Open Access
1 April 2018 Description of a New Subfamily, Astrocloninae (Ophiuroidea: Euryalida: Gorgonocephalidae), Based on Molecular Phylogeny and Morphological Observations
Masanori Okanishi, Toshihiko Fujita
Author Affiliations +

Previous phylogenetic studies of the family Gorgonocephalidae (brittle stars and basket stars) have identified three subfamilies, Astrotominae, Astrothamninae, and Gorgonocephalinae. The genus Astroclon was tentatively assigned to the subfamily Astrothamninae in previous studies, but its morphology is enigmatic and molecular data of the genus was insufficient. Therefore, the systematic position of Astroclon required confirmation to reconstruct the accurate systematics of the Euryalida. In the present study, we sought to clarify the subfamilial classification in the family Gorgonocephalidae (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea: Euryalida). We revisited molecular phylogenetics of the Gorgonocephalidae including Astroclon and the major taxa in the family. The molecular analysis supported monophyly of the two species of Astroclon and its clear separation from Astrothamninae. The two Astroclon species were also distinguished from the other two subfamilies, Astrotominae and Gorgonocephalinae. Astroclon and three other subfamilies were divided in the basal position of the Gorgonocephalidae, and were assigned to subfamilies. A new subfamily, Astrocloninae was monotypically established for Astroclon in addition to the previous three subfamilies. Morphology of the first ventral arm plates and tentacle pores also supported distinctiveness of the new subfamily.


Gorgonocephalidae is the largest family of the order Euryalida and currently includes 34 genera (Döderlein, 1927; Fell, 1960; Okanishi and Fujita, 2013; Okanishi, 2016). In a recent molecular study, the family was identified as monophyletic with three recognized subfamilies, Astrotominae, Gorgonocephalinae, and Astrothamninae (Okanishi and Fujita, 2013). The subfamilies were distinguished by the morphology of madreporites, teeth, and genital slits. The presence/absence of supplementary oral plates were also emphasized by Matsumoto (1917), however, the plates have only been observed for Astrochele pacifica (Mortensen, 1933), Gorgonocephalus arcticus, Astrochele sp., and Astrotoma sp. (Ezhova et al., 2016). Observation of supplementary oral plates requires destructive dissection of surficial skins and/or external ossicles in the oral area; thus, no other work has recorded the nature of this structure. As a result, Okanishi and Fujita (2013) did not take this character into account in their systematics.

The enigmatic and rare genus Astroclon was monotypically established for Astroclon propugnatoris Lyman, 1879 in Gorgonocephalidae by Lyman (1879) and later another species A. suensoni Mortensen, 1911 was described (Mortensen, 1911). The former species has been recorded from Indonesia, Philippines, and Japan in the literature (Lyman, 1879; Mortensen, 1933; Murakami, 1944; Guille, 1981; Irimura and Kubodera, 1998; Okanishi et al., 2011) and the latter has been recorded from Australia and Japan (Mortensen, 1911, 1933; Baker, 1980). In the current systematics, Astroclon is classified as Astrothamninae in having a madreporite on the disc periphery as well as slit-shaped genital slits, and by the absence of oral papillae (Okanishi and Fujita, 2013).

Nuclear 28S rRNA, 18S rRNA, and mitochondrial 16S rRNA genes of Astroclon propugnatoris were sequenced by Okanishi et al. (2011). The phylogenetic tree of 49 species of Euryalida, including 27 gorgonocephalid species, showed A. propugnatoris was clearly included in Gorgonocephalidae. However, its exact systematic position was unclear (Okanishi et al., 2011). Okanishi and Fujita (2013) analyzed the phylogeny of 83 species of Euryalida including 38 gorgonocephalid species, mainly using mitochondrial COI, but A. propugnatoris was not included in this analysis (Okanishi and Fujita, 2013) and no material for sequencing of A. suensoni has been obtained.

In this study, to confirm the systematic position of the genus Astroclon within the Gorgonocephalidae, we obtained nuclear 18S rRNA, and mitochondrial COI and 16S sequences of a fresh specimen of A. suensoni collected from central Japan for the phylogenetic analysis. We also review important morphological characters including supplementary oral plates of many gorgonocephalid species to compare them with those of other Astroclon species.

Fig. 1.

