Translator Disclaimer
17 April 2019 Euro+Med-Checklist Notulae, 10
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

This is the tenth of a series of miscellaneous contributions, by various authors, where hitherto unpublished data relevant to both the Med-Checklist and the Euro+Med (or Sisyphus) projects are presented. This instalment deals with the families Amaranthaceae, Campanulaceae, Caryophyllaceae, Chenopodiaceae, Compositae, Crassulaceae, Cruciferae, Cyperaceae, Ericaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Gramineae, Labiatae, Leguminosae, Moraceae, Nyctaginaceae, Orobanchaceae, Pittosporaceae, Solanaceae, Verbenaceae and Vitaceae. It includes new country and area records and taxonomic and distributional considerations for taxa in Acacia (Vachellia), Airopsis, Amaranthus, Bougainvillea, Bromus, Carex, Cerastium, Citharexylum, Clinopodium, Datura, Euphorbia, Ficus, Hieracium, Hypopitys, Kalanchoe, Lobelia, Parthenocissus, Phelipanche, Pittosporum, Polypogon, Rorippa, Spinacia and Symphyotrichum, and a new combination in Clinopodium.

Citation

For the whole article:

Raab-Straube E. von & Raus Th. (ed.) 2019: Euro+Med-Checklist Notulae, 10 [Notulae ad floram euro-mediterraneam pertinentes No. 39]. – Willdenowia 49: 95–115. doi:  https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.49.49111

For a single contribution (example):

Ryff L. 2019: Amaranthus viridis L. – P. 96 in: Raab-Straube E. von & Raus Th. (ed.), Euro+Med-Checklist Notulae, 10 [Notulae ad floram euro-mediterraneam pertinentes No. 39]. – Willdenowia 49: 95–115. doi:  https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.49.49111

Version of record first published online on 17 April 2019 ahead of inclusion in April 2019 issue.

Notice

A succinct description of the Euro+Med project, with a list of recognized territories and their abbreviations, and the conventions used to indicate the status and presence of taxa, can be found in the introduction to the first instalment of the Euro+Med Notulae (Greuter & Raab-Straube 2005: 223–226) and on the Euro+Med PlantBase website (Euro+Med 2006+). For the previous instalment of the Euro+Med-Checklist Notulae, see Raab-Straube & Raus (2018).

Contributors

I. Bazos, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Faculty of Biology, Department of Ecology and Systematics, Panepistimiopolis, 15784 Athens, Greece; e-mail: ibazos@biol.uoa.gr

C. Benítez-Benítez, Botany Area, Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemical Engineering, University Pablo de Olavide, Ctra. de Utrera km 1 – Building 22, C.P. 41013, Sevilla, Spain; e-mail: cbenben1@upo.es

L. V. Bondareva, Kovalevsky Institute of Marine Biological Research RAS, 2, Nakhimov avenue, Sevastopol, 299011, Crimea; e-mail: lbondareva@mail.ru

Ch. Chiotelis, Kerkyras 3, 81100 Mytilini, Greece; e-mail: chchiotelis@hotmail.com

Ch. Damianidis, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry and Natural Environment, School of Forestry and Natural Environment, Laboratory of Forest Botany – Geobotany, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece; e-mail: cdamiani@for.auth.gr

A. L. Ebel, Tomsk State University, Lenina Ave. 36, Tomsk 634050, Russia; e-mail: alex-08@mail2000.ru

R. El Mokni, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences “A”, Laboratory of Botany, Cryptogamy and Plant Physiology, Faculty of Pharmacy of Monastir, BP. No. 207, Avenue Avicenne, Monastir 5000, Tunisia; e-mail: riridah@hotmail.com

E. Eleftheriadou, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry and Natural Environment, School of Forestry and Natural Environment, Laboratory of Forest Botany – Geobotany, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece; e-mail: eelefthe@for.auth.gr

A. V. Fateryga, T. I. Vyazemsky Karadag Scientific Station, Nature Reserve of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Nauki Str. 24, Kurortnoye, Feodosiya 298188, Crimea; e-mail: fater_84@list.ru

P. Jiménez-Mejías, Centro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Cambio Global (CIBC-UAM), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; e-mail: pjimmej@gmail.com

S. Martín-Bravo, Botany Area, Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemical Engineering, University Pablo de Olavide, Ctra. de Utrera km. 1 – Building 22, C.P. 41013, Sevilla, Spain; e-mail: smarbra@upo.es

M. Míguez, Botany Area, Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemical Engineering, University Pablo de Olavide, Ctra. de Utrera km. 1 – Building 22, C.P. 41013, Sevilla, Spain; e-mail: mmigrio@upo.es

B. Rätzel, Lessingstraße 6, 15230 Frankfurt an der Oder, Germany; e-mail: beatrice.raetzel@googlemail.com

S. Rätzel, Lessingstraße 6, 15230 Frankfurt an der Oder, Germany; e-mail: stefan.raetzel@googlemail.com

Th. Raus, Botanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Königin-Luise-Str. 6–8, 14195 Berlin, Germany; e-mail: t.raus@bgbm.org

M. Ristow, University of Potsdam, Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation, Am Mühlenberg 3, 14476 Potsdam, Germany; e-mail: ristow@uni-potsdam.de

L. Ryff, Flora and Vegetation Department, Nikitsky Botanical Garden, National Scientific Centre, Yalta, Crimea; e-mail: ryffljub@ukr.net

L. Sáez, Unitat de Botànica, Facultat de Biociencies, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, ES-08193, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain; e-mail: Llorens.Saez@uab.cat

D. A. Samaras, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry and Natural Environment, School of Forestry and Natural Environment, Laboratory of Forest Botany – Geobotany, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece; e-mail: mail@dimitrios -samaras.net

A. N. Sennikov, Botanical Museum, Finnish Museum of Natural History, P.O. Box 7, 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland; e-mail: alexander.sennikov@helsinki.fi

M. Sequeira, Madeira Botanical Group, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Madeira, Funchal, Portugal; e-mail: miguelmenezessequeira@gmail.com

A. Strid, Bakkevej 6, 5853 Ørbæk, Denmark; e-mail: arne.strid@youmail.dk

S. A. Svirin, Sevastopol Branch of the Russian Botanical Society, Sevastopol, Crimea; e-mail: sapsan7@mail.ru

K. Theodoropoulos, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry and Natural Environment, School of Forestry and Natural Environment, Laboratory of Forest Botany – Geobotany, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece; e-mail: ktheodor@for.auth.gr

H. Uhlich, Gartenstraße 19, 56357 Welterod, Germany; e-mail: uhlich.holger@googlemail.com

A. Zeddam, 17 rue Aïssa Akif, Hussein-Dey, Algiers, Algeria; e-mail: abida_z@yahoo.fr; belkis.sol.2016 @gmail.com

Amaranthaceae

Amaranthus viridis L.

A Cm: Crimea: Yalta vicinity, Nikita, Nikitsky Botanical Garden, Upper Park, 44°30′45.14″N, 34°13′52.61″E, 155 m, well-lit and heated flower bed under regular watering with planting of Iris cultivars, together with Amaranthus blitum L. and A. retroflexus L., 27 Aug 2018, Ryff (YALT). – Weed of American origin, which is now widespread in tropical and subtropical regions. It is also known in most countries of W and C Europe as an alien (Iamonico 2015+). In E Europe, A. viridis was not known until the end of the 20th century, although S. L. Mosyakin suggested the possibility of its detection there (Mosyakin 1995, 1996). Subsequently this species was indicated from Belarus (Parfenov 1999). It was also recorded in the N Caucasus and Transcaucasia (Zernov 2006; Menitsky 2012). This is the first report of A. viridis for the Crimean peninsula, where only one locality with a few specimens was found. Further monitoring is necessary to establish the status of this alien species in the region.

L. Ryff

Campanulaceae (incl. Lobeliaceae)

Lobelia erinus L.

A Tn: Tunisia: Bizerte, Bizerte north, bordering the cor-niche, 37°19′51″N, 09°51′52″E, 5 m, coastal rock vegetation, few flowering individuals, 22 Jun 2018, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir). – Lobelia erinus is native to southern Africa (cf. Thulin & al. 1986). It is a prostrate or scrambling herbaceous annual to perennial plant; stems ascendant, 10–20 cm tall, glabrous, caespitose with blue to violet, 5-lobed corolla (cf. Bojňanský & Fargašová 2007). Often planted as an ornamental in gardens, it has been reported as naturalized in some countries of Europe, viz. Portugal (Almeida & Freitas 2006) and the United Kingdom (cf. Bojňanský & Fargašová 2007) and as adventitious in France, Germany and the Canary Islands (Castroviejo & al. 2010). For N Africa, the species is listed as cultivated or sometimes subspontaneous only from Morocco (Dobignard & Chatelain 2011; APD 2018). It is here reported for the first time from Tunisia with the status of a casual alien.

R. El Mokni

Caryophyllaceae

Cerastium bulgaricum R. Uechtr.

+ Gr: Greece: Thraki, Nomos of Rodopi, Eparchia of Sapes, 4 km NW of village of Ourania near Bulgarian border, 41°18′N, 25°54′E, 1000 m, ridge in opening of Fagus forest, acid rocks, 9 May 2018, Strid & Hartvig 59300 (UPA, herb. Strid); ibid., Eparchia of Komotini, 14 km from Organi along road to Chloi, 41°17′N, 25°48′E, 600 m, rocky serpentine slopes with open Juniperus scrub, 10 May 2018, Strid & Hartvig 59362 (UPA). – The cited specimens are fruiting, with ripe seeds. Cerastium bulgaricum is a member of the C. gracile group, which has been treated very differently in recent Floras and is in need of modern, critical revision. Flora europaea (Whitehead 1993: 175) and Atlas florae europaeae (Jalas & Suominen 1983: 119) recognized only C. gracile Dufour, with a disjunct distribution in the Iberian Peninsula and NW Africa, and then again in SE Europe and Anatolia. This clearly represents excessive lumping, and it seems reasonable to follow the monographer Möschl (1943) in recognizing three species in SE Europe, viz. C. bulgaricum, C. ramosissimum Boiss. and C. schmalhausenii Pacz., whereas C. gracile s.str. is confined to the W Mediterranean area. Cerastium schmalhausenii is restricted to Crimea and adjacent areas, and C. bulgaricum occurs in Bulgaria and Banat, whereas C. ramosissimum is more widespread. In Flora hellenica (Strid 1997: 213–214), C. bulgaricum was reluctantly merged into C. ramosissimum. With more material now available, I believe the two species are rather distinct morphologically, geographically as well as ecologically. The main differences are as follows:

Cerastium ramosissimum: Whole plant often purplish, laxly branched, 10–20 cm tall, appearing slender; fruiting pedicels spreading or deflexed, longer than calyx; capsule c. 2.5 × as long as calyx; seeds 0.6–0.9 mm, medium brown to reddish brown, with subacute tubercles. Usually on serpentine (ophiolithic substrate).

Cerastium bulgaricum: Plant pale green, erect, 5–10 cm tall, sparingly branched above and sometimes from the base, appearing robust; fruiting pedicels suberect, shorter than calyx; capsule not more than 2 × as long as calyx; seeds 0.6–0.7 mm, pale to medium brown, with rounded tubercles. On various substrates.

The cited collections from NE Greece match the type of Cerastium bulgaricum (Sintenis 636, LD!) from Dobrudscha in NE Bulgaria as well as plants illustrated as C. bulgaricum by Möschl (1943: 167) and Velev (1966: 381). This taxon presumably occurs from NE Greece through Bulgaria to S and E Romania. All other Greek material in the C. gracile group is referable to C. ramosissimum. The latter is scattered in the C and SE mainland, Evvia and the East Aegean islands, whereas a record from Mt Tzena in NC Greece (Voliotis 1983: 163) is dubious. A somewhat similar species, C. dominici Favarger, occurs locally on serpentine substrate in SW Anatolia and the island of Rodos.

A. Strid

Chenopodiaceae

Spinacia tetrandra M. Bieb. – Fig. 1.

+ Rf(CS): Russia: Dagestan, Derbent district, 4 km W of Muzaim, valley of Kamyshchay river, 41°54′26″N, 48°14′03″E, c. 110 m, desert clayey slope, 13 Jun 2018, Fateryga (photo). – Spinacia tetrandra was described from the valley of the Kura river in Transcaucasia. Within the territory covered by the Euro+Med PlantBase, S. tetrandra was previously known from Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Jordan and Syria; the record from Turkey requires confirmation (Uotila 2011+). We hereby add Russia to the known distribution of this species. Since S. tetrandra was already known from Azerbaijan, its record in the bordering Republic of Dagestan of the Russian Federation is not surprising. Because the plants were recorded in a plant community of Suaeda microphylla Pall. (Chenopodiaceae) with low anthropogenic influence (Fig. 1A), the species seems to be native for Dagestan.

