Open Access
Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2014 A Preliminary Assessment of Sifaka (Propithecus) Distribution, Chromatic Variation and Conservation in Western Central Madagascar
Laingoniaina Herifito Fidèle Rakotonirina, Fetraharimalala Randriantsara, Andoniaina Harilala Rakotoarisoa, Rado Rakotondrabe, Josia Razafindramanana, Jonah Ratsimbazafy, Tony King
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

To help inform conservation efforts for the Endangered crowned sifaka Propithecus coronatus, in 2010, we attempted to better define the known distribution of sifakas in western central Madagascar through field surveys of 17 sites we considered likely to fall in or close to the historic range of P. coronatus. We observed P. coronatus at seven sites, in the Boeny, Betsiboka and Bongolava regions. At three sites at the intersection of the regions of Bongolava, Melaky and Menabe we observed populations containing sifaka of P. deckenii appearance mixed with melanistic individuals. We observed P. verreauxi at the two most southerly sites, in the Amoron'i Mania Region, and P. coquereli at one north-easterly site in the Betsiboka Region, a southern extension of 90 km to the known range of the species. At the four remaining sites, sifaka appeared to be either absent or extinct. We observed two other lemur species, Eulemur mongoz in the Boeny Region, and E. rufus in the Betsiboka Region, the latter observation being a small extension to the species' known range. We noted variation in pelage coloration amongst the P. coronatus individuals we observed, mainly regarding the extent and tone of the rufous wash on the back, arms and legs, but also in the color of the head, and the presence or absence of dark patches on the nape or at the root of the tail. The melanistic forms of P. deckenii varied greatly, some being very dark brown on large areas of the head, back, arms and legs, and appearing unlike any typical sifaka species, others exhibiting an intermediate coloration fairly similar to P. coronatus. We therefore suggest that P. coronatus should not be considered to represent an extreme melanistic form of P. deckenii, and that most previous reports of possible sympatry between the two taxa might alternatively be explained by a melanistic tendency in P. deckenii, possibly arising from occasional gene flow from P. coronatus. Our results show that P. coronatus may now be considered widely distributed through western central Madagascar, but most forests in this area are small and fragmented, and sifaka populations are highly endangered. We therefore recommend the implementation of immediate conservation interventions to ensure the maintenance of the full range of chromatic and genetic diversity of P. coronatus.

Introduction

The crowned sifaka Propithecus coronatus is classified on the IUCN Red List as Endangered (IUCN 2012). It appears to have a poorly-known range in the wild, with the largest known populations surviving in the fragmented, dry deciduous forests between the Betsiboka and Mahavavy rivers in north-west Madagascar (Mittermeier et al. 2010; Salmona et al. this issue). To the north and east of the Betsiboka River it is replaced by Coquerel's sifaka P. coquereli, and to the south and west of the Mahavavy river by Decken's sifaka P. deckenii (Mittermeier et al. 2010). Populations of P. coronatus have also been reported in fragmented forests in the Boeny and Bongolava regions south to Tsiroanomandidy and the Sakay River (Milne-Edwards and Grandidier 1875; Tattersall 1986; Thalmann et al. 2002; Mittermeier et al. 2010), and the most southerly known site was recently discovered in the Menabe Region near Miandrivazo (Razafindramanana and Rasamimanana 2010). To the south and south-west of its range the species is replaced by Verreaux's sifaka P. verreauxi (Mittermeier et al. 2010; Razafindramanana and Rasamimanana 2010).

This general distribution of these four sifaka species is, however, not quite as neat as we have just described. Several taxonomic and distributional issues regarding this group remain unresolved. Historically, many authors considered them all as subspecies of P. verreauxi (Hill 1935; Petter et al. 1977; Tattersall 1982), whilst others have proposed that P. coronatus and P. deckenii are a single taxon, either as a monospecific P. deckenii, or as a single subspecies of P. verreauxi (Tattersall 1988; Pastorini et al. 2001). Several authors have given detailed syntheses elsewhere (Thalmann et al. 2002; Groves and Helgen 2007; Mittermeier et al. 2008, 2010), so to summarize, much of this discussion concerning P. coronatus and P. deckenii arises from the observation that sifaka populations in the northern reaches of the Mahavavy River are generally either of P. coronatus coloration to the east (white body with a predominantly black head) or of P. deckenii coloration to the west (white body with a white head), whilst several observations further south include individuals resembling both forms (Curtis et al. 1998; Randrianarisoa et al. 2001b; Thalmann et al. 2002), or melanistic forms which resemble neither species (Petter and Peyrieras 1972; Petter et al. 1977). Further confusion appears to have arisen from equivocal interpretations of written descriptions of pelage variation given in older publications that generally lack photographs or illustrations, and also to some extent the lack of precise coordinates for some observations.

