Three new and two known species of the Drosophila (Sophophora) obscura species-group are reported from Yunnan Province, southern China. The sinobscura species-subgroup is newly established by D. sinobscura, D. hubeiensis and D. luguensis sp. nov. Geographic distribution of the obscura group in and around China is discussed, and a key to 10 Chinese species of the obscura group is provided.
The Drosophila (Sophophora) obscura species-group has been well studied in the field of evolutionary genetics since Dobzhansky and co-workers employed North American members of this group, Drosophila pseudoobscura Frolova, 1929, D. miranda Dobzhansky, 1935, and D. persimilis Dobzhansky & Epling, 1944, as materials for their intensive serial studies, “Genetics of Natural Populations”, from Dobzhansky and Queal (1938) to Powell et al. (1976). This species-group presently includes 38 species and 3 subspecies. Most of them are distributed throughout the temperate zone of the Northern Hemisphere, with several species extending to tropical America (Throckmorton, 1975; Lakovaara and Saura, 1982) and a few species in the Afro-tropical region (Cariou et al., 1988). The overall phylogenetic relationships within this group are still not well resolved, in spite of a number of previous studies on the phylogeny. Ambiguities still exist in some aspects such as: (1) Geographic origin of this group: Tropical African region or East Asian region? (2) History of the New World species: monophyletic or paraphyletic? (3) The phylogenetic positions of a few Old World species, such as D. subsilvestris Hardy & Kaneshiro, 1968, D. bifasciata Pomini, 1940 and D. tsukubaensis Takamori & Okada, 1983, are ill-defined. Thus, more evidence, such as biogeographic information, would be indispensable for fully understanding the evolution of this group.
China had long been unexploited territory for the study of this group. Faunal surveys of drosophilid flies in the last decade uncovered the presence of the obscura group from China. Watabe et al. (1993) first reported 4 known species of this group from Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, northwestern China. Thereafter, two new species of this group, Drosophila sinobscura Watabe, 1996 from Taiwan Island and Drosophila hubeiensis Sperlich & Watabe, 1997 from Hubei Province, central China, were discovered (Watabe et al., 1996; Watabe and Sperlich, 1997).
Since 2000, we have engaged in a field survey in Yunnan Province, southern China, and found three new and two known species of the obscura group. In the present article, the new species are described with the establishment of a new species-subgroup, the sinobscura subgroup. A faunal comparison of the obscura group is made between southern China and several districts in the Palearctic Region, and a key to all 10 Chinese species of the obscura group is provided.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Observation: External morphology was observed under a stereoscopic microscope, and metric characters were measured with an ocular micrometer. The male and female terminalia were detached from the body, treated with 10% KOH solution around 80°C for several min, and observed in a droplet of glycerol under a compound light microscope. Drawings were made with an ocular, mesh micrometer.
Laboratory rearing: Some morphological variations were detected between two allopatric populations of D. hubeiensis. Two representative iso-female strains were used for morphological comparisons: the Yunnan population (HY), collected from Gaoligongshan Nature Reserve, western Yunnan, and established in August 2000, and the Hubei population (HH), collected from Shennongjia Nature Reserve, Hubei, and established in July 1992. The adult flies were allowed to oviposit in a glass vial (30 mm in diameter, 105 mm in height) on usual Drosophila medium (10 ml) consisting of Baker's yeast-sucrose-cornmeal-agar (Watabe et al., 1996). The rearing vials were maintained in incubator at 20±2°C under continuous light.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Establishment of the Drosophila sinobscura species-subgroup
When Sturtevant (1942) originally established the obscura group, he classified it into 2 species-subgroups, the affinis subgroup consisting of New World species and the obscura subgroup consisting of both New and Old World species. Since then, 3 more subgroups have been added: the Old World subobscura, the New World pseudoobscura and the Afro-tropical microlabis (Buzzati-Traverso and Scossiroli, 1955; Lakovara and Saura, 1982; O'Grady, 1999), leaving several species unassigned to any subgroup. Three species recently found from mainland China and Taiwan, D. sinobscura, D. hubeiensis and D. luguensis sp. nov., share a number of morphological characters and are all easily discriminated from the known subgroups by the diagnostic characters indicated below. Thus, we newly establish the sinobscura subgroup in the obscura group. In addition to morphological similarities, these three members constitute a compact cluster in the unrooted neighbor-joining dendro-grams based on allozyme data and nucleotide sequences of the nuclear Adh gene and the mitochondrial ND2 gene (Gao et al., unpublished data)
Diagnosis. Scutum and scutellum black, without any longitudinal stripes. Acrostichal setulae in 8 rows. First tarsomeres of ♂ foreleg slightly longer than 2nd tarsomere, with large sex-comb present on both tarsomeres (Fig. 1A). Epandrium dark brown, with ventral portion paler. Median piece of decasternum broadened, narrower than long, apically truncate or rounded. Aedeagus narrow, 1/3-1/4 of width of hypandrium; lateral plates sclerotized, apically with triangular expansion. Hypandrium pale brown, caudomedi-ally slightly notched, with 1 pair of tiny paramedian setae on caudal margin. Spermatheca cone-shaped; introvert shallow, less than 1/2 height of outer capsule.