A. V. Fateryga & A. L. Ebel

Fig. 1.

Spinacia tetrandra – A: habitat; B: upper part of fruiting shoot. – Russia: Dagestan, Derbent district, 4 km W of Muzaim, valley of Kamyshchay river, 13 Jun 2018, photographs by A. V. Fateryga.

f01_95.jpg

Compositae (Asteraceae)

Hieracium sylvularum Jord. ex Boreau (≡ H. murorum subsp. sylvularum (Jord. ex Boreau) Zahn; = H. grandidens Dahlst.)

N No: Norway: Bergen City, Kalfaret, Kalvedalsveien, at Høyskolen Kristiania, 60.386514°N, 05.3489635°E, school yard, margins of managed lawns along pavement, also on steep street wall opposite to school, 17 Nov 2018, Sennikov & Feulner (H837885).

N Es, Rf(C, N, NW): Fennoscandia and Russia were misleadingly included in the native distribution of this species in Sell & West (1976) and Schljakov (1989), whereas the NE limit of its native distribution embraces C and S Lithuania, S Latvia and almost the whole of Belarus, excluding Scandinavia, Finland, Estonia and Russia (Sennikov 1999, 2002, 2003). Hylander (1943, 1948) demonstrated that this species was among the most common herbaceous plants introduced for ornamental purposes in historical parks of Denmark, Finland and Sweden, as part of the philosophical concept of the English garden style. This species is still the most abundant among nearly 100 alien species of Hieracium sect. Hieracium recognized in the latest revision in Sweden (Tyler 2004). Its local abundance even led Tyler & al. (2015) to include this species into the list of plants invasive in Sweden.

In Norway, this species was recorded (as Hieracium grandidens) for the first and only time in the park of the old manor “Kjørbo” in Bærum, Norway (Nordhagen 1954b). The species was found in association with Luzula luzuloides (Lam.) Dandy & Wilmott, typical of the historical ornamental introductions in old parks (Hylander 1943; Nordhagen 1954a). This locality was taken into account in Sell & West (1976) and included in the secondary distribution area of H. grandidens in the latest treatment of the Fennoscandian flora (Mossberg & Stenberg 2018).

In 2018, a small but apparently established population of this species was observed in secondary flower in Kalfaret, an eastern neighborhood of Bergen, the district east of the old city gates that had been traditionally populated with villas and residences of well-to-do citizens. Many of those houses with surrounding green territories, built mostly in the beginning of the 20th century, still survived and harbour the traces of historical park cultivation. This locality of Hieracium sylvularum is the second one in Norway, and more are expected to emerge when historical parks are closely inspected.

The status of Hieracium sylvularum in Norway should be changed to established alien, as well as its status in Estonia and Russia.

A. N. Sennikov

Symphyotrichum graminifolium (Spreng.) G. L. Nesom (≡ Aster squamatus var. graminifolius (Spreng.) Hieron. ≡ Conyza graminifolia Spreng. ≡ Conyzanthus graminifolius (Spreng.) Tamamsch.)

– Cm: In Crimea, this plant was identified as Conyzanthus graminifolius by S. K. Kozhevnikova in 1974 (Kozhevnikova & Makhaeva 1976; YALT). It has been included under this name in all subsequent floristic reports. Supposedly the species was brought to the Crimean peninsula from Yugoslavia with building materials during the construction of the hotel complex “Yalta-Intourist”. However, for the territory of the former Yugoslavia, as for other European and Mediterranean countries, only Symphyotrichum squamatum (Spreng.) G. L. Nesom is indicated, not S. graminifolium (Greuter 2006+). The morphological peculiarities of Kozhevnikova's specimens contradict the protologue of S. graminifolium, but correspond to the one of S. squamatum (Sprengel 1826). In particular, its stems are scabrous due to small, white glands and due to larger semitransparent vesicles that look like whitish or brownish scales on dry herbarium specimens. Such structures are also present in all other Crimean herbarium specimens and living plants that I have seen. The plant habit, size and shape of leaves vary greatly even in the same population depending on the habitat conditions and the growth phase of the individual, but it seems that the specimens of S. squamatum from Crimea are no different from plants growing in other regions. The error in the determination can be explained by the use of an imperfect diagnostic key in the Flora SSSR (Tamamschjan 1959). S. graminifolium does not qualify as a weed or alien species in any other country of the world, except the countries of the former USSR (Greuter 2006+; Randall 2017). Therefore, it is necessary to exclude S. graminifolium from the Crimean flora, since all known records are referable in fact to S. squa matum. See the following entry.

L. Ryff

Symphyotrichum squamatum (Spreng.) G. L. Nesom (≡ Aster squamatus (Spreng.) Hieron. ≡ Conyza squamata Spreng. ≡ Conyzanthus squamatus (Spreng.) Tamamsch.) N Cm: Crimea: Yalta vicinity, Lower Massandra, near hotel complex “Yalta-Intourist”, 11 Nov 1974, Kozhevnikova (YALT); Yalta, Kotelnikova Str., 44°29′29″N, 34°08′56″E, 40 m, 7 Oct 2011, Ryff (YALT); ibid., 44°29′20.47″N, 34°09′44.85″E, 5 m, embankment, 18 Sep 2014, Svirin (YALT); ibid., Rudanskogo Str., in the square, 44°29′51″N, 34°10′21″E, 14 m, 15 Sep 2018, Ryff (YALT); Gurzuf vicinity, 17 Oct 2010, Ryff (YALT); Gurzuf, 44°31′55″N, 34°16′22″E, 5 m, recreation complex “Zhemchuzhina Kryma”, embankment, 16 Sep 2018, Ryff (YALT); Alushta, 44°40′40″N, 34°25′15″E, 5 m, embankment, 24 Oct 2014, Ryff (YALT); Sevastopol, upper Kamyshovaya bay, 44°34′40″N, 33°26′05″E, 0–2 m, shipyard, 29 Jul 2014, Svirin, Seregin & Yevseenkov (MW); ibid., Kamyshovaya bay, 44°34′33.68″N, 33°26′10.10″E, shipyard, 17 Sep 2014, Svirin (YALT) (all as Conyzanthus graminifolius). – Growing in and along streets, pavements, embankments, roadsides, industrial sites, asphalt and concrete areas, flowerbeds and watersides. Symphyotrichum squamatum sometimes grows together with Erigeron canadensis L. and E. sumatrensis Retz. This is the first record of this alien for E Europe. Over the past decades, S. squamatum has been notably spreading in SW Crimea. Actually it is registered in anthropogenic habitats only, but potentially it can become invasive along the Black Sea coast and in salt marshes of the Sevastopol bays.

L. Ryff

Crassulaceae

Kalanchoe marmorata Baker

A Tn: Tunisia: Monastir, Monastir city, growing on both sides of the Monastir-Sousse tourist route, 35°46′17″N, 10°42′31″E, 2–3 m, some apparently established subpopulations of few individuals, 30 Nov 2016, El Mokni (herb. El Mokni); ibid., 35°46′08″N, 10°50′22″E, 11 m, escaped individuals from public gardens, 13 Jan 2018, El Mokni (herb. El Mokni); Monastir, Jemmal, 35°37′32″N, 10°45′50″E, 30 m, escaped individuals from cultivated plants, 3 Jan 2018, El Mokni (herb. El Mokni). – Kalanchoe marmorata is native to C and E Africa, where it usually occurs on rocky places at 1200–2400 m. (Darbyshire & al. 2015; APD 2018). It is a very decorative plant due to the marbled leaves and especially its large white flowers, often cultivated both as an ornamental and as a medicinal plant (Descoings 2003). No previous data about the occurrence of this taxon in Europe are available. The present report as a casual alien is therefore the first for the flora of N Africa and the Mediterranean region (according to Marhold 2011a; APD 2018; IPNI 2012+; WCSP 2019).

R. El Mokni & L. Sáez

Kalanchoe sexangularis N. E. Br. var. sexangularis

A Tn: Tunisia: Bizerte, Bizerte city, 37°16′26″N, 09°52′27″E, 5 m, escaped individuals originating from cultivated plants, 26 Jul 2017, El Mokni (herb. El Mokni); Mahdia, Baghdadi, growing on both sides of the Monastir-Sousse tourist route, 35°34′32″N, 11°01′00″E, 8 m, apparently established subpopulation of c. 17 individuals, 30 Dec 2018, El Mokni (herb. El Mokni). – Kalanchoe sexangularis is an evergreen, robust shrub native to S and S tropical Africa: Mozambique, South Africa, Swaziland, Zambia and Zimbabwe (Figueiredo & al. 2016; APD 2018). The species can be propa- gated both sexually by seeds and asexually by simple cuttings (Descoings 2003; Figueiredo & al. 2016). Two varieties, differing in some vegetative and flower characters, are currently recognized within this species according to Figueiredo & al. (2016). The Tunisian specimens are referable to K. sexangularis var. sexangularis in having leaf margins consistently crenate and flowers relatively short, up to 14 mm long. In Europe, K. sexangularis was reported as alien only from NE Spain (Catalonia) by Aymerich & Gustamante (2016). The present report as a casual alien is therefore the first for the flora of N Africa (see Marhold 2011a; APD 2018; IPNI 2012+; WCSP 2019).

R. El Mokni & L. Sáez

Fig. 2.

Carex canariensis – A: habit; B: inflorescence; C: detail of inflorescence with utricles. – Portugal: Madeira, Encumeada, Caminho Real da Encumeada, near water station, 2 Jun 2018, photographs by M. Sequeira.

f02_95.jpg

Cruciferae (Brassicaceae)

Rorippa austriaca (Crantz) Besser

+ Gr: Greece: Nomos of Evros, Eparchia of Orestiada, W outskirts of village of Pentalofos, 41°39′N, 26°11′E, 280 m, locally gregarious on damp roadside, 11 May 2018, Strid & Hartvig 59437 (UPA, herb. Strid). – Not previously reported from Greece (Dimopoulos & al. 2013, 2016). This species is fairly widespread in Bulgaria (Assyov & al. 2006: 327) and is also known to occur in adjacent European Turkey (Davis 1965: 431). Hence the collection simply represents an expected regional extension of the distribution range.

A. Strid

Cyperaceae

Carex canariensis Kük. – Fig. 2.

+ Md(M): Portugal: Madeira, Encumeada, Caminho Real da Encumeada, near water station, 32°44′50.1″N, 17°00′55.5″W, c. 800 m, laurisilva patch with some planted Eucalyptus trees, 2 Jun 2018, BenítezBenítez 69CBB18, Míguez & Sequeira (UPOS 10728). – Since its description, Carex canariensis has been considered endemic to the Canary Islands (Kükenthal 1900; Jiménez-Mejías & Luceño 2011; Govaerts & al. 2018+), and has remained unreported from other Macaronesian archipelagos (Azores: Silva & al. 2005; Cabo Verde: Govaerts & al. 2018+; Madeira: Jardim & Menezes de Sequeira 2008). Its native status in Madeira still has to be elucidated, although the habitat of the single population we have found (a patch of laurisilva forest) suggests that it is presumably native. Carex canariensis could have been confused with C. divulsa Stokes or C. pairae F. W. Schultz (= C. muricata subsp. lamprocarpa auct.) in Madeiran floras (Menezes 1914; Press 1994) although these two species can be easily distinguished from C. canariensis by several morphological characters (see Luceño 2008; Molina & al. 2008): leaf size (usually more than 4 mm wide in C. canariensis vs up to 3.5(–4.3) mm wide in C. divulsa and C. pairae), inflorescence morphology (longer, paniculate and conspicuously branched in C. canariensis vs shorter, spicate, unbranched, or branched only at base in C. divulsa and C. pairae), and utricle appearance (ovoid to ovoid-lanceolate, conspicuously nerved on proximal half in C. canariensis vs ovoid-elliptic to elliptic and nerveless to faintly nerved at base in C. divulsa and C. pairae). Therefore, a thorough revision of herbarium specimens (in local Madeiran herbaria or in other herbaria known to include important Madeiran collections such as BM and K) could result in a wider distribution of C. canariensis in Madeira, with historical collections possibly supporting a native status. This would be the 12th native Carex species reported for the Madeiran archipelago (Jardim & Menezes de Sequeira 2008; Govaerts & al. 2018+). Although the collected specimens were rather immature, the morphology of the Madeiran plants agrees fairly well with its identification as C. canariensis after comparison with representative collections and high-resolution pictures of the type material. Moreover, we have preliminarily assessed its identity and phylogenetic relationships with the Canarian populations based on molecular data (in prep.). This finding involves a remarkable extension of the range of C. canariensis, because it was believed to be entirely confined to the Canary Islands archipelago (reported from all main islands except for the arid, easternmost Lanzarote and Fuerteventura; Jiménez-Mejías & Luceño 2011), found at a distance of c. 500 km to the south of Madeira. A considerable colonization capacity by long-distance dispersal in Carex has been suggested to explain its presence in oceanic archipelagos, including Macaronesia, where the genus is represented by a number of native species, several of them island endemics (Escudero & al. 2009; Jiménez-Mejías & Luceño 2011; Govaerts & al. 2018+). According to IUCN criteria, C. canariensis has been considered Vulnerable (VU) in the Red List of Spanish vascular flora (Moreno 2010), due to a reduced area of occupancy, severely fragmented populations, and extreme fluctuations in the number of mature individuals. The conservation status of the Madeiran population of C. canariensis reported here should be evaluated because it is the only occurrence of the species there so far.