These unresolved issues have several consequences for conservation, not least because the conservation status of a taxon depends on which populations are included within it, and also because in developing a conservation program, planners need to define what they are attempting to conserve (Blair et al. 2011). They also need to be confident that they know the distribution of a taxon, in order to be able to assess its abundance and status, and to design appropriate conservation interventions (Rakotonirina et al. 2011). Within the framework of a conservation project for P. coronatus (The Aspinall Foundation 2009, 2010), we therefore attempted to better define the known distribution of the species through field surveys of sites in western central Madagascar that we considered likely to fall within or close to its historic range. In this paper we present the results of our survey work during 2010, including newly-reported sites supporting sifakas, descriptions and photographs of the pelage variation we found within sifaka populations at these sites, and preliminary assessments of the threats they face at each.

Methods

We surveyed 17 sites in 16 communes of six administrative regions of western central Madagascar (Table 1). The six most northerly sites were at low altitude (12 to 384 m) in the Boeny and Betsiboka regions; the remaining 11 sites were at mid to high altitude (657 to 1339 m) in the Bongolava, Melaky, Menabe and Amoron'i Mania regions. We undertook several missions between January and December 2010 to survey all these sites (Table 1). We consulted local authorities and local populations in each zone before selecting the precise localities for our surveys at each site. Accompanied by local guides and at some sites by local gendarmes, we searched for sifaka following paths in the forest or by walking along the edge of forest patches or gallery forests. On each occasion that we observed sifaka, we took a GPS point and noted the date and time of the observation, the size of the group, the sex and age-class of each individual wherever possible, and described their coloration. We also noted the presence of any other lemur species we encountered, and any evidence of threats to the sites. Lemur nomenclature follows Mittermeier et al. (2010), and vegetation classifications follow Moat and Smith (2007).

Table 1.

Sites surveyed during 2010. Summary of the main results regarding the presence of sifaka and other lemurs.

Boeny Region

The largest known populations of P. coronatus occur in the Boeny Region, particularly in the communes of Katsepy, Antongomena Bevary and Mitsinjo, and have been the focus of several studies (Curtis et al. 1998; Muller et al. 2000; Pichon et al. 2010; Salmona et al. this issue). This region was therefore not a priority area for our surveys. However, we did survey one site in the region, Anaboazo in the commune of Ambato Boeny, as we received reliable information regarding the presence of the species in this unprotected and previously unsurveyed forest (M. Mbaraka pers. comm.). The region is the most forested of those we surveyed, consisting of fragmented western dry forest and wooded grassland—bushland and plateau grassland-wooded grassland mosaics (Moat and Smith 2007).

Betsiboka Region

We surveyed five sites in the Betsiboka Region, which apparently had never been reported as supporting P. coronatus populations; the Kasijy Special Reserve is located in this region, but supports primarily P. deckenii, with only a few individuals that reportedly resemble P. coronatus (Randrianarisoa et al. 2001b). We selected two of these sites because they were in or near proposed new protected areas (Kamoro and Maevatanana-Ambato-Boeni Wetlands), and the other three due to the apparently large tracts of remaining forest (relative to surrounding areas) and their apparent relative ease of access (based on proximity to roads and other routes). The vegetation present in this region is similar to that of the Boeny Region, but with considerably less forest cover (Moat and Smith 2007).

Bongolava, Menabe and Melaky Regions

The Bongolava Region has long been known to harbor P. coronatus populations (Milne-Edwards and Grandidier 1875; Petter and Peyrieras 1972; Petter et al. 1977; Tattersall 1986; Petter and Andriatsarafana 1987) but reports are based on only a few observations, some of which lack precise locality data while others provide confusing accounts of variable pelage coloration. This region, along with adjacent areas of the Menabe and Melaky regions that had previously been found to support populations of sifaka containing individuals resembling both P. deckenii and P. coronatus and melanistic forms (Petter and Peyrieras 1972; Petter et al. 1977; Randrianarisoa et al. 2001a; Thalmann et al. 2002), was therefore the main focus of our surveys. We visited nine sites across these regions. We chose three of them because they had been proposed as protected areas (Ambohitromby, Mahajeby and Andasilaikatsaka), one due to local information regarding the presence of black-headed white lemurs (Ampandrambe), and the remaining five following the advice of the regional environment and forestry authority (DREF Tsiroanomandidy pers. comm.). This area comprises predominantly wooded grassland—bushland and plateau grassland-wooded grassland mosaics, with only very restricted areas of western dry forest, often as gallery forest along watercourses (Moat and Smith 2007). A relatively large patch of azonal humid forest occurs in and around the Ambohijanahary Special Reserve near the intersection of the three regions (Moat and Smith 2007).

