Evolution remains a controversial issue in the United States, particularly for evangelical Christians, who as a group have been a key player in anti-evolution education legislation. Religious cultural competence can be effective in decreasing undergraduate biology students' perceived conflict between religion and evolution. However, the impact on student populations who are particularly resistant to evolution is unknown. We explored the efficacy of culturally competent evolution education practices adapted for biology students in a genetics course at an evangelical Christian university. This included the presence of an instructor as a religious scientist role model who accepts evolution, and the use of the book The Language of God. We explored how this curriculum affected students' conceptions of religion and evolution using pre- and post-surveys. We found a differential impact of the curriculum: 31% of the students who indicated that there was a conflict between their religious beliefs and evolution changed their conceptions to be more in line with scientific evidence, but the remaining 69% did not. We describe reasons why, including students' perceptions of The Language of God. This research indicates the challenges of implementing culturally competent evolution education for evangelical students, given their strong commitment to biblical literalism and their lower likelihood of being convinced by scientific evidence for evolution.
How to translate text using browser tools
19 March 2020
Differential Impacts of Religious Cultural Competence on Students' Perceived Conflict with Evolution at an Evangelical University
M. Elizabeth barnes,
Ruth Werner,
Sara E. Brownell
ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE
It is not available for individual sale.
This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
It is not available for individual sale.
<
Previous Article
|
![](/ContentImages/journals/ambt/82/2/2/WebImages/005.082.0200.cover.jpg)
The American Biology Teacher
Vol. 82 • No. 2
February 2020
Vol. 82 • No. 2
February 2020
Christianity
creationism
evangelical
evolution
nature of science
undergraduate