Translator Disclaimer
1 March 2014 Genetic Evidence for Global Dispersal in the Peregrine Falcon (Falco peregrinus) and Affinity with the Taita Falcon (Falco fasciinucha)
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

We analyzed variation in cytochrome b mitochondrial DNA sequences in 11 subspecies of the Peregrine Falcon (Falco peregrinus), three samples of the Taita Falcon (F. fasciinucha) from Africa, and several other Falco and outgroup species, to assess haplotype diversity in the Peregrine Falcon on a worldwide basis. We identified 16 haplotypes from 31 Peregrine Falcon samples, of which 11 were unique and 5 were shared among two or more subspecies. There was neither concordance between cytochrome b variation and taxonomic designation at the subspecies level, nor any phylogeographic pattern in the genetic data. The Taita Falcon was nested within the Peregrine Falcon clade. Percent sequence divergence between the Taita Falcon and the Peregrine Falcon (0.4–1.2%) overlapped that among subspecies of the Peregrine Falcon (0.0–1.0%), suggesting very close genetic affinity between the two species. We hypothesize that historical and recent dispersal, combined with rapid morphological evolution, contributed to the lack of concordance between variation in cytochrome b mitochondrial DNA sequences and phylogeography in the Peregrine Falcon.

Analizamos la variación en el citocromo b de secuencias de ADN mitocondrial en 11 subespecies de Falco peregrinus, en tres muestras de F. fasciinucha de África y en otros Falco y especies fuera del grupo para determinar la diversidad de haplotipos en F. peregrinus a escala mundial. Identificamos 16 haplotipos en 31 muestras de F. peregrinus, de las cuales 11 fueron únicas y 5 estuvieron compartidas entre dos o más subespecies. No hubo concordancia entre la variación del citocromo b y la designación taxonómica a nivel de subespecie, ni en el patrón filogeográfico en los datos genéticos. F. fasciinucha estuvo anidado dentro del clado de F. peregrinus. La divergencia porcentual de secuencia entre F. peregrinus y F. fasciinucha (0.4–1.2%) se superpuso con la de subespecies de F. peregrinus (0.0–1.0%), sugiriendo una afinidad genética muy cercana entre las dos especies. Hipotetizamos que la dispersión histórica y reciente, combinada con una evolución morfológica rápida, contribuyó a la falta de concordancia entre la variación en el citocromo b de secuencias de ADN mitocondrial y la filogeografía en F. peregrinus.

The Peregrine Falcon (Falco peregrinus) is a cosmopolitan species that inhabits every continent except Antarctica and is well known for its extensive wandering (Cade 1982). Migrants move annually great distances between the northern and southern hemispheres (Fuller et al. 1998), and records of spectacular peregrinations exist; e.g., between the United States and Japan (although possibly facilitated by maritime traffic; White et al. 2002) and between the United States and Switzerland (Doolittle and Berger 2013). Although the species is relatively philopatric, at the scale of hundreds of kilometers or less (Mearns and Newton 1984, Tordoff and Redig 1997), the potential exists for Peregrine Falcons to disperse to nearly any region of the globe.

Depending on the authority, the Peregrine Falcon is currently subdivided into 16–19 subspecies based on geographic variation (White and Boyce 1988, Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001). Although plumage and morphological variation between some geographic races follows a clinal pattern, differences between adjacent subspecies may be striking. For example, the red-naped shaheen (F. peregrinus babylonicus) and the black shaheen (F. peregrinus peregrinator) exhibit remarkable plumage differences (Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001). Thus, understanding the effect of the Peregrine Falcon's innate dispersal ability on its evolutionary history and current geographic diversity is a challenge.

In contrast to the Peregrine Falcon, the Taita Falcon (Falco fasciinucha) is a rare and local species endemic to East Africa (Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001). Although this monotypic species has been described as a “miniature peregrine” based on its anatomical characters and mode of life (Brown 1971), its evolutionary relationship to the Peregrine Falcon remains obscure.

We present results from a global survey of variation in cytochrome b mitochondrial DNA (hereafter cyt b mtDNA) in 11 subspecies of Peregrine Falcon. We included in our survey the Taita Falcon, several other falcon species, and outgroup taxa. We compare genetic variation with the phylogeographic distribution of the Peregrine Falcon. We discuss possible consequences of dispersal in the Peregrine Falcon, and its close genetic affinity with the Taita Falcon.

