Translator Disclaimer
1 May 2016 Growth Stage Influences Mesotrione Efficacy and Fate in Two Bluegrass (Poa) Species
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Mesotrione provides PRE and early POST control of annual bluegrass during Kentucky bluegrass establishment from seed, but applications do not effectively control multitiller plants. The physiological effects of growth stage on efficacy and the basis of mesotrione selectivity between species is not well understood. The objectives of this research were to evaluate mesotrione behavior in these species at three growth stages: pretiller (3 to 5 leaves), 1-tiller, and multitiller (5 to 7 tillers). In greenhouse experiments, a single mesotrione application at 280 g ai ha−1 injured pretiller, 1-tiller, and multitiller annual bluegrass 54, 33, and 11% at 4 wk after initial treatment (WAIT), respectively. A sequential application of mesotrione increased injury to pretiller and 1-tiller annual bluegrass by 20 and 17% from a single treatment, respectively. Sequential mesotrione applications caused at least 14% injury to multitiller annual bluegrass and Kentucky bluegrass at all growth stages and did not reduce tillering compared to the nontreated. Annual bluegrass absorbed 34% more root-applied 14C-mesotrione than Kentucky bluegrass in hydroponic culture, but relative differences (Bq g−1) among growth stages were not detected for both species. Averaged across growth stages, annual and Kentucky bluegrass absorbed 31 and 35% of the applied radioactivity after foliar treatments, respectively. However, averaged across species, multitiller plants metabolized approximately two times more 14C-mesotrione than pretiller and 1-tiller plants. Overall, the selectivity of mesotrione for annual bluegrass control during Kentucky bluegrass establishment results from differential levels of root absorption. Mesotrione has limited efficacy for controlling multitiller annual bluegrass due to enhanced degradation compared to pretiller and 1-tiller plants.

Nomenclature Mesotrione; annual bluegrass, Poa annua L.; Kentucky bluegrass, Poa pratensis L. ‘Midnight'.

Mesotrione brinda control de Poa annua en PRE y POST temprano durante el establecimiento del césped Poa pratensis a partir de semilla, pero las aplicaciones no controlan efectivamente plantas en el estadio de múltiples hijuelos. Los efectos fisiológicos del estadio de desarrollo sobre la eficacia y las bases de la selectividad de mesotrione entre especies no se conocen bien. Los objetivos de esta investigación fueron evaluar el comportamiento de mesotrione en estas especies en tres estadios de desarrollo: pre-hijuelo (3 a 5 hojas), 1-hijuelo, y múltiples hijuelos (5 a 7 hijuelos). En experimentos de invernadero, una aplicación sencilla de mesotrione a 280 g ai ha−1 dañó P. annua en el estadio de pre-hijuelo, 1-hijuelo, y múltiples hijuelos 54%, 33, y 11% a 4 semanas después del tratamiento inicial (WAIT), respectivamente. Una aplicación secuencial de mesotrione aumentó el daño a P. annua en los estadios pre-hijuelo y 1-hijuelo en 20 y 17%, en comparación con el tratamiento sencillo, respectivamente. Las aplicaciones secuenciales de mesotrione causaron al menos 14% de daño a P. annua en el estadio de múltiples hijuelos y al césped P. pratensis en todos los estadios de desarrollo, y no redujo la producción de hijuelos al compararse con el testigo sin tratamiento. P. annua absorbió 34% más 14C-mesotrione aplicado a la raíz que P. pratensis en un cultivo hidropónico, pero diferencias relativas (Bq g−1) entre los estadios de desarrollo no fueron detect

Kentucky bluegrass is the most widely planted species for lawns, sports fields, and other recreational areas. A significant challenge for establishing Kentucky bluegrass from seed is the germination of annual bluegrass. This weed exhibits competitive growth with Kentucky bluegrass that often compromises turf establishment (Beard 1970). Mature annual bluegrass is unsightly, and has poor tolerances to heat, disease, and traffic stress (Beard 1970; Lush 1989). Thus, controlling annual bluegrass during Kentucky bluegrass establishment is critical for long-term successful culture.

