Translator Disclaimer
1 August 2011 Commercial Extraction of Picrorhiza kurrooa Royle ex Benth. in the Western Himalaya
Anjali Uniyal, Sanjay Kr. Uniyal, Gopal S. Rawat
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Indiscriminate extraction of Picrorhiza kurrooa is a serious threat to the population of this Himalayan medicinal plant. Over 90% of the market demand for this species is met from the wild. We conducted a study on the patterns and processes of kutki extraction in a part of the Dhauladhar range, Western Himalaya, in the state of Himachal Pradesh (India). Semistructured interviews and participant observations with the medicinal plant collectors (n  =  85) were used to assess current trends of medicinal plant extraction. It was revealed that the collectors camp at altitudes > 3500 m and collect medicinal plants over a period of 5 months. Individually they collect 5.2 ± 0.37 kg (fresh weight) of kutki/day. To get 1 kg dry weight of the plant, as many as 300–400 individual plants are uprooted. Further, the initial processing of the material is done in the wild; ca. 1 MT of fuelwood, comprising sensitive tree line species, is burnt to dry the same amount of collected material. This is a threat not only to the survival of the plant itself, but also to that of the sensitive tree line species. The study reveals that the extraction of kutki is unselective and unmanaged, which may be a threat for its regeneration and survival. We recommend spatiotemporal regulation of kutki extraction so as to ensure its conservation. The integrated approach of taking into confidence the local people in the present study has helped in generating a reliable picture of the patterns and processes of kutki extraction. The same may be replicated in other mountain areas for other heavily extracted species.

Introduction and trade value

Picrorhiza kurrooa (family Scrophulariaceae; trade name kutki), a perennial herb confined to alpine zones of the Himalaya, is in very high demand in the herbal market (Dutt 1928; Ved and Goraya 2008). The roots and rhizomes of P. kurrooa contain picrosides of great therapeutic importance (CSIR 1950–1969). In addition to use as liver and stomach medicines, they are also used in drugs prescribed for treatment of respiratory and allergic diseases (Sarin 2008). Consequently, the species is one of the top 15 plant species traded in India in terms of the economic value of traded materials (Malaisamy and Ravindran 2003; Ved and Goraya 2008). With an annual growth rate of 20% in herbal medicines in recent years, demand for medicinal plants has increased by 11.1% (Subrat 2002).

Global estimates of the kutki trade (Olsen and Helles 1997; Olsen 1998; Larsen 2002) suggest that the price of this species is higher than for most products from lower altitudes. The annual supply of kutki from Nepal, India, and Bhutan has been estimated as 375 MT (Olsen 2001). The legal annual collection of kutki from Nepal has been reported as 25 MT (Malla et al 1995) and for India as 50–300 MT (Olsen 2005). However, the kutki supplied from Nepal and Bhutan is Neopicrorhiza scrophulariflora, while more than 90% of the species collected and traded as “kutki” in India is P. kurrooa (Sarin 2008).

Recently the consumption of kutki in different sectors in India has been estimated as 415 MT/year (Ved and Goraya 2008). In 1980, 1.468 MT of P. kurrooa was extracted from Himachal Pradesh (HP); this figure was 10 times higher in 1990 (Sharma 1995). As much as 9.06 MT of P. kurrooa was extracted from the alpine ranges of Chhota Bhangal alone from 1995 to 2000 (Uniyal et al 2006). Similar patterns have also been reported from the Gori Valley of western Himalaya, where more than 5 MT of P. kurrooa was extracted by 12 villages in 2001 (Virdi 2004). According to one estimate, up to 6 MT of P. kurrooa is extracted annually from Sikkim, a small Indian state in the eastern Himalaya (Rai et al 2000). The extraction figures, however, give only some indication of demand, as most of the trade in medicinal plants is illegal and secretive. Ever-increasing market demand, together with overexploitation of the species, has led to concerns being raised about its declining status in the wild (Samant et al 2001; Rai and Sharma 2002; Uniyal et al 2002; Olsen and Larsen 2003).

Consequently, P. kurrooa is included in the Negative List of Export (GOI), Appendix II of Cities, Red Data Book of Indian Plants and Prioritized List of Medicinal Plants for Conservation (Nayar and Sastry 1987–1990; Sajwan and Kala 2007). Although it is heavily extracted from the entire Himalayan range, detailed information on extraction patterns is lacking, while the need for such information has been emphasized (Olsen and Larsen 2003). The present study was therefore conducted to quantify patterns and processes of kutki collection and to document its vulnerability.