Materials and Methods

Taxon Sampling

We included 45 individuals in the analysis (Table 1): 31 Peregrine Falcons (from 11 subspecies), 3 Taita Falcons, and 11 outgroup samples from nine species. We downloaded six of the sequences from GenBank: one Peregrine Falcon, one Red-footed Falcon (Falco vespertinus), one Laughing Falcon (Herpetotheres cachinnans), one Collared Forest-Falcon (Micrastur semitorquatus), one Sharp-shinned Hawk (Accipiter striatus), and one American Kestrel (Falco sparverius). Excluding the GenBank sequences, 95% of our samples were of known geographic origin, taken from wild-caught birds or captive-bred birds from lineages of known origin.

Table 1.

Specimen information for falcons subject to genetic analyses. Haplotype letter designations for F. peregrinus and F. fasciinucha correspond to those listed in Table 2.

i0892-1016-48-1-44-t01.tif

Molecular Analysis

We preserved blood samples and, in one case a feather with bloody pulp, in Longmire's Lysis Buffer (Longmire et al. 1988) and stored them at −70°C. We extracted DNA using either standard phenol-chloroform protocols or DNeasy tissue-extraction kits (QIAGEN, Alameda, California, U.S.A.). We amplified and sequenced the cyt b mtDNA gene via the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the following combinations of primer pairs and according to standard protocols (Griffiths 1997):

  • L 14841 (5′-CCATCCACCATCTCAGCATGATGAAA) and H 15149 (5′-CCCTCAGAATGATATTTGTCCTCA)

  • L 15132 (5′-CTAATAGCAACAGCCTTCGTC) and H 15516 (5′-GACTAGGGGATTTGCTGGTGTAAAG)

  • L 15489 (5′-CTAGCCCTATTTACCCCAAACCTG) and H 15915 (5′-GGAGTCTTCAGTCTCTGGTTTACAAGAC)

  • 6F (ND5) (5′-GGGTCTTTCGCCCTATCAATC) and 6R (tRNA thr) (5′-CTAAGAAGGTTATAGGCCTTCAC).

The first three primer pairs amplified internal segments of 307 base pairs (bp), 337 bp, and 376 bp in length, respectively, while the latter pair amplified the entire cyt b mtDNA gene. For quality control purposes, we extracted all but two samples (LO1 and LO2) at least twice (Table 1). To control for the presence of nuclear pseudogenes (Sorensen and Fleischer 1996), we cross-checked sequences resulting from internally amplified segments of the cyt b gene with sequences resulting from entire-gene amplifications. We cycle sequenced the PCR products using an ABI PRISM Model 310 sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, U.S.A.) or other automated sequencers.

Data Analysis

We trimmed primer sequences and assembled them as contiguous fragments using Sequencher software (Gene Codes Corp., Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A.). There were no indels and we aligned final sequences by eye.

To examine homogeneity of base composition among study taxa, we used a chi-square test implemented in PAUP* (Swofford 2001) to ensure that rooting of outgroups was not influenced by base composition heterogeneity. We performed phylogenetic analyses with maximum parsimony using the branch-and-bound algorithm in PAUP*. To calculate support for nodes, we ran 100 replicate bootstrap searches with maximum parsimony, using the heuristic algorithm with TBR (tree bisection and reconnection) branch swapping. We used the Sharp-shinned Hawk, representing the family Accipitridae, as an outgroup to the Falconidae (Griffiths 1994). Herpetotheres cachinnans and Micrastur semitorquatus, representing the subfamily Herpetotherinae, served as a nested clade that was basal to Falco (Griffiths et al. 2004).

Population-level analyses may lack phylogenetic structure, because ancestral and descendant haplotypes may coexist or reticulate relationships may exist among haplotypes. Thus, the hierarchical tree format may be inappropriate for representing relationships among haplotypes (Posada and Crandall 2001). In such cases, haplotype networks more consistently depict relationships among the sampled haplotypes. We used TCS software (phylogenetic network estimation using statistical parsimony; Clement et al. 2000) to construct a haplotype network for the Peregrine Falcon and Taita Falcon sequences, using a representative of the “hierofalco” complex, the Lanner Falcon (Falco biarmicus), as an outgroup (Nittinger et al. 2005).

Results

Sequence Divergence

Amplification and sequencing of the 41 individuals yielded 1044 bp of cyt b. We included four additional outgroup sequences (trimmed to the same 1044 bp region) downloaded from GenBank. Among these 45 sequences, 352 (34%) of the 1044 characters were variable and 234 (22%) were phylogenetically informative.

Sequence divergence between pairs of Peregrine Falcon sequences was low (0.0–1.0%). Divergence between Peregrine Falcons and Taita Falcons ranged from 0.5–1.1%. Divergence between Peregrine Falcons and outgroups was greater, ranging from 3.8–11.0% for other Falco species, 14.8–17.1% for Herpetotheres and Micrastur, and 17.6–18.0% for Accipiter.