S. Martín-Bravo, M. Míguez, C. Benítez-Benítez, M. Sequeira & P. Jiménez-Mejías

Fig. 3.

Carex reuteriana subsp. mauritanica – A: habit and habitat; B: detail of inflorescence with male and androgynous spikes. – Portugal: Alentejo, Baixo Alentejo, Beja district, between Paymogo (Huelva, Spain) and Vales Mortos, international bridge over Chanza river, 21 May 2018, photographs by S. Martín-Bravo.

f03_95.jpg

Carex reuteriana subsp. mauritanica (Boiss. & Reut.) Jim. Mejías & Luceño – Fig. 3.

+ Lu: Portugal: Alentejo, Baixo Alentejo, Beja district, between Paymogo (Huelva, Spain) and Vales Mortos, international bridge over Chanza river, 37°45′37.44″N, 7°24′45.67″W, 90 m, river shore, on quartzites, with dispersed Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl, Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn., Flueggea tinctoria (L.) G. L. Webster and Nerium oleander L., surrounding landscape of Cistus ladanifer L. scrubland derived from deterioration of Quercus rotundifolia Lam. forest, 21 May 2018, BenítezBenítez 36CBB18 & MartínBravo (UPOS 10727). – Carex reuteriana is an Ibero-N African endemic belonging to Carex sect. Phacocystis Dumort. It is distributed in the W Iberian peninsula and NW Africa (Luceño & Jiménez-Mejías 2008; Jiménez-Mejías & al. 2011). It includes two allopatric subspecies, the type subspecies from the C-NW Iberian peninsula (Spain and Portugal), and C. reuteriana subsp. mauritanica from the SW Iberian peninsula and a few isolated populations in NW Africa (N Morocco and NW Algeria; see maps in Jiménez-Mejías & al. 2011; Benítez-Benítez & al. 2018a). Both grow in creeks and river shores at low and medium altitudes; the type subspecies is acidophilous, while C. reuteriana subsp. mauritanica is indifferent to the substrate. This is the first record of C. reuteriana subsp. mauritanica for Portugal; it was found on the Portuguese shore of a river which serves as natural border between Spain (Huelva province) and Portugal (Beja district). The taxon apparently reaches Portugal very marginally, and it appears to be substituted by the close C. elata All. subsp. elata in most of S Portugal (Jiménez-Mejías & al. 2007; Rodríguez-González & al. 2010; Benítez-Benítez & al. 2018b).

S. Martín-Bravo, C. Benítez-Benítez & P. Jiménez-Mejías

Ericaceae

Hypopitys monotropa subsp. hypophegea (Wallr.) Tzvelev (≡ Monotropa hypophegea Wallr. ≡ Hypopitys hypophegea (Wallr.) G. Don)

+ AE(G): Greece: East Aegean Islands, Nomos of Lesvos, Eparchia of Mitilini, Island of Lesvos, SE of Agiasos near Sanatorion, 39°03′50″N, 26°23′36″E, c. 660 m, Castanea sativa forest on schist, 12 Jun 2017, Chiotelis (ATHU). – The genus Hypopitys is represented in Greece with two subspecies, H. monotropa subsp. monotropa and H. monotropa subsp. hypophegea, the latter recorded so far only from the N Greek mainland (Dimopoulos & al. 2013: 91). This seems to be the first record of Hypopitys from Lesvos, the floristic region of the East Aegean Islands, and the Aegean Archipelago as a whole (the taxon was not mapped in Strid 2016). The cited material belongs to H. monotropa subsp. hypophegea. The parasitic species seems to be very local on Lesvos, restricted to a small area above Agiasos. However, its presence in more localities on the island with suitable habitat conditions is not unlikely.

I. Bazos & Ch. Chiotelis

Euphorbiaceae

Euphorbia esula subsp. tommasiniana (Bertol.) Kuzmanov

+ Gr: Greece: Thraki, Nomos of Evros, Eparchia of Orestiada, 6 km NNE of Orestiada, 41°33′N, 26°34′E, 30 m, wet roadsides in agricultural area, 7 May 2018, Strid & Hartvig 59221 (UPA); ibid., Eparchia of Didimotichon, by Erythropotamos river SSE of village of Ellinochorio (W of Didimoticho), 41°22′N, 26°27′E, 50 m, 11 May 2018, Strid & Hartvig 59397 (herb. Strid). – Not previously reported from Greece (Dimopoulos & al. 2013, 2016). A regional extension of the range for this taxon, which is known from adjacent former Yugoslavia, Bulgaria and Turkey (Govaerts & Radcliffe-Smith 2000: 723). Taxonomy and nomenclature as currently adopted in Euro+Med (2006+) is followed here only with reservation. According to recent typification works and evaluations of morphological characters in the E. esula group (Reichert & al. 2018), E. saratoi Ard. has been identified as the correct name at species level for the taxon under discussion here (≡ E. esula subsp. saratoi (Ard.) P. Fourn.), while E. tommasiniana Bertol. in the original sense (Bertoloni 1842: 78–79) is supposed to be endemic to the karstic area around Trieste in NE Italy and W Slovenia. Flora of Turkey (Radcliffe-Smith 1982: 623) used the name E. virgata Waldst. & Kit., which is equally inapplicable.

A. Strid

Euphorbia glyptosperma Engelm. (≡ Chamaesyce glyptosperma (Engelm.) Small) – Fig. 4.

A Cm: Crimea: Dzhankoyskiy district, railway station Solenoe Ozero, 45°53′00″N, 34°26′57″E, 12 m, on railway tracks, 2 Oct 2011, Svirin (photo). – Euphorbia glyptosperma is native to North America, where it is widely distributed. As an alien species, it is indicated for some regions of South America (Peru) and W Asia (Caucasus, Russia) (Govaerts & al. 2019; Geltman & Medvedeva 2017). However, the main area of its introduction is Europe, where E. glyptosperma has been known since the beginning of the 20th century. This species is currently listed for at least 11 countries of Europe: N (Sweden), C (Austria, Belgium, Hungary, Netherlands, Switzerland), SW (France, Spain) and SE (Italy, Romania, Republic of North Macedonia) (DAISIE 2008+; Somlyay 2009; Geltman & Medvedeva 2017; Randall 2017; Sîrbu & Şuşnia 2018). In E Europe, E. glyptosperma was introduced in the 1980s, but was correctly identified only recently. Now it is recorded in a number of regions in SE European Russia (Geltman & Medvedeva 2017). For Crimea, this species was not previously cited (Yena 2012; Bagrikova 2013). There are no herbarium vouchers of this species in YALT and MW.

Fig. 4.

Euphorbia glyptosperma – A: habit; B: flowering and fruiting shoots; C: seeds. – Crimea: Dzhankoyskiy district, railway station Solenoe Ozero, 2 Oct 2011, photographs by S. Svirin.

f04_95.jpg

A small population of Euphorbia glyptosperma was found by S. Svirin in 2011 in the north of the Crimean peninsula in the Prisivashe area in an anthropogenic habitat. Initially, the plant was incorrectly identified as E. maculata L. or E. chamaesyce L. Unfortunately, no herbarium specimens were prepared, but the photos allow us to diagnose this record as E. glyptosperma. The species is characterized by morphological features as follows: plant somewhat ascending, completely glabrous; leaves elongate, 2–4 × as long as wide, asymmetric at base, often slightly curved; stipules linear-subulate, fringed or lobed; glands red to purple, with small, white or pinkish appendages; styles very short; seeds oblong-ovoid, apiculate, sharply angular, 1–1.4 mm long, with 3 or 4(–6) prominent, transverse ridges. It differs from E. chamaesyce in ascending shoots, shape of leaves and stipules, smaller, reddish glands and appendages, shorter styles, and seed surface structure; and from E. maculata in complete lack of pubescence, and seeds with more prominent surface sculpturing. Euphorbia glyptosperma has arrived to N Crimea probably by rail and might possibly be found in other parts of the region.

L. Ryff & S. Svirin

Euphorbia prostrata Aiton (≡ Chamaesyce prostrata (Aiton) Small ≡ Tithymalus prostratus (Aiton) Samp.)

A Cm: Crimea: Yalta vicinity, Nikita, Nikitsky Botanical Garden, Nizhniy Park, Palm Alley, 44°30′32.00″N, 34°14′02.60″E, 105 m, shaded flower bed under regular watering, 19 Jul 2018, Ryff (YALT). – Euphorbia prostrata is native for North and South America. It is widely distributed as an alien plant in many tropical, subtropical and temperate regions of the world (Randall 2017; Govaerts & al. 2019+). The first occurrence of E. prostrata in Europe was observed in the early 19th century in France, then in Italy, Portugal and Spain. Currently, it has spread to C, SW and SE Europe (Bátori & al. 2012; Randall 2017; Govaerts & al. 2019+). Recently, E. prostrata has been recorded in several countries of SE Europe (Bulgaria, Hungary, Romania, Serbia) (Anastasiu & Negrean 2008; Bátori & al. 2012; Vladimirov & al. 2014; Veljić & al. 2017). However, this species was not known for E Europe (Geltman 2012b) until it was found in Moldavia in 2014 (Izverscaia & Ghendov 2017). According to the herbarium material at YALT and to recent publications (Yena 2012; Bagrikova 2013), E. prostrata has not been collected previously in the Nikitsky Botanical Garden and in Crimea at all. Therefore, it is the first record of this alien species for the Crimean peninsula and the second one for E Europe. This floristic finding confirms an actual expansion of E. prostrata to the east. It has not yet been cited for the Caucasus (Geltman 2012a), so Crimea can be considered the current eastern border of its distribution area in Europe and the N Black Sea region.

Euphorbia prostrata is characterized by capsules hairy on the keels only and seeds usually less than 1 mm long, sharply angled, with 5–8 narrow, sharp, slightly irregular, transverse ridges (Pahlevani & Akhani 2011; Pahlevani & Riina 2011; Berry & al. 2016). It differs from the closely related E. chamaesyce L. in capsule indumentum and seed surface structure; and from E. glyptosperma Engelm. in leaf shape, pubescent capsules and somewhat smaller seeds with narrower, sharper ridges. So far, only one population of E. prostrata with no more than 50 individuals has been recorded in the Nikitsky Botanical Garden. However, it can be assumed that this species is more widely distributed in Crimea.

