Open Access
Translator Disclaimer
22 August 2022 The Crimean population of the lesser grey shrike (Lanius minor) has low behavioural flexibility in its response to approaching humans
Peter Mikula, Zbigniew Kwieciński, Ireneusz Kaługa, Piotr Tryjanowski
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The ongoing growth of the human population will increase the rate of wildlife-human interactions. High levels of animal tolerance and flexible responses towards human presence seem to be among the key mechanisms behind successful wildlife-human coexistence, but this behaviour remains unexplored for most populations and species of animals. Here, we investigate the escape behaviour (measured as flight initiation distance) of the Crimean population of a charismatic and declining bird species, the lesser grey shrike (Lanius minor). We examined its relationship with starting distance of the approaching human, directness of that approach (direct or tangential), habitat type (rural or suburban), and height of the perch used by shrikes. We found that the starting distance was significantly associated with escape responses of shrikes to approaching humans. In contrast, we found no significant association between escape responses and directness of approach, habitat type, or height of perch. Our results indicate that the lesser grey shrike may exhibit low flexibility in their escape responses towards humans which may have implications for their conservation management. Our results also indicate that the widely used 30 m threshold for minimum starting distance may be insufficient for rural populations, even of small passerines.

Introduction

The human population and its impact on natural ecosystems are both predicted to further increase during the 21st century (Sanderson et al. 2002). Animals may adaptively respond to changed environmental conditions by cognitive processes adjusting their behaviour (Lima & Dill 1990, Ducatez et al. 2020). Although most wildlife-human interactions are non-lethal and harmless, animals usually perceive humans as predators and respond to them in the same way, including escaping (Frid & Dill 2002). Increased human presence may elevate the frequency of costly escape responses in animals that lack the ability to tolerate human disturbance, with possible cascading effects on individual fitness and population dynamics (Bélanger & Bedard 1990, Steven et al. 2011, Møller et al. 2014, Moss et al. 2014). For example, European and Australian bird species with declining populations are less tolerant of an approaching human than species with increasing populations (Møller et al. 2014). Escape behaviour of animals is affected by several factors, such as the distance at which an approach begins (Blumstein 2003, Tryjanowski et al. 2020, Mikula et al. 2021), body mass and overall pace-of-life strategy (Stankowich & Blumstein 2005, Weston et al. 2012), sex and age (Kalb et al. 2019), flock size (Morelli et al. 2019, Tryjanowski et al. 2020), but also more subtle risk cues, such as human gaze and head orientation (Bateman & Fleming 2011, Clucas et al. 2013), and directness (Møller & Tryjanowski 2014) and speed of approach (Stankowich & Blumstein 2005). Based on their traits, some species are expected to have a decreased ability to cope with human disturbance and the identification of these may help in their conservation management (Samia et al. 2015b). However, the flexibility in behavioural responses towards human presence remains unexplored for many populations and species of animals.

Fig. 1.

Photographs documenting (A) studied species, the lesser grey shrike (Lanius minor), and habitat types differing in the level of anthropogenic disturbance inhabited by this species on the Crimean Peninsula, including (B) rural (Beherove; 45°26′01″ N, 36°14′55″ E; 15 May 2013), and (C) suburban areas (Kercz lighthouse; 45°23′08″ N, 36°38′13″ E; 19 May 2013).

img-z2-2_01.jpg

The lesser grey shrike (Lanius minor) is a charismatic and emblematic species of passerine bird (order: Passeriformes) (Fig. 1A) breeding in large areas from Spain to Central Russia. However, populations of this species have undergone sharp declines in most European countries since the 19th century; the species is currently considered to be extinct in several Western (e.g. Belgium and Germany) and Central (e.g. Czech Republic and Poland) European countries with only isolated populations surviving in others (e.g. Spain and Slovakia) (Bronskov & Keller 2020, Yosef & International Shrike Working Group 2020). This decline has been largely attributed to the abundance declines of its main diet type, i.e. large insects, mainly due to a general intensification of agriculture, including intensive use of insecticides (Bronskov & Keller 2020, BirdLife International 2022). It has been found that diet generalist species have higher technical innovation rates and larger brains, which may indicate lower behavioural flexibility and plasticity in diet-specialist species, such as the lesser grey shrike (Ducatez et al. 2015). At present there is virtually nothing known about the behaviour of these shrikes in the presence of humans (Díaz et al. 2013, Livezey et al. 2016). However, observations from congeneric species indicate that the lesser grey shrike may be sensitive to human disturbance. For example, newly established insular populations of the bull-headed shrike (Lanius bucephalus) had a lower tolerance towards approaching humans than mainland shrikes (Hamao et al. 2021). Breeding pairs of the great grey shrike (Lanius excubitor) disturbed by researchers increased nest height in the following breeding season (Antczak et al. 2005).

