Open Access
Translator Disclaimer
1 January 2020 A new species of Oochoristica (Cyclophyllidea, Anoplocephalidae) from Varanus albigularis (Squamata, Varanidae) in Kenya
Jean Mariaux, Ian Beveridge
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Oochoristica varanicola sp. nov. (Anoplocephalidae, Linstowiinae) is described from Varanus albigularis in Kenya. It is the third species of this cestode genus described from monitor lizards. Oochoristica varanicola differs from other species from Varanus, as well as from the numerous other species in the genus by a unique combination of characters that include a high number of testes (92–134) and a long cirrus-sac (225–290 × 63–90 µm). Both the host and the locality are new records for the genus Oochoristica.

INTRODUCTION

Herein we describe a new cestode from the white-throated monitor Varanus albigularis (Daudin, 1802), collected south of Lake Turkana in the Rift Valley Province of Kenya. Species of Oochoristica Lühe, 1898 are commonly encountered in reptiles worldwide and about 100 species are presently known (McAllister & Bursey, 2017). Only a very few have, however, been reported from monitor lizards.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This material was given to us by Dr M. Jirků (České Budějovice, Czech Republic) who collected it during fieldwork in the Lake Turkana area in 2006. A single V. albigularis, killed by a cobra, was examined. After dissection, the worms were relaxed in physiological saline, then fixed in hot 4% formaldehyde, and finally transferred to 70% ethanol. They were stained in Mayer's hydrochloric carmine, dehydrated in an ethanol series, cleared in eugenol and mounted in Canada balsam. The slides were examined with a Nikon Eclipse-80i microscope equipped with Nomarski interference contrast optics. Drawings were made with a drawing tube. Photographs were taken on the same microscope with a Jenoptik camera and treated with Progres Gryphax 1.1.8 software©. All measurements are expressed in micrometers unless otherwise indicated. Metric and meristic values are presented as the range followed by their mean and the number of measurements made in parentheses.

Abbreviations. MHNG-PLAT: Natural History Museum of Geneva, Platyhelminthes collections. BMNH: British Museum (Natural History), London.

TAXONOMIC PART

Oochoristica varanicola sp. nov.
Figs 1-5

  • Material examined

  • Holotype: MHNG-PLAT-124881; 1 complete specimen. Host: Varanus albigularis (Daudin, 1802), Varanidae, Squamata. Site: Small intestine. Locality: About 20 km North of South Horr, Marsabit County, Kenya. 2 16 32.91°N 36 53 6.07°E. Date: 2006. Collector: Miloslav Jirků. Field number: MJ-C-6-06.

  • Paratypes: MHNG-PLAT-124882; 5 complete specimens. Collection data as for holotype.

  • Comparative material: MHNG-PLAT-45464; Oochoristica rostellata Zschokke, 1905 from Cerastes cornutus Boulenger, 1896, Bou Saâda, Algeria, 5.1926. MHNG-PLAT-45463; Oochoristica rostellata from a colubrine snake, Algeria, 1935. BMNH 1919.11.22.17-19; Oochoristica zonuri Baylis, 1919 from Cordylus tropidosternum (Cope, 1869) (=Zonurus tropidosternum Cope, 1869), Mozambique (“Portuguese East Africa”), type material. MHNG-PLAT-41351 and 41352; Oochoristica cryptobothrium (von Linstow, 1906), from Chrysopelea ornata (Shaw, 1802), Kurunegala, Sri Lanka, syntypes. BMNH 1977.11.3.15-16; Oochoristica cryptobothrium from a lizard from Accra, Ghana.

  • Etymology: The species name refers to generic name of the host.

  • Description

  • Cyclophyllidea: Anoplocephalidae. Body small, up to 12.3 mm long. Average width about 1.5 mm, maximum width 1.8 mm at level of early gravid proglottides. Up to 182 proglottides. Proglottides acraspedote, wider than long, becoming square at postmature level and progressively elongating to about 1.5 to 1.7 times longer than wide when fully gravid. Scolex rounded, massive, not delineated from neck, 670-800 (736, n=6) in diameter (Fig. 1). Suckers rounded to oval 250-310 × 205-270 (286 × 237, n=24) strong, muscular, unarmed. Rostellar apparatus lacking. Proglottization distinct about 1.5 mm behind posterior margin of suckers. Genital pores situated in anterior 25-30% of lateral proglottis margin, irregularly alternating, usually in short series, e.g. … 4, 2, 2, 2, 1, 1, 4, 2, …, but occasional long unilateral series possible (up to 13 consecutive pores observed on a single side). Ventral osmoregulatory canals up to 80 wide, connected posteriorly in each proglottis by complex, reticular, transverse anastomosis across testicular field (Fig. 2). Dorsal osmoregulatory canals 11-27 wide, overlying ventral canals. Genital ducts passing between osmoregulatory canals in most proglottides but occasionally also dorsal (all specimens show several proglottides with dorsal genital ducts). Genital atrium large, 80-112 (97, n=31) deep; surrounded by a compact layer of glandular cells. Atrium sometimes evaginating to form crateriform protrusion (observed in gravid proglottides).

