Translator Disclaimer
1 January 2018 Strong Heterogeneity in Advances in Cryopreservation Techniques in the Mammalian Orders
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Between 1970 and 2012, vertebrate abundance has declined by 58% with an average annual decline of 2%, calling for serious action to prevent a mass extinction and an irreversible loss of biodiversity. Cryobanks and cryopreservation have the potential to assist and improve ex situ and in situ conservation strategies by storing valuable genetic material. A great deal of studies concerning cryopreservation have been performed within the class Mammalia, although no systematic overview has previously been presented. The objective of this study is therefore to evaluate the status, pattern and future of cryopreservation within Mammalia. A strong disproportional distribution of studies in examined orders is displayed. For the majority of examined orders less than 10% of species has been examined. However, the cryopreservation of germplasm has in several cases been successful and resulted in successful applications of assisted reproductive techniques (ARTs). Various obstacles are associated with the development of cryopreservation protocols, and among them the most prominent is interspecific differences in cryotolerance. Extrapolation of protocols in closely related species is considered the most applicable procedure, and a future supplement to overcome this problem is the examination and comparison of cryobiological traits. Successful protocols have been developed for the vast majority of domesticated mammals, which gives incentive for the further extrapolation of protocols in threatened species.

INTRODUCTION

Biodiversity on earth is rapidly declining. The current rate of species extinction is unprecedented in human history and is already consistent with a mass extinction episode unmatched in the last 65 million years (Ceballos et al., 2015). Between 1970 and 2012, vertebrate abundance has declined by 58% with an average annual decline of 2% (WWF, 2016). The most common threat to declining populations is habitat loss and degradation (Rondinini et al., 2011; Heinrichs et al., 2016). This is evident for mammals living in terrestrial and freshwater habitats. However, the most common threat to marine mammals is overexploitation (WWF, 2016). Declines in population size reduce genetic diversity and increase the probability of inbreeding, leading to higher risk of extinction due to loss of adaptability and inbreeding depression (Wright et al., 2008; Hedrick and Garcia-Dorado, 2016). The aforementioned threats are consequences of anthropogenic activity and we are therefore already finding ourselves in the middle of the Anthropocene epoch (Waters et al., 2016).

Due to the rapid loss of mammalian species, there is a desperate need for conservation strategies. The ideal solution is provided by in situ conservation, e.g., habitat preservation, however predictions of future exploitation of land make this strategy seemingly impossible (WWF, 2016). A less favorable approach is ex situ conservation, e.g., captive breeding programs. However, ex situ conservation should primarily be used as a complement to in situ conservation (Kasso and Balakrishnan, 2013). As an interface between these strategies, cryopreservation of biological material offers the opportunity to preserve endangered animals (Holt and Pickard, 1999). By storing cryopreserved gametes, embryos, or somatic cells, genetic diversity from existing wild or captive populations can be preserved (Johnston and Lacy, 1995; Leon-Quinto et al., 2009). To accommodate this, genome resource bank initiatives such as the Frozen Ark Consortium ( https://www.frozenark.org) and Frozen Zoo ( http://institute.sandiegozoo.org/resources/frozen-zoo) Contribute to the preservation of genetic material. Recovery of genetic material requires different extraction methods, depending on which material is to be preserved. These include, but are not limited to, electroejaculation (EE), manual stimulation (MS) or use of an artificial vagina (AV) for sperm, and post-mortem recovery of reproductive organs, e.g., epididymis or ovaries, for sperm or oocyte collection. Furthermore, optimal freezing methods and cryomedia are necessary. The most commonly applied freezing method is storage of the material in liquid nitrogen at -196°C (Prieto et al., 2014). Chilling and freezing procedures often face problems with cold-shock stress, inflicting injuries and low quality rates in cryopreservation. To avoid this, the procedure often involves diluting the material in different media before chilling or freezing. The so-called extenders, such as egg yolk and antibiotics, are added to enrich and increase quality of the material. Cryoprotectants, such as glycerol, non-ionic sucrose, or lipoproteins, are added to prevent osmotic stress and intracellular ice formation (Fickel et al., 2007).

The susceptibility of biological material to injury during cryopreservation shows inter-specific differences, and optimal methods differ even between species that belong to the same phylogenetic group, e.g., order (Thurston et al., 2002). This requires examination of cryopreservation in virtually all (particularly endangered and unique) species to ensure the development of successful assisted reproductive techniques (ART). Aspects concerning cryopreservation of biological material have previously been outlined (Goodrowe et al., 2000; Mocé and Vicente, 2009; Rodger et al., 2009; Silva et al., 2016). However, a broad overview of Mammalia as a whole is lacking. The objective of this study is therefore to evaluate the status, pattern, and future of cryopreservation within the class Mammalia.

THE STATUS OF CRYOPRESERVATION WITHIN MAMMALIA

In this review, the state of the art and the application of cryopreservation techniques in Mammalian species is presented. Motility has been emphasized for characterization of sperm quality and the development rate for characterization of embryo quality due to the prevalence of these parameters. Furthermore, every attempted use of ARTs has been included, regardless of success. Emphasis has been put on the attempt to present the progress of cryopreservation within each order by including all examined species. However, to represent the current progress of cryotechniques, few well-examined species have been thoroughly described. This review reserves its position on the inclusion of every cryopreservation study conducted to date.

EMERGING PATTERNS OF CRYOPRESERVATION WITHIN MAMMALIA

A great deal of studies has been performed on species within Mammalia and has in several cases been successful and resulted in the successful application of ARTs (Table 1). Considering the vast number of species within this class, at least 2.7% of species has been examined, however further research is critically needed. For the majority of examined orders less than 10% of species has been examined, where some species have been subject to intense study and others have been subject to few. Further development of cryopreservation techniques could benefit from increased sharing of knowledge between researchers. This review serves as an overview of the class and as a preliminary foundation for the development of increased sharing of knowledge.

The most intensively examined species primarily consist of domesticated and captive wild animals. These protocols can be extrapolated to field conditions for wild animals to increase the genetic diversity of the current reserves of cryopreserved material within each species. This has already been accomplished in African elephant (Loxodonta Africana) (Hildebrandt et al., 2012) and Japanese black bear (Ursus thibetanus japanicus) (Okano et al., 2006). Furthermore, a large proportion of examined species consists of non-threatened animals. Extrapolation of protocols from non-threatened to threatened species is another promising procedure, which have already been observed from common squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus) to black-headed squirrel monkey (Saimiri vanzolinii) (Oliveira et al., 2016) and generic grey wolf (Canis lupus) to Mexican grey wolf (Canis lupus baileyi) (Zindl et al., 2006).

Extraction methods

Electroejaculation is the most prevalent extraction method of mammalian sperm, although this method has been observed to yield a lower sperm quality compared to other extraction methods. This has been observed in several species including domestic stallions (Equus caballus) (Cary et al., 2004) and grey wolf (Christensen et al., 2011). MS and AV in wild species require intensive animal training and conditioning, which has been successfully performed on captive whales (Robeck et al., 2010; Montano et al., 2012), monkeys (Takasu et al., 2016), and zebra (Crump and Crump, 1994). However, MS leads to other complications as seen in Asian elephant (Elephas maximus) where the mix of seminal plasma components can vary with each ejaculate and the risk of urine contamination is increased (Imrat et al., 2012). Due to poor results with the application of AV, MS, and EE in rhinos, a post-coital extraction method was applied as it includes the natural ejaculation of sperm. The small fluid volumes emitted by MS or EE may not consist of the appropriate mixture of seminal fluids needed to maintain sperm longevity and, ultimately, fertility (O'Brien and Roth, 2000b).

Another less invasive extraction method than EE is urethral catheterization which yielded superior motility figures for fresh sperm compared to EE in African lion (Panthera leo) (Lueders et al., 2012; Fernandez-Gonzales et al., 2015). The ejaculate volume was low, yet sperm motility was higher than sperm collected by EE and from cauda epididymes (Lueders et al., 2012). Therefore, urethral catheterization and post-coital extraction should be considered as alternative extraction methods in the future. In some species, female germplasm is extracted following euthanasia reducing the effective population size (Asada et al., 2000; Fujihira et al., 2006). However, oocytes can be collected surgically from live animals by follicular aspiration as seen in cynomolgus macaque (Macaca fascicularis) (Curnow et al., 2002) and vervet monkey (Clorocebus aethiops) (Sparman et al., 2007).

When extracting germplasm from both males and females, reproduction seasonality should be taken into account. Understanding the reproductive physiology of animals can contribute to optimizing extraction protocols (Santos et al., 2015). For example, tufted deer (Elaphodus cephalophus) sperm traits were observed to peak during autumn (Panyaboriban et al., 2016) and North American bison (Bison bison) sperm motility peaked during late summer and autumn (Krishnakumar et al., 2011). A similar tendency was indicated in Grant's zebra (Equus quagga burchelli), but was absent in the related Grevy's zebra (Equus grevyi) (Crump and Crump, 1994). Knowledge of the reproductive biology of each individual species is needed to enable optimal extraction.

Freezing methods

The most frequently applied freezing method of the examined species is the conventional slow-freezing method, although other freezing methods have shown promising results. An alternative freezing method is vitrification, which has shown superior results in cryopreservation of testicular tissue from house mouse (Yokonishi et al., 2014) and blastocysts from house mouse (Yeoman et al., 2001). Vitrification offers the advantages of low cost, ease of operation, and the avoidance of extracellular ice formation (Rall and Fahy, 1985; Yeoman et al., 2001; Liu et al., 2009; Comizzoli et al., 2012). Several improvements to the vitrification method have been developed, to more efficiently vitrify biological material. These consist of ultra-rapid vitrification methods using smaller volumes and higher freezing rates, such as the cryotop method (Kuwayama, 2007) used for Canis lupus baileyi (Czarny et al., 2009) and Sus scrofa domesticus (Sakagami et al., 2010) oocytes. Freeze-drying is another alternative freezing method. Freezing of sperm by both slow-freezing and freeze-drying showed no significant difference in fertilization rates in rhesus macaque (Sánchez-Partida et al., 2008) and golden hamster (Muneto and Horiuchi, 2011). However, the freeze-drying method is convenient due as it does not require storage in liquid nitrogen, which makes it less expensive and well suited for long-term preservation combined with easier shipping at ambient temperature (Ward et al., 2003; Sánchez-Partida et al., 2008). Furthermore, the estimation of blastocyst development was calculated to have no significant decrease after fertilization with freeze-dried sperm kept at -80°C for 100 years (Kawase et al., 2005). However, a downside of freeze-drying sperm is the immotility after rehydration, which excludes most ARTs, except intra cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) (Sánchez-Partida et al., 2008; Muneto and Horiuchi, 2011).