Here, we explore the flexibility of escape responses towards approaching humans of lesser grey shrikes inhabiting the Crimean Peninsula. We investigate the influence of starting distance of approaching human, type of approach (direct or tangential), habitat type (rural or suburban), and the height of the perch used by birds.

Material and Methods

Study area and data collection

Escape responses of lesser grey shrikes were collected in the Crimean Peninsula (de jure Ukraine) during May (breeding season) 2013. The study was conducted in the steppe landscape of the Kerch Peninsula, 20 km west of the city of Kerch (45°35′ N, 36°46′ E), covering six sampling sites: Zatyshe (45°22′28″ N, 36°10′01″ E), Chystopillya (45°22′01″ N, 36°10′58″ E), Beherove (45°26′01″ N, 36°14′55″ E), Oktyabrs'ke (45°21′48″ N, 36°21′52″ E), Kerch lighthouse (45°23′08″ N, 36°38′13″ E), and Kerch suburbs (45°17′48″ N, 36°25′19″ E). Many natural hilly parts of the steppe have been preserved in this area. The study location (150 km2) is an extensively used landscape, encompassing agricultural areas, small old orchard patches, and natural grasslands that are often grazed by cattle. Grasslands are typically dominated by feather grass Stipa capillata, S. pennata and S. pulcherrima, furrowed fescue Festuca sulcata and dittany Dictamnus albus. The mosaic of this area is formed by midfield woodlots of different ages, scattered trees and discontinuous linear habitats, mainly consisting of mixed rows of shrubs and single trees, including Crimean pine Pinus pallasiana, Russian olive Elaeagnus angustifolia, false acacia Robinia pseudoacacia, and common hawthorn Crataegus monogyna. There are also seasonal streams, salt pans and mid-field ponds. The Crimean population of these shrikes is still relatively numerous and the population appears stable (Andriushchenko & Vorovka 2022).

The escape responses of shrikes towards approaching humans were estimated by the flight initiation distance, a simple and widely adopted metric used as a proxy for fearfulness and willingness of animals to take a risk (Stankowich & Blumstein 2005, Blumstein 2006, Díaz et al. 2013). It has been shown that risk assessment measured by flight initiation distances is highly consistent for individuals, populations and species tested under similar circumstances (Carrete & Tella 2010, 2013, Díaz et al. 2013, Guay et al. 2016). In brief, all data were collected by a single author (Z. Kwieciński) wearing outdoor clothing (without any bright colours) using a standard procedure previously described (Blumstein 2006, Díaz et al. 2013). When a focal bird was spotted, the researcher moved at a normal walking speed (1 ms–1) either (a) directly towards the bird (n = 190 observations) or (b) tangentially towards the bird (i.e. passing the individual at a distance of 5 m) (n = 48; for a similar approach, see Møller & Tryjanowski 2014). During both approaches, the head and gaze of the researcher was oriented towards the focal bird. The flight initiation distance was then estimated as the distance between the researcher (measured as the number of 1 m long strides) and the focal bird when it initiated escape (usually by flying away). If the bird was positioned above the ground, e.g. perched on vegetation, the flight initiation distance was estimated as the Euclidean distance between the position of the researcher and the focal bird. We examined only adult individuals not accompanied by other con- or heterospecific individuals (i.e. flock size was always one) that showed no initial signs of distress behaviour. We avoided re-sampling the same individual by moving to a different shrike territory after each sampling occasion. All data were collected during favourable weather conditions (i.e. no rain, and no or light wind). In total, we collected 238 flight initiation distance estimates (mean ± SD = 11.75 ± 6.04 m).