Amoron'i Mania Region

We visited two sites in the Amoron'i Mania Region, in the vicinity of the Itremo new protected area, to verify previous reports that sifaka here were P. verreauxi (Wilmé and Callander 2006; Wilmé et al. 2006), and therefore confirm the southern limit of P. coronatus. The predominant vegetation is classified as a mosaic of plateau grassland and wooded grassland, with gallery forests so limited that they do not show up on the vegetation map of Moat and Smith (2007).

Results

We made direct observations of sifaka at 13 of the 17 survey sites (Table 1; Fig. 1). We observed sifaka appearing to be P. coronatus at seven sites, in the Boeny, Betsiboka and Bongolava regions (Tables 1 and 2; Fig. 2). At three sites in the Melaky and Menabe regions we observed populations of sifaka of P. deckenii appearance mixed with melanistic individuals (Tables 1 and 2; Fig. 3). We found P. verreauxi at the two most southerly sites, in the Amoron'i Mania Region, and P. coquereli at one north-easterly site in the Betsiboka Region (Table 1; Fig. 4). At the four remaining sites sifaka appeared to be either absent or extinct (Table 1). We recorded only two other lemurs during the surveys; Eulemur mongoz at Anaboazo and Eulemur rufus at Ikay (Table 1; Fig. 4).

We noted variation in pelage coloration amongst the P. coronatus individuals we observed, mainly regarding the extent and tone of the rufous wash on the back, arms and legs, but also in the color of the head, and the presence or absence of dark patches on the nape or at the root of the tail (Table 3; Fig. 2). The most heavily-colored individuals occurred at the Andasilaikatsaka site, whilst at the other sites the within-site variation between individuals appeared to be similar to the between-site variation (Table 3; Fig. 2).

At the three sites where we recorded P. deckenii, 80% of individuals we observed (60 of 80) were of typical P. deckenii coloration (predominantly white with a black face), with a few that were lightly-washed golden on the back, and very rarely with a darkish patch on the nape (Table 4; Fig. 3). The remaining 20% exhibited varying degrees of melanism, which for the sake of simplicity we split into two forms for the pelage descriptions, the “intermediate” form of which some could be described as being similar to P. coronatus in coloration, and the “very dark” form which is very dark brown on large areas of the head, back, arms and legs, and is unlike any typical sifaka species (Table 4; Fig. 3). Of 22 sifaka groups observed at these three sites, 13 (59%) consisted of only white individuals, one (5%) of only melanistic individuals, and eight (36%) of both white and melanistic forms (Table 2). During the August sample period, we twice observed melanistic females carrying white infants, in addition to four instances of white infants carried by white females (Table 2).

Figure 1.

Map of west and western central Madagascar showing distributional records of four sifaka species in relation to regions and major rivers. New sites reported here are given as numbered black symbols, and previously published sites as grey symbols, of P. coronatus (stars), P. deckenii (inverted triangles), P. deckenii occurring sympatrically with melanistic forms (circles), Verreaux's sifaka P. verreauxi (triangles) and Coquerel's sifaka P. coquereli (diamonds). The question mark represents the site of Ambohitantely, where P. coronatus is claimed to have occurred in the past by some authors, but the accuracy of this account is questionable. Note that at the site on the south bank of the Manambolo River, one P. deckenii was also recorded in addition to six P. coronatus (Thalmann and Rakotoarison 1994). Previously published sites are taken principally from Wilmé et al. 2006 and references therein, plus additional records from Tattersall (1986), Thalmann and Rakotoarison (1994), Razafindramanana and Rasamimanana (2010), and Salmona et al. (this issue); for further details see The Aspinall Foundation (2010). The names of our numbered survey sites are: 1: Anaboazo; 2: Maevatanana-Ambato-Boeni Wetlands; 3: Mandrava; 4: Ikay; 5: Ambohitromby; 6: Mahajeby; 7: Andasilaikatsaka; 8: Fiadanana; 9: Antsakasarotra; 10: Orimbato; 11: Betonendry/Maroakanga; 12: Andakata — Ambolokely; 13: Andondona: Analakinganala.

The size of the P. coronatus groups we observed ranged from one to eight individuals (Table 2; mean = 4.2, sd = 1.83, n = 18), and of groups at the three sites with P. deckenii and melanistic forms counts were from one to six individuals (Table 2; mean = 3.4, sd = 1.22, n = 22).

We noted the presence of a number of threats to the sifaka and their habitat at each site (Table 5). Of the ten sites where we observed either P. coronatus or P. deckenii, we found evidence of hunting of the sifaka at seven sites, and varying degrees of habitat destruction or disturbance at every site (Table 5). The extent of forest cover varied between sites, but at each of the seven sites where we observed P. coronatus the forest was fragmented, with a general north to south tendency of decreasing size of fragments and increasing distance between fragments.

