Translator Disclaimer
1 January 2012 Inheritance Patterns of Lateral Dimorphism Examined through Breeding Experiments in Tanganyikan Cichlid (Julidochromis transcriptus) and Japanese Medaka (Oryzias latipes)
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The asymmetry of mouth morphology, in which the mouth opens either leftward or rightward, is a unique example of antisymmetry that is widely found in fishes, such as Tanganyikan scale-eating cichlids, herbivorous cichlids, and the Japanese freshwater goby. This dimorphism is thought to be heritable in a Mendelian manner similar to that of the dominance of the lefty allele over righty, with homozygotes of lefty alleles being absent. This study aims to reveal whether this trait is inherited in the same Mendelian manner in fishes other than those examined to date, and whether the absence of the dominant homozygote is due to a lethal effect. We conducted F1 and F2 breeding experiments using the Tanganyikan cichlid Julidochromis transcriptus and Japanese medaka Oryzias latipes. For both J. transcriptus and O. latipes, the F1 generations produced by incrossing lefty parents showed a lefty:righty ratio of 2:1, whereas incrosses of righties produced only righty offspring. Test crosses between lefty and righty produced a 1:1 ratio of lefty and righty offspring. These results are consistent with the inheritance model in which righty is homozygous for a recessive righty allele and lefty is heterozygous for dominant lefty and recessive righty alleles, in agreement with previous observations. The F2 test cross also confirmed this pattern. Furthermore, no lethal effects on hatchability of O. latipes were detected, refuting the suggestion that the dominant homozygote is embryonic lethal. We conclude that mouth laterality is inherited in the same Mendelian manner in these two species, similar to that other fish species studied previously. However, the reason for absence of the dominant homozygote remains unclear.

INTRODUCTION

Morphological asymmetry of the mouth was first described in seven species of Tanganyikan scale-eating cichlids belonging to the genus Perissodus (Liem and Stewart, 1976; Hori, 1991, 1993). In these fishes, the mouth of one morph type (designated “lefty”; Nakajima et al., 2004) opens to the right with the left side of the head facing the front, while in the other (“righty”), the mouth opens to the left with the right side of the head facing forwards. Such morphological laterality has been reported in several other fishes, including the Tanganyikan cichlids Telmatochromis temporalis (Mboko et al., 1998), Neolamprologus moorii (Hori et al., 2007), and Neolamprologus fasciatus (Takeuchi and Hori, 2008), the scale-eating tricanthodid Macrorhamphosodes uradoi (Nakae and Sasaki, 2001), the Japanese riverine goby Rhinogobius flumineus (Seki et al., 2000), and the large-mouth bass Micropterus salmoides (Nakajima et al., 2007; Yasugi and Hori, 2011).

This morphological laterality is closely associated with behavioral laterality. The scale-eating cichlid, Perrisodus microlepis, is a well-known example in which righty individuals always attack the right flank of the prey, while lefties attack the left flank (Hori, 1993). This biased attack causes prey fishes to be more vigilant on the side of the body that is attacked more frequently; as a consequence, predation success is decreased in the numerically dominant morph (either lefty or righty) of P. microlepis (Hori, 1993). This is a case of negative frequency-dependent selection, and the frequency of lefty and righty morphs oscillates around unity (Hori, 1993).

It has been suggested that this morphological laterality in Perissodus microlepis is inherited in a Mendelian manner, with a one-locus two-allele model in which the lefty allele is dominant over the righty allele (Hori, 1993; Hori et al., 2007). In addition, the observed segregation ratios indicate the absence of the dominant homozygote. The inheritance of mouth laterality has been examined in other fish species, i.e., R. flumineus (Seki et al., 2000) and the Tanganyikan algae-eating cichlid N. moorii (Hori et al., 2007), and these studies support the same pattern of inheritance. However, the mechanism responsible for the lack of the dominant homozygote is unclear. This may be due to high mortality in the developmental stage (Seki et al., 2000). To investigate this, we performed laboratory-based breeding experiments and analyzed the segregation ratios and hatchability of each pairing.

Perrisodus microlepis would be the ideal model for such breeding experiments as many ecological studies have examined laterality in this species. However, breeding of this species is highly sensitive to rearing conditions, and we have not yet established a breeding system. We therefore used Julidochromis transcriptus, a sponge-eating and substrate-brooding cichlid fish endemic to Lake Tanganyika, in this study. We also conducted cross experiments using Oryzias latipes, which is a freshwater fish native to Japan, Korea, and China that has been used as a model organism for developmental and genetics studies (Ozato et al., 1992).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fishes

Julidochromis transcriptus individuals were obtained from a commercial vendor in Osaka, Japan. A total of 15 males and 15 females were used for breeding experiments. Sex was determined by examining the form of the outer genital tract under a binocular microscope. Before pairing, all individuals were maintained in aquaria until maturity, reaching a standard length (SL) of at least 5.0 cm.

