Translator Disclaimer
1 October 2015 Sexual Dimorphisms of Appendicular Musculoskeletal Morphology Related to Social Display in Cuban Anolis Lizards
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

In Anolis lizards, sexual dimorphism has been reported in morphological and ecological traits. Males show larger body size and longer limbs related to territorial combat and courtship display with the dewlap. Although functional-anatomical traits are closely related to locomotor behaviors, differences between sexes in musculoskeletal traits on limbs remain unclear. We explored the relationships among sexual dimorphisms in musculoskeletal morphology, habitat, and locomotor traits in Anolis lizards. Specifically, we examined appendicular musculoskeletal morphology in three species of Cuban Anolis by measuring muscle mass and lengths of moment arms. Through comparisons of crossing locomotion, we found that the runner species possessed larger extensors in hindlimbs, which are advantageous for running, whereas the masses of the humeral and femoral retractors were larger in climber species, allowing these lizards to hold up their bodies and occupy tree substrates. Comparisons between the sexes showed different trends among the three species. Males of A. porcatus, which inhabit narrow branches or leaves, had stronger elbow extensors that maintain the display posture. In contrast, males of A. sagrei, which occupy broad surfaces, did not show sexual differences that affected social display. Moreover, A. bartschi indicated sexual differences despite the absence of dewlapping behavior. Our findings suggest that both sexes show fundamentally similar relationships between muscular morphology and locomotor habits to adapt arboreal or terrestrial substrates, and yet sexual dimorphism in forelimb muscles may additionally affected by male specific display with the dewlap.

INTRODUCTION

Sexual dimorphism may arise because of sexual selection, in which reproductive strategies are different between male and female. In Anolis lizards, a model organism for the study of adaptive radiation and convergent evolution (Losos, 2009), sexual dimorphisms in body size, body shape, and social behavior have been reported in various species (Schoener, 1967; Fitch, 1976; Butler et al., 2000, 2007). Males tend to possess larger bodies and heads and longer limbs than females in most species (Butler et al., 2000, 2007). It has been suggested that these traits relate to territory defense by male animals against other males. Higher bite-force produced by a larger body and head is advantageous for male-male combat, while long limbs enable lizards to move in wider home-range (Herrel et al., 2007; Lailvaux and Irschick, 2007; Vanhooydonck et al., 2009). Anolis lizards are characterized by an extensible structure located on the throat, the dewlap. The dewlap is extended in social behaviors, such as ramping to male or courtship to female (Jenssen, 1977; Losos and Chu, 1998; Nicholson et al., 2007). During male displaying, lizards raise the head and anterior body by pushing up (head-bobbing) with repeated extension and contraction of the dewlap (Jenssen, 1977). Extension of the dewlap is produced by contracting the ceratohyoideus muscle, and accordingly this muscle is better developed in males than females (Font and Rome, 1990; O'Bryant and Wade, 1999; Johnson and Wade, 2010). This suggests that a behavior specific to males may produce sexual differences in the musculoskeletal system. However, whether the locomotive behavior is reflected by intersexual differences in limb muscles is unclear. Additionally, according to our observation, the forelimb posture for creating space to extend the dewlap during displaying is apparently different between terrestrial and arboreal species. Since musculoskeletal morphology of limbs are intimately related to locomotion or habitat use (Herrel et al., 2008; Anzai et al., 2014), behavioral divergence between male and female may be reflected by sexual dimorphism of appendicular muscles.

Here, we explore whether the sexual differences in appendicular musculoskeletal morphology are correlated with habitat use or locomotor style in three species of Anolis lizards. The three species are known to occur in different habitats and to show sexual dimorphisms in body size (Schettino, 1999). Anolis sagrei tends to be a terrestrial runner and can be found mainly on the ground or broad tree trunks (Collete, 1961; Schettino, 1999). This species shows a high frequency of rapid running with relatively long hindlimbs (Losos, 1990; Schettino, 1999). Anolis porcatus is a wide-ranging arboreal species whose habitats range from tree trunks to the narrow twigs near the top of canopy (Collette, 1961; Schettino, 1999). In these two species, the male has a larger body size and a larger dewlap than the female, as in most other species of Anolis lizards (Schoener, 1969; Schettino, 1999). Anolis bartschi is a runner species, which only occurs in caves or rocky substrates of limestone in western Cuba (Schettino, 1999). This species never displays with the dewlap, as this structure is exceptionally absent in both sexes (Schettino, 1999; Poe, 2004). Although males of A. sagrei and A. porcatus show different musculoskeletal morphologies, which are thought to represent adaptations to different locomotor styles or habitat uses (Anzai et al., 2014), whether females show similar adaptations remains unknown. In this study, we compare the musculoskeletal morphology of limbs among these three Anolis lizards with different habitats, locomotor styles, and dewlapping displays to test 1) whether there are intersexual differences in the appendicular musculature, and 2) whether sexual dimorphism of limb muscles is related to sexual dimorphism of social behaviors using the dewlap.