  • Testes 92-134 (109, n=27) in number; in one or occasionally two layers, in one continuous posterior field, extending on lateral sides of proglottis to anterior extremity of vitellarium, and antero-porally to posterior level of ovary, often overlapping, or even external to, osmoregulatory canals. External vas deferens convoluted, surrounding proximal extremity of cirrus-sac. Cirrus-sac thick-walled, triangular, widest at its truncated distal extremity, 225-290 × 63-90 (255 × 79, n=56); extending just beyond osmoregulatory canals. Long retractor muscles attached at its proximal tip. Cirrus and internal vas deferens forming several coils. Cirrus unarmed (Fig. 3).

  • Vitellarium central and poral, more or less densely multilobed, often with detached lobes scattered among testes, highly variable in shape. Ovary antero-poral, bilobate, multilobulate, with deeply separated irregular lobules, about 14-20 lobules in total. Seminal receptacle small, elongated between ovarian wings. Vagina opening posteriorly to male pore, runs transversely, parallel to cirrus-sac, but often making curve or loop at mid length of cirrus-sac and often turning sharply anteriorly at level of opening into genital atrium (Fig. 3) surrounded by regular sheath of large rounded cells; sphincter absent.

  • Uterus appearing antero-ventrally and centrally as small cavity, quickly transforming into a discrete labyrinthine, thin-walled network, developing posteriorly to middle of proglottis and progressively disappearing. Eggs developing in parenchyma, and occupying entire median and lateral fields, in one continuous field across many proglottides. Fully developed eggs in large, thin walled capsules, 75-100 (89, n= 35) in diameter; entirely filling terminal gravid proglottides (Fig. 4). Oncospheres 27-36 in diameter (30.5, n=50) surrounded by irregular inner membrane. Central embryonic hooks 18-20 (19, n=27) long; thin with straight blade; lateral hooks shorter 16-18 (17, n=32); inner lateral hooks of lateral pair more massive with stronger guard than outer hooks (Fig. 5).

  • Fig. 1.

    Oochoristica varanicola sp. nov. Scolex. Scale bar: 250 µm.

    img-z2-5_291.jpg

    REMARKS

    Our material belongs to the genus Oochoristica Lühe, 1898, a taxon with a complex history as summarized e.g. in Hughes (1940); Spasskii (1951); Della Santa (1956); Beveridge (1994, 2008); or Masová et al. (2012). The most recent generic diagnosis (Beveridge, 1994) has been subsequently emended by Masová et al. (2012) for a number of minor details as well as removing the acraspedote nature of proglottides as a generic character. This latter character however would imply the synonymy of Mathevotaenia Akhumyan, 1946, whose members are primarily parasites of mammals, with Oochoristica, found essentially in reptiles (although exceptions do exist) (Beveridge, 1994). Although certainly needing investigation, this character is the single feature allowing separation of both genera. We thus consider here the genus Oochoristica sensu Beveridge, 1994, and accept only part of the emendation of Masová et al. (2012) in recognizing that testes can also be lateral to the vitellarium in some species.

    Fig. 2.

    Oochoristica varanicola sp. nov. Mature proglottis. Ventral view. Note the multilobed vitellarium (arrows). Scale bar: 500 µm.

    img-z3-2_291.jpg

    A recent list, including almost 100 valid species of Oochoristica, was provided by McAllister & Bursey (2017), who also listed selected major discriminating characters for these species. In their table, these authors list eight species from the Afrotropical region. To our knowledge no other species in this genus has been described more recently.

