Translator Disclaimer
1 February 2004 UNDERSTANDING EVOLUTION OF PLUMAGES AND OTHER CYCLIC AVIAN LIFE-HISTORY PHENOMENA: ROLE FOR AN IMPROVED MOLT TERMINOLOGY
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Birds show quite distinct changes in both external and internal appearance. An evolutionary interpretation of these cyclic life-history phenomena would benefit from a system of description aimed at mapping shared ancestries of arguably the “easiest” of traits: the molts and seasonal plumage changes. By 1959, Humphrey and Parkes had already provided the basis of such a system, but its development and application, especially with regard to the confusing first plumage cycle, by Howell et al. (2003), adds considerably to its power. I hope this leads to an upsurge of evolutionary studies of molt and plumage cycles that in turn provide the basis for analyses of other aspects of the flexible phenotype of birds. With such an increase, the study of molts and plumages could once again be at center stage of avian biology.

Entendiendo la Evolución de los Plumajes y Otros Fenómenos Cíclicos de las Historias de Vida de las Aves: El Papel de una Terminología Mejorada para la Muda

Resumen. Las aves muestran cambios bastante marcados en su apariencia externa e interna. Una interpretación evolutiva de estos fenómenos cíclicos de las historias de vida se beneficiaría de un sistema de descripción dirigido a mapear formas ancestrales compartidas de lo que se podría decir son los caracteres más “fáciles”: las mudas y los cambios estacionales del plumaje. Hacia 1959, Humphrey y Parkes ya habían establecido la base de un sistema de este tipo, pero su desarrollo y aplicación, especialmente con respecto al confuso primer ciclo del plumaje, por parte de Howell et al. (2003) incrementan considerablemente su poder. Espero que esto lleve a un rápido incremento de estudios evolutivos de la muda y los ciclos del plumaje que a su vez provean la base para analizar otros aspectos del flexible fenotipo de las aves. Con un incremento tal, el estudio de la muda y el plumaje podría una vez más ocupar un lugar central en la ornitología.

The appearance of individual birds, with interesting exceptions, changes mainly through the growth of new feathers and their subsequent wear. Although it is the most eye-catching aspect, a changing plumage is only one of the many phenotypic changes shown by most birds in the course of a year (e.g., Murton and Westwood 1977, Gwinner 1986). A comprehensive understanding of the evolution of the highly variable plumages of birds therefore needs consideration of other cyclical aspects of avian life histories (Jacobs and Wingfield 2000), with due attention to the appropriate environmental context. In such an endeavor, the study of plumages seem an obvious place to start, but issues of shared ancestries and homologies provide a real obstacle for progress (Rohwer et al. 1992, Thompson and Leu 1994, Chu 1994, Jukema and Piersma 2000). The nomenclatural system designed by Humphrey and Parkes (1959; the H-P system) was ahead of its time and much underused, especially in the Old World. A revival of studies of the seasonally changing phenotype (e.g., Piersma and Drent 2003) now seems to be under way, so the critical development by Howell et al. (2003) of the H-P system aimed at mapping homologies comes at a good time. Being quite happy with the way in which the H-P system was developed and applied by Howell et al. (2003), I would like to widen the scope of their contribution and discuss how evolutionary studies of plumage variation can provide the basis for comprehensive assessments of the evolution of all cyclical aspects of avian life histories.

Sooner or later any in-depth study of birds has to come to grips with seasonal variation in phenotype, whether external or internal. In my own study on the life histories of long-distance-migrant shorebirds I have come to the realization that almost all phenotypic aspects are seasonally variable, and that this seasonal variability may tell us much about the selection pressures molding the birds' life histories (Piersma 2002, Piersma and Drent 2003). For example, some of the Bar-tailed Godwits (Limosa lapponica) staging in the Netherlands during northward migration show a supplemental molt of rusty-red contour feathers belonging to what was interpreted to be the alternate plumage (Piersma and Jukema 1993). That only individuals with relatively high body masses, complete alternate plumages, and a smaller likelihood of tapeworm infestation (Piersma et al. 2001) showed this supplemental molt, strongly suggested that the rusty-red plumage carried from spring until autumn signaled individual quality and was the outcome of sexual selection on both sexes. In addition, in Bar-tailed Godwits, and also in Ruffs (Philomachus pugnax), sexual selection pressure apparently has been so strong that the extravagant plumage of the breeding season in fact represents a third feather generation counting from the prebasic molt (Jukema and Piersma 2000). The bright new replacement feathers grown by Bar-tailed Godwits on spring staging areas (Piersma and Jukema 1993) count as a fourth.