Table 1.

Details of Anolis lizards examined in this study. SVL is the length from snout to vent. Mass is individual weight just before dissection. The mean value and standard deviation of each measurement are indicated for each species. Habitat and locomotor classification follows Schettino (1999).

t01_438.gif

Fig. 1.

The appendicular musculature of Anolis lizards used in this study. (A) Lateral and (B) ven-tral side of trunk and left forelimb, (C) dorsal and (D) ventral side of left hindlimb are illustrated. Abbreviations: add = M. adductor femoris; amb = M. ambiens; bic = M. biceps brachii; bra = M. bra-chialis anticus; cfl = M. caudifemoralis longus; cobral = M. coracobrachialis longus; delc = M. clavodeltoideus; dels = M. scapulodeltoideus; ecr = M. extensor carpi radialis; ecu = M. extensor carpi ulnaris; edl = M. extensor digitorum longus (fore-limb); edl_h = M. extensor digitorum longus (hindlimb); fcr = M. flexor carpi radialis; fcu = M. flexor carpi ulnaris; fdl = M. flexor digitorum longus (forelimb); fdl_h = M. flexor digitorum longus (hindlimb); fte = M. flexor tibialis externus; fetiex = M. femorotibialis externus; fetiin = M. femorotibialis internus; ftil = M. flexor tibialis internus lateralis; ftim = M. flexor tibialis internus medialis; ftip = M. flexor tibialis internus posterior; gas = M. gastroc-nemius; ilfib = M. iliofibularis; it = M. iliotibialis; ld = M. latissimus dorsi; pecs = M. pectoralis superfi-cialis; pecp = M. pectoralis profundus; perb = M. peroneus brevis; perl = M. peroneus longus; pifi = M. puboischiofemoralis internus; pit = M. pubois-chiotibialis; pt = M. pubotibialis; supco = M. supra-coracoideus; ta = M. tibialis anterior; tri = M. triceps complex. The deep muscles as M. coraco-brachialis brevis (cobrab), M. iliofemoralis (ilfem), M. puboischiofemoralis externus (pife), M. subco-racoscapularis coracoid portion (subc) and sub-scapular portion (subs) are not illustrated.

f01_438.jpg

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Specimens

In September 2010 and September 2011, we captured a total of 22 adult specimens of three species of Anolis lizards by hand or noose in Cuba (Table 1). All animals were anesthetized and fixed in 100% ethanol, and stored in 70% ethanol. Since dry muscles are easily frayed and difficult to isolate, the samples were soaked in 30% ethanol overnight before dissection. The fore- and hindlimbs were dissected, and each muscle was isolated under a microscope (S240; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Nineteen muscles from forelimbs related to rotation of each joint and 22 muscles from hindlimbs were chosen for measurement (Zaaf et al., 1999; Herrel et al., 2008; Russell and Bauer, 2008; Anzai et al., 2014). These musculatures are illustrated in Fig. 1.

Measurements

Two parameters were measured in each muscle and compared. First, muscle mass was measured as an index of muscular force. Each isolated muscle was dried by blotting and weighed to the nearest 0.01 mg using a Shimadzu balance (AUW-220D; Kyoto, Japan). The length of each muscle moment arm was measured as a second trait. The length was defined as the distance from the center of rotation in each joint to the point of the muscle insertion, which theoretically represents the maximum moment arm (An et al., 1984; Fujiwara et al., 2011). Given the trade-off between torque and excursion, muscles with longer moment arms exert larger torque and muscles with shorter moment arms produce grater excursion. Lengths were measured using calipers to the nearest 0.05 mm.

