Open Access
Translator Disclaimer
1 December 1996 Heterochrony and Neotenic Salamanders: Possible Clues for Understanding the Animal Development and Evolution
Masami Wakahara
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

A synthesis of developmental genetics with evolutionary genetics is now making possible to understand significant evolutionary changes in multicellular organisms. The key concept for unifying the two must be heterochrony. Heterochrony causes evolutionary modifications due to changes in timing and/or rate of development. The heterochrony is conventionally categorized into three patterns as neoteny (retardation in somatic development), progenesis (acceleration in gonadal development), and direct development (acceleration in somatic development, resulting in lack of larval or tadpole stages). A lot of species showing neoteny are known in urodeles, but not in anurans. Neotenic urodeles are also divided into three categories; permanent or obligate, “inducible” obligate, and facultative neotenies. Hynobius retardatus, a specific population of which had been reported to show neoteny but is believed to be extinct at present, has become to be used for experimental analysis of heterochronic expression of several adult characters during its ontogeny. Gonadal maturation and a transition of globin subunits from larval to adult types have been shown to occur independently on the morphological metamorphosis in H. retardatus. Mechanisms underlying the heterochrony, including morphogenetic clock, heterochronic genes in Drosophila and C. elegans, temporal colinearity in Hox gene complex in mice, and atavistic transformation induced by altered expression of Hox genes are discussed in terms of current molecular biology.

1. INTRODUCTION

In the last chapter of “Developmental Biology (4th ed.)” by S. F. Gilbert (1994), one of the most reliable and world-famous text book on current developmental biology, Gilbert has stated that “we are at a remarkable point in our understanding of nature, for a synthesis of developmental genetics with evolutionary biology may transform our appreciation of the mechanisms underlying evolutionary change and animal diversity.” In other words, current progress in molecular biology has led us to the verge of a merger of the developmental genetics (i.e., synthesis of molecular biology with developmental biology) and the evolutionary genetics (i.e., synthesis of population genetics with evolutionary biology). The synthesis of these long-separated strands of biology may produce a developmental genetic theory capable of explaining the ontogeny and phylogeny, one of the biggest, unsolved problems in biology (Gould, 1977). Recent progress in this field has been reviewed by Akam et al. (1994) and Gilbert et al. (1996).

Developmental genetics has intensively analyzed the molecular basis for a construction of gross body plan, pattern formation, morphogenesis, cell differentiation, metamorphosis and aging in multicellular organisms. On the other hand, evolutionary genetics will discuss the molecular basis for macroevolution, microevolution, speciation, atavistic transformation and animal diversity (biodiversity) on our earth (Akam et al., 1994; Holland and Garcia-Fernàndez, 1996; Valentine et al., 1996). What is the common factor or parameter involved in these two phenomena, developmental and evolutionary changes ? Because the developmental changes must be considered as a function of a relatively shorter period of the ontogeny and the evolutionary changes have occurred during an enormously longer period of history of the earth (Gilbert et al., 1996), the common parameter between develop-mental and evolutionary biology must be time, whatever shorter or longer it is. Thus, the key concept for unifying the develop-mental and evolutionary genetics must be heterochrony. In this review, I will discuss what is the heterochrony, how is gene expression chronologically regulated, and what kind of animals should be studied as a model system for elucidating the heterochrony involved in ontogeny and phylogeny.

2. HETEROCHRONY

Changes in developmental timing (heterochrony) are considered to be important in producing morphological changes during evolution (Gould, 1977; Akam et al., 1994; Richardson, 1995). Heterochrony causes evolutionary modifications due to changes in timing and/or rate of development. During evolution, ancestral juvenile characters may be retained by later ontogenetic stages of descendents due to a reduced rate of morphological development and/or a delayed onset of growth in the embryos, as well as precocious sexual maturation. According to classical concepts on the ontogeny and phytogeny (e.g., acceleration, retardation, reiteration and so on, see Gould, 1977), heterochrony which is important for unifying the developmental biology and evolutionary biology is conventionally categorized into (1) neoteny (retardation in somatic development), (2) progenesis (acceleration in germ cell development), and (3) direct development (acceleration in somatic development, and resulting in lack of larval stages).

2–1. Neoteny

In neoteny, somatic development is retarded while gonadal development including germ cell maturation normally occurs. In urodeles, a lot of species to show neoteny have been known (Lynn, 1961; Dent, 1968; Gould, 1977; Armstrong and Malacinski, 1989). In anurans, however, neotenic species have never been reported (Lynn, 1961), except for experi-mental induction of gonadal maturation by goitrogen treatment (Hanaoka, 1954; Jurand, 1955).

There has been an old hypothesis that neotenic development involves an appearance of novel groups of animals (or phyla) with different body plans during evolution (see Gould, 1977). For instances, the larvae of certain tunicates could have evolved into chordates such as amphioxus, and a myriapod-like ancestor into insects by neotenic development. Molecular basis of the origin and evolution of chordates has recently been reviewed (Satoh and Jeffery, 1995; Satoh, 1995; Holland and Garcia-Fernàndez, 1996).

A lot of neotenic characters of human beings have sufficiently been accumulated and possible involvement of neoteny in the evolution of us has been stressed by Montagu (1981). Extraordinary similarity in the morphological characters between infants but dissimilarity in adults of human and chimpanzees convincingly provides an idea that heterochronic modifications brought about the phenotypic differences between the two.

2–2. Progenesis

In progenesis, gonadal maturation is accelerated while the rest of the body develops normally to a certain stage. The most conspicuous progenesis has been known in insects which propagate enormously during shorter period of their lives (Gould, 1977).

In amphibians, species showing progenesis are rather few. Bolistoglossa occidentalis is a tropical salamander that, unlike other members of its genus, lives in trees. This salamander has webbed feet and small body size that suit it for arboreal existence, the webbed feet producing suction for climbing and the small body size making such traction efficient. Alberch and Alberch (1981) have shown that B. occidentalis resembles juveniles of the related species B. subpalmata and B. rostrata (whose young are small, with digits that have not yet grown past their webbing). St is thought that B. occidentalis became a sexually mature size at a much smaller size than its predecessors. This gave it a phenotype that made tree-dwelling a possibility. Progenesis, thus, has enabled some salamander species to find new ecological nitches.

2–3. Direct development

In ordinary frogs, their lives are divided into aquatic larval (tadpole) stages and terrestrial adulthood (Hourdry, 1993a, b). Morphological and biochemical alterations from larval to adult forms are induced by thyroid hormones (Weber, 1967; Frieden, 1981; Rosenkilde, 1985). The direct development means lack of the tadpole stages in frogs.