Descriptions of obscura group species from Yunnan
Morphological characters commonly seen in all species examined (presence of dense interfacetal setulae on eye, coloration of pedicel, ocellar triangle and frons, chaetotaxy of postpronotal lobe, etc.) are referred to in the description of the first species but not repeated for the other species.
Drosophila (Sophophora) luguensis Gao & Toda sp. nov. (Fig. 1A-K)
♂, ♀. Head: Eye red, with thick interfacetal setulae. Ocellar triangle black. Pedicel dark brown, with a few setae; 1st flagellomere grayish brown. Frons black, 0.41 in holo-type (range in 19 paratypes: 0.41–0.55) as broad as head, with several interfrontal setulae. Arista with 3 dorsal and 2 ventral branches besides terminal bifurcation. Anterior reclinate orbital seta (Orb2) 0.45 (0.32–0.50) length of posterior reclinate orbital seta (Orb1); proclinate orbital seta (Orb3) 0.83 (0.64–0.92) length of Orb1. Face black; facial carina dark brown, moderate. Clypeus black. Gena brown, 0.29 (0.27–0.31) as broad as maximum diameter of eye. Subvibrissal seta (Or2) 0.45 (0.39–0.56) length of vibrissa (Or1). Palpus yellow, with 1 prominent apical seta and several ventral ones.
Thorax: Scutum and scutellum black, without longitudinal stripes. Postpronotal lobe dark brown, with 2 prominent setae (Hu). Anterior dorsocentral seta (DcA) 0.45 (0.45– 0.76) length of posterior dorsocentral one (DcP); length distance of dorsocentral setae 0.47 (0.33–0.56) cross distance. Acrostichal setulae (Ac) in 8 rows. Anterior/posterior katepisternal seta length (Sterno-index) 0.57 (0.47–0.61).
Wing hyaline, slightly clouded along costa in ♂. Veins brown; R2+3 gently curved to costa at tip; R4+5 and M1 nearly parallel. Wing indices: C=2.93 (2.63–3.28); 4V=1.98 (1.70– 2.50); 4C=0.88 (0.83–1.05); 5x=1.91 (1.31–2.01); Ac=2.55 (2.23–2.68); C3F=0.33 (0.31–0.43). C1 setae 2, less-differentiated. Halters white.
Legs yellowish brown. Foreleg 1st tarsomere slightly longer than 2nd tarsomere. Sex-comb teeth 10 (9-11) on 1st tarsomere, 8 (8-10) on 2nd tarsomere (Fig. 1A).
Abdomen: Tergites uniformly brownish black; sternites gray in ♂, pale gray in ♀.
Male terminalia (Fig. 1B-I): Epandrium dark brown, paler on ventral portion, lacking pubescence, with 5 (range in 9 ♂ paratypes: 4–6) setae along posterior margin of upper half and 19 (15-21) setae on caudo-ventral margin of lower half. Surstylus pale brown, with 8 (7-9) peg-like prensisetae and ca. 15 trichoid setae. Cercus oval, brown, glabrous, with 30 (27–35) setae distributed thickly ventrally and sparsely dorsally. Decasternum less-sclerotized; median lobe rectangular; lateral flap large. Aedeagus yellowish brown, narrow (ca. 1/4 of hypandrial width), articulated with apodeme; lateral plates sclerotized, apically with triangular expansion, basally with quadrate knob in lateral view; median membrane covered with numerous wart-like serrations; apodeme dark brown, 2.28 (2.03–2.31) times as long as aedeagus. Paramere longer than aedeagus, sword-shaped in lateral view, apically pointed, with 6 minute sensilla arranged longitudinally on basal to subapical, lateral surface. Gonopods as long as aedeagus, apically fused to aedeagal, basal process. Hypandrium pale brown, caudo-medially slightly notched, with 1 pair of tiny paramedian setae on caudal margin. Ejaculatory apodeme plate pale brown, quadrate; stalk dark brown, longer than apical plate.