Ethofumesate is a lipid biosynthesis inhibitor that can be applied for PRE and POST control of annual bluegrass in Kentucky bluegrass (Anonymous 2014). However, applications are injurious to Kentucky bluegrass seedlings, and provide erratic levels of annual bluegrass control (Anonymous 2014; Dickens 1979; Johnson et al. 1989). Amicarbazone is a Photosystem II inhibitor that provides POST annual bluegrass control in Kentucky bluegrass (Anonymous 2012). Fall applications can excessively injure Kentucky bluegrass and the herbicide is not recommended during establishment (McCullough et al. 2010). Primisulfuron-methyl is an acetolactate synthase inhibitor that effectively controls annual bluegrass in Kentucky bluegrass (Hart and McCullough 2007a; McCullough et al. 2015) and the herbicide has a 24(c) label in several states with limited annual use rates of no more than 40 g ai ha−1 (Anonymous 2006).

Mesotrione is a carotenoid biosynthesis inhibitor used before, during, and after Kentucky bluegrass establishment (Dernoeden et al. 2008). Mesotrione inhibits the 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD) enzyme that converts tyrosine to plastoquinone and α-tocopherol in carotenoid biosynthesis (Beaudegnies et al. 2009). Susceptible species exhibit foliar bleaching followed by tissue necrosis from free radical damage to cell membranes (Lee et al. 1999; McCurdy et al. 2009). Kentucky bluegrass seedlings are tolerant to mesotrione, and applications effectively control winter annual weeds during fall establishment. In New Jersey, sequential mesotrione applications at 280 g ai ha−1 controlled annual bluegrass greater than 80% after seeding Kentucky bluegrass (Hart and McCullough 2007b). In Iowa, annual bluegrass control from sequential mesotrione applications at 190 g ha−1 provided at least 90% ground cover of Kentucky bluegrass by the following year (Hoiberg and Minner 2010).

Although mesotrione provides PRE and early POST control of annual bluegrass, efficacy is significantly reduced when applied to mature annual bluegrass. Multiple applications of mesotrione in the fall provided inconsistent levels of annual bluegrass control across locations and years (Reicher et al. 2011). Skelton et al. (2012) also reported erratic control following mesotrione at 110 or 186 g ha−1 applied POST five and three times in Kentucky bluegrass, respectively. The researchers noted that ten applications of mesotrione at 56 g ha−1 controlled annual bluegrass at least 85%, but Kentucky bluegrass injury was unacceptable (> 20%).

Mesotrione effectively controls immature annual bluegrass, but applications are less effective for controlling multitiller plants. Conversely, mesotrione causes negligible injury at labeled use rates on Kentucky bluegrass immediately after seeding and at all stages of growth. The differential behavior of mesotrione in these two bluegrass species is not well understood and the effects of growth stage on annual bluegrass tolerance have received limited investigation. The objectives of this research were to evaluate the efficacy, absorption, translocation, and metabolism of mesotrione in annual bluegrass and Kentucky bluegrass at three growth stages.

Materials and Methods

Plant Material. Experiments were conducted at the University of Georgia in Griffin, GA. ‘Midnight' Kentucky bluegrass (Preferred Seed, Buffalo, NY 14227) and annual bluegrass were seeded in 3.8-cm-diam by 20-cm-deep pots in a greenhouse set for 23/17 C (day/night). Annual bluegrass seed was collected from seedheads of indigenous populations in Griffin, GA. Soil was a mixture of sand and peat moss (80 : 20 v/v). Grasses received fertigation biweekly (MacroN 28-7-14 Sprayable Fertilizer, LESCO Inc., Cleveland, OH 44114) and were watered as needed to promote growth. Plants were selected based on growth stage including: 3- to 5-leaf stage (pretiller), 1-tiller, and 5- to 7-tiller (multitiller).

Greenhouse Experiments. Experiments were conducted to evaluate injury and tillering of annual and Kentucky bluegrass at three growth stages following single or sequential mesotrione applications. Annual bluegrass and Kentucky bluegrass at the three growth stages were treated with single or sequential applications of mesotrione (Tenacity 4SC, Syngenta Crop Protection, Greensboro, NC 27419) at 280 g ha−1. A nonionic surfactant (Activator 90, Loveland Products, Inc., Greeley, CO 80632) at 0.25% v/v was included in the herbicide treatments. A nontreated check for all growth stages was included. Treatments were applied with a CO2-pressured sprayer calibrated to deliver 374 L ha−1 with a single 9504E flat-fan nozzle (TeeJet Spraying Systems, Co., Roswell, Ga 30075). The sequential treatment was applied at 2 wk after initial treatment (WAIT). Grasses were not irrigated for 24 h after treatments (HAT), but received irrigation thereafter to prevent moisture stress. Injury was visually evaluated at 2 and 4 WAIT on a percent scale where 0 equaled no injury and 100 equaled complete desiccation. Tillers were counted at 2 and 4 WAIT.