L. Ryff

Gramineae (Poaceae)

Airopsis tenella (Cav.) Coss. & Durieu

+ Gr: Greece: C Makedonia, Nomos of Chalkidiki, Eparchia of Arnaia, between Palaiochora and Arnaia, 40.50650°N, 23.53192°E, 400 m, broadleaved evergreen shrubland with Erica manipuliflora Salisb., parent rock granite, 15 May 2008, Damianidis 199 (TAUF); ibid., 40.50664°N, 23.53300°E, 405 m, heathland of E. manipuliflora, parent rock granite, 15 May 2008, Damianidis 206 (TAUF); ibid., 40.50342°N, 23.53297°E, 408 m, broad-leaved evergreen shrubland with E. manipuliflora, parent rock granite, 24 May 2008, Damianidis 697 (TAUF); ibid., E of Palaiochora, 40.49811°N, 23.48714°E, 415 m, broad-leaved evergreen shrubland with E. manipuliflora, parent rock granite, 17 May 2008, Damianidis 320 (TAUF); ibid., E of Palaiochora, 40.50722°N, 23.50594°E, 417 m, broadleaved evergreen shrubland with E. manipuliflora, parent rock granite, 12 Jul 2008, Damianidis 1048 (TAUF); ibid., NW of Elia Nikitis, 40.17961°N, 23.74025°E, 200 m, broad-leaved evergreen shrubland with E. manipuliflora, parent rock granite, 10 May 2014, Damianidis 1902 (TAUF); ibid., NW of Elia Nikitis, 40.16942°N, 23.75489°E, 210 m, open pine forest with understorey of E. manipuliflora, parent rock granite, 10 May 2014, Damianidis 1906 (TAUF); ibid., SE of Nikiti, 40.20619°N, 23.73158°E, 194 m, heathland of E. manipuliflora, parent rock granite, 14 May 2014, Damianidis 2050 (TAUF); ibid., N of Sarti, 40.13167°N, 23.92969°E, open pine forest with understorey of E. manipuliflora, 135 m, parent rock granite, 31 May 2014, Damianidis 2226 (TAUF); ibid., N of Gomati, 40.37950°N, 23.72314°E, 255 m, heathland of E. manipuliflora, parent rock gneiss, 10 May 2015, Damianidis 2523 (TAUF); ibid., S of Megali Panagia, 40.41156°N, 23.66731°E, 391 m, broad-leaved evergreen shrubland with E. manipuliflora, parent rock gneiss, 12 May 2015, Damianidis 2580 (TAUF). – A Mediterranean-Atlantic element not previously known to occur E of Italy. Not mentioned for Greece by Dimopoulos & al. (2013, 2016) or from adjacent Balkan countries (Valdés & Scholz 2009; Barina & al. 2018). In N Greece obviously preferring acidic soil of open places in Erica manipuliflora heathland on granite and gneiss. Numerous individuals were found in any mentioned locality. Our collections corroborate a phytosociological record of the species from E. manipuliflora heathlands further east between Mikro Tympano and Semeli (Nomos of Xanthi, W Thraki) which, however, was not substantiated by herbarium specimens (Theodoropoulos & al. 2011: 10, Table III). A 19th century report from Peloponnisos by Gittard (in herb. Fauché) was definitely considered erroneous by Boissier (1884: 527–528, under Aira globosa Thore; see also Halácsy 1904: 365–366; Hayek 1932: 328).

Ch. Damianidis, D. A. Samaras, E. Eleftheriadou & K. Theodoropoulos

Bromus arvensis subsp. parviflorus (Desf.) H. Scholz

+ Tu(A): Turkey: W Anatolia, Bafa Gölü, W side, c. 1.5 km S of Serçin, 37°31′47″N, 27°23′11″E, 2–5 m, abandoned field near waterside, salt influenced, 9 May 2006, Ristow (herb. Ristow). – This record extends the distribution of this taxon to SW Asia. The nearest findings are in Thraki, NE Greece (Raab-Straube & Scholz 2013). It is characterized by the small spike-lets, lemmas and anthers (for details on identification see Scholz 2003, 2008). The correct determination of the cited specimen was done by the late Prof. Hildemar Scholz, Berlin.

M. Ristow

Polypogon maritimus Willd.

+ Cm: Crimea: vicinity of Sevastopol, Balaklava, 11th km of Balaklava Highway, 44°31′18.72″N, 33°33′47.11″E, 150 m, disturbed grassland on limestone outcrops, 12 Jul 2017, Svirin (CSAU, YALT). – In the Crimean peninsula there were two species of the genus Polypogon indicated previously: P. monspeliensis (L.) Desf. and P. viridis (Gouan) Breistr. (Tzvelev 1976; Valdés & al. 2009+; Yena 2012). This is the first report of P. maritimus for the region. In E Europe it was earlier reported for the Lower Volga area (Tzvelev 1976). This species is widespread as native in the Mediterranean, extending to the E and S Caucasus (Tzvelev 2006; Valdés & al. 2009+). Polypogon maritimus is known as an alien and a weed in many countries of several continents (Randall 2017). The only locality in Crimea with a small population of P. maritimus was found near Balaklava. Further searches and monitoring are necessary to establish native or alien status of this species in the region.

L. Ryff, L. Bondareva & S. Svirin

Labiatae (Lamiaceae)

Clinopodium dalmaticum subsp. bulgaricum (Velen.) Raus & Strid, comb. nov.Micromeria origanifolia subsp. bulgarica Velen. in Oesterr. Bot. Z. 49: 292. 1899 ≡ Micromeria bulgarica (Velen.) Vandas in Magyar Bot. Lapok 4: 267. 1905 ≡ Satureja bulgarica (Velen.) K. Malý in Dörfler, Herb. Norm.: no. 4931. 1908 ≡ Satureja origanifolia var. bulgarica (Velen.) Stoj. & Stef., Fl. Bălg.: 958. 1925 ≡ Micromeria dalmatica f. bulgarica (Velen.) Stoj. & al., Fl. Bălg., ed. 4, 2: 924. 1967 ≡ Micromeria dalmatica subsp. bulgarica (Velen.) Guinea in Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 64: 381. 1971 ≡ Clinopodium bulgaricum (Velen.) Melnikov in Turczaninowia 19(2): 90. 2016.

Micromeria dalmatica Benth. was described from Kotor in S Dalmatia (for lectotypification, see Melnikov 2015: 106), based on a collection published by Visiani (1830: 51) under Thymus origanifolius Vis. nom. illeg. (antedated by T. origanifolius D. Don 1825 from W Himalaya). Similar plants from S Bulgaria, first described as M. origanifolia subsp. bulgarica Velen. (Velenovský 1899), were subsequently recombined as M. dalmatica subsp. bulgarica (Velen.) Guinea (Heywood 1971: 381). This subspecies occurs also in NE Greece (see, e.g., Rechinger 1939; Kitanov 1943; Quézel & Contandriopoulos 1968; Eleftheriadou & Raus 1996) including the island of Thasos (Chilton 1997, 2003). Tutin & al. (1972: 168) recognized M. dalmatica with subsp. dalmatica in “C Jugoslavia” (more precisely what is now SW Croatia and Montenegro, see map in Silić 1979: 190) and subsp. bulgarica in S Bulgaria and NE Greece (additionally extending to the Republic of North Macedonia, see Silić l.c.). Chorological separation, combined with differences mainly confined to indumentum characters of the two taxa, makes subspecific rank appropriate. It has recently been demonstrated that M. dalmatica and related species are better placed in Clinopodium than in Micromeria (Bräuchler & al. 2006, 2008; Melnikov 2015, 2016). However, the southeastern subspecies of M. dalmatica has not been recombined under Clinopodium as yet. Vandas (1905, 1909, under M. bulgarica) raised C. dalmaticum subsp. bulgaricum to species rank (followed by Silić 1979 and Greuter & al. 1986: 330) which, however, has not been adopted in any subsequent Bulgarian basic flora (Stojanov & Stefanov 1925: 958; Stojanov & al. 1967: 924; Jordanov 1989: 359; Andreev & al. 1992: 482; Assyov & al. 2006: 257). On the other hand, treating C. dalmaticum subsp. bulgaricum as a mere synonym of C. dalmaticum (Euro+Med 2006+, based on Bräuchler 2009 and followed by Dimopoulos & al. 2013) does essentially hide extant chorological and morphological information and seems therefore not recommendable.

Th. Raus & A. Strid

Leguminosae (Fabaceae)

Acacia karoo Hayne (≡ Vachellia karroo (Hayne) Banfi & Galasso)

N Ag: Algeria: Wilaya of Algiers, Daira of Hussein-Dey, Commune of Kouba, Ben Omar Kouba, ruderal slope by stone-flagged sidewalk, spontaneaous shrub to c. 1.5 m, 19 Sep 2014, Zeddam (photo); ibid., commune of El Magharia, Oued Ouchaya, spontaneous shrub to 2 m at base of stone wall, 19 Sep 2014, Zeddam (photo); ibid., commune of Hussein Dey, Institut National de Formation Supérieure Paramédicale, numerous spontaneous shrubs in waste ground behind building in neighborhood of park where a few adults were planted more than 50 years ago and began producing viable and germinating seeds this last decade, 4 Jun 2018, Zeddam (B, det. Raus); ibid., Le Caroubier, against fence at side of railway, spontaneous shrub of 2.5–3 m, 19 Sep 2014, Zeddam (obs.); ibid., Hai el Badr, spontaneous individual growing in open soil surrounding a tree, 16 May 2017, Zeddam (obs.); ibid., Panorama, numerous shrubs from 0.5–1.5 m colonizing waste ground, 2018, Zeddam (obs.); ibid., Daira of El Harrach, commune of El Harrach, above oued El Harrach on edge of bridge, shrub of 1.5 m, 2 Mar 2017, Zeddam (obs.); ibid., Wilaya of Blida, commune of Blida, spontaneaous shrub to 1.5 m by paved motorway, 27 Sep 2014, Zeddam (photo); ibid., commune of Boufarik, dense 1–2 m tall shrubs on roadsides, 22 Jun 2012, Zeddam (obs.). – Recorded as alien with unknown status in SW Europe (Portugal, Spain, Corsica, S Italy) and Morocco (Conti & al. 2005: 45; Euro+Med 2006+). Native to southern Africa (Angola to Mozambique, Barnes & al. 1996: 6–10), armed with distinctive, in Algeria usually c. 7 cm long, white, paired stipular thorns, which means that the shrub to medium-sized tree must be approached carefully. Seedlings and saplings are found in urban areas and suburbs of Algiers, where the species is locally naturalized, generated by seeds produced by certainly not deliberately planted individuals. It has recently been demonstrated that the recognition of at least five genera in the polyphyletic Acacia Mill. s.l. is inevitable, and the African taxa are better placed in the two reinstated genera Senegalia Raf. and Vachellia Wight & Arn. Accordingly, the name Vachellia karroo applies for the xenophytic species under discussion here (Kyalangalilwa & al. 2013: 513–514).

Th. Raus & A. Zeddam

Moraceae

Ficus microcarpa L. f.

A Tn: Tunisia: Bizerte, Bizerte city, epiphytic individuals on planted Melia azederach L. and Jacaranda mimosifolia D. Don trees in public gardens and on roadsides, 30 Jan 2014, El Mokni (obs.); Jendouba, Jendouba city, epiphytic individuals on planted Phoenix canariensis H. Wildpret trees on roadsides of the city, 13 Dec 2009, El Mokni (obs.); Sousse, Sousse city, epiphytic individuals on planted P. canariensis trees on roadsides of the city, 18 Jan 2019, El Mokni (photo). – Ficus microcarpa is an evergreen, monoecious tree, native to temperate and tropical Asia, Australasia and Pacific regions (USDA-ARS 2010). It has tiny seeds, which are easily spread by birds, bats and rodents and are capable of germinating almost anywhere they land (GISD 2015). It is a widely planted and popular ornamental tree that has been introduced to many tropical, subtropical and warm-temperate regions around the world (Dehgan 1998; Rauch & Weissich 2000; Burrows & Burrows 2003; Van Noort & Rasplus 2018). In the Mediterranean area, the taxon is cited for few countries, as naturalized in Sicily, the Canary Islands including Gran Canaria and as adventitious in Malta and Tenerife (Uotila 2011; Verloove & Reyes-Betancort 2011). For N Africa, the species is listed only as cultivated for Morocco, Libya and Egypt (APD 2018). For Tunisia, this is the first record as a casual (probably ornithochorous) alien.

R. El Mokni

Nyctaginaceae

Bougainvillea glabra Choisy

A Ag: Algeria: Wilaya of Boumerdes, Boumerdes train station, flowering, prostrate individual on ruderal slope by railway line, 13 May 2017, Zeddam (photo); ibid., Wilaya of Algiers, Daira of Sidi M'hamed, commune of Belouizdad, Le Ruisseau, shrubs in waste ground, 2 Jun 2018, Zeddam (B, det. Raus); ibid., Daira of Hussein-Dey, Commune of Kouba, Vieux Kouba in Christian cemetery, high spontaneous shrubs on graves, sprouted from seeds of adults cultivated in house gardens in neighborhood of cemetery, autumn 2018, Zeddam (obs.). – Native to Brazil, widely cultivated for ornament around the Mediterranean Sea, but in Algeria not previously reported outside cultivation. For status assessment of Bougainvillea glabra in Algeria we share the opinion of Barina & al. (2013: 177), who reported the species in Albania as a remnant of earlier plantings in natural habitats, thereby stating that there are no reports on its naturalization with spreading populations in Mediterranean countries so far. In Macaronesia, however, the species is given as established in the Canary Islands of La Gomera and Gran Canaria (Euro+Med 2006+; Arechavaleta & al. 2010: 127).

Th. Raus & A. Zeddam

Orobanchaceae

Phelipanche gratiosa (Webb) Carlón & al. (≡ Phelypaea gratiosa Webb ≡ Orobanche gratiosa (Webb) Linding.)