Fig. 2.

Boxplots showing the normalized values for the forelimb muscles mass. The vertical axis indicates the residuals from ln-transformed muscle mass regressed against ln-total mass.

f02_438.jpg

Fig. 3.

Boxplots showing normalized values for hindlimb muscles mass.

f03_438.jpg

Statistical analyses

To remove the effect of body size among different growth stages and/or species, all the muscle measurements were corrected for size. For muscle mass, residuals from the regression of each ln-transformed muscle mass value against the ln-transformed total body mass were used. For the moment arm, the ratio of each measurement to the length of limb bone on which the muscle inserts was calculated. To analyze whether locomotion, display, and sex affect musculoskeletal traits, we used two tests of two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). One test took locomotion (terrestrial runner or arboreal climber) and sex as crossed factors and other one used sexual display with dewlap (existence or absence) and sex as crossed factors. All statistical analyses were performed using R (version 2.15.0, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) and P < 0.05 was the criterion for statistical significance.

Fig. 4.

Boxplots showing the normalized values for the forelimb muscles moment arm. The vertical axis indicates the ratios of the value to length of limb bone that the muscle inserts.

f04_438.jpg

RESULTS

The results of the comparison of normalized muscle mass are presented in Figs. 2 and 3, and that of the moment arm is shown in Figs. 4 and 5. The all row measurements of muscle mass are shown in  Supplementary Table S1 (10.2108.zsj.32.438.s1.pdf), and that of the moment arm is shown in  Supplementary Table S2 online (10.2108.zsj.32.438.s1.pdf). The results of two tests of two-way ANOVA are shown in Table 2, and all of the p-value are presented in  Supplementary Table S3 online (10.2108.zsj.32.438.s1.pdf).

In analyses between different locomotion types, climber species possessed significantly larger mass of M. coracobrachialis longus, M. clavodeltoideus, M. latissimus dorsi, M. pectoralis superficialis, M. brachialis anticus, M. caudifemoralis longus and M. iliofibularis, whereas runner species possessed larger mass of M. flexor tibialis internus lateralis, M. flexor tibialis internus medialis, M. iliotibialis, M. ambiens, M. femorotibialis externus, M. femorotibialis internus, M. peroneus brevis, M. gastrocnemius, and M. peroneus longus. Significant sexual differences in muscle mass were observed in M. triceps, M. flexor tibialis internus medialis, and M. femorotibialis externus and internus. The interaction of two factors was shown only in M. caudifemoralis longus. In terms of moment arm, runner species exhibited longer values in M. pectoralis, M. biceps brachii and M. brachialis anticus, whereas climber species were showed longer moment arms in M. flexor digitorum longus, M. puboischiofemoralis externus, M. iliofemoralis and M. caudifemoralis longus. Intersexual differences were found in M. supracoracoideus, M. latissimus dorsi, M. biceps brachii, M. triceps, M. flexor digitorum longus, M. extensor digitorum longus and M. iliofiblaris. In addition, M. latissimus dorsi, M. flexor carpi ulnaris, M. extensor carpi ulnaris, M. flexor digitorum longus, M. iliotibialis and M. peroneus brevis showed significant interactions between the two factors, sex and locomotion.

Fig. 5.

Boxplots showing the normalized values for the hindlimb muscles moment arm. Result of four knee extensors (M. iliotibialis, M. ambiens, M. femorotibialis externus, M. femorotibialis internus) are illustrated collectively in “Knee ext”, as these muscles insert to a common tendon.

f05_438.jpg

Table 2.