A less conspicuous, but no less dramatic, seasonal change in avian phenotype was discovered in a study of preen-wax composition of Red Knots (Calidris canutus; Piersma, Dekker, and Sinninghe Damsté 1999). Before northward migration, or just after arrival on the High Arctic breeding grounds, individual Red Knots shift from producing a mix of well-known types of monoester waxes to a novel category of diester waxes (Sinninghe Damsté et al. 2000). We initially interpreted the production of diester waxes as a sexually selected quality signal visible to conspecifics, but subsequent analysis has demonstrated the shift to occur in almost all studied shorebird species, with the tightest correlation (with respect to sexes) with the timing of incubation rather than display and ornamental plumages (Reneerkens et al. 2002). Thus, the production of diester waxes during the breeding season may reflect natural selection (e.g., providing olfactory crypsis) rather than sexual selection.

A final example concerns the strongly variable size of the digestive tract of the Red Knot, a molluscivore that ingests hard-shelled prey whole, crushes the shells in a relatively heavy muscular gizzard and evacuates the shell fragments through the intestine (Battley and Piersma 2004). In the course of the year gizzard size doubles (smallest on the tundra breeding grounds, largest in midwinter), and these size changes can be interpreted as resulting from trade-offs between the capacity for digestive work, diet quality, energy requirements, and savings on maintenance and transport costs (van Gils et al. 2003). These changes may be the outcome of direct demand-supply processes, but strategic reductions in digestive organ size before long-distance flights (Piersma 1998, Piersma and Gill 1998, Piersma, Gudmundsson, and Lilliendahl 1999, Landys-Ciannelli et al. 2003) and gizzard size retention during a long-distance flight (Battley et al. 2000) strongly suggest that seasonal orchestration of organ size by endocrine pathways (Landys-Ciannelli et al. 2002) is also at play.

I now seem to have ventured very far from the issue of detecting homologies in the molts and plumages of birds. But here is my point: for a comprehensive understanding of the variable phenotype of organisms of all kinds, and especially in studies of the evolution of seasonally variable phenotypes, we need a seasonal “template,” a developmentally deep and basic phenotypic trait (or character, see Wagner 2001) that is easy to describe and well suited for intra- and interspecific comparisons. The seasonally changing plumages of birds provide us with such a trait (Wingfield and Jacobs 1999), but to date comparative descriptive studies of molts and plumages have been hampered by the lack of a robust and evolutionarily sensible terminology. In 1959, Humphrey and Parkes provided a good framework. I hope that Howell et al.‘s alteration of the H-P system to facilitate the discovery of homologies, as well as their first categorization of molt strategies of bird families based on annual cycles (their table 1), will induce an upsurge of comparative studies of molt and plumage cycles. I am confident that ornithologists interested in other aspects of the flexible phenotype, and in the endocrine and neural orchestration of this flexibility, will be keen to build on these analyses. This would bring the study of molts and plumages back to the center stage of avian biology.

LITERATURE CITED

1.

P. F. Battley and T. Piersma . 2004. Adaptive interplay between feeding ecology and features of the digestive tract. In J. M. Starck and T. Wang [eds.], Adaptations in food processing and digestion in vertebrates. Science Publishers, Enfield, NH, in press. Google Scholar

2.

P. F. Battley, T. Piersma, M. W. Dietz, S. Tang, A. Dekinga, and K. Hulsman . 2000. Empirical evidence for differential organ reductions during trans-oceanic bird flight. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 267:191–196. Google Scholar

3.

P. C. Chu 1994. Historical examination of delayed plumage maturation in the shorebirds (Aves: Charadriiformes). Evolution 48:327–350. Google Scholar

4.

E. Gwinner 1986. Circannual rhythms. Endogenous annual clocks in the organization of seasonal processes. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. Google Scholar

5.

S. N G. Howell, C. Corben, P. Pyle, and D. I. Rogers . 2003. The first basic problem: a review of molt and plumage homologies. Condor 105:635–653. Google Scholar

6.

P. S. Humphrey and K. C. Parkes . 1959. An approach to the study of molts and plumages. Auk 76:1–31. Google Scholar

7.

J. Jacobs and J. C. Wingfield . 2000. Endocrine control of life-cycle stages: a constraint on response to the environment?. Condor 102:35–51. Google Scholar

8.