+ Ca(G): Canary Islands: La Gomera, NNE of Vallehermoso, near Playa de la Sepultura 28°11′39″N, 17°14′52″W (WGS 84), 130 m, phrygana near old gravel road, on Launaea arborescens (Batt.) Murb. (root attachment verified), 23 May 2018, Rätzel & Rätzel (herb. S. Rätzel).

+ Ca(H): Canary Islands: El Hierro, at Mirador de la Peña, 3 Apr 1983, Lobin 698 (FR, as O. ramosa, rev. Uhlich 8 Feb 2012).

New for La Gomera and El Hierro (not recorded for these islands in Kunkel 1980; Acebes & al. 2010; Muer & al. 2016; Sánchez-Pedraja & al. 2016+). This taxon was described from La Graciosa, Canary Islands (Webb in Webb & Berthelot 1845), and the lectotype was designated by A. Santos (FI000239! without date). Phelipanche gratiosa differs from P. ramosa (L.) Pomel s.str. and P. mutelii (F. W. Schultz) Pomel s.l. [incl. var. nana (Noë ex Reut.) Uhlich & Rätzel] at first sight by the taller and more robust habit, to 40 cm tall (vs to c. 20 cm tall, rarely taller), the larger corolla, (15–)19–27 mm long (vs 8–18[–20] mm long), the richly flowered spike, very dense and compact in the distal two thirds (vs spike typically lax in full flower and rather few-flowered). The most common host is the dwarf shrub Launaea arborescens; rarely have other Asteraceae been observed as hosts as well (Reichardia tingitana (L.) Roth and Urospermum picroides (L.) Scop.). By contrast, L. arborescens is not known as a host for P. ramosa or P. mutelii. For more diagnostic characters of those and other Phelipanche species, see the table in Rätzel & al. (2017: 660ff).

S. Rätzel, B. Rätzel & H. Uhlich

Pittosporaceae

Pittosporum tobira (Thunb.) W. T. Aiton

A Tn: Tunisia: Monastir, Monastir city, epiphytic individuals on planted Phoenix canariensis H. Wildpret trees, 1 Nov 2017, El Mokni (photo). – Native to Japan and China, Pittosporum tobira is an evergreen shrub easily recognizable by its clusters of extremely fragrant, creamy white flowers during late spring. This taxon was listed as highly invasive in Italy, Sicily and Spain (cf. Dana & al. 2001; Sanz-Elorza & al. 2001; Celesti-Grapow & al. 2016), whereas for France, Portugal and Sardinia it is reported as alien with unknown status (Marhold 2011b). For N Africa, the taxon was only reported from Libya as cultivated on a large scale (Marhold 2011b; APD 2018). This is the first record from Tunisia as a local, possibly ornithochorous, casual escape from cultivation.

R. El Mokni

Solanaceae

Datura wrightii Regel

N Tn: Tunisia: Bizerte, Bizerte north, towards the cor-niche, 37°18′03″N, 09°52′06″E, 2 m, roadside vegetation, 1 Jul 2017, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir); Jendouba, Tabarka, toward city, 36°57′04″N, 08°46′00″E, 2 m, roadside vegetation, 6 Jan 2019, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir); Monastir, Bir Ettaeib, 35°37′34″N, 10°44′57″E, 23 m, roadside, 21 Sep 2016, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir); Jemmel, 35°37′07″N, 10°45′28″E, 30 m, roadside, 2 Nov 2015, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir); Ksar Hellal 35°38′03″N, 10°52′40″E, 11 m, roadside near railway, 22 Nov 2018, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir); Lamta, 35°40′35″N, 10°52′40″E, 6 m, roadside near non-permanent stream among olive groves, 22 Oct 2018, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir); Menzel Nour, 35°39′56″N, 10°45′59″E, 25 m, roadside, 25 Dec 2018, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir); Monastir city, 35°47′00″, 10°48′28″E, 17 m, frequent on roadsides, 19 Dec 2018, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir). – Datura wrightii is a perennial plant native to the SW United States and Mexico. In the Mediterranean area, it has been widely confused with the closely related D. inoxia Mill. (Verloove 2008). In Europe, the taxon has been reported as casual or naturalized alien in Italy (see, e.g., Ardenghi & al. 2011; Galasso & al. 2018), Spain (Verloove 2008) and Corsica (Valdés 2012+). For N Africa, the species is listed only from Tunisia as a casual alien (Valdés 2012+; Ardenghi 2017; APD 2018). Many populations, sometimes with hundreds of individuals, have been observed since 2015, and they have been occupying more and more space mainly in C and N Tunisia due to the plentiful production of fruits and seeds from July to January. Therefore, the actual status of this taxon in Tunisia is re-defined here as fully naturalized.

R. El Mokni

Verbenaceae

Citharexylum spinosum L. Fig. 5.

A Tn: Tunisia: Sousse, Mohamed V, near railroad track leading to Sousse Bab-Jdid station, only three individuals very close to walls of old buildings, 26 Jan 2019, El Mokni (photo). – Citharexylum spinosum is native to the Caribbean (Turner & Wasson 1997). It is cultivated in warm regions of the world as an ornamental for its fragrant, white flowers and attractive foliage. The wood is sometimes used in cabinetry (Turner & Wasson 1997). This taxon was documented as naturalized on O‘ahu, Hawaiian Islands (Herbarium Pacificum Staff 1998), where it has a proven ability to invade native ecosystems in the Ko‘olau Range. In the same Islands, on Maui, C. spinosum has spread from plantings and is naturalized in Haiku, Kihei and Lahaina (Starr & al. 2002). Within the Mediterranean area, it was until now known only from Tunisia as cultivated (APD 2018). Therefore, this citation as a casual alien, almost certainly dispersed by fruit eating birds, constitutes the first report of the species for the Tunisian flora, N Africa and the Mediterranean area outside cultivation.

R. El Mokni

Vitaceae

Parthenocissus quinquefolia (L.) Planch.

A Tn: Tunisia: Bizerte, Bizerte city, epiphytic individuals on planted Melia azedarach L. trees on roadsides, 11 Jun 2014, El Mokni (photo). – Native to C and E North America south to Mexico, Parthenocissus quinquefolia is a woody, deciduous, vigorous, tendril-climbing vine that grows rapidly with no need of support as it clings to all types of surfaces due to its adhesive holdfasts located at the tendril ends. Its greenish white flowers give way to a high number of blue-black berries that are searched for and eaten by birds in autumn. Introduced as an ornamental, it has escaped from gardens to become naturalized and listed as invasive in several European countries (Ardenghi & al. 2017; DAISIE 2017; GRIIS 2017), China (Chen & Wen 2007) and Cuba (Oviedo Prieto & al. 2006: 49; Oviedo Prieto & González-Oliva 2015: 32) and regarded as an environmental weed in Australia (Weeds of Australia 2017). In N Africa, the taxon is reported as a naturalized alien only in Algeria (Zeddam & Raus 2010). Therefore, this citation as a casual alien constitutes the first report for the Tunisian flora as a local escape from cultivation, probably disseminated by birds.

R. El Mokni

Fig. 5.

Citharexylum spinosum – Tunisia: Sousse, Mohamed V, near railroad track leading to Sousse Bab-Jdid station, 26 Jan 2019, photograph by R. El Mokni.

f05_95.jpg

Acknowledgements

Arne Strid wishes to thank Per Hartvig and Georgios Korakis for good company and assistance on joint field work in NE Greece in May 2018. Travel was supported by a grant from the Velux Foundation, Denmark. Two anonymous reviewers are thanked for their comments on earlier versions of these Notulae.

References

1.

Acebes J. R., León M. C., Rodríguez M. L., del Arco M., García A., Pérez P. L., Rodríguez O., Martín V. E. & Wildpret de la Torre W. 2010: Pteridophyta, Spermatophyta. – Pp. 119–172in: Arechavaleta M., Rodríguez S., Zurita N. & Garcia A. (coord.), Lista de especies silvestres de Canarias. Hongos, plantas y animales terrestres. 2009. – Santa Cruz de Tenerife: Gobierno de Canarias. Google Scholar

2.

Almeida J. D. & Freitas H. 2006: Exotic flora of continental Portugal – a reassessment. – Bot.Complutensis30: 117–130. Google Scholar

3.

Anastasiu P. & Negrean G. 2008: Plante strāine noi în România. New alien plants to Romania. – Analele Univ. Craiova Agric. Montanol. Cadast. 38/B: 1–10. Google Scholar

4.

Andreev N., Ančev M., Kožuharov S., Markova M., Peev D. & Petrova A. 1992: Opredelitel na bissite rastenija v Bălgarija. – Sofija: Nauka i iskustvo. Google Scholar

5.

APD2018: African Plant Database (version 3.4.0). Citharexylum spinosum L., Datura wrightii Regel, Ficus microcarpa L. f., Kalanchoe Adans., Lobelia erinus L., Parthenocissus quinquefolia (L.) Planch., Pittosporum tobira (Thunb.) W. T. Aiton – Genève: Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques; Pretoria: South African National Biodiversity Institute. – Published at  http://www.ville-ge.ch/musinfo/bd/cjb/africa/ [accessed 28 Jan 2019]. Google Scholar

6.

Ardenghi N. M. G. 2017: Datura wrightii Regel A Tn. – Pp. 94in: Raab-Straube E. von & Raus Th. (ed.), Euro+Med-Checklist Notulae, 7 [Notulae ad floram euro-mediterraneam pertinentes No. 36]. –  Willdenowia47: 89–96. Google Scholar

7.

Ardenghi N. M. G., Galasso G. & Banfi E. 2017: Vitaceae. – In: Euro+Med PlantBase – the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. – Published at  http://ww2.bgbm.org/EuroPlusMed/PTaxonDetail.asp?NameId=34507&PTRefFk=7100000 [accessed 29 Jan 2019]. Google Scholar

8.

Ardenghi N. M. G., Parolo G. & Di Gregorio B. 2011: 60. Datura wrightii Regel (Solanaceae). – P. 145in: Barberis G., Nepi C., Peccenini S. & Peruzzi L. (ed.), Notulae alla flora esotica d'Italia: 4 (54–89). – Inform. Bot. Ital. 43: 144–150. Google Scholar

9.

Arechavaleta M., Rodríguez S., Zurita N. & García A. (coord.) 2010: Lista de especies silvestres de Canarias. Hongos, plantas y animales terrestres. 2009. – Santa Cruz de Tenerife: Servicio de Biodiversidad, Dirección General del Medio Natural, Consejería de Medio Ambiente y Ordenación Territorial del Gobierno de Canarias. Google Scholar

10.

Assyov B. & Petrova A. (ed.) 2006: Conspectus of the Bulgarian vascular flora. Distribution maps and floristic elements. Ed. 3. – Sofia: Bulgarian Biodiversity Foundation. Google Scholar

11.

Aymerich P. & Gustamante L. 2016: Nuevas citas de plantas alóctonas de origen ornamental en el litoral meridional de Cataluña, II. – Bouteloua24: 93–112. Google Scholar

12.

Bagrikova N. A. 2013: Strukturnyi analiz adventivnoy fraktsii flory Krymskogo poluostrova (Ukraina). – Ukrayins'k.Bot. Zhurn.70: 489–507. Google Scholar

13.

Barina Z., Rakaj M. & Pifkó D. 2013: Contributions to the flora of Albania, 4. –  Willdenowia43: 165–184. Google Scholar

14.

Barina Z., Somogyi G., Pifkó D. & Rakaj M. 2018: Checklist of vascular plants of Albania. –  Phytotaxa378: 1–339. Google Scholar

15.

Barnes R. D., Fagg C. W. & Milton S. J. 1996: Acacia karroo. Monograph and annotated bibliography. – Trop. Forest. Pap. Commonw. Forest. Inst.32: 1–77. Google Scholar

16.

Bátori Z., Erdös L. & Somlyay L. 2012: Euphorbia prostrata (Euphorbiaceae), a new alien in the Carpathian Basin. –  Acta Bot. Hung.54: 235–243. Google Scholar

17.

Benítez-Benítez C., Escudero M., Rodríguez-Sánchez F., Martín-Bravo S. & Jiménez-Mejías P. 2018a: Pliocene-Pleistocene ecological niche evolution shapes the phylogeography of a Mediterranean plant group. –  Molec. Ecol.27: 1696–1713. Google Scholar

18.