An alternative to the conventional protocols for germplasm is the freezing of whole bodies. In Ogonuki et al. (2006), the successful fertilization of oocytes using ICSI was conducted with 15 year old sperm extracted from frozen whole bodies of house mouse kept at -20°C. This investigation provides an incentive for further experiments using frozen whole bodies, which could simplify future cryopreservation methods. This may also enable de-extinction, as ARTs could be performed using animals preserved in permafrost (Ogonuki et al., 2006).

Interspecific and intraspecific differences

The development of universal cryopreservation protocols is problematic as cryotolerance appears variate between species (Holt, 2000; Thurston et al., 2002). Interspecific variation was observed in closely related species after the application of identical cryopreservation protocols in rhinos (Portas et al., 2009) and squirrel monkeys (Oliveira et al., 2016). Moreover, sperm quality and cryotolerance have been observed to vary among individuals of the same species, which might relate to the genotype of the individual (Thurston et al., 2002; Gagliardi et al., 2008; Portas et al., 2009). This hypothesis is supported by the observation that cryotolerance did not differ within individual ejaculates from the same rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta) (Gagliardi et al., 2008). Intraspecific sperm quality and cryotolerance have been found in Asian elephant. (Thongtip et al., 2004; Imrat et al., 2012) and white rhino (Ceratotherium simum) (Portas et al., 2009). Intraspecific differences are especially problematic, because not only must cryopreservation protocols be developed for the specific species, but it must also be tailored to suit the individual. If this is not taken into consideration, there is a possibility that cryopreservation protocols favor a specific genotype within each species. This is an unfavorable direction as it conflicts with the overall aim of cryobanking, which is to preserve as much genetic diversity as possible (Imrat et al., 2012).

Transport and disease transmission risks

Cryobanking has demonstrated useful applications in ex situ conservation programs. The transport of frozen material is a less comprehensive procedure compared to the transport of live animals (Hermes et al., 2013; Saragusty et al., 2015). The application of frozen material in ex situ conservation programs was investigated in African elephant (Hildebrandt et al., 2012; Hermes et al., 2013). Cryopreserved sperm from wild African elephants were shipped from South Africa to Europe, where artificial insemination was performed on a captive female with the purpose of introducing new genes to the captive population. One pregnancy was successfully established (Hermes et al., 2013) and a later study reports the birth of two calves and one more pregnancy (Saragusty et al., 2015). These results are of great importance, as transport-induced stress in elephants increases the risk of mortality (Clubb et al., 2008). Furthermore, frozen epididymis and testis from house mouse (Mus musculus) were successfully shipped from the United Kingdom to Japan (Ogonuki et al., 2006). These successful endeavors are unique, because health legislation restricts the transport of genetic material across borders (Hermes et al., 2013; Saragusty et al., 2015). For the purpose of transportation, donors have to be investigated for a variety of pathogens, which excludes a lot of already cryopreserved material. In the successful transport of African elephant sperm, it was therefore important that a thorough clinical examination was performed on each donor, and blood samples were collected for disease screening at the time of collection (Hermes et al., 2013). Despite these efforts, cryopreservation protocols of male and female germplasm are not performed under sterile conditions (Bielanski et al., 2003). Furthermore, liquid nitrogen is not sterile as pathogenic organisms can be conserved on immersion. During transportation, these pathogenic organisms may be released back into the environment as nitrogen vapor cools dry shippers (Grout and Morris, 2009). These precautions should be considered not only during transportation, but also at storage sites. Nitrogen vapor cools programmable freezers, which can release dormant pathogens to the surroundings (Grout and Morris, 2009) and contaminate samples, which are being prepared for cryopreservation or thawing. A problem arises when contaminated material is used in ARTs and thereby transferred to a live animal. However, it has been concluded that no direct evidence of disease transmission by transferred cryopreserved animal embryos have been seen in over 25 years (Bielanski, 2012).

Implementation of cryopreservation

Cryobanking can work as a supporting tool for ex situ and in situ conservation programs (Leon-Quinto et al., 2009). However, which species should be prioritized is a matter for continuing discussion. It can reasonably be argued that focus should be on Critically Endangered (CR) listed species, as they might be on the brink of extinction. Cryopreservation of these species could work as a supplement to in situ conservation with the purpose of reversing the loss of heterozygosity in susceptible populations by introducing more genetically diverse material into the gene pool (Wildt, 2000).

The cryopreservation of threatened species could nevertheless face some obstacles. Firstly, inaccessibility of biological material and expenses related to the collection of this could prove to be an obstacle due to the small population size. Secondly, an increase in the genetic diversity of small populations could be insufficient as the selective pressure could be overwhelmed by the effects of genetic drift, resulting in no adaptive reaction to selective pressure (Pertoldi et al., 2007).

Further implementation of cryopreservation in ex situ and in situ conservation strategies could be prioritized, as transportation of cryopreserved material is more favorable than the transportation of live animals (Hildebrandt et al., 2009; Hermes et al., 2013). Cryopreserved germplasm could play a key role in continuous gene flow between captive and wild populations of the same species, effectively increasing the genetic diversity of ex situ populations and preserving the genetic diversity of the species as a whole. Cryopreserved germplasm and captive bred individuals conceived using cryopreserved germplasm, could then be reintroduced into the wild, increasing the population size sufficiently and reducing the effects of genetic drift (Holt and Pickard, 1999; Hermes et al., 2013). Alternatively, the future priority of cryopreservation could lie in the selection of species, which have a sufficient population size.

The future of cryopreservation

In the future, efforts should be concentrated on the rather large gaps, particularly within the species-rich orders Rodentia and Chiroptera. This is especially relevant to Chiroptera spp., as to our knowledge no successful cryopreservation has been conducted within this order. Furthermore, focus is needed on the remaining Mammalia orders, which have not been examined at all.

The extraction of sperm post-coital or by urethral catheterization offers alternative extraction methods to the species, where prevalent extraction methods have been unsuccessful. These methods need further investigation in other species to acknowledge their encouraging successes.

Promising and alternative freezing methods include vitrification and freeze-drying. However, these methods have not been implemented to the same extent as conventional freezing methods and further studies are needed to determine their application to different species. Also, little information is available of the long-term storage of freeze-dried sperm from other species than laboratory house mouse. Further research is needed on the possibility of storing freeze-dried sperm at a higher temperature than -80°C for long periods of time (Kawase et al., 2005; Muneto and Horiuchi, 2011). Furthermore, estimations from Kawase et al. (2005) can be extrapolated to other cryopreservation protocols and thereby estimate the future success rates of freezing procedures.

Future experiments with the aim of simplifying freezing methods might also be an option. Both frozen and cooled sperm without cryoprotectants have shown successful results, which could give incentives to further protocols without cryoprotectants. Furthermore, the success of ICSI using sperm from a frozen whole mouse (Ogonuki et al., 2006) may encourage zoological gardens worldwide to store deceased animals in an ordinary deep freezer, when equipment for standard cryopreservation methods is unavailable.

Protocols developed for laboratory conditions serve as important groundwork for the development of protocols for field conditions. Protocol adjustments have to be made when extracting and handling biological material from wild populations, as field conditions rarely provide sufficient equipment for proper cryopreservation.

Examination of cryobiological traits prior to cryopreservation could be performed, as optimal protocols depend on these traits. Application of methods previously deemed successful for a particular set of traits could prove to be the optimal foundation when working with non-examined species. This has the potential of overcoming the difficulties associated with interspecific differences in cryotolerance (Comizzoli et al., 2012).

In the future, it will be necessary to exercise precaution against the risk of contamination; sterilization of liquid nitrogen by UV irradiation (Parmegiani et al., 2010) and disinfection of storage units (Bielanski, 2012) should therefore be implemented in cryopreservation protocols. Recommended methods and procedures to diminish the risk of disease transmission from post-thaw embryos and sperm to live animals is summarized in Bielanski (2012). Additionally, a thorough health examination of the donor animals could be considered to increase the chances of a later approval of transport across borders.

It has recently been suggested that the microbiome of animals may have implications for the successful reintroduction of animal species into the wild (Bahrndorff et al., 2016). Consequently, it could be argued that characterization of the microbiome and development of protocols for cryopreservation of symbiotic microorganisms should be considered, when developing cryopreservation protocol for a species of conservation interest.

To augment the overview of cryopreservation in Mammalia beyond the accomplishments of this review, the development of a peer-reviewed online database could be considered as it offers an easy and accessible overview, which provides incentives for scientists to continuously submit their work.

Table 1.

Species and subspecies included in this study in which the effect of cryopreservation on biological material has been examined. ‘Cryopreservation’ refers to the commonly used slow freezing method. Deviations around the mean are presented as standard error of mean, unless followed by * in which case it presents the standard deviation. ** Denotes range of values.

t01a_01.gif

Continued

t01b_01.gif

Continued

t01c_01.gif

Continued

t01d_01.gif

Continued

t01e_01.gif

Continued

t01f_01.gif

Continued

t01g_01.gif

Continued

t01h_01.gif

Continued

t01i_01.gif

Continued

t01j_01.gif

CONCLUSION

The accelerating decline in biodiversity calls for the implementation of cryobanks and cryopreservation in conservation strategies, which have the potential to assist and improve ex situ and in situ conservation. Cryopreservation of germplasm from wild populations has been successfully implemented in ex situ breeding programs. In the class Mammalia, at least 2.7% of species has been subject to examination in which the extent of successful cryopreservation and ARTs vary. The species examined belong to less than half of all orders, and a strongly disproportionate distribution of studies across orders has been observed. The application of cryopreservation should be considered in the species-rich or non-examined orders. The cryopreservation of germplasm has in several cases been successful and resulted in successful applications of ARTs. Domesticated species and species relevant for general research have been extensively examined. Protocols for threatened species have successfully been extrapolated from these examinations, which gives incentives for future conservation of genetic diversity in threatened species. Interspecific and intraspecific differences complicate the extrapolation of protocols from non-threatened to threatened species. One approach to be considered as a supplement to the extrapolation of protocols in closely related species is the examination and comparison of cryobiological traits. For the implementation of new genes from wild populations in ex situ breeding programs, the contamination and disease transmission risks are to be taken seriously, before routine transportation of cryopreserved material can be utilized. For the future development of cryopreservation, the alternative techniques mentioned should be considered. The development of a peer-reviewed online database should be considered, as it would offer an easy and accessible overview.