Our analyses revealed 16 Peregrine Falcon haplotypes among the 31 sequences (Tables 1 and 2). Haplotype A, not found in any of our samples, corresponded to the published mtDNA genome of the Peregrine Falcon (Mindell et al. 1999). Eleven haplotypes (C, F, G, H, J, L, M, N, O, P, and Q) were unique (found in only one subspecies or geographic area) and the remaining 20 samples fell into five haplotypes: (1) Haplotype B: F. p. tundrius SAS229, F. p. minor ZFC2 and ZFC4, F. p. macropus DS1, and F. p. anatum JP14 and 2H, from North America, Africa, and Australia; (2) Haplotype D: F. p. anatum DS5, DS7, and LB3, and F. p. pealei WN29, from North America; (3) Haplotype E: F. p. cassini ALB1, F. p. pelegrinoides LO2, F. p. minor ZFC1, F. p. tundrius LAB4, and F. p. anatum MG6, from South America, Middle East/Africa, and North America; (4) Haplotype I: F. p. tundrius MG2 and MG5, and F. p. brookei A8, from North America and Europe; (5) Haplotype K: F. p. minor RH6 and F. p. tundrius LAB1, from North America and Africa.

Table 2.

Eighteen mitochondrial DNA haplotypes observed among Peregrine Falcon (A-Q) and Taita Falcon (R) samples. Vertical numbers refer to positions of variable nucleotides within 1044 bp of cyt b sequence, corresponding to the published mitochondrial genome of Falco peregrinus (haplotype A, GenBank Accession No. AF90388). Dots under nucleotide positions indicate an identical nucleotide as given with Haplotype A. See Table 1 for haplotype assignments by specimen.

i0892-1016-48-1-44-t02.tif

These haplotypes reflect neither taxonomic designation nor geographic origin (Tables 1 and 2). Haplotypes B, D, and I differed from haplotype E by a single substitution, whereas haplotype I differed by seven substitutions. The three Taita Falcon samples had a unique haplotype (Haplotype R, Table 2).

Phylogenetic Inference

There was no significant base composition heterogeneity among the 45 initial taxa. For the phylogenetic analysis, we eliminated redundant taxa, yielding a final matrix with 28 taxa and 1044 characters. Phylogenetic inference yielded 300 trees with length 551 steps (Consistency Index  =  0.5699 and Retention Index  =  0.6981). The majority-rule consensus tree showed that the Peregrine Falcon subspecies and the Taita Falcon formed a single clade (Fig. 1), which was noteworthy because the Taita Falcon did not group with any of the smaller-sized falcons tested here: Greater Kestrel (F. rupicoloides), Eurasian Hobby (F. subbuteo), Red-footed Falcon, Aplomado Falcon (F. femoralis), and American Kestrel.

Figure 1.

Strict consensus tree inferred from sequences of Falco peregrinus subspecies, F. fasciinucha, and outgroups. Terminal taxa labeled as Haplotypes B, D, E, I and K are groups of identical Peregrine Falcon sequences; refer to text for listing of samples assigned to each Haplotype. Terminal taxon labeled “F. fasciinucha RH9” includes all three identical Taita Falcon sequences. See text for details.

i0892-1016-48-1-44-f01.tif

Relationships of the taxa within the Peregrine Falcon/Taita Falcon clade were unresolved. Five haplotypes were shared among multiple subspecies of Peregrine Falcon (Fig. 1). The minimum spanning tree inferred from the estimation of haplotype relationships provided more structure (Fig. 2); however, there was no clear biogeographic signal. Haplotype E included sequences from four specimens of known origin in Africa, South America, and North America. Another specimen in this group, F. p. pelegrinoides, was of unknown origin, but the subspecies range includes northern Africa and the Middle East. We found Haplotype B in samples from the Canadian arctic, South Africa, Australia, and the Pacific coast of North America. Haplotypes were shared among widely disparate geographic regions; e.g., three haplotypes found in the North American arctic and sub-Saharan Africa were shared.

Figure 2.

Minimum-spanning network of Falco fasciinucha and 16 haplotypes of Falco peregrinus subspecies. The haplotypes displayed as squares represent shared haplotypes; refer to text for listing of samples assigned to each haplotype. The square labeled F. fasciinucha represents identical Taita Falcon sequences. Refer to Table 1 for a complete listing of haplotypes.

i0892-1016-48-1-44-f02.tif

We also found unique haplotypes in widely disparate geographic regions. North American samples yielded five unique haplotypes, and we found two each in samples from Europe, sub-Saharan Africa, and Fiji. The minimum spanning tree also showed that the Taita Falcon haplotype differed by five substitutions from the closest Peregrine Falcon haplotype, found in arctic North America and Spain (Haplotype I, Fig. 2).