Female terminalia (Fig. 1J-K): Oviscapt yellowish brown, with 2–3 lateral and 11–17 marginal peg-like ovisensilla and subterminal trichoid seta; antero-ventral bridge long. Spermatheca dark brown, cone-shaped; introvert ca. 2/5 height of outer capsule.
Measurements: Body length = 2.33 mm (range in 9 ♂ paratypes: 1.92–2.56, range in 10 ♀ paratypes: 2.93–3.39). Thorax length including scutellum = 1.03 mm (♂ : 0.81–1.11; : 1.16–1.29). Wing length = 2.56 mm (♂ : 2.10–2.67; ♀ : 2.65–2.97), and its width = 1.10 mm (♂ : 0.92-1.19; ♀: 1.14–1.32).
Holotype, ♂, China: Lugu Lake Nature Reserve, (ca. 2800–3000 m above sea level), Lijiang, Yunnan Province, 26.vii.2001, ex banana traps (Gao and Watabe leg.); deposited in Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yunnan, China (KIZ).
Paratypes, China: 9 ♂, 25.vii.2001; 20 ♂, 26.vii.2001; 15 ♂, 27.vii.2001, same collection site as holotype; 16 ♂, 15, offspring from iso-female line, collected in the type locality and established on 25-26.vii.2001; 50 ♂, 5 ♀ deposited ♀ in KIZ, and 10 ♂, 10 ♀ in Systematic Entomology, the Hokkaido University Museum, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan (SEHU).
Relationships and diagnosis.
Drosophila luguensis can be clearly distinguished from D. sinobscura and D. hubeiensis by the aedeagus with serrations on median membrane and with the quadrate knob at base (in both D. sinobscura and D. hubeiensis, the aedeagus is smooth on the median membrane and the basal knob is triangular). Further, the phallosomal index (the relative length of aedeagal apodeme to the aedeagus) of D. luguensis (2.03–2.31) is larger than those of D. sinobscura (1.51–1.84) and D. hubeiensis (1.49– 1.67).
Drosophila (Sophophora) dianensis Gao & Watabe sp. nov. (Fig. 2A-L)
♂, ♀. Head: Pedicel dark yellow; 1st flagellomere grayish yellow. Frons 0.48 in holotype (range in 7 paratypes: 0.46–0.53) as broad as head. Arista with 3 dorsal and 2 ventral branches. Orb2 0.45 (0.30–0.49) length of Orb1; Orb3 0.74 (0.64–0.77) length of Orb1. Face black; facial carina broadened, dark yellow. Gena 0.30 (0.26–0.35) as broad as maximum diameter of eye. Or2 weak, 0.60 (0.45–0.64) length of Or1. Palpus yellow, with 1 prominent apical seta and 1 lateral one.
Thorax: Scutum black, without longitudinal stripes; scutellum dark brown, marginally black. DcA 0.67 (0.61– 0.70) length of DcP; length distance of dorsocentral setae 0.41 (0.38–0.52) cross distance. Ac in 8 regular rows. Sterno-index 0.51 (0.51–0.60).
Wing pale yellow. Indices: C=2.88 (2.32–3.00); 4V=1.93 (1.88–2.50); 4C=0.93 (0.88–1.29); 5x=2.12 (1.80–2.22); Ac=2.47 (2.31–3.05), C3F=0.34 (0.34–0.49).
Legs dark brown. Foreleg 1st tarsomere much longer than 2nd tarsomere. Sex-combs strongly oblique against main axis of tarsomeres, with 4 (4–6) teeth on 1st tarsomere and 3 (3-5) teeth on 2nd tarsomere (Fig. 2A).
Abdomen: Tergites brownish black, with small faint pale spot on antero-ventral corner of 4T and distinct pale spots on antero-ventral corner of 5–6Ts in ♀ (Fig. 2B). Sternites pale gray, with 13 (11–15) fine setae on ♂ 5S.
