Translator Disclaimer
1 January 2003 Expression Pattern and Transcriptional Control of SoxB1 in Embryos of the Ascidian Halocynthia roretzi
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The Sox family is a large group of transcription factors that are characterized by the presence of a DNA-binding HMG domain. We isolated HrSoxB1, an ascidian homolog of the Sox gene that belongs to the B1 subclass of the Sox family, from Halocynthia roretzi. Expression was initiated as early as the 8-cell stage. During cleavage stages, HrSoxB1 was expressed in three quarters of embryonic blastomeres but not in posterior-vegetal (B-line) blastomeres. Misexpression of mRNAs of HrPEM but not of macho-1, whose maternal mRNAs are localized to the posterior-vegetal cytoplasm of eggs and early embryos, repressed the anterior-vegetal expression of HrSoxB1. This result suggests that the zygotic expression of HrSoxB1 is controlled by the localized maternal mRNA. When HrSoxB1 was overexpressed in early embryos, ectopic expression of HrBra, a gene for a transcription factor expressed in notochord blastomeres, occurred in the most posterior blastomeres (B7.5), although these blastomeres did not eventually differentiate into notochord but developed into muscle, as they do in normal embryogenesis. In later embryogenesis, HrSoxB1 was specifically expressed in neural plate cells. However, overexpression of HrSoxB1 did not affect the expression of a neural plate marker gene, HrETR-1.

INTRODUCTION

The embryogenesis of ascidians represents basic characteristics of chordate development, but in a very simplified manner (Satoh, 1994; Nishida, 1997, 2002; Corbo et al., 2001). The fate specification of embryonic cells of ascidians greatly depends on localized maternal factors in egg cytoplasm. We are trying to identify genes whose zygotic expression is initiated at early cleavage stages, and investigating how their blastomere-specific expression is controlled by maternally localized ooplasmic factors. During our screening for such genes, we have found a clone showing sequence similarity to the Sox family of transcription factors (Miya and Nishida, 2002). As its expression pattern during cleavage is conspicuous, we isolated full-length cDNA to characterize the gene and to analyze maternal control of the zygotic transcription and its function during ascidian early development.

The Sox family is a large group of transcription factors that are characterized by the presence of a DNA-binding HMG (high mobility group) domain that is 70–80 amino acids long and are structurally related to the mammalian sex-determination factor Sry (Gubbay et al., 1990). Sox proteins bind to specific DNA sequences. The consensus binding motif for Sox proteins has been defined as the heptameric sequence 5′-(A/T)(A/T)CAAAG-3′. It has been proposed that Sox proteins function as architectural proteins by bending DNA and organizing local chromatin structure. Members of the family are found throughout the animal kingdom, and perform their function in a diverse range of developmental processes such as germ layer formation, organ development, and cell type specification (reviewed by Wegner, 1999). They are subdivided into eleven subgroups according to sequence similarity of the HMG domain, full-length protein structure, and gene organization (Bowles et al., 2000). Among those subgroups, subgroup B1 includes Sox1, 2, and 3, which are known to be involved in vertebrate neural development (reviewed by Sasai, 2001).

We report the detailed expression pattern of the Halo-cynthia HrSoxB1 gene, evidence for the maternal control of its transcription, and results of overexpression of HrSoxB1 mRNA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals and embryos

Halocynthia roretzi was purchased from fishermen near the Otsuchi Marine Research Center, Ocean Research Institute, University of Tokyo, Iwate, Japan, and near the Asamushi Marine Biological Station, Tohoku University, Aomori, Japan. Naturally spawned eggs were fertilized with a suspension of non-self sperm. When fertilized eggs were cultured at about 12°C, they developed into gastrulae and early tailbud embryos at 12 and 24 hr, respectively after fertilization. Tadpole larvae hatched after 40 hr of development. In some experiments, cleavages of embryos were permanently arrested by treatment with 2 μg/ml Cytochalasin B at the 110-cell stage.