Discussion

Our study suggests that haplotype diversity and sequence divergence in the cyt b mtDNA gene in Peregrine Falcons is comparable to that found in other falcons. For instance, we found 16 haplotypes in 31 specimens, and Nittinger et al. (2005, 2007) found 14 haplotypes of the CR-ps gene (456–458 bp) in 22 specimens of the Lanner Falcon from sub-Saharan Africa. Two other studies compared a 559-bp segment of the mtDNA control region of Peregrine Falcons. White et al. (2013) found 30 haplotypes in 219 individuals from 12 subspecies in 27 locations; 17 were unique haplotypes. Talbot et al. (2011) found 14 haplotypes in 65 Peregrine Falcons sampled across seven populations; 10 were private haplotypes (found in a single population). These two studies suggest that haplotype diversity can be quite high regionally, and show similar proportions of shared haplotypes among all individuals sampled (0.061 and 0.059, respectively).

The overall lack of concordance between mtDNA variation and taxonomic designation at the subspecies level observed here is consistent with similar studies in other falcons, including members in the hierofalco group: Lanner Falcon and Saker Falcon (F. cherrug; Wink et al. 2004; Nittinger et al. 2005, 2007), and Gyrfalcon (F. rusticolus; Nittinger et al. 2005, 2007; Johnson et al. 2007). Wink et al. (2000) found some clustering among three subspecies of peregrines, but only when using neighbor joining; maximum parsimony showed no resolution. In population genetic studies incorporating both mtDNA and microsatellite data, Brown et al. (2007) and Johnson et al. (2010) found F. p. pealei to be distinct from the other two North American subspecies, F. p. anatum and F. p. tundrius, with no genetic support for designating the latter two taxa as separate subspecies. In contrast, within a subspecific taxon, the northern and southern populations of the nominate F. p. peregrinus in Scandinavia revealed genetic distinctiveness within both contemporary (Nesje et al. 2000) and historical time frames (Jacobsen et al. 2008). White et al. (2013) confirmed a general lack of concordance between control region mtDNA variation and 12 subspecies of Peregrine Falcons, but found some evidence for the genetic distinctiveness of island populations of Peregrine Falcons, several of which are well-defined subspecies. Our results are based on 11 subspecies of Peregrine Falcons with nearly half of the samples from North America, where extensive reintroduction efforts with nonnative subspecies was accomplished in the eastern and midwestern United States (Tordoff and Redig 1997, 2001). Some of the haplotype diversity revealed here may have resulted from admixture of genotypes, which would obscure phylogenetic patterns (but see below). Greater density sampling of Peregrine Falcon subspecies will be necessary to fully understand the systematics of this species at both the population and taxonomic level.

Lack of concordance between morphological and genetic data implies that differential rates of evolution occur between phenotypic characters and genetic markers. Genetic evidence suggests that the Peregrine Falcon is a recently diverged species (Nittinger et al. 2005, White et al. 2013). So for this species, morphological differentiation, as defined by subspecific variation, may proceed at rates faster than mtDNA sequence evolution (see also White et al. 2013). This could be seen as an adaptive response to varied environmental conditions. Kruckenhauser et al. (2004) showed that rapid differentiation in 92 morphological characters in several western Palearctic buzzard species in the genus Buteo was not accompanied by mitochondrial genome differentiation. Rapid morphological change in response to anthropogenic influences, occurring on the order of a century, also has been demonstrated in some raptors (Pereva and Grazhdankin 1994). Thus, it is feasible that widespread phenotypic differentiation, as seen in the 16–19 subspecies of Peregrine Falcon, albeit occurring on the order of thousands of years, may reflect an adaptive response to the wide range of environmental conditions faced by this circumpolar species.