Discussion

Distribution of and chromatic variation in P. coronatus and P. deckenii

We report here the first published observations of P. coronatus at seven sites in the Boeny, Betsiboka and Bongolava regions, which help refine our understanding of the current range of the species. Comparing our new records with previously published records of P. coronatus, P. deckenii, P. verreauxi and P. coquereli (Fig. 1), it appears that P. coronatus remains distributed more-or-less throughout the remaining forests of north-west and western central Madagascar, from Katespy in the north to Dabolava in the south, approximately between the Mahavavy River to the west and the Ikopa and/or Betsiboka rivers to the east. There is some uncertainty about whether P. coronatus occurs, or has occurred, between the Ikopa and Betsiboka rivers. We failed to find sifaka at the one site we surveyed between these rivers, and the only published record from the area is one of the species having apparently gone extinct at Ambohitantely Special Reserve (Petter and Andriatsarafana 1987). Apparently this record arose, however, from an error in translation (S. Goodman, pers. comm.) and therefore we consider the presence of P. coronatus east of the Ikopa River to be unconfirmed. There appears to be even greater confusion about sifaka species limits in the south-west of the P. coronatus range (Fig. 1), so we recommend further surveys between the Mahajilo, Manambolo and Tsiribihina rivers to clarify sifaka distributions in this region.

Our reports of three sites in the Melaky and Menabe regions containing sifaka populations comprising individuals of classic P. deckenii coloration mixed with individuals exhibiting varying degrees of melanism reflect previously published observations in the Ambohijanahary forest and Special Reserve located 1 to 40 km south of our observations (Randrianarisoa et al. 2001a; Thalmann et al. 2002), the Kasijy Special Reserve located 140 km north of our sites (Randrianarisoa et al. 2001b), and in the Bongolava Massif (Petter and Peyrieras 1972, reprinted in French by Petter et al. 1977), which includes the general region of our observations. These authors all report sifaka populations consisting mostly of white P. deckenii individuals, but with varying proportions of individuals showing melanistic features, and/or individuals closely resembling P. coronatus. Unfortunately most of these publications lack photographs or illustrations, and there is a lack of consistency between written descriptions of the variation in pelage coloration. Nevertheless, several of the descriptions (for example, Randrianarisoa et al. 2001b at Kasijy, and some of those given by Petter and Peyrieras 1972) can be considered consistent with one or other of the two melanistic forms we describe, the “very dark” and “intermediate” forms, of which the latter resembles P. coronatus to a greater or lesser extent depending on the individual. Other descriptions suggest even lighter forms (for example, Randrianarisoa et al. 2001a at Ambohijanahary, and one of those given by Petter and Peyrieras 1972), with a whitish or lightly colored head and darker or blackish patches restricted to the nape, upper back and arms. We did not recognize a “light” melanistic form during our surveys, although some of the individuals we considered as white P. deckenii did show a dark grey patch on the nape (Table 4). In another area with several reports of sites containing both white P. deckenii and darker-colored sifaka, between the Mahavavy River and the Kinkony Lake in the Boeny Region (Thalmann et al. 2002) 250 km north of our P. deckenii observations, Curtis et al. (1998) describe individuals which appear to resemble our “intermediate” form, but also a “lighter melanistic variant.” which closely resembles a white P. deckenii but with a dark brown ventral surface and an off-white to silvery-grey head. Tattersall (1986) describes four museum specimens from approximately the same area with variably pale silver-brown heads (excluding the ears), and pale silver-brown on the anterior aspects of the limbs and the upper back, fading towards the rump; a description that appears to fall between our “intermediate” form and the “light” forms described from elsewhere.

Table 2.

Details of groups of P. coronatus and P. deckenii observed during our survey.

Figure 2.

Chromatic variation of P. coronatus at the survey sites from the Boeny and Betsiboka regions (top line) and the Bongolava Region (bottom line): Anaboazo (a), Ikay (b and e), Mandrava (c and d), Ambohitromby (f), Mahajeby (g) and Andasilaikatsaka (h–j). Photographs by L. Rakotonirina.

Table 3.

Chromatic description of P. coronatus observed at the survey sites.

Figure 3.

Chromatic variation of sifaka at the Orimbato site, including typical white P. deckenii (a and b), forms that we refer to as intermediate melanistic forms of which some resemble P. coronatus (b–e), and very dark melanistic forms which resemble neither P. deckenii nor P. coronatus (bottom line). Photographs by L. Rakotonirina.

Table 4.