Cloning and sequence comparison of HrSoxB1

A cDNA library of 110-cell stage embryos was constructed by use of a uniZAP vector in a ZAP-cDNA synthesis kit (Stratagene, USA). A full-length cDNA for HrSoxB1 was obtained by screening the library using an original partial cDNA as a probe (Miya and Nishida, 2002). The cDNA was cloned into the plasmid vector pBluescript (Stratagene), and was used for further analysis. Nucleotide sequences were determined for both strands with a SequiTherm Excel II kit (Epicentre Technologies, Madison, WI, USA) and an LIC-4000 DNA sequencer (Li-Cor Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA). Amino acid sequences of the Sox family gene products from various animals were aligned, and gaps were introduced to obtain alignment with maximal similarity. Molecular phylogenetic relationships of the Sox family gene products were estimated by means of neighbor-joining (Saitou and Nei, 1987) using the PHYLIP ver. 3.5c package (Felsenstein, 1993). A distance matrix was constructed according to the Dayhoff model (Dayhoff et al., 1978). Seventy-nine confidently aligned sites of the HMG box were analyzed.

Whole-mount in situ hybridization

Whole-mount in situ hybridization was performed as described by Miya et al. (1997). After hybridization, the specimens were washed in 50% formamide, 2×SSC, 1% SDS (15 min, 50°C). The specimens were digested with 10 μg/mL RNase A in 2×SSC, 0.1% Tween 20 (20 min, 37°C), then washed in 2×SSC, 0.1% Tween 20 (2×20 min, 50°C), and 0.2×SSC, 0.1% Tween 20 (2×20 min, 37°C). Finally, the specimens were washed twice in PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20 at room temperature and visualized by the alkaline phosphatase reaction.

Injection of synthetic mRNA

The entire open reading frame of HrPEM, macho-1 (Nishida and Sawada 2001), HrSoxB1 or lacZ as a control was cloned into the pBluescriptHTB transcription vector, which contains both 5′ and 3′ UTR regions of HrTBB2, a Halocynthia beta-tubulin gene (Akanuma and Nishida, unpublished data). The recombinant plasmid was linearized with XhoI and transcribed with T3 polymerase in the presence of m7G(5′)ppp(5′)G by using an mMessage mMachine kit (Ambion, USA). Synthetic mRNAs of HrPEM, macho-1, and HrSoxB1 were injected into fertilized eggs. Eggs injected with mRNA were allowed to develop to appropriate stages, then embryos were fixed for in situ hybridization or for immunohistochemistry with Mu-2 and Not-1 monoclonal antibodies as described in Nishikata et al. (1987) and Nishikata and Satoh (1990). A portion of the embryos were allowed to develop into larvae to examine the larval phenotypes.

RESULTS

Cloning and Structure of HrSoxB1

During our screening for genes whose expression are initiated during the early cleavage stage of the ascidian Halocynthia roretzi, we isolated a clone showing sequence similarity to the Sox family of transcription factors (Miya and Nishida, 2002). Since the clone appeared to lack an amino terminus, we screened the cDNA library of the 110-cell stage by using the partial clone as a probe. The longest clone we obtained was 2160 bp long, and had 18 adenyl residues at the 3′ end and a putative open reading frame of 360 amino acids (DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank accession number:  AB087830). A BLAST search showed that it is most similar to the B1 subclass of Sox family transcription factors, and we named it HrSoxB1. Fig. 1 shows the alignment of the predicted amino acid sequences of HrSoxB1 and other B1 subclass Sox gene products.

Fig. 1

Comparison of amino acid sequences of HrSoxB1 with those of mouse Sox1 (shown as mSox1; GenBank accession no.  CAA63846), Sox2 (mSox2;  AAC31791), Sox3 (mSox3;  CAA63845), Xenopus Sox2 (xeSox2;  AAC14215), Sox3 (xeSox3;  CAA68828), and sea urchin SpSoxB1 (suSoxB1;  AAD40688). Amino acids identical to HrSoxB1 are highlighted. Conserved amino acids are indicated by asterisks. HMG box is indicated.

i0289-0003-20-1-59-f01.gif

To verify that HrSoxB1 belongs to the B1 subclass of the Sox family, we constructed a molecular phylogenetic tree using the sequences of the well conserved HMG box. The tree shown in Fig. 2 was constructed by the neighbor-joining method (Saitou and Nei, 1987), and mouse Lef1 and Tcf1 were used as the outgroup for rooting. The tree supported the view that HrSoxB1 is a member of the B1 subclass, although we could not tell the relationship within the subclass from the tree.