We identified two private haplotypes of cyt b in F. p. nesiotes, the subspecies of Peregrine Falcon found in the Fiji Islands of the South Pacific (White et al. 1998). Members of this subspecies exhibit near-identical morphology and have high genetic similarity based on DNA fingerprinting (White et al. 1988, 1993), microsatellite loci, and control region mtDNA (Talbot et al. 2011). In contrast to our cyt b results, Talbot et al. (2011) found a single haplotype in the mtDNA control region in F. p. nesiotes. This haplotype was neither private nor did it originate from one of the neighboring subspecies of Peregrine Falcon, F. p. macropus of Australia. As an explanation for the overall low genetic polymorphism in F. p. nesiotes, Talbot et al. (2011) could not differentiate between bottleneck effects or sustained isolation through evolutionary time, partly due to a lack of museum reference specimens. To date, genetic signatures resulting from the DDT-era induced population bottlenecks in Peregrine Falcons have not been clearly detected (Brown et al. 2007, Jacobsen et al. 2008). Further sampling of island populations of Peregrine Falcons (e.g., F. p. ernesti, F. p. furuitii, and F. p. madens) may shed light on levels of polymorphism in island forms.

Our analysis of sequence variation in cyt b did not recover any phylogeographic pattern. Two hypotheses, not necessarily exclusive, could account for this: historical dispersal followed by incomplete lineage sorting with retention of ancestral polymorphisms (Johnson et al. 2007) or contemporary (ongoing) dispersal of maternal lineages worldwide. Identical haplotypes found in samples of morphologically distinct subspecies of Peregrine Falcons from North America, South America, Australia, Europe, and Africa support the concept of incomplete lineage sorting of ancestral haplotypes, as does the phylogeographic structure unveiled by microsatellite DNA analysis of Peregrine Falcons in Scandinavia (Nesje et al. 2000). However, the sharing of some haplotypes on a global basis may be more reflective of contemporary dispersal, whether natural or human-mediated through recovery efforts, which would erase the relationship between population-level haplotype genetic distance and geography (Neigel and Avise 1993, Oomen et al. 2011). The Peregrine Falcon does exhibit maternal-biased dispersal (Mearns and Newton 1984, Tordoff and Redig 1997, Dennhardt and Wakamiya 2013, Faccio et al. 2013) and a remarkable ability to reach all corners of the globe, whether during migration (e.g., from Greenland to southern Chile; del Hoyo et al. 1994) or as pioneering dispersers (e.g., a nestling banded at Lake Powell in the southwestern United States was later recovered in Japan; B. Anderson, Falcon Research Group, Bow, Washington, U.S.A. pers. comm.). Although most of the samples analyzed here originated from source populations that were acquired at the outset of recovery efforts, we cannot rule out genetic admixture via anthropogenic-induced dispersal and manipulation through Peregrine Falcon recovery efforts (Nesje et al. 2000, Brown et al. 2007, Jacobsen et al. 2008, Johnson et al. 2010). We hypothesize that historical and recent dispersal combined with rapid morphological evolution explains the lack of concordance between variation in cyt b mtDNA sequences and phylogeography in the Peregrine Falcon. Further work will be required to decipher the relative contribution of historical versus contemporary dispersal in haplotype sharing.

The percent sequence divergence between the Taita Falcon and Peregrine Falcon (0.4–1.2%) overlapped the range of divergence among Peregrine Falcon subspecies (0.0–1.0%). This close genetic relationship and the clustering of the Taita Falcon within the Peregrine Falcon clade is consistent with the results derived from studies based on the mtDNA control region (White et al. 2013) and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) genes (Gangoso et al. 2012). These data suggest very close genetic affinity of the Taita Falcon with the Peregrine Falcon. Although the Taita Falcon is approximately half the size of the Peregrine Falcon (Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001), its proportions and behavior have been categorized as peregrine-like (Cade 1982). The two species breed sympatrically in sub-Saharan Africa (Brown 1971, Hartley 2000) and nest in close proximity to one another. In the Zambezi River Gorge on the Zambia/Zimbabwe border, the Taita Falcon exhibits strong interspecific aggression toward Peregrine Falcons (Dowsett 1980). Interestingly, some naive Peregrine Falcons (i.e., those with no prior contact with Taita Falcons) react with recognition behavior upon seeing a Taita Falcon. For example, a male Taita Falcon flown for falconry in North America elicited courtship/recognition behavior from wild female Peregrine Falcons (H. Peeters pers. comm.) and a captive F. p. nesiotes × macropus (South Pacific/Australia; D. Bell unpubl. data). Regardless of taxonomic status, the time since divergence between these two species, assuming mtDNA evolves at a constant rate of 2% per million years (Johnson and Cicero 2004), would have occurred at least 250,000 years ago. This time frame is consistent with other studies suggesting a recent origin for the Peregrine Falcon (Nittinger et al. 2005, White et al. 2013). This period corresponds with the warm Holstein interglacial, when tundra was restricted and fragmented (Newton 2003). Such conditions may have been conducive to rapid global dispersal in the Peregrine Falcon.