Chromatic description of P. deckenii and melanistic forms observed at the sites of Fiadanana, Antsakasarotra and Orimbato.

Figure 4.

P. verreauxi at Analakinganala, P. coquereli at Betonendry/Maroakanga, Eulemur rufus at Ikay, and E. mongoz at Anaboazo. Photographs by L. Rakotonirina except those of P. verreauxi by R. Rakotondrabe.

Table 5.

Threats observed at each of the survey sites where we observed either P. coronatus or P. deckenii.

It appears therefore that melanistic forms of P. deckenii vary in a fairly continuous manner from “light” forms closely resembling classic white P. deckenii with only limited melanistic features, through “intermediate” forms that in some cases resemble P. coronatus, to “very dark” forms that resemble neither P. coronatus nor classic P. deckenii. We note that dark melanistic adults have been reported with both dark (Petter and Peyrieras 1972) and white infants (Table 2; also Petter and Peyrieras 1972), but that white adults have so far been reported only with white infants (Table 2; also Petter and Peyrieras 1972). Further observations are therefore required to determine whether white females do occasionally produce dark infants or not.

The fact that all reported observations of melanistic individuals of P. deckenii are from sites along the eastern boundary of the species range, east of which the species is replaced by P. coronatus, suggests that the underlying reason behind this melanistic tendency might be occasional gene flow with P. coronatus, with locally plausible scenarios suggested for several of the areas with melanistic P. deckenii given by Thalmann et al. (2002). If this is the case, however, it is hard to see why this would result in some “very dark” forms much darker than typical members of either species, as we report here, especially as the only reported description of a deckenii × coronatus hybrid (Petter 1969) appears to resemble our “intermediate” form, or why the majority of individuals in these populations do not show signs of hybridization (Petter and Peyrieras 1972; Petter et al. 1977). Given the doubt over the plausibility of the hybridization hypothesis for explaining the melanistic tendencies in P. deckenii and some other Propithecus species, an alternative hypothesis was given by Petter and Peyrieras (1972) and Petter et al. (1977) regarding genetic selection processes related to altitude and climatic factors, with areas of high melanistic tendencies being climatically intermediate between the principle distributional areas of typical forms, and therefore minimizing the impacts of such selection leading to increased expression of variation. Over 35 years on from this discussion the question appears to remain unresolved, and we therefore recommend further research into the subject, incorporating genetic analysis. This would best include all known cases of chromatically-variable sifaka populations, including the interesting population in the eastern rainforest at Tsinjoarivo, which apparently exhibits a range of colorations from all-white to all-black via various forms resembling to a greater or lesser extent the diademed sifaka P. diadema (Mittermeier et al. 2010, pp.532–533). Such a study could also include the indri Indri indri, another member of the Indriidae family which exhibits variable coloration from predominantly black to variegated black-and-white, sometimes within the same populations (Thalmann et al. 1993; Zaonarivelo et al. 2007; Mittermeier et al. 2010).

Despite not understanding the underlying causes, our interpretation of melanistic tendencies in P. deckenii implies that the majority of cases of proposed sympatry between P. deckenii and P. coronatus given in previous literature may alternatively be explained by melanism in P. deckenii, and therefore that the two taxa may not actually be sympatric. The occasional observation of P. deckenii individuals amongst otherwise P. coronatus populations (Tattersall 1982, 1988; Thalmann and Rakotoarison 1994) can probably be explained by local and rare events of P. deckenii crossing rivers or other biogeographical boundaries by one means or another (including possibly escapes or releases of sifaka kept as pets by local people on the opposing bank of a river to where they were captured). The idea that P. coronatus might simply represent the extreme end of melanistic tendencies in P. deckenii is also not supported by our observations, as “very dark” melanistic P. deckenii are considerably darker than P. coronatus, and chromatic variation in most known P. coronatus populations is relatively limited. There is apparently a slight tendency of increasing rufous coloration on the back and limbs of P. coronatus, from the generally whitish forms in the north of the range (Milne-Edwards and Grandidier 1875; Petter and Peyrieras 1972), through the variably whitish to lightly or more heavily washed rufous forms in the southern Boeny Region, the Betsiboka Region, and the northern Bongolava Region (Table 3), to the often (but not always) more heavily washed rufous forms at Andasilaikatsaka in the southern Bongolava Region (Table 3). The only other potential melanistic tendencies that we have observed include the occurrence of a blackish patch on the nape, or a light or dark rufous patch at the root of the tail (Table 3; Fig. 2). We observed the former feature at our two most southerly survey sites, in the Bongolava Region, but the darkest examples of the latter feature were in the Betsiboka Region, approximately in the central region of the species latitudinal range. Some sifaka in the Betsiboka Region also showed the lightest-colored heads of all the survey sites, being a fairly bright brownish red color, whereas elsewhere heads were blackish or dark brown with only a tinge of red (Table 3; Fig. 2).