Eleutherodactylus nubicola of Jamaica (Lynn, 1961) is a representative of frogs showing the direct development in which the aquatic larval period and most of the larval characters are eliminated (Dent, 1968). Frogs of the genus Cornufer also have essentially direct development (Fig. 1A). The eggs of Eleutherodactylus are large (3.0-4.0 mm in diameter) and covered by several dense jelly layers. Despite the large amount of stored yolk, cleavage is holoblastic, gastrulation is initiated at a subequatorial position, and the neural folds became elevated from the surface. However, shortly after the neural tube closes, limb buds appear on the surface. This early emergence of limb buds is the first indication that development is direct and will not pass through a limbless tadpole stage. Moreover, the emergence of the limbs is not dependent upon thyroid hormones (Lynn and Peadon, 1955). What emerges from the egg jelly three weeks after fertilization is not a tadpole but a little frog (Fig. 1B). Such direct-developing frogs do not need ponds from their larval stages and can therefore colonize new regions inaccessible to other frogs.

Fig. 1.

Dorsal views of a “neurula“ embryo and a “froglet“ just after hatching, of frogs which show a direct development. (A) Cornufer pelewensis, showing four limb buds and large yolk mass. Redrawn from Dent (1968). (B) Eleutherodactylus nubicola, eight hours after hatching. Redrawn from Lynn (1961).

i0289-0003-13-6-765-f1.gif

In sea urchins, several species are known to show direct development in which the pluteus larval stages are suppressed while the development of the adult rudiment is accelerating (Raff and Wray, 1989; Raff, 1992).

3. NEOTENIC URODELES

In certain urodeles, sexual maturity occurs in what is usually considered a larval state. The reproductive system (and germ cells) mature, while the rest of the body retains its juvenile form throughout its life. The neotenic urodeles have been divided into three categories according to their ability of metamorphosis; permanent or obligate neoteny which cannot metamorphose at all in both natural and experimental conditions, “inducible” obligate neoteny which cannot metamorphose in nature but can metamorphose after treatment with thyroid hormones, and facultative neoteny which metamorphose depending on the environmental conditions (Frieden, 1981). Table 1 shows a summary of degrees of neoteny among the urodeles.

Table 1.

Degree of neoteny among urodeles1

i0289-0003-13-6-765-t1.gif

3–1. Permament (or obligate) neoteny

Most striking are the members of the family Proteidae, the blind European cave salamander Proteus and the American mudpuppy Necturus. These two salamanders retain larval characteristics as adults with nothing that can be designated as a metamorphosis. Although simple lungs develop, the external gills remain large and functional, the eyes are lidless, the tailfins are not resorbed, the skull shows little ossification, no maxillary bones ever appear, and the visceral arches and skin are larval in character (Lynn, 1961). Members of the Sirenidae, the genera Siren and Pseudobranchus, may be considered permanent neoteny with just a few adult characters. Larval gills and tailfins are retained, neither maxillary bones nor eyelids are ever formed. However, the skin undergoes a typical metamorphosis to attain the usual adult type of structure. This indicates that degrees of the retardation of somatic developments could be tissue- or organ-specific.

The permanent neotenic species of Necturus and Siren remain unresponsive to thyroid hormones, though their hypophyseal-thyroidal system seems to be normal (Frieden, 1981). In other words, these animals never metamorphose even though they have thyroid hormones in their blood stream. In this respect, Yaoita and Brown (1990) reported that the mRNA for thyroid hormone receptor β is absent in Necturus and thus cannot be induced by T3.

3–2. “Inducible” obligate neoteny

The most famous “inducible” obligate neoteny is of Ambystoma mexicanum, whose neotenic form is called axolotl, originally from a Spanish word ajolote which means “water slave” or preferably “water dog” (Smith, 1989). In the axolotl which has originally been found in Lake Xochimilco in Mexico, a lot of mutants have been isolated and provided to inves- tigators (Malacinski and Brothers, 1974; Malacinski, 1978), and have long been employed for experimental embryology and developmental genetics.

Neoteny in the axolotl is caused by homozygosity for a single recessive gene. Dominant allele causing physical metamorphosis is found in the closely related species, Ambystoma tigrinum, with which it can hybridize (Tompkins, 1978). Despite the failure of axolotls to undergo morphological metamorphosis, they do undergo a cryptic or “biochemical” metamorphosis: transition of globin subunits (Ducibella, 1974) and some serum protein changes (Nussbaum, 1976) from larval to adult types occur on almost the same time schedule as A. tigrinum does, indicating a possibility of a separation of morphological and biochemical metamorphoses in the axolotl.

Although the axolotl never metamorphose in its native habitat in Mexico or under laboratory conditions, morphological metamorphosis can be induced by a single injection of thyroxine or by immersion of thyroxine solution (Prahlad and DeLanney, 1965; Tompkins and Townsend, 1977), and by a daily injection of thryoid stimulating hormone (TSH) (Taurog, 1974). Similarly to the axolotl, Eurycea tynerensis, E. neotenes, and Gyrinophilus palleucus cannot metamorphose in nature, but are able to induce metamorphosis by treating with thyroid hormones or TSH.

3–3. Facultative neoteny

It has long been known that specimens of Ambystoma tigrinum living in some of high lakes of the Rocky Mountains may fail to metamorphose, generation after generation, passing without the appearance of a typical adult. On the other hand, members of the same species living in other localities, exhibit normal metamorphosis (Lynn, 1961; Dent, 1968; Sprules, 1974a). Thus, this type of neoteny is called facultative. Their failure to metamorphose under normal conditions could be explained either by some deficiency in the anima's production of thyroid hormone, or by a failure of the thyroid gland to become active and release its hormone into the blood stream (Dent, 1968; Morris, 1980). Indeed, the thyroid glands in Hynobius retardatus reared at 4°C are reported to be completely inactive (Moriya, 1983a), and thyroid hormones are believed to be insensitive at the lower temperature (Moriya, 1983b). European species, Triturus taeniatus and T. cristatus, which had become world-famous newts by Spemann's monumental works on organizer (Spemann, 1936), belong to this type of neoteny.

A particular population of Hynobius retardatus has been reported to show neoteny in a specific environment of Lake Kuttara, a small volcanous lake in Hokkaido, Japan (Sasaki, 1924; Makino, 1934; Sasaki and Nakamura, 1937). Unfortunately, however, the neotenic population in Lake Kuttara is believed to be extinct at present. Since it was reported that the neotenic individuals of H. retardatus which had been captured at Lake Kuttara metamorphosed under the laboratory condition (Sasaki, 1924), it is reasonable to assume that the neoteny in Hynobius must be a facultative neoteny, in which animals metamorphose depending on the environments. The adaptive and evolutionary ecological significance of facultative neoteny in salamanders has been discussed in many species (Sprules, 1974a, b; Tilley, 1973; Wilber, 1971; Neish, 1971).