This study compared sequences from only a few small falcons, from which the Taita Falcon clearly diverged: Eurasian Hobby, Greater Kestrel, Red-footed Falcon, American Kestrel, and Aplomado Falcon. Additional comparative genetic work on a wide range of falcon species is required to further clarify the evolutionary relationships between the Taita Falcon and Peregrine Falcon.

Acknowledgments

We thank the following individuals and entities for supplying Peregrine Falcon blood samples: Rashid Aman (National Museums of Kenya); George McAllister (Botswana Falconer's Club); P.J. Mundy (Department of National Parks and Wildlife Management, Zimbabwe); Tim Wagner (Transvaal Falconer's Club, South Africa); Alan Harvey (Cape Falconry Club, South Africa); Dick Hendry (Glasgow Museum, Scotland); Robert Prys-Jones (The Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom), Luis Carlo Alonzo, Devina Redentor, and Luis Garcia (Spain); Lynn Oliphant, Robin Johnston, Patty Thompson (Saskatchewan Cooperative Falcon Project, Canada); R. Wayne Nelson (Alberta); Joe Brazil (Department of Tourism and Culture, Wildlife Division, Newfoundland, Canada); David Bird and Ivan Ritchie (Avian Science and Conservation Center, McGill University, Quebec, Canada); Brian Walton, deceased (Santa Cruz Predatory Bird Research Group, California, U.S.A.); Jonathan Longmire (Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico, U.S.A.); Nancy Clum (World Center for Birds of Prey and The Peregrine Fund, Boise, Idaho, U.S.A.); Joel Pagel (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Carlsbad, California, U.S.A.); Martin Nugent (Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, U.S.A.); Sterling Bunnel (Berkeley, California, U.S.A.). For laboratory assistance and technical advice, we thank Maren Bell, Peg Wade, Jonathan Longmire, Cristian Oriega, Tom Quinn, and staff of the Conservation Genetics Laboratory, San Francisco State University. Funding for this work was provided by the National Peregrine Foundation, The Anne and Gordon Getty Foundation, The Bernard Osher Foundation, and a Tilton Postdoctoral Fellowship from the California Academy of Sciences. We thank Jeff Smith and two anonymous reviewers for valuable comments on this manuscript. This paper is dedicated to the memory of Ron Hartley.

Literature Cited

1.

J.W Brown P.J Van Coeverden De Groot T.P Birt G Seutin P.T Boagand V.L Friesen 2007. Appraisal of the consequences of the DDT-induced bottleneck on the level and geographic distribution of neutral genetic variation in Canadian Peregrine Falcons, Falco peregrinus. Molecular Ecology 16:327–343. Google Scholar

2.

L Brown 1971. African birds of prey. Houghton Mifflin Co., London, U.K. Google Scholar

3.

T.J Cade 1982. Falcons of the world. Comstock/Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY U.S.A. Google Scholar

4.

M Clement D Posadaand K.A Crandall 2000. TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Molecular Ecology 9:1657–1660. Google Scholar

5.

J del Hoyo A Elliottand J Sargatal [Eds.]. 1994. Handbook of the birds of the world, Vol, 2: New World vultures to guineafowl. Lynx Editions, Barcelona, Spain. Google Scholar

6.

A.J Dennhardtand S.M Wakamiya 2013. Effective dispersal of Peregrine Falcons (Falco peregrinus) in the midwest, U.S.A. Journal of Raptor Research 47:262–270. Google Scholar

7.

T.C.J Doolittleand D.D Berger 2013. Easternmost recovery of a Peregrine Falcon banded in North America. Journal of Raptor Research 47:75–76. Google Scholar

8.

R.J Dowsett 1980. Breeding and other observations on the Taita Falcon Falco fasciinucha. Ibis 125:362–366. Google Scholar

9.

S.D Faccio M Amaral C.J Martin J.D Lloyd T.W Frenchand A Tur 2013. Movement patterns, natal dispersal, and survival of Peregrine Falcons banded in New England. Journal of Raptor Research 47:246–261. Google Scholar

10.

J Ferguson-Leesand D.A Christie 2001. Raptors of the world. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, MA U.S.A. Google Scholar

11.

M.R Fuller W.S Seegerand L.S Schueck 1998. Routes and travel rates of migrating Peregrine Falcons Falco peregrinus and Swainson's Hawks Buteo swainsoni in the western hemisphere. Journal of Avian Biology 29:433–440. Google Scholar

12.

