nestlings are linked to demographic factors and environmental conditions experienced by the parents during breeding (Torres and Drummond 1997, Korpimäki et al. 2000, Arroyo 2002, Byholm et al. 2002, Hipkiss et al. 2002, Villegas et al. 2004, Magrath et al. 2007, Erikstad et al. 2009). Fisher's theory (1930) predicts that under poor conditions parents should favor the least costly sex to minimize parental investment. Evidence to support this hypothesis is mixed, with some research documenting male-biased broods when food is limited and/or weather conditions are adverse (Wiebe and Bortolotti 1992, Korpimäki et al. 2000, Ingraldi 2005) and others showing no sex-ratio distortions during adverse conditions (Genovart et al. 2008). In addition, demographic factors such as age of parents, laying date, and clutch size have been reported to influence brood sex ratios (Leroux and Bretagnolle 1996, Risch and Brinkhof 2002, Griggio et al. 2002, Ferrer et al. 2009, Wu et al. 2010), with more males being produced to younger parents and from larger and earlier clutches.

Sex ratio may also be affected by genetic factors. Inbreeding has been reported to distort offspring sex ratios by reducing the proportion of the homogametic sex (Worthington-Wilmer et al. 1993, Eldridge et al. 1999). A meta-analysis of published literature compiled by Wilcken (2001) documented a slight overall directional distortion in sex ratios due to inbreeding.

Ridgway's Hawk (Buteo ridgwayi) is a forest raptor endemic to Hispaniola in the Caribbean. The species was locally common in areas of Haiti and the Dominican Republic at the turn of the century (Cory 1885, Wetmore and Lincoln 1934), but is now listed as Critically Endangered (IUCN 2010). The current global population size is estimated at 91–109 pairs, limited to an area of 1600 km2 of karst rainforest in Los Haitises National Park on the northeast coast of the Dominican Republic (IUCN 2010, Woolaver 2011). Deforestation due to slash–and-burn agriculture and human persecution of hawks have been major factors in the species' decline (Woolaver 2011). Nearly all of the original forest cover has disappeared from Haiti, and 90% of the Dominican Republic's original forests have been destroyed by human activity (Harcourt and Sayer 1996). We here report the degree of reversed sexual size dimorphism in Ridgway's Hawk from morphometric measurements of live birds, and examine the secondary (nestling) sex ratio to determine if sex ratio distortion could be placing this small population at increased risk of extinction.

Methods

Study Area

The island of Hispaniola (19°0′N, 71°0′W) is located in the center of the Greater Antilles archipelago and consists of the nations of Haiti and the Dominican Republic. Less than 1.5% of Haiti's original forest is left, most of which is in the inaccessible uplands of the island and is highly degraded (Rimmer et al. 2005). The Dominican Republic has not fared much better, with only 10% of its original forest cover remaining intact but under threat of further loss from unregulated logging, slash-and-burn agriculture, and charcoal production (Latta et al. 2006). We conducted our study in Los Haitises National Park (19°N, 70°W) which ranges from 0–380 masl in elevation and is located on the northeast coast of the Dominican Republic (Fig. 1). It is a platform karst (eroded limestone) formation, with dense clusters of steep conical hills, or mogotes, of nearly uniform height (200–300 m) separated by sinkhole or doline valleys. The Los Haitises region consists of thousands of such mogotes within an area of ca. 1600 km2.

Figure 1

Maps showing relative location of Hispaniola in the Caribbean; and the island of Hispaniola with nations of Haiti and Dominican Republic and their respective capital cities: Port-au-Prince (1) and Santo Domingo (2). The study area of Los Haitises National Park boundaries are delineated in black (3).