Wild O. latipes were collected from the Kamigamo Experimental Forest Station of Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan, in May 2004. The sex of individuals was determined by examining the lengths of the anal fins, and mature females and males were kept in separate aquaria.

Crossing scheme and assessment of laterality

The mouth laterality of individuals was checked under a binocular microscope using previously described methods (Seki et al., 2000; Hori et al., 2007). Individuals in which the right side of the head was more developed than the left side, specifically those in which the right joint of the mandible to the suspensorium was positioned frontward and outward compared to the left joint, were classed as righty (Liem and Stewart, 1976). Lefty individuals were the mirror image of righty. Thus, if the mouth opened rightward, the individual was classified as a lefty, and conversely if the mouth opened leftward it was classified as a righty.

The mouth laterality of parents (P0) was determined prior to the cross experiments. Individuals were anesthetized with 5% phenoxy-ethanol for a few minutes, and the laterality was determined under a binocular microscope. The fishes were then allowed to recover for two to three days before pairing. After the breeding experiments, the P0 fish had either died or were anesthetized with 5% phenoxy-ethanol and preserved in either Davidson solution (deionized water, 347 ml/l; acetic acid, 111 ml/l; ethanol, 320 ml/l; 10% formaldehyde solution, 222 ml/l) or 10% formaldehyde solution, and their laterality was confirmed under a binocular microscope.

The single-pair cross experiments were designed such that at least two replicates were conducted with four combinations of parental lateralities as follows: lefty × lefty (L × L), lefty male × righty female (L♂ × R♀), righty male × lefty female (R♂ × L♀), and righty × righty (R × R). Successful broods, as determined by the number of offspring (> 10), were selected from each combination as replicates.

The F1 individuals were raised until sexual maturity, then anesthetized with 5% phenoxyethanol and preserved in either Davidson solution or 10% formalin, except for individuals used for F2 test crosses. The laterality of each offspring was judged using the method described above. The standard lengths of F1 individuals used for the analyses were 1.8–9.5 cm for J. transcriptus and 1.2– 3.0 cm for O. latipes.

F2 test crosses were conducted to examine the heterozygosity of the lefty individuals and the homozygosity of the righty individuals. To examine heterozygosity of the lefty individuals, pairing was conducted between a lefty F1 from L × L P0s and a righty F1 from R × R P0s. To examine homozygosity of the righty individuals, pairing was conducted between two righty F1 from R × R P0s. Each pairing scheme was conducted in at least two replicates.

F2 individuals obtained from these parings were raised for more than two months, to ≥ 1.8 cm and ≥ 1.5 cm SL for J. transcriptus and O. latipes, respectively. Finally, we successfully obtained seven pairs for the test crosses of J. transcriptus and five pairs for O. latipes. These F2 individuals were preserved and their laterality was examined using the procedures described above. The segregation ratio was examined using the χ2 test for goodness of fit to the expected rates based on the Mendelian one-locus two allele model with lefty being dominant over righty, and the dominant homozygote lethal, χ2 test was conducted on the segregation ratio of every pairs and the total ratio of each cross experiment separately. As a result, no test detected significant difference, excluding the risk of type I error caused by multiple comparisons.

For J. transcriptus, pairing was conducted in 50 L (30 × 60 × 36 cm3) or 27 L (30 × 45 × 30 cm3) tanks maintained under a 14/10 h dark/light cycle at 26°C. An artificial nest was made using two slate tiles (10 × 10 × 0.5 cm3) with an entrance width of 3.0 cm (Kohda et al., 2009), and placed in each breeding tank. Females laid all of their eggs on these tiles, and the slate with eggs was carefully transferred to a 3 L aquarium. Dead eggs were counted and removed from the tiles with tweezers every day until hatching. As the egg membrane of J. transcriptus is opaque, it was not possible to determine the cause of death, in contrast to the case of O. latipes described below. The juvenile fish were fed with live brine shrimp, and thereafter with commercially available flake food (SeraSan®).