Bayesian tree based on a partitioned analysis of the nuclear 18S rRNA, and mitochondrial COI and 16S rRNA and genes (2889 bp). Ophiopholis aculeata (Ophintegrida; Ophiactidae), Astrobrachion constrictum (Euryalidae, Euryalinae), Astrocharis monospinosa (Euryalidae, Astrocharinae), Ophiocreas spinulosus (Euryalidae, Asteroschematinae) and Asteronyx loveni and Astrodia tenuispina (Asteronychidae) were used as the outgroup. Support values for each node are shown by Bayesian posterior probabilities and maximum likelihood bootstrap values. Nodes in the phylogenetic trees were considered as supported when BPP and bootstrap values were larger than 0.98 and 85%, respectively. BPP values lower than 0.97 and bootstrap lower than 74% for each node were considered not significant and shown by a hyphen. Support value of a clade of Astroclon was shown since it is discussed in the text. Numerals (S1–S7) in circles and a star at nodes refer to the clade number discussed in the text. Morphology was observed in this study for species appended with as asterisks.



Sample collections for molecular analysis

One specimen of Astroclon suensoni was collected by a fishing line, off Kashino-zaki, Kushimoto, Wakayama, central Japan, 100–140 m depth, 9 January 2014 (NSMT E-10717), and an arm tip specimen of Astroclon propugnatoris was collected by ROV Hakuyo 2000 of M/S Shinsei-maru (Fukada Salvage and Marine Works Co. Ltd.), off Tarama-jima Island, Okinawa, southwestern Japan, 24°29.72′N, 124°33.78′E. 284–290 m depth, 8 March, 2005 (NSMT E-6274). These two specimens were directly immersed in 99% ethanol for molecular analysis.

DNA extraction, PCR amplification, and DNA sequencing

We sequenced nuclear 18S rRNA and mitochondrial COI and 16S rRNA genes for Astroclon suensoni and mitochondrial COI for Astroclon propugnatoris. The method of DNA extraction and PCR parameters followed that by Okanishi and Fujita (2013). Total DNA solution of Astroclon was diluted by distilled water 50 times for PCR of 18S rRNA, 100 times for COI and 16S rRNA. Primer sets of SSU001 (5′-GCTTGTCTTAAAGACTAAGCCATGC-3′) and SSU002 (5′-CCGTGTTGAGTCAAATTAAGCCGC-3′) (Okanishi et al., 2011) was used for PCR of 18S rRNA, COI005 (5′-TTAGGTTAAHWAAACCAVYTKCCTTCAAAG-3′) and COI008 (5′-CCDTANGMDATCATDGCRTACATCATTCC-3′) (Okanishi and Fujita, 2013) was used for PCR of COI, and 16Sar (5′-CGCCTGTTTATCAAAAACAT-3′) and16Sbr (5′-CCGGTCTGAACTCAGATCACGT-3′) (Palumbi, 1996) was used for PCR of 16S rRNA. The PCR products were separated from excess primers and oligonucleotides using Exo-SAP-IT (GE Healthcare), following the manufacturer's protocol. All samples were sequenced bidirectionally and sequence products were run on a 3730xI DNA Analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The accession numbers of DNA Data Bank of Japan (DDBJ) of the Astroclon are LC272069 (18S rRNA), LC272067 (COI), and LC272070 (16S rRNA) for A. suensoni, and LC272068 (COI) for A. propugnatoris.

Table 1.

Sampling locality and voucher depository of the examined specimens. Asterisks indicate type species.


Phylogenetic analysis

We analyzed sequences of both species of Astroclon, with the sequence data of other 38 gorgonocephalid species obtained by Okanishi and Fujita (2013). For outgroups, we selected five euryalid species with the shortest genetic distance from Gorgonocephalidae, two from Asteronychidae and three from Euryalidae, to avoid long branch attraction (Bergsten, 2005; Okanishi and Fujita, 2013). Additionally, we selected Ophiopholis aculeata (Ophintegrida; Ophiactidae) as a representative of Ophintegrida. This species is also used in previous molecular phylogeny (Okanishi and Fujita, 2013) with sequences of 18S rRNA, COI, and 16S rRNA genes.