Root Absorption and Translocation. Experiments were conducted to investigate root absorption of 14C-mesotrione and radioactivity translocation in annual and Kentucky bluegrass at three growth stages. Plants were removed from greenhouse pots, roots were rinsed to remove soil, and plants were grown hydroponically in a 10-L plastic tank filled with a quarter-strength Hoagland solution (Hoagland and Arnon 1950). Grasses were placed through holes in the plastic lid that facilitated root submergence in the solution. The tank was covered with aluminum foil to shield roots from light and placed in a growth chamber (Percival Scientific, Inc. 505 Research Drive, Perry, IA 50220) set for 24/14 C (day/night) with a 12 h photoperiod of 350 μmol m−2 s−1. An aquarium pump was used to provide oxygen to the solution and plants were acclimated to hydroponic culture in the growth chamber for 72 h. This acclimation period and nutrient load were chosen for plants to resume active growth in hydroponic solution without stimulating development beyond the target growth stage.

The solution of the tank was then spiked with 170 kBq of 14C-mesotrione (109 μCi mg−1, phenyl-ring labeled, 99% chemical purity) plus 1 μM of nonlabeled mesotrione. Plants were harvested 72 HAT. Roots were rinsed for 20 s under a stream of tap water and blotted dry with paper towels. Roots were then separated from shoots with shears and samples were oven-dried for 7 d at 40 C. Samples were then oxidized for 2 min in a biological oxidizer (OX-500, R. J. Harvey Instrument Corp., 11 Jane St., Tappan, NY 10983) and radioactivity was quantified with liquid scintillation spectroscopy (LSC) (Beckman LS 6500®, Beckman Coulter Inc., Fall River, MA 02720). Root absorption was determined by dividing the radioactivity recovered by sample dry weight. Translocation was determined by dividing the 14C recovered in shoots by the total radioactivity in the plant (roots and shoots).

Foliar Absorption, Translocation, and Metabolism. Experiments were conducted to evaluate foliar uptake, translocation, and metabolism of 14C-mesotrione in annual and Kentucky bluegrass at three growth stages. Plants were established in greenhouse pots as previously described and acclimated in the aforementioned growth chamber for 72 h. Grasses were prepared for radiolabeled treatments by covering the second, fully expanded leaf with flexible film (Parafilm, Bemis Company Inc., Neenah, WI 54956). A broadcast treatment of mesotrione at 280 g ha−1 was applied as previously described. Immediately after the broadcast application, two 1 μL droplets of 14C-mesotrione containing 1.3 kBq each were applied to the second fully expanded leaf with a 10 μL microsyringe (Hamilton Co., Reno, NV 89502). Radioactive droplets were applied in the middle of the leaf and to the sides of the midrib. The spotting solution contained 0.75μg μL−1 of mesotrione to simulate droplets of spray solution. A nonionic surfactant at 0.25% v/v was added to the broadcast and radioactive solutions to facilitate droplet deposition on the leaf surface.

Plants (roots and shoots) were harvested 6 d after treatment (DAT). This harvest timing was chosen from previous research with 14C-mesotrione (Abit and Al-Khatib 2009; Armel et al. 2005) and from pilot experiments that indicated turfgrasses require at least 3 d to show significant levels of metabolism (PE McCullough, personal observation). The treated leaf was excised and then rinsed with 10 ml of methanol inside a 20-ml scintillation vial. The base of the leaf was held with forceps and rinsate was applied towards the leaf tip with a 5-ml pipette on the leaf surface. This methodology was chosen from pilot experiments that completely removed adsorbed 14C immediately after treatment and previous research with 14C-mesotrione on grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench.] (Abit and Al-Khatib 2009). Roots were then separated from nontreated shoots with shears and samples were stored at −20 C until analysis.

The treated leaf and nontreated parts (nontreated shoots and roots) were minced and homogenized separately in 20 ml of methanol (FSH 125, Fisher Scientific LLC, 300 Industry Drive, Pittsburg, PA 15275) for 30 s. Samples were then sonicated in water for 8 h at room temperature, centrifuged for 10 min, and the supernatant was transferred to separate tubes. This procedure was repeated with an additional 20 ml of methanol and the supernatants were combined. Plant residue was then placed in water sonication for approximately 6 h in 20 ml of methanol plus 1% formic acid, centrifuged, and the supernatants were combined. Radioactivity of the supernatant for the treated leaf and the rest of the plant were quantified from 4-ml aliquots using LSC. Residue was dried for 72 h in the hood and then combusted in the oxidizer to quantify extraction efficiency. The supernatant from the treated leaf and nontreated parts were then combined to evaluate whole plant metabolism.