J. Jukema and T. Piersma . 2000. Contour feather moult of Ruffs Philomachus pugnax during northward migration, with notes on homology of nuptial plumages in scolopacid waders. Ibis 142:289–296. Google Scholar

9.

M. M. Landys-Ciannelli, T. Piersma, and J. Jukema . 2003. Strategic size changes of internal organs and muscle tissue in the Bar-tailed Godwit during fat storage on a spring stopover site. Functional Ecology 17:151–159. Google Scholar

10.

Castricum Ringing Group, 2002. Baseline and stress-induced plasma corticosterone during long-distance migration in the Bar-tailed Godwit, Limosa lapponica. Physiological and Biochemical Zoology 75:101–110. Google Scholar

11.

R. K. Murton and N. J. Westwood . 1977. Avian breeding cycles. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK. Google Scholar

12.

T. Piersma 1998. Phenotypic flexibility during migration: optimization of organ size contingent on the risks and rewards of fueling and flight?. Journal of Avian Biology 29:511–520. Google Scholar

13.

T. Piersma 2002. Energetic bottlenecks and other design constraints in avian annual cycles. Integrative and Comparative Biology 42:51–67. Google Scholar

14.

T. Piersma, M. H A. Dekker, and J. S. Sinninghe Damsté . 1999. An avian equivalent of make-up?. Ecology Letters 2:201–203. Google Scholar

15.

T. Piersma and J. Drent . 2003. Phenotypic flexibility and the evolution of organismal design. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18:228–233. Google Scholar

16.

T. Piersma and R. E. Gill Jr. . 1998. Guts don't fly: small digestive organs in obese Bar-tailed Godwits. Auk 115:196–203. Google Scholar

17.

T. Piersma, G. A. Gudmundsson, and K. Lilliendahl . 1999. Rapid changes in the size of different functional organ and muscle groups during refueling in a long-distance migrating shorebird. Physiological and Biochemical Zoology 72:405–415. Google Scholar

18.

T. Piersma and J. Jukema . 1993. Red breasts as honest signals of migratory quality in a long-distance migrant, the Bar-tailed Godwit. Condor 95:163–177. Google Scholar

19.

T. Piersma, L. Mendes, J. Hennekens, S. Ratiarison, S. Groenewold, and J. Jukema . 2001. Breeding plumage honestly signals likelihood of tapeworm infestation in females of a long-distance migrating shorebird, the Bar-tailed Godwit. Zoology 104:41–48. Google Scholar

20.

J. Reneerkens, T. Piersma, and J. S. Sinninghe Damsté . 2002. Sandpipers (Charadrii) switch from monoester to diester preen waxes during courtship and incubation, but why?. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 269:2135–2139. Google Scholar

21.

S. Rohwer, C. W. Thompson, and B. E. Young . 1992. Clarifying the Humphrey-Parkes molt and plumage terminology. Condor 94:297–300. Google Scholar

22.

J. S. Sinninghe Damsté, M. H A. Dekker, B. E. van Dongen, S. Schouten, and T. Piersma . 2000. Structural identification of the diester preen-gland waxes of the Red Knot (Calidris canutus). Journal of Natural Products 63:381–384. Google Scholar

23.

C. W. Thompson and M. Leu . 1994. Determining homology of molts and plumages to address evolutionary questions: a rejoinder regarding emberizid finches. Condor 96:769–782. Google Scholar

24.

J. A. van Gils, T. Piersma, A. Dekinga, and M. W. Dietz . 2003. Cost-benefit analysis of mollusc-eating in a shorebird. II. Optimizing gizzard size in the face of seasonal demands. Journal of Experimental Biology 206:3369–3380. Google Scholar

25.

G. P. Wagner [ed.]. 2001. The character concept in evolutionary biology. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. Google Scholar

26.

J. C. Wingfield and J. D. Jacobs . 1999. Innate versus experiential factors regulating the life history cycle of birds. Proceedings of the International Ornithological Congress 22:2417–2443. Google Scholar

Appendices

Theunis Piersma "UNDERSTANDING EVOLUTION OF PLUMAGES AND OTHER CYCLIC AVIAN LIFE-HISTORY PHENOMENA: ROLE FOR AN IMPROVED MOLT TERMINOLOGY," The Condor 106(1), 196-198, (1 February 2004). https://doi.org/10.1650/7460
Received: 8 September 2003; Accepted: 1 September 2003; Published: 1 February 2004
JOURNAL ARTICLE
3 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top