Results of two test of two-way ANOVA. Sex, locomotion pattern, existence of display were used as crossed factors. Abbreviations: dis = existence of display; loc = locomotion; int = interaction of two crossed factors. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.

t02_438.gif

In two-way ANOVA analyses using existence of dewlapping display and sex as factors, species with dewlap (A. sagrei and A. porcatus) possessed larger mass of M. pectoralis profundus, M. coracobrachialis longus, M. subcoracoscapularis scapular portion and coracoid portion, M. scapulodeltoideus, M. latissimus dorsi, M. pectoralis superficialis, M. biceps brachii, M. triceps, M. flexor carpi ulnaris, M. caudifemoralis longus, M. flexor tibialis externus and M. tibialis anterior, whereas species without dewlap (A. bartschi) was equipped larger mass of M. ambiens, M. femorotibialis externus and internus. Sexual differences of muscle mass were shown in M. biceps brachii, M. triceps, and M. femorotibialis externus and internus. With respect to moment arm, significantly longer of M. supracoracoideus was shown in species without dewlap, while longer arm of M. adductor femoris, M. iliofemoralis, M. puboischiotibialis, M. flexor tibialis externus and M. flexor tibialis internus posterior were observed in species with dewlap. Significant sexual differences of moment arm were observed in M. supracoracoideus, M. triceps, M. flexor digitorum longus, M. extensor digitorum longus and M. iliofiblaris. No interaction between two factors was found in terms of muscle mass, but the moment arm of M. flexor digitorum longus showed a significant interaction term.

DISCUSSION

Differences among locomotion type

Although some studies indicated the relationship among appendicular musculoskeletal traits and locomotor behavior or habitat use in lizards, these studies analyzed only males, to exclude the effects of sexual difference (Zaaf et al., 1999; Vanhooydonck et al., 2006; Herrel et al., 2008; Anzai et al., 2014). Our data suggest that similar relationships between morphology and ecological traits in females may exist. In terms of muscle mass, the runner species A. sagrei and A. bartschi were equipped with well-developed extensor muscles in knee and ankle joints in both male and female (Fig. 3). Their large hindlimb extensors are suited for powerful kicking off from the ground or broad surfaces when running (Reilly, 1995, 1998; Herrel et al., 2008). Also, M. flexor tibialis internus lateralis and M. flexor tibialis internus medialis were expanded in runner species. Because these two muscles are apparently used by lizards when running on the ground through femoral adduction (Fieler and Jayne, 1998; Anzai et al., 2014), larger muscles are suited for rapid locomotion by both sexes in running species. In contrast, heavier retractor muscles in shoulder and hip joints and flexor muscles in the elbow were observed in the arboreal climber species, A. porcatus (Figs. 2 and 3). Since vertical climbing by lizards requires tension by the front legs to avoid backwards tumbling when their hind legs push for propulsion and countering gravity (Zaaf et al., 1999), enlarged elbow flexor muscles and proximal limb retractor muscles adapt lizards to scansorial locomotion in arboreal habitats. With regard to moment arm, A. porcatus possessed shorter moment arms in forelimb muscles (M. pectoralis, M. biceps brachii and M. brachialis anticus) and possessed longer moment arms in hindlimb muscles (M. puboischiofemoralis externus, M. iliofemoralis and M. caudifemoralis longus) than the two runner species (Figs. 4 and 5). A shorter moment arm provides a wider excursion angle in joints, thereby facilitating limb movement especially on narrow arboreal substrates (Peterson, 1973; Anzai et al., 2014). The greater flexibility of the elbow joint may be effective for stabilization in complex arboreal environments (Foster and Higham, 2012). In contrast, it is thought that larger torque is required for the hip joint to sustain the body when climbing (Zaaf et al., 1999). Although musculoskeletal traits of limbs in these three species showed different adaptive patterns in a habitat-dependent manner, the male and female tend to be equipped with similar muscular traits related to the locomotor style. This suggests that limb structures of males and females are similarly affected by ecological traits, as both males and females in each species reside in the same habitats (Schettino, 1999).

However, in M. femorotibialis externus and internus, the female in all three species showed significant larger muscle mass than the male (Fig. 3). Male anoles tend to keep a wider territorial home range and to be more active than the female (Vanhooydonck et al., 2005; Johnson et al., 2010), and thus the male is predicted to exhibit morphological traits that are more adaptive for running or jumping, such as long hindlimb and highly developed extensor muscles. Although it is known that males are equipped with a longer hindlimb than females in some Anolis species (Butler et al., 2007), unexpectedly our data showed that females are equipped with larger knee extensors than males. Furthermore, the other two extensor muscles on the knee joint (M. iliotibialis and M. ambiens) showed no sexual differences and no interaction between sex and locomotion type in these muscles (Table 2). It means that the four muscles considered as “knee extensors” may have different roles. Although all four muscles are inserted through the same tendon on the head of the tibia, M. iliotibialis and M ambiens arise from aponeuroses from the pelvic bone and extend along the femur superficially, whereas M. femorotibialis externus and M. femorotibialis internus arise from femoral shaft and extend along the femur profoundly. Although several studies have measured electromyography in the hindlimbs of lizards (Reilly, 1995, 1998; Foster and Higham, 2014), no study has analyzed both the superficial knee extensor muscles and the profound muscles. Thus, these “knee extensor” muscles may not only extend knee joint, but also may be related to aspects of locomotion that differ in male and female.