The supernatant was then evaporated in a forced-air hood. Samples were resuspended in 40 μL of methanol and spotted on 20- by 20-cm thin layer chromatography (TLC) plates. The TLC plates were developed to 16 cm in a glass chamber using chloroform:methanol (1 : 9). The plates were air-dried and metabolites were detected with a radiochromatogram scanner (BioScan System 200 Imaging Scanner, Bioscan, 4590 MacArthur Boulevard NW, Washington, DC 20007) connected to a computer equipped with Laura Chromatography Data Collection and Analysis Software® (LabLogic System, Inc. 1040 E Brandon Blvd Brandon, FL 33511).

Residue from the treated leaf and nontreated parts were oxidized separately for 2 min in a biological oxidizer and radioactivity was quantified with LSC. Foliar absorption was quantified by dividing the total radioactivity recovered in the supernatant and residue by the total 14C applied. Translocation was determined by dividing the total radioactivity recovered in nontreated shoots and roots from the total radioactivity recovered in the plant.

Experimental Design and Data Analysis. The design for the greenhouse experiment was a randomized complete block with five replications. The design for all laboratory experiments was completely randomized with five replications. Two runs were conducted for all experiments. Data were subjected to analysis of variance using the General Linear Model Procedure in SAS (SAS v. 9.3, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC 27513) and means were separated with Fisher's LSD test at α = 0.05. When experiment-by-treatment interactions were not detected, results were pooled over runs.

Results and Discussion

Greenhouse Experiments. Growth stage-by-treatment interactions were detected for annual bluegrass and Kentucky bluegrass injury; thus, results are presented across all combinations. At 2 WAIT, mesotrione injured annual bluegrass 32, 20, and 15% at the pretiller, 1-tiller, and multitiller growth stage, respectively (Table 1). Kentucky bluegrass was injured no more than 5% at all growth stages. At 4 WAIT, single mesotrione applications injured annual bluegrass 54, 33, and 11% at the pretiller, 1-tiller, and multitiller growth stage, respectively. Sequential applications increased injury 20 and 17% from single treatments on pretiller and 1-tiller annual bluegrass, respectively. The sequential treatment only injured multitiller annual bluegrass 14% at 4 WAIT and was similar to injury from the single application. The sequential treatment injured pretiller Kentucky bluegrass more than tillered plants, but injury did not exceed 12%.

Table 1.

Injury of annual bluegrass and ‘Midnight' Kentucky bluegrass with mesotrione at 280 g ai ha−1 in two greenhouse experiments, Griffin, GA. Results were pooled over experimental runs.

i0890-037X-30-2-524-t01.eps

Growth stage-by-treatment interactions were detected for tiller counts at both dates; thus, results are presented across all combinations. At 2 WAIT, mesotrione reduced annual bluegrass tiller count 32% compared to the nontreated when applied at the 1-tiller growth stage (Table 2), but other growth stages were similar to the nontreated. At 4 WAIT, differences between single and sequential applications were not detected for tiller counts. Mesotrione inhibited tillering of annual bluegrass 58 and 38% compared to the nontreated when applied at the pretiller and 1-tiller growth stage, respectively (Table 2). Mesotrione did not inhibit tillering of multitiller annual bluegrass plants compared to the nontreated. Kentucky bluegrass tillering was not inhibited following single and sequential mesotrione applications at all growth stages 2 and 4 WAIT.

Table 2.

Tiller count for annual bluegrass and ‘Midnight' Kentucky bluegrass treated with mesotrione at 280 g ai ha−1 in two greenhouse experiments, Griffin, GA. Results were pooled over experimental runs.

i0890-037X-30-2-524-t02.eps

Results suggest mesotrione has the greatest efficacy on annual bluegrass prior to reaching a multitiller growth stage. Kentucky bluegrass has superior tolerance to mesotrione compared to annual bluegrass, and treatments did not inhibit tillering from the nontreated at any growth stage. These results support previous observations on the differential tolerance levels of annual bluegrass to mesotrione at various stages of maturity in field experiments (Reicher et al. 2011; Skelton et al. 2012). POST applications of mesotrione at 140 and 210 g ha−1 applied 4 wk after emergence did not reduce Kentucky bluegrass cover from the nontreated (Venner 2011). Similarly, Askew and Beam (2002) reported no injury to Kentucky bluegrass following sequential mesotrione applications. Annual bluegrass injury and growth inhibition from mesotrione would likely give Kentucky bluegrass a competitive growth advantage during seedling establishment.