There appear to be only two prior reports of more extensive melanistic tendencies in P. coronatus. One is at the most southerly-known site at Dabolava in the Menabe Region, where some individuals show varying degrees of dark blackish patches on their shoulders, mid-back, and the upper aspects of their arms and thighs (Razafindramanana and Rasamimanana 2010; J. Razafindramanana, unpubl. photos), in a similar pattern to that shown by melanistic variants of P. verreauxi (Mittermeier et al. 2010, pp. 526–527). The other is the description of a pair of sifakas captured on the track from Tsiroanomandidy to Ankavandra (Paulian 1953 cited by Petter and Peyrieras 1972), where the male was slightly more rufous dorsally than a typical P. coronatus, and the female heavily black on the head, upper back, arms, hands, and ventrally, and grey on the nape base, lower back and tail. Given the lack of a precise location, however, it is difficult to interpret this observation in more detail. Further research into chromatic variation in P. deckenii and P. coronatus in western central Madagascar is clearly required to resolve this issue, and to better understand the distributions of the two taxa and their history of gene exchange.

Distribution of other species observed during the surveys

Our observations of P. verreauxi at two sites in the Amoron'i Mania Region confirm two previous observations of the species in the Region, made in the Itremo protected area (Wilmé et al. 2006; Wilmé and Callmander 2006). The Mania River therefore appears to represent the distributional limit between this species and P. coronatus to the north (Razafindramanana and Rasamimanana 2010; Fig. 1). Our observations of P. coquereli at the Betonendry/Maroakanga site in the Betsiboka Region represent a southern extension of 90 km to the known range of the species (Fig. 1; Wilmé et al. 2006; Mittermeier et al. 2008, 2010). As with all other records of the species, the site is located to the east of the Betsiboka River (Fig. 1). The P. verreauxi and P. coquereli we observed were of typical coloration for their respective species (Fig. 4).

Our observation of two groups of Eulemur mongoz at the Anaboazo site in the Boeny Region represents a new location for this species, listed as Vulnerable on the IUCN Red List (IUCN 2012). The site is within the known species range (Mittermeier et al. 2010). Conversely, our observation of Eulemur rufus at the Ikay site in the Betsiboka Region appears to represent a small range extension for this species. Although Mittermeier et al. (2010) state that the species only occurs south and west of the Mahavavy River, there are several reported sites north and east of this river, west of the Betsiboka River (Wilmé et al. 2006). The Ikay site is 60 km southeast of the closest previously published site of Madirovalo in the Boeny Region (Rasoloharijaona et al. 2005; Wilmé et al. 2006), and 70 km east of the Kasijy Special Reserve, the closest site illustrated on the distribution map in Mittermeier et al. (2010).

Conservation implications for P. coronatus

Although P. coronatus may now be considered widely distributed through western central Madagascar, forest cover is very limited throughout most of its range, and most forests are small and fragmented. Any sifaka populations remaining in such fragmented forests are highly endangered due to anthropogenic threats such as hunting and habitat loss or degradation (Table 5), and to demographic influences related to small population sizes and isolation from other populations (Gilpin and Soulé 1986; Frankham 2005). Although the mean group size of P. coronatus we observed was almost the same as that observed by Pichon et al. (2010) in the relatively large population at Antrema, and larger than that given by Salmona et al. (this issue) elsewhere in the north of the species range, we encountered only one to five groups per survey site. The duration of our surveys was very limited at each site, and we therefore almost certainly overlooked some groups, but the available habitat at each site was very restricted, and population sizes are surely very low. We have therefore initiated further surveys at each of the seven new P. coronatus sites we report here, to obtain more accurate measures of population densities and habitat parameters, to collect fecal samples for genetic analysis, and to identify more specific conservation priorities. We recommend that conservation priorities include various aspects such as collaborative research to refine our knowledge of sifaka distribution, taxonomy, and chromatic variation, local education programs, socioeconomic development projects, facilitation of law enforcement efforts, and the creation and management of conservation zones that ensure the maintenance of the full range of chromatic and genetic diversity of P. coronatus.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Environment and Forests Ministry of the government of Madagascar, represented by the Regional Directions of Bongolava, Betsiboka and Boeny, for their permission to undertake this research. We also thank all the traditional and administrative authorities of the zones we visited, the rural communes, fokontany, Gendarme, and local guides, porters and cooks, for their generous collaboration during this study. We thank Christelle Chamberlan, Mohamad Mbaraka, Rose Marie Randrianarison and Maholy Ravaloharimanitra for their help in organizing the study; and Lounès Chikhi and Urs Thalmann for their excellent reviews of the paper. The survey was financed by The Aspinall Foundation, within the framework of their Tsibahaka project for the conservation of the crowned sifaka.