Distribution and study area

Picrorhiza, an alpine herb usually found above 3500 m, is distributed mainly throughout the west and northwest Himalaya (Polunin and Stainton 1984). It has also been reported from some parts of the central and northeast Himalaya (Haridasan et al 2002; Rai and Sharma 2002). The present study was carried out in the alpine zones of the Dhauladhar Wildlife Sanctuary (DWLS), HP, a typical habitat of kutki. The study area (32°01′42″ to 32°27′27″N and 76°41′41″ to 77°01′42″E) covers 944 km2 (Figure 1) and is drained by the Ravi and Uhl rivers and their tributaries. The major mountain range, the Dhauladhar, runs from east to west. The DWLS is located at the conjunction of the western, northwestern, and trans-Himalayan biogeographic zones where rich assemblages of flora and fauna are found.

Figure 1

Map of the Dhauladhar Wildlife Sanctuary (Himachal Pradesh), showing location of campsites. (Map by Dr Anjali Uniyal)

i0276-4741-31-3-201-f01.tif

Forty villages lie in and around the DWLS (Gupta 2004), of which 40% are involved in the collection of medicinal plants, whereas collection is negligible in the remaining 24 villages. Before the 1970s, agro-pastoralism was the main occupation of the villagers, whereas medicinal plant collection that provides the villagers hard cash in a short time has now become an important activity. Recently there have been reports of heavy extraction of kutki from the DWLS (Uniyal et al 2006).

Field and research methods

Field surveys were conducted in the DWLS from April 2007 to August 2010. This involved reconnaissance surveys of the villages and interactions with the village headman and the people at large, so as to build confidence with them. Open-ended questionnaires were used to gather information on their socio-economy and seasonal activities (Clarke 1986). The year 2007 was totally dedicated to this purpose. Analysis of the information collated revealed that 40% (n  =  16 villages) of the villages were involved in the collection of medicinal plants. Of the 16 villages, 9 located away from road head and close to alpine areas were rated as heavy collectors and 7 as moderate collectors. Door-to-door interviews of the 9 villages revealed that 75% of the households were involved in kutki collection.

A total of 85 collectors were identified at the camping sites using snowball sampling (Goodman 1961). They were subjected to semistructured open-ended interviews. Five of these collectors were accompanied during their collection trips (Clarke 1986). Information was recorded on their strategies for collection, species collected, days spent in field, daily routine, quantity collected, method of extraction, fresh and dry weight of the species collected, processing in the field, and selling price(s). Fuelwood burned to dry kutki was quantified using a dial balance. Indirect observations such as hardships faced by collectors, their diet, and the resources used during their stay were also recorded.

For estimation of moisture content, the fresh weight of rhizomes and roots was recorded by drawing random samples from the material collected by the extractors. The fresh weight of kutki was recorded in the field using a digital balance, and the samples were later oven dried (50°C) until constant weight was achieved (Mishra 1968). This was then compared with other medicinal species in the area. Five local contractors (villagers who act as middlemen between the collectors and wholesale markets) were informally interviewed to generate information on the local market rate of kutki, while published information was used for the wholesale market rate (Gupta et al 1998: Samant et al 2007: Ved and Goraya 2008). Rapid vulnerability assessment as proposed by Cunningham (1996) and standardized by Wild and Mutebi (1996) was also carried out for P. kurrooa based on the analyses of present study and published information.

Results

Collectors

All 85 respondents revealed that medicinal plant collection was for their own use (99%) until the 1970s but is now primarily for commercial purposes (97.5%), with only a small fraction of medicinal plants (2.5%) collected for collectors' own use. Species and quantity collected depend on market demand. Collectors also reported a steady increase in the demand for kutki in the last 2 decades, while demand for other medicinal species such as Aconitum heterophyllum, Jurinea macrocephala, and Dactylorhiza hatagirea has varied from year to year. None of these plants were extracted by the collectors for commercial purposes in the last 5–6 years. However, owing to increased demand and a rise in the price of kutki (Samant et al 2007; Ved and Goraya 2008) in the last 2 decades, the number of Picrorhiza collectors has increased fourfold.