For each observation, we also collected data on the starting distance, habitat type, and the height of perch used by shrikes. The starting distance was estimated as the distance (measured as the number of 1 m long strides) to the focal bird when the researcher initiated the approach (mean ± SD = 14.49 ± 8.34 m). Habitat type was recorded as either rural (n = 143 observations; areas with little or no human population and buildings; Fig. 1B) or suburban (n = 95; typically areas on the edges of human settlements; Fig. 1C) following the scheme by Marzluff et al. (2001). Perch height was estimated as the vertical distance (in metres) between the bird and the ground (recorded as zero if the bird was sitting on the ground) (mean ± SD = 3.08 ± 1.29 m). All these factors have previously been found to affect avian responses towards approaching humans; escape distances typically increased with increasing starting distance (Blumstein 2003, Mikula et al. 2018, Tryjanowski et al. 2020), and from suburban to rural habitats (Samia et al. 2015b), but previous studies provided mixed results for the effect of perch height (Blumstein et al. 2004, Bjørvik et al. 2015). Each observation was also dated. Each day we sampled only one locality and each locality was sampled only once. We did not include the sex of birds in our analyses, because it was not possible to reliably identify the sex of birds in the field.

Statistical analyses

All analyses were conducted in R v. 4.1.2 (R Development Core Team 2021). We tested for an association between flight initiation distance (response variable) and starting distance (in metres; log10-transformed), approach type (direct or tangential), habitat type (rural or suburban), and height of perch (in metres) (predictors) using a generalized linear model. The model was run using a Gaussian error distribution and a logarithmic link function for a response variable. We graphically inspected the goodness-of-fit and distribution of the residuals, revealing no major violations of the model assumptions. We calculated adjusted deviance explained by the model using the Dsquared function in modEvA v. 3.5 package (Barbosa et al. 2013). We checked collinearity between predictors using the vif function in car v. 3.0-10 package (Fox et al. 2020), which showed low collinearity between predictors (< 2 in all cases).

Table 1.

Association between flight initiation distance (response variable) and starting distance (in metres; log10-transformed), approach type (direct or tangential), habitat type (rural or suburban), and height of the perch (in metres) (predictors) in the lesser grey shrike (Lanius minor) sampled on the Crimean Peninsula (n = 238 observations). The estimates for categorical variables are provided for one level of each category with respect to the reference level, i.e. tangential with respect to direct approach, and suburban with respect to rural habitat. The model explained 93% of the variation in the data. Boldface indicates statistically significant results.

img-z4-3_01.gif

Because observed patterns could also be affected by sampling date and locality (e.g. due to different weather or microhabitat conditions), we re-ran the same model using locality as a random factor in a generalized linear mixed model using the lmer function in lme4 v. 1.1-27.1 and lmerTest v. 3.1-3 packages (Kuznetsova et al. 2013, Bates et al. 2015). Both models revealed qualitatively similar results, hence we report only results using the simpler generalized linear model.

Fig. 2.

Association between flight initiation distance (response variable) and the starting distance (predictor) (original, untransformed values). Line and shaded area represent the results of univariate robust linear regressions and 95% confidence interval (not controlled for other predictors) fitted using the rlm function in the MASS v. 7.3-55 package (Venables & Ripley 2002).

img-z4-9_01.jpg

Ethical note

Our study was observational and non-invasive. All fieldwork was conducted in accordance with approved guidelines. Data were collected in public places where no special permit was required. Our data collection caused only brief and minimal disturbance to birds which typically did not differ from standard background disturbance caused by other site visitors.

Results

We found that only the starting distance significantly predicted shrike escape responses towards an approaching human (Table 1, Fig. 2). Although initial data exploration suggested that shrikes escaped significantly earlier in rural than suburban areas (ANOVA: F1,236 = 390.2, P < 0.001), this was influenced by significantly longer starting distances in rural than suburban areas (ANOVA: F1,236 = 394.7, P < 0.001). Moreover, we found that shrike escape responses did not differ significantly between direct and tangential approaches. Finally, escape responses of shrikes were not significantly correlated with perch height.

Discussion

We demonstrated that escape distances of a population of lesser grey shrikes on the Crimean Peninsula were significantly correlated only with starting distance; directness of approach, habitat type, and perch height were not significantly correlated with escape response. This finding may indicate that the birds exhibited low flexibility in their response towards approaching humans, which may have implications for the conservation of this species. This outcome is noteworthy because shrikes are considered to be intelligent birds (Syrová et al. 2016) with a relatively large brain size (Sayol et al. 2016); larger-brained species were found to delay escape from predators (Samia et al. 2015a).