    Although the genus is widely diversified in the Squamata, especially in the Lacertilia, only two species of Oochoristica have been reported from Varanidae. Oochoristica varani Nama & Khichi, 1972 was found in Jodhpur (Rajasthan) in “Varanus monitor”, a taxon which does not exist: the authors most likely referring to V. bengalensis (Daudin, 1802) the common local monitor, or, possibly, to V. flavescens (Hardwicke & Gray, 1827) although this species is morphologically quite distinct and would probably have been correctly identified. Oochoristica varani can easily be distinguished from our material by its smaller scolex (270-412 µm) and suckers (150-200 × 140-170 µm), shorter cirrus-sac (140-210 µm) and lower number of testes (40-55) (Nama & Khichi, 1972).

    Oochoristica tuberculata (Rudolphi, 1819) has been reported from a number of lizards, mostly Lacertidae, Scincidae and Agamidae (Della Santa, 1956), but also from V. griseus (Daudin, 1803), in Tunisia (Joyeux, 1923) and in Iran (Dollfus, 1965). Those reports should however be considered with caution as the Tunisian material is composed of a few young specimens that were only tentatively attributed to O. truncata, and the Iranian material is composed of “quelques débris en mauvais état” (several fragments in a poor state (of preservation) that “il est possible que l'on puisse rapporter les débris... à… O. tuberculata” (may possibly be attributed to O. truncata). The presence of this species in Varanus is thus highly questionable. In any case, O. tuberculata clearly differs from our material by its smaller scolex (160-230 µm), smaller suckers (110-140 µm), lower number of testes (20-50), and smaller number of ovarian lobules (4-6) (McAllister & Bursey, 2017).

    Fig. 3.

    Oochoristica varanicola sp. nov. Copulatory organs.

    img-AgbV_291.jpg

    Fig. 4.

    Oochoristica varanicola sp. nov. Eggs in gravid proglottis.

    img-A6d_291.jpg

    Fig. 5.

    Oochoristica varanicola sp. nov. Eggs.

    img-AAe_291.jpg

    Among the other taxa listed by McAllister & Bursey (2017) from Africa, none presents characters close to those observed in our material. The most similar species are O. koubeki Mašová, Tenora & Baruš, 2012, and O. zonuri Baylis, 1919 which possess a cirrus-sac of similar length but far fewer testes and different scolex dimensions. Our observations of the type material of O. zonuri also confirm that the testes extend to the anterior margin of the segment as shown in the original description (Baylis, 1919: fig. 2), which thus excludes this species from Oochoristica sensu Beveridge (1994).

    Our material further differs from most other known species in various hosts and localities because of its rare combination of a long cirrus-sac and high number of testes. The only species showing similar values for both traits are O. bivitellobata Loewen, 1940, O. gracewileyae Loewen, 1940, O. leonregagnonae Arizmendi-Espinosa, Garcia-Prieto & Guillen-Hernandez, 2005 and O. rostellata Zschokke, 1905. Oochoristica bivitellobata was reported from a member of the Teiidae in Kansas, USA. It is a very short worm consisting of only a small number of proglottides, small scolex (396 µm) and suckers (140 µm) and although both its cirrus sac length and testis number ranges overlap that of our material, they remain shorter (165 µm) and fewer (76) on average. The testes are also distinctly posterior, not reaching the lateral sides of the female organs (Loewen, 1940). Oochoristica gracewileyae was found in a rattlesnake in Texas. It also possesses a smaller scolex and suckers (426 µm and 145 × 152 µm respectively). Its cirrus-sac has a distinctive globular proximal extremity and does not extend beyond the excretory canals, and its testes are entirely posterior to the female genital complex (Loewen, 1940). Oochoristica leonregagnonae was reported from an Iguanidae in Mexico. Although similar, its average number of testes (95) is lower, and its cirrus-sac length (180-230 µm) only marginally overlaps that of our material (Arizmendi-Espinosa et al., 2005). Finally, O. rostellata was found in a colubrid snake in Italy (Zschokke, 1905). In its original description, Zschokke (1905) mentioned “2 to 3 rows of testes… each with 16 to 20 testes”, although his figure 3 shows 78 testes. Other metric data are lacking from this description and more recent reports (Baer, 1927; Della Santa, 1956; McAllister & Bursey, 2017) confuse various sources including data from O. cryptobothrium (von Linstow, 1906) that has been synonymized with it by some authors (Baer, 1927). Apparently Zschokke's species was subsequently found in North African snakes by Joyeux (1927), who described a much shorter cirrus-sac than that in our material. Our own observations of this material also confirm a lower number of testes 51-70 (60, n=5).