Male terminalia (Fig. 2C-J): Epandrium dark brown, ventrally paler, lacking pubescence, with 3 (range in 3 paratypes: 4–6) setae along posterior margin and 14 (15– 19) setae on caudo-ventral portion. Surstylus dark brown, with 10 (9–10) peg-like prensisetae and 16 (14–16) trichoid setae. Cercus grayish brown, broadened on upper half and gently tapering downward, with 21 (21–23) setae. Decasternum sclerotized; median lobe broadened, nearly quadrate. Aedeagus ca. 1/3 as broad as hypandrium, articulated with apodeme; lateral plate much-sclerotized, with numerous serrations subbasally to subapically and fine setulae anteroventrally; median membrane covered with fine, long (proximally) or short (distally) setulae; apodeme brown, longer than aedeagus. Paramere yellowish brown, as long as aedeagus, sword-shaped in lateral view, apically pointed, with 12–13 min sensilla arranged longitudinally on basal to subapical, lateral surface. Gonopods separated from each other, shorter than aedeagus; aedeagal basal process almost degenerated. Hypandrium pale brown, with 1 pair of tiny paramedian setae on deeply concaved, caudal margin. Ejaculatory apodeme plate brown, gently convex on cephalic margin, with 1 pair of small pits medially; stalk dark brown, longer than apical plate.
Female terminalia (Fig. 2K-L): Oviscapt grayish yellow, with 2–3 lateral and 6–10 marginal ovisensilla; dorsoterminal one trichoid, ca. 2/3 length of ventro-subterminal seta which being as long as maximum width of oviscapt; anteroventral bridge long. Spermatheca brown, cone-shaped; introvert ca. 3/5 height of outer capsule.
Measurements: Body length = 2.25 mm (3 ♂ paratypes: 2.01–2.10; 4 ♀ paratypes: 2.21–2.75). Thorax length including scutellum = 0.92 mm (♂ : 0.92–1.01; ♀: 0.84–1.10). Wing length =1.98 mm (♂ : 2.22–2.32; ♀ : 1.92-2.38), and its width = 0.88 mm (♂ : 1.01–1.10; ♀ : 0.92–1.14 ).
Holotype, ♂, China: Jiao-Ye Park (ca. 1950 m a.s.l.), Kunming, Yunnan, 27.iv.2002, ex banana traps (Gao leg.); deposited in KIZ.
Paratypes, China: 1 ♀, 26.ii.2001; 1 ♀, 1 ♂, 3.iii.2001; 1 ♂, 6.iii.2001; 1 ♂, 13.iii.2001; 1 ♀, 8.iii.2001; 1 ♀, 27.iv.2002, the same collection site as holotype; 2 ♂, 2 ♀ deposited in KIZ, and the remaining in SEHU.
Relationships and diagnosis.
Drosophila dianensis closely resembles D. subsilvestris, which is distributed from Europe to Central Asia, in having the sex-combs with small numbers of teeth, the broadened aedeagus with much-sclerotized lateral plates, the rudimentary basal process of aedeagus and the 2 long trichoid setae at the apex of oviscapt, but can be clearly distinguished from it by the aedeagal lateral plates with serrations in ♂ and by the-absence of pale spots on lateral margins of the 2nd abdominal tergite in ♀ (in D. subsilvestris, the aedeagal lateral plates are smooth and the ♀ 2nd tergite has pale spots on its lateral margins).
Drosophila (Sophophora) limingi Gao & Watabe sp. nov. (Fig. 3A-L)
♂, ♀. Head: First flagellomere of pedicel grayish brown. Frons 0.45 in holotype (range in 7 paratypes: 0.43– 0.54) as broad as head. Arista with 3 (3–4) dorsal and 2 (2– 3) ventral branches. Orb2 0.42 (0.38–0.48) length of Orb 1; Orb3 0.68 (0.61–0.76) length of Orb1. Gena yellowish brown, 0.40 (0.30–0.47) as broad as maximum diameter of eye. Or2 0.50 (0.32–0.54) length of Or1. Palpus with 1 prominent apical seta and several ventral ones.
Thorax: Scutum and scutellum black, without longitudinal stripes. DcA 0.65 (0.65–0.71) length of DcP; length distance of dorsocentral setae 0.62 (0.36–0.62) of cross distance. Ac in 8 rows. Sterno-index 0.51 (0.47–0.55).
Wing hyaline, slightly clouded. Veins brown. Indices: C=2.70 (2.30–3.20); 4V=2.49 (1.82–2.33); 4C=1.26 (0.91– 1.30); 5x=1.76 (1.68–2.33); Ac=2.40 (2.20–2.70), C3F=0.33 (0.31–0.42). Halters pale yellow.