Although extraction of medicinal plants is legally prohibited from wildlife sanctuaries, the government of HP has not been able to settle the issue of the traditional rights of local people in the DWLS. Hence extraction of medicinal plants continues in this sanctuary. The collection sites of Picrorhiza lie in the interior areas of the DWLS (red dots in Figure 1). The increasing number of collectors and diminishing availability of the species is forcing individuals to collect farther away. For instance, villagers from Chhota Bhanghal cross various glaciers and passes to reach Bara Bhanghal and secretly collect Picrorhiza.

Camping

Based on the information recorded from collectors and personal observations, it was found that a minimum of 8 collectors had camped in Nagrota and a maximum of 40 collectors had camped in Umlakudo to extract Picrorhiza. With 8 such areas (yellow dots in Figure 1) being occupied by the extractors, the number of collectors totaled 185, and the mean number of collectors per area was 23.13 ± 12.43.

Of the 85 collectors interviewed, 95.29% (n  =  81) were dedicated and 4.71% (n  =  4) were opportunistic. Dedicated collectors are those who camp and collect medicinal plants for a longer duration (up to 3 weeks) in very remote areas and focus on collection of a single species, while opportunistic collectors combine this with other activities such as livestock grazing and fuelwood collection (Olsen 1998) and may include collection of multiple species. Women were generally opportunistic collectors in the study area. The collectors reported many serious injuries, including the death of 1 person in 2009 during Picrorhiza collection on steep slopes.

The collectors' camping sites, generally above 3600 m, are located at a day's distance from the village. Here collectors either camp in the rocky caves or set up temporary tents near water channels (Figure 2). Two to 3 people stay together so that they can maximize the use of resources. The peak kutki collection period is from mid-June to September, when collected material is regularly ferried to the villages. Interactions and observations revealed that 1 trip took 2 weeks (mean days /trip 14.7 ± 2.62, n  =  85), and collectors carried 15 kg of wheat flour and 3–4 kg of pulses on each trip.

Figure 2

Collectors' camp under rocks: note the living space and sun drying of kutki on rocks. (Photo by Dr Anjali Uniyal)

i0276-4741-31-3-201-f02.tif

Collection routine

Kutki extraction begins a day after the collectors reach the camp sites. A daily routine clock (Figure 3) prepared on the basis of their activities revealed that they spent 10 ± 0.5 hours each day on extraction. They take along a snack of 2 wheat flour chapatis and salt to collection sites and take a break of 15–30 minutes. It was revealed that most kutki around camp sites has been depleted, and hence the collectors take at least 1–2 hours to reach the collection sites. Although 2–3 collectors stay together in a camp, they spread out during collection to avoid competition. The entire plant is dug up and kept in gunny sacks. Plants of all sizes and age classes are collected. On average, each person collected 5.2 ± 0.37 kg (fresh weight) kutki/day (based on n  =  5, quantitative estimates on-site during collection, using a balance; n  =  80, people interviewed and estimates based on the raw material in sacks). Based on moisture content and dry weight estimates, it was found that approximately 300 individual plants (flowering shoots) are needed to make 1 kg dry weight of Picrorhiza.

Figure 3

The collectors' daily routine starts early in the morning and continues till late in the night. (Source: own data)

i0276-4741-31-3-201-f03.tif

With energy input of 1.96 MJ/man-hour (Gopalan et al 1980), the collectors spent around 19.6 MJ of energy only for collection and an extra 3.92 MJ for other daily work, resulting in a total of 23.52 MJ for 12 hours. Their energy intake included 1 kg of wheat flour/day (14.7 MJ/kg), 200 g of pulses/day (14.7 MJ/kg), and some sugar (5.3 MJ/kg) in tea, amounting to 17.86 MJ/day. Thus kutki collectors have to expend greater energy during their stay in alpine areas than in their villages (energy input: 20.19 MJ/day/person; energy expenditure: 23.52 MJ/day/person). The practice, therefore, appears to be energy demanding and strenuous.