Interspecies and sexual differences among existence/non- of display with dewlap

In forelimb, nearly half of the muscles were enlarged in species with dewlap (A. sagrei and A. porcatus) compared to A. bartschi, which lacks a dewlap. When males of these two species are displaying by extension of the dewlap, they raise their head and lift up their anterior body by their arms. Hence large forelimb muscles in two species may be related to sexual display. However, no sexual differences in mass of forelimb muscles were observed in the three species, with the exception of M. biceps brachii and M. triceps. The lighter forelimb muscles in A. bartschi are considered to be a specialization for cave habitats as both males and females show similar morphologies. In addition, knee extensors (M. ambiens, M. femorotibialis externus and internus) were enlarged in A. bartshci, thus this species may invest in locomotor behavior to maintain wider territory instead of sexual display behavior.

Elbow extensor muscle, M. triceps, showed statistical sexual differences in both muscle mass (Fig. 2; P < 0.05 with locomotion and P < 0.01 with display by two-way ANOVA) and moment arm (Fig. 4; P < 0.05 with locomotion and P < 0.01 with display); male A. porcatus in particular showed larger values than female in the boxplots. Anolisporcatus tends to keep its arms near the body as this species lives mainly in arboreal narrow habitats and hence when the male performs displaying behavior it needs to extend the elbow in order to raise the head and body. In contrast, A. sagrei mainly occurs on broad surfaces such as tree trunks or the ground (Schettino, 1999), they spread their arms widely to increase the stride (Foster and Higham, 2012). Thus, when male A. sagrei are displaying with the dewlap, they appear to raise the head and lift the anterior body by adducting their arms to make space for an expanding dewlap. However, no significant sexual differences were shown in humeral adductor muscles, M. pectoralis profundus, M. coracobrachialis longus and brevis. Also no statistical significance of interaction between sex and locomotion or display was indicated in most muscles (Table 2). Although differences in posture when lizards are displaying caused by differences in habitat may lead to sexual dimorphisms, dewlap behavior does not affect limb muscles, at least in A. sagrei.

However A. bartschi, which does not display with a dewlap, also showed sexual dimorphisms in the moment arm of elbow flexor muscles (Fig. 4), nonetheless non-significant by two-way ANOVA. There could be two explanations why this sexual dimorphism exists. First, the male can produce a larger torque than the female. Second, the female is equipped with larger excursion than the male in elbow flexion. According to Schettino (1999), no differences in ecological habits have been found between males and females in A. bartschi, but few ecological studies have been conducted on this species. Although we could not address further why the sexual difference is present, because of the lack of relevant ecological and behavioral data about A. bartschi, their sexual differences of body size suggest that male-male combat occurs in this species (Table 1; Lailvaux and Irschick, 2007; Thomas et al., 2009). A similar sexual difference in muscular traits of elbow flexion has been reported in Japanese toad (Oka et al., 1984). Male Bufo japonicusare equipped with powerful flexor muscles in the elbow, which relates to clasping behavior to hold females with their forelimbs during the breeding season (Oka et al., 1984). A larger torque of male A. bartschi may be related to holding the female during mating, although no extensive observation of mating behavior has been conducted in this species. Meanwhile, female A. bartschi bears enormous eggs compared to those of other Anolis lizards, and additionally lays eggs in crevasses, which differs from most Anolis species which oviposit in the soil (Schettino, 1999). These unique reproductive traits may affect the female-specific shorter moment arm on the elbow joint that we describe above. However, we need more detailed observations and ecological researches to discuss the significance of our data with respect to sexual differences in A. bartschi. In conclusion, we describe evident sexual dimorphisms in the appendicular musculature of three species of Anolis lizards and the possibility that these dimorphisms are affected by various sexual displays using the dewlap and ecological habitats.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to Masakado Kawata who organized a cooperative research project on Anolis lizards with The University of Havana, and allowed us to use the specimens used in this study. We are grateful to Lazaro Echenique-Diaz and Hiroshi Akashi for helping us collect specimens. Special thanks to Luis M. Diaz for providing helpful information about A. bartschi. We also thank Shin-ichi Fujiwara, Daisuke Koyabu, and Mugino Kubo for helpful advice. Collection and exportation permits were provided by the Centro de Inspección y Contról Ambiental (CICA) of the Agencia de Medio Ambiente de Cuba (Permit No. 2012019).