Legs dark brown; tibiae and tarsi paler. Foreleg 1st tarsomere ca. 1.8 times as long as 2nd tarsomere. Sex-comb teeth 10 (8–11) on 1st tarsomere and 10 (8–11) on 2nd tarsomere (Fig. 3A).
Abdomen: Tergites brownish black, anteriorly narrowly pale yellow on 4-6Ts in ♀ (Fig. 3B). Sternites dark gray in ♂, pale gray in ♀.
Male terminalia (Fig. 3C-J): Epandrium yellowish brown, glabrous, with 4 (range in 4 ♂ paratypes: 3–7) setae along posterior margin of upper half and 27 (22–29) setae on ventral margin of lower half. Surstylus brown, with 10 (9– 10) peg-like prensisetae and 15 (15–21) trichoid setae, and hook-shaped projection strongly curved inward at dorsocaudal corner. Cercus oval, ventrally darker, with 28 (24–30) setae nearly evenly distributed. Decasternum comprising broadened median lobe (dark area somewhat polygonal) and flap-bearing lateral arms. Aedeagus yellowish brown, narrow (ca. 1/4 of hypandrial width), articulated with apodeme, with fine setulae; caudo-ventrally; lateral plates sclerotized, apically expanded triangularly in lateral view; median membrane distally hirsute; apodeme brown, longer than aedeagus. Paramere as long as aedeagus, sword-shaped in lateral view, apically pointed, with 6–7 min sensilla arranged longitudinally from basal to submedial portion on lateral surface. Gonopods separated from each other, slightly shorter than aedeagus, each apically fused to aedeagal basal process. Hypandrium pale brown, caudomedially slightly notched, with 1 pair of small paramedian setae on caudal margin. Ejaculatory apodeme plate light brown, quadrate, with 1 pair of small pits medially; stalk dark brown, longer than apical plate.
Female terminalia (Fig. 3K-L): Oviscapt grayish yellow, with 3–4 lateral and 13–16 marginal peg-like ovisensilla, and 1 subterminal trichoid seta; antero-ventral bridge long. Spermatheca pale brown, cone-shaped; introvert ca. 3/5 height of outer capsule.
Measurements: Body length = 2.01 mm (range in 4 ♂ paratypes: 1.92–2.15, range in 3 ♀ paratypes: 2.21–2.38). Thorax length including scutellum = 0.81 mm (♂ : 0.79–0.89,: 0.80–0.92). Wing length = 1.88 mm (♂ : 1.72–1.99, ♀ : 1.88–2.22), and its width = 0.84 mm (♂ : 0.79–0.97, ♀ 0.88–1.02).
Holotype, ♂, China: Jiao-Ye Park (ca. 1950 m a.s.l.), Kunming, Yunnan Province, 26.iii.2001, ex banana trap (Gao and Watabe leg.); deposited in KIZ.
Paratypes, China: 2 ♂, 1 ♀, 8.iii.2001; 2 ♂, 13.iii.2001; ♀ 1 ♀, 15.iii.2001; 1 ♀, 23.iii.2001; 3 ♂, 26.iii.2001; 1 ♂, 27.iv.2002, same collection site as holotype; 5 ♂, 2 ♀ deposited in KIZ, and the remaining in SEHU.
Relationships and diagnosis.
Drosophila limingi is somewhat similar to D. tsukubaensis in having relatively small numbers of teeth on the sex-combs and the remarkable hook-shaped projection at the dorso-caudal corner of surstylus, and to D. obscura Fallén, 1823 in the general morphology of decasternum, but D. limingi can be distinguished from D. tsukubaensis by the broadened median lobe of decasternum (in D. tsukubaensis it is narrow), and from D. obscura by the large projection at the dorso-caudal corner of surstylus (in D. obscura it is rudimentary), in addition to the setae being distributed evenly on the cercus.
Drosophila (Sophophora) tsukubaensis Takamori & Okada
Drosophila (Sophophora) tsukubaensis Takamori & Okada, 1983: 265.
1 ♂, 13. iii. 2001; 1 ♂, 8. iv. 2002; 1 ♂, 29. iv. 2002; Jiao-Ye Park (ca. 1950 m a.s.l.), Kunming, Yunnan, ex banana traps.