Mesotrione efficacy for controlling immature annual bluegrass is also consistent with the susceptibility of other weeds at various growth stages. Canada thistle [Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop.] was more susceptible to mesotrione at the rosette stage compared to the bolting stage (Armel et al. 2005). Researchers have also noted that mesotrione efficacy on smooth [Digitaria ischaemum (Schreb.) ex Muhl.] and large crabgrass [D. sanguinalis (L.) Scop.] was reduced on multitiller plants compared to seedlings (McCurdy et al. 2008; Whaley et al. 2006). The effects of growth stage also influence the susceptibility of weeds to other herbicides. For example, Chism et al. (1992) reported that southern crabgrass [Digitaria ciliaris (Retz.) Koel.] at pretiller and two- to four-tiller stages were more susceptible to quinclorac than at the flowering stage. Kells et al. (1984) noted that fluazifop caused greater injury to quackgrass [Elytrigia repens (L.) Desv. ex B.D. Jackson, now Elymus repens (L.) Gould] at 2- to 3-leaf stage than at a 5- to 6-leaf stage.

The tolerance of annual and Kentucky bluegrass to mesotrione at the multitiller stage suggests that applications could be used for selectively controlling other weeds, such as crabgrass (Digitaria spp.), in mixed stands. However, annual bluegrass exhibits significantly more susceptibility to mesotrione prior to tillering, compared to after establishment, and applications could be injurious. The selectivity for controlling pretiller annual bluegrass suggests mesotrione has differential behavior in these species that is influenced by growth stage.

Absorption and Translocation. Species-by-growth stage interaction was not detected for absorption or translocation of root-applied 14C-mesotrione; thus, results are presented by main effect (Table 3). At 72 h of root exposure to nutrient solution containing 14C-mesotrione, annual bluegrass accumulated more 14C in whole plant and shoots per dry weight than Kentucky bluegrass. Annual bluegrass accumulated 479 and 444 Bq g−1, while Kentucky bluegrass accumulated 357 and 332 Bq g−1 in whole plant and shoots, respectively. For both species, differences were not detected for relative absorption (Bq g−1) of 14C-mesotrione in whole plant and shoots among growth stages. For both species, pretiller plants translocated approximately 10% less of the root-absorbed radioactivity to shoots than tillered plants, but differences between species were not detected.

Table 3.

Root absorption and translocation of radioactivity to shoots for annual bluegrass and ‘Midnight' Kentucky bluegrass at 72 h after treatment with 14C-mesotrione in two experiments, Griffin, GA. Results were pooled over experimental runs.

i0890-037X-30-2-524-t03.eps

Uptake and subsequent transport from roots has been attributed to the selectivity of other herbicides for annual bluegrass control in turfgrass. For example, annual bluegrass had greater root absorption of 14C-amicarbazone than creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.) and tall fescue [Festuca arundinacea Shreb., now Lolium arundinacea (Schreb.) S. J. Darbyshire] (Yu et al. 2013). In other experiments, annual bluegrass had similar root absorption of 14C-primisulfuron-methyl to Kentucky bluegrass, but the transport of primisulfuron acid to shoots was greater in annual bluegrass due to slower metabolism (McCullough et al. 2015). Soil uptake might be critical for mesotrione selectivity on annual bluegrass seedlings during Kentucky bluegrass establishment. Seeded areas typically take several weeks for Kentucky bluegrass to reach greater than 50% ground coverage, and applications could have minimal spray retention on immature foliage.

Species-by-growth stage interactions were not detected for foliar absorption and translocation after 144 h. Foliar absorption levels averaged 31% (± 1 SEM) and 35% (± 1) of the applied radioactivity for annual and Kentucky bluegrass, respectively, but differences among growth stages were not detected (data not shown). Abit and Al-Khatib (2009) reported no differences in foliar absorption of 14C-mesotrione in tolerant and susceptible sorghum hybrids. Annual bluegrass has exhibited greater foliar uptake of 14C-amicarbazone, 14C-bispyribac-sodium, and 14C-ethofumesate than creeping bentgrass (Kohler and Branham 2009; Lycan and Hart 2006; Yu et al. 2013). Foliar absorption levels of mesotrione might be inconsequential for the selectivity between annual and Kentucky bluegrass.