    Oochoristica cryptobothrium was recognized as a valid species by Spasskii (1951) and McAllister & Bursey (2017) and its suggested synonymy with O. rostellata by Hughes (1940) or Della Santa (1956) have contributed to the great variation in the morphological features reported for this species. Von Linstow's (1906) original description, from a colubrid snake in Sri Lanka, is not sufficient to unambiguously characterize O. cryptobothrium and doubts remain about the validity of this taxon. Characteristics of this species, as summarized in McAllister & Bursey (2017) are based on a redescription of the original specimens provided by Fuhrmann (1927). We studied this material in the Geneva collections and note that although some of Fuhrmann's measurements are correct, major discrepancies, especially the length of the cirrus-sac (we measured 225 to 305 µm) and, to a lesser extent, the number of testes (about 50 to 60) exist. Our observations are approximate as the available material is not well preserved, but they nevertheless allow the separation of O. cryptobothrium from our material on the basis of a significantly lower number of testes. Additional specimens identified as O. cryptobothrium from a lizard from Accra (BMNH 1977.11.3.15-16) and re-examined appear to be O. rostellata. A detailed revision of all of the material currently attributed to O. cryptobothrium and O. rostellata is therefore needed.

    In summary, our morphological observations, together with its geographical origin and host, allow us to conclude that our material from Varanus albigularis in Kenya represents a new species Oochoristica varanicola sp. nov.

    Oochoristica varanicola is only the third (or possibly the second) species of the genus reported from monitor lizards, indicating that they are probably not ideal hosts for these anoplocephalids. Brooks et al. (1999) suggested that species of Oochoristica are highly specific and that their geographical distribution is restricted. Although our results seem to corroborate this assumption, it is difficult to confirm its generality given the limited availability of comparative material.

    We should finally note that, for Oochoristica, like many groups of cestodes lacking rostellar hooks, specific identification relies heavily on a small number of strobilar characters. In the case of Oochoristica, some of them, e.g. testis numbers, are particularly difficult to observe and may often be inaccurate. As records for most species in the genus are scarce, independent verification of this character is problematic. Molecular data are essentially lacking in the group but will undoubtedly help clarify its structure and composition in the future.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    We thank Miloslav Jirků and Tomáš Scholz (České Budějovice) for entrusting this material to us, Andreas Schmitz (Geneva) for providing useful herpetological information and Eileen Harris for access to the collections of The Natural History Museum, London.

    REFERENCES

    1.

    Akhumyan K.S. 1946. [Systematics of the cestode genus Catenotaenia Janicki, 1904]. Gel'mintologicheskii Sbornik, Izdatel'stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR 37–41. [in Russian] Google Scholar

    2.

    Arizmendi-Espinosa M.A., García-Prieto L., Guillén-Hernández S. 2005. A new species of Oochoristica (Eucestoda: Cyclophyllidea) parasite of Ctenosaura pectinata (Reptilia: Iguanidae) from Oaxaca, Mexico. Journal of Parasitology 91: 99–101. Google Scholar

    3.

    Baer J.G. 1927. Monographie des cestodes de la famille des Anoplocephalidae. Bulletin biologique de la France et de la Belgique 10: 1–241. Google Scholar

    4.

    Baylis H.A. 1919. On two new species of the cestode genus Oochoristica from lizards. Parasitology 11: 405–414. Google Scholar

    5.

    Beveridge I. 1994. Family Anoplocephalidae Cholodkowsky, 1902. In : Khalil L.F., Jones A., Bray R.A. (eds). Keys to the cestode parasites of vertebrates, CAB International , Wallingford . 315–366. Google Scholar

    6.

    Beveridge I. 2008. Mathevotaenia niuguiniensis n. sp. (Cestoda: Anoplocephalidae: Linstowiinae) from the water-rat Parahydromys asper (Thomas) in Papua New Guinea, with a list of species of Mathevotaenia Akumyan, 1946. Systematic Parasitology 71: 189–198. Google Scholar

    7.

    Brooks D.R., Pérez-Ponce de León G., García-Prieto L. 1999. Two new species of Oochoristica Lühe, 1898 (Eucestoda: Cyclophyllidea: Anoplocephalidae: Linstowiinae) parasitic in Ctenosaura spp. (Iguanidae) from Costa Rica and México. Journal of Parasitology 85: 893–897. Google Scholar

    8.

    Cope E.D. 1869. Seventh contribution to the herpetology of tropical America. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 11: 147–169. Google Scholar

    9.