L.M Gangoso J.M Grande J Muñoz S.L Talbot S.A Sonsthagen G.K Sageand J Figuerola 2012. Colonizing the world in spite of reduced MHC variation. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 25:1438–1447. Google Scholar

13.

C.S Griffiths 1994. Monophyly of the Falconiformes based on syringeal morphology. Auk 111:787–805. Google Scholar

14.

C.S Griffiths 1997. Correlation of functional domains and rates of nucleotide substitution in cytochrome b. Molecular Phylogenies and Evolution 7:353–365. Google Scholar

15.

C.S Griffiths G.F Barrowclough J.G Grothand L Mertz 2004. Phylogeny of the Falconidae (Aves): a comparison of the efficacy of morphological, mitochondrial, and nuclear data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 32:101–109. Google Scholar

16.

R.R Hartley 2000. Ecology of the Taita Falco fasciinucha, Peregrine F. peregrinus and Lanner F. biarmicus Falcons in Zimbabwe. Pages 87–105 in R Chancellorand B.-U Meyburg [Eds.], Raptors at risk: proceedings of 5th World Conference on Birds of Prey and Owls. World Working Group on Birds of Prey and Owls, Berlin, Germany, and Hancock House Publishers, Blaine, WA U.S.A. Google Scholar

17.

F Jacobsen M Nesje L Bachmannand J.T Lifjeld 2008. Significant genetic admixture after reintroduction of Peregrine Falcon (Falco peregrinus) in southern Scandinavia. Conservation Genetics 9:581–591. Google Scholar

18.

N.K Johnsonand C Cicero 2004. New mitochondrial data affirm the importance of Pleistocene speciation in North American birds. Evolution 58:1122–1130. Google Scholar

19.

J.A Johnson K.K Burnham W.A Burnhamand D.P Mindell 2007. Genetic structure among continental and island populations of Gyrfalcons. Molecular Ecology 16:3145–3160. Google Scholar

20.

J.A Johnson S.L Talbot G.K Sage K.K Burnham J.W Brown T.L Maechtle W.S Seegar M.A Yates B Andersonand D.P Mindell 2010. The use of genetics for the management of a recovering population: temporal assessment of migratory Peregrine Falcons in North America. PloS One 5:1–15. Google Scholar

21.

L Kruckenhauser E Haring W Pinsker M.J Riesing H Winkler M Winkand A Gamauf 2004. Genetic v. morphological differentiation of Old World buzzards (Genus Buteo, Accipitridae). Zoologica Scripta 33:197–211. Google Scholar

22.

J.L Longmire A.K Lewis N.C Brown J.M Buckingham L.M Clark M.D Jones L.J Meincke J Meyne R.L Ratfliff F.A Ray R.P Wagnerand R.K Moyzis 1988. Isolation and molecular characterization of a highly polymorphic centromeric tandem repeat in the family Falconidae. Genomics 2:14–24. Google Scholar

23.

R Mearnsand I Newton 1984. Turnover and dispersal in a Peregrine Falco peregrinus population. Ibis 126:347–355. Google Scholar

24.

D.P Mindell M.D Sorenson D.E Dimcheff M Hasegawa J.C Astand T Yuri 1999. Interordinal relationships of birds and other reptiles based on whole mitochondrial genomes. Systematic Biology 48:138–152. Google Scholar

25.

J.E Neigeland J.C Avise 1993. Application of a random walk model to geographic distributions of animal mitochondrial DNA variation. Genetics 135:1209–1220. Google Scholar

26.

M Nesje K.H Roed D.A Bell P Lindbergand J.T Lifjeld 2000. Microsatellite analysis of population structure and genetic variability in Peregrine Falcons (Falco peregrinus). Animal Conservation 3:267–275. Google Scholar

27.

I Newton 2003. The speciation and biogeography of birds. Academic Press, London, U.K. Google Scholar

28.

F Nittinger A Gamauf W Pinsker M Winkand E Haring 2007. Phylogeography and population structure of the Saker Falcon (Falco cherrug) and the influence of hybridization: mitochondrial and microsatellite data. Molecular Ecology 16:1497–1517. Google Scholar

29.

F Nittinger E Haring W Pinsker M Winkand A Gamauf 2005. Out of Africa? Phylogenetic relationships between Falco biarmicus and the other hierofalcons (Aves: Falconidae). Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 43:321–331. Google Scholar

30.

R.A Oomen M.W Reudink J.J Nocera C.M Somers M.C Greenand C.J Kyle 2011. Mitochondrial evidence for panmixia despite perceived barriers to gene flow in a widely distributed waterbird. Journal of Heredity 102:584–592. Google Scholar

31.

