Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
18 October 2023 Estimation of demographic fluctuations within a reproductive roost of Pipistrellus kuhlii inferred from capture-mark-recapture data
Alessandro Lago, Raffaella Molteni, Roberto Toffoli, Andrea G. Locatelli
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Despite bats representing one fifth of all mammals, little is known about the ecology and the population status for many species belonging to this order. This is often a consequence of our poor knowledge of population densities and demographic parameters, bats being typically elusive subjects for ecological studies. Capture-mark-recapture studies provide important demographic and ecological data to fill up this information gap. In this study, we monitored animals and gathered data over five years from a reproductive roost of Kuhl's pipistrelle (Pipistrellus kuhlii Kuhl, 1817) located in a Natura 2000 site in north-west Italy. One-hundred-thirty-three individuals were captured and demographic parameters collected, including the annual survival probability for both young and adults, the recapture rates for different sex and age cohorts and the adult population size trend. The influence of environmental variables on the population was also assessed, highlighting the relevant impact of winter temperatures and spring rainfalls on individual survival ability. Notably, our study provides for the first time an estimation of the survival rate of adult females of Kuhl's pipistrelle, a crucial information for future design of studies related to this species' ecology and for informing conservation efforts.

INTRODUCTION

The order Chiroptera includes more than 1400 species (Wilson & Russel, 2019) being one of the major representative taxonomic group of the mammalian clade. Owing to their biological variability and species' richness, bats have an important role for ecosystems health status, functioning both as bioindicators and being directly involved in many ecological functions such as seed dispersal, pollination and pest control (Kasso & Balakrishnan, 2013; Coutts et al., 1973). Despite the economic and environmental benefits deriving from their crucial function within their ecological niche, little is known about bat population status and ecology (Kunz & Fenton, 2005). Bats' nocturnal and elusive habits, coupled with their high vagility, indeed limit data collection from wild animals, negatively impacting on our understanding of their ecology and distribution. Capture-mark-recapture (CMR) data on bat populations represent a valuable tool for addressing this lack of knowledge.

Currently, the development of sophisticated models for the analysis of population dynamics allows to investigate different aspects of a species ecology (Lebreton et al., 1992; Cooch & White, 2001). In the last years, an increasing number of CMR studies were designed to test different ecological hypotheses and to assess important species-specific parameters. This allowed to discover environmental factors negatively affecting the survival of many bat species (Frick et al., 2007), to estimate annual survival rates (Hoyle et al., 2001; Sendor & Simon, 2003; Pryde et al., 2005; Schorcht et al., 2009; Papadatou et al., 2011) and to compare species-specific survival parameters such as growing rates and populational reproductive success (Papadatou et al., 2012). Furthermore, given the exceptional longevity of many species of bats, information on the individuals' annual survival and reproductive rates is a crucial information for the correct design of specific-tailored conservation plans (Prévot-Julliard et al., 1998).

In this work, we describe an analysis of CMR data on a reproductive roost of Kuhl's pipistrelle (Pipistrellus kuhlii Kuhl, 1817) in the north-west of Italy on a five years timespan. Kuhl's pipistrelle is an anthropophilic species frequently found roosting in buildings and other artificial structures (Yom-Tov & Kadmon, 1998; Mendelssohn & Yom-Tov, 1999). Females display high philopatry, returning every year back to the same reproductive roost to give birth to 1-2 pups each (Lanza, 2012). These features allowed the study to be conducted on the same colony over time, returning novel information on the survival capacity and reproductive patterns for the species. Furthermore, the analysis revealed the weight of some environmental factors such as temperatures and precipitations affecting the survival ability of the colony for the reproductive season. Taken together, these results provide new information on a P. kuhlii colony reproductive dynamics and on the survival capacity of adult individuals, specifically females, in relationship with environmental parameters variations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study area and marking procedure

The study area was located inside the Natura 2000 protected area “Riserva naturale della palude di San Genuario” a SACs (IT1120007) in the Vercelli province, Piedmont (Italy). Animals were found roosting in bat boxes placed on the external walls of the natural reserve visitor centre building. Individuals have been captured from summer 2014 to summer 2019, by using telescopic landing nests positioned in the proximity of 3 bat-boxes exit hole. Capture sessions were conducted once every year of the study during summer.