Acknowledgements

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to thank Aalborg University, Aalborg Zoo, and Randers Regnskov for providing materials and guidance. Thanks are also given to Knud Steenborg for providing insights into the reproductive physiology of various species of mammals.

COMPETING INTERESTS

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

SJC and MBN wrote the paper with major contributions by CRP, LT, MPK and TBS and significant contributions by CP and JS. All authors contributed to analysis, interpretations and conclusions.

REFERENCES

  1. Álamo D, Batista M, González F, Rodriguez N, Cruz G, Cabrera F, et al. ( 2005) Cryopreservation of semen in the dog: use of ultrafreezers of -152°C as a viable alternative to liquid nitrogen. Theriogenology 63: 72–82 Google Scholar

  2. Allen CD, Burridge M, Mulhall S, Chafer ML, Nicolson VN, Pyne M, et al. ( 2008) Successful artificial insemination in the koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) using extended and extended-chilled semen collected by electroejaculation. Biol Reprod 78: 661– 666 Google Scholar

  3. Amstislavsky S, Brusentsev E, Kizilova E, Igonina T, Abramova T, Rozhkova I ( 2015) Embryo cryopreservation and in vitro culture of preimplantation embryos in Campbell's hamster (Phodopus campbelli). Theriogenology 83: 1056–1063 Google Scholar

  4. An L, Chang S, Hu Y, Li Y, Xu B, Zhang F, et al. ( 2015) Efficient cryopreservation of mouse embryos by modified droplet vitrification (MDV). Cryobiology 71: 70–76 Google Scholar

  5. Anel L, Alvarez M, Anel E, Martinez-Pastor F, Martinez F, Chamorro C, et al. (2011) Evaluation of three different extenders for use in emergency salvaging of epididymal spermatozoa from a cantabric brown bear. Reprod Domestic Anim 46: e85–e90 Google Scholar

  6. Anel-López L, Álvarez-Rodríguez M, García-Álvarez O, Álvarez M, Maroto-Morales A, Anel L, et al. ( 2012) Reduced glutathione and trolox (vitamin e) as extender supplements in cryopreservation of red deer epididymal spermatozoa. Anim Reprod Sci 135: 37–46 Google Scholar

  7. Asada M, Horii M, Mogoe T, Fukui Y, Ishikawa H, Ohsumi S ( 2000) In vitro maturation and ultrastructural observation of cryopreserved minke whale (Balaenoptera acutorostrata) follicular oocytes. Biol Reprod 62: 253–259 Google Scholar

  8. Bahrawy K, El-Hassanein E, Rateb S ( 2012) Effect of collection frequency, extender and thawing temperature on the motility recovery of cryopreserved dromedary camel spermatozoa. J Animal and Poultry Prod 3: 73–82 Google Scholar

  9. Bahrndorff S, Alemu T, Alemneh T, Nielsen JL ( 2016) The microbiome of animals: Implications for conservation biology. International Journal of Genomics 2016: 1–7 Google Scholar

  10. Balmaceda JP, Heitman TO, Garcia MR, Pauerstein CJ, Pool TB ( 1986) Embryo cryopreservation in cynomolgus monkeys. Fertil Steril 45: 403–406 Google Scholar

  11. Baruah KK, Dhali A, Mech A, Bora B, Das J, Bora R, et al. ( 2013) Effect of concentration and addition method of glycerol on the quality of cryopreserved mithun (Bos frontalis) spermatozoa. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 97: 1051–1058 Google Scholar

  12. Baudi D, Jewgenow K, Pukazhenthi B, Spercoski K, Santos A, Reghelin A, et al. ( 2008) Influence of cooling rate on the ability of frozen-thawed sperm to bind to heterologous zona pellucida, as assessed by competitive in vitro binding assays in the ocelot (Leopardus pardalis) and tigrina (Leopardus tigrinus). Theriogenology 69: 204–211 Google Scholar

  13. Bezjian M, Abou-Madi N, Kollias GV, Parks JE, Cheong SH, Beltaire KA ( 2013) Characterization and cryopreservation of semen from endangered markhor goats (Capra falconeri heptneri) with evaluation of reproductive seasonality. J Zoo Wildl Med 44: 672–685 Google Scholar

  14. Bibi F ( 2013) A multi-calibrated mitochondrial phylogeny of extant bovidae (artiodactyla, ruminantia) and the importance of the fossil record to systematics. BMC Evol Biol 13: 1–15 Google Scholar

  15. Bickell C, Wolvekamp M, Shaw J ( 2001) The development of a simple freezing protocol for Common Wombat sperm. Theriogenology 55: 300 Google Scholar

  16. Bielanski A ( 2012) A review of the risk of contamination of semen and embryos during cryopreservation and measures to limit cross-contamination during banking to prevent disease transmission in ET practices. Theriogenology 77: 467–482 Google Scholar

  17. Bielanski A, Bergeron H, Lau P, Devenish J ( 2003) Microbial contamination of embryos and semen during long term banking in liquid nitrogen. Cryobiology 46: 146–152 Google Scholar

  18. Boutelle S, Lenahan K, Krisher R, Bauman K, Asa C, Silber S ( 2011) Vitrification of oocytes from endangered mexican gray wolves (Canis lupus baileyi). Theriogenology 75: 647–654 Google Scholar

  19. Breed W, Taggart D, Bradtke V, Leigh C, Gameau L, Carroll J ( 1994) Effect of cryopreservation on development and ultrastructure of preimplantation embryos from the dasyurid marsupial Sminthopsis crassicaudata. J Reprod Fertil 100: 429–438 Google Scholar

  20. Brusentsev E, Abramova T, Rozhkova I, Igonina T, Naprimerov V, Feoktistova N, et al. ( 2015) Cryopreservation and in vitro culture of preimplantation embryos in djungarian hamster (Phodopus sungorus). Reprod Domestic Anim 50: 677–683 Google Scholar

  21. Bucak MN, Sarıözkhan S, Tuncer PB, Sakin F, Ateşşahin A, Kulaksız, Çevik M ( 2010) The effect of antioxidants on postthawed Angora goat (Capra hircus ancryrensis) sperm parameters, lipid peroxidation and antioxidant activities. Small Ruminant Research 89: 24–30 Google Scholar

  22. Candy C, Wood M, Whittingham D ( 1995) Follicular development in cryopreserved marmoset ovarian tissue after transplantation. Hum Reprod 10: 2334–2338 Google Scholar

  23. Cardoso RCS, Silva AR, da Silva LDM ( 2006) Comparison of two dilution rates on canine semen quality after cryopreservation in a coconut water extender. Anim Reprod Sci 92: 384–391 Google Scholar

  24. Carretero M, Neild D, Ferrante A, Caldevilla M, Arraztoa C, Fumuso F, et al. ( 2015) Effect of cryoprotectant and equilibration temperature on cryopreservation of Lama glama spermatozoa. Andrologia 47: 685–693 Google Scholar

  25. Cary JA, Madill S, Farnsworth K, Hayna JT, Duoos L, Fahning ML ( 2004) A comparison of electroejaculation and epididymal sperm collection techniques in stallions. Can Vet J 45: 35–41 Google Scholar

  26. Castelo TS, Silva AM, Bezerra LGP, Costa CYM, Lago AEA, Bezerra JAB, et al. ( 2015) Comparison among different cryoprotectants for cryopreservation of epididymal sperm from agouti (Dasyprocta leporina). Cryobiology 71: 442–447 Google Scholar

  27. Ceballos G, Ehrlich PR, Barnosky AD, Garcıa A, Pringle RM, Palmer TM ( 2015) Accelerated modern human-induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction. Sci Adv 1: 1–5 Google Scholar

  28. Chatiza FP, Bartels P, Nedambale TL, Wagenaar GM ( 2012) Computer assisted sperm analysis of motility patterns of postthawed epididymal spermatozoa of springbok (Antidorcas marsupialis), impala (Aepyceros melampus), and blesbok (Damaliscus dorcus phillipsi) incubated under conditions supporting domestic cattle in vitro fertilization. Theriogenology 78: 402–414 Google Scholar

  29. Cheng FP, Wu JT, Chan JPW, Wang JS, Fung HP, Colenbrander B, et al. ( 2004) The effect of different extenders on post-thaw sperm survival, acrosomal integrity and longevity in cryopreserved semen of formosan sika deer and formosan sambar deer. Theriogenology 61: 1605–1616 Google Scholar

  30. Christensen BW, Asa CS, Wang C, Vansandt L, Bauman K, Callahan M, et al. ( 2011) Effect of semen collection method on sperm motility of gray wolves (Canis lupus) and domestic dogs (C. I. familiaris). Theriogenology 76: 975–980 Google Scholar

  31. Clubb R, Rowcliffe M, Lee P, Mar KU, Moss C, Mason GJ ( 2008) Compromised survivorship in zoo elephants. Science 322: 1649 Google Scholar

  32. Comizzoli P, Songsasen N, Hagedorn M, Wildt DE ( 2012) Comparative cryobiological traits and requirements for gametes and gonadal tissues collected from wildlife species. Theriogenology 78: 1666–1681 Google Scholar

  33. Cranfield MR, Berger NG, Kempske S, Bavister BD, Boatman DE, laleggio DM ( 1992) Macaque monkey birth following transfer of in vitro fertilized, frozen-thawed embryos to a surrogate mother. Theriogenology 37: 197 Google Scholar

  34. Crosier AE, Henghali JN, Howard J, Pukazhenthi BS, Terrell KA, Marker LL, et al. ( 2009) Improved quality of cryopreserved cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) spermatozoa after centrifugation through accudenz. J Androl 30: 298–308 Google Scholar