4. HYNOBIUS RETARDATUS AS A MODEL ANIMAL

We have recently demonstrated that H. retardatus can produce morphologically mature spermatozoa even in larval forms with well developed gills and tailfins when the metamorphosis is arrested by goitrogens (Wakahara, 1994; Yamaguchi et al., 1996), and that a transition of globin subunits from larval to adult types occurs even in the metamorphosis-arrested larvae (Arai and Wakahara, 1993; Wakahara et al., 1994). These findings suggest that the gonadal development and certain biochemical alterations from larval to adult types will be independent on the morphological metamorphosis in this species. In other words, it seems possible to induce neoteny in H. retardatus under certain experimental conditions.

4–1. Chronological separation between gonadal and somatic developments

When the larvae of H. retardatus were reared in goitrogens, morphological metamorphosis was substantially inhibited, and the aged larvae still remained in aquatic habitat (Arai and Wakahara, 1993; Wakahara, 1994). Histological observation revealed that the gonadal development was extraordinarily accelerated in the metamorphosis-arrested larvae compared with the normal controls (Fig. 2). The metamorphosis-arrested larvae produced morphologically mature spermatozoa approximately 5 months after hatching, when the gonads in the controls began to differentiate into testes, or to show the premeiotic proliferation of germ cells (Fig. 3). This precocious maturation of gonads induced by goitrogen treatment, however, may correspond to the progenesis (acceleration in germ cell development) rather than the neoteny (retardation of somatic development). Whatever the mechanism of this phenomenon is (Yamaguchi et al., 1996), this observation convincingly demonstrates that the gonadal development including germ cell maturation is controlled by different chronological regulation from the somatic development in this species.

Fig. 2.

Testicular development in normally metamorphosing and metamorphosed Hynobius retardatus (open circles, broken line) and in goitrogen-treated, metamorphosis-arrested larvae (closed circles, solid line). The ordinate (testicular index) shows relative average sectional area of each testis in a logarythmic scale. Each point shows a value in one individual. Asterisks on the right show the degree of the testicular development in ordinary adult males at the breeding season. Arrowheads indicate the testes with morphologically mature spermatozoa. From Wakahara (1994).

i0289-0003-13-6-765-f2.gif

Fig. 3.

Histology of developing testes in H. retardatus: a goitrogen-treated larva (A) and a control (B) at 220 days after hatching, at the same magnification. A lot of bundles of spermatozoa with densely stained heads and moderately stained tails are observed in the testis of the goitrogen-treated larva but not of the control. Delafield's hematoxylin and eosin stain. Bar, 400 μm.

i0289-0003-13-6-765-f3.gif

4–2. Larval and adult skin

Extensive reconstruction of skin occurs during amphibian metamorphosis (Yoshizato, 1989, 1992). Changes in skin (epidermal and dermal) cells have been described in several anuran species (Heady and Kollros, 1964; Fox, 1985; Robinson and Heintzelman, 1987; Izutsu et al., 1993; Amano et al., 1995). On the other hand, the transition of larval to adult types of skin in neotenic urodeles is a little more complicated; e.g., the skin undergoes a typical metamorphosis to attain the usual adult type of structure in some neotenic salamanders, while the external gills and dorsal tailfins still remain larval type (Lynn, 1961; Dent, 1968).

Typical larval skin in H. retardatus is entirely composed of an epidermis which is mainly occupied with Leydig's cells (Fig. 4A), epidermal specific cells in urodeles (Kelly, 1966). On the other hand, adult skin is composed of an epidermis which is predominantly occupied by stratified squamous cells, and of dermal tissues which consist of two types of dermal glands, mucous and serous glands (Fig. 4B). The mucous gland is composed of several gland cells, a central cavity and a duct opening to body surface. The serous gland is also composed of several gland cells which contain secretory granules of various size. It has recently been reported that the epidermis and dermis are differently regulated during the metamorphosis in H. retardatus (Wakahara and Yamaguchi, 1996).

Fig. 4.

Histology of head skins of normal controls (A and B) and of goitrogen-treated, metamorphosis-arrested larvae (C) in H. retardatus. (A) Typical larva (25 days after hatching). The skin is almost composed of an epidermis which is mainly occupied with Leydig's cells. (B) Typical adult (sexually mature male). The skin is composed of an epidermis which consists of stratified squamous cells and a dermis which is occupied with well developed dermal glands; mucous and serous galnds. (C) Metamorphosis-arrested larvae at 270 days after hatching. Leydig's cells are still main constituents of the epidermis and well developed dermal glands occupy the dermis. L, Leydig's cell; m, mucous gland; s, serous gland. Hematoxylin-eosin stain. Bar indicates 100 μm.

i0289-0003-13-6-765-f4.gif

4–3. Heterochrony in epidermal and dermal development

Figure 5 shows developmental changes in Leydig's cells in the epidermis and in dermal glands in the controls and metamorphosis-arrested larvae of H. retardatus. The Leydig's cells are main constituents of larval epidermis, and thus already observed at the hatching stage. They develop thereafter during the premetamorphic stage. Leydig's cells in the controls gradually disappear from the epidermis and are replaced by stratified squamous cells during the metamorphosis. On the one hand, they are well developed in the metamorphosis-arrested larvae during the period when the controls are metamorphosing and metamorphosed (Fig. 5A). At the end of the experiment, Leydig's cells are still main constituents of the epidermis in the metamorphosis-arrested larvae (Fig. 4C).

Fig. 5.

Developmental fates of Leydig's cells in the epidermis (A) and of mucous glands in the dermis (B) of H. retardatus: normal controls (open circles) and metamorphosis-arrested larvae (closed circles). The developmental fates of both cells types are differently regulated even though they constitute the same skin. Redrawn from Wakahara and Yamaguchi (1996).

i0289-0003-13-6-765-f5.gif

The dermal glands begin to be observed 25 days after hatching, and then develop rapidly during the metamorphic stages in the controls. After the metamorphosis, they are major constituents of the dermal tissues (Fig. 4B). In the metamorphosis-arrested larvae, however, these glands are not observed during the period when the controls are metamorphosing (Fig. 5B). They are firstly observed at 100 days after hatching, when the controls have completely metamorphosed. At the end of the experiment, morphological properties and the degree of development of these glands in the metamorphosis-arrested larvae (Fig. 4C) are identical to those in the controls (Fig. 4B). Thus, the aged metamorphosis-arrested larvae have skin which consists of “larval” epidermis (mainly occupied with Leydig's cells) and “adult” dermis (mainly occupied with two types of dermal glands).

4–4. Changes in globin subunits

A changeover from a larva! or foetal form of hemoglobin to an adult form is a frequent phenomenon in vertebrates (MacLean and Jurd, 1972). In anurans, a switch in hemoglobin synthesis is reported to occur at metamorphosis, resulting in the replacement of the larval globin subunits by a set of distinct adult ones (Cardellini and Sala, 1979; Hosbach et al., 1982). This event, therefore provides a useful model for investigating the developmental and/or chronological control of gene expression (Banville and Williams, 1985a, b; Widmer et at., 1981).