Research on foliar uptake of mesotrione in grasses at various growth stages is limited. Canada thistle in the rosette stage absorbed 5 to 10% more foliar-applied 14C-mesotrione than at the bolting stage (Armel et al. 2005). The speed of mesotrione uptake was not measured in annual and Kentucky bluegrass due to the number of plants and growth stages that were evaluated. Perhaps annual bluegrass absorbs mesotrione more quickly than Kentucky bluegrass and warrants further investigation.

Species-by-growth stage interaction was not detected for translocation of foliar-absorbed 14C-mesotrione. Annual and Kentucky bluegrass translocated 27 to 32% of radioactivity out of the treated leaf (Table 4). In previous research, the majority of radioactivity was also recovered in the treated leaf of grain sorghum hybrids after 7 d (Abit and Al-Khatib 2009). Annual and Kentucky bluegrass have exhibited similar translocation of 14C-primisulfuron-methyl, despite the differential tolerance levels to applications (McCullough et al. 2015). Researchers have also noted greater translocation of radioactivity from 14C-amicarbazone and 14C-bispyribac-sodium in annual bluegrass compared to creeping bentgrass (Lycan and Hart 2006; Yu et al. 2013). Results suggest that translocation patterns do not explain the selectivity of mesotrione in these bluegrass species.

Table 4.

Translocation of radioactivity for annual bluegrass and ‘Midnight' Kentucky bluegrass at 144 h after foliar-applied of 14C-mesotrione in experiments, Griffin, GA. Results were pooled over experimental runs.

i0890-037X-30-2-524-t04.eps

Tillered grasses translocated 24% of the absorbed radioactivity to nontreated shoots and roots. Pretiller plants translocated 41% of the 14C absorbed, which was greater than both tillered growth stages tested. The efficacy of mesotrione for controlling seedling annual bluegrass could be attributed to translocation after foliar uptake. Armel et al. (2005) noted higher levels of radioactivity translocation from 14C-mesotrione in rosette Canada thistle compared to the bolting stage. Although Kentucky bluegrass had less injury to mesotrione than annual bluegrass, pretiller plants had more injury than tillered plants for both species. Greater translocation following the foliar absorption could contribute to the susceptibility of pretiller plants to mesotrione injury, but results do not explain the differential tolerance levels between species.

Metabolism. Extraction of radioactivity from plants averaged 87% (± 0.6) (data not shown). The Rf of parent mesotrione was 0.7 and two major metabolites were identified in both species at Rf 0.05 and 0.6 after foliar uptake (Figure 1). Growth stage-by-species interaction was not detected for metabolism of 14C-mesotrione. Annual bluegrass and Kentucky bluegrass had similar metabolism of 14C-mesotrione (65 to 68%) (Table 5). This range in mesotrione degradation is similar to previous reports in grain sorghum after 7 d (Abit and Al-Khatib 2009). However, parent herbicide levels in pretiller and 1-tiller plants were approximately two times greater than multitiller plants (40 vs. 21%). Compared to the multitiller stage, pretiller and 1-tiller plants averaged 26% fewer polar metabolites and approximately three times greater nonpolar metabolite levels.

Figure 1.

Radiochromatogram scans of the major metabolites detected in pretiller and multitiller Kentucky bluegrass.

i0890-037X-30-2-524-f01.tif

Table 5.

Metabolism of 14C-mesotrione in annual bluegrass and ‘Midnight' Kentucky bluegrass at 144 h after treatment in two experiments, Griffin, GA. Results were pooled over experimental runs.

i0890-037X-30-2-524-t05.eps

Metabolism was noted as the primary basis for differential response of crops to mesotrione (Abit and Al-Khatib 2009; Ma et al. 2013; Mitchell et al. 2001). Abit and Al-Khatib (2009) reported a tolerant sorghum hybrid metabolized 7% more foliar-absorbed mesotrione compared to a susceptible hybrid. Enhanced metabolism of mesotrione has been reported in corn (Zea mays L.) from cytochrome P450 monooxygenase-mediated detoxification mechanisms (Hawkes et al. 2001). Pataky et al. (2009) reported the mutation of a cytochrome P450 gene, referred to as nsf1 or ben1, resulted in reduced enzyme activity and increased sensitivity of corn to cytochrome P450-metabolized herbicides, including mesotrione and nicosulfuron. Ma et al. (2013) noted corn is naturally tolerant to mesotrione due to a rapid rate of P450-catalyzed ring hydroxylation. This supposition was supported by increased corn injury by mesotrione following the addition of malathion, a cytochrome P450 monooxygenase inhibitor. Perhaps multitiller plants of annual and Kentucky bluegrass have higher concentrations of P450 enzymes than pre- and 1-tiller plants, which contribute to a more rapid degradation of mesotrione. The role of metabolism does not explain the relative differences in tolerance to mesotrione between annual and Kentucky bluegrass.