If not standardized, the starting distance, i.e. the distance from which an animal was first approached, is one of the strongest predictors of escape distance in birds (Blumstein 2003, Mikula et al. 2018, Tryjanowski et al. 2020). Birds may consider longer approaches as more dangerous or approaches from longer distances may require higher monitoring costs – to avoid such costs, birds may escape early after detection of an approaching threat (Blumstein 2010, Samia et al. 2013). A strong association between starting and escape distance has practical consequences for conservation management practices in this species. The lack of information on the starting distance may result in biased estimates of escape distances (Blumstein et al. 2015); various starting distances should be adopted to correctly estimate the maximum, the mean and the variance of escape distances in order to set up adequate buffer zones to minimize human disturbance (Guay et al. 2016, Livezey et al. 2016). However, our results also indicate that estimating safe buffer zones from maximum escape distances may be problematic in the lesser grey shrike and other species that show no evidence of a plateau in the relationship between escape and starting distances, even if starting distances are long (> 40 m in this small passerine) (Fig. 2). In these cases, rather than setting up excessively large buffer zones that may impede birdwatching and other recreational and research activities, alternative strategies may be adopted such as forming permanent tourist paths and observation hides with larger buffers in sites with particularly sensitive species. Finally, our results indicate that the widely used threshold for minimum starting distance that was argued to mitigate the effect of starting distance on flight initiation distance (30 m; e.g. Díaz et al. 2013) may be insufficient even in small passerines outside urban areas.

Our findings suggest that the lesser grey shrike (at least, the studied Crimean population) exhibited relatively low behavioural flexibility in response to human approaches under various conditions. Our finding may indicate that this species may be increasingly vulnerable to an increase in human activity. Further studies on additional populations of the lesser grey shrike, as well as other species, are required to address the question of whether habitat and diet-specialist species are increasingly vulnerable to human disturbance. Finally, one of the main future challenges is the incorporation of these findings in efficient wildlife protection and management.

Acknowledgements

We have no known conflict of interest to disclose. We would like to thank our Ukrainian and Russian hosts from The Azov-Black Sea Ornithological Station for help in the field. Special thanks to Dr. Yuriy Andriushchenko for agreeing to be our guide on the Kerch Peninsula. We would also like to thank Tim Sparks for English language correction.

Author Contributions

P. Tryjanowski conceived the idea, Z. Kwieciński collected data in the field with assistance from I. Kaługa, P. Mikula analysed the data and wrote the manuscript with help from P. Tryjanowski and Z. Kwieciński. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available in the FigShare Digital Repository:  https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.20364216.v1.

Literature

1.

Andriushchenko Y. & Vorovka V. 2022: The ornithological zoning of the Azov-Black sea dry steppe enclave of Europe. Ekológia (Bratislava) 41: 78–89. Google Scholar

2.

Antczak M., Hromada M. & Tryjanowski P. 2005: Research activity induces change in nest position of the great grey shrike Lanius excubitor. Ornis Fenn . 82: 20–25. Google Scholar

3.

Barbosa M.A., Real R., Muñoz A.R. & Brown J.A. 2013: New measures for assessing model equilibrium and prediction mismatch in species distribution models. Divers. Distrib. 19: 1333–1338. Google Scholar

4.

Bateman P.W. & Fleming P.A. 2011: Who are you looking at? Hadeda ibises use direction of gaze, head orientation and approach speed in their risk assessment of a potential predator. J. Zool. 285: 316–323. Google Scholar

5.

Bates D., Mächler M., Bolker B. & Walker S. 2015: Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat.Softw. 67: 1–48. Google Scholar

6.

Bélanger L. & Bedard J. 1990: Energetic cost of man-induced disturbance to staging snow geese. J. Wildl. Manag. 54: 36–41. Google Scholar

7.

BirdLife International 2022: Lesser grey shrike (Lanius minor) – birdLife species factsheet. Downloaded on 8 June 2022.  http://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/lesser-grey-shrike-lanius-minor/text Google Scholar

8.

Bjørvik L.M., Dale S., Hermansen G.H. et al. 2015: Bird flight initiation distances in relation to distance from human settlements in a Tanzanian floodplain habitat. J. Ornithol. 156: 239–246. Google Scholar

9.

Blumstein D.T. 2003: Flight-initiation distance in birds is dependent on intruder starting distance. J. Wildl. Manag. 67: 852–857. Google Scholar

10.