In the axolotl, the transition of globin subunits from larval to adult types occurs without any indication of anatomical metamorphosis (Ducibella, 1974; MacLean and Jurd, 1971; Jurd, 1985). Similarly to this, in metamorphosis-arrested larvae of H. retardatus, the transition of hemoglobins occurs on the same time schedule as in the controls (Fig. 6), suggesting that the transition is completely independent on the morpho-logical metamorphosis (Arai and Wakahara, 1993; Wakahara et al., 1994; Wakahara and Yamaguchi, 1996).

Fig. 6.

Transitions of globin subunits from larval to adult types in normally metamorphosing H. retardatus (open circles) and metamorphosis-arrested larvae (closed circles). Chronological patterns of the globin transition are almost identical even in the controls and metamorphosis-arrested larvae. Inset; Electrophoregram of globin subunits on SDS-PAGE. L, typical larva; M, metamorphosing larva; A, typical adult. Proportion of L1 to total globins are caliculated using computerized image analizer (NIH-Image). From Wakahara and Yamaguchi (1996).

i0289-0003-13-6-765-f6.gif

5. CHRONOLOGICAL REGULATION OF GENE EXPRESSION

Many mechanisms for producing heterochrony have been proposed and reviewed (Raff and Wray, 1989; Satoh, 1990). Work on invertebrates has identified genes which may be involved in the control of developmental timing. The lin-14 gene of Caenorhabditis elegans (Ambros and Horvitz, 1984; Ruvkun and Giusto, 1989) and the period gene in Drosophila (Konopka, 1987) are good examples of the heterochronic genes. In silkworm embryos, a “timer” enzyme which might determine the duration of diapause has been reported (Kai et al., 1995, 1996).

Little is known about the control of developmental timing in vertebrates, although several cell-autonomous mechanisms have been proposed (Cooke and Smith, 1990; Satoh, 1982, 1985, 1990). Temporal regulation of genes encoded globin subunits in chicken and mammals must be the most excellent example for the control of developmental timing in vertebrates (Choi and Engel, 1988; Engel, 1993). In the mouse, disruption of the Hoxd-13 gene has effects on limb development which have been interpreted as heterochronic (Dollé et al., 1993).

5–1. Morphogenetic clock

DNA replication cycles and nuclear-cytoplasmic ratio may be responsible for a “developmental” or morphogenetic clock. One example of the developmental clock has been described in early development of ascidian embryos (Satoh, 1982, 1985). The timing of events during the early development of ascidian embryos is not mediated by chronological time or elapsed time since fertilization, but is likely related to the number of cell division cycles (Satoh, 1990).

The onset of midblastula transition (MBT) in amphibian embryos (Newport and Kirschner, 1982) is another example of the morphogenetic clock. It can be manipulated by ligating off a region of egg cytoplasm, thus altering the ratio of nuclear material to inherited store of regulator. Such ligation does not, however, affect numbers of cells, and at different times after the MBT, in experimental and control embryos (Kobayakawa and Kubota, 1981). It seems unlikely that the cell-autonomous timing mechanism is involved in the longer-term changes in ontogeny, and thus unsuitable for later development such as metamorphosis and gonadal maturation. These are more likely to involve cumulative effects of feedback processes at hormonal and tissue levels of organization (Cooke and Smith, 1990).

5–2. Time-keeping enzyme

Another type of the developmental clock which is involved in the longer-term changes in ontogeny must be related to a direct function of protein or enzyme itself. EA4, a DNA-dependent ATPase in silkworm (Bombyx mori) embryos, has been reported to act as a timer for determining the duration of diapause in the silkworm (Kai et al., 1995). The period of cold indispensable for the resumption of embryonic development in diapausing eggs coincides with the period of cold storage required for the ATPase activation of EA4 in vivo and in vitro. EA4 has been reported to possess some sort of time-measuring activity. Recent study by Isobe et al. (1995) has shown that the resumption of arrested development in the silkworm at the embryonic stage is parallel to the activation of TIME (Time-Interval-Measuring-Esterase), which initially exists as complex form with PIN peptide. TIME-PIN complex dissociates by exposing to low temperatures, and thier dissociation from it triggers a conformational change which results in the activation of EA4 as a timer (Kai et al., 1996).

Unfortunately, however, this type of enzyme which acts as a timer has not been found in other organisms.

5–3. Heterochronic genes

It has long been postulated that the temporal control of developmental events may be genetically controlled within embryos. In this respect, several heterochronic mutants which affect only the temporal sequence of cell fates, but not the formation of spatial patterns, have been isolated in Caenorhabditis elegans (Ambros and Horvitz, 1984, 1987). Recessive mutations of lin-14 in C. elegans, e.g., lin-14 (n536 n540) cause the precocious expression of specific develop-mental events.

Other heterochronic genes identified in invertebrates are period (per) in Drosophila (Konopka, 1987), and frequency (frq) in the fungus Neurospora (McClung et al., 1989), both of these affect the circadian biological clocks. Sequence analysis of these genes allowed the identification of a common element between frq and per which, given the background similarities in their classical genetic characteristics, suggests the possibility of a common element in the clock mechanisms of these two organisms. Similar mutations have been found in mouse (Takahashi et al., 1994; Vitaterna et al., 1994) and hamster (Ralph and Menaker, 1988; Loudon et al., 1994). Unfortunately, however, such single mutations affecting the circadian rhythm in vertebrates have not been proved to affect on the specific developmental events during their ontogeny.

5–4. Temproral colinearity

Temporal colinearity in the expression of Hox genes could provide a mechanism for marking time, particularly with respect to limb development and maturation along the primary axis (Duboule, 1994). Figure 7 shows schematic illustration of Hox gene complex in amphioxus and mouse. Vertebrate Hox genes are sequentially activated during the morphogenesis and pattern formation. The anterior-posterior succession in the topography of the Hox gene expression domains may depend on the 3′- to 5′-arrangement of the genes. A delay is observed in the appearance of the transcripts encoded by the more 5′-located genes; for example, Hoxd-13 transcripts appear after those encoded by Hoxd-10. The rule is that one can never detect transcripts from a given Hox gene before transcripts are produced by its 3′-located neighbour in the complex. This implies that physical ordering of the genes along their complexes reflects the temporal sequence of their activation (Dollé et al., 1989; Izpisúa-Belmonte et al., 1991). This phenomenon, referred to as temporal colinearity, suggests that a part of mechanisms of chronological expression of the specific genes may be involved in the evolutionarily cumulative genomic structure itself.

Fig. 7.