V.I Perevaand A.V Grazhdankin 1994. Possible effects of anthropogenic environmental changes on morphological variation of some European birds of prey. Pages 667–675 in B.-U Meyburgand R.D Chancellor [Eds.], Raptor conservation today: proceedings of 5th World Conference on Birds of Prey and Owls. World Working Group on Birds of Prey and Owls, Berlin, Germany, and Pica Press, Mountfield, Sussex, U.K. Google Scholar

32.

D Posadaand K.A Crandall 2001. Intraspecific gene genealogies: trees grafting into networks. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16:37–45. Google Scholar

33.

M.D Sorensenand R.C Fleischer 1996. Multiple independent transpositions of mitochondrial DNA control region sequences to the nucleus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A. 93:15239–15243. Google Scholar

34.

D.L Swofford 2001. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony and other methods. Version 4.b10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA U.S.A. Google Scholar

35.

S.L Talbot A.G Palmer G.K Sage S.A Sonsthagen T Swem D.J Brimmand C.M White 2011. Lack of genetic polymorphism among Peregrine Falcons Falco peregrinus of Fiji. Journal of Avian Biology 42:415–428. Google Scholar

36.

H.B Tordoffand P.T Redig 1997. Midwest Peregrine Falcon demography, 1982–95. Journal of Raptor Research 31:339–346. Google Scholar

37.

H.B Tordoffand P.T Redig 2001. Role of genetic background in the success of reintroduced Peregrine Falcons. Conservation Biology 15:528–532. Google Scholar

38.

C.M Whiteand D Boyce 1988. An overview of Peregrine Falcon subspecies. Pages 789–810 in T.J Cade J.H Enderson C.G Thelanderand C.M White [Eds.], Peregrine Falcon populations: their management and recovery. The Peregrine Fund, Inc., Boise, ID U.S.A. Google Scholar

39.

C.M White D.J Brimmand F Clunie 1988. A study of Peregrines in the Fiji Islands, South Pacific Ocean. Pages 275–287 in T.J Cade J.H Enderson C.G Thelanderand C.M White [Eds.], Peregrine Falcon populations: their management and recovery. The Peregrine Fund, Inc., Boise, ID U.S.A. Google Scholar

40.

C.M White N.J Clum T.J Cadeand W.G HUNT 2002. Peregrine Falcon (Falco peregrinus). In A Poole [Ed.], The birds of North America online, No. 660. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY U.S.A.  http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/660 (last accessed 7 July 2013). Google Scholar

41.

C.M White J.R Parrish D.J Brimmand J.L Longmire 1993. Aspects of variation between Peregrine Falcons: a review with emphasis on southern hemisphere populations. Pages 13–24 in P Olsen [Ed.], Australian raptor studies. Royal Australian Ornithologists' Union, Melbourne, Australia. Google Scholar

42.

C.M White S.A Sonsthagen G.K Sage C Andersonand S.L Talbot 2013. Genetic relationships among some subspecies of the Peregrine Falcon (Falco peregrinus L.), inferred from mitochondrial DNA control regions sequences. Auk 130:1–10. Google Scholar

43.

M Wink H Döttlinger M.K Nichollsand H Sauer-Gürth 2000. Phylogenetic relationships between black shaheen Falco peregrinus peregrinator, red-naped shaheen F. pelegrinoides babylonicus and peregrines F. peregrinus. Pages 853–857 in R Chancellorand B.-U Meyburg [Eds.], Raptors at risk: proceedings of 5th World Conference on Birds of Prey and Owls. World Working Group on Birds of Prey and Owls, Berlin, Germany, and Hancock House, Blaine, WA U.S.A. Google Scholar

44.

M Wink H Sauer-Gürth D Ellisand R Kenward 2004. Phylogenetic relationships in the hierofalco complex (saker, gyr-, lanner, laggar falcon). Pages 499–504 in R Chancellorand B.-U Meyburg [Eds.], Raptors worldwide: proceedings of the 6th World Conference on Birds of Prey and Owls. World Working Group on Birds of Prey and Owls, Budapest, Hungary and Berlin, Germany.  Google Scholar
The Raptor Research Foundation, Inc.
Douglas A. Bell "Genetic Evidence for Global Dispersal in the Peregrine Falcon (Falco peregrinus) and Affinity with the Taita Falcon (Falco fasciinucha)," Journal of Raptor Research 48(1), 44-53, (1 March 2014). https://doi.org/10.3356/JRR-12-12.1
Received: 19 February 2012; Accepted: 1 September 2013; Published: 1 March 2014
JOURNAL ARTICLE
10 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top