  35. Crump JJ, Crump J ( 1994) Manual semen collection from a Grevy's zebra stallion (Equus grevyi), onset of sperm production, semen characteristics, and cryopreservation of semen, with a comparison to the sperm production from a Grant's zebra stallion (Equus burchelli boehmi). Theriogenology 41: 1011–1021 Google Scholar

  36. Curnow EC, Kuleshova LL, Shaw JM, Hayes ES ( 2002) Comparison of slow- and rapid-cooling protocols for early-cleavagestage Macaca fascicularis embryos. Am J Primatol 58: 169– 174 Google Scholar

  37. Czarny NA, Rodger J ( 2010) Vitrification as a method for genome resource banking oocytes from the endangered tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii). Cryobiology 60: 322–325 Google Scholar

  38. Czarny NA, Harris MS, de luliis GN, Rodger JC ( 2009) Acrosomal integrity, viability, and DNA damage of sperm from dasyurid marsupials after freezing or freeze drying. Theriogenology 72: 817–825 Google Scholar

  39. de Jong CE, Jonsson N, Field H, Smith C, Crichton EG, Phillips N, et al. ( 2005) Collection, seminal characteristics and chilled storage of spermatozoa from three species of free-range flying fox (Pteropus spp.). Theriogenology 64: 1072–1089 Google Scholar

  40. De Mayo FJ, Rawlins RG, Dukelow WR ( 1985) Xenogenous and in vitro fertilization of frozen/thawed primate oocytes and blastomere separation of embryos. Fertil Steril 43: 295–300 Google Scholar

  41. Dong Q, Rodenburg SE, Huang C, VandeVoort CA ( 2008) Effect of pre-freezing conditions on semen cryopreservation of rhesus monkey. Theriogenology 70: 61–69 Google Scholar

  42. Dorsch MM, Glage S, Hedrich HJ ( 2008) Collection and cryopreservation of preimplantation embryos of Cavia porcellus. Lab Anim 42: 489–494 Google Scholar

  43. Durrant B ( 1987) Penetration of hamster ova by nonhuman primate spermatozoa. J Androl 8: 27 Google Scholar

  44. Farstad W, Fougner J, Torres C ( 1992) The optimum time for single artificial insemination of blue fox vixens (Alonex lagonus) with frozen-thawed semen from silver foxes (Vulnes vulpes). Theriogenology 38: 853–865 Google Scholar

  45. Fernandez-Gonzalez L, Hribal R, Stagegaard J, Zahmel J, Jewgenow K ( 2015) Production of lion (Panthera leo) blastocysts after in vitro maturation of oocytes and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Theriogenology 83: 995–999 Google Scholar

  46. Fernández-Santos MR, Soler AJ, Ramón M, Ros-Santaella JL, Maroto-Morales A, García-Álvarez O, et al. ( 2011) Effect of post-mortem time on post-thaw characteristics of Spanish ibex (Capra pyrenaica) spermatozoa. Anim Reprod Sci 129: 56–66 Google Scholar

  47. Fickel J, Wagener A, Ludwig A ( 2007) Semen cryopreservation and the conservation of endangered species. Eur J Wildl Res 53: 81–89 Google Scholar

  48. Fujihira T, Kobayashi M, Hochi S, Hirabayashi M, Ishikawa H, Ohsumi S, et al. ( 2006) Developmental capacity of antarctic minke whale (Balaenoptera bonaerensis) vitrified oocytes following in vitro maturation, and parthenogenetic activation or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Zygote 14: 89–95 Google Scholar

  49. Fujino Y, Kojima T, Nakamura Y, Kobayashi H, Kikuchi K, Funahashi H ( 2008) Metal mesh vitrification (MMV) method for cryopreservation of porcine embryos. Theriogenology 70: 809–817 Google Scholar

  50. Gagliardi C, Myers L, Kubisch HM ( 2008) Postthaw survival of rhesus macaque sperm: Variation in the response of individual males to different freezing protocols. Am J Primatol 70: 1093– 1096 Google Scholar

  51. Galiguis J, Gómez MC, Leibo SP, Pope CE ( 2014) Birth of a domestic cat kitten produced by vitrification of lipid polarized in vitro matured oocytes. Cryobiology 68: 459–466 Google Scholar

  52. Gãnán N, González R, Garde JJ, Martínez F, Vargas A, Gomendio M, et al. ( 2009a) Assessment of semen quality, sperm cryopreservation and heterologous IVF in the critically endangered iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus). Reprod Fertil Dev 21: 848–859 Google Scholar

  53. Gãnán N, González R, Sestelo A, Garde JJ, Sánchez I, Aguilar JM, et al. ( 2009b) Male reproductive traits, semen cryopreservation, and heterologous in vitro fertilization in the bobcat (Lynx rufus). Theriogenology 72: 341–352 Google Scholar

  54. Gilmore JA, McGann LE, Ashworth E, Acker JP, Raath JP, Bush M, et al. ( 1998) Fundamental cryobiology of selected african mammalian spermatozoa and its role in biodiversity preservation through the development of genome resource banking. Anim Reprod Sci 53: 277–297 Google Scholar

  55. Goodrowe KL, Walker SL, Ryckman DP, Mastromonaco GF, Hay MA, Bateman HL, et al. (2000) Piecing together the puzzle of carnivore reproduction. Anim Reprod Sci 60–61: 389–403 Google Scholar

  56. Grout BWW, Morris GJ ( 2009) Contaminated liquid nitrogen vapour as a risk factor in pathogen transfer. Theriogenology 71: 1079– 1082 Google Scholar

  57. Guaitolini CRF, Taffarel MO, Teixeira NS, Sudano MJ, Freitas PMC, Lopes MD, et al. ( 2012) Post-thaw viability of in vivo produced canine blastocysts cryopreserved by slow freezing. Theriogenology 78: 576–582 Google Scholar

  58. Gunasena KT, Lakey JRT, Villines PM, Bush M, Raath C, Critser ES et al. ( 1998) Antral follicles develop in xenografted cryopreserved african elephant (Loxodonta africana) ovarian tissue. Anim Reprod Sci 53: 265–275 Google Scholar

  59. Haigh JC, Dradjat AS, English AW ( 1993) Comparison of two extenders for the cryopreservation of chital (Axis axis) semen. J Zoo Wildl Med 24: 454–458 Google Scholar

  60. Hearn JP, Summers PM ( 1986) Experimental manipulation of embryo implantation in the marmoset monkey and exotic equids. Theriogenology 25: 3–11 Google Scholar

  61. Hedrick PW, Garcia-Dorado A ( 2016) Understanding inbreeding depression, purging, and genetic rescue. Trends Ecol Evolut 31: 940–952 Google Scholar

  62. Heinrichs JA, Bender DJ, Schumaker NH ( 2016) Habitat degradation and loss as key drivers of regional population extinction. Ecolo Model 335: 64–73 Google Scholar

  63. Hermes R, Hildebrandt TB, Blottner S, Walzer C, Silinski S, Patton ML, et al. ( 2005) Reproductive soundness of captive southern and northern white rhinoceroses (Ceratotherium simum simum, C. s. cottoni): evaluation of male genital tract morphology and semen quality before and after cryopreservation. Theriogenology 63: 219–239 Google Scholar

  64. Hermes R, Göritz F, Saragusty J, Sós E, Molnar V, Reid CE, et al. ( 2009) First successful artificial insemination with frozenthawed semen in rhinoceros. Theriogenology 71: 393–399 Google Scholar

  65. Hermes R, Saragusty J, Göritz F, Bartels P, Potier R, Baker B, et al. ( 2013) Freezing african elephant semen as a new population management tool. PLOS ONE 8: 1–8 Google Scholar

  66. Herold FC, de Haas K, Colenbrander B, Gerber D ( 2006) Comparison of equilibration times when freezing epididymal sperm from African buffalo (Syncerus caffer) using Triladyl™ or AndroMed®. Theriogenology 66: 1123–1130 Google Scholar

  67. Hildebrandt TB, Roellig K, Goeritz F, Fassbender M, Krieg R, Blottner S, et al. ( 2009) Artificial insemination of captive European brown hares (Lepus europaeus PALLAS, 1778) with fresh and cryopreserved semen derived from free-ranging males. Theriogenology 72: 1065–1072 Google Scholar

  68. Hildebrandt TB, Hermes R, Saragusty J, Potier R, Schwammer HM, Balfanz F, et al. ( 2012) Enriching the captive elephant population genetic pool through artificial insemination with frozenthawed semen collected in the wild. Theriogenology 78: 1398– 1404 Google Scholar

  69. Hochi S, Kozawa M, Fujimoto T, Hondo E, Yamada J, Oguri N ( 1996) In vitro maturation and transmission electron microscopic observation of horse oocytes after vitrification. Cryobiology 33: 300–310 Google Scholar

  70. Holt WV ( 2000) Fundamental aspects of sperm cryobiology: The importance of species and individual differences. Theriogenology 53: 47–58 Google Scholar

  71. Holt WV, Moore HDM, North RD, Hartman TD, Hodges JK ( 1988) Hormonal and behavioural detection of oestrus in blackbuck, Antilope cervicapra, and successful artificial insemination with fresh and frozen semen. J Reprod Fert 82: 717–725 Google Scholar

  72. Holt WV, Pickard AR ( 1999) Role of reproductive technologies and genetic resource banks in animal conservation role of reproductive technologies and genetic resource banks in animal conservation. Rev Reprod 4: 143–150 Google Scholar

  73. Honaramooz A, Snedaker A, Dobrinski I ( 2004) A game of cat and mouse: Xenografting of testis tissue from domestic kittens results in complete cat spermatogenesis in a mouse host. J Androl 25: 926–930 Google Scholar

  74. Huang Y, Li D, Zhou Y, Zhou Q, Li R, Wang C, et al. ( 2012) Factors affecting the outcome of artificial insemination using cryopreserved spermatozoa in the giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca). Zoo Biol 31: 561–573 Google Scholar

  75. Niu HR, Zi XD, Xiao X, Xiong XR, Zhong JC, Li J, et al. ( 2014) Developmental competence of frozen-thawed yak (Bos grunniens) oocytes followed by in vitro maturation and fertilization. Cryobiology 68: 152–154 Google Scholar