Suggested evolutionary relationship bewteen mammalian and amphioxus Hox gene clusters. The amphioxus Hox gene cluster has an archetypal organization in relation to the vertebrate clusters. Modified from Holland and Garcia-Fernàndez (1996). Vertebrate Hox genes are sequentially activated during the morphogenesis and pattern formation, and thus, the physical ordering of the genes along their complexes will reflect the temporal sequence of their activation.

i0289-0003-13-6-765-f7.gif

5–5. Atavistic transformation

Atavism, i.e. an accidental expression of ancestral characters in descendents, is oftenly observed in a variety of animals (Gould, 1977). The atavistic transformation is considered to be a result from slight changes in regulatory elements responsible for the chronological gene expression, and thus provides some clues for elucidating the structure of genes involved in heterochrony and possible genomic changes during evolution. Recent progress in molecular biology on the morphogenetic genes including Hox gene complex makes possible to induce an atavistic transformation by knock out or overexpression of the specific genes (Duboule, 1994).

In Hoxd-13 deficient mice, which have been made using the approach of gene disruption via homologous recombination, some phenotypec traits are suggestive of atavism; for example, an increase in the number of carpal bones of the distal row that is thought to be closer to the ancestral tetrapod (Dollé et al., 1993). Another example of atavism in Hox-deficient mice is the phenotype observed in mice lacking a functional Hoxa-2 gene (Rijli et al., 1993). in these animals, homeotic-like transformations of the skeletal elements derived from the second branchial arch are observed and remodelling of bones in the middle ear has led to the appearance of a bone resembling a pterygoquadrate element, a bone that is found in reptiles, but not in mammals. The temporal colinearity in the expression of Hox genes and the atavistic transformation induced by an artificial modification of their expression are consistent with the idea that the history of animals is chronologically or sequentially engraved on the genomic structure.

6. TENTATIVE MODEL FOR NEOTENY

As described above, there are a lot of neotenic species in urodeles but not in anurans. This implies that these two different groups of amphibians will show different heterochrony in the development of their germ cells and somatic cells. Because one of the most conspicuous difference between urodeles and anurans is in their modes of germ cell formation; an early segregation of germ cells from soma in anurans and later induction in urodeles (see Nieuwkoop and Sutasurya, 1979; Wakahara, 1996), the difference in their modes of germ cell formation will reflect their ability of heterochrony. Furthermore, there is another heterochrony between anurans and urodeles; e.g., forelimb development occurs much earlier than hindlimb development in urodeles, while the hindlimbs develop earlier than forelimbs in anurans (Richardson, 1995). These differences in heterochrony will explain the predominance of neoteny in urodeles but not in anurans.

6-1. Germ cell formation in anurans and urodeles

In urodeles, primordial germ cells (PGCs) are morphologically recognized at first in the early tailbud embryos. The PGCs which locate within the lateral plate mesoderm are induced through as part of the regional induction of the mesoderm by the vegetal yolk endoderm (Kotani, 1957, 1958; Sutasurya and Nieuwkoop, 1974; Michael, 1984). Contrary to this, the PGCs in anurans are preformistically established much earlier than in urodeles under the certain influences of the germ plasm (Smith, 1966; Wakahara, 1977, 1978). Because all germ cells, once established, show virtually identical behavior, regardless of whether different modes of germ cell formation are employed, the basic mechanism of the germ cell formation and differentiation in all animals could be similar at the molecular levels, except for the timing of establishment of the germ cell line (see Wakahara, 1990a, b, 1996).

Assuming that germ cell formation in all the animals requires the expression of a series of genes which constitute a cascade and show complex interactions of those gene products as in Drosophila (see Lehmann and Ephrussi, 1994), the different modes of germ cell formation could be explained in terms of spatio-temporal gene expression (Fig. 8). For the convenience of explanation, all the genes that may be involved in germ cell formation could be classified into three categories: class I genes may function in the pattern (or spatial) specification in the germ cell formation (e.g., cappucino, spire, and stauten in Drosophila), class II genes may regulate the assembly of germ plasm components (e.g., oskar, vasa and tudor in Drosophila), and class III genes may control the germ cell segregation from the soma and the migration of the germ cells (germ-cell-less and mitochondrial large ribosomal RNA gene in Drosophila).

Fig. 8.

A model for the temporal gene expression in germ cell formation in urodeles (A) and anurans (B). Class I genes which are corresponding to cappucino, spire and stauten in Drosophila, may function in the pattern specification in the germ cell formation. Class II genes which are corresponding to oskar, vasa and tudor, may regulate the assembly of germ plasm components; and Class III genes corresponding to germ-cell-less and mitochondrial large-ribosomal RNA gene in Drosophila, may control the germ cell segregation from the soma and the migration of the germ cells. In anurans, the Class I and II genes are expressed during the oogenesis, much earlier than in urodeles. The heterochronic expression of these genes will explain the different patterns of the germ cell formation in anurans and urodeles.

i0289-0003-13-6-765-f8.gif

6–2. Heterochronic genes in amphibians

The preformistic mode in anurans implies a much earlier expression of the genes: possibly all the genes of the class I and II may be maternally expressed. The localization of germ plasm is considered to be a cytoplasmic manifestation of factors preformed during oogenesis as a result of the maternal expression of class I and II genes. In urodeles, neither the class I nor class II genes may be expressed before fertilization. Instead, they are first expressed during early embryogenesis under the influences of certain mesodermal inducer molecules.

Heterochronic genes which could exist on the upstream of the cascade of a series of genes involved in the germ cell formation and govern the expression of the class I and II genes, will explain the difference in the timing of germ cell formation between anurans and urodeles. Although such heterochronic genes in vertebrates have not been found yet, subtraction screening of genes between urodeles and anurans, or more specifically between neotenic urodeles and anurans of direct development will be promising.

REFERENCES

1.

M. Akam, P. Holland, P. Ingham, and G. Wray . 1994. Eds. The Evolution of Developmental Mechanisms. The Company of Biologists Ltd. Cambridge. Google Scholar

2.

P. Alberch and J. Alberch . 1981. Heterochronic mechanisms of morphological diversification and evolutionary change in the neotropical salamander, Bolitoglossa occidentalis (Amphibia: Plethodontidae). J Morph 167:249–264. Google Scholar

3.

T. Amano, H. Kawabata, and K. Yoshizato . 1995. Characterization of metamorphic changes in anuran larval epidermis using lectins as probes. Devel Growth Differ 37:211–220. Google Scholar

4.

V. Ambros and H. R. Horvitz . 1984. Heterochronic mutants of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Science 226:409–416. Google Scholar

5.

V. Ambros and H. R. Horvitz . 1987. The lin-14 locus of Caenorhabditis elegans controls the time of expression of specific postembryonic developmental events. Genes Dev 1:398–414. Google Scholar

6.

T. Arai and M. Wakahara . 1993. Hemoglobin transitions from larval to adult types in normally metamorphosing, metamorphosed and metamorphosis-arrested Hynobius retardatus. Zool Sci 10:637–644. Google Scholar

7.