Individuals were marked with a subcutaneous Passive Integrated Transponder (PIT tags) of 0.8 mm length as described in Locatelli et al. (2019), each PIT tag reporting a single alphanumerical identification number. For each animal, forearm length (in mm, sensu Dietz & von Helversen, 2004) and body mass (g) were measured. Animals were classified as young or adults according to the shape and the level of calcification of the phalanx joints (Dietz & von Helversen, 2004). Before each capture session, and every week during summer, a portable PIT tag reader was used to scan the bat box in order to reveal the presence of any marked bats in the roosts, thus allowing to plan the following capture sessions minimising colony disturbance and animal stress.

Capture and handling permits

The capture, handling and marking of the individuals were carried out with all the required permits (Ministero della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare, Aut. Prot. N°: 13040, 26/03/2014). All the main procedural guidelines (Agnelli et al., 2004) were used during animal handling to minimise stress. Some of the fieldwork material and instruments were supplied by Prof. Teeling's lab at University College of Dublin.

Modelling analysis

As previously described, the sampling was carried out over a 5-year timeframe. Presence data collected during the same year were pooled together and treated as from a single sample session. The MARK program was used to conduct two different analyses elaborating the same type of model, the Cormack-Jolly-Seber model (CJS model). The first analysis was carried out by modelling the survival and recapture rate separately. Individuals were grouped in males and females and one-variable (time) basic models were elaborated. The recapture rate was examined considering time and sex with survival using the best basic model. The survival rate was calculated including environmental variables in CJS model without partitioning the population in sex classes. Indeed, Pipistrellus kuhlii tends to form reproductive roost comprising only adult females (Lanza, 2012). Consequently, only a few males were recaptured, thus being not enough to assess an unbiased male survival rate. The environmental variables were selected among those which could be affecting the most bats' annual life cycle such as hibernation and awakening times in winter and spring respectively (Kunz, 1982). Since low temperatures can represent a serious risk to individuals' survival ability, we retained the number of days with a temperature below 0° C as winter length value and we used the average temperature of the coldest month of the year as a proxy for winter severity. Rainy days in spring can also negatively influence individual survive as they can partially impair the foraging activity (Locatelli et al., 2019). Weather data were collected from an open access database (ARPA,  www.arpa.piemonte.it). These data were used to calculate the respective seasonal mean value which were used as covariates for the model.

The second analysis was performed by dividing individuals into two age-cohorts, young and adults respectively. Purpose of the investigation was to compare survival and recapture rates between the two age groups, being young individuals typically characterised by lower survival ability (Sendor & Simon, 2003; O'Shea et al., 2004; Schaub et al., 2007; Papadatou et al., 2009). Since juveniles usually disperse and permanently emigrate from their reproductive roost, the recapture rate was variable among the age cohorts (Hoyle et al., 2001; Pryde et al., 2005; Papadatou et al., 2009; Schorcht et al., 2009). The adult population was estimated each year by dividing the number of adults captured during the summer by the recapture rate calculated for the same timeframe. The goodness of fit (GOF) of data for CJS models was calculated in R by using the “R2ucare” package, which verified if the assumption of CJS model were met with test 2 and 3 (Gimenez et al., 2017). Respectively, the first test examined whether all individuals had the same probability to be captured, challenging the assumption one of the CJS model (i.e. all individuals have the same probability to be captured), while the second test verified if marked individuals had the same probability to survive in a period between time 0 and t+1. In both analyses, GOF was evaluated for both sexes and age-classes (Gimenez et al., 2017).

Model selection was performed based on the AIC criterion by selecting the most parsimonious model (characterised by the lowest AIC score), for each analysis (Burnham & Anderson, 1987).

RESULTS

Capture trend

During the five-year study, 133 individuals were captured (Fig. 1): 27 adults (26 females and 1 male) and 106 juveniles (72 females and 34 males) (Fig. 2). 38 recapture events occurred during the sampling sessions; 13 were adult females, 10 were young females and 1 was a young male. Most of the recaptured bats were also recaptured during following summers (Fig. 3).