Fig. 2

Molecular phylogenetic relationship among the Sox family estimated by the neighbor-joining method. The name of each gene and group follows Bowles et al. (2000). In addition to those listed in Fig. 1, we included for analysis mouse Sox4 (shown as mSOX4; GenBank accession no.  CAA49779), Sox5 (mSOX5;  CAA09269), Sox6 (mSOX6;  BAA09618), Sox7 (mSOX7;  BAA78765), Sox8 (mSOX8;  AAF35837), Sox10 (mSOX10;  AAC24564), Sox14 (mSOX14;  AAF62397), Sry (mSRY;  AAC53433), human Sox9 (hSOX9;  CAA86598), Sry (hSRY;  CAA65281), Xenopus Sox17α (xSOX17α;  CAA04957), Sox31 (xSOX31;  BAA32249), sea urchin SoxB1 (suSOXB1;  AF157389), SoxB2 (suSOXB2;  AAD40687), Drosophila SoxB1 (dSOXB1;  CAB64386), and SoxB2.1 (dSOXB2.1;  CAA65279). Mouse Lef1 (mLEF1;  P27782) and Tcf1 (mTCF1;  Q00417) were used for the outgroup rooting. The results suggested that HrSoxB1 is a member of group B1.

i0289-0003-20-1-59-f02.gif

Expression pattern of HrSoxB1

Zygotic expression of HrSoxB1 was first detected as early as the 8-cell stage (Fig. 3A) by whole-mount in situ hybridization. Signals were apparent in a4.2 and A4.1 blastomeres, which lie in the anterior half of embryos. Sometimes a weak signal was also observed in b4.2 blastomeres, which are posterior-animal blastomeres. At the 16-cell stage, expression was detected in all eight blastomeres of the animal hemisphere, which are derived from a4.2 and b4.2 blastomeres of the 8-cell embryo, as well as in the four anterior-vegetal blastomeres derived from A4.1 blastomeres (Figs. 3B, C). In contrast, no signal was detected in the four posterior-vegetal blastomeres derived from B4.1 blastomeres. At the 32- to 110-cell stages, HrSoxB1 expression was maintained in the entire animal hemisphere and in the anterior-vegetal blastomeres, but no signal was detected in the posterior-vegetal blastomeres (Figs. 3D–I). Therefore, the posterior-vegetal blastomeres that were derived from B4.1 blastomeres never expressed HrSoxB1 during cleavage stage, but all other blastomeres did. In later stages, HrSoxB1 was expressed in the neural plate (Figs. 3J, K), and after neural tube formation in the nerve cord (posterior neural tube) and anterior neural tissues (Fig. 3L).

Fig. 3

Spatial expression of HrSoxB1. (A–L) Embryos hybridized in situ with HrSoxB1 antisense probe. (A′, C′, E′, G′, I′) Diagrams corresponding to lateral view (A) and the vegetal views (C, E, G, I) of embryos. The anterior-vegetal blastomeres derived from A4.1 blastomeres of the 8-cell embryo in which mRNA was detected are colored light blue. The posterior-vegetal blastomeres derived from B4.1 blastomeres of the 8-cell embryo in which mRNA is absent are shown in red. Black dots represent signals detected in blastomere nuclei. Anterior is to the left in panel A and up in B–L. Arrow in (L) indicates nerve cord expression; arrowhead indicates expression in the anterior neural tissue. Scale bar, 100 μm. 32c, 32-cell stage; 64c, 64-cell stage; 110c, 110-cell stage; Np, neural plate stage; Neu, neurula stage; eTb, early tailbud stage; lat, lateral view; ani, animal view; veg, vegetal view; dor, dorsal view.

i0289-0003-20-1-59-f03.jpg

Expression of HrSoxB1 is suppressed by overexpression of HrPEM but not by macho-1

From the peculiar but simple expression pattern, one may assume that transcription of HrSoxB1 is repressed in the B4.1 blastomere and its descendants by maternal mRNAs localized to the posterior-vegetal egg cytoplasm. Of several mRNAs reported to be localized to the posterior cytoplasm of fertilized eggs and partitioned into the B4.1 blastomeres, we tested HrPEM and macho-1 that were cloned by Nishida and Sawada (2001). We injected synthetic mRNA of HrPEM and macho-1 into fertilized eggs and examined the expression of HrSoxB1 and two other marker genes, HrBra and HrMA4. HrBra is an ascidian homolog of the brachyury gene and is expressed in notochord precursor cells, many of which lie in the anterior-vegetal hemisphere (Yasuo and Satoh, 1994). HrMA4 encodes muscle actin and is expressed in muscle precursor cells in the posterior-vegetal hemisphere (Satou et al., 1995).