Benítez-Benítez C., Jiménez-Mejías P. & Martín-Bravo S. 2018b: Nuevas citas de grandes cárices riparias para Extremadura (provincia de Badajoz) y Portugal: 108(1). Carex elata s.s. y 108(2) C. reuteriana subsp. mauritanica (= C. elata subsp. tartessiana). – Folia Bot. Extremadur.12: 115–119. Google Scholar

19.

Berry P. E., Riina R., Peirson J. A., Yang Y., Steinmann V. W., Geltman D. V., Moravetz J. J., Cacho N. I. 2016: Euphorbia L. – Pp. 237–324in: Flora of North America Editorial Committee (ed.), Flora of North America north of Mexico 12. – New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar

20.

Bertoloni A. 1842–1845: Flora italica sistens plantas in Italia et in insulis circumstantibus sponte nascentes 5 [pp. 1–256 (1842), pp. 257–384 (1843), pp. 385–512 (1844), pp. 513–654 (1845)]. – Bononiae: Haeredum R. Masii. Google Scholar

21.

Boissier E. 1884: Flora orientalis 5 [pp. 429–868]. – Genève, Basel & Lyon: H. Georg. Google Scholar

22.

Bojnanský V. & Fargašová A. 2007: Atlas of seeds and fruits of Central and East-European Flora. The Carpathian mountains region. – Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media. Google Scholar

23.

Bräuchler C. 2009: Phylogenetische und taxonomische Untersuchungen an der Subtribus Menthinae (Lamiaceae, Nepetoideae, Mentheae) unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Satureja-Komplexes. – München: PhD thesis, Fakultät für Biologie der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität. – Published at  https://edoc.ub.uni-muenchen.de/11037/1/Braeuchler_Christian.pdf [accessed 10 Jan 2019]. Google Scholar

24.

Bräuchler C., Heubl G. & Ryding O. 2008: The genus Micromeria Benth. (Lamiaceae) – a synoptical update. –  Willdenowia38: 363–410. Google Scholar

25.

Bräuchler C., Meimberg H. & Heubl G. 2006: New names in Old World Clinopodium – the transfer of the species of Micromeria sect. Pseudomelissa to Clinopodium. –  Taxon55: 977–981. Google Scholar

26.

Burrows J. & Burrows S.2003: Figs of southern & south-central Africa. – Hatfield: Umdaus Press. Google Scholar

27.

Castroviejo S., Aldasoro J. J. & Alarcón M.; with contributions from Hand R. 2010: Campanulaceae. – In: Euro+Med PlantBase – the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. – Published at  http://ww2.bgbm.org/EuroPlusMed/PTaxonDetail.asp?NameId=15312&PTRefFk=7400000 [accessed 20 Jan 2019]. Google Scholar

28.

Celesti-Grapow L., Bassi L., Brundu G., Camarda I., Carli E., D'Auria G., Del Guacchio E., Domina G., Ferretti G., Foggi B., Lazzaro L., Mazzola P., Peccenini S., Pretto F., Stinca A. & Blasi C. 2016: Plant invasions on small Mediterranean islands: An overview. –  Pl. Biosyst.150: 1119–1133. Google Scholar

29.

Chen Z. & Wen J. 2007: Parthenocissus Planchon. – Pp. 173–177in: Wu Z. & Raven P. H. (ed.), Flora of China 12. Hippocastanaceae through Theaceae. – Beijing: Science Press; St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden Press. – Published at  http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=124105 [accessed 29 Jan 2019]. Google Scholar

30.

Chilton L. 1997: Plant list for Skala Potamias, Thasos. – Hunstanton: Marengo Press. Google Scholar

31.

Chilton L. 2003: Plant list for Thasos. Revised edition. – Hunstanton: Marengo Press. Google Scholar

32.

Conti F., Abbate G., Alessandrini A. & Blasi C. (ed.) 2005: An annotated checklist of the Italian vascular flora. – Roma: Palombi. Google Scholar

33.

DAISIE2017: Delivering Alien Invasive Species Inventories for Europe. European Invasive Alien Species Gateway. – Published at  http://www.europe-aliens.org/default.do [accessed 29 Jan 2019]. Google Scholar

34.

DAISIE European Invasive Alien Species Gateway2008+: Chamaesyce glyptosperma. – Published at  http://www.europe-aliens.org/speciesFactsheet.do?speciesId=10134 [accessed 16 Jan 2019]. Google Scholar

35.

Dana E. D., Cerrillo M. I., Sanz-Elorza M., Sobrino E. & Mota J. F. 2001: Contribución al conocimiento de las xenófitas en España: catálogo provisional de la flora alóctona de Almería. – Acta Bot. Malac.26: 264–276. Google Scholar

36.

Darbyshire I., Kordofani M., Farag I., Candiga R. & Pickering H. 2015: The plants of Sudan and South Sudan. An annotated checklist. – Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Google Scholar

37.

Davis P. H. 1965: Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands 1. – Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Google Scholar

38.

Dehgan B. 1998: Landscape plants for subtropical climates. – Gainesville: University Press of Florida. Google Scholar

39.

Descoings B. 2003: Kalanchoe. – Pp. 143–181in: Eggli U. (ed.), Illustrated handbook of succulent plants. Crassulaceae. – Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. Google Scholar

40.

Dimopoulos P., Raus Th., Bergmeier E., Constantinidis Th., Iatrou G., Kokkini S., Strid A. & Tzanoudakis D. 2013: Vascular Plants of Greece: an annotated checklist. – Berlin: Botanic Garden and Botanical Museum Berlin-Dahlem; Athens: Hellenic Botanical Society. –  Englera 31. Google Scholar

41.

Dimopoulos P., Raus Th., Bergmeier E., Constantinidis Th., Iatrou G., Kokkini S., Strid A. & Tzanoudakis D. 2016: Vascular Plants of Greece. An annotated checklist. Supplement. –  Willdenowia46: 301–347. Google Scholar

42.

Dobignard A. & Chatelain C. 2011: Index synonymique de la flore d'Afrique du Nord 3. Dicotyledoneae, Balsaminaceae à Euphorbiaceae. – Genève: Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques. Google Scholar

43.

Eleftheriadou E. & Raus Th. 1996: The vascular flora of the nature reserve Frakto Virgin Forest of Nomos Dramas (E Makedonia, Greece). –  Willdenowia25: 455–485. Google Scholar

44.

Escudero M., Valcárcel V., Vargas P. & Luceño M. 2009: Significance of ecological vicariance and long-distance dispersal in the diversification of Carex sect. Spirostachyae (Cyperaceae). –  Amer. J. Bot.96: 2100–2114. Google Scholar

45.

Euro+Med2006+ [continuously updated]: Euro+Med PlantBase – the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. – Published at  http://ww2.bgbm.org/EuroPlusMed [accessed 10 Jan 2019]. Google Scholar

46.

Figueiredo E., Smith G. F. & Crouch N. R. 2016: The taxonomy and type of Kalanchoe sexangularis N. E. Br. (Crassulaceae). –  Bradleya34: 92–96. Google Scholar

47.

Galasso G., Conti F., Peruzzi L., Ardenghi N. M. G., Banfi E., Celesti-Grapow L., Albano A., Alessandrini A., Bacchetta G., Ballelli S., Bandini Mazzanti M., Barberis G., Bernardo L., Blasi C., Bouvet D., Bovio M., Cecchi L., Del Guacchio E., Domina G., Fascetti S., Gallo L., Gubellini L., Guiggi A., Iamonico D., Iberite M., Jiménez-Mejías P., Lattanzi E., Marchetti D., Martinetto E., Masin R. R., Medagli P., Passalacqua N. G., Peccenini S., Pennesi R., Pierini B., Podda L., Poldini L., Prosser F., Raimondo F. M., Roma-Marzio F., Rosati L., Santangelo A., Scoppola A., Scortegagna S., Selvaggi A., Selvi F., Soldano A., Stinca A., Wagensommer R. P., Wilhalm T. & Bartolucci F. 2018: An updated checklist of the vascular flora alien to Italy. –  Pl. Biosyst.152: 556–592. Google Scholar

48.

Geltman D. V. 2012a: Euphorbiaceae Juss. – Pp. 494–513in: Takhtajan A. L. (ed.), Konspekt flory Kavkaza 3(2). – Sankt-Peterburg & Moskva: Tovarishchestvo nauchnykh izdaniy KMK. Google Scholar

49.

Geltman D. V. 2012b: Sem. Euphorbiaceae Juss. – Molochaynye. – Pp. 482–494in: Tzvelev N. N. (ed.), Konspekt flory Vostochnoy Evropy 1. –Moskva & Sankt-Peterburg: Tovarishchestvo nauchnykh izdaniy KMK. Google Scholar

50.

Geltman D. V. & Medvedeva N. A. 2017: Euphorbia glyptosperma (Euphorbiaceae) – novyj chužerodnyj vid flory Rossii. [Euphorbia glyptosperma (Euphorbiaceae), an alien species new for the flora of Russia; in Russian, with an English abstract]. – Novosti Sist. Vyssh. Rast.48: 131–135. Google Scholar

51.

Global Invasive Species Database (GISD)2015: Species profile Ficus microcarpus. – Published at  http://www.iucngisd.org/gisd/species.php?sc=1634 [accessed 31 Jan 2019]. Google Scholar

52.

Govaerts R., Fernandez Casas F. J., Barker C., Carter S., Davies S., Esser H.-J., Gilbert M., Hoffmann P., Radcliffe-Smith A., Steinmann V., Welzen P. van & Whitmoore T. 2019: World Checklist of Euphorbiaceae.Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. – Published at  https://wcsp.science.kew.org/ [accessed 16 Jan 2019]. Google Scholar

53.

Govaerts R., Frodin D. G. & Radcliffe-Smith A. 2000: World checklist and bibliography of Euphorbiaceae (and Pandaceae). 2. CrotonExcoecariopsis. – Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Google Scholar

54.

Govaerts R., Jiménez-Mejías P., Koopman J., Simpson D., Goetghebeur P., Wilson K., Egorova E. & Bruhl J.2018+: World Checklist of Cyperaceae.Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. – Published at  http://wcsp.science.kew.org/ [accessed Sep 2018]. Google Scholar

55.

Greuter W. 2006+ [continuously updated]: Compositae (pro parte majore). – In: Greuter W. & Raab-Straube E. von (ed.), Compositae. Euro+Med PlantBase – the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. – Published at  http://ww2.bgbm.org/EuroPlusMed/PTaxonDetail.asp?NameId=14103&PTRef Fk=7000000 [accessed 6 Oct 2018]. Google Scholar

56.

Greuter W., Burdet H. M. & Long G. 1986: Med-Checklist. A critical inventory of vascular plants of the cir-cum-mediterranean countries 3. Dicotyledones (ConvolvulaceaeLabiatae). – Genève: Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques; Berlin: Secrétariat Med-Checklist, Botanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum Berlin-Dahlem. Google Scholar

57.

Greuter W. & Raab-Straube E. von (ed.) 2005: Euro+Med Notulae, 1 [Notulae ad floram euro-mediterraneam pertinentes 16]. –  Willdenowia35: 223–239. Google Scholar

58.

GRIIS2017: Global Register of Introduced and Invasive Species. – Published at  http://www.griis.org/ [accessed 29 Jan 2019]. Google Scholar

59.

Halácsy E. von 1904: Conspectus florae graecae 3. –Leipzig: Engelmann. Google Scholar

60.

Hayek A. 1932: Prodromus florae peninsulae Balcanicae 3. Monocotyledoneae. – Repert. Spec. Nov. Regni Veg. Beih.30(3). Google Scholar

61.

Herbarium Pacificum Staff1998: New Hawaiian plant records for 1997. – Bishop Mus. Occas. Pap.56: 8–15. Google Scholar

62.

Heywood V. H. (ed.) 1971: Flora europaea. Notulae systematicae ad floram europaeam spectantes no. 11. –  Bot. J. Linn. Soc.64: 353–381. Google Scholar

63.

Hylander N. 1943: Die Grassameneinkömmlinge schwedischer Parke mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Hieracia silvaticiformia. – Symb. Bot. Upsal.7(1). Google Scholar

64.

Hylander N. 1948: Några växtfynd på Observatorieberget i Åbo. – Memoranda Soc. Fauna Fl. Fenn.24: 86–88. Google Scholar

65.

Iamonico D. 2015+ [continuously updated]: Amaranthaceae. – In: Euro+Med PlantBase – the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. – Published at  http://ww2.bgbm.org/EuroPlusMed/PTaxonDetail. asp?NameId=877&PTRefFk=7300000 [accessed 6 Oct 2018 ]. Google Scholar

66.

IPNI2012+[continuously updated]: The International Plant Names Index. – Published at  http://www.ipni.org [accessed 23 Jan 2019]. Google Scholar

67.