Oryzias latipes pairing was conducted in a 1 L tank maintained under a 14/10 h dark/light cycle at 23°C. The eggs were usually collected in the morning soon after the light was turned on. Eggs were removed from the belly of females gently with a small hand net, preserved in a dish with egg water (0.65% NaCl, 0.04% KCl, 0.1% NaHCO3), and maintained in an incubator at 260C until hatching. The development of O. latipes eggs was checked by eye or under a binocular microscope. Dead eggs were counted and removed from the dish daily, and the dead eggs were divided into fertilized or non-fertilized groups by checking for the presence or absence of a fertilization membrane through the transparent egg membrane. Hatched larvae from each brood were transferred to a 1 L tank and fed commercial powdered food (Ranchuu-kizoku®) and live brine shrimp. Fish were reared and handled in accordance with the Guidelines for Animal Experimentation of Kyoto University.

RESULTS

Morphological laterality in the mouth

All individuals of J. transcriptus and O. latipes were distinguished as lefty or righty based on whether the mouth opened leftward or rightward in the ventral view (Fig. 1). With reference to the jaw morphology of O. latipes (Werneburg and Hertwig, 2009), the joint of the mandible to the suspensorium is positioned asymmetrically, and the dominant side is placed toward the front and outward.

Fig. 1.

Ventral view of mouth opening of (A) J. transcriptus and (B) O. latipes. In lefty individuals, the mouth opens toward the left, while in righties it does so in the opposite direction. Note that the lines between the right and left ventral corners of the retroarticular do not cross perpendicular to the vertical lines that indicate the midlines of the bodies, and that these slant to the left or right in lefty and righty, respectively.

f01_49.jpg

Egg fertilization ratio and hatchability

Egg fertilization ratios of O. latipes were not significantly different in the L × L, L × R, or R × R P0s pairing schemes (Table 1; Kruskal-Wallis test, H = 1.631, P > 0.05), and were > 90% in all crosses.

Eggs of J. transcriptus and O. latipes normally hatched 2–3 days and 10–12 days after oviposition, respectively. Hatchability did not differ significantly among crossing types in either fish species (Table 2; Kruskal-Wallis test: J. transcriptus, H = 0.887, P > 0.05; O. latipes, H = 2.349, P > 0.05). The hatching rate of the eggs of O. latipes from L × L F0s was significantly higher than 75% (t-test, t = 12.3, P < 0.001), the expected ratio based on the hypothesis that homozygosity for the dominant allele was lethal. A total of 156 eggs of J. transcriptus did not hatch. The cause of death for O. latipes eggs seemed to be non-fertilization, as dead eggs did not have a fertilization membrane and became moldy one or two days after oviposition.

Table 1.

Fertilization rates (%) in crossing schemes of O. latipes.

t01_49.gif

Table 2.

Percentages of egg hatchability (%) in each cross scheme of O. latipes and J. transcriptus.

t02_49.gif

Table 3.

Segregation ratios of F1 generations in J. transcriptus.

t03_49.gif

Patterns of inheritance of mouth laterality

In the J. transcriptus crossing experiment, the F1 segregation ratios varied among crossing schemes (Table 3). Within each crossing scheme, excluding R × R, the segregation ratio of F1 was not significantly different between any of the pairs (χ2 test: L × L, χ2 = 0.003, P > 0.05; L♂ × R♀, χ2 = 0.072, P > 0.05; R♂ × Lfemale;, χ2 = 0.169, P > 0.05). L × L P0s produced lefty and righty at a ratio of 2:1, L♂ × R♀ P0s and R♂ × L♀ P0s produced lefty and righty at 1:1, and R × R F0s produced only righty (L:R = 0:1).

Table 4.

Segregation ratios of F2 generations in J. transcriptus.

t04_49.gif

Table 5.

Segregation ratios of F1 generations in O. latipes.

t05_49.gif

Table 6.

Segregation ratios of F2 generations in O. latipes.

t06_49.gif

In the test crosses between F1s of J. transcriptus, both L ♂ × R ♀ F1 and R♂ × L♀ F1 produced lefty and righty F2 at a ratio of approximately 1:1 (Table 4). R × R F1 produced only righty F2.

Crossing experiments in O. latipes showed a similar pattern to that of J. transcriptus (Table 5). Within each crossing scheme, excluding R × R, F1 segregation ratios were not significantly different among pairs (χ2 test: L × L, χ2 = 0.166, P > 0.05; L × R♀, χ2 = 0.123, P > 0.05; R♂ × L♀, χ2 = 0.053, P > 0.05). However, the F1 segregation ratios differed markedly among crossing schemes, and L × L P0 produced lefty and righty fish at a ratio of 2:1, L♂ × R♀ P0 and R♂ × L♀ P0 produced lefty and righty at 1:1, and R × R P0 produced only righty. In the test cross between F1, both L♂ × R♂ and R♂ × L♂ F1 parents produced lefty and righty F2 at a ratio of 1:1 and R × R F1 parents produced only righty F2 (Table 6).