Literature cited

1.

M. E. Blair , E. J. Sterling and M. M. Hurley . 2011. Taxonomy and conservation of Vietnam's primates: a review. Am. J. Primatol. 73: 1093–1106. Google Scholar

2.

C. Pichon , R. Ramanamisata , L. Tarnaud , F. Bayart , A. Hladik , C. M. Hladik and B. Simmen . 2010. Feeding ecology of the crowned sifaka (Propithecus coronatus) in a coastal dry forest in northwest Madagascar (SFUM, Antrema). Lemur News 15: 42–46. Google Scholar

3.

D. J. Curtis , A. Velo , E.-O. Raheliarisoa , A. Zaramody and P. Müller . 1998. Surveys on Propithecus verrauxi deckeni, a melanistic variant, and P. v. coronatus in northwest Madagascar. Oryx 32: 157–164. Google Scholar

4.

R. Frankham 2005. Genetics and extinction. Biol. Conserv. 126: 131–140. Google Scholar

5.

M. E. Gilpin and M. E. Soulé . 1986. Minimum viable populations: processes of species extinction. In: Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity, M. E. Soulé (ed.), pp.19–34. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA. Google Scholar

6.

C. P. Groves and K. M. Helgen . 2007. Craniodental characters in the taxonomy of Propithecus. Int. J. Primatol. 28: 1363–1383. Google Scholar

7.

W. C. O. Hill1953. Primates: Comparative Anatomy and Taxonomy I. Strepsirhini. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh. Google Scholar

8.

IUCN. 2012. 2012 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), Species Survival Commission (SSC), Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. Website: < http://www.redlist.org>. Google Scholar

9.

A. Milne-Edwards and A. Grandidier. 1875. L'histoire politique, physique et naturelle de Madagascar: Histoire naturelle des mammifères. Imprimerie Nationale, Paris. Google Scholar

10.

R. A. Mittermeier , J. U. Ganzhorn , W. R. Konstant , K. Glander , I. Tattersall , C. P. Groves , A. B. Rylands , A. Hapke , J. Ratsimbazafy , M. I. Mayor , E. E. Louis Jr ., Y. Rumpler , C. Schwitzer and R. M. Rasoloarison . 2008. Lemur diversity in Madagascar. Int. J. Primatol. 29: 1607–1656. Google Scholar

11.

R. A. Mittermeier , E. E. Louis Jr ., M. Richardson , C. Schwitzer , O. Langrand , A. B. Rylands , F. Hawkins , S. Rajaobelina , J. Ratsimbazafy , R. Rasoloarison , C. Roos , P. M. Kappeler and J. Mackinnon . 2010. Lemurs of Madagascar. 3rd edition. Conservation International, Arlington, VA. Google Scholar

12.

J. Moat and P. Smith . 2007. Atlas of the Vegetation of Madagascar / Atlas de la Vegetation de Madagascar., Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, London. Google Scholar

13.

P. Müller , A. Velo , E.-O. Rahelarisoa , A. Zaramody and D. J. Curtis . 2000. Surveys of five sympatric lemurs at Anjamena, northwest Madagascar. Afr. J. Ecol. 38: 248–257. Google Scholar

14.

J. Pastorini , M. R. J. Forstner and R. D. Martin . 2001. Phylogenetic history of sifakas (Propithecus: Lemuriformes) derived from mtDNA sequences. Am. J. Primatol. 53: 1–17. Google Scholar

15.

J.-J. Petter 1969. Speciation in Madagascan lemurs. Biol. J. Linn. Society 1: 77–84. Google Scholar

16.

J.-J. Petter and F. Andriatsarafara. 1987. Conservation status and distribution of lemurs in the west and northwest of Madagascar. Primate Conserv. (8): 169–171. Google Scholar

17.

J.-J. Petter and A. Peyrieras . 1972. Melanization in the genus Propithecus Malagasy lemur. J. Hum. Evol. 1: 379–388. Google Scholar

18.

J.-J. Petter, R. Albignac and Y. Rumpler. 1977. Mammifères Lémuriens (Primates Prosimiens). Faune de Madagascar 44: ORSTOM/CNRS, Paris. Google Scholar

19.

L. Rakotonirina , A. Rajaonson , T. Ratolojanahary , J. Rafalimandimby , P. Fanomezantsoa , B. Ramahefasoa , T. Rasolofoharivelo , M. Ravaloharimanitra , J. Ratsimbazafy , R. Dolch and T. King . 2011. New distributional records and conservation implications for the critically endangered greater bamboo lemur Prolemur simus. Folia Primatol. 82(2): 118–129. Google Scholar

20.