The injection of 10 pg of HrPEM mRNA into fertilized eggs suppressed HrSoxB1 expression in the anterior-vegetal blastomeres but not in the animal hemisphere of the 32-cell embryos (Figs. 4A, B). The repression of HrSoxB1 in the vegetal hemisphere was confirmed in all cases examined (n=12). This amount of HrPEM RNA suppressed HrBra expression in the notochord precursors (12 out of 13 cases; Fig. 4E), but did not affect muscle actin expression (all 14 cases; Fig. 4F) at the 110-cell stage.

Fig. 4

Effects of HrPEM and macho-1 overexpression on early expression pattern of HrSoxB1, HrBra, and HrMA4. Fertilized eggs were injected with 10 pg of HrPEM mRNA (A, B, E, F) or 20 pg of macho-1 mRNA (C, D, G, H). (A–D) Expression of HrSoxB1 in the 32-cell embryo detected by in situ hybridization. Expression of HrSoxB1 in the vegetal hemispheres was suppressed in HrPEM-injected embryo. (E, G) Expression of HrBra, an ascidian ortholog of brachyury, in the 110-cell embryo. (F, H) Expression of HrMA4, an embryonic muscle actin gene, in the 110-cell embryo. ani, animal view; veg, vegetal view; 32c, 32-cell stage; 110c, 110-cell stage.

i0289-0003-20-1-59-f04.gif

The injection of 20 pg of macho-1 mRNA into fertilized eggs was sufficient to promote ectopic muscle formation as reported in Nishida and Sawada (2001). This amount of macho-1 mRNA induced ectopic expression of HrMA4 in the posterior-vegetal region (11 out of 12 cases), and in some embryos (3 out of 12 cases) ectopic expression was also observed in anterior nerve cord precursors (Fig. 4H). However, in all 13 cases we examined, this amount of macho-1 did not affect the expression of HrBra in the notochord precursors (Fig. 4G). In embryos injected with macho-1, HrSoxB1 expression was not altered (Figs. 4C, D). Normal expression of HrSoxB1 was confirmed in all 15 embryos. Thus, the repression of HrSoxB1 expression was specific to HrPEM mRNA.

Overexpression of HrSoxB1 promoted ectopic expression of HrBra but not ectopic notochord formation

To investigate the function of HrSoxB1, we injected synthetic HrSoxB1 mRNA into eggs. When 50 pg of HrSoxB1 mRNA was injected, the result was short-tailed larvae (Fig. 5B). In 60% (40 out of 67) of the larvae, notochord cells failed to correctly intercalate with each other, and tail elongation was interfered. The rest showed milder abnormalities. In control larvae injected with lacZ mRNA, development was normal (Fig. 5A).

Fig. 5

Effects of HrSoxB1 overexpression in ascidian embryos. Fertilized eggs were injected with 50 pg of either lacZ mRNA (A, C, D, G, H, K) as a control or HrSoxB1 mRNA (B, E, F, I, J, L). (A, B) Morphology of larvae. Notochord cells (arrowheads) failed to align and the tail did not elongate. (C, E) Expression of HrMA4 in the 110-cell embryo. (D, F) Expression of HrBra in the 110-cell embryo. In HrSoxB1-injected embryo, ectopic expression of HrBra (black arrowheads) was observed. (G–J) After injection, embryos were cleavage-arrested at the 110-cell stage and raised until control embryos reached the tailbud stage. (G, I) Embryos were immunostained with Mu-2 monoclonal antibody, which recognizes myosin heavy chain in muscle cells. (H, J) Embryos were immunostained with Not-1 monoclonal antibody, which stains differentiated notochord cells. In HrSoxB1-injected embryos and control embryos, B7.5 blastomeres (white arrowheads) differentiated into muscle but not into notochord. (K, L) Expression of neural-plate marker gene, HrETR-1, at neural-plate stage. No significant difference was observed between HrSoxB1-injected embryo (L) and control lacZ-injected embryo (K). veg, vegetal view; dor, dorsal view; 110c, 110-cell stage; CytoB, cleavage arrest with Cytochalasin B.