Drosophila (Sophophora) hubeiensis Sperlich & Watabe
Drosophila (Sophophora) hubeiensis Sperlich & Watabe, in Watabe & Sperlich, 1997: 622.
18 ♂, 13 ♀; 11. viii. 2000; from timber piles; 12 ♂, 14 ♀; 15. viii. 2000, ex banana traps in streamsides, Gaoligongshan National Nature Reserve, Yunnan, China, ca. 2300 m a.s.l. (Watabe leg.).
China: Hubei, Sichuan, Yunnan (n. loc.). Geographic variation. Some morphological, but slight, differences are found between the Yunnan population (HY) and the type-locality population of Hubei (HH) in D. hubeiensis. In HY the legs are generally pale brown with dark areas on the lower portion of femur and on the upper portion of tibia and the spermatheca is dark brown, whereas in HH the legs are uniformly dark brown and the spermatheca pale brown. It is well known in many drosophilid species that the body color is more or less changeable owing to rearing temperatures (Watabe, 1977), but the above difference between HY and HH is relatively stable.
Table 1 shows intra-specific variations in 31 quantitative characters between the two geographic populations of D. hubeiensis, HY and HH, reared under the same laboratory conditions described in “Materials and Methods”. As for the characters Nos. 1 to 4 and 8, the comparison was made for each sex separately. The intra-specific differences proved statistically significant (p< 0.05) in 19 (Nos. 1, 3, 4 ♀, 8, 9, 10, 12, 17, 20, 22, 23 and 27–30) out of 36 comparisons, although the ranges overlapped between the two geographic populations in all characters, excepting for No.1 (BL in ♀) and No. 3 (WL). Further, HY is much easier to be reared in the laboratory than HH.
Comparison of 31 quantitative characters between two geographic strains of D. hubeiensis, HY and HH.
Drosophila hubeiensis is distributed from middle to southern China, but is strongly restricted to high mountains at 2000-3000 m a.s.l. It is reasonable to assume that the gene exchange between local populations is severely limited by surrounding lowlands with hot and dry climate. We have detected some differences in cross-ability between geographic strains of D. hubeiensis and its closely related species and will publish the results elsewhere.
Including the 3 new species described in the present study, a total of 10 obscura group species have been recorded from China, and Yunnan is the southern-most location within the distribution range of the obscura group in the Eurasian Continent. The Chinese members of the obscura group are largely divided into two groups from a chorological point of view. Most species found in northern China show Palearctic distribution patterns. Both D. alpina Burla, 1948 and D. bifasciata are widely distributed from Europe to Japan throughout northern China. Drosophila subsilvestris and D. subobscura Collin, 1936 are western Palearctic species, and the eastern border of their distribution lies in the Ili and the Altay Mountains in Xinjiang (Watabe et al., 1993). On the other hand, the species discovered from southern China, D. hubeiensis, D. luguensis, D. limingi and D. dianensis, are endemic to the Oriental Region.
The obscura group species composition of Yunnan (5 spp.) was compared with those of mainland Europe (9 spp.), Central Asia (5 spp.) covering Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan and northwestern China, Northeast Asia (4 spp.) covering northeastern China, Korea and Far East of Russia, and the Japan Islands (5 spp.; Drosophila eniwae Takada, Beppu & Toda, 1979 was excluded from the present analysis, because of its questionable status), based on the following data sources (Bächli and Rocha-Pite, 1981; Wheeler, 1981; Lakovaara and Saura, 1982; Watabe et al., 1993; Watabe and Sidorenko, 1997, etc.). Faunal similarity between two districts was evaluated by Jaccard's coefficient of similarity (Udvardy, 1969):Fig. 4 clearly shows that Yunnan is quite isolated from other districts of the Palearctic Region in the species composition of the obscura group.
Huge arid zones of the Gobi and the Taklamakan in Central Asia may disturb the range expansion of obscura group species between Asia and Europe. In China, the Central Plain spreads along middle and lower reaches of the River Yangtze, and it may also disturb the faunal exchange in montane drosophilids between southern and northern China. Since the obscura group is undoubtedly a temperate forest element of drosophilid fauna in the Northern Hemisphere, it is likely that those geographic barriers have restricted their range expansion and have reinforced genetic differentiation leading to speciation. The present faunal study clearly demonstrates that southern China is an important place where an adaptive radiation of the obscura group might have occurred.