i0892-1016-47-2-117-f01.tif

Nest Monitoring

Breeding pairs of B. ridgwayi were studied over four breeding seasons (January to July 2005–2008). Early-season searches for breeding pairs were made from vantage points on hillsides overlooking valleys to identify nest locations. Once a nest was found, it was visited every 1–3 d (for easily accessible nests), or every 1–2 wk (for sites that were more difficult to access) to determine which pairs laid a clutch (termed the “active” nests), and how many reared young to fledging. Nest observations were carried out with binoculars and a spotting scope from a covered vantage point (25–75 m away). Due to the topography of the nesting valleys, it was generally possible to find a vantage point on a hillside above the level of the nest that allowed complete viewing into the nest cup. A nest was classified as successful if at least one young fledged. A nest was considered failed if it had been active but subsequently did not produce at least one fledgling. Indications of nest failure were the absence of both adults or the absence of one adult and inattendance of the remaining adult during a 2- to 4-hr observation on successive visits, or the death or disappearance of all eggs or nestlings. Nest contents were identified (when possible) by viewing through a spotting scope or climbing to nests. Nests were accessed during the late-nestling stage due to the risks of handling young nestlings and of abandonment/failure during the incubation period. Therefore it was only possible to assess secondary (nestling) sex ratio.

Capture, Measurement, and Banding

Nestlings were accessed at the nest when 15–40 d old. Nestlings were placed in cotton bags and lowered to the ground below the nest, where they were measured and banded, and a blood sample was collected for molecular sexing. Handling time of nestlings did not exceed 20 min per individual. Adults were captured using bal chatri noose traps baited with white domestic mice (Mus musculus; Thorstrom 1996). Adults were not trapped during incubation.

Morphometric measurements were carried out prior to banding or collection of blood for DNA. Twelve measurements were taken on all birds: body mass (g), unflattened wing chord, tail length (measured on the central rectrice), skull length (posterior of cranium to base of mandible), skull width, culmen (anterior edge of cere to tip of bill), bill depth and width (both measured at anterior edge of cere), tarsus length (length between the intertarsal joint and the last leg scale before the toes emerge), tarsus width (width of widest part of tarsus, measured at mid-point between the foot and tibio-tarsal articulation), middle toe length, middle toe talon. All characteristics were measured to the nearest 0.1 mm using callipers, except for wing chord and tail length which were measured to the nearest 1.0 mm using a meterstick, and mass which was measured to the nearest 0.1 gram. Ridgway's Hawks were banded with individually numbered, colored, anodized Acraft© aluminium rivet bands. No more than one band was ever placed on a leg.

DNA Collection and Extraction

Approximately 0.2 ml of blood was drawn via capillary tube from a patagial vein puncture, half of which was stored in 1.6 ml of Queen's lysis buffer (Seutin et al. 1991). The other 0.1 ml of blood was stored in 1.8 ml of 95% ethanol. All samples were stored at ambient temperature until delivered to laboratory facilities where they were preserved at −20°C.

Total cell DNA was isolated by blood cell lysis, followed by DNA precipitation using ammonium acetate and isopropanol (L. de Sousa, B. Woolfenden, and S. Tarof unpubl. protocol for York University Molecular Ecology Lab). This involved the addition of 50 µl of blood/Queen's lysis buffer to 600 µl of cell lysis buffer and 5 µl of ice-cold Proteinase K (40 ng/µl). This solution was then incubated at 55–60°C for 5 hr and then at 37°C overnight. Ice-cold ammonium acetate (200 µl) was then added, mixed gently, and centrifuged to precipitate protein. The aqueous phase, including the dissolved genomic DNA, was removed and placed in a fresh tube. Ice-cold isopropanol (600 µl) was added and the solution inverted until DNA was visible as a white floating string or flake. This solution was then centrifuged to collect genomic DNA as a pellet at the bottom of the tube. The supernatant was removed and the DNA pellet washed with ice-cold 70% ethanol. This solution was then centrifuged again and the ethanol then removed. This ethanol wash was repeated a second time. The tube was then left open and inverted overnight to allow the DNA pellet to dry completely. The DNA pellet was then suspended in 100–200 µl of TE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA) at 37°C for 24 hr. DNA was stored at 4°C while in use, and at −20°C for longer-term storage.