i0289-0003-20-1-59-f05.jpg

We examined marker gene expression in HrSoxB1-injected embryos. We first examined the expression of a muscle actin gene, HrMA4, at the 110-cell stage. In all 19 cases, expression was normal (Figs. 5C, E). In contrast, 77% (17 of 22) showed ectopic expression of HrBra in B7.5 blastomeres, which lie posteriorly in the vegetal hemisphere (Fig. 5F, arrowhead). B7.5 blastomeres give rise to larval muscle cells and trunk ventral cells (TVCs), which produce adult body-wall muscle and heart after metamorphosis (Hirano and Nishida, 1997). The B7.5 blastomeres never expressed the brachyury gene in normal or control embryos (Fig. 5D). Therefore, in B7.5 blastomeres of HrSoxB1-injected embryos, brachyury and HrMA4 were expressed together. This never happens in normal development.

With these puzzling results in HrSoxB1-injected embryos, we further investigated which tissue the B7.5 blastomeres developed into in later embryogenesis. We carried out experiments with cleavage-arrested embryos. Embryos were treated with 2 μg/ml Cytochalasin B at the 110-cell stage to inhibit further cell divisions, and cultured until the control embryos reached tailbud-stage. Even when cleavages of ascidian embryos were permanently arrested at 110-cell stage, cleavage-arrested blastomeres continues some differentiation processes and eventually express muscle and notochord differentiation features (Whittaker, 1973; Nishikata et al., 1987; Nishikata and Satoh, 1990). When we stained the embryos with the muscle-specific Mu-2 antibody, an antibody for myosin heavy chain, cleavage-arrested muscle blastomeres, including the B7.5 blastomeres, expressed muscle myosin. In embryos injected with HrSoxB1 mRNA, the pattern of myosin expression was not altered in all cases (n=15) (Figs. 5G, I). The Not-1 antibody stain differentiated notochord cells. In control, this antibody stained cleavage-arrested notochord blastomeres that expressed the brachyury gene at the 110-cell stage (Fig. 5H). In all embryos injected with HrSoxB1 mRNA (n=15), the pattern of antibody staining was normal and signals were never detected in B7.5 blastomeres (Fig. 5J, arrowhead). These results clearly indicate that in HrSoxB1-injected embryos, B7.5 blastomeres differentiate into muscle cells, although they expressed ectopic HrBra at the 110-cell stage. When we increased the amount of injected mRNA, so that it might overcome the muscle differentiation, the cleavage pattern of embryos was disturbed and we could not analyze the results.

The vertebrate Sox2 gene, as well as Sox1 and Sox3, is known to be involved in neural development (for review, Sasai, 2000), and HrSoxB1 is expressed in the neural plate and neural tube in the ascidian (Figs. 3J–L). Therefore, we examined the expression of a neural marker gene, HrETR-1, in HrSoxB1-overexpressed embryos at the neural-plate stage. However, in all 14 cases, the expression pattern of HrETR-1 was normal (Figs. 5K, L).

DISCUSSION

We isolated HrSoxB1, an ascidian homolog of the Sox gene, which belongs to the B1 subclass of the Sox family. During cleavage, HrSoxB1 was expressed in many blastomeres, but not in the posterior-vegetal B-line blastomeres. Overexpression of HrPEM but not macho-1 repressed the anterior-vegetal expression of HrSoxB1. When HrSoxB1 was overexpressed in early embryos, ectopic expression of HrBra in the most posterior blastomeres (B7.5) was observed. However, those blastomeres did not eventually differentiate into notochord but developed into muscle cells, as they do in normal embryogenesis.

HrSoxB1 is an ascidian homolog of B1 subclass Sox genes

The Sox family is a large group of transcription factors that have a DNA-binding HMG domain. On the basis of the sequence of the HMG domain, full-length protein structure, and gene organization, the Sox family is subdivided into eleven subgroups (Bowles et al., 2000). Subgroup B1 includes vertebrate Sox1, 2, and 3. Sequence similarity suggested that the ascidian HrSoxB1 is a B1 member. This conclusion is supported by the molecular phylogenetic analysis of the HMG domain shown in Fig. 2.