All sequences were aligned using the Clustal W algorithm in MEGA5 (Thompson et al., 1994; Tamura et al., 2011). Gene regions where the alignment was ambiguous, including ribosomal loops, were excluded by eye, and all missing sequences were scored as gaps. Overall average of substitution rate was computed using MEGA5 according to the Kimura 2-parameter model (Kimura, 1980) to compare the evolutionary rate of each gene. The Kimura 2 parameter model (Kimura, 1980) with a gamma distribution was selected as best-fit model of 18S rRNA gene, and general time reversible model (GTR; Yang, 1994a) assumed to be invariable (I; Hasegawa et al., 1985) with a gamma distribution approximated by discrete categories (γ Yang, 1994b) being selected as the best-fit model of nucleotide substitution with COI and 16S rRNA genes, by using the “Find best fit models” option of MEGA5. BioEdit ver. (Hall, 1999) and Seaview ver. 4.3.0 (Gouy et al., 2010) were used in preparing the data matrices in FASTA and PHYLIP format, respectively. Seaview ver. 4.3.0 was also used in concatenating sequences of three gene sequences. Tree View for Win 16 (Page, 1996) was used in exploring tree files, in preparing NEWICK format and exploring alternative tree topologies. The phylogenetic tree was constructed with MrBayes ver. 3.1.2 (Ronquist and Huelsenbeck, 2003) to obtain Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP) and RAxML ver. 8.1.20 (Stamatakis, 2014) for maximum likelihood analysis (ML) to obtain bootstrap support values. The three gene sequences were placed in separate partitions. We set parameters in MrBayes as follows; two substitution types (nst = 2, statefreqpr = fixed; K2P) for 18S rRNA and six substitution types (nst = 6; GTR) for COI and 16S rRNA were employed; rate variation across sites was modeled using a gamma distribution (rate = gamma) for 18S rRNA and using a gamma distribution with a proportion of sites being invariant (rate = invgamma) for COI and16S rRNA; the shape, proportion of invariable sites, state frequency, and substitution rate parameters were estimated for each partition separately. The Markov-Chain Monte-Carlo (MCMC) process was run with four chains for 4,000,000 generations, with trees being sampled every 100 generations. The first 10,000 trees were discarded as burn-in. Data sets were partitioned by gene region for the maximum likelihood analysis to allow for separate optimization per-site substitution rates. The best-supported likelihood tree was found by performing 1000 replications. Nodes in the phylogenetic trees were considered as supported if BPP values were larger than 0.98 and bootstrap value larger than 85%. BPP values lower than 0.97 and bootstrap lower than 74% for each node were considered as not significant (Fig. 1).

Morphological observation

For morphological comparison between the two species of Astroclon (A. propugnatoris and A. suensoni) and other gorgonocephalids, 19 species in 16 genera covering the three subfamilies of Gorgonocephalidae were examined (Table 1). Specimens identifiable as the type genera of the three subfamilies, Astrothamnus, Astrotoma, and Gorgonocephalus, were included. From Astrothamninae and Astrotominae, we examined one or more species from each of the five genera (Astrothamnus, Astrothrombus, Astrocrius, Astrohamma, and Astrotoma). Since we did not obtain any dissectable specimens of Astrotoma drachi and A. agassizii (which were only used for obtaining molecular data), we examined a specimen of A. manilense as a representative of this genus; according to O'Hara and Harding (2014), A. drachi and A. manilense are potentially synonymous. In Gorgonocephalinae, some genera were recovered to be non-monophyletic (Okanishi and Fujita, 2013). Therefore, we selected species so that they represent all the gorgonocephaline subclades recognized by molecular analysis in this study (see Fig. 1, nodes S1–S7). We examined one species of Astrochele, one species of Astrodendrum, and two species of Gorgonocephalus from clade S1, and one species each from clades S2–S7 (Astrosierra from S2, Asterporpa from S3, Astrothorax from S4, Astrodendrum S5, Astroboa from S6, Astroglymma from S7). Because Asteroporpa muricatopatella and three species of Astrocladus formed a clade despite with the relatively lower support value of ML, we selected Astrocladus coniferus as a representative of this species group (see Fig. 1, node marked by a star).

Fig. 2.

Oral views of disc. Skins and external ossicles were partly removed. (A) Astroclon suensoni (NSMT E-10755); (B) Astrothamnus echinaceus (NSMT E-2207-A); (C) Astrothrombus chrysanthi (NSMT E-6715); (D) Astrotoma manilense (NSMT E-3148); (E) Gorgonocephalus eucnemis (NSMT E-1563); (F) Astrosierra amblyconus (NSMT E-1943); (G) Asteroporpa annulata (NSMT E-1767); (H) Astrochlamys bruneus (NSMT E-697). Black arrow heads indicate supplementary oral plates. Abbreviations: AP, adoral plate; EO, external ossicle; LAP, lateral arm plate; OP, oral plate; VAP, ventral arm plate.