REFERENCES

  1. KN An , K Takahashi , TP Harrigan , EY Chao ( 1984) Determination of muscle orientations and moment arms. J Biomech Eng-T ASME 106: 280–282 Google Scholar

  2. W Anzai , A Omura , AC Diaz , M Kawata , H Endo ( 2014) Functional morphology and comparative anatomy of appendicular musculature in Cuban Anolis lizards with different locomotor habits. Zool Sci 31: 454–463 Google Scholar

  3. MA Butler , TW Schoener , JB Losos ( 2000) The relationship between sexual size dimorphism and habitat use in Greater Antillean Anolis lizards. Evolution 54: 259–272 Google Scholar

  4. MA Butler , SA Sawyer , JB Losos ( 2007) Sexual dimorphism and adaptive radiation in Anolis lizards. Nature 447: 202–205 Google Scholar

  5. BB Collette ( 1961) Correlations between ecology and morphology in anoline lizards from Havana, Cuba, and Southern Florida. Bull Mus Comp Zool 125: 135–162 Google Scholar

  6. C Fieler , BC Jayne ( 1998) Effects of speed on the hindlimb kinematicsof the lizard Dipsosaurus dorsalis. J Exp Biol 201: 609–622 Google Scholar

  7. HS Fitch ( 1976) Sexual size differences in the mainland anoles. Occas Pap Mus Nat His (Lawrence) 21: 1–21 Google Scholar

  8. E Font , LC Rome ( 1990) Functional morphology of dewlap extension in the lizard Anolis equestris (Iguanidae). J Morphol 206: 245–258 Google Scholar

  9. KL Foster , TE Higham ( 2012) How forelimb and hindlimb function changes with incline and perch diameter in the green anole, Anolis carolinensis. J Exp Biol 215: 2288–2300 Google Scholar

  10. KL Foster , TE Higham ( 2014) Context-dependent changes in motor control and kinematics during locomotion: modulation and decoupling. Proc Roy Soc B 281: 20133331 Google Scholar

  11. S Fujiwara , H Endo , JR Hutchinson ( 2011) Topsy-turvy locomotion: biomechanical specializations of the elbow in suspended quadrupeds reflect inverted gravitational constraints. J Anat 219: 176–191 Google Scholar

  12. A Herrel , LD Mcbrayer , PM Larson ( 2007) Functional basis for sexual differences in bite force in the lizard Anolis carolinensis. Biol J Linn Soc 91: 111–119 Google Scholar

  13. A Herrel , B Vanhooydonck , J Porck , J Irschick ( 2008) Anatomical basis of differences in locomotor behavior in Anolis lizards: A comparison between two ecomorphs. Bull Mus Comp Zool 159: 213–238 Google Scholar

  14. TA Jenssen ( 1977) Evolution of anoline lizard display behavior. Integr Comp Biol 17: 203–215 Google Scholar

  15. MA Johnson , J Wade ( 2010) Behavioural display systems across nine Anolis lizard species: sexual dimorphisms in structure and function. Proc R Soc B 277: 1711–1719 Google Scholar

  16. MA Johnson , LJ Revell , JB Losos ( 2010) Behavioral convergence and adaptive radiation: effects of habitat use on territorial behavior in Anolis lizards. Evolution 64: 1151–1159 Google Scholar

  17. SP Lailvaux , DJ Irschick ( 2007) The evolution of performance-based male fighting ability in Caribbean Anolis lizards. Am Nat 170: 573–586 Google Scholar