Modelling survival and recapture rates

The GOF for CJS models, evaluated for both males (= 1.913; P = 0.167) and females (= 8.949; P = 0.347), showed absence of overdispersion. Models for recapture rate were processed by fitting the survival rate constant, being φ(.) p(.) the best basic model. The best model, selected based on the AIC, involved a recapture rate correlated with the sex of the individual while excluding an annual time effect (Table 1). Starting from this estimate, a model to predict the survival rate was designed. Such analysis did not consider any possible influence of sex on the individual's survival given the extremely low presence of male individuals in maternity roosts after birth. In the first model the survival probability was only influenced by the time covariant. The best fit of data, modelled a constant survival rate for individuals along the years of study (Table 1), thus excluding weather variables. The parameters retained in this model were: φ = 0.69 ± 0.075, 95% CI = 0.53-0.82; pm = 0.05, 95% CI = 0.01-0.18 ± 0.034; pf = 0.38 ± 0.081, 95% CI = 0.24-0.54 (pm= recapture probability of males; pf= recapture probability of females).

Age models and female adult population size

Results from the GOF inferred on the adult population showed that CJS model fits well the general data (= 2.814) while poorly fits for the juvenile subgroup (= 16.383). More tests were elaborated to address this result and understand which assumption had been violated. Both test 2 and test 3 of the “R2ucare” package include other two tests each: test 2ct, test 3sm, test 2cl and test 3sr. Briefly, test 2ct evaluates if the currently captured individuals have the same recapture probability than missed individuals; test 3sr evaluates if newly captured individuals have the same chance to be found in following capture sessions than individuals previously marked; test 3sm and 2cl assess if the time for new and previously captured individuals is the same. Test 3sr was significant (= 15.447, p-value= 0.001), while test 2ct (= 0; p-value= 1), test 3sm (= 0936; p-value= 0.626) and test 2cl (= 0; p-value= 1) were not significant. The model result indicated that juveniles permanently emigrate from the reproductive roost, providing statistical evidence supporting a previously observed behaviour for the species.

Fig. 1.

Number of recapture events during the five years study. The three colours indicate the number of individuals tagged in 2015, 2016 and 2017 respectively. None of the bats tagged in 2018 was recaptured in 2019.

img-z3-18_143.jpg

Fig. 2.

Youngs and adults captured and recaptured for each year. Youngs were considered marked adults after first year.

img-z3-20_143.jpg

Fig. 3.

Number of captured and recaptured individuals for each of the five years. Black columns represent the new individuals captured, grey columns represent the numbers of individuals recaptured.

img-z3-22_143.jpg

Table 1.

Model ranking obtained from the first analysis. ϕ(.) = is set as constant survival during the various years of the study. ϕ(time) = is set with survival ability varying during time. p(g) = recapture probability is set different between sex. p(g+time) = recapture probability is set as different between sex and varying over time with an additive effect between them. p(g*t) = recapture probability is different between sex and varies over time, with an interaction effect between the two variables. p(.) = recapture rate is set constant during the various years of the study. p(t) =recapture rate is set as varying during years.

img-z4-2_143.gif

In the best model, the survival rates for juveniles and adults were constant throughout all the years of the study while the recapture rate varied over time for juveniles only. The juveniles' recapture rates of the last three years of the study were not estimated since limited data were available. The parameters of the best model obtained were: φA= 0.82 ± 0.083, 95% CI= 0.60- 0.93; φJ= 0.19 ± 0.054, 95% CI= 0.11- 0.32; pA= 0.38 ± 0.087, 95% CI= 0.22- 0.55; pJ= 0.51 ± 0.23, 95% CI= 0.15- 0.86 (where φA= adult's survival rate, φJ= juvenile's survival rate; pA= adult's recapture rate; pJ= juvenile's recapture rate). All models elaborated are shown in Table 2 while the trend of the adult population size is reported in Fig. 4.

DISCUSSION

This study provides novel data on female adult population dynamics and survival parameters for Pipistrellus kuhlii. Specifically, this represents the first longitudinal study for the population found in the reserve of San Genuario. Results are coherent with our current knowledge of the species' ecology (Lanza, 2012). Most of the individuals captured were young females. As expected, no adult male was captured, the sampling area being located within a maternity roost (Greenwood, 1980; Lanza, 2012). Intriguingly, fewer male than female juveniles were captured, despite the sex ratio of new-borns is typically 1:1 (Lanza, 2012).