  76. Imrat P, Hernandez M, Rittem S, Thongtip N, Mahasawangkul S, Gosálvez J, et al. ( 2012) The dynamics of sperm DNA stability in Asian elephant (Elephas maximus) spermatozoa before and after cryopreservation. Theriogenology 77: 998–1007 Google Scholar

  77. Isachenko V, Folch J, Isachenko E, Nawroth F, Krivokharchenko A, Vajta G, et al. ( 2003) Double vitrification of rat embryos at different developmental stages using an identical protocol. Theriogenology 60: 445–452 Google Scholar

  78. Johnson AEM, Freeman EW, Wildt DE, Songsasen N ( 2014) Spermatozoa from the maned wolf (Chrysocyon brachyurus) display typical canid hyper-sensitivity to osmotic and freezing-induced injury, but respond favorably to dimethyl sulfoxide. Cryobiology 68: 361–370 Google Scholar

  79. Johnston LA, Lacy RC ( 1995) Genome resource banking for species conservation: Selection of sperm donors. Cryobiology 32: 68–77 Google Scholar

  80. Johnston SD, MacCallum C, Blyde D, McClean R, Lisle A, Holt WV ( 2006) An investigation into the similarities and differences governing the cryopreservation success of koala (Phascolarctos cinereus: goldfuss) and common wombat (Vombatus ursinus: shaw) spermatozoa. Cryobiology 53: 218–228 Google Scholar

  81. Johnston SD, López-Fernández C, Gosálbez A, Holt WV, Gosálvez J ( 2009) Directional mapping of DNA nicking in ejaculated and cauda epididymidal spermatozoa of the short-beaked echidna (Tachyglossus aculeatus: Monotremata). Reprod Fertil Dev 21: 1008–1014 Google Scholar

  82. Kaneko T, Serikawa T ( 2012a) Long-term preservation of freezedried mouse spermatozoa. Cryobiology 64: 211–214 Google Scholar

  83. Kaneko T, Serikawa T ( 2012b) Successful longterm preservation of rat sperm by freeze-drying. PLOS ONE 7: 1–4 Google Scholar

  84. Kaneko T, Yamamura A, Ide Y, Ogi M, Yanagita T, Nakagata N ( 2006) Long-term cryopreservation of mouse sperm. Theriogenology 66: 1098–1101 Google Scholar

  85. Kaneko T, Ito H, Sakamoto H, Onuma M, Inoue-Murayama M ( 2014) Sperm preservation by freeze-drying for the conservation of wild animals. PLOS ONE 9: 1–4 Google Scholar

  86. Kashiwazaki N, Nakatsukasa E, Katsumi A, Tachi C, Shino M ( 2001) Freezing epididymal spermatozoa of the Japanese serow (Capricornis crispus) in liquid nitrogen. J Reprod Dev 47: 359–363 Google Scholar

  87. Kasso M, Balakrishnan M ( 2013) Ex situ conservation of biodiversity with particular emphasis to ethiopia. ISRN Biodiversity 2013: 1–11 Google Scholar

  88. Kawase Y, Araya H, Kamada N, Jishage K, Suzuki H ( 2005) Possibility of long-term preservation of freeze-dried mouse spermatozoa. Biol Reprod 72: 568–573 Google Scholar

  89. Keeley T, McGreevy PD, O'Brien JK ( 2012) Cryopreservation of epididymal sperm collected postmortem in the Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii). Theriogenology 78: 315–325 Google Scholar

  90. Khalifa T, Lymberopoulos A, Theodosiadou E ( 2013) Association of soybean-based extenders with field fertility of stored ram (Ovis aries) semen: A randomized double-blind parallel group design. Theriogenology 79: 517–527 Google Scholar

  91. Klaus C, Eder S, Franz C, Müller K ( 2016) Successful cryopreservation of domestic cat (Felis catus) epididymal sperm after slow equilibration to 15 or 10°C. Reprod Domestic Anim 51: 195– 203 Google Scholar

  92. Kozdrowski R, Dubiel A, Siemieniuch M ( 2006) Preliminary studies on cryopreservation of hare (Lepus europaeus Pallas, 1778) semen. Anim Reprod Sci 93: 379–382 Google Scholar

  93. Kraemer DC, Cruz NCV ( 1969) Collection, gross characteristics and freezing of baboon semen. J Reprod Fertil 20: 345–348 Google Scholar

  94. Krishnakumar S, Whiteside DP, Elkin B, Thundathil JC ( 2011) Evaluation of an animal protein-free semen extender for cryopreservation of epididymal sperm from North American bison (Bison bison). Theriogenology 76: 252–260 Google Scholar

  95. Krzywiñski A ( 1981) Freezing of post mortem collected semen form moose and red deer. Acta Theriol 26: 424–426 Google Scholar

  96. Kuwayama M ( 2007) Highly efficient vitrification for cryopreservation of human oocytes and embryos: The Cryotop method. Theriogenology 67: 73–80 Google Scholar

  97. Lambert H, Citino S, Collazo I, Jeyendran RS ( 1991) Penetration of zona-free hamster oocytes by ejaculated cryopreserved gorilla spermatozoa. Fertil Steril 56: 1201–1203 Google Scholar

  98. Lanzendorf SE, Zelinski-Wooten MB, Stouffer RL, Wolf DP ( 1990) Maturity at collection and the developmental potential of rhesus monkey oocytes. Biol Reprod 42: 703–711 Google Scholar

  99. Leão DL, Miranda SA, Brito AB, Lima JS, Santos RR, Domingues SFS ( 2015) Efficacious long-term cooling and freezing of Sapajus apella semen in ACP-118®. Anim Reprod Sci 159: 118–123 Google Scholar

  100. Leon-Quinto T, Simon MA, Cadenas R, Jones J, Martinez-Hernandez FJ, Moreno JM, et al. (2009) Developing biological resource banks as a supporting tool for wildlife reproduction and conservation the Iberian lynx bank as a model for other endangered species. Anim Reprod Sci 112: 347–361 Google Scholar

  101. Li Y, Cai K, Su L, Guan M, He X, Wang H, et al. ( 2005) Cryopreservation of cynomolgus monkey (Macaca fascicularis) spermatozoa in a chemically defined extender. Asian J Androl 7: 139– 144 Google Scholar

  102. Liu W, Luo M, Huang P, Yue L, Wang L, Zhao C, et al. ( 2009) Comparative study between slow freezing and vitrification of mouse embryos using different cryoprotectants. Reprod Domestic Anim 44: 788–791 Google Scholar

  103. Lockyear KM, Goodrowe KL, Waddell WT, MacDonald SE ( 2009) Comparison of different osmolalities and egg-yolk composition in processing media for the cryopreservation of red wolf (Canis rufus) sperm. Theriogenology 71: 469–479 Google Scholar

  104. Lozano H, Wirtu G, Pope CE, Cole A, Dresser BL ( 2016) Comparative cryopreservation of eland (Taurotragus oryx), bongo (Tragelaphus euryceros) and domestic bull spermatozoa. Anim Reprod Sci 169: 120 Google Scholar

  105. Lueders I, Luther I, Scheepers G, van der Horst G ( 2012) Improved semen collection method for wild felids: Urethral catheterization yields high sperm quality in African lions (Panthera leo). Theriogenology 78: 696–701 Google Scholar

  106. MacCallum C, Johnston SD ( 2005) Studies on the cryopreservation of common wombat (Vombatus ursinus) spermatozoa. Reprod Fertil Dev 17: 727–732 Google Scholar

  107. Maksudov GY, Shishova NV, Katkov II (2008) In the cycle of life: Cryopreservation of post-mortem sperm as a valuable source in restoration of rare and endangered species. In “Endangered Species: New Research” Ed by AM Columbus, LV Kuznetsov, NOVA Publishers, New York, pp 189–240 Google Scholar

  108. McClean R, Zee YP, Holt WV, Johnston SD ( 2008) Cryopreservation of kangaroo spermatozoa using alternative approaches that reduce cytotoxic exposure to glycerol. Cryobiology 57: 304–307 Google Scholar

  109. Melville DF, Johnston SD, Miller RR Jr ( 2012) Flyingfox (Pteropus spp.) sperm membrane fatty acid composition, its relationship to cold shock injury and implications for cryopreservation success. Cryobiology 65: 224–229 Google Scholar

  110. Mercado ED, Rodríguez A, Gómez E, Sanz E ( 2010) Cryopreservation of Iberian pig spermatozoa. Comparison of different freezing extenders based on post-thaw sperm quality. Anim Reprod Sci 118: 54–61 Google Scholar

  111. Merlo B, lacono E, Regazzini M, Zambelli D ( 2008) Cat blastocysts produced in vitro from oocytes vitrified using the cryoloop technique and cryopreserved electroejaculated semen. Theriogenology 70: 126–130 Google Scholar

  112. Milenkovic M, Diaz-Garcia C, Wallin A, Brännström M ( 2012) Viability and function of the cryopreserved whole rat ovary: Comparison between slow-freezing and vitrification. Fertil Steril 97: 1176–1182 Google Scholar

  113. Minter LJ, DeLiberto TJ ( 2005) Influence of extender, freezing rate, and thawing rate on post-thaw motility, viability and morphology of coyote (Canis latrans) spermatozoa. Theriogenology 64: 1898–1912 Google Scholar

  114. Mocé E, Vicente JS ( 2009) Rabbit sperm cryopreservation: A review. Anim Reprod Sci 110: 1–24 Google Scholar

  115. Mogoe T, Fukui Y, Ishikawa H, Ohsumi S ( 1998) Morphological observations of frozen-thawed spermatozoa of Southern minke whales (Balaenoptera acutorostrata). J Reprod Dev 44: 95–100 Google Scholar

  116. Molinia FC, Rodger JC ( 1996) Pellet-freezing spermatozoa of two marsupials: The tammar wallaby, Macropus eugenii, and the brushtail possum, Trichosurus vulpecula. Reprod Fertil Dev 8: 681–684 Google Scholar

  117. Mollineau WM, Adogwa AO, Garcia GW ( 2011) Liquid and frozen storage of agouti (Dasyprocta leporina) semen extended with UHT milk, unpasteurized coconut water, and pasteurized coconut water. Vet Med Int 2011: 1–5 Google Scholar