Blumstein D.T. 2006: Developing an evolutionary ecology of fear: how life history and natural history traits affect disturbance tolerance in birds. Anim. Behav. 71: 389–399. Google Scholar

11.

Blumstein D.T. 2010: Flush early and avoid the rush: a general rule of antipredator behavior? Behav. Ecol. 21: 440–442. Google Scholar

12.

Blumstein D.T., Fernández-Juricic E., LeDee O. et al. 2004: Avian risk assessment: effects of perching height and detectability. Ethology 110: 273–285. Google Scholar

13.

Blumstein D.T., Samia D.S.M., Stankowich T. & Cooper W.E. 2015: Best practice for the study of escape behavior. In: Cooper W.E. & Blumstein D.T. (eds.), Escaping from predators: an integrative view of escape decisions. Cambridge University Press , Cambridge, UK : 407–419. Google Scholar

14.

Bronskov O. & Keller V. 2020: Lanius minor lesser grey shrike. In: Keller V., Herrando S., Voříšek P. et al. (eds.), European breeding bird atlas 2: distribution, abundance and change. European Bird Census Council & Lynx Edicions , Barcelona, Spain : 536–537. Google Scholar

15.

Carrete M. & Tella J.L. 2010: Individual consistency in flight initiation distances in burrowing owls: a new hypothesis on disturbance-induced habitat selection. Biol. Lett. 23: 167–170. Google Scholar

16.

Carrete M. & Tella J.L. 2013: High individual consistency in fear of humans throughout the adult lifespan of rural and urban burrowing owls. Sci. Rep. 3: 1–7. Google Scholar

17.

Clucas B., Marzluff J.M., Mackovjak D. & Palmquist I. 2013: Do American crows pay attention to human gaze and facial expressions? Ethology 119: 296–302. Google Scholar

18.

Díaz M., Møller A.P., Flensted-Jensen E. et al. 2013: The geography of fear: a latitudinal gradient in anti-predator escape distances of birds across Europe. PLOS ONE 8: e64634. Google Scholar

19.

Ducatez S., Clavel J. & Lefebvre L. 2015: Ecological generalism and behavioural innovation in birds: technical intelligence or the simple incorporation of new foods? J. Anim. Ecol. 84: 79–89. Google Scholar

20.

Ducatez S., Sol D., Sayol F. & Lefebvre L. 2020: Behavioural plasticity is associated with reduced extinction risk in birds. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4: 788–793. Google Scholar

21.

Fox J., Weisberg S., Price B. et al. 2020: Package “car.”  http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/car/car.pdf Google Scholar

22.

Frid A. & Dill L. 2002: Human-caused disturbance stimuli as a form of predation risk. Conserv. Ecol. 6: 11. Google Scholar

23.

Guay P.J., van Dongen W.F.D., Robinson R.W. et al. 2016: AvianBuffer: an interactive tool for characterising and managing wildlife fear responses. Ambio 45: 841–851. Google Scholar

24.

Hamao S., Torikai H., Yoshikawa M. et al. 2021: Risk-taking behavior of bull-headed shrikes that recently colonized islands. Curr. Zool. 67: 177–182. Google Scholar

25.

Kalb N., Anger F. & Randler C. 2019: Flight initiation distance and escape behavior in the black redstart (Phoenicurus ochruros). Ethology 125: 430–438. Google Scholar

26.

Kuznetsova A., Brockhoff P.B. & Christensen R.H.B. 2013: LmerTest: tests for random and fixed effects for linear mixed effect models. R package, version 3.1-2.  http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lmerTest/index.html Google Scholar

27.

Lima S.L. & Dill L.M. 1990: Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can. J. Zool. 68: 619–640. Google Scholar

28.

Livezey K.B., Fernández-Juricic E. & Blumstein D.T. 2016: Database of bird flight initiation distances to assist in estimating effects from human disturbance and delineating buffer areas. J. Fish Wildl. Manag. 7: 181–191. Google Scholar

29.

Marzluff J.M., Bowman R. & Donnelly R. 2001: A historical perspective on urban bird research: trend, terms, and approaches. In: Marzluff J.M., Bowman R. & Donnelly R. (eds.), Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer , New York, USA : 20–47. Google Scholar

30.

Mikula P., Díaz M., Albrecht T. et al. 2018: Adjusting risk-taking to the annual cycle of long-distance migratory birds. Sci. Rep. 8: 13989. Google Scholar

31.