J. B. Armstrong and G. M. Malacinski . 1989. Eds. Developmental Biology of the Axolotl. Oxford Univ Press. Oxford. Google Scholar

8.

D. Banville and J. C. Williams . 1985a. Developmental changes in the pattern of larval β-globin gene expression in Xenopus laevis. Identification of two early larval β-globin mRNA sequences. J Mol Biol 184:611–620. Google Scholar

9.

D. Banville and J. C. Williams . 1985b. The pattern of expression on the Xenopus laevis tadpole α-globin genes and the amino acid sequence of the three major tadpole α-globin polypeptides. Nucl Acids Res 13:5407–5421. Google Scholar

10.

R. A. Brandon 1989. Natural history of the axolotl and its relationship to other Ambystomatid salamanders. In Developmental Biology of the Axolotl. Ed by J. B. Armstrong and G. M. Malacinski . Oxford Univ Press. Oxford. pp. 13–21. Google Scholar

11.

P. Cardellini and M. Sala . 1979. Metamorphic variations in the hemoglobins of Bombina variegata (L). Comp Biochem Physiol 64B:113–116. Google Scholar

12.

O-R. Choi and J. D. Engel . 1988. Developmental regulation of β-globin gene switching. Cell 55:17–26. Google Scholar

13.

J. Cooke and J. C. Smith . 1990. Measurement of developmental time by cells of early embryos. Cell 60:891–894. Google Scholar

14.

J. N. Dent 1968. Survey of amphibian metamorphosis. In Metamorphosis. Ed by W. Etkin and L. I. Gilbert . North-Holland Publ Co. Amsterdam. pp. 271–311. Google Scholar

15.

P. Dollé, J-C. Izpisúa-Belmonte, H. Falkenstein, A. Renucci, and D. Duboule . 1989. Coordinate expression of the murine Hox-5 complex homeobox-containing genes during limb pattern formation. Nature 342:767–772. Google Scholar

16.

P. Dollé, A. Dierich, M. LeMeur, T. Schimmang, B. Schuhbaur, P. Chambon, and D. Duboule . 1993. Disruption of the Hoxd-13 gene induces lacalized heterochrony leading to mice with neotenic limbs. Cell 75:431–441. Google Scholar

17.

D. Duboule 1994. Temporal colinearity and the phylotypic progression: a basis for the stability of a vertebrate Bauplan and the evolution of morphologies through heterochrony. Development Suppl135–142. Google Scholar

18.

T. Ducibella 1974. The occurence of biochemical metamorphic events without anatomical metamorphosis in the axolotl. Devel Biol 38:187–194. Google Scholar

19.

J. D. Engel 1993. Developmental regulation of human β-globin gene transcription: A switch of loyalties? Trends Genet 9:304–309. Google Scholar

20.

H. Fox 1985. Changes in amphibian skin during larval development and metamorphosis. In Metamorphosis. Ed by M. Balls and M. Bownes . Clarendon Press. Oxford. pp. 59–87. Google Scholar

21.

E. Frieden 1981. The dual role of thyroid hormones in vertebrate development and calorigenesis. In Metamorphosis: A Problem in Developmental Biology. Ed by L. I. Gilbert and E. Frieden . Plenum Press. New York. pp. 545–564. Google Scholar

22.

S. F. Gilbert 1994. Developmental Biology. 4th ed. Sinauer Assoc Inc Publ. Sunderland. Google Scholar

23.

S. F. Gilbert, J. M. Opitz, and R. A. Raff . 1996. Resynthesizing evolutionary and developmental biology. Devel Biol 173:357–372. Google Scholar

24.

S. J. Gould 1977. Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Harvard University Press. Cambridge. Google Scholar

25.

K. I. Hanaoka 1954. Precocious germ cell defferentiation in amphibia, produced by the treatment with thiourea. Cytologia 19:182–190. Google Scholar

26.

J. E. Heady and J. J. Kollros . 1964. Hormonal modification of the development of plical skin glands. Gen Comp Endocrinol 4:124–131. Google Scholar

27.

P. W. H. Holland and J. Garcia-Fernàndez . 1996. Hox genes and chordate evolution. Devel Biol 173:382–395. Google Scholar

28.

H. A. Hosbach, H. J. Widmer, A-C. Andreas, and R. Weber . 1982. Expression and organization of the globin genes in Xenopus laevis. In Embryonic Development, Part A: Genetic Aspects. Ed by M. M. Burger and R. Weber . Alan R Liss. New York. pp. 115–125. Google Scholar

29.

J. Hourdry 1993a. Passage to the terrestrial life in amphibians: Events accompanying this ecological transition. Zool Sci 10:715–731. Google Scholar

30.

J. Hourdry 1993b. Passage to the terrestrial life in amphibians II. Endocrine determinism. Zool Sci 10:887–902. Google Scholar

31.

M. Isobe, S. Suwan, H. Kai, N. Katagiri, and M. Ikeda . 1995. Amino acid sequence of PIN peptides conducting TIME (Time-Interval-Measuring-Esterase) activation fro resumption of embryonic development in the silkworm, Bombyx mori. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 5:2851–2854. Google Scholar

32.

J-C. Izpisúa-Belmonte, H. Falkenstein, P. Dollé, A. Renucci, and D. Duboule . 1991. Murine genes related to the Drosophila AbdB homeotic gene are sequentially expressed during development of the posterior part of the body. EMBO J 10:2279–2289. Google Scholar

33.

Y. Izutsu, M. Kaiho, and K. Yoshizato . 1993. Different distribution of epidermal basal cells in the anuran larval skin correlates with the skin's region-specific fate at metamorphosis. J Exp Zool 267:605–615. Google Scholar

34.

A. Jurand 1955. Neoteny in Xenopus laevis Daud. Folia Biol 3:315–330. Google Scholar

35.

R. D. Jurd 1985. Haematological and immunological ‘metamorphosis’ in neotenous urodeles. In Metamorphosis. Ed by M. Balls and M. Bownes . Clarendon Press. Oxford. pp. 313–331. Google Scholar

36.

H. Kai, Y. Kotani, Y. Miao, and M. Azuma . 1995. Time interval measuring enzyme for resumption of embryonic development in the silkwom, Bombyx mori. J Insect Physiol 41:905–910. Google Scholar

37.

H. Kai, Y. Kotani, K. Oda, T. Arai, and T. Miwa . 1996. Presence of PIN factor(s) responsible for the time-interval activation of esterase A4 in the diapausing duration timer of Bombyx mori. J Seric Sci Jpn 65:31–38. Google Scholar

38.

D. E. Kelly 1966. The Leydig cell in larval amphibian epidermis. Fine structure and function. Anat Rec 154:685–700. Google Scholar

39.

R. J. Konopka 1987. Genetics of biological rhythms in Drosophila. Ann Rev Genet 21:227–236. Google Scholar

40.