DNA was visualized under ultraviolet radiation on a 1% agarose test gel, pre-stained with ethidium bromide. Samples were visualized next to a Mass-Ruler high range DNA ladder mix (Fermentas O'GeneRuler™). Samples were run along with positive (DNA sample of known size) and negative (distilled water) controls.

Sex Determination

Molecular sexing of the Ridgway's Hawk samples (adults and nestlings) was carried out by PCR amplification of the CHD1 gene. The methods of Fridolfsson and Ellegren (1999) with primers 2550F/2718R were modified as follows. DNA samples were removed from −20°C storage and incubated in a 37°C water bath for 30 min. Polymerase Chain Reactions (PCR) were run on all adult and nestling samples collected in 2005–2007. Genomic DNA was amplified in 10 µl reactions containing 3.7 µl of distilled water, 1.25 µl of PCR reaction buffer (10X TSG), 3.25 µl of 2.0 mM MgSO4, 0.25 µl of 10 mM dNTPs, 0.25 µl of fluorescently dyed 10 uM forward (2550F) and reverse (2718R) primers, 0.05 µl of Taq DNA polymerase (TSG), and 1 µl of DNA template (ca. 15 ng DNA in TE buffer). PCR reactions were carried out in an Eppendorf MasterCycler™ thermal cycler. An initial 2-min denaturing step at 94°C was followed by 30 cycles of 30 sec at 94°C, 30 sec at an annealing temperature of 50°C, and a 30-sec extension step at 72°C. The PCR reaction finished with a final 5-min extension step at 72°C, and samples were then held at 4°C until taken from the thermal cycler. Samples were run on a 2% agarose (1.0 g agarose powder to 50 mL of 1X TBE) gel post-stained with ethidium bromide (10 µl ETBR per gel). Gels were run at 70 V for 75 min in order to achieve sufficient band separation to discern males (one band) from females (two bands). Male Ridgway's Hawks showed a clear single band for the CHD1-Z gene at 600 bp, while females showed bands at the CHD1-Z gene (600 bp) and at the CHD1-W gene (350 bp). Sexes of the adult birds were known through both plumage differences observed during handling (sexes are distinguishable by plumage when in the hand; Wiley and Wiley 1981) and also further support from field observations of nesting behavior. Sex assignment using the CHD1 gene agreed with sex assignment by plumage and behavior for all 20 adult female and 15 adult male Ridgway's Hawks, so we were confident the molecular method worked successfully.

Data Analysis

Mann-Whitney U-tests were used to compare morphometric measurements between adult males and females. Binomial tests were used to test whether nestling sex ratios (number of males/number of females) deviated significantly from a 1∶1 ratio for each year 2005–2008, and for all years combined. Data were analysed using the SPSS statistical package (SPSS 2003). P values ≤0.05 indicated a significant result; P values >0.05 and <0.10 indicated a trend.

Results

Reversed Sexual Size Dimorphism

Adult female Ridgway's Hawks were significantly greater in size for 7 of the 12 morphometric variables measured (Table 1). Females were ca. 25% heavier than males on average. There was no overlap in mass, with all females weighing ≥352 g and all males weighing ≤323 g. Wing chord, tarsus width, and culmen were all highly significantly different, with very little overlap between females and males (Table 1). Skull width showed a trend toward differentiation between the sexes (P  =  0.07, Table 1). There was no significant difference in size between males and females for bill width, tarsus length, middle toe length, and middle toe talon (Table 1).

Table 1

Mean ± SD (range) for twelve measurements from 20 adult female and 15 adult male Ridgway's Hawks. All variables are reported in mm except for body mass (g).

i0892-1016-47-2-117-t01.tif

Nestling (Secondary) Sex Ratio

Sixty-three broods were sampled at the nestling stage: one brood contained three nestlings, 37 contained two nestlings, and 25 contained one nestling. Sex was determined for 103 nestlings (42 male, 61 female) between 2005 and 2008 (Table 2). Nestling sex ratios (M∶F) ranged from 1∶1.25 in 2005 to 1∶1.90 in 2007 (Table 2) and in each year were female-biased. None of the years exhibited statistically significant deviations from 1∶1 (Table 2), but statistical testing was limited due to the unavoidably small sample sizes inherent in dealing with critically endangered populations. However, an overall trend in favor of females was evident when all years were combined (Table 2).