In morphological observation, we focused on supplementary oral plates, adoral plates, and the first ventral arm plates, all recognized as diagnostic characters of subfamilies in Gorgonocephalidae since Matsumoto (1917). The presence/absence of supplementary oral plates have been observed only for Astrocrius sobrina (Astrotominae) (Matsumoto, 1917). Adoral plates and the first ventral arm plates have been observed for a limited number of species (e.g., Astrochele pacifica, Mortensen, 1933), but never for Astroclon. We also examined the following external characters used in generic diagnoses in Gorgonocephalidae: presence/absence of tubercles, spines, special calcareous plates, and concentric transverse ridges on disc; maximum number of arm spines; maximum numbers of secondary teeth on hooklets; and patterns of arm branching (see Matsumoto, 1917; Döderlein, 1927; Mortensen, 1933; Fell, 1960; Turner and Boucher, 2010).

To observe the supplementary oral plates, adoral plates, and the first ventral arm plates, skin and external ossicles were removed using domestic bleach (~5% sodium hypochlorite solution). The aboral plates and the first ventral arm plates were isolated, washed in deionized water, observed and photographed with Keyence VHX 600. The terms used in this study to describe brittle stars follow Matsumoto (1917), Martynov (2010), Stöhr et al. (2012), Okanishi and Fujita (2013), and Okanishi (2016). All the specimens with isolated ossicles are deposited in the National Museum of Nature and Science, Japan (NSMT).

Table 2.

Morphological characters of examined species. Abbreviations: AS, arm spine; SOP, supplementary oral plate; SCP, special calcareous plate; ST, secondary teeth of hooklet; VAP, ventral arm plate. Adoral plates are not included because no morphological differences were observed between species.



Molecular phylogeny

After removal of ambiguously aligned sites, we were left with 949 bp of 18S rRNA, 1511 bp of COI, and 429 bp of 16S rRNA. Overall averages of nucleotide substitution rates within nuclear 18S rRNA, mitochondrial COI and 16S rRNA genes were 0.019, 0.261, and 0.186, respectively.

The Bayesian tree of concatenated sequences of the three genes, 18S rRNA, COI, and 16S rRNA is shown in Fig 1. The ML tree also showed the same topology. Both Bayesian and ML analyses supported monophyly of Gorgonocephalidae (Fig. 1, node 1, bootstrap value 85%, BPP 1.00).

Two species of Astroclon formed a clade (Fig. 1, node 2, bootstrap 99%, BPP 1.00). The Gorgonocephalidae clade was divided into the following four clades: two species of Astroclon (Fig. 1, node 2, bootstrap 99%, BPP 1.00), Astrothamninae (Fig. 1, node 3, bootstrap 100%, BPP 1.00), Astrotominae (Fig. 1, node 4, bootstrap 99%, BPP 1.00), and Gorgonocephalinae (Fig. 1, node 5, bootstrap 88%, BPP 1.00). In Gorgonocephalinae, monophyly of seven subclades were well supported (Fig. 1, node S1–S7, bootstrap 85–100%, BPP 1.00), whereas support value of a subclade of three species of Astrocladus and A. muricatopatella was lower in our ML analysis (Fig. 1, node star).

Morphological observation

Supplementary oral plates were present on 19 species including Astroclon but were lacking on Asteroporpa annulata Örsted and Lütken, 1856 (in Lütken, 1856) and Schizostella sp. (Fig. 2; Table 2).

Fig. 3.

Lateral view of first ventral arm plate. (A) Astroclon suensoni (NSMT E-10755); (B) Astrothamnus echinaceus (NSMT E-2207-A); (C) Astrotoma manilense (NSMT E-3148); (D) Astroglymma sculptum (NSMT E-10718). Orientations: top oral side and bottom aboral side. Arc indicates wedge-like structure.


Fig. 4.

Oral view of basal portion of an arm. (A) Astroclon propugnatoris (NSMT E-3564); (B) Astrothamnus ehchinaceus (NSMT E-2207-A); (C) Astrotoma manilense (NSMT E-3148); (D) and Gorgonocephalus eucnemis (NSMT E-1563). (A) large pits present adjacent to tentacle sheath; (B–D) no pits adjacent to the sheath. Abbreviation: TS, tentacle sheath.