Mikula P., Jokimäki J., Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki M.L. et al. 2021: Face mask-wear did not affect large-scale patterns in escape and alertness of urban and rural birds during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sci. Total Environ. 793: 148672. Google Scholar

32.

Morelli F., Benedetti Y., Díaz M. et al. 2019: Contagious fear: escape behavior increases with flock size in European gregarious birds. Ecol. Evol. 9: 6096–6104. Google Scholar

33.

Moss R., Leckie F., Biggins A. et al. 2014: Impacts of human disturbance on capercaillie Tetrao urogallus distribution and demography in Scottish woodland. Wildl. Biol. 20: 1–18. Google Scholar

34.

Møller A.P., Samia D.S.M., Weston M.A. et al. 2014: American exceptionalism: population trends and flight initiation distances in birds from three continents. PLOS ONE 9: e107883. Google Scholar

35.

Møller A.P. & Tryjanowski P. 2014: Direction of approach by predators and flight initiation distance of urban and rural populations of birds. Behav. Ecol. 25: 960–966. Google Scholar

36.

R Development Core Team 2021: R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing , Vienna, Austria . Google Scholar

37.

Samia D.S.M., Møller A.P. & Blumstein D.T. 2015a: Brain size as a driver of avian escape strategy. Sci. Rep. 5: 11913. Google Scholar

38.

Samia D.S.M., Nakagawa S., Nomura F. et al. 2015b: Increased tolerance to humans among disturbed wildlife. Nat. Commun. 6: 8877. Google Scholar

39.

Samia D.S.M., Nomura F. & Blumstein D.T. 2013: Do animals generally flush early and avoid the rush? A meta-analysis. Biol. Lett. 9: 20130016. Google Scholar

40.

Sanderson E.W., Jaiteh M., Levy M.A. et al. 2002: The human footprint and the last of the wild: the human footprint is a global map of human influence on the land surface, which suggests that human beings are stewards of nature, whether we like it or not. BioScience 52: 891–904. Google Scholar

41.

Sayol F., Maspons J., Lapiedra O. et al. 2016: Environmental variation and the evolution of large brains in birds. Nat. Commun. 7: 13971. Google Scholar

42.

Stankowich T. & Blumstein D.T. 2005: Fear in animals: a meta-analysis and review of risk assessment. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 272: 2627–2634. Google Scholar

43.

Steven R., Pickering C. & Guy Castley J. 2011: A review of the impacts of nature based recreation on birds. J. Environ. Manage. 92: 2287–2294. Google Scholar

44.

Syrová M., Němec M., Veselý P. et al. 2016: Facing a clever predator demands clever responses – red-backed shrikes (Lanius collurio) vs. Eurasian magpies (Pica pica). PLOS ONE 11: e0159432. Google Scholar

45.

Tryjanowski P., Kosicki J.Z., Hromada M. & Mikula P. 2020: The emergence of tolerance of human disturbance in Neotropical birds. J. Trop. Ecol. 36: 1–5. Google Scholar

46.

Venables W.N. & Ripley B.D. 2002: Modern applied statistics with S, 4th ed. Springer , New York, USA . Google Scholar

47.

Weston M.A., McLeod E.M., Blumstein D.T. & Guay P.-J. 2012: A review of flight-initiation distances and their application to managing disturbance to Australian birds. Emu 112: 269–286. Google Scholar

48.

Yosef R. & International Shrike Working Group 2020: Lesser gray shrike (Lanius minor), version 1.0. In: del Hoyo J., Elliott A., Sargatal J. et al. (eds.), Birds of the world. Cornell Lab of Ornithology , Ithaca, USA . Google Scholar
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited.
Peter Mikula, Zbigniew Kwieciński, Ireneusz Kaługa, and Piotr Tryjanowski "The Crimean population of the lesser grey shrike (Lanius minor) has low behavioural flexibility in its response to approaching humans," Journal of Vertebrate Biology 71(22038), 22038.1-7, (22 August 2022). https://doi.org/10.25225/jvb.22038
Received: 26 June 2022; Accepted: 24 July 2022; Published: 22 August 2022
JOURNAL ARTICLE
7 PAGES


Share
SHARE
KEYWORDS
antipredator behaviour
charismatic species
escape distance
species conservation
urbanisation
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top