Table 2

Observed annual nestling (secondary) sex ratios of Ridgway's Hawk from 2005–2008.

i0892-1016-47-2-117-t02.tif

The majority of broods with two or more nestlings contained mixed sexes (25/38, 65.7%; Fig. 2). For single-sex broods containing two or more nestlings, more than twice as many were all-female (9/13) compared to all-male (4/13) for all seasons combined (Fig. 2). In addition, there were almost twice as many nests with a single female nestling (16/25) compared to a single male nestling (9/25; Fig. 2). Of the 63 nests monitored, 13 showed a reduction in brood size compared to clutch size (Table 3). Six of these reductions were caused by a nestling succumbing to botfly (Philornis pici) parasitism, three were caused by one egg not hatching, and the remaining five causes were unknown but suspected to be related to predation and human persecution. During 1000+ hours of nest observation during the nestling stage, there were no incidents of direct aggression among nestlings (Woolaver 2011). Although this does not preclude nestling aggression from occurring within the species, it does suggest that aggressive bouts were relatively infrequent.

Figure 2

Number of Ridgway's Hawk broods per year with mixed-sex nestlings (striped bar), all female nestlings (white bar), and all male nestlings (black bar). (A) Broods with two or more nestlings and (B) Broods with only one nestling.

i0892-1016-47-2-117-f02.tif

Table 3

Clutch and brood sizes of 63 sampled nests monitored from 2005–2009.

i0892-1016-47-2-117-t03.tif

Discussion

Reversed Sexual Size Dimorphism

Measurements of live birds during the current study verified reversed sexual size dimorphism in Ridgway's Hawk, as initially reported from museum specimens by Wiley and Wiley (1981). Females were approximately 25% heavier than males on average, and had significantly larger skulls, wings, and tails. Sexual dimorphism is typical of the genus Buteo with many species showing varying levels of reversed sexual dimorphism (Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001). There also appears to be a trend for insular species to exhibit higher rates of dimorphism than mainland Buteos. Two island Buteos, the Galapagos Hawk (B. galapagoensis) and the Hawaiian Hawk (B. solitarius), exhibit the highest levels of reversed sexual dimorphism within the genus, with females being ≥30% larger in mass than males (Paton et al. 1994). In the Red-shouldered Hawk (B. lineatus), the closest taxonomic relative to Ridgway's Hawk (Amaral et al. 2009), females are up to 25% heavier than males (Dykstra et al. 2008, 2012).

There were no significant differences between male and female Ridgway's Hawks in tarsus length, middle toe length, middle toe talon, or bill width. Although males are approximately 25% lighter in mass than females, and smaller in other physical traits including skull, wing and tail length, they have similar-sized talons, tarsus length, and bill width. For raptors, these are morphological traits that are important for hunting. In terms of hunting capability, being smaller and lighter for easier maneuverability within forested areas, yet retaining ample-sized hunting morphology including long legs and talons for catching prey, and a wide bill for retaining, killing, or ripping larger prey may make males more efficient hunters.

Nestling Sex Ratios

Our results suggested there was a weak but consistent sex-ratio bias toward females. In terms of sex allocation, this trend toward females could suggest that food resources are more than adequate for the number of breeding pairs currently nesting in the area, that adults are in relatively good physical condition during the breeding episode, and/or that no other obvious environmental stresses are promoting sex allocation of the least costly sex by the parents. During a concurrent 4-yr study of Ridgway's Hawk feeding ecology, food provisioning rates did not vary between successful and failed nests, there were no incidents of nest failure due to starvation, and excess food was observed at the majority of nests during observations. These findings suggest that food availability was not limited and may have been in ample supply (Woolaver et al. 2013a). There was also no indication that the adults' body conditions were compromised during the study (L. Woolaver unpubl. data). As a result of an adequate prey base, Ridgway's Hawk may have been investing in the more costly sex. Arroyo (2002) found that more female nestlings were produced in years with higher food availability in the dimorphic Montagu's Harrier (Circus pygargus). In a population of the critically endangered Kakapo (Strigops habroptila) that was provided supplementary food, production of young was biased toward males, which in Kakapo are the more costly sex (Clout and Merton 2002).