Y. Kobayakawa and H. Y. Kubota . 1981. Temporal pattern of cleavage and onset of gastrulation in amphibian embryos developed from eggs with the reduced cytopolasm. J Embryol Exp Morph 62:83–94. Google Scholar

41.

M. Kotani 1957. On the formation of primordial germ cells from the presumptive ectoderm of Triturus gastrulae. J Inst Polytech Osaka City Univ Ser D 8:145–159. Google Scholar

42.

M. Kotani 1958. The formation of germ cells after extirpation of the presumptive lateral plate mesoderm of Triturus gastrulae. J Inst Polytech Osaka City Univ Ser D 9:195–209. Google Scholar

43.

R. Lehmann and A. Ephrussi . 1994. Germ plasm formation and germ cell determination in Drosophila. In. Germline Development. Ciba Foundation Symposium 182. John Wiley & Sons. Chichester. pp. 282–300. Google Scholar

44.

A. S. I. Loudon, N. L. Wayne, R. Krieg, A. Iranmanesh, J. D. Veldhuis, and M. Menaker . 1994. Ultradian endocrine rhythm are altered by a circadian mutation in the Syrian hamster. Endocrinology 135:712–718. Google Scholar

45.

W. G. Lynn 1961. Types of amphibian metamorphosis. Am Zool 1:151–161. Google Scholar

46.

W. G. Lynn and A. W. Peadon . 1955. The role of thyroid gland in direct development of the anuran Eleutherodactylus martinicenis. Growth 19:263–286. Google Scholar

47.

N. MacLean and R. D. Jurd . 1971. Electrophoretic analysis of the heamoglobins of Ambystoma mexicanum. Comp Biochem Physiol 40B:751–755. Google Scholar

48.

N. MacLean and R. D. Jurd . 1972. The control of haemoglobin synthesis. Biol Rev 47:393–437. Google Scholar

49.

S. Makino 1934. A cytological study on the maturation and fertilization of the egg of Hynobius retardatus (an urodelan amphibian). J Fac Sci Hokkaido Imp Univ Ser IV Zool 3:117–167. Google Scholar

50.

G. M. Malacinski and A. J. Brothers . 1974. Mutant genes in the Mexican axolotl. Science 184:1142–1147. Google Scholar

51.

G. M. Malacinski 1978. The Mexican axolotl, Ambystoma mexicanum: its biology and developmental genetics, and its autonomous cell lethal genes. Am Zool 18:195–206. Google Scholar

52.

C. R. McClung, B. A. Fox, and J. C. Dunlap . 1989. The Neurospora clock gene frequency shares a sequence element with the Drosophila clock gene period. Nature 339:558–562. Google Scholar

53.

P. Michael 1984. Are the primordial germ ceils (PGCs) in Urodela formed by the inductive action of the vegetative yolk mass? Devel Biol 103:109–116. Google Scholar

54.

A. Montagu 1981. Growing Young. McGraw-Hill. New York. Google Scholar

55.

T. Moriya 1983a. Cytological changes induced by low temperature in the thyroid gland of larvae of the salamander Hynobius retardatus. Gen Comp Endocrinol 49:8–14. Google Scholar

56.

T. Moriya 1983b. The effects of temperature on the action of thyroid hormone and prolactin in larvae of the salamander Hynobius retardatus. Gen Comp Endocrinol 49:1–7. Google Scholar

57.

I. C. Neish 1971. Comparison of size, structure and distributional patterns of two salamander populations in Marion Lake, British Columbia. J Fish Res Bd Canada 28:49–58. Google Scholar

58.

J. Newport and M. Kirschner . 1982. A major developmental transition in early Xenopus embryos: I. Characterization and timing of cellular changes at the midblastula stage. Cell 30:675–686. Google Scholar

59.

P. D. Nieuwkoop and L. A. Sutasurya . 1979. Primordial Germ Cells in the Chordates. Cambridge Univ Press. Cambridge. Google Scholar

60.

D. O. Norris 1980. Endocrine regulation of amphibian metamorphosis. In. Vertebrate Endocrinology. Lea & Febiger. Philadelphia. pp. 441–459. Google Scholar

61.

R. A. Nussbaum 1976. Changes in serum proteins associated with metamorphosis in salamanders of the family Ambystomidae. Comp Biochem Physiol 53B:569–573. Google Scholar

62.

K. V. Prahlad and L. E. DeLanney . 1965. A study of induced metamorphosis in the axolotl. J Exp Zool 160:137–146. Google Scholar

63.

R. A. Raff 1992. Direct-developing sea urchins and the evolutionary reorganization of early development. BioEssays 14:211–218. Google Scholar

64.

R. A. Raff and G. A. Wray . 1989. Heterochrony: developmental mechanisms and evolutionary results. J Evol Biol 2:409–434. Google Scholar

65.

M. R. Ralph and M. Menaker . 1988. A mutation of the circadian system in golden hamsters. Science 241:1225–1227. Google Scholar

66.

M. K. Richardson 1995. Heterochrony and the phylotypic period. Devel Biol 172:412–421. Google Scholar

67.

F. M. Rijli, M. Mark, S. Lakkaraju, A. Dierich, P. Dollé, and P. Chambon . 1993. A homeotic transformation is generated in the rostral branchial region of the head by disruption of Hoxa-2, which acts as a selector gene. Cell 75:1333–1349. Google Scholar

68.

D. H. Robinson and M. B. Heintzelman . 1987. Morphology of ventral epidermis of Rana catesbeiana during metamorphosis. Anat Rec 217:305–317. Google Scholar

69.

P. Rosenkilde 1985. The role of hormones in the regulation of amphibian metamorphosis. In Metamorphosis. Ed by M. Balls and M. Bownes . Clarendon Press. Oxford. pp. 211–259. Google Scholar

70.

G. Ruvkun and J. Giusto . 1989. The Caenorhabditis elegans heterochronic gene lin-14 encodes a nuclear protein that forms a temporal developmental switch. Nature 338:313–319. Google Scholar

71.

M. Sasaki 1924. On a Japanese salamander, in Lake Kuttarush, which propagates like the axolotl. J Coll Agr Hokkaido Imp Univ 15:1–36. Google Scholar

72.

M. Sasaki and H. Nakamura . 1937. Relation of endocrine system to neoteny and skin pigmentation in a salamander, Hynobius retardatus Boulenger. Annot Zool Japon 16:81–97. Google Scholar

73.

N. Satoh 1982. Timing mechanisms in early embryonic development. Differentiation 22:156–163. Google Scholar

74.

N. Satoh 1985. Recent advances in our understanding of the temporal control of early embryonic development in amphibians. J Embryol Exp Morph 89:257–270. Google Scholar

75.

N. Satoh 1990. Timing mechanisms in early development. In Cytoplasmic Organization Systems. Ed by G. M. Malacinski McGraw-Hill. New York. pp. 105–122. Google Scholar

76.