Processing

The first step in processing kutki is to spread the collected material for sun drying. It is subsequently manually cleaned of leaves, mud, and other unwanted material. This process takes 1–2 hours for a day's collection and damages the collectors' hands. When the fresh weight collected reaches approximately 80 kg, the material is dried in hearths (Figure 4). Initially, the flame is kept high to reduce the moisture content of rhizomes rapidly without burning the material, and then the flame is adjusted to low. Hearth drying of 70–80 kg fresh material takes 10–12 hours during the rainy season. Proper drying is a critical process, because traders offer better prices for clean and dried material. On completion of drying, the weight of fresh material is reduced by half. Around 70–80 kg of fuelwood is burned in the process. The major species used for fuelwood are Juniperus indica, Rhododendron campanulatum, and Betula utilis. The distance traveled to collect fuelwood varies from 1.5 to 2.5 km. This requires 4–8 hours per week. Thus, in addition to collection, processing of raw material is also a backbreaking task.

Figure 4

Drying of kutki in hearths, using local fuelwood. (Photo by Dr Sanjay Kr. Uniyal)

i0276-4741-31-3-201-f04.tif

Trade

Once the material is completely dry, it is packed in gunny sacks and brought to the road heads on the backs of the collectors. Collectors stay in their villages for 3–6 days and then return to the camp sites. Two to 6 such cycles of collection are carried out each season, leading to a total collection of 80 kg to 2.5 quintals of Picrorhiza/season. Depending on the quantity of material extracted, the annual income/household ranges from Rs. 24,000 to 120,000 (Rs. 48 =  US$ 1). On average this amounts to Rs. 67,050 ± 32,171 per household. Material collected in the months of July and August is supposed to have high moisture content and is generally rated low, while material collected in September is rated high because of low moisture content. Sometimes variation in the ratings also depends on competition among local contractors.

During the period 2007–2010, the price for Picrorhiza at the village level varied from Rs. 220 to 340/kg. Local contractors collect the material from extractors when the quantity is more than 8 quintals. A contractor generally markets 8–40 quintals of Picrorhiza/season from the area. Contractors market the raw material to the nearest wholesale markets at Amritsar and Delhi for a commission of Rs. 10/kg. The price increases as it enters the market away from the collection site. The Amritsar mandi (market) acts as an intermediate mandi for many Himalayan species, including Picrorhiza (Ved and Goraya 2008). The price of Picrorhiza in different mandis varies significantly. Prices in Amritsar for 2005–2006 were reported as Rs. 200–250/kg, whereas the price was greater (Rs. 260–300/kg) in Thrissur, which is far away.

Conservation status of P. kurrooa: rapid vulnerability assessment

Recognizing the ecological and trade value of Picrorhiza, and considering the observations of the present study, rapid vulnerability assessment (RVA) was carried out for Picrorhiza (Table 1). RVA integrates both indigenous and scientific knowledge available about a resource species. It takes into account different aspects of ecology, socio-economy, and economics to facilitate a quick and broad assessment of sustainability based on scores assigned. The score of the RVA was 30 for Picrorhiza, which is on the higher side of the RVA index, indicating a high degree of vulnerability. Thus, immediate and intensive efforts are needed for its conservation.

Table 1

Rapid vulnerability assessment for P. kurrooa.

i0276-4741-31-3-201-t01.tif

Discussion

Extraction of non-timber forest produce affects ecological processes at multiple scales (Ticktin 2004). Its impacts depend on the plant part collected, the method of collection, the quantity collected, and the ecosystem where the extraction takes place. In the DWLS, extraction of Picrorhiza has become an important income-generating activity. Although other species such as A. heterophyllum, J. macrocephala, D. hatagirea, and Rheum australe sharing the same ecological zones also have high medicinal value, Picrorhiza is preferred for extraction. The primary reason for this is high and steady market demand as well as relatively low moisture content (63.1%), resulting in collection of 3–5 kg/day as compared to Aconitum (0.5–1 kg/day, moisture content: 68.91%) and Dactylorhiza (0.1–0.2 kg/day, moisture content: 83.44%).

Considering that large-scale extraction from the wild is less selective and unregulated, its affects on the population of a species are far more severe (Ticktin 2004). In the present study, it was also observed that extraction of kutki is unselective and unmanaged. The plant is heavily uprooted irrespective of its age and class. Repeated collection, irrespective of age and class, affects the size of the plant part collected. As a consequence of frequent collection, smaller root sizes and dwarfing have been reported in a few species (Larsen 2002; Law and Salick 2005). The same also holds true for Picrorhiza. Collectors have reported that the length and size of Picrorhiza rhizomes have diminished in recent years, and so has regeneration.