DISCUSSION

The Tanganyikan cichlid J. transcriptus and Japanese medaka O. latipes show morphological antisymmetry in mouth opening. Consequently, every individual has either a left or right dominant side of the mandible, and its mouth opens either rightward or leftward, respectively. The pattern of laterality appears to follow a type of Mendelian inheritance; the lefty allele is dominant over the righty allele, but there is a lack of fish homozygous for the dominant lefty allele. The same inheritance pattern has been reported previously for laterality in three other fish species (Hori, 1993; Seki et al., 2000; Hori et al., 2007). Therefore, our data are in accordance with the inheritance patterns observed in previous studies, and indicate that this pattern is applicable to a wide range of fishes. Mouth laterality is a qualitative trait in which every individual opens its mouth either leftward or rightward. In fact, asymmetry index calculated by the difference between right and left mandible structure shows discontinuous bimodal distribution in fishes examined to date (Hori, 1991; Mboko et al., 1998; Hori et al., 2007; Takeuchi and Hori, 2008; Yasugi and Hori, 2011). Therefore, this laterality seems to be influenced by a single gene with a major effect.

The absence of the dominant homozygote, which was predicted in a previously proposed inheritance model (Hori et al., 2007), was also suggested by the results of this breeding experiment. However, the cause of this absence was not fully explained by our results that excluded a possible lethal effect in the embryonic stage during which most genes responsible for jaw morphogenesis are expressed (Wittbrodt, 2002), although we cannot exclude the possibility of a lethal effect after hatching.

Alternatively, there may have been cross-incompatibility in this study (Hori et al., 2007). Cross-incompatibility is considered to be the failure of gametes to fuse due to physiological and/or morphological mechanisms (Ballry, 1999), and is widely observed in plants (e.g., Rashid and Peterson, 1992; Matsubara et al., 2003). This mechanism, however, does not fully explain the observed results, as this hypothesis suggests that lefty parents should have produced F1 with a lefty:righty ratio of 3:1, but this did not occur. In addition, fertilization rates did not change among crossing schemes in O. latipes. Thus, there appears to be another factor involved in the absence of lefty allele homozygotes. Nevertheless, our results suggest that mouth laterality is regulated by the same genetic factors in J. transcriptus and O. latipes, as well as other fishes investigated to date (Hori, 1993; Seki et al., 2000; Hori et al., 2007). These results further suggest that the heritable laterality of jaw morphology may be prevalent and maintained by common, simple mechanisms among various fish species. A recent study suggested that morphological laterality is closely associated with behavioral laterality. For example, largemouth bass (M. salmoides) showed strong correlations between mouth laterality and their direction of movement during predation (Nakajima et al., 2007). Similarly, the shrimp-eating cichlid fish N. fasciatus in Lake Tanganyika shows lateralized hunting behavior related to morphological laterality; i.e., lefty individuals bend their bodies with the right side of the body abutting a rock when aiming at prey shrimp, while righty individuals do the opposite (Takeuchi and Hori, 2008). These studies suggest that laterality in external morphology determines behavioral laterality and is ecologically significant.

In addition, behavioral laterality in the detour direction of Poeciliid fish on encountering an enemy was examined, and the results suggested that laterality seems to have a genetic background (e.g., Bisazza et al., 1998). In fact, in Girardinus falcatus, the tendency of left or right turning was shown to be correlated between parents and offspring (Vallortigara and Bisazza, 2002). These examples of behavioral laterality are thought to be caused by brain lateralization. Further studies are necessary to integrate laterality in behavior, external morphology, and the brain, to understand the asymmetry that is ubiquitous in nature and elucidate its inheritance patterns, genetic background, and ecological significance, all of which are poorly understood.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the members of the Laboratory of Animal Sociobiology, Graduate School of Science, Osaka City University, and the Laboratory of Animal Ecology, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, for their support with the breeding experiments and suggestions. We also thank the Field Science Education and Research Center, Kyoto University, for permission to collect O. latipes at the Kamigamo Experimental Forest Station, Kyoto, Japan. This work was financially supported in part by JSPS Research Fellowships for Young Scientists, Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)(21370010), Scientific Research on Priority Areas (14087203) and Biodiversity Research of the 21st Century Centers of Excellence Program (A14), and the Global Centre of Excellence Program (A06), from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan.

REFERENCES

1.