N. Satoh 1995. Towards a molecular understanding of developmental mechanisms underlying the origin and evolution of chordates. In Biodiversity and Evolution. Ed by R. Arai, M. Kaito, and Y. Doi . Natl Sci Mus Found. Tokyo. pp. 267–290. Google Scholar

77.

N. Satoh and W. R. Jeffery . 1995. Chasing tails in ascidians: developmental insights into the origin and evolution of chordates. Trends Genet 11:354–359. Google Scholar

78.

H. M. Smith 1989. Discovery of the axolotl and its early history in biological research. In Developmental Biology of the Axolotl. Ed by J. B. Armstrong and G. M. Malacinski . Oxford Univ Press. Oxford. pp. 3–12. Google Scholar

79.

L. D. Smith 1966. The role of a ‘germinal plasm’ in the formation of primordial germ cells in Rana pipiens. Devel Biol 14:330–347. Google Scholar

80.

H. Spemann 1936. Exerimentelle Beiträge Zu Einertheorie Der Entwicklung. Springer-Verlag. Berlin. Google Scholar

81.

W. G. Sprules 1974a. The adaptive significance of paedogenesis in North American species of Ambystoma (Amphibia: Caudata): an hypothesis. Can J Zool 52:393–400. Google Scholar

82.

W. G. Sprules 1974b. Environmental factors and the incidence of neoteny in Ambystoma gracile (Baird) (Amphibia: Caudata). Can J Zool 52:1545–1552. Google Scholar

83.

L. A. Sutasurya and P. D. Nieuwkoop . 1974. The induction of the primordial gem cells in the urodeles. Wilhelm Roux' Arch Entwicklungsmech 175:199–220. Google Scholar

84.

J. S. Takahashi, L. H. Pinto, and M. H. Vitaterna . 1994. Forward and reverse genetic approaches to behavior in the mouse. Science 264:1724–1733. Google Scholar

85.

A. Taurog 1974. Effect of TSH and long-acting thyroid stimulator on thyroid 131I-metabolism and metamorphosis of the Mexican axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum). Gen Comp Endocrinol 24:257–266. Google Scholar

86.

S. G. Tilley 1973. Life histories and natural selection in populations of the salamander Desmognathus ochrophaeus. Ecology 54:3–17. Google Scholar

87.

R. Tompkins 1978. Genetic control of axolotl metamorphosis. Am Zool 18:313–319. Google Scholar

88.

R. Tompkins and J. K. Townsend . 1977. Control of metamorphic events in a neotenic urodele Ambystoma mexicanum. J Exp Zool 200:191–196. Google Scholar

89.

J. W. Valentine, D. H. Erwin, and D. Jablonski . 1996. Developmental evolution of metazoan bodyplans: the fossil evidence. Devel Biol 173:373–381. Google Scholar

90.

M. H. Vitaterna, D. P. King, A-M. Chang, J. M. Kornhouser, P. L. Lowrey, J. D. McDonald, W. F. Dove, L. H. Pinto, F. W. Turek, and J. S. Takahashi . 1994. Mutagenesis and mapping of a mouse gene, Clock, essential for circadian behavior. Science 264:719–725. Google Scholar

91.

M. Wakahara 1977. Partial characterization of ‘primordial germ cell-forming activity’ localized in vegetal cytoplasm in anuran egg. J Embryol Exp Morph 39:221–233. Google Scholar

92.

M. Wakahara 1978. Induction of supernumerary primordial germ cells by injecting vegetal pole cytoplasm into Xenopus eggs. J Exp Zool 203:159–164. Google Scholar

93.

M. Wakahara 1990a. Germ plasm: its role in species continuity on the earth and in space. In Foundation of Space Biology. Ed by M. Asashima and G. M. Malacinski . Japan Sci Soc Press. Tokyo. pp. 139–151. Google Scholar

94.

M. Wakahara 1990b. Cytoplasmic localization and organization of germ-cell determinants. In Cytoplasmic Organization System. Ed by G. M. Malacinski McGraw-Hill. New York. pp. 219–242. Google Scholar

95.

M. Wakahara 1994. Spermatogenesis is extraordinarily accerelated in metamorphosis-arrested larvae of a salamander, Hynobius retardatus. Experientia 50:94–98. Google Scholar

96.

M. Wakahara 1996. Primordial germ cell development: Is the urodele pattern closer to mammals than to anurans? Int J Dev Biol 40:653–659. Google Scholar

97.

M. Wakahara, N. Miyashita, A. Sakamoto, and T. Arai . 1994. Several biochemical alterations from larval to adult types are independent on morphological metamorphosis in a salamander, Hynobius retardatus. Zool Sci 11:583–588. Google Scholar

98.

M. Wakahara and M. Yamaguchi . 1996. Heterochronic expression of several adult phenotypes in normally metamorphosing and metamorphosis-arrested larvae of a salamander Hynobius retardatus. Zool Sci 13:483–488. Google Scholar

99.

R. Weber 1967. Biochemistry of amphibian metamorphosis. In The Biochemistry of Animal Development. Vol 2:Ed by R. Weber Academic Press. New York. pp. 227–310. Google Scholar

100.

H. J. Widmer, A-C. Andres, J. Niessing, H. A. Hosbach, and R. Weber . 1981. Comparative analysis of cloned larval and adult globin cDNA sequences of Xenopus laevis. Devel Biol 88:325–332. Google Scholar

101.

H. M. Wilber 1971. The ecological relationship of the salamander Ambystoma laterale to its all-female, gynogenetic associate. Evolution 25:168–179. Google Scholar

102.

M. Yamaguchi, S. Tanaka, and M. Wakahara . 1996. Immunohisto- and immunocytochemical studies on the dynamics of TSH and GTH cells in normally metamorphosing, metamorphosed and metamorphosis-arrested Hynobius retardatus. Gen Comp Endocrinol in press. Google Scholar

103.

Y. Yaoita and D. D. Brown . 1990. A correlation of thyroid hormone receptor gene expression with amphibian metamorphosis. Genes Dev 4:1917–1924. Google Scholar

104.

K. Yoshizato 1989. Biochemistry and cell biology of amphibian metamorphosis with special emphasis on the mechanism of removal of larval organs. Int Rev Cytol 119:97–149. Google Scholar

105.

K. Yoshizato 1992. Death and transformation of larval cells during metamorphosis of anura. Devel Growth Differ 34:607–612. Google Scholar
Masami Wakahara "Heterochrony and Neotenic Salamanders: Possible Clues for Understanding the Animal Development and Evolution," Zoological Science 13(6), 765-776, (1 December 1996). https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.13.765
Received: 1 July 1996; Accepted: 1 July 1996; Published: 1 December 1996
JOURNAL ARTICLE
12 PAGES


Share
SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top