  118. Montano GA, Kraemer DC, Love CC, Robeck TR, O'Brien JK ( 2012) Evaluation of motility, membrane status and DNA integrity of frozen-thawed bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) spermatozoa after sex-sorting and recryopreservation. Reproduction 143: 799–813 Google Scholar

  119. Morar IA, Groza IS, Borzan M, Páll E, Neagu VR, Pop AR, et al. ( 2010) Studies regarding collection, evaluation and conservation of European mouflon (Ovis ammon musimon) semen. Lucrări Stiinłifice Medicină Veterinară 2: 15–24 Google Scholar

  120. Morrow CJ, Asher GW, Berg DK, Tervit HR, Pugh PA, McMillan WH, et al. ( 1994) Embryo transfer in fallow deer (Dama dama): Superovulation, embryo recovery and laparoscopic transfer of fresh and cryopreserved embryos. Theriogenology 42: 579– 590 Google Scholar

  121. Morton KM, Evans G, Maxwell WMC ( 2010) Effect of glycerol concentration, Equex STM® supplementation and liquid storage prior to freezing on the motility and acrosome integrity of frozen-thawed epididymal alpaca (Vicugna pacos) sperm. Theriogenology 74: 311–316 Google Scholar

  122. Muneto T, Horiuchi T ( 2011) Full-term development of hamster embryos produced by injecting freeze-dried spermatozoa into oocytes. J Mamm Ova Res 28: 32–39 Google Scholar

  123. Nalley WMM, Handarini R, Yusuf TL, Purwantara B, Semiadi G ( 2011) The effect of glycerol concentration in TRIS glucose egg yolk extender on the quality of Timor deer frozen semen. J Indonesian Trop Anim Agrie 36: 91–96 Google Scholar

  124. Ng SC, Martelli P, Liow SL, Herbert S, Oh SH ( 2002) Intracytoplasmic injection of frozen-thawed epididymal spermatozoa in a nonhuman primate model, the cynomolgus monkey (Macaca fascicularis). Theriogenology 58: 1385–1397 Google Scholar

  125. Niasari-Naslaji A, Mosaferi S, Bahmani N, Gerami A, Gharahdaghi AA, Abarghani A, et al. ( 2007) Semen cryopreservation in Bactrian camel (Camelus bactrianus) using SHOTOR diluent: Effects of cooling rates and glycerol concentrations. Theriogenology 68: 618–625 Google Scholar

  126. Nizanski W ( 2006) Intravaginal insemination of bitches with fresh and frozen-thawed semen with addition of prostatic fluid: Use of an infusion pipette and the Osiris catheter. Theriogenology 66: 470–483 Google Scholar

  127. Nöthling JO, Shuttleworth R ( 2005) The effect of straw size, freezing rate and thawing rate upon post-thaw quality of dog semen. Theriogenology 63: 1469–1480 Google Scholar

  128. O'Brien JK, Robeck TR ( 2006) Development of sperm sexing and associated assisted reproductive technology for sex preselection of captive bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). Reprod Fertil Dev 18: 319–329 Google Scholar

  129. O'Brien JK, Robeck TR ( 2010) Preservation of beluga (Delphinapterus leucas) spermatozoa using a trehalose-based cryodiluent and directional freezing technology. Reprod Fertil Dev 22: 653–663 Google Scholar

  130. O'Brien JK, Roth TL ( 2000a) Functional capacity and fertilizing longevity of frozen-thawed scimitarhorned oryx (Oryx dammah) spermatozoa in a heterologous in vitro fertilization system. Reprod Fertil Dev 12: 413–421 Google Scholar

  131. O'Brien JK, Roth TL ( 2000b) Post-coital sperm recovery and cryopreservation in the Sumatran rhinoceros (Dicerorhinus sumatrensis) and application to gamete rescue in the African black rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis). J Reprod Fertil 118: 263– 271 Google Scholar

  132. O'Brien JK, Hollinshead FK, Evans KM, Evans G, Maxwell WMC ( 2003) Flow cytometric sorting of frozen-thawed spermatozoa in sheep and non-human primates. Reprod Fertil Dev 15: 367– 375 Google Scholar

  133. O'Brien JK, Stojanov T, Crichton EG, Evans KM, Leigh D, Maxwell WMC, et al. ( 2005) Flow cytometric sorting of fresh and frozenthawed spermatozoa in the Western lowland gorilla (Gorilla gorilla gorilla). Am J Primatol 66: 297–315 Google Scholar

  134. O'Brien JK, Steinman KJ, Montano GA, Love CC, Robeck TR ( 2013) Sperm DNA fragmentation and morphological degeneration in chilled elephant (Elephas maximus and Loxodonta africana) semen collected by transrectal massage. Andrology 1: 387–400 Google Scholar

  135. Ogonuki N, Mochida K, Miki H, Inoue K, Fray M, Iwaki T, et al. ( 2006) Spermatozoa and spermatids retrieved from frozen reproductive organs or frozen whole bodies of male mice can produce normal offspring. PNAS 103: 13098–13103 Google Scholar

  136. Okano T, Murase T, Tsubota T ( 2004) Electroejaculation and semen cryopreservation of free-ranging Japanese black bears (Ursus thibetanus japonicus). J Vet Med Sci 66: 1371–1376 Google Scholar

  137. Okano T, Murase T, Yayota C, Komatsu T, Miyazawa K, Asano M, et al. ( 2006). Characteristics of captive Japanese black bears (Ursus thibetanus japonicus) semen collected by electroejaculation with different voltages for stimulation and frozen-thawed under different conditions. Anim Reprod Sci 95: 134–143 Google Scholar

  138. Oliveira KG, Miranda SA, Leão DL, Brito AB, Santos RR, Domingues SFS ( 2011) Semen coagulum liquefaction, sperm activation and cryopreservation of capuchin monkey (Cebus apella) semen in coconut water solution (CWS) and TES-TRIS. Anim Reprod Sci 123: 75–80 Google Scholar

  139. Oliveira KG, Leão DL, Almeida DVC, Santos RR, Domingues SFS ( 2015) Seminal characteristics and cryopreservation of sperm from the squirrel monkey, Saimiri collinsi. Theriogenology 84: 743–749 Google Scholar

  140. Oliveira KG, Santos RR, Leão DL, Brito AB, Lima JS, Sampaio WV, et al. ( 2016) Cooling and freezing of sperm from captive, freeliving and endangered squirrel monkey species. Cryobiology 72: 283–289 Google Scholar

  141. Panyaboriban S, Singh RP, Songsasen N, Padilla L, Brown J, Reed D, et al. ( 2016) Reproductive seasonality and sperm cryopreservation in the male tufted deer (Elaphodus cephalophus). Theriogenology 86: 914–923 Google Scholar

  142. Paris DBBP, Taggart DA, Shaw G, Temple-Smith PD, Renfree MB ( 2005) Birth of pouch young after artificial insemination in the tammar wallaby (Macropus eugenii). Biol Reprod 72: 451–559 Google Scholar

  143. Parmegiani L, Accorsi A, Cognigni GE, Bernardi S, Troilo E, Filicori M ( 2010) Sterilization of liquid nitrogen with ultraviolet irradiation for safe vitrification of human oocytes or embryos. Fertil Steril 94: 1525–1528 Google Scholar

  144. Penfold LM ( 2008) 87 Osmotic sensitivity of okapi spermatozoa and development of cryopreservation protocols using cryomicroscopy. Reprod Fertil Dev 20: 124 Google Scholar

  145. Penfold LM, Monfort SL, Wolfe BA, Citino SB, Wildt DE ( 2005) Reproductive physiology and artificial insemination studies in wild and captive gerenuk (Litocranius walleri walleri). Reprod Fertil Dev 17: 707–714 Google Scholar

  146. Pereira LC, Ferreira-Silva JC, Cantanhêde LF, Neto HFV, Andrade JC, Souza BPA, Moura MT, Oliveira MAL ( 2016) Viability of in vitro produced embryos of Gyr cattle (Bos indicus) after cryopreservation by vitrifcation under field conditions. Bol. Ind. Anim. 73: 159–164 Google Scholar

  147. Pérez-Garnelo SS, Oter M, Borque C, Talavera C, Delclaux M, Martınez-Nevado E, et al. ( 2006) Post-thaw viability of European bison (Bison bonasus) semen frozen with extenders containing egg yolk or lipids of plant origin and examined with a heterologous in vitro fertilization assay. J Zoo Wildl Med 37: 116–125 Google Scholar

  148. Pertoldi C, Bijlsma B, Loeschcke V ( 2007) Conservation genetics in a globally changing environment: Present problems, paradoxes and future challenges. Biodivers Conserv 16: 4147–4163 Google Scholar

  149. Ping S, Wang F, Zhang Y, Wu C, Tang W, Luo Y, et al. ( 2011) Cryopreservation of epididymal sperm in tree shrews (Tupaia belangeri). Theriogenology 76: 39–46 Google Scholar

  150. Ping S, Yue F, Wang C, Luo Y, Si W, Yang S ( 2012) Effects of dimethyl sulfoxide, ethylene glycol, propylene glycol and glycerol on cryopreservation of wild tree shrew (Tupaia belangeri chinese) cauda epididymal sperm. J Anim Vet Adv 11: 3568– 3574 Google Scholar

  151. Poels J, Langendonckt AV, Dehoux JP, Donneza J, Wyns C ( 2012) Vitrification of non-human primate immature testicular tissue allows maintenance of proliferating spermatogonial cells after xenografting to recipient mice. Theriogenology 77: 1008–1013 Google Scholar

  152. Ponce AA, Carrascosa RE, Aires VA, de Cuneo MF, Ruiz RD, Ponzio MF, et al. ( 1998a) Activity of Chinchilla laniger spermatozoa collected by electroejaculation and cryopreserved. Theriogenology 50: 1239–1249 Google Scholar

  153. Ponce AA, Aires VA, Carrascosa RE, de Cuneo MF, Ruiz RD, Lacuara JL ( 1998b) Functional activity of epididymal Chinchilla laniger spermatozoa cryopreserved in different extenders. Res Vet Sci 64: 239–243 Google Scholar

  154. Ponzio MF, Busso JM, de Cuneo MF, Ruiz RD, Ponce AA ( 2008) Functional activity of frozen thawed Chinchilla lanigera spermatozoa cryopreserved with glycerol or ethylene glycol. Reprod Domestic Anim 43: 228–233 Google Scholar