Izverscaia T. & Ghendov V. 2017: Euphorbia prostrata Aiton (Euphorbiaceae) – a new alien in the flora of Republic of Moldova. – P. 35in:Conservation of plant diversity. Proceedings of international symposium. – Chisinau (Moldova): Gradina Botanica. Google Scholar

68.

Jalas J. & Suominen J. 1983 (ed.): Atlas florae europaeae 6: Caryophyllaceae (Alsinoideae and Paronychioideae). – Helsinki: The Committee for Mapping the Flora of Europe & Societas Biologica Fennica Vanamo. Google Scholar

69.

Jardim R. & Menezes de Sequeira M. 2008: Lista das plantas vasculares (Pteridophyta and Spermatophyta). – Pp. 179–208in: Borges P. A. V., Abreu C., Aguiar A. M. F., Carvalho P., Fontinha S., Jardim R., Melo I., Oliveira P., Sequeira M. M., Sérgio C., Serrano A. R. M., Sim-Sim M. & Vieira P. (ed.), A list of the terrestrial fungi, flora and fauna of Madeira and Selvagens archipelagos. – Funchal: Direcção Regional do Ambiente da Madeira; Angra do Heroísmo: Universidade dos Açores. Google Scholar

70.

Jiménez-Mejías P., Escudero M., Chaparro A. J. & Luceño, M. 2007: Novedades corológicas del genero Carex para la Península Ibérica. – Acta Bot. Malac.32: 305–309. Google Scholar

71.

Jiménez-Mejías P., Escudero M., Guerra-Cárdenas S., Lye K. A. & Luceño M. 2011: Taxonomic delimitation and drivers of speciation in the Ibero-North African Carex sect. Phacocystis river-shore group (Cyperaceae). –  Amer. J. Bot.98: 1855–1867. Google Scholar

72.

Jiménez-Mejías P. & Luceño M. 2011: Cyperaceae. – In: Euro+Med PlantBase – the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. – Published at  http://ww2.bgbm.org/EuroPlusMed/PTaxonDetail.asp?NameId=37987&PTRefFk=7400000 [accessed Sep 2018]. Google Scholar

73.

Jordanov D. (ed.) 1989: Flora na Narodna Republika Bălgarija 9. – Sofija: Izdatelstvo na Bălgarskata akademija na naukite. Google Scholar

74.

Kitanov B. 1943: Varhu rastitelnost'ta na planinata Boza-Daga va istocna Makedonija. – God. Sofiisk. Univ. Fiz.-Mat. Fak. Kn. 3 Estestv. Istorija39: 169–291. Google Scholar

75.

Kozhevnikova S. K. & Makhaeva L. V. 1976: Dopolnenyya k adventyvnoy flore Kryma. – Bot. Zhurn.61: 566–567. Google Scholar

76.

Kükenthal G. 1900: Carex canariensis nov. spec. – Allg. Bot. Z. Syst.6: 235. Google Scholar

77.

Kunkel G. 1980: Die Kanarischen Inseln und ihre Pflanzenwelt. – Stuttgart & New York: G. Fischer. Google Scholar

78.

Kyalangalilwa B., Boatwright J. S., Daru B. H., Maurin O. & Van der Bank M. 2013: Phylogenetic position and revised classification of Acacia s.l. (Fabaceae: Mimosoideae) in Africa, including new combinations in Vachellia and Senegalia. –  Bot. J. Linn. Soc.172: 500–523. Google Scholar

79.

Luceño M. 2008: Carex L. – Pp. 109–250in: Castroviejo S. & al. (ed.), Flora Iberica. Plantas vasculares de la Península Ibérica e Islas Baleares 18. CyperaceaePontederiaceae. – Madrid: Real Jardín Botánico, CSIC. Google Scholar

80.

Luceño M.& Jiménez-Mejías P. 2008: Carex sect. Phacocystis Dumort. – Pp. 237–246in: Castroviejo S. & al. (ed.), Plantas vasculares de la Península Ibérica e Islas Baleares 18. CyperaceaePontederiaceae. – Madrid: Real Jardín Botánico, CSIC. Google Scholar

81.

Marhold K.2011a: Crassulaceae. – In: Euro+Med PlantBase – the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. – Published at  http://ww2.bgbm.org/EuroPlusMed/PTaxonDetail.asp?NameId=18091 &PTRefFk=7200000 [accessed 23 Jan 2019]. Google Scholar

82.

Marhold K. 2011b: Pittosporaceae. – In: Euro+Med PlantBase – the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. – Published at:  http://ww2.bgbm.org/EuroPlusMed/PTaxonDetail.asp?Na meId=27874&PTRefFk=7200000 [accessed 29 Jan 2019]. Google Scholar

83.

Marschall von Bieberstein F. A. 1808: Flora taurico-caucasica exhibens stirpes phaenogamas, in Chersoneso Taurica et regionibus caucasicis sponte crescentes 2. – Kharkov: Typis Academicis. Google Scholar

84.

Melnikov D. G. 2015: New sections of the genus Clinopodium L. (Lamiaceae) and their synopsis. –  Turczaninowia18(3): 103–112. Google Scholar

85.

Melnikov D. G. 2016: New taxa in the genus Clinopodium L. (Lamiaceae). 2. –  Turczaninowia19(2): 86–98. Google Scholar

86.

Menezes C. A. 1914: Flora do Archipelago da Madeira (Phanerogamicas e cryptogamicas vasculares). – Funchal: Bazar do Povo. Google Scholar

87.

Menitsky G. L. 2012: Amaranthaceae. – Pp. 218–221in: Takhtajan A. L. (ed.), Konspekt flory Kavkaza 3(2). –Sankt-Peterburg & Moskva: Tovarishchestvo nauchnykh izdaniy KMK. Google Scholar

88.

Molina A., Acedo C. & Llamas F. 2008: Taxonomy and new taxa of the Carex divulsa aggregate in Eurasia (section Phaestoglochin, Cyperaceae). –  Bot. J. Linn. Soc.156: 385-409. Google Scholar

89.

Moreno J. C. (coord.) 2010: Lista Roja de la flora vascular Española 2008, actualización con los datos del Adenda 2010 al Atlas y Libro Rojo de la flora vascular amenazada. – Madrid: Dirección General de Conservación de la Naturaleza y Sociedad Española de Biología de la Conservación de Plantas. Google Scholar

90.

Möschl W. 1943: Die Sippe des Cerastium ramosissimum Boissier. –  Oesterr. Bot. Z.94: 161–182. Google Scholar

91.

Mossberg B. & Stenberg L. 2018: Nordens flora, ed. 3. – Stockholm: Bonnier Fakta. Google Scholar

92.

Mosyakin S. L. 1995: Ohlyad rodu Amaranthus L. (Amaranthaceae) v Ukraini. – Ukrayins'k. Bot. Zhurn.52: 225–234. Google Scholar

93.

Mosyakin S. L. 1996: Shchiritsa, Amarant – Amaranthus L. – Pp. 11–18in: Tzvelev N. N. (ed.), Flora vostochnoj Evropy 9. – Sankt-Peterburg: Mir i Sem'ya 95. Google Scholar

94.

Muer T., Sauerbier H. & Cabrera Calixto F. 2016: Die Farn- und Blütenpflanzen der Kanarischen Inseln. – Weikersheim: Margraf. Google Scholar

95.

Nordhagen R. 1954a: Om gjennombruddet av den engelske landskapsstil i nordisk havekunst og dens betydning for Nordens flora. – Blyttia12: 37–101. Google Scholar

96.

Nordhagen R. 1954b: Om Poa Chaixii i det gamle parkanlegg på Rotvoll ved Trondheim og et funn av Luzula luzuloides i Lunden på Kjørbo i Bærum. – Blyttia12: 158–166. Google Scholar

97.

Oviedo Prieto R. & González-Oliva L. 2015: Lista nacional de plantas invasoras y potencialmente invasoras en la República de Cuba – 2015. – Bissea 9 (Núm. Espec. 2). Google Scholar

98.

Oviedo Prieto R., Herrera Oliver P. P., García Caluff, M. J., Regalado Gabanch, L., Ventosa Rodríguez I., Plasencia Fraga J. M., Baró Oviedo I., González Gutiérrez P. A., Pérez Camacho J., Hechavarría Schwesinger L., González-Oliva L., Catasús Guerra L.J., Padrón Soroa J., Suárez Terán, S. I., Echevarría Cruz, R., Fuentes Marrero, I. M., Rosa Angulo, R., Oriol Rodríguez, P., Bonet Mayedo W., Villate Gómez M., Sánchez Abad N. L., Begué Quiala G., Villaverde López R., Chateloin Torres T., Matos Mederos J., Gómez Fernández R., Acevedo C., Lóriga Piñero J., Romero Jiménez M., Mesa Muñoz I., Vale González A., Leiva Sánchez Á. T., Hernández Valdés J. A., Gómez Campos N. E., Toscano Silva B. L., González Echevarría M. T., Menéndez García A., Chavez Zorrilla M. I. & Torres Cruz M. 2012: Lista nacional de especies de plantas invasoras y potencialmente invasoras en la República de Cuba – 2011. – Bissea 6 (Núm. Espec.1): 22–96. Google Scholar

99.

Pahlevani A. H. & Akhani H. 2011: Seed morphology of Iranian annual species of Euphorbia (Euphorbiaceae). –  Bot. J. Linn. Soc.167: 212–234. Google Scholar

100.

Pahlevani A. H. & Riina R. 2011: A synopsis of Euphorbia subgen. Chamaesyce (Euphorbiaceae) in Iran. –  Ann. Bot. Fenn.48: 304–316. Google Scholar

101.

Parfenov V. I. (ed.) 1999: Opredelitel vysshikh rasteniy Belarusi. – Minsk: Dizayn PRO. Google Scholar

102.

Press J. 1994: Carex L. – Pp. 462–466in: Press J. & Short M. (ed.), Flora of Madeira. – London: National History Museum. Google Scholar

103.

Quézel P. & Contandriopoulos J. 1968: Contribution à l'étude de la flore de Macédoine grecque. – Candollea23: 17–38. Google Scholar

104.

Raab-Straube E. von & Raus Th. (ed.) 2018: Euro+Med-Checklist Notulae, 9 [Notulae ad floram euromediterraneam pertinentes No. 38]. –  Willdenowia48: 195–220. Google Scholar

105.

Raab-Straube E. von & Scholz H. 2013: Bromus arvensis subsp. parviflorus (Desf.) H. Scholz – Pp. 160–161in: Raab-Straube E. von & Raus Th. (ed.), Euro+Med-Checklist Notulae, 1 [Notulae ad floram euro-mediterraneam pertinentes 30]. –  Willdenowia43: 151–164. Google Scholar

106.

Radcliffe-Smith A. 1982: Euphorbia L. – Pp. 571–630in: Davis P. H. (ed.), Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean islands 7. – Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Google Scholar

107.

Randall R. P. 2017: A global compendium of weeds. 3rd Edition. – Perth: R. P. Randall. Google Scholar

108.

Rätzel S., Ristow M. & Uhlich H. 2017: Bemerkungen zu ausgewählten Vertretern der Gattung Phelipanche Pomel im östlichen Mittelmeergebiet mit der Beschreibung von Phelipanche hedypnoidis Rätzel, Ristow & Uhlich, spec. nov. – Carinthia II127: 643–684. Google Scholar

109.

Rauch F. & Weissich P. 2000: Plants for tropical landscapes. – Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press. Google Scholar

110.

Reichert H., Gregor T. & Meierott L. 2018: Euphorbia saratoi (= E. podperae, E. pseudovirgata auct., E. virgata var. orientalis, E. virgultosa) – in Mitteleuropa und Nordamerika ein Neophyt unklarer Herkunft. – Kochia11: 1–36. Google Scholar

111.

Rodríguez-González P., Alburquerque Méndez J. A., Jiménez-Mejías P. & Luceño M. 2010: Carex elata All. ssp. elata, new for Algarve in the lower Guadiana basin. – Acta Bot. Malac.35: 185–186. Google Scholar

112.

Sánchez-Pedraja Ó., Moreno Moral G., Carlón L., Piwowarczyk R., Laínz M. & Schneeweiss G. M. 2016+ [continuously updated]: Index of Orobanchaceae. – Published at  http://www.farmalierganes.com/Otrospdf/publica/Orobanchaceae%20Index.htm [accessed 20 Jan 2019]. Google Scholar

113.

Sanz-Elorza M., Dana E. D. & Sobrino E. 2001: Aproximación al listado de plantas alóctonas invasoras reales y potenciales en España. – Lazaroa22: 121–131. Google Scholar

114.