  18. JB Losos ( 1990) The evolution of form and function: Morphology and locomotor performance in West Indian Anolis lizards. Evolution 44: 1189–1203 Google Scholar

  19. JB Losos ( 2009) Ecology and adaptive radiation of anoles: Lizards in an Evolutionary Tree. University of California Press, London Google Scholar

  20. JB Losos , LR Chu ( 1998) Examination of factors potentially affecting dewlap size in Caribbean anoles. Copeia 2: 430–438 Google Scholar

  21. KE Nicholson , LJ Harmon , JB Losos (2007) Evolution of Anolislizard dewlap diversity. PloS One 2: e274 Google Scholar

  22. EL O'Bryant , J Wade ( 1999) Sexual dimorphisms in a neuromuscularsystem regulating courtship in the green anole lizard: Effects of season and androgen treatment. J Neurobiol 40: 202–213 Google Scholar

  23. Y Oka , R Ohtani , M Satou , K Ueda ( 1984) Sexually dimorphic muscles in the forelimb of the Japanese toad, Bufo japonicus. J Morphol 308: 297–308 Google Scholar

  24. JA Peterson ( 1973) Adaptation for arboreal locomotion in the shoulder region of lizards. Ph. D. Thesis, University of Chicago Google Scholar

  25. S Poe ( 2004) Phylogeny of anoles. Herpetol Monogr 18: 37–89 Google Scholar

  26. SM Reilly ( 1995) Quantitative electromyography and muscle function of the hind limb during quadrupedal running in the lizard Sceloporus clarki. Zoology 98: 263–277 Google Scholar

  27. SM Reilly ( 1998) Sprawling locomotion in the lizard Sceloporus clarkii: speed modulation of motor patterns in a walking trot. Brain Behav Evol 52: 126–138 Google Scholar

  28. AP Russell , A Bauer ( 2008) The appendicular locomotor apparatus of Sphenodon and normal-limbed squamates. In “Biology of the Reptilia, Vol 21, Morphology I” Ed by C Gans , AS Gaunt , K Adler , Society for the study of Amphibians and Reptiles, Salt Lake City, pp 1–466 Google Scholar

  29. L Schettino ( 1999) The Iguanid Lizards of Cuba. University Press of Florida, Gainesville Google Scholar

  30. TW Schoener ( 1967) The ecological significance of sexual dimorphism in size in the lizard Anolis conspersus. Science 155: 474–477 Google Scholar

  31. TW Schoener ( 1969) Size patterns in West Indian Anolis lizards: I. Size and species diversity. Syst Zool 18: 386–401 Google Scholar

  32. GH Thomas , S Meiri , AB Phillimore ( 2009) Body size diversification in Anolis: novel environment and island effects. Evolution 63: 2017–2030 Google Scholar

  33. B Vanhooydonck , A Herrel , R Van Damme , JJ Meyers , JJ Irschick ( 2005) The relationship between dewlap size and performance changes with age and sex in a Green Anole (Anolis carolinensis)lizard population. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59: 157–165 Google Scholar

  34. B Vanhooydonck , A Herrel , R Van Damme , DJ Irschick ( 2006) The quick and the fast: the evolution of acceleration capacity in Anolis lizards. Evolution 60: 2137–2147 Google Scholar

  35. B Vanhooydonck , A Herrel , JJ Meyers , DJ Irschick ( 2009) What determines dewlap diversity in Anolis lizards? An among-island comparison. J Evolution Biol 22: 293–305 Google Scholar

  36. A Zaaf , A Herrel , P Aerts , F De Vree ( 1999) Morphology and morphometrics of the appendicular musculature in geckoes with different locomotor habits (Lepidosauria). Zoomorphology 119: 9–22 Google Scholar

© 2015 Zoological Society of Japan
Wataru Anzai, Antonio Cádiz, and Hideki Endo "Sexual Dimorphisms of Appendicular Musculoskeletal Morphology Related to Social Display in Cuban Anolis Lizards," Zoological Science 32(5), 438-446, (1 October 2015). https://doi.org/10.2108/zs150027
Received: 26 February 2015; Accepted: 1 July 2015; Published: 1 October 2015
JOURNAL ARTICLE
9 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top