  155. Pope CE, Pope VZ, Beck LR ( 1984) Live birth following cryopreservation and transfer of a baboon embryo. Fertil Steril 42: 143– 145 Google Scholar

  156. Pope CE, Pope VZ, Beck LR ( 1986) Cryopreservation and transfer of baboon embryos. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf 3: 33–39 Google Scholar

  157. Pope CE, Dresser BL, Chin NW, Liu JH, Loskutoff NM, Behnke EJ, et al. ( 1997) Birth of a Western lowland gorilla (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) following in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Am J Primatol 41: 247–260 Google Scholar

  158. Portas T, Johnston SD, Hermes R, Arroyo F, López-Fernadez C, Bryant B, et al. ( 2009) Frozen-thawed rhinoceros sperm exhibit DNA damage shortly after thawing when assessed by the sperm chromatin dispersion assay. Theriogenology 72: 711– 720 Google Scholar

  159. Pothana L, Makala H, Devi L, Varma VP, Goel S ( 2015) Germ cell differentiation in cryopreserved, immature, Indian spotted mouse deer (Moschiola indica) testes xenografted onto mice. Theriogenology 83: 625–633 Google Scholar

  160. Pothana L, Venna NK, Devi L, Singh A, Chatterjee I, Goel S ( 2016) Cryopreservation of adult primate testes. Eur J Wildl Res 62: 619–626 Google Scholar

  161. Pradiee J, O'brien E, Esteso MC, Castaño C, Toledano-Díaz A, Lopez-Sebastián A, et al. ( 2016) Effect of shortening the prefreezing equilibration time with glycerol on the quality of chamois (Rupicapra pyrenaica), ibex (Capra pyrenaica), mouflon (Ovis musimon) and aoudad (Ammotragus lervia) ejaculates. Anim Reprod Sci 171: 121–128 Google Scholar

  162. Prieto MT, Sánchez-Calabuig MJ, Hildebrandt TB, Santiago-Moreno J, Saragusty J ( 2014) Sperm cryopreservation in wild animals. Eur J Wildl Res 60: 851–864 Google Scholar

  163. Prieto-Pablos MT, Sánchez-Calabuig MJ, Hildebrandt TB, Göritz F, Ortmann S, Eder S, et al. ( 2016) Cryopreservation of captive roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) semen. Theriogenology 86: 695–703 Google Scholar

  164. Pukazhenthi B, Laroe D, Crosier A, Bush LM, Spindler R, Pelican KM, et al. ( 2006) Challenges in cryopreservation of clouded leopard (Neofelis nebulosa) spermatozoa. Theriogenology 66: 1790–1796 Google Scholar

  165. Pukazhenthi BS, Togna GD, Padilla L, Smith D, Sanchez C, Pelican K, et al. ( 2011) Ejaculate traits and sperm cryopreservation in the endangered Baird's tapir (Tapirus bairdii). J Androl 32: 260–270 Google Scholar

  166. Pukazhenthi BS, Johnson A, Guthrie HD, Songsasen N, Padilla LR, Wolfe BA, et al. ( 2014) Improved sperm cryosurvival in diluents containing amides versus glycerol in the Przewalski's horse (Equus ferus przewalskii). Cryobiology 68: 205–214 Google Scholar

  167. Rall WF, Fahy GM ( 1985) Ice-free cryopreservation of mouse embryos at -196 degrees C by vitrification. Nature 313: 573–575 Google Scholar

  168. Rao BS, Mahesh YU, Suman K, Charan KV, Lakshmikantan U, Gibence HRW, et al. ( 2011) Meiotic maturation of vitrified immature chousingha (Tetracerus quadricornis) oocytes recovered postmortem. Cryobiology 62: 47–52 Google Scholar

  169. Raphael BL, Loskutoff NM, Huntress SL, Kraemer DC ( 1991) Postmortem recovery, in vitro maturation, and fertilization of klipspringer (Oreotragus oreotragus) ovarian oocytes. J Zoo Wildl Med 22: 115–118 Google Scholar

  170. Reddy NSS, Mohanarao GJ, Atreja SK ( 2010) Effects of adding taurine and trehalose to a tris-based egg yolk extender on buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) sperm quality following cryopreservation. Anim Reprod Sci 119: 183–190 Google Scholar

  171. Reid CE, Hermes R, Blottner S, Goeritz F, Wibbelt G, Walzer C, et al ( 2009) Split-sample comparison of directional and liquid nitrogen vapour freezing method on post-thaw semen quality in white rhinoceroses (Ceratotherium simum simum and Ceratotherium simum cottoni). Theriogenology 71: 275–291 Google Scholar

  172. Robeck TR, Steinman KJ, Greenwell M, Ramirez K, Van Bonn W, Yoshioka M, et al. ( 2009) Seasonality, estrous cycle characterization, estrus synchronization, semen cryopreservation, and artificial insemination in the Pacific white-sided dolphin (Lagenorhynchus obliquidens). Reproduction 138: 391–405 Google Scholar

  173. Robeck TR, Steinman KJ, Montano GA, Katsumata E, Osborn S, Dalton L, et al. ( 2010) Deep intra-uterine artificial inseminations using cryopreserved spermatozoa in beluga (Delphinapterus leucas). Theriogenology 74: 989–1001 Google Scholar

  174. Robeck TR, Gearhart SA, Steinman KJ, Katsumata E, Loureiro JD, O'Brien JK ( 2011) In vitro sperm characterization and development of a sperm cryopreservation method using directional solidification in the killer whale (Orcinus orca). Theriogenology 76: 267–279 Google Scholar

  175. Rodger JC, Paris DB, Czarny NA, Harris MS, Molinia FC, Taggart DA, et al. ( 2009) Artificial insemination in marsupials. Theriogenology 71: 176–189 Google Scholar

  176. Rondinini C, Rodrigues ASL, Boitani L ( 2011) The key elements of a comprehensive global mammal conservation strategy. Phil Trans R Soc B 366: 2591–2597 Google Scholar

  177. Rota A, Panzani D, Sabatini C, Camillo F ( 2012) Donkey jack (Equus asinus) semen cryopreservation: Studies of seminal parameters, post breeding inflammatory response, and fertility in donkey jennies. Theriogenology 78: 1846–1854 Google Scholar

  178. Roussel JD, Austin CR ( 1967) Preservation of primate spermatozoa by freezing. J Reprod Fertil 13: 333–335 Google Scholar

  179. Rush EM, Jewell M, Cooper C, Garcia A, Tomsett G, Loskutoff NM ( 1997). Effect of cryoprotectant and thawing method for cryopreserving epididymal sperm from impala (Aepyceros melampus) for in vitro fertilization. Theriogenology 47: 406 Google Scholar

  180. Sakagami N, Yamamoto T, Akiyama K, Nakazawa Y, Kojima N, Nishida K, et al. ( 2010) Cryopreservation of Iberian pig spermatozoa. Comparison of different freezing extenders based on post-thaw sperm quality. J Reprod Dev 56: 279–284 Google Scholar

  181. Sánchez-Partida LG, Simerly CR, Ramalho-Santos J ( 2008) Freeze-dried primate sperm retains early reproductive potential after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril 89: 742– 745 Google Scholar

  182. Sankai T, Terao K, Yanagimachi R, Cho F, Yoshikawa Y ( 1994) Cryopreservation of spermatozoa from cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis). J Reprod Fertil 101: 273–278 Google Scholar

  183. Santiago-Moreno J, Castaño C, Toledano-Díaz A, Esteso MC, López-Sebastián A, Guerra R, et al. ( 2013) Cryopreservation of aoudad (Ammotragus lervia sahariensis) sperm obtained by transrectal ultrasound-guided massage of the accessory sex glands and electroejaculation. Theriogenology 79: 383–391 Google Scholar

  184. Santiago-Moreno J, Esteso MC, Pradiee J, Castaño C, Toledano-Diaz A, O'Brien E, et al. ( 2016) Giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) sperm morphometry and function after repeated freezing and thawing. Andrologia 48: 470–474 Google Scholar

  185. Santos AC, Viana DC, Bertassoli BM, Oliveira GB, Oliveira DM, Bezerra FVF, et al. ( 2015) Characterization of the estrous cycle in Galea spixii (Wagler, 1831). Pesq Vet Bras 35: 89–94 Google Scholar

  186. Saragusty J, Gacitua H, King R, Arav A ( 2006) Post-mortem semen cryopreservation and characterization in two different endangered gazelle species (Gazella gazella and Gazella dorcas) and one subspecies (Gazella gazelle acaiae). Theriogenology 66: 775–784 Google Scholar

  187. Saragusty J, Hildebrandt TB, Behr B, Knieriem A, Kruse J, Hermes R ( 2009) Successful cryopreservation of Asian elephant (Elephas maximus) spermatozoa. Anim Reprod Sci 115: 255– 266 Google Scholar

  188. Saragusty J, Hildebrandt TB, Bouts T, Göritz F, Hermes R ( 2010a) Collection and preservation of pygmy hippopotamus (Choeropsis liberiensis) semen. Theriogenology 74: 652–657 Google Scholar

  189. Saragusty J, Walzer C, Petit T, Stalder G, Horowitz I, Hermes R ( 2010b) Cooling and freezing of epididymal sperm in the common hippopotamus (Hippopotamus amphibius). Theriogenology 74: 1256–1263 Google Scholar

  190. Saragusty J, Prieto MT, Courtiol A, Potier R, Göritz F, Hildebrandt TB, Hermes R (2015) Sperm rescue in wild African elephants. Reprod Fertil Dev 28: A–J Google Scholar

  191. Sarsaifi K, Rosnina YA, riff MO, Wahid H, Hani H, Yimer N, et al. ( 2013) Effect of semen collection methods on the quality of preand post-thawed Bali cattle (Bos javanicus) spermatozoa. Reprod Dom Anim 48: 1006–1012 Google Scholar

  192. Schiewe MC, Bush M, de Vos V, Brown JL, Wildt DE ( 1991) Semen characteristics, sperm freezing, and endocrine profiles in freeliving wildebeest (Connochaetes taurinus) and greater kudu (Tragelaphus strepsiceros). J Zoo Wildl Med 22: 58–72 Google Scholar