Nestling sex ratios can also become biased through the selective elimination of the smallest nestlings(s) either by starvation and/or competition and aggression from larger siblings (Viñuela 1999, Bortolotti 1986, Wiebe and Bortolotti 2000). This type of brood reduction is fairly common in many raptors and generally results in biased nestling sex ratios (Bortolotti 1986). However, there was no evidence of this type of brood reduction during the present study. To our knowledge, 80% of nests (50/63) did not exhibit any reduction in size between the clutch and brood stages, and in nine cases of reduction the causes identified were infertility (n  =  3) and botfly parasitism (n  =  6). Furthermore, there were no observations of aggression among nestlings over the 5-yr study period.

Several other factors have been found to affect sex ratio including age of parents, clutch size, egg mass, and laying order. Ferrer et al. (2009) documented a sex-ratio distortion for the endangered Spanish Imperial Eagle (Aquila adalberti) where younger breeding birds produced significantly more male-biased broods. Wu et al. (2010) found that clutch size and egg mass affected the secondary brood sex ratio of the Eurasian Kestrel (Falco tinnunculus) with larger clutches and heavier eggs producing more male nestlings. Laying date can also affect the secondary sex ratios, with eggs laid earlier producing a greater proportion of males (Griggio et al. 2002, Wu et al. 2010). It is recommended that breeding Ridgway's Hawk pairs continue to be monitored to determine if any age-related trends in breeding pairs, or laying patterns or characteristics (size, date, egg mass) are responsible for sex-ratio distortion of Ridgway's Hawk nestlings.

If the trend toward a female-biased sex ratio found in this study is related to environmental and breeding conditions, then this could be a positive sign for the population. However, molecular evidence has revealed that inbreeding is occurring in the population and that up to 18% of potential random pairings of Ridgway's Hawk could be inbred (Woolaver et al. 2013b). Although directional distortions in sex ratio do not appear to be a consistent signal of inbreeding depression, small random populations can exhibit severe distortions from autosomal sex-limited alleles that have drifted in isolated populations (Frankham and Wilcken 2006). Inbreeding can potentially distort sex ratios by reducing the proportion of the homogametic sex (Worthington-Wilmer et al. 1993, Eldridge et al. 1999). If this were occurring within the Ridgway's Hawk population, we would expect distortions toward female-biased broods among breeding pairs. Since our result did reveal a trend toward the production of female nestlings, it would be important for future population research to continue monitoring the sex ratio of this small vulnerable population and incorporate this component into any future conservation strategy (Ferrer et al. 2009). At the moment, the current trend toward female-biased broods is not significant enough on its own to warrant brood-specific intensive management (i.e., brood manipulations) of this critically endangered species, but caution is warranted and monitoring of nestling sex-ratio should be a priority.

Acknowledgments

We thank N. Collar, J. Wiley, R. Thorstrom, S. Latta, D. Wege, J. Shore, L. Packer, and A. Zayed for their advice during our study. A number of people provided significant contributions to this study particularly with searching for hawks, including J. Almonte, J. Cespedes, N. Corona, S. Balbuena de la Rosa, T. Bueno Hernandez, P. de Leon Franco, T. Nichols, J. Sinclair, H. Jorge Polanco, and J. Vetter. J. Brocca, E. Fernández, and the Sociedad Ornitólogica Hispaniola provided much appreciated logistical support. B. Woolfenden and S. Tarof provided invaluable guidance and advice at the YUMEL laboratory. All research was carried out with the permission of Subsecretaría de Estado de Areas Protegidas y Biodiversidad, and the Secretaría de Estado de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales, Republica Dominicana. The research was funded by Wildlife Preservation Canada, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and the James Bond Fund of the Smithsonian Institution. We would particularly like to thank E. Williams and K. Wallace for their support throughout the study.