Mesotrione can be used for selective annual bluegrass control during Kentucky bluegrass establishment from seed. However, efficacy is significantly limited for controlling mature annual bluegrass plants. The selectivity of mesotrione between these species is attributed to differential root-absorption levels. Metabolism is probably inconsequential for mesotrione selectivity between these species, but multitiller annual bluegrass might have greater degradation than pretiller or 1-tiller plants. Further research is needed to analyze differences in the susceptibility levels of HPPD enzymes to inhibition by mesotrione. Research is also warranted to quantify differential levels of uptake between Kentucky bluegrass cultivars with varying levels of susceptibility to mesotrione injury.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Luke Dant and J.R. James from Syngenta for providing radiolabeled mesotrione for this work.

Literature Cited

  1. Abit MJM, Al-Khatib K (2009) Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of mesotrione in grain sorghum. Weed Sci 57:563–566 Google Scholar

  2. Anonymous (2006) Beacon® section 24(C) special local need label. Greensboro, NC: Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. 4 p Google Scholar

  3. Anonymous (2014) Prograss herbicide label. Research Triangle Park: Bayer Environmental Science. 7 p Google Scholar

  4. Anonymous (2012) Xonerate herbicide label. Cary, NC: Arysta LifeScience North America, LLC. 30 p Google Scholar

  5. Armel GR, Hall GJ, Wilson HP, Cullen N (2005) Mesotrione plus atrazine mixtures for control of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Weed Sci 53:202–211 Google Scholar

  6. Askew SD, Beam JB (2002) Weed management in cool-season turf with mesotrione. Page 129 in Proceedings of Northeastern Weed Science Society. Philadelphia, PA: Northeastern Weed Science Society. [Abstract] Google Scholar

  7. Beard JB. (1970) An ecological study of annual bluegrass. U S Golf Assoc Green Sect Rec 8:13–18 Google Scholar

  8. Beaudegnies R, Edmunds AJF, Fraser TEM, Hall RG, Hawkes TR, Mitchell G, Schaetzer J, Wendeborn S, Wibley J (2009) Herbicidal 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase inhibitors—a review of the triketone chemistry story from a Syngenta perspective. Bioorg Med Chem 17:4134–4152 Google Scholar

  9. Chism WJ, Birch JB, and Bingham SW (1992) Nonlinear regressions for analyzing growth stage and quinclorac interactions. Weed Technol 6:898–903 Google Scholar

  10. Dernoeden PH, Kaminski JE, Fu J (2008) Selective creeping bentgrass control in Kentucky bluegrass and tall fescue with mesotrione and triclopyr ester. HortScience 43:509–513 Google Scholar

  11. Dickens R (1979) Control of annual bluegrass (Poa annua L.) in overseeded bermudagrass Cynodon spp. golf greens. Weed Sci 27:642–644 Google Scholar

  12. Hart SE, McCullough PE (2007a) Annual bluegrass (Poa annua) control in Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis) with bispyribac-sodium, primisulfuron, and sulfosulfuron. Weed Technol 21:702–709 Google Scholar

  13. Hart SE, McCullough PE (2007b) Use of mesotrione at cool-season turfgrass establishment for annual bluegrass control.  https://scisoc.confex.com/crops/2007am/techprogram/P36149.HTM. Accessed February 4, 2015 Google Scholar

  14. Hawkes TR, Holt DC, Andrews CJ, Thomas PG, Langford MP, Hollingworth S, Mitchell G (2001) Mesotrione mechanism of herbicidal activity and selectivity in corn. Volume 2. Pages 563–568in BCPC Proceedings—Weeds, British Crop Protection CouncilBrighton, UK: British Crop Protection Council Google Scholar

  15. Hoagland DR, Arnon DI (1950) The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. Berkeley, CA: California Agricultural Experiment Station Circular No. 347. 32 p Google Scholar

  16. Hoiberg AH, Minner DD (2010) Mesotrione reduces presence of annual bluegrass during fairway conversion.  https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/meetings/download/pdf/2010am/57595. Accessed February 4, 2016 Google Scholar