  193. Schnorr J, Oehninger S, Toner J, Hsiu J, Lanzendorf S, Williams R, et al. ( 2002) Functional studies of subcutaneous ovarian transplants in nonhuman primates: Steroidogenesis, endometrial development, ovulation, menstrual patterns and gamete morphology. Hum Reprod 17: 612–619 Google Scholar

  194. Schook MW, Wildt DE, Weiss RB, Wolfe BA, Archibald KE, Pukazhenthi BS ( 2013) Fundamental studies of the reproductive biology of the endangered Persian onager (Equus hemionus onager) result in first wild equid offspring from artificial insemination. Biol Reprod 89: 1–13 Google Scholar

  195. Ševelová H, Lopatářová M ( 2012) Closed system for bovine oocyte vitrification. Acta Vet Brno 81: 201–206 Google Scholar

  196. Shiomi HH, Pinho RO, Lima DMA, Siqueira JB, Santos MCR, Costa EV, et al. ( 2015) Cryopreservation of piau-breed wild boar sperm: Assessment of cooling curves and centrifugation regimes. Reprod Domestic Anim 50: 545–553 Google Scholar

  197. Si W, Zheng P, Tang X, He X, Wang H, Bavister BD, et al. ( 2000) Cryopreservation of rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta) spermatozoa and their functional assessment by in vitro fertilization. Cryobiology 41: 232–240 Google Scholar

  198. Si W, Hildebrandt TB, Reid C, Krieg R, Ji W, Fassbender M, et al. ( 2006) The successful double cryopreservation of rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) semen in large volume using the directional freezing technique with reduced concentration of cryoprotectant. Theriogenology 65: 788–798 Google Scholar

  199. Si W, Lu Y, He X, Ji S, Niu Y, Tan T, Ji W ( 2010) Directional freezing as an alternative method for cryopreserving rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta) sperm. Theriogenology 74: 1431–1438 Google Scholar

  200. Silva MA, Peixoto GCX, Santos EAA, Castelo TS, Oliveira MF, Silva AR ( 2011) Recovery and cryopreservation of epididymal sperm from agouti (Dasiprocta aguti) using powdered coconut water (ACP-109c) and Tris extenders. Theriogenology 76: 1084–1089 Google Scholar

  201. Silva MA, Peixoto GCX, Sousa PC, Bezerra FSB, Simão BR, Bezerra ACDS, et al. (2012) Interactions between straw size and thawing rates on the cryopreservation of agouti (Dasyprocta aguti) epididymal sperm. Reprod Domestic Anim 47: e4–e6 Google Scholar

  202. Silva AR, Lima GL, Peixoto GCX, Souza ALP ( 2016) Cryopreservation in mammalian conservation biology: Current applications and potential utility. Research and Reports in Biodiversity Studies 4: 1–8 Google Scholar

  203. Souza ALP, Lima GL, Peixoto GCX, Silva AM, Oliveira MF, Silva AR ( 2016) Use of Aloe vera-based extender for chilling and freezing collared peccary (Pecari tajacu) semen. Theriogenology 85: 1432–1438 Google Scholar

  204. Sparman ML, Ramsey CM, Thomas CM, Mitalpov SM, Fanton JW, Maginnis GM, et al. ( 2007) Evaluation of the vervet (Clorocebus aethiops) as a model for the assisted reproductive technologies. Am J Primatol 69: 917–929 Google Scholar

  205. Stewart JL, Shipley CF, Katich AS, Po E, Ellerbrock RE, Lima FS, et al. ( 2016) Cryopreservation of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) semen using soybean-, liposome-, and egg yolkbased extenders. Anim Reprod Sci 171: 7–16 Google Scholar

  206. Stoops MA, Atkinson MW, Blumer ES, Campbell MK, Roth TL ( 2010) Semen cryopreservation in the Indian rhinoceros (Rhinoceros unicornis). Theriogenology 73: 1104–1115 Google Scholar

  207. Strand J, Ragborg MM, Pedersen HS, Kristensen TN, Pertoldi C, Callesen H (2016) Effects of post-mortem storage conditions of bovine epididymides on sperm characteristics: investigating a tool for preservation of sperm from endangered species. Conserv Physiol 4 Google Scholar

  208. Taggart DA, Leigh CM, Steele VR, Breed WG, Temple-Smith PD, Phelan J ( 1996) Effect of cooling and cryopreservation on sperm motility and morphology of several species of marsupial. Reprod Fertil Dev 8: 673–679 Google Scholar

  209. Takasu M, Morita N, Tajima S, Almunia J, Maeda M, Kamiguchi T ( 2016) Cryopreservation of lar gibbon semen collected by manual stimulation. Primates 57: 303–307 Google Scholar

  210. Thiangtum K, Swanson WF, Howard J, Tunwattana W, Tongthainan D, Wichasilpa W, et al. ( 2006) Assessment of basic seminal characteristics, sperm cryopreservation and heterologous in vitro fertilisation in the fishing cat (Prionailurus viverrinus). Reprod Fertil Dev 18: 373–382 Google Scholar

  211. Thongtip N, Saikhun J, Damyang M, Mahasawangkul S, Suthunmapinata P, Yindee M, et al. ( 2004) Evaluation of postthaw Asian elephant (Elephas maximus) spermatozoa using flow cytometry: The effects of extender and cryoprotectant. Theriogenology 62: 748–760 Google Scholar

  212. Thurston LM, Watson PF, Holt WV (2002) Semen cryopreservation: A genetic explanation for species and individual variation? CryoLetters 23: 255–262 Google Scholar

  213. Thuwanut P, Thongpakdee A, Sommanustweechai A, Siriaroonrat B, Chatdarong K ( 2012) A case report concerning male gametes rescued from a Siamese eld's deer (rucervus eldii siamensis): Post-thawed testicular and epididymal sperm quality and heterologous zona pellucida binding ability. J Vet Med Sci 75: 123–125 Google Scholar

  214. Thuwanut P, Srisuwatanasagul S, Wongbandue G, Tanpradit N, Thongpakdee A, Tongthainan D, et al. ( 2013) Sperm quality and the morphology of cryopreserved testicular tissues recovered post-mortem from diverse wild species. Cryobiology 67: 244–247 Google Scholar

  215. Tovar H, Navarrete F, Rodrıguez L ( 2008) Cold storage of biopsies from wild endangered native Chilean species in field conditions and subsequent isolation of primary culture cell lines. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 44: 309–320 Google Scholar

  216. Trimeche A, Renard P, Tainturier D ( 1998) A procedure for poitou jackass sperm cryopreservation. Theriogenology 50: 793–806 Google Scholar

  217. Vieira LA, Gadea J, Garcia-Vázquez FA, Avilés-López K, Matás C ( 2013) Equine spermatozoa stored in the epididymis for up to 96 h at 4°C can be successfully cryopreserved and maintain their fertilization capacity. Anim Reprod Sci 136: 280–288 Google Scholar

  218. Ward MA, Kaneko T, Kusakabe H, Biggers JD, Whittingham DG, Yanagimachi R ( 2003) Long-term preservation of mouse spermatozoa after freeze-drying and freezing without cryoprotection. Biol Reprod 69: 2100–2108 Google Scholar

  219. Watanabe H, Tateno H, Kusakabe H, Matsuoka T, Kamiguchi Y, Fujise Y, et al. ( 2007) Fertilizability and chromosomal integrity of frozen-thawed Bryde's whale (Balaenoptera edeni) spermatozoa intracytoplasmically injected into mouse oocytes. Zygote 15: 9–14 Google Scholar

  220. Waters CN, Zalasiewicz J, Summerhayes C, Barnosky AD, Poirier C, Gałuszka A, et al. ( 2016) The anthropocene is functionally and stratigraphically distinct from the holocene. Science 351: 137–148 Google Scholar

  221. Watson R, Lantema J, Garcia A, Cooper C, Rush EM, Tomsett G, Loskutoff NM ( 1997) Freezing resistances of epididymal sperm from waterbuck, greater kudu and warthog using glycerol, ethanediol or dimethyl sulfoxide. Theriogenology 47: 411 Google Scholar

  222. Wildt DE ( 2000) Genome resource banking for wildlife research, management, and conservation. ILAR J 41: 228–234 Google Scholar

  223. Wright LI, Tregenza T, Hosken DJ ( 2008) Inbreeding, inbreeding depression and extinction. Conserv Genet 9: 833–843 Google Scholar

  224. WWF (2016) Living planet report 2016. Risk and resilience in a new era. WWF International, Gland, Switzerland Google Scholar

  225. Yeoman RR, Gerami-Naini B, Mitalipov S, Nusser KD, Widmann-Browning AA, Wolf DP ( 2001) Cryoloop vitrification yields superior survival of rhesus monkey blastocysts. Hum Reprod 16: 1965–1969 Google Scholar

  226. Yokonishi T, Sato T, Komeya M, Katagiri K, Kubota Y, Nakabayashi K, et al. ( 2014) Offspring production with sperm grown in vitro from cryopreserved testis tissues. Nat Commun 5: 1–6 Google Scholar

  227. Younis AI, Rooks B, Khan S, Gould KG ( 1998) The effects of antifreeze peptide III (AFP) and insulin transferrin selenium (ITS) on cryopreservation of chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) spermatozoa. J Androl 19: 207–214 Google Scholar

  228. Zindl C, Asa C, Günzel-Apel AR ( 2006) Influence of cooling rates and addition of equex pasta on cooled and frozen-thawed semen of generic gray (Canis lupus) and mexican gray wolves (C. I. baileyi). Theriogenology 66: 1797–1802 Google Scholar

© 2018 Zoological Society of Japan
Sebastian J. Charlton, Mikkel B. Nielsen, Carina R. Pedersen, Lisette Thomsen, Mads P. Kristjansen, Thomas B. Sørensen, Cino Pertoldi, and Julie Strand "Strong Heterogeneity in Advances in Cryopreservation Techniques in the Mammalian Orders," Zoological Science 35(1), 1-22, (1 January 2018). https://doi.org/10.2108/zs170037
Received: 2 March 2017; Accepted: 1 August 2017; Published: 1 January 2018
JOURNAL ARTICLE
22 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top