Adoral plates were flat and plate-shaped for all examined species, with no distinct morphological differences being confirmed between Astroclon and the other gorgonocephalids. However, the first ventral arm plates were different in shape between Astroclon and the other gorgonocephalids. The oral surface of the first ventral arm plates of Astroclon propugnatoris (Fig. 3A) and A. suensoni were polygonal and flat, with the wedge-like projections protruding from the aboral surface (Fig. 3A). The first ventral arm plates of the other 19 gorgonocephalid species were plate-shaped, and both oral and aboral surfaces were polygonal and flat with no projections (Fig. 3B–D; Table 2).

Tentacle pores of Astroclon propugnatoris and A. suensoni had a large pit beside tentacle sheath (Fig. 4A), while no such pit was observed for the other 19 gorgonocephalid species (Fig. 4B–D).

We observed no distinctive features for Astroclon in the six external characters used as generic diagnoses in Gorgonocephalidae: presence/absence of tubercles, spines; presence/absence of special calcareous plates; presence/absence of concentric transverse ridges on disc; maximum number of arm spines; maximum number of secondary teeth on hooklets; and patterns of arm branching (Table 2).


In the molecular tree of Okanishi and Fujita (2013), three clades were recognized in Gorgonocephalidae and classified as three subfamilies, Astrothamninae (including Astroclon), Astrotominae, and Gorgonocephalinae. In the present study, the two species of Astroclon were distinctly separated from the other genera of Astrothamninae and formed a clade (Fig. 1). The Astroclon was also separated from Astrotominae and Gorgonocephalinae clades, and monophyly of the two subfamilies and Astrothamninae, except Astroclon, was well supported. The Astroclon and the three subfamily clades were diverged near the base of the family Gorgonocephalidae. Branch length between the Astroclon and Astrothamninae was longer than those between Astrothamninae and Astrotominae, and between Astrothamninae and Gorgonocephalinae. These molecular evidences suggest that Astroclon is well genetically separated from other three subfamilies and the systematic position of Astroclon should be elevated to the same rank as the three subfamilies.

By our morphological observations, previously used taxonomic characters by Matsumoto (1917) did not distinguish the three subfamilial clades and Astroclon recognized by our molecular analysis. Presence/absence of supplementary oral plate was considered to distinguish Matsumoto (1917)'s Gorgonocephalinae (=current Gorgonocephalinae) and Astrotominae (= current Astrotominae + Astrothamninae + Astroclon) in Gorgonocephalidae; however, they were absent only in Asteroporpa annulata and Schizostella sp. of Gorgonocephalinae. The six generic characters mentioned above also did not distinguish the subfamilial clades (Table 2). Therefore, traditionally known morphological characters have been confirmed unavailable for subfamilial taxonomy of Gorgonocephalidae.

Table 3.

Diagnostic characters distinguishing four subfamilies of Gorgonocephalidae in the proposed classification.


The Astroclon was originally classified in Astrothamninae which shared the following morphological characters: a madreporite located on periphery disc, slit-like genital slits, and absence of oral papillae (Okanishi and Fujita, 2013). Our morphological observations newly showed that Astroclon has a unique wedge-shaped projection on the first ventral arm plate (Fig. 3A) while the other examined genera have no such projections (Fig. 3B–D; Table 2), and has large pits adjacent to tentacle sheath (Fig. 4A) which are also lacking in the other examined genera (Fig. 4B–D). Although the shapes of the first ventral arm plates have not been described previously, our literature surveys for descriptions of tentacle pores of all gorgonocephalid species found that large pits were only possessed by Astroclon in Gorgonocephalidae (Linnaeus, 1758; Retzius, 1783; Lamarck, 1816; Leach, 1819; Risso, 1826; Müller and Troschel, 1842; Duchassaing, 1850; Lütken, 1856; Philippi, 1858; Lyman, 1861, 1869, 1874, 1875, 1879; Verrill, 1867, 1876, 1878, 1899; Bell, 1894; Döderlein, 1896, 1898, 1902, 1911, 1927, 1930; Koehler, 1897, 1898, 1904, 1905, 1910, 1912, 1922, 1923, 1930; Lütken and Mortensen, 1899; Benham, 1909; H. L. Clark, 1909, 1911, 1914, 1915, 1938; Mortensen, 1911, 1912, 1933, 1936; Matsumoto, 1912, 1915, 1918; A. H. Clark, 1916, 1919, 1948, 1952; Guille, 1979; Baker, 1980; McKnight, 2000; Okanishi and Fujita, 2011). Astroclon is clearly distinguished morphologically not only from the other genera of Astrothamninae, but also from Astrotominae and Gorgonocephalinae. Therefore, our comprehensive morphological study also supports treating the Astroclon and the three subfamilies as equally ranked.