  17. Johnson BJ, Landry GW, Karnok KJ (1989) Tolerance of bentgrass to amount, frequency, and timing of ethofumesate applications. HortScience 24:102–104 Google Scholar

  18. Kells JJ, Meggitt WF, Penner D (1984) Absorption, translocation, and activity of fluazifop-butyl as influenced by plant growth stage and environment. Weed Sci 32:143–149 Google Scholar

  19. Kohler EA, Branham BE (2002) Site of uptake, absorption, translocation, and metabolism of ethofumesate in three turfgrass species. Weed Sci 50:576–580 Google Scholar

  20. Lee DL, Knudsen CG, Michaely WJ, Chin HL, Nguyen NH, Carter CG, Cromartie TH, Lake BH, Shribbs JM, Fraser T (1999) The structure–activity relationships of the triketone class of HPPD herbicides. Pest Manag Sci 54:377–384 Google Scholar

  21. Lush WM (1989) Adaptation and differentiation of golf course populations of annual bluegrass. Weed Sci 37:54–59 Google Scholar

  22. Lycan DW, Hart SE (2006) Foliar and root absorption and translocation of bispyribac-sodium in cool-season turfgrass. Weed Technol 20:1015–1022 Google Scholar

  23. Ma R, Kandun SS, Tranel PJ, Riggins CW, McGinness DL, Hager AG, Hawkes T, McIndoe E, Riechers D (2013) Distinct detoxification mechanisms confer resistance to mesotrione and atrazine in a population of waterhemp. Plant Physiol 163:363–377 Google Scholar

  24. McCurdy JD, McElroy JS, Breeden GK, Kopsell DA (2008) Mesotrione plus prodiamine for smooth crabgrass (Digitaria ischaemum) control in established bermudagrass turf. Weed Technol 22:275–279 Google Scholar

  25. McCurdy JD, McElroy JS, Kopsell DA, Sams CE (2009) Mesotrione control and pigment concentration of large crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis) under varying environmental conditions. Plant Manag Sci 65:640–644 Google Scholar

  26. McCullough PE, Hart SE, Weisenberger D, Reicher ZJ (2010) Amicarbazone efficacy on annual bluegrass and safety on cool-season turfgrasses. Weed Technol 24:461–470 Google Scholar

  27. McCullough PE, Singh R, Czarnota MA, Johnston CR (2015) Primisulfuron-methyl efficacy and fate in annual bluegrass (Poa annua) and Kentucky bluegrass. Weed Sci 63:388–398 Google Scholar

  28. Mitchell G, Bartlett DW, Fraser TEM, Hawkes TR, Holt DC, Townson JC, Wichert RA (2001) Mesotrione: a new selective herbicide for use in maize. Pest Manag Sci 57:120–128 Google Scholar

  29. Pataky JK, Williams MM, Riechers DE, Meyer MD (2009) A common genetic basis for cross-sensitivity to mesotrione and nicosulfuron in sweet corn hybrid cultivars and inbreds grown throughout North America. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 134:252–260 Google Scholar

  30. Reicher ZJ, Weisenberger DV, Morton DE, Branham BE, Sharp W (2011) Fall applications of mesotrione for annual bluegrass control in Kentucky bluegrass.  10.1094/ATS-2011-0325-01-RS Google Scholar

  31. Skelton JJ, Sharp W, Branham BE (2012) Postemergence control of annual bluegrass with mesotrione in Kentucky bluegrass. HortScience 47:522–526 Google Scholar

  32. Venner KA (2011) Use of mesotrione for annual bluegrass (Poa annua L.) at cool-season turfgrass establishment. M.S. thesis. New Brunswick, New Jersey: The State University of New Jersey. 37 p Google Scholar

  33. Whaley CM, Armel GR, Wilson HP, Hines TE (2006) Comparison of mesotrione combinations with standard weed control programs in corn. Weed Technol 20:605–611 Google Scholar

  34. Yu J, PE McCullough, WK Vencill (2013) Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of amicarbazone in annual bluegrass (Poa annua), creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera), and tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea). Weed Sci 61:217–221 Google Scholar

Jialin Yu and Patrick E. McCullough "Growth Stage Influences Mesotrione Efficacy and Fate in Two Bluegrass (Poa) Species," Weed Technology 30(2), (1 May 2016). https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-15-00153.1
Received: 3 October 2015; Accepted: 1 January 2016; Published: 1 May 2016
JOURNAL ARTICLE
9 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top