Regulation of HrSoxB1 expression

The zygotic expression of HrSoxB1 begins as early as the 8-cell stage. Some ascidian genes whose zygotic expression starts at the 8-cell stage have been reported (Shimauchi et al., 1997; Chiba et al., 1998; Nishikata et al., 2001; Miya and Nishida, 2002). However, no gene is so far known to be zygotically expressed at the 4-cell stage. Therefore, HrSoxB1 is one of the earliest genes to be zygotically expressed in ascidian embryos. This early initiation suggests that the expression of HrSoxB1 is regulated by maternal factors. Accordingly, the expression pattern of HrSoxB1 was simple: it began and continued in three-quarters of each embryo except for the posterior-vegetal B-line blastomeres. There are two possibilities for the absence of expression from the B-line blastomeres. One is that HrSoxB1 is transcribed by maternal factors localized in a4.2, b4.2, and A4.1 blastomeres but not present in B4.1 blastomeres. The other is that there are transcriptional repressors that are present only in B4.1 blastomeres, and HrSoxB1 is transcribed by general transcription factors that exist throughout the entire embryo.

Our results support the latter possibility. When we injected HrPEM mRNA into fertilized eggs, anterior-vegetal expression of HrSoxB1 was repressed, suggesting the presence of maternal control of HrSoxB1 expression. Pem was first reported in the ascidian Ciona savignyi as a cDNA clone whose mRNA is abundant and is localized to the posterior egg cytoplasm, and is then segregated into B4.1 blastomeres (Yoshida et al., 1996). Although its function in early embryogenesis is still unclear, Pem of both Halocynthia and Ciona has a WRPW tetrapetide in its C-terminus. Since the WRPW motif is characteristic of a group of transcriptional repressors including Hairy/Enhancer of Split family, Pem might also act as a transcriptional repressor. In our experiment, 10 pg of HrPEM RNA did not repress the expression of HrSoxB1 in the animal hemisphere. The reason is still unclear at the moment. Injected mRNA could be preferentially partitioned into the vegetal blastomeres during cleavages. But this is not the case because when we injected lacZ mRNA, the enzyme activity was evenly detected in descendant cells of both animal and vegetal hemispheres. Expression in the animal hemisphere might be controlled by some positive factors. A larger amount of HrPEM RNA might repress HrSoxB1 expression throughout the entire embryo. But when we increased the amount of injected RNA, the cleavage pattern was so disturbed that we could not analyze the gene expression.

In sea urchin embryos, zygotic expression of SpSoxB1 is preferentially activated in the animal hemisphere (Kenny et al., 1999). This factor is the earliest known spatially restricted regulator of transcription along the animal-vegetal axis of the sea urchin embryo. The SpSoxB1 protein interacts with a cis element that is essential for transcription of SpAN, a gene that is activated in the animal hemisphere at early blastula stage. Therefore, the expression of ascidian HrSoxB1 in the animal hemisphere may also have a roles in establishing the fate of animal blastomeres.

Role of HrSoxB1 in early embryogenesis

When HrSoxB1 mRNA was injected into eggs, they developed into short-tailed larvae with a malformed noto-chord. Therefore, we examined the expression of HrBra, a transcription factor that is essential for notochord formation (Yasuo and Satoh, 1998). We showed that HrBra is expressed normally in the notochord precursor cells. However, in addition to the expression in notochord precursors, ectopic expression was observed in B7.5 muscle/trunk ventral cell precursors. It is hard to simply explain at the moment why ectopic expression is restricted to the B7.5 blastomeres. The ectopic expression of HrBra in HrSoxB1-injected embryos and the absence of expression of HrBra and HrSoxB1 in HrPEM-injected embryos (Figs. 4B, E) may suggest that HrSoxB1 is involved in proper expression of HrBra in notochord precursors, although the possibility should be carefully examined in further experiments.

B7.5 blastomeres in HrSoxB1-injected embryos did not eventually differentiate into notochord but developed into muscle cells, as they do in normal embryogenesis, although they expressed ectopic HrBra at the 110-cell stage. This result coincides with the observation that overexpression of HrBra mRNA does not transform all the embryonic blastomeres into notochord (Yasuo and Satoh, 1998). Shimauchi et al. (2001) have revealed that both HNF-3 and HrBra are required for notochord differentiation of ascidian embryos, and that HNF-3 is not expressed in B7.5 blastomeres. This may be the reason why B7.5 blastomeres in HrSoxB1-injected embryos did not eventually differentiate into notochord.

