Although it is thought that predation has played a major role in the evolution of primate sociality, actual predation events involving primates are rarely documented (Van Schaik, 1983; Boinski et al., 2000). Birds of prey, felids, mustelids, and snakes are known predators of Neotropical primates. Most reported attacks by Neotropical snakes on monkeys are attributed to Boa constrictor, which feeds on callitrichids (Saguinus) and cebids (Saimiri, Cebus, Alouatta and Chiropotes), as well as a wide variety of smalland medium-sized mammals (didelphids, dasypodids, vespertilionids, molossids, procyonids, agoutids, dasyproctids, echimyids, murids and sciurids), birds (falconids, cotingids and formicarids), and reptiles (teiids) (Janzen, 1970; Greene, 1983; Chapman, 1986; Trail, 1987; Henderson et al., 1995; Martins and Oliveira, 1998; Thorstrom and Morales, 2000; Shahuano Tello et al., 2002; Perry et al., 2003; Urbani, 2003; Ferrari et al., 2004; pers. obs.).
Here we report an instance of predation by Boa constrictor on Callicebus discolor, observed during fieldwork at the Tiputini Biodiversity Station (TBS), a field station located in the Ecuadorian Amazon (00°37′05″S, 76°10′19″W, elev. 215 m; see Cisneros-Heredia, 2003). A total of 12 primate species have been recorded at TBS: Cebuella pygmaea, Saguinus tripartitus, Aotus vociferans, Callicebus discolor, Pithecia monachus, Pithecia aequatorialis, Saimiri sciureus, Cebus albifrons, Cebus apella, Alouatta seniculus, Lagothrix lagotricha and Ateles belzebuth. This is the first report of boa predation on monkeys of the genus Callicebus.
On 28 September 2003, at 11:30 am, we heard the calls of at least two Callicebus discolor. Following the calls, we discovered an adult Boa constrictor (total length ca. four meters) constricting a Callicebus discolor in a tree, approximately five meters above ground. The boa was coiled around the monkey, still shifting and squeezing. A second monkey was about four meters from the boa at the same height and called out once. No physical interactions were observed between the second monkey and the boa. The boa remained coiled around the carcass for some 45 minutes and then took approximately one hour to swallow it.
Reducing the risk of predation has been hypothesized to be one of the benefits of group living, and group behaviours such as alarm calls, mobbing and counter-attacks have been reported as primate responses to predation attempts by snakes (Chapman, 1986; Bartecki and Heymann, 1987; Shahuano Tello et al., 2002). During this predation event, the only response behaviour we recorded was the calling from the second individual (rather short, classified into the second group of Robinson, 1979). The absence of other response behaviours cannot be assumed, however, because we arrived when the boa was already constricting the monkey. It is unknown how predation events may have functioned in the evolution of sociality in Callicebus, but this observation, together with similar reports (Chapman, 1986; Bartecki and Heymann, 1987; Martins and Oliveira, 1998; Shahuano Tello et al., 2002; Perry et al., 2003; Ferrari et al., 2004), suggests that snakes play a major role as predators of Neotropical primates.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Eckhard W. Heymann, Stella de la Torre and Kelly Swing for their critical reading of the manuscript. Susan Perry, Eckhard W. Heymann and Stella de la Torre provided relevant literature. Maria Elena Heredia, Laura Heredia and Hector León provided financial and moral support. Tiputini Biodiversity Station / Universidad San Francisco de Quito provided institutional and logistical support. Video files of this event are deposited in the archives of the Tiputini Biodiversity Station, Universidad San Francisco de Quito. This is a publication of the project “Study of the Herpetofauna of the Tiputini Biodiversity Station” (D. F. Cisneros-Heredia, investigator).