Translator Disclaimer
1 March 2013 Herbicide-Resistant Weeds in the Canadian Prairies: 2007 to 2011
Hugh J. Beckie, Chris Lozinski, Scott Shirriff, Clark. A. Brenzil
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

A late-summer survey of herbicide-resistant (HR) weeds was conducted in Alberta in 2007, Manitoba in 2008, and Saskatchewan in 2009, totaling 1,000 randomly selected annually cropped fields. In addition, we screened 1,091 weed seed samples (each sample from one field) submitted by Prairie growers between 2007 and 2011. Of 677 fields where wild oat samples were collected, 298 (44%) had an HR biotype. Group 1 (acetyl CoA carboxylase inhibitor)-HR wild oat was confirmed in 275 fields (41%), up from 15% in previous baseline surveys (2001 to 2003). Group 2 (acetolactate synthase)-HR wild oat was found in 12% of fields (vs. 8% in 2001 to 2003). Group 8 (triallate, difenzoquat)-HR wild oat was identified in only 8% of fields (not tested in 2001 to 2003); the frequency of occurrence of group 1 2-HR wild oat was similar (8%, vs. 3% in 2001 to 2003). Group 1-HR green foxtail was found in 27% of 209 fields sampled for the weed (vs. 6% in 2001 to 2003). Group 2-HR spiny sowthistle was confirmed in all Alberta fields sampled (vs. 67% in 2001); common chickweed was found mainly in Alberta in 40% of fields (vs. 17% in 2001). Group 2-HR weed biotypes not previously detected in the baseline surveys included false cleavers mainly in Alberta (17% of fields) and Saskatchewan (21%), Powell amaranth in Manitoba (16% of fields), wild mustard (three populations in Saskatchewan and Manitoba), and wild buckwheat (one population in Alberta). No sampled weed populations across the Prairies were found to be resistant to herbicides from group 4 (synthetic auxins), group 9 (glyphosate), or group 10 (glufosinate). Based on the proportion of total field area at each site infested with HR weeds, it is estimated that 7.7 million ha (29% of annually cropped land) are infested with HR weeds (eight-fold increase from 2001 to 2003), in a total field area of 9.9 million ha (37%)—over a two-fold increase. Of 816 cases of HR wild oat identified from submitted samples, 69% were group 1-HR, 15% group 2-HR, and 16% group 1 2-HR. Additionally, there were 10 populations of group 1-HR green foxtail in Saskatchewan or Manitoba, and six populations of group 1-HR Persian darnel in southern Alberta and Saskatchewan. Various group 2-HR broadleaf weeds were identified, including 17 wild mustard populations mainly from Saskatchewan and 39 cleavers populations across the three Prairie provinces. Herbicide-use data from 2006 to 2010 indicated continued reliance on group 1 herbicides in cereal crops and group 2 herbicides in pulse crops.

Nomenclature: Common chickweed, Stellaria media (L.) Vill. STEME; false cleavers, Galium spurium L. GALSP; green foxtail, Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv. SETVI; Persian darnel, Lolium persicum Boiss. & Hohen. ex Boiss. LOLPS; Powell amaranth, Amaranthus powellii S. Wats. AMAPO; spiny sowthistle, Sonchus asper (L.) Hill SONAS; wild buckwheat, Polygonum convolvulus L. POLCO; wild mustard, Sinapis arvensis L. SINAR; wild oat, Avena fatua L. AVEFA.

Un estudio observacional sobre malezas resistentes a herbicidas (HR) se realizó al final del verano en Alberta en 2007, Manitoba en 2008 y Saskatchewan en 2009, para un total de 1,000 muestras aleatoriamente seleccionadas de campos cultivados anualmente. Adicionalmente, evaluamos 1,091 muestras de semillas de malezas (cada muestra proveniente de un campo) remitidas por productores de las Praderas entre 2007 y 2011. De 677 campos donde se colectó muestras de Avena fatua, 298 (44%) tuvieron un biotipo HR. Se confirmó Avena fatua HR grupo 1(inhibidores de acetyl CoA carboxylase) en 275 campos (41%), lo cual fue un incremento del 15% con base en estudios de referencia previos (2001–2003). Se encontró A. fatua HR grupo 2 (acetolactate synthase) en 12% de los c

Hugh J. Beckie, Chris Lozinski, Scott Shirriff, and Clark. A. Brenzil "Herbicide-Resistant Weeds in the Canadian Prairies: 2007 to 2011," Weed Technology 27(1), 171-183, (1 March 2013). https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-12-00095.1
Received: 15 June 2012; Accepted: 28 September 2012; Published: 1 March 2013
JOURNAL ARTICLE
13 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top