The observed unbalance in the sex ratio of young individuals may arguably been explained by the fact that young males tend to emigrate from the reproductive roost as soon as they learn to fly, usually within the first month of life (Lanza, 2012). Capture sessions were indeed carried out during August - September, when the juveniles were already able to fly. The recapture rate modelled in the first analysis depicts a different use of reproductive roost between the two sexes. The only male recaptured during the five year-observation was a young individual tagged earlier the same summer. A different recapture probability was also observed between young and adult male individuals, indicating the presence of a transience effect, with young males rarely returning to the roost where they were born. Permanent emigration of male juveniles from the maternity roost is indeed a common event among many species of bats (Hoyle et al., 2001; Sendor & Simon, 2003; Papadatou et al., 2009; Schorcht et al., 2009). Some extrinsic factors, such as adult roost switch in the same area, might also have negatively affected these animals' philopatry estimation. Survival rate was modelled based on the recapture data from all individuals. Results indicated a good survival ability of the individuals of the colony studied. Our findings show that weather variables did not exert a strong influence on the population life span as the anthropophilic nature of P. kuhlii allows these animals to find shelter in buildings, therefore decreasing the negative effects of weather conditions on survival (Lanza, 2012). Typically, the number of rainy days negatively affects health condition of Kuhl's pipistrelle (Locatelli et al., 2019) as the foraging activity is perturbed (Audet, 1990). However, for our population the effect of rain was marginal, arguably due to the site-specific characteristics of the foraging area.

Table 2.

Ranking of the age models. Y. = constant juveniles' parameter. A. = constant adult parameter. Y_T = young parameter varying during time. A_T = adult parameter varying during time. p(.)/p(T) = recapture probability equal for two groups.

img-z5-2_143.gif

Fig. 4.

Number of individuals captured over the five years study (grey line) plotted with estimations of adult population size with 95% CI (black line).

img-z5-3_143.jpg

The second analysis explored the most important factors impacting on survival ability among the ones we selected. To avoid biases, the male population was excluded due to low statistical representation. The female survival rate for the studied Kuhl's pipistrelle population was in line with that expected for a long-lived mammalian species, likewise for many other species belonging to the Chiroptera (Yoccoz & Ims, 1999; Schaub & Vaterlaus-Schlegel, 2001). As for the survival rate, the Kuhl's pipistrelle population analysed displayed similar values when compared with those of other European bat species, such as the common pipistrelle (Pipistrellus pipistrellus, 0.80 ± 0.05 survival parameter, SP) and the brown long-eared bat (Plecotus auritus, 0.68 - 0.98 SP) (Papadatou et al., 2011). Coherently, all these species share a comparable body size, diet and ecological plasticity (especially for the species belonging to the genus Pipistrellus which are characteristically anthropophilic), all factors contributing in increasing survival rates (Lanza, 2012; Fisher et al., 2012). Finally, the survival rates for these species are also higher than in other migrating species (e.g. Leisler's bat, Nyctalus leisleri, 0.73-0.76 SP), suggesting they might benefit from not consuming energy in long distance flights or from being less exposed to predation or other ecological factors associated with the different environmental niche. A stationary life paired with a well sheltered hibernation strategy seems to be a good survival strategy for these European bat species.

As expected, the survival rate in juveniles was remarkably lower compared to the same observed for adult females. Even when accounting for underestimation biases deriving from the transient effect, the observed low survival rate of young individuals could be linked with inexperience and more difficulties in tackling threats such as predation and harsh winter condition (Sendor & Simon, 2003). Finally, since the studied population often switched roost within the study area, some of the tagged individuals were probably not detected in all capture sessions, leading to an underestimation of recapture rates and, consequently, an overestimation of adult population size.

Overall our data suggest that Kuhl's pipistrelle has a great survival capacity, likely thanks to its small body size, diet variety and stationary-philopatric habits. The anthropophilic attitude is also an advantage for the species to tackle adverse winter condition and other extrinsic mortality threats such as predators' attack. The estimation of recapture parameters allows to better understand the ethology of the species in maternity roosts and model both the movements of juveniles from these sites and female adults' philopatry. Our data reportedly indicate the roosts harboured in the San Genuario reserve as crucial reproductive sites for the species, being characterised by high annual fidelity by many pregnant females as an elective area to give birth to pups.