Regeneration of Picrorhiza takes place through both the seeds and the rhizomes (Table 1). Seed germination is low, and since most extraction takes place prior to seed set, the sole path to regeneration is through rhizomes (Ghimiri et al 2005). Picrorhiza, owing to its long underground rhizomes, has greater chances of survival compared to its associates such as Aconitum and Dactylorhiza because of its “guerilla strategy” (Lovett Doust 1981). However, recovery is difficult even for such rhizomatous species if harvest levels exceed 50% (Ghimiri et al 2005).

It has been reported that 200–300 plants are harvested as shoot parts and 500–600 as root parts to make 1 kg dry weight of Picrorhiza (Rai et al 2000; Uniyal et al 2009). If total extraction as reported from India is 415 MT, the number of plants extracted increases many fold, which would certainly influence plant population. The high RVA scores for kutki in the present study also point to this (Table 1). Though temporal data on its availability and regeneration in the wild are meager, collectors report that the species is now restricted to steeper and less accessible areas. It was also observed during our surveys that though Picrorhiza habitats are widely distributed in the study area, population of Picrorhiza was low in sites close to collectors' camps (2.5 ± 0.56/m2, location: 32°08′41.1″N and 76°54′12.3″E, Altitude: 3581 m) and high in areas where collection was negligible (33.33 ± 6.54/m2, location: 32°08′55.9″N and 76°53′41.2″E, altitude: 3634 m). Thus, it seems that the time is not far off when the species will be locally extinct. Such trends have been observed in the Chhangu and Lachung valleys of Sikkim, where widespread collection of Podophyllum hexandrum and Panax pseudoginseng has now made these areas devoid of both these herbs (Rai and Sharma 2002).

An ecologically sensitive issue associated with Picrorhiza extraction is the demand for fuelwood to process the collected material (Figure 4). With 70–80 kg of fuelwood burned to dry 70–80 kg of Picrorhiza, the total quantity of fuelwood burned/collector/season is between 2 and 5 quintals. As the collectors camp above 3500 m, most of the demand for fuelwood is met from the alpine scrub community, which is an important habitat for various threatened fauna such as the Himalayan musk deer (Green 1987). Thus, fuelwood extraction not only affects the status of tree line species but also the survival of threatened wild fauna.

Another important aspect of medicinal plant extraction is associated with the collectors. In the collection of medicinal plants, collectors' gross and net margins are supposed to be almost similar, as products are freely available and the activity does not require any capital investment (Larsen and Olsen 2007). However, considering the complexities in trade and transaction at different levels (Ved and Goraya 2008), variations in margins are substantial. It has been reported that net margins for Picrorhiza collectors in Nepal average 46.6% of the Delhi wholesale price (Olsen 1998), while for interior areas of HP, the net share of collector is assumed to be 28% in consumer rupees (Negi and Bhalla 2002). In the present study as well, the economic benefits for kutki collectors appear to be high when compared to other activities in villages, but after taking into consideration the labor and energy and the hardships involved, the cost of this practice increases manifold. Moreover, margins are low in comparison to those of contractors, who sell medicinal plants for a much higher rate in the wholesale market than they pay to the collectors. It is said that the contractors have to deal with more risks and hence should have greater economic benefits (Olsen and Helles 1997), but the risks involved for collectors are no less. The former have to deal with risks involved in marketing of the raw material via roads, while the latter have risks pertaining to natural calamities and hardships during their camping and collection. It is quite apparent that medicinal plant extraction contributes significantly toward the total cash income of collectors in many parts of Himalaya (Samant et al 2007; Winkler 2008; Weckerle et al 2010). However; collection takes an unmanaged and unregulated form in fulfilling market demands.

Hence, the main focus in conserving Picrorhiza should be on mitigation of extraction pressure. Sometimes conservationists have no choice but to devise sustainable harvest techniques for wild populations (Sheldon et al 1998). Developing good collection practices should be a step in this direction (Medicinal Plants Specialist Group 2007; Singh et al 2011). Market demand for various species should be monitored, and supply of these species should be spatiotemporally regulated. Another option considered suitable for the conservation of Picrorhiza is promotion of its large-scale cultivation. High ranking of P. kurrooa for ex situ propagation (Badola 2002) justifies its cultivation.