Literature Cited

1.

F.S.R Amaral F.S Sheldon A Gamauf E Haring M Riesing L.F Silveira and A Wajntal 2009. Patterns and processes of diversification in a widespread and ecologically diverse avian group, the buteonine hawks (Aves, Accipitridae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 53:703–715. Google Scholar

2.

B.E Arroyo 2002. Fledgling sex ratio variation and future reproductive probability in Montagu's Harrier Circus pygargus. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 52:109–116. Google Scholar

3.

J.C Avise and W.S Nelson 1989. Molecular genetic relationships of the extinct Dusky Seaside Sparrow. Science 243:646–648. Google Scholar

4.

G.R Bortolotti 1986. Influence of sibling competition on nestling sex-ratios of sexually dimorphic birds. American Naturalist 127:495–507. Google Scholar

5.

E Bro F Sarrazin J Clobert and F Reitz 2000. Demography and the decline of the Grey Partridge Perdix perdix in France. Journal of Applied Ecology 37:432–448. Google Scholar

6.

B.W Brook M.A Burgman and R Frankham 2000. Differences and congruencies between PVA packages: the importance of sex ratio for predictions of extinction risk. Conservation Ecology 4:6  http://www.consecol.org/vol4/iss1/art6 (last accessed 12 July 2010). Google Scholar

7.

P Byholm J.E Brommer and P Saurola 2002. Scale and seasonal sex ratio trends in Northern Goshawk Accipiter gentilis broods. Journal of Avian Biology 33:399–406. Google Scholar

8.

M.N Clout and D.V Merton 2002. Saving the Kakapo: the conservation of the world's most peculiar parrot. Bird Conservation International 8:281–296. Google Scholar

9.

T.H Clutton-Brock 1986. Sex ratio variation in birds. Ibis 128:317–329. Google Scholar

10.

C.B Cory 1885. The birds of Haiti and San Domingo. Estes and Lauriat, Boston, MA U.S.A. Google Scholar

11.

C.R Dykstra J.L Hays and S.T Crocoll 2008. Red-shouldered Hawk (Buteo lineatus). In A Poole [Ed.], The birds of North America online, No. 107. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY U.S.A.  http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/107 (last accessed 12 July 2010). Google Scholar

12.

C.R Dykstra H.L Mays Jr J.L Hays M.M Simon and A.R Wegman 2012. Sexing adult and nestling Red-shouldered Hawks using morphometrics and molecular techniques. Journal of Raptor Research 46:357–364. Google Scholar

13.

M Eldridge J King A Loupis P Spencer A Taylor L Pope and G Hall 1999. Unprecedented low levels of genetic variation and inbreeding depression in an island population of the black-footed rock-wallaby. Conservation Biology 13:531–541. Google Scholar

14.

H Ellegren and B.C Sheldon 1997. New tools for sex identification and the study of sex allocation in birds. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 12:255–259. Google Scholar

15.

K.E Erikstad J.O Bustnes S.H Lorentsen and T.K Reiertsen 2009. Sex ratio in Lesser Black-backed Gull in relation to environmental pollutants. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 63:931–938. Google Scholar

16.

J Ferguson-Lees and D.A Christie 2001. Raptors of the world. Christopher Helm, London, U.K. Google Scholar

17.

M Ferrer I Newton and M Pandolfi 2009. Small populations and offspring sex-ratio deviations in eagles. Conservation Biology 23:1017–1025. Google Scholar

18.

M Ferrer F Otalora and J.M Garcia-Ruiz 2004. Density-dependent age of first reproduction as a buffer affecting persistence of small populations. Ecological Applications 14:616–624. Google Scholar

19.

R Frankham 2010. Where are we in conservation genetics and where do we need to go? Conservation Genetics 11:661–663. Google Scholar

20.

R Frankham and J Wilcken 2006. Does inbreeding distort sex ratios? Conservation Genetics 7:879–893. Google Scholar

21.