Other population studies might be designed in nearby sites used by the species to better understand the health condition of Pipistrellus kuhlii in the area and assess yearly weather variation on the species survival ability.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Thanks to P. Culasso and all the volunteers of the Chirosphera association for helping with the capture sessions and the “Aree Protette Po piemontese” park for allowing the access to the park's structures and facilities. Thanks to Jacopo Cecere and Giovanni Boano for their important advices on data analysis and to Eleonora Roggero for her valuable support throughout the study.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited (see  https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

AUTHORS CONTRIBUTIONS

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by AL, RT and AGL. The first draft of the manuscript was written by AL and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All author read and approved the final manuscript.

REFERENCES

1.

Agnelli P., Martinoli A., Patriarca E., Russo D., Scaravelli D., Genovesi P. 2004. Linee Guida per il monitoraggio dei Chirotteri: indicazioni metodologiche per lo studio e la conservazione dei pipistrelli in Italia. Quaderni di Conservazione della Natura, Ministero Ambiente – Istituto Nazionale Fauna Selvatica 19: 217 pp. Google Scholar

2.

Audet D. 1990. Foraging behavior and habitat use by a gleaning bat, Myotis myotis (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). Journal of Mammalogy 71(3): 420–427. https://doi.org/10.2307/1381955 Google Scholar

3.

Burnham K.P., Anderson D.R., White G.C., Brownie C., Pollock K.H. 1987. Design and analysis methods for fish survival experiments based on release–recapture. American Fish Society. Monograph5. https://doi.org/10.2307/2289733 Google Scholar

4.

Cooch E., White G. 2001. A Gentle Introduction (2nd edition), Program MARK. Analysis of data from marked individuals.  http://www.phidot.org/software/mark/docs/book Google Scholar

5.

Coutts R.A., Fenton M.B., Glen E. 1973. Food intake by captive Myotis lucifugus and Eptesicus fuscus (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). Journal of Mammalogy 54(4): 985–990. https://doi.org/10.2307/1379098 Google Scholar

6.

Dietz C., Von Helversen O. 2004. Illustrated identification key to the bats of Europe. Electronic publication, Tuebingen and Erlangen, 37 pp. Google Scholar

7.

Fischer J.D., Cleeton S.H., Lyons T.P., Miller J.R. 2012. Urbanization and the predation paradox: the role of trophic dynamics in structuring vertebrate communities. BioScience 62(9): 809–818. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2012.62.9.6 Google Scholar

8.

Frick W.F., Rainey W.E., Pierson E.D. 2007. Potential effects of environmental contamination on Yuma Myotis demography and population growth. Ecological Applications 17: 1213–1222. Google Scholar

9.

Gimenez O., Lebreton J.D., Choquet R., Pradel R. 2017. R2ucare: An R package to perform goodness-of-fit tests for capture-recapture models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 9: 1749–1754. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.13014Google Scholar

10.

Greenwood P.J. 1980. Mating systems, philopatry and dispersal in birds and mammals. Animal behaviour 28(4): 1140–1162. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-3472(80)80103-5 Google Scholar

11.

Hoyle S.D., Pople A.R., Toop G.J. 2001. Mark–recapture may reveal more about ecology than about population trends: demography of a threatened ghost bat (Macroderma gigas) population. Austral Ecology 26(1): 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2001.01092.pp.x Google Scholar

12.

Kasso M., Balakrishnan M. 2013. Ecological and economic importance of bats (Order Chiroptera). ISRN Biodiversity 2013: 2356–7872. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/187415 Google Scholar

13.

Kunz T.H. 1982. Roosting ecology of bats (pp. 1–55). In: Kunz T.H. (Ed.). Ecology of Bats. Plenum Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3421-7_1 Google Scholar

14.

Kunz T.H., Fenton M.B. 2005. Bat ecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 798 pp. Google Scholar

15.

Lanza B. 2012. Fauna d'Italia: Mammalia 5. Chiroptera. Calderini, Milano, 800 pp. Google Scholar

16.

Lebreton J., Burnham K.P., Clobert J., Anderson D.R. 1992. Modeling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animals: a unified approach with case studies. Ecological Monographs 62(1): 67–118. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937171 Google Scholar

17.