J Ballry (1999) The Penguin Dictionary of Plant Sciences, The Penguin Group, New York Google Scholar

2.

A Bisazza , LJ Rogers , G Vallortigara (1998) The origins of cerebral asymmetry: a review of evidence of behavioural and brain lateralization in fishes, reptiles and amphibians. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 22: 411–426 Google Scholar

3.

M Hori (1991) Feeding relationships among cichlid fishes in Lake Tanganyika: effects of intra- and inter-specific variations of feeding behavior on their coexistence. Ecol lnt Bull 19: 89–101 Google Scholar

4.

M Hori (1993) Frequency-dependent natural selection in the handedness of scale eating cichlid fish. Science 260: 216–219 Google Scholar

5.

M Hori , H Ochi , M Kohda (2007) Inheritance pattern of lateral dimorphism in two cichlids of the scale eater Perissodus microlepis and the herbivore Neolamprologus moorii in Lake Tanganyika. Zool Sci 24: 486–492 Google Scholar

6.

M Kohda , D Heg , Y Makino , T Takeyama , J Shibata , K Watanabe , et al. (2009) Living on the wedge: female control of paternity in a cooperatively polyandrous cichlid. Proc Roy Soc B 276: 4207–4214 Google Scholar

7.

KF Liem , DJ Stewart (1976) Evolution of scale-eating cichlid fishes of Lake Tanganyika: a generic revision with a description of a new species. Bull Mus Comp Zool 147: 319–350 Google Scholar

8.

K Matsubara , K Thidar , S Yoshio (2003) A gene block causing cross-incompatibility hidden in wild and cultivated rice. Genetics 165: 343–352 Google Scholar

9.

S Mboko , M Kohda , M Hori (1998) Asymmetry of mouth-opening of a small herbivorous cichlid fish Telmatochromis temporalis in Lake Tanganyika. Zool Sci 15: 405–408 Google Scholar

10.

M Nakae , K Sasaki (2001) A scale-eating triacanthodid, Macrorhamphosodes uradoi: prey fishes and mouth “handedness” (Tetradontiformes triacanthoidei). Ichthyol Res 2002: 7–14 Google Scholar

11.

M Nakajima , H Matsuda , M Hori (2004) Persistence and fluctuation of lateral dimorphism in fishes. Amer Nat 163: 692–698 Google Scholar

12.

M Nakajima , T Yodo , O Katano (2007) Righty fish are hooked on the right side of their mouths - observations from an angling experiment with largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides. Zool Sci 24: 855–859 Google Scholar

13.

K Ozato , Y Wakamatsu , K lnoue (1992) Medaka as a model of transgenic fish. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol 1: 346–354 Google Scholar

14.

A Rashid , PA Peterson (1992) The RSS system of unidirectional cross-incompatibility in maize: I. Genetics. J Hered 83: 130–134 Google Scholar

15.

S Seki , M Kohda , M Hori (2000) Asymmetry of mouth morph of a freshwater goby, Rhinogobius flumineus. Zool Sci 17:1321–1325 Google Scholar

16.

Y Takeuchi , M Hori (2008) Behavioural laterality in the shrimp-eating cichlid fish Neolamprologus fasciatus in Lake Tanganyika. Anim Behav 75: 1359–1366 Google Scholar

17.

G Vallortigara , A Bisazza (2002) How Ancient is Brain Lateralization? In “Comparative Vertebrate Lateralization” Ed by LJ Rogers , RJ Andrew , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 9–69 Google Scholar

18.

I Werneburg , ST Hertwig (2009) Head morphology of the ricefish, Oryzias latipes (Teleostei: Beloniformes). J Morphol 270: 1095– 1106 Google Scholar

19.

J Wittbrodt (2002) Medaka—a model organism from the far East. Nat Rev 3: 53–64 Google Scholar

20.

M Yasugi , M Hori (2011) Predominance of cross-predation between lateral morphs in a largemouth bass and a freshwater goby. Zool Sci 28: 869–874 Google Scholar
© 2012 Zoological Society of Japan
Hiroki Hata, Rieko Takahashi, Hiroshi Ashiwa, Satoshi Awata, Tomohiro Takeyama, Masanori Kohda, and Michio Hori "Inheritance Patterns of Lateral Dimorphism Examined through Breeding Experiments in Tanganyikan Cichlid (Julidochromis transcriptus) and Japanese Medaka (Oryzias latipes)," Zoological Science 29(1), 49-53, (1 January 2012). https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.29.49
Received: 13 June 2011; Accepted: 1 August 2011; Published: 1 January 2012
JOURNAL ARTICLE
5 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top