Despite the importance of ex situ conservation, in situ conservation is always essential to maintain the genetic and intraspecific diversity of a plant (Bhattacharya and Sharma 2010). Keeping in mind the targets of the Global Plant Conservation Strategy of the CBD for 2010 (Schippman et al 2002), under which no species of wild flora should be subject to unsustainable exploitation because of international trade, conservation of Picrorhiza is of paramount importance.

Conclusions

The present study concludes that extraction of Picrorhiza has become an important economic activity in the DWLS. Presently, extraction is unselective and unmanaged, thereby posing a serious threat to the plant's status in the wild. Moreover, processing of the collected material in the field is an indirect threat to the sensitive tree line. Spatiotemporal regulation of this practice is essential to conserve the species and the ecosystem. It is also emphasized that for studies of such sensitive issues, an integrated approach that is primarily driven by confidence building with local people is a must.

Open access article: please credit the authors and the full source.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the support and encouragement provided by the Director of WII & IHBT. A.U. thanks the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India, for financial support under the Women Scientist Scheme, SR/WOS-A/LS-72/2007. The State Forest Department, Government of HP, is thanked for the facilities and logistic support. Most importantly, we are thankful to the villagers who allowed us to be in their company and provided the information with generosity. Thanks are due to Dr. Gautam Talukdar and Dr. Amit Kumar for helping with the map. We would also like to thank the Dr A. B. Zimmermann and 2 anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions and guidance.

REFERENCES

1.

H. K. Badola 2002. Endangered medicinal plant species in Himachal Pradesh. Current Science 83:797–798. Google Scholar

2.

N. Bhattacharya and S. Sarma . 2010. Assessment of availability, ecological features and habitat preference of the medicinal herb Houttuynia cordata Thumb. in the Brahmaputra valley of Assam, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 160:277–287. Google Scholar

3.

R. Clarke 1986. The Handbook of Ecological Monitoring. GEMS/UNEP publication. Oxford, United Kingdom Oxford University Press. Google Scholar

4.

CSIR [Council of Scientific and Industrial Research] 1950–1969. Wealth of India. 11 volumes. New Delhi, India CSIR. Google Scholar

5.

A. B. Cunningham 1996. People, Park and Plant Use: Recommendations for Multiple-Use Zones and Development Alternatives around Bwindi-Impenerrabie National Park, Uganda. People and Plants Working Paper 4. Paris, France UNESCO [United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization]. Google Scholar

6.

N. P. Dutt 1928. Commercial Drugs of India. Calcutta, India Thacker Spink. Google Scholar

7.

S. K. Ghimiri, D. McKey, and Y. A. Thomas . 2005. Conservation of Himalayan medicinal plants. Harvesting patterns and ecology of two threatened species, Nardostachys grandiflora DC. and Neopicrorhiza scrophulariiflora (Pennell) Hong. Biological Conservation 124:463–475. Google Scholar

8.

L. A. Goodman 1961. Snowball sampling. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 32 (1):148–170. Google Scholar

9.

C. Gopalan, B. V. Rama Sastri, and S. C. Balasubramanian . 1980. Nutritive Value of Indian Foods. Hyderabad, India ICMR [National Institute of Nutrition]. Google Scholar

10.

M. J. B. Green 1987. Ecological separation in Himalayan ungulates. Series B. Journal of Zoology 1:693–719. Google Scholar

11.

A. K. Gupta, S. K. Vats, and Brij Lal . 1998. How cheap can be a medicinal plant species? Current Science 74:565–566. Google Scholar

12.

K. K. Gupta 2004. Draft Management Plan of Dhauladhar Wildlife Sanctuary (2004–2014). Palampur, India Available from corresponding author of this article. Google Scholar

13.

K. Haridasan, G. P. Shukla, and M. L. Deori . 2002. Cultivation prospects of medicinal plants of Arunachal Pradesh. A review. In: S. S. Samant, U. Dhar, and L. M. S. Palni . editors. Himalayan Medicinal Plants. Potential and Prospects. Almora, India Gyanodaya Prakashan, Nainital. pp. 329–344. Google Scholar

14.

H. O. Larsen 2002. Commercial medicinal plant extraction in the hills of Nepal: Local management systems and ecological sustainability. Environmental Management 29 (1):88–101. Google Scholar

15.