A.K Fridolfsson and H Ellegren 1999. A simple and universal method for molecular sexing of non-ratite birds. Journal of Avian Biology 30:116–121. Google Scholar

22.

W Gabriel and R Burger 1992. Survival of small populations under demographic stochasticity. Theoretical Population Biology 41:44–71. Google Scholar

23.

M Genovart M Surroca A MartÍnez-AbraÍn and J Jiménez 2008. Parity in fledgling sex ratios in a dimorphic raptor, the Montagu's Harrier Circus pygargus. Zoological Studies 47:11–16. Google Scholar

24.

M Griggio F Hamerstrom R.N Rosenfield and G Tavecchia 2002. Seasonal variation in sex ratio of fledgling American Kestrels: a long term study. Wilson Bulletin 114:474–478. Google Scholar

25.

C Harcourt and J Sayer [Eds.]. 1996. The conservation atlas of tropical forests: the Americas. Simon and Schuster, New York, NY U.S.A. Google Scholar

26.

T Hipkiss B Horneeldt U Eklund and S Berlin 2002. Year-dependent sex-biased mortality in supplementary-fed Tengmalm's Owl nestlings. Journal of Animal Ecology 71:693–699. Google Scholar

27.

M Ingraldi 2005. A skewed sex ratio in Northern Goshawks: is it a sign of a stressed population? Journal of Raptor Research 39:247–252. Google Scholar

28.

IUCN. 2010. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2010.2.  www.iucnredlist.org (last accessed 12 July 2010). Google Scholar

29.

R Kilner 1998. Primary and secondary sex ratio manipulation by Zebra Finches. Animal Behaviour 56:155–164. Google Scholar

30.

E Korpimäki C.A May D.T Parkin J.H Wetton and J Whien 2000. Environmental and parental condition-related variation in sex ratio of kestrel broods. Journal of Avian Biology 31:128–134. Google Scholar

31.

T Laaksonen J.A Fargallo E Korpimäki S Lyytinen J Valkama and V Pöyri 2004. Year- and sex-dependent effects of experimental brood sex ratio manipulation on fledging condition of Eurasian Kestrels. Journal of Animal Ecology 73:342–352. Google Scholar

32.

S.C Latta C Rimmer A Keith J Wiley H Raffaele K McFarland and E Fernandez 2006. Birds of the Dominican Republic and Haiti. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ U.S.A. Google Scholar

33.

A Leroux and V Bretagnolle 1996. Sex ratio variations in broods of Montagu's Harriers Circus pygargus. Journal of Avian Biology 27:63–69. Google Scholar

34.

M.J.L Magrath E Van Lieshout I Pen G.H Visser and J Komdeur 2007. Estimating expenditure on male and female offspring in a sexually size-dimorphic bird: a comparison of different methods. Journal of Animal Ecology 76:1169–1180. Google Scholar

35.

P.W.C Paton E.J Messina and C.R Griffin 1994. A phylogenetic approach to reversed size dimorphism in diurnal raptors. Oikos 71:492–498. Google Scholar

36.

C.C Rimmer J.M Townsend A.K Townsend E.M Fernandez and J Almonte 2005. Avian diversity, abundance, and conservation status in the Macaya Biosphere Reserve of Haiti. Ornitologica Neotropical 16:219–230. Google Scholar

37.

M Risch and M.W.G Brinkhof 2002. Sex ratios of sparrowhawk (Accipiter nisus) broods: the importance of age in males. Ornis Fennica 79:49–59. Google Scholar

38.

E Rossmanith N Blaum V Grimm and F Jeltsch 2007. Pattern oriented modelling for estimating unknown pre-breeding survival rates: the case of the Lesser Spotted Woodpecker (Picoides minor). Biological Conservation 135:555–564. Google Scholar

39.

E Rossmanith V Grimm N Blaum and F. Jeltsch 2006. Behavioural flexibility in the mating system buffers population persistence: lessons from the Lesser Spotted Woodpecker (Picoides minor). Journal of Animal Ecology 75:540–548. Google Scholar

40.