HrSoxB1 and neural development

Vertebrate group B1 Sox genes, Sox2, Sox1, and Sox3, are known to be involved in neural development (reviewed by Sasai, 2000). HrSoxB1 is also specifically expressed in neural tissues during embryogenesis. This suggests a possibility that HrSoxB1 is involved in ascidian neural development. However, the expression of ascidian neural plate marker HrETR-1 precedes the neural expression of HrSoxB1 (Yagi and Makabe, 2001). In addition, overexpression of HrSoxB1 did not affect the expression pattern of HrETR-1 (Fig. 5). In Xenopus, Sox2 alone cannot induce neural development (Mizuseki et al., 1998). Therefore, in ascidian, sole misexpression of HrSoxB1 also might not be sufficient to promote ectopic neural development. Because a Sox2 construct lacking the HMG box is able to act as a dominant negative form and inhibit neural differentiation in Xenopus (Kishi et al., 2000), we made a similar construct with HrSoxB1 lacking the HMG box and injected mutated mRNA into Halocynthia eggs. However, the eggs still developed into normal swimming tadpoles (data not shown).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank members of the Asamushi Marine Biological Station and the Otsuchi Marine Research Center for help in collecting live ascidian adults, and members of the Misaki Marine Biological Laboratory for help in maintaining them. This work was supported by the Research for the Future Program of the Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science (96L00404), and by Grants-inAid from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan (13480245 and13044003) to H. N.

REFERENCES

1.

J. Bowles, G. Schepers, and P. Koopman . 2000. Phylogeny of the SOX family of developmental transcription factors based on sequence and structural indicators. Dev Biol 227:239–255. Google Scholar

2.

S. Chiba, Y. Satou, T. Nishikata, and N. Satoh . 1998. Isolation and characterization of cDNA clones for epidermis-specific and muscle-specific genes in Ciona savignyi embryos. Zool Sci 15:239–246. Google Scholar

3.

J. C. Corbo, A. Di Gregorio, and M. Levine . 2001. The ascidian as a model organism in developmental and evolutionary biology. Cell 106:535–538. Google Scholar

4.

M. O. Dayhoff, R. M. Schwartz, and B. C. Orcutt . 1978. A model of evolutionary change in protein. In “Atlas of protein sequence and structure, Vol 5, suppl 3”. Ed by M. O. Dayhoff National Biomedical Research Foundation. Washngton DC. 345–352. Google Scholar

5.

J. Felsenstein 1993. PHYLIP ver. 3.5. Univ. of Washington. Seattle. Google Scholar

6.

J. Gubbay, J. Collignon, P. Koopman, B. Capel, A. Economou, A. Münsterberg, N. Vivian, P. Goodfellow, and R. Lovell-Badge . 1990. A gene mapping to the sex-determining region of the mouse Y chromosome is a member of a novel family of embryonically expressed genes. Nature 346:245–250. Google Scholar

7.

T. Hirano and H. Nishida . 1997. Developmental fates of larval tissues after metamorphosis in ascidian Halocynthia roretzi. I. Origin of mesodermal tissues of the juvenile. Dev Biol 192:199–210. Google Scholar

8.

A. P. Kenny, D. Kozlowski, D. W. Oleksyn, L. M. Angerer, and R. C. Angerer . 1999. SpSoxB1, a maternally encoded transcription factor asymmetrically distributed among early sea urchin blastomeres. Development 126:5473–5483. Google Scholar

9.

M. Kishi, K. Mizuseki, N. Sasai, H. Yamazaki, K. Shiota, S. Nakanishi, and Y. Sasai . 2000. Requirement of Sox2-mediated signaling for differentiation of early Xenopus neuroectoderm. Development 127:791–800. Google Scholar

10.

T. Miya, K. Morita, A. Suzuki, N. Ueno, and N. Satoh . 1997. Functional analysis of an ascidian homologue of vertebrate Bmp-2/Bmp-4 suggests its role in the inhibition of neural fate specification. Development 124:5149–5159. Google Scholar

11.