H. O. Larsen and C. S. Olsen . 2007. Unsustainable collection and unfair trade? Uncovering and assessing assumptions regarding Central Himalayan medicinal plant conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation 16:1679–1697. Google Scholar

16.

W. Law and J. Salick . 2005. Human induced dwarfing of Himalayan snow lotus, Saussurea laniceps (Asteraceae). PNAS [Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences] 102 (29):10218–10219. Google Scholar

17.

L. Lovett Doust 1981. Population dynamics and local specialization in a clonal perennial (Ranunculus repens). I. The dynamics of ramets in contrasting habitats. Journal of Ecology 69:743–755. Google Scholar

18.

A. Malaisamy and C. Ravindran . 2003. Medicinal plants: Where do we stand globally? Science Tech Entrepreneur Magazine 2 (5):42–49. Google Scholar

19.

S. B. Malla, B. P. R. Shakya, K. R. Rajbhandari, N. K. Bhattarai, and N. N. Subedi . 1995. Minor Forest Products of Nepal. General Status and Trade. FRIS Project Paper 4. Kathmandu, Nepal Forest Resource Information System Project. Google Scholar

20.

MPSG [Medicinal Plants Specialist Group] 2007. International Standards for Sustainable Wild Collection of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants (ISSC-MAP). Vol. 1. Bonn, Germany Bundesamt für Naturschutz. Google Scholar

21.

R. Mishra 1968. Ecology Workbook. Oxford, United Kingdom, and New Delhi, India Oxford and IBH. Google Scholar

22.

M. P. Nayar and A. R. K. Sastry . 1987–1990. Red Data Book of Indian Plants. Volumes 1–3. Calcutta, India Botanical Survey of India. Google Scholar

23.

Y. S. Negi and P. Bhalla . 2002. Collection and marketing of important medicinal and aromatic plants in tribal areas of H.P. Indian Forester 128:641–649. Google Scholar

24.

C. S. Olsen 1998. The trade in medicinal and aromatic plants from Central Nepal to Northern India. Economic Botany 52 (3):279–292. Google Scholar

25.

C. S. Olsen 2001. Trade in Himalayan medicinal plant product Picrorhiza—New data. Medical Plant Conservation 7:11–13. Google Scholar

26.

C. S. Olsen 2005. Trade and conservation of Himalayan medicinal plants: Nardostachys grandiflora DC. and Neopicrorhiza scrophulariiflora (Pennell) Hong. Biological Conservation 125:505–514. Google Scholar

27.

C. S. Olsen and F. Helles . 1997. Medicinal plants, markets and margins in Nepal Himalaya: Trouble in paradise. Mountain Research and Development 17 (4):363–374. Google Scholar

28.

C. S. Olsen and H. O. Larsen . 2003. Alpine medicinal plant trade and Himalayan mountain livelihood strategies. Geographic Journal 169 (3):243–254. Google Scholar

29.

O. Polunin and A. Stainton . 1984. Flowers of Himalaya. New Delhi, India Oxford University Press India. Google Scholar

30.

L. K. Rai, P. Prasad, and E. Sharma . 2000. Conservation threats to some important medicinal plants of the Sikkim Himalaya. Biological Conservation 93:27–33. Google Scholar

31.

L. K. Rai and E. Sharma . 2002. Diversity and indigenous uses of medicinal plants of Sikkim. In: S. S. Samant, U. Dhar, and L. M. S. Palni . editors. Himalayan Medicinal Plants. Potential and Prospects. Almora, India Gyanodaya Prakashan, Nainital. pp. 157–163. Google Scholar

32.

G. S. Rawat 2005. Alpine Meadows of Uttaranchal. Dehradun, India: Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh.  Google Scholar

33.

B. S. Sajwan and C. P. Kala . 2007. Conservation of medicinal plants: Conventional and contemporary strategies, regulations and executions. Indian Forester 133:484–495. Google Scholar

34.

S. S. Samant, U. Dhar, and L. M. S. Palni . 2001. Himalayan Medicinal Plants: Potential and Prospects. Almora, India Gyanodaya Prakashan, Nainital. Google Scholar

35.

S. S. Samant, S. Pant, M. Singh, M. Lal, A. Singh, A. Sharma, and S. Bhandari . 2007. Medicinal plants in Himachal Pradesh, North Western Himalaya, India. International Journal of Biodiversity Science and Management 3:234–251. Google Scholar

36.