G Seutin B.N White and P.T Boag 1991. Preservation of avian blood and tissue samples for DNA analyses. Canadian Journal of Zoology 69:82–90. Google Scholar

41.

D.S Simberloff 1988. The contribution of population and community biology to conservation science. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 19:473–511. Google Scholar

42.

N.F.R Snyder and J.W Wiley 1976. Sexual size dimorphism in hawks and owls of North America. Ornithological Monographs 20. Google Scholar

43.

SPSS. 2003. SPSS for Windows, release 12.0.0. SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL U.S.A. Google Scholar

44.

R Thorstrom 1996. Methods for trapping tropical forest birds of prey. Wildlife Society Bulletin. 24:516–520. Google Scholar

45.

R Torres and H Drummond 1997. Female-biased mortality in nestlings of birds with size dimorphism. Journal of Animal Ecology 66:859–865. Google Scholar

46.

A Trnka P Prokop M Kašová K Sobeková and L' Kocian 2012. Hatchling sex ratio and female mating status in the Great Reed Warbler, Acrocephalus arundinaceus further evidence for offspring sex ratio manipulation. Italian Journal of Zoology 79:212–217. Google Scholar

47.

J Viñuela 1999. Sibling aggression, hatching asynchrony, and nestling mortality in the Black Kite (Milvus migrans). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 45:33–45. Google Scholar

48.

A Villegas J.M Sanchez-Guzman E Costillo C Casimiro and R Moran 2004. Productivity and fledgling sex ratio in a Cinereous Vulture (Aegypius monachus) population in Spain. Journal of Raptor Research 38:361–366. Google Scholar

49.

A Wetmore and F. C Lincoln 1934. Additional notes on the birds of Haiti and the Dominican Republic. Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum 82:1–68. Google Scholar

50.

K.L Wiebe and G.R Bortolotti 1992. Facultative sex ratio manipulation in American Kestrels. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 30:379–386. Google Scholar

51.

K. L Wiebe and G. R Bortolotti 2000. Parental interference in sibling aggression in birds: what should we look for? Ecoscience 7:1–9. Google Scholar

52.

J Wilcken 2001. The cost of inbreeding revisited: inbreeding, longevity and sex-ratio. M.S. thesis. Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia. Google Scholar

53.

J.W Wiley and B Wiley 1981. Breeding season ecology and behavior of Ridgway's Hawk Buteo ridgwayi. Condor 83:132–151. Google Scholar

54.

L.G Woolaver 2011. Ecology and conservation genetics of Ridgway's Hawk Buteo ridgwayi. Ph.D. dissertation. York University, Toronto, ON, Canada. Google Scholar

55.

L.G Woolaver R.K Nichols E Morton and B.J Stutchbury 2013a. Feeding ecology and specialist diet of critically endangered Ridgway's Hawks. Journal of Field Ornithology (in press). Google Scholar

56.

L.G Woolaver R.K Nichols E Morton and B.J Stutchbury 2013b. Population genetics and relatedness in the critically endangered island raptor, Ridgway's Hawk Buteo ridgwayi. Conservation Genetics (in press). DOI: 10.1007/s10592-013-0444-4. Google Scholar

57.

J.M Worthington-Wilmer A Melzer F Carrick and C Moritz 1993. Low genetic diversity and inbreeding depression in Queensland koalas. Wildlife Research 20:177–188. Google Scholar

58.

H Wu H Wang Y Jiang F Lei and W Gao 2010. Offspring sex ratio in Eurasian Kestrel (Falco tinnunculus) with reversed sexual size dimorphism. Chinese Birds 1:36–44. Google Scholar
The Raptor Research Foundation, Inc.
Lance G. Woolaver "Nestling Sex Ratio in a Critically Endangered Dimorphic Raptor, Ridgway's Hawk (Buteo ridgwayi)," Journal of Raptor Research 47(2), 117-126, (1 June 2013). https://doi.org/10.3356/JRR-12-35.1
Received: 17 May 2012; Accepted: 1 December 2012; Published: 1 June 2013
JOURNAL ARTICLE
10 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top