Check-list of obscura group species in China
The obscura species-subgroup
Drosophila (Sophophora) alpina Burla, 1948
China (Xinjiang); Europe, Russia, Mongolia, Korea, Japan
D. (S.) bifasciata Pomini, 1940
China (Heilongjiang, Jilin, Xinjiang, Jiangsu*, Sichuan*, Zhejiang*, Yunnan*, Taiwan*); Europe, Russia, Turkmenia, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Korea, Japan, India* (Some previous records with asterisks should be reexamined in the light of the present knowledge.)
D. (S.) dianensis sp. nov.
D. (S.) subsilvestris Hardy & Kaneshiro, 1968
China (Xinjiang); Europe, Russia
The sinobscura species-subgroup
D. (S.) hubeiensis Sperlich & Watabe, 1997
China (Hubei, Sichuan, Yunnan)
D. (S.) luguensis sp. nov.
D. (S.) sinobscura Watabe, 1996
The subobscura species-subgroup
D. (S.) subobscura Collin, 1936
China (Xinjiang); Azores Is., Madeira Is., Canary Is., northern Africa, Europe, Russia, Near East, Turkmenia, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Chile
Key to the species
Blackish species with sex-combs on ♂ 1st and 2nd tarsomeres; palpus with 1 prominent seta at tip; testis not or only slightly coiled; ventral receptacle usually short; female oviscapt usually white (Drosophila (Sophophora) obscura species-group).................................................. 1
First tarsomere of ♂ foreleg nearly as long as 2nd tarsomere ........................................................................................ 2 —First tarsomere of ♂ foreleg longer than 1.5 times of 2nd tarsomere ................................................................ 6
Abdominal, anterior tergites pale; sex-combs occupying entire lengths of 1st and 2nd tarsomeres; surstylus without teeth-like prensisetae.............................. alpina Burla —Anterior, abdominal tergites dark; sex-combs not occupying entire lengths of 1st and 2nd tarsomeres; surstylus with teeth-like prensisetae ............................................. 3
C3F>0.5............................................... subobsucra Collin —C3F 0.5 ..................................................................... 4
Aedeagal, median membrane covered with numerous serrations; aedeagal apodeme longer than 2 times of aedeagus.............................................. luguensis sp. nov —Aedeagal, median membrane without serrations; aedeagal apodeme shorter than 2 times of aedeagus.......... 5
Legs dark brown...............hubeiensis Sperlich & Watabe —Legs brown .................................... sinobscura Watabe
Sex-combs strongly oblique against main axis of tarsomeres, with side teeth diverged outwards and less than 5 teeth in distal sex-comb; female with distinct pale spots on abdominal tergites and 2 long, trichoid setae at apex of oviscapt ...................................................................... 7 —Sex-combs slightly oblique against main axis of tarsomeres, with side teeth not or only slightly diverged outwards and more than 6 teeth in distal sex-comb; female without pale spots on abdominal tergites and with only 1 long, trichoid setae at apex of oviscapt ......................... 8
Female with distinct pale spots on 5-6Ts and small, faint pale spots on 4T; aedeagus laterally with serrations ...... .............................................................dianensis sp. nov. —Female with pale spots on 2T and 4-7Ts; aedeagus laterally without serrations................................................ .......................................subsilvestris Hardy & Kaneshiro
Cercus with setae nearly evenly distributed over; median lobe of decasternum broad ......................limingi sp. nov. —Lower portion of cercus with more or less dense setae; median lobe of decasternum narrow ............................. 9
Scutum with 2 obscure, longitudinal stripes (difficult to observe in dark specimens); apical tarsomeres darker than proximal ones; median lobe of decasternum long; anteroventral bridge of oviscapt long.............bifasciata Pomini —Scutum without longitudinal stripes; tarsomeres unicolor; median lobe of decasternum small, triangular; anteroventral bridge of oviscapt short.............................. ..................................... tsukubaensis Takamori & Okada
The authors wish to express sincere thanks to the following persons for invaluable comments on this manuscript and kind help in field collections and laboratory rearing: Prof. R.p. Kuang (Southwest Forestry College, Kunming), Dr. H. Takamori (Tokyo Gakugei University), Dr. H.-w. Chen (Tokyo Metropolitan University), Dr. J. –g. Xiang-Yu (KIZ), Dr. L.-p. He (KIZ), and Mr. B. Duan (Yunnan Agricultural University). This work was supported by NSFC (39930100, 30024004), CAS (KSCX2-1-05), and JSPS (No.12375002).