T. Miya and H. Nishida . 2002. Isolation of cDNA clones for mRNAs transcribed zygotically during cleavage in the ascidian, Halocynthia roretzi. Dev Genes Evol 212:30–37. Google Scholar

12.

K. Mizuseki, M. Kishi, M. Matsui, S. Nakanishi, and Y. Sasai . 1998. Xenopus Zic-related-1 and Sox-2, two factors induced by chordin, have distinct activities in the initiation of neural induction. Development 125:579–587. Google Scholar

13.

H. Nishida 1997. Cell fate specification by localized cytoplasmic determinants and cell interactions in ascidian embryos. Int Rev Cytol 176:245–306. Google Scholar

14.

H. Nishida 2002. Specification of developmental fates in ascidian embryos: Molecular approach to maternal determinants and signaling molecules. Int Rev Cytol 217:227–276. Google Scholar

15.

H. Nishida and K. Sawada . 2001. macho-1 encodes a localized mRNA in ascidian eggs that specifies muscle fate during embryogenesis. Nature 409:724–729. Google Scholar

16.

T. Nishikata, I. Mita-Miyazawa, T. Deno, and N. Satoh . 1987. Muscle cell differentiation in ascidian embryos analyzed with a tissue-specific monoclonal antibody. Development 99:163–171. Google Scholar

17.

T. Nishikata and N. Satoh . 1987. Specification of notochord cells in the ascidian embryo analyzed with a specific monoclonal antibody. Cell Differ Dev 30:43–53. Google Scholar

18.

T. Nishikata, L. Yamada, Y. Mochizuki, Y. Satou, T. Shin-i, Y. Kohara, and N. Satoh . 2001. Profiles of maternally expressed genes in fertilized eggs of Ciona intestinalis. Dev Biol 238:315–333. Google Scholar

19.

Y. Sasai 2001. Roles of Sox factors in neural determination: conserved signaling in evolution? Int J Dev Biol 45:321–326. Google Scholar

20.

N. Saitou and M. Nei . 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425. Google Scholar

21.

N. Satoh 1994. Developmental Biology of Ascidian. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. Google Scholar

22.

Y. Satou, T. Kusakabe, I. Araki, and N. Satoh . 1995. Timing of initiation of muscle-specific gene expression in the ascidian embryo precedes that of developmental fate restriction in lineage cells. Dev Growth Differ 37:319–327. Google Scholar

23.

Y. Shimauchi, H. Yasuo, and N. Satoh . 1997. Autonomy of ascidian fork head/HNF-3 gene expression. Mech Dev 69:143–154. Google Scholar

24.

Y. Shimauchi, S. Chiba, and N. Satoh . 2001. Synergistic action of HNF-3 and Brachyury in the notochord differentiation of ascidian embryos. Int J Dev Biol 45:643–652. Google Scholar

25.

M. Wegner 1999. From head to toes: the multiple facets of Sox proteins. Nuc Aci Res 27:1409–1420. Google Scholar

26.

J. R. Whittaker 1973. Segregation during ascidian embryogenesis of egg cytoplasmic information for tissue-specific enzyme development. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 70:2096–2100. Google Scholar

27.

K. Yagi and K. W. Makabe . 2001. Isolation of an early neural maker gene abundantly expressed in the nervous system of the ascidian, Halocynthia roretzi. Dev Genes Evol 211:49–53. Google Scholar

28.

H. Yasuo and N. Satoh . 1994. An ascidian homolog of the mouse Brachyury (T) gene is expressed exclusively in notochord cells at the fate restricted stage. Dev Growth Differ 36:9–18. Google Scholar

29.

H. Yasuo and N. Satoh . 1998. Conservation of the developmental role of Brachyury in notochord formation in a urochordate, the ascidian Halocynthia roretzi. Dev Biol 200:158–170. Google Scholar

30.

S. Yoshida, Y. Marikawa, and N. Satoh . 1996. Posterior end mark, a novel maternal gene encoding a localized factor in the ascidian embryo. Development 122:2005–2012. Google Scholar
Takahito Miya and Hiroki Nishida "Expression Pattern and Transcriptional Control of SoxB1 in Embryos of the Ascidian Halocynthia roretzi," Zoological Science 20(1), 59-67, (1 January 2003). https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.20.59
Received: 21 August 2002; Accepted: 1 October 2002; Published: 1 January 2003
JOURNAL ARTICLE
9 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top