    Daudin F.M. 1802. Histoire Naturelle, Générale et Particulière des Reptiles. Vol. 3. F. Dufart , Paris , 452 pp. Google Scholar

    10.

    Daudin F.M. 1803. Histoire Naturelle, Générale et Particulière des Reptiles. Vol. 3. F. Dufart , Paris , 439 pp. Google Scholar

    11.

    Della Santa E. 1956. Révision du genre Oochoristica Lühe (Cestodes). Revue suisse de Zoologie 63: 1–113. Google Scholar

    12.

    Dollfus R.P. 1965. Mission Yves-J. Golvan et Jean Rioux en Iran. Cestodes de carnivores, rongeurs, insectivores, reptiles et batraciens. Annales de Parasitologie 40: 61–86. Google Scholar

    13.

    Fuhrmann O. 1927. Brasilianische Cestoden aus Reptilien und Vögeln. Abhandlungen der Senckenbergischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft 40: 389–401. Google Scholar

    14.

    Hardwicke T., Gray J.E. 1827. A synopsis of the species of saurian reptiles, collected in India by Major-General Hardwicke. Zoological Journal, London 3: 213–229. Google Scholar

    15.

    Hughes R.C. 1940. The genus Oochoristica Lühe 1898. American Midland Naturalist 23: 368–381. Google Scholar

    16.

    Joyeux C. 1923. Recherches sur la faune helminthologique africaine. Archives de l'Institut Pasteur de Tunis 12: 119–167. Google Scholar

    17.

    Joyeux C. 1927. Recherches sur la faune helminthologique algérienne (Cestodes et Trématodes). Archives de l'Institut Pasteur d'Algérie 5: 509–528. Google Scholar

    18.

    von Linstow O.F.B. 1906. Helminths from the collection of the Colombo Museum. Spolia Zeylandica 3: 163–188. Google Scholar

    19.

    Loewen S.L. 1940. On some reptilian cestodes of the genus Oochoristica (Anoplocephalidae). Transactions of the American Microscopical Society 59: 511–518. Google Scholar

    20.

    Lühe M. 1898. Oochoristica nov. gen. Taeniadarum. Zoologischer Anzeiger 21: 650–652. Google Scholar

    21.

    Mašová S., Tenora F., Baruš V. 2012. Oochoristica koubeki n. sp. (Cestoda, Anoplocephalidae) from African Chamaeleo senegalensis (Chamaeleonidae) and emendation of the genus Oochoristica Lühe, 1898. Helminthologia 49: 27–32. Google Scholar

    22.

    McAllister C.T., Bursey C.R. 2017. A new species of Oochoristica (Cyclophyllidea: Linstowiidae) from nonnative Mediterranean geckos, Hemidactylus turcicus (Sauria: Gekkonidae), from Texas, USA. Acta Parasitologica 62: 296–305. Google Scholar

    23.

    Nama H.S., Khichi P.S. 1972. On a new species of Oochoristica Lühe, 1898 from Varanus monitor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of India 42B: 240–244. Google Scholar

    24.

    Rudolphi C.A. 1819. Entozoorum synopsis, cui accedunt mantissa duplex et indices locupletissimi. Augusti Rücker , Berolini , 811 pp. Google Scholar

    25.

    Shaw G. 1802. General Zoology, or Systematic Natural History. Vol. 3, part 2. G. Kearsley , Thomas Davison, London : 313–615. Google Scholar

    26.

    Spasskii A.A. 1951. [Anoplocephalate tapeworms of domestic and wild animals]. Essentials of Cestodology, Vol. 1. Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Moscow , 783 pp. (in Russian). Translation: Birro A., Cole Z.S. 1963. Israel Program for Scientific Translations , JerusalemGoogle Scholar

    27.

    Zschokke F. 1905. Das Genus Oochoristica Lühe. Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche Zoologie 83: 51–67. Google Scholar
    Jean Mariaux and Ian Beveridge "A new species of Oochoristica (Cyclophyllidea, Anoplocephalidae) from Varanus albigularis (Squamata, Varanidae) in Kenya," Revue suisse de Zoologie 126(2), 291-296, (1 January 2020). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3463469
    Accepted: 15 August 2019; Published: 1 January 2020
    JOURNAL ARTICLE
    6 PAGES


    Share
    SHARE
    KEYWORDS
    Africa
    Cestoda
    Linstowiinae
    monitor lizards
    parasites
    Platyhelminthes
    reptilian hosts
    RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
    Get copyright permission
    Back to Top