Y. K. Sarin 2008. Principal Crude Herbal Drugs of India. An Illustrated Guide to Important Largely Used and Traded Medicinal Raw Materials of Plant Origin. Dehradun, India Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh. Google Scholar

37.

U. Schippman, D. J. Leaman, and A. B. Cunningham . 2002. Impact of cultivation and gathering of medicinal plants: Global trends and issues. In:. FAO [Food and Agriculture Organization] editor. Biodiversity and the Ecosystem Approach in Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Satellite Event on the Occasion of the Ninth Regular Session of the Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Rome, Italy, 12–13 October 2002.  Google Scholar

38.

G. K. Sharma 1995. Wake up call for Himachal. Amruth 6:3–4. Google Scholar

39.

J. M. Sheldon, M. Balicka, and S. Laird . 1998. Is using medicinal plants compatible with conservation? Plant Talk 98:29–31. Google Scholar

40.

H. Singh, P. Gahlan, S. Dutt, P. S. Ahuja, and S. Kumar . 2011. Why uproot Picrorhiza kurrooa, an endangered medicinal herb? Current Science 100:1055–1059. Google Scholar

41.

N. Subrat 2002. Ayurvedic and herbal products industry: An overview. Paper presented at the Workshop on Wise Practices and Experimental Learning in the Conservation and Management of Himalayan Medicinal Plants. Kathmandu, Nepal, 15–20 December 2002. Available from corresponding author of this article.  Google Scholar

42.

T. Ticktin 2004. The ecological implications of harvesting non-timber forest products. Journal of Applied Ecology 41:11–21. Google Scholar

43.

A. Uniyal, S. K. Uniyal, and G. S. Rawat . 2009. Status and extraction patterns of P. kurrooa Royle ex Benth. (Picrorhiza) in alpine meadows of western Himalaya. Indian Journal of Forestry 32 (4):569–574. Google Scholar

44.

S. K. Uniyal, A. Awasthi, and G. S. Rawat . 2002. Current status and distribution of commercially exploited medicinal and aromatic plants in upper Gori valley, Kumaon Himalaya, Uttaranchal. Current Science 82 (10):1246–1252. Google Scholar

45.

S. K. Uniyal, K. N. Singh, P. Jamwal, and Brij Lal . 2006. Traditional use of medicinal plants among the tribal communities of Chhota Bhangal, Western Himalaya. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 2:14. Google Scholar

46.

D. K. Ved and G. S. Goraya . 2008. Demand and Supply of Medicinal Plants in India. Bangalore, India BSMPS, D. Dun, and FRLHT. Google Scholar

47.

M. Virdi 2004. Wild plants as resource: New opportunities or last resort? Some dimensions of the collection, cultivation and trade of medicinal plants in the Gori Basin. In: G. Alam and J. Belt . editors. Searching Synergy Stakeholder Views on Developing a Sustainable Medicinal Plant Chain in Uttaranchal, India Royal Tropical Institute Bulletin No. 359. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Royal Tropical Institute,. pp. 41–54. Google Scholar

48.

C. S. Weckerle, Y. Yang, F. K. Huber, and Q. Li . 2010. People, money and protected areas: The collection of the caterpillar mushroom Ophiocordyceps sinensis in the Baima Xueshan Nature Reserve, Southwest China. Biodiversity and Conservation 19:2685–2698. Google Scholar

49.

R. G. Wild and J. Mutebi . 1996. Conservation through Community Use of Plant Resources: Establishing Collaborative Management at Bwindi Impenetrable and Mgahinga Gorilla National Parks, Uganda. People and Plants Working Paper 5. Paris, France UNESCO [United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization]. pp. 1–45. Google Scholar

50.

D. Winkler 2008. Yarsta Gumbu (Cordyceps sinensis) and the fungal commodification of Tibet's rural economy. Economic Botany 62 (3):291–305. Google Scholar
Anjali Uniyal, Sanjay Kr. Uniyal, and Gopal S. Rawat "Commercial Extraction of Picrorhiza kurrooa Royle ex Benth. in the Western Himalaya," Mountain Research and Development 31(3), 201-208, (1 August 2011). https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-10-00125.1
Accepted: 1 May 2011; Published: 1 August 2011
JOURNAL ARTICLE
8 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top