Schljakov R. N. 1989: Hieracium L. – Pp. 140–300, 378–379in: Tzvelev N. N. (ed.), Flora evropejskoj chasti SSSR 8 [in Russian]. – Leningrad: Nauka, Leningradskoe Otdelenie. Google Scholar

115.

Scholz H. 2003[“2002”]: Wenig bekannte heimische und fremdländische Gräser Deutschlands. – Florist. Rundbr.36: 33–44. Google Scholar

116.

Scholz H. 2008: Die Gattung Bromus (Poaceae) in Mitteleuropa – Synopse und tabellarischer Bestimmungsschlüssel. – Kochia3: 1–18. Google Scholar

117.

Sennikov A. N. 1999: Pervye itogi izucheniya yastrebinok flory Belorussii. [Preliminary results of the study of Hieracium (Asteraceae) in Belarus; in Russian]. – Bot. Zhurn.84(7): 119–128. Google Scholar

118.

Sennikov A. N. 2002: Novye dannye o vidakh roda Hieracium (Asteraceae) v Vitebskofi01_95.gif oblasti Belorussii. [New data on occurrences of Hieracium (Asteraceae) in Vitebsk province of Belarus; in Russian]. – Byull. Moskovsk. Obshch. Isp. Prir., Otd. Biol.107(6): 61. Google Scholar

119.

Sennikov A. N. 2003: Hieracium L. – Pp. 103–144in: Kuusk V., Tabaka L. & Jankevičienė R. (ed.), Flora of the Baltic countries. Compendium of vascular plants 3 [in English and Russian]. – Tartu: Institute of Zoology and Botany. Google Scholar

120.

Silić Č. 1979: Monografija rodova Satureja L., Calamintha Miller, Micromeria Bentham, Acinos Miller i Clinopodium L. u flori Jugoslavije. – Sarajevo: Zemaljski Muzej Bosna i Herzegowina. Google Scholar

121.

SilvaL., PintoN., PressB., RumsayF., CarineM., HendersonS. & SjögrenE.2005: Lista das plantas vasculares (Pteridophyta e Spermatophyta). – Pp. 131–156in: BorgesP. A. V., CunhaR., GabrielR., FriasMartins A., SilvaL. & VieiraV. (ed.), A list of the terrestrial fauna (Mollusca and Arthropoda) and flora (Bryophyta, Pteridophyta and Spermatophyta) from the Azores. – Horta: Governo Regional dos Açores, Direcção Regional do Ambiente; Angra do Heroísmo & Ponta Delgada: Universidade dos Açores. Google Scholar

122.

SîrbuC. & Şuşnia (Tone) I.2018: New records in the alien flora of Romania: Euphorbia serpens and E. glyptosperma. –  J. Pl. Developm.25: 135–144. Google Scholar

123.

Somlyay L. 2009: Occurrence of Chamaesyce glyptosperma, and a survey of the genus Chamaesyce (Euphorbiaceae) in Hungary. – Ann. Hist.-Nat. Mus. Natl. Hung.101: 23–32. Google Scholar

124.

SprengelC. P. J.1826: Systema Vegetabilium, editio decima sexta 3. – Gottingae: Sumtibus Librariae Dieterichianae. Google Scholar

125.

Starr F., Martz K. & Loope L. L. 2002: New plant records for the Hawaiian Archipelago. – Bishop Mus. Occas. Pap.69(2): 16–27. Google Scholar

126.

Steven Ch. von 1809: Decas plantarum, nondum descriptarum Iberiae et Rossiae meridionalis. – Mém. Soc. Imp. Naturalistes Moscou2: 173–183. Google Scholar

127.

StojanovN. & StefanovB.1925: Flora na Bălgarija. – Sofija: Državna pečatnica. Google Scholar

128.

StojanovN., StefanovB. & KitanovB.1967: Flora na Bălgarija, ed. 4, 2. – Sofija: Nauka i iskustvo. Google Scholar

129.

Stoyanov S. & Topalova-Rzerzycha L. 2014: Reports 122–130. – Pp. 120–122in: VladimirovV. & TanK. (ed.), New floristic records in the Balkans 24. – Phytol. Balcan.20: 99–137. Google Scholar

130.

StridA.1997: Cerastium L. – Pp. 198–214in: StridA. & TanK. (ed.), Flora hellenica 1. – Königstein: Koeltz Scientific Books. Google Scholar

131.

StridA.2016: Atlas of the Aegean flora. Part 2: Maps. – Berlin: Botanic Garden and Botanical Museum Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin. – Englera 33(2). Google Scholar

132.

Tamamschjan S. G. 1959: Konizantus – Conyzanthus Tamamsch. – Pp. 185–188in: Komarov V. L. (ed.), Flora SSSR 25. – Moscow & Leningrad: Izdatelstvo Akademii Nauk SSSR. Google Scholar

133.

Theodoropoulos K., Adamidou C., Eleftheriadou E. & Mitsara K. 2011: Phytosociological research of Erica manipuliflora heaths of Xanthi (NE Greece). – Geotechnical Scientific Issues, Ser.6, 21(2): 5–15. – Thessaloniki: Geotechnical Chamber of Greece. Google Scholar

134.

Thulin M., Phillipson P. B. & Wijnands D. O. 1986: Typification of Lobelia erinus L. and Lobelia erinoides L. –  Taxon35: 725–729. Google Scholar

135.

Turner R. J.Jr. & Wasson E. 1997: Botanica.The illustrated A–Z of over 10,000 garden plants and how to cultivate them. – Milsons Point: Random House Australia Pty Ltd. Google Scholar

136.

Tutin T. G., Heywood V. H., Burges N. A., Moore D. M., Valentine D. H., Walters S. M. & Webb D. A. (ed.)1972: Flora europaea 3. Diapensiaceae to Myoporaceae. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

137.

Tyler T. 2004: Reevaluation of the species of Hieracium sect. Hieracium that were described by Hylander from introduced populations in Scandinavian parks. – Ann. Bot. Fenn.41: 103–131. Google Scholar

138.

Tyler T., Karlsson T., Milberg P., Sahlin U. & Sundberg S. 2015: Invasive plant species in the Swedish flora: developing criteria and definitions, and assessing the invasiveness of individual taxa. –  Nordic J. Bot.33: 300–317. Google Scholar

139.

Tzvelev N. N. 1976: Zlaki SSSR. – Leningrad: Nauka, Leningradskoe Otdelenie. Google Scholar

140.

Tzvelev N. N. 2006: Poaceae Barnhart (Gramineae Juss.). – Pp. 248–378in: Takhtajan A. L. (ed.), Konspekt flory Kavkaza 2. – Sankt-Peterburg: Izdatelstvo Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta. Google Scholar

141.

Uotila P. 2011: Moraceae. – In: Euro+Med PlantBase – the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity.– Published at  http://ww2.bgbm.org/EuroPlusMed/PTaxonDetail.asp?NameId=25294&P TRefFk=7300000 [accessed 31 Jan 2019]. Google Scholar

142.

Uotila P. 2011+ [continuously updated]: Chenopodiaceae (pro parte majore). – In: Euro+Med PlantBase – the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. – Published at  http://ww2.bgbm.org/EuroPlusMed/PTaxonDetail.asp?NameId=17702&PTRef Fk=7300000 [accessed 2 Aug 2018]. Google Scholar

143.

USDA-ARS2010: Ficus microcarpa L. f. Chinese banyan.National Genetic Resources Program. Germplasm Resources Information Network – (GRIN) [Online Database].National Germplasm Resources Laboratory, Beltsville, Maryland. – Published at  http://plants.usda.gov/java/profile?symbol=FIMI2 [accessed 31 Jan 2019]. Google Scholar

144.

Valdés B. 2012+ [continuously updated]: Datura wrightii Regel – In: Euro+Med PlantBase – the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. – Published at  http://ww2.bgbm.org/EuroPlusMed/PTaxonDetail.asp?NameId=9000246&PTRefFk= 7100000 [accessed 28 Jan 2019]. Google Scholar

145.

Valdés B. & Scholz H.; with contributions from Raab-Straube E. von & Parolly G. 2009+: Poaceae (pro parte majore). – Euro+Med PlantBase – the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. – Published at  http://ww2.bgbm.org/EuroPlusMed/PtaxonDetail.asp?NameId=136237&PTRef Fk=7100000 [accessed 27 Nov 2018]. Google Scholar

146.

Van Noort S. & Rasplus J. Y. 2018: Figweb: figs and fig wasps checklist of Indo-Australasian Ficus (Moraceae). – Published at  http://www.figweb.org/Ficus/Checklists/Checklist_Indo-Australasian_Ficus.htm [accessed 31 Jan 2019]. Google Scholar

147.

Vandas C. 1905: Additamenta ad floram Macedoniae et Thessaliae. – Magyar Bot. Lapok4: 262–268. Google Scholar

148.

Vandas C. 1909: Reliquiae Formanekianae. Enumeratio critica plantarum vascularium, quas itineribus in Haemo peninsula et Asia Minor (Bithynia) factis col-legit Dr. Ed. Formanek, professor gymnasii Brunensis bohemici. – Brunae: Jelínek. Google Scholar

149.

Velenovský J. 1899: Über Micromeria frivaldskyana Deg. und M. balcanica Vel. –  Österr. Bot. Z.49: 291–292. Google Scholar

150.

Velev S. 1966: Cerastium L. – Pp. 365–388in: Jordanov D. (ed.), Flora na Narodna Republika Bălgarija 3. – Sofija: Izdatelstvo na Bălgarskata akademija na naukite. Google Scholar

151.

Veljić M. M., Rajčević N. F. & Bukvički D. R. 2017: Euphorbia prostrata Aiton (Euphorbiaceae) – an adventive species new in Serbia. – Bot. Serbica41: 95–98. Google Scholar

152.

Verloove F. 2008: Datura wrightii (Solanaceae), a neglected xenophyte, new to Spain. – Bouteloua4: 37–40. Google Scholar

153.

Verloove F. & Reyes-Betancort J. A. 2011: Additions to the flora of Tenerife (Canary Islands, Spain). –  Collect. Bot. (Barcelona)30: 63–78. Google Scholar

154.

Visiani R. de 1830: Plantae dalmaticae nunc primum editae. – Flora13: 49–53. Google Scholar

155.

Vladimirov V., Petrova A. S. & Assyov B. 2014: Euphorbia prostrata – a new alien species to the Bulgarian flora. – Dokl. Bulg. Akad. Nauk67: 527–532. Google Scholar

156.

Voliotis D. 1983: Zur Flora des Tzena-Gebirges in NordGriechenland. – Acta Bot. Croat.42: 157–172. Google Scholar

157.

WCSP2019: World checklist of selected plant families. – Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. – Published at  http://wcsp.science.kew.org/ [accessed 23 Jan 2019]. Google Scholar

158.

Webb P. B. & Berthelot S. 1845 [1844–1850]: Histoire naturelle des Iles Canaries 3 [Botanique]. 2, Phytographia canariensis, section 3 (CampanulaceaeEquisetaceae). – Paris: Béthune, etc. Google Scholar

159.

Weeds of Australia2017: Biosecurity Queensland Edition. Fact Sheet Index – Published at  http://keyserver.lucidcentral.org/weeds/data/media/Html/index.htm [accessed 29 Jan 2019]. Google Scholar

160.

Whitehead F. H. 1993: Cerastium L. (annual species). – Pp. 164–175in: Tutin T. G., Burges N. A., Chater A. O., Edmondson J. R., Heywood V. H., Moore D. M., Valentine D. H., Walters S. M. & Webb D. A. (ed.), Flora europaea, ed. 2, 1. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

161.

Yena A. V. 2012: Prirodnaya flora Krymskogo poluostrova. – Simferopol: N. Orianda. Google Scholar

162.

Zeddam A. & Raus Th. 2010: Parthenocissus quinquefolia (L.) Planch. – P. 199in: Greuter W. & Raus Th. (ed.), Med-Checklist Notulae, 29. –  Willdenowia40: 189–204. Google Scholar

163.

Zernov A. S. 2006: Flora Severo-Zapadnogo Kavkaza. – Moskva: Tovarishchestvo nauchnykh izdaniy KMK. Google Scholar
© 2019 The Authors · This open-access article is distributed under the CC BY 4.0 licence
Eckhard Von Raab-Straube and Thomas Raus "Euro+Med-Checklist Notulae, 10," Willdenowia 49(1), 95-115, (17 April 2019). https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.49.49111
Received: 10 August 2018; Accepted: 27 February 2019; Published: 17 April 2019
JOURNAL ARTICLE
21 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top