P. M. Randrianarisoa, A. Rasamison and L. Rakotozafy. 2001a. Notes sur la faune lémurienne dans la Réserve Spéciale d'Ambohijanahary. Lemur News 6: 5. Google Scholar

21.

P. M. Randrianarisoa, A. Rasamison, L. Rakotozafy and A. Totovolahy. 2001b. Inventaire des lémuriens dans la Réserve Spéciale de Kasijy. Lemur News 6: 7–8. Google Scholar

22.

S. Rasoloharijaona , B. Randrianambinina , B. Rakotosamimanana and E. Zimmermann . 2005. Inventaires des lémuriens dans la forêt d'Andranovelona / Madirovalo (nord ouest de Madagascar), les “savoka” dé Manehoko, la Réserve de Lokobe, la Réserve Spéciale de l'Ankarana, et le Réserve Spéciale d'Analamerana, au nord de Madagascar. Lemur News 10: 8–11. Google Scholar

23.

J. Razafindramanana and R. B. Rasamimanana . 2010. Discovery of crowned sifaka (Propithecus coronatus) in Dabolava, Miandrivazo, Menabe Region. Lemur News 15: 23–25. Google Scholar

24.

J. Salmona, E. Rasolondraibe, F. Jan, A. Besolo, H. Rakotoarisoa, S. Viana Meyler, S. Wohlhauser, C. Rabarivola and L. Chikhi. this issue. Conservation Status and Abundance of the Crown Sifaka (Propithecus coronatus). Primate Conserv. this issue. Google Scholar

25.

I. Tattersall 1982. The Primates of Madagascar. Columbia University Press, New York. Google Scholar

26.

I. Tattersall 1986. Notes on the distribution and taxonomic status of some species of Propithecus in Madagascar. Folia Primatol. 46: 51–63. Google Scholar

27.

I. Tattersall 1988. Distribution survey of the Malagasy lemurs: request for information and initial report. Primate Conserv. (9): 116–117. Google Scholar

28.

U. Thalmann and N. Rakotoarison . 1994. Distribution of lemurs in central western Madagascar, with a regional distribution hypothesis. Folia Primatol. 63: 156–161. Google Scholar

29.

U. Thalmann , T. Geissmann , A. Simona and T. Mutschler . 1993. The indris of Anjanaharibe-Sud, northeastern Madagascar. Int. J. Primatol. 14: 357–381. Google Scholar

30.

U. Thalmann , R. Kümmerli and A. Zaramody . 2002. Why Propithecus verreauxi deckeni and P. v. coronatus are valid taxa—quantitative and qualitative arguments. Lemur News 7: 11–16. Google Scholar

31.

The Aspinall Foundation 2009. Proposal for the creation of Projet Tsibahaka: Conservation of the Crowned Sifaka Propithecus coronatus. The Aspinall Foundation, Antananarivo, Madagascar. 5pp. Google Scholar

32.

The Aspinall Foundation 2010. Projet Tsibahaka: Conserving the Crowned Sifaka Propithecus coronatus — Initial results., Report The Aspinall Foundation, Antananarivo, Madagascar. 10pp. Google Scholar

33.

L. Wilmé and M. W. Callmander . 2006. Les populations reliques de primates: les Propithèques. Lemur News 11: 24–31. Google Scholar

34.

L. Wilmé , S. M. Goodman and J. U. Ganzhorn . 2006. Biogeographic evolution of Madagascar's microendemic biota. Science 312: 1063–1065. Google Scholar

35.

J. R. Zaonarivelo , R. Andriantompohavana , S. E. Engberg , S. G. Kelley , J.-C. Randriamanana , E. E. Louis Jr . and R. A. Brenneman . 2007. Morphometric data for Indri (Indri indri) collected from ten forest fragments in eastern Madagascar. Lemur News 12: 17–21. Google Scholar
Laingoniaina Herifito Fidèle Rakotonirina, Fetraharimalala Randriantsara, Andoniaina Harilala Rakotoarisoa, Rado Rakotondrabe, Josia Razafindramanana, Jonah Ratsimbazafy, and Tony King "A Preliminary Assessment of Sifaka (Propithecus) Distribution, Chromatic Variation and Conservation in Western Central Madagascar," Primate Conservation 2014(28), 43-53, (1 December 2014). https://doi.org/10.1896/052.028.0116
Received: 1 November 2011; Published: 1 December 2014
JOURNAL ARTICLE
11 PAGES


Share
SHARE
KEYWORDS
Eulemur mongoz
Eulemur rufus
gene flow
melanism
Propithecus coquereli
Propithecus coronatus
Propithecus deckenii
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top