Locatelli A.G., Ciuti S., Presetnik P., Toffoli R., Teeling E.C. 2019. Long-term monitoring of the effects of weather and marking techniques on body condition in the Kuhl's pipistrelle bat, Pipistrellus kuhlii. Acta Chiropterologica 21(1): 87–102. https://doi.org/10.3161/15081109acc2019.21.1.007 Google Scholar

18.

Mendelssohn H., Yom-Tov Y. 1999. A report of birds and mammals which have increased their distribution and abundance in Israel due to human activity. Israel Journal of Zoology 45: 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00212210.1999.10688975 Google Scholar

19.

O'Shea T.J., Ellison L.E., Stanley T.R. 2004. Survival estimation in bats: historical overview, critical appraisal, and suggestions for new approaches (pp. 297–336). In: Thompson W. L. (Ed.). Sampling rare or elusive species: concepts, designs, and techniques for estimating population parameters. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar

20.

Papadatou E., Butlin R.K., Pradel R., Altringham J.D. 2009. Sex-specific roost movements and population dynamics of the vulnerable long-fingered bat, Myotis capaccinii. Biological Conservation 142(2): 280–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.10.023 Google Scholar

21.

Papadatou E., Ibáñez C., Pradel R., Juste J., Gimenez O. 2011. Assessing survival in a multi-population system: a case study on bat populations. Oecologia 165(4): 925–933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-010-1771-5 Google Scholar

22.

Papadatou E., Pradel R., Schaub M., Dolch D., Geiger H., Ibañez C., Kerth G., Popa-Lisseanu A., Schorcht W., Teubner J., Gimenez O. 2012. Comparing survival among species with imperfect detection using multilevel analysis of mark-recapture data: a case study on bats. Ecography 35(2): 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.07084.x Google Scholar

23.

Prévot-Julliard A.C., Lebreton J.D., Pradel R. 1998. Revaluation of adult survival of black-headed gulls (Larus ridibundus) in presence of recapture heterogeneity. The Auk 115(1): 85–95. https://doi.org/10.2307/4089114 Google Scholar

24.

Pryde M.A., O'Donnell C.F.J., Barker R.J. 2005. Factors influencing survival and long-term population viability of New Zealand long-tailed bats (Chalinolobus tuberculatus): implications for conservation. Biological Conservation 126(2): 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.05.006 Google Scholar

25.

Schaub M., Vaterlaus-Schlegel C. 2001. Annual and seasonal variation of survival rates in the garden dormouse (Eliomys quercinus). Journal of Zoology 255: 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952836901001133 Google Scholar

26.

Schaub M., Gimenez O., Sierro A., Arlettaz R. 2007. Use of integrated modelling to enhance estimates of population dynamics obtained from limited data. Conservation Biology 21(4): 945–955. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00743.x Google Scholar

27.

Schorcht W., Bontadina F., Schaub M. 2009. Variation of adult survival drives population dynamics in a migrating forest bat. Journal of Animal Ecology 78(6): 1182–1190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01577.x Google Scholar

28.

Sendor T., Simon M. 2003. Population dynamics of the pipistrelle bat: effects of sex, age and winter weather on seasonal survival. Journal of Animal Ecology 72(2): 308–320. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2003.00702.x Google Scholar

29.

Wilson D.E., Russel A.M. 2019. The mammals of the world. Vol. 9. Bats. Lynx edition, Barcelona, 1008 pp. Google Scholar

30.

Yoccoz N.G., Ims R.A. 1999. Demography of small mammals in cold regions: the importance of environmental variability. Ecological Bulletin 47: 137–144. Google Scholar

31.

Yom-Tov Y., Kadmon R. 1998. Analysis of the distribution of insectivorous bats in Israel. Diversity and Distribution 4: 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1472-4642.1998.00012.x Google Scholar
Alessandro Lago, Raffaella Molteni, Roberto Toffoli, and Andrea G. Locatelli "Estimation of demographic fluctuations within a reproductive roost of Pipistrellus kuhlii inferred from capture-mark-recapture data," Revue suisse de Zoologie 130(2), 143-149, (18 October 2023). https://doi.org/10.35929/RSZ.0096
Accepted: 3 April 2023; Published: 18 October 2023
KEYWORDS
Bat
Chiroptera
CMR
Kuhl's pipistrelle
population modelling
roost ecology
Back to Top