Combination of the newly found two unique characters, presence/absence of wedge-shaped projections of the first ventral arm plate and pits besides tentacle pore, by our study (Figs. 3, 4), and previously used three subfamilial characters, shapes of oral papillae, position of madreporite, and shape of genital slits, found by Okanishi and Fujita (2013), clearly distinguishes the genus Astroclon from the three subfamilies in Gorgonocephalidae (Table 3). Therefore, these four clades in a multi-branching relationship (Fig. 1) can be classified as four subfamilies with distinct different morphological characters, and we propose a new subfamily, Astrocloninae, monotypic for the genus Astroclon. The systematic position and definition of the new subfamily are as follows:

Order Euryalida Lamarck, 1816
Family Gorgonocephalidae Ljungman, 1867
Subfamily Astrocloninae subfam. nov.

  • Diagnosis. Gorgonocephalids with a madreporite located on disc periphery; slit-shaped genital slits, absence of oral papillae; tentacle pores with large pits and wedgeshaped first ventral arm plates.

  • Type genus. Astroclon Lyman, 1879

  • Other included genera. none.

  • Distribution. Australia: off Broome (Baker, 1980). Indonesia: Arafura Sea (Lyman, 1879), off Manado (Mortensen, 1933). Philippines: off Lubang Islands (Guile, 1981). Japan: off Goto Island (Mortensen, 1911, 1933), East China Sea (Irimura and Kubodera, 1998), off Okinawa Island (Okanishi et al., 2011), off Amami and Kushimoto (this study). The bathymetric range is 158–457 m.

  • Remarks. Astrocloninae is clearly distinguished from the other three subfamilies of Gorgonocephalidae by five morphological characters (Table 3). The monotypic genus Astroclon includes A. propugnatoris Lyman, 1879 (type species) and A. suensoni Mortensen, 1911.


    We wish to express our sincere gratitude to Jennifer M. Olbers of Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife for her critical reading of the manuscript and constructive comments. We thank to Shinsuke Ui of Kushimoto Marine Park Center, Wakayama, who collected and donated a fresh specimen of Astroclon suensoni and to Atsushi Kaneko, Senzo Uchida and Takuo Higashiji of Okinawa Churaumi Aquarium who collected and donated a fresh specimen of an arm tip of Astroclon propugnatoris. Thanks are also extended to Osamu Kitade of Ibaraki University for his assistance in examination and photography of the ossicle with the Keyence VHX 600. This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers 17K07549, 25440226, 22570104 and a grant from the Director-General of National Museum of Nature and Science, for the project, Imaging of threedimensional morphology of marine invertebrate specimens by nondestructive methods and its application to taxonomical researches. This is a contribution to the integrated research project, Geological, biological, and anthropological histories in relation to the Kuroshio Current, of the National Museum of Nature and Science.


    The authors have no competing interests to declare.


    MO performed molecular phylogenetic analysis, reconstruction of molecular tree, morphological observations of specimens. Manuscript including figures and Tables were prepared by MO and brush upped by MO and TF.



    Baker AN ( 1980) Euryalinid Ophiuroidea (Echinodermata) from Australia, New Zealand, and the south-west Pacific Ocean. New Zeal J Zool 7: 11–83 Google Scholar


    Bell FJ ( 1894) On the echinoderms collected during the voyage of H.M.S. Penguin and by H.M.S. Egeria, when surveying Macclesfield Bank. Proc Zool Soc Lond 1894: 392–413 Google Scholar


    Benham WB ( 1909) Echinoderma (Science reports N.Z. Government Trawling Expedition). Rec Cant Mus 1(2): 83–116 Google Scholar


    Bergsten J ( 2005) A review of long-branch attraction. Cladistics 2: 163–193 Google Scholar


    Clark AH ( 1916) One new starfish and five new brittle stars from the Galapagos Islands. Ann Mag Nat Hist 8(18): 115–122 Google Scholar


    Clark AH ( 1919) A new genus and species of multibrachiate ophiuran from the Caribbean Sea. Proc US Natl Mus 54: 637–640 Google Scholar


    Clark AH ( 1948) Two new starfishes and a new brittlestar from Florida and Alabama. Proc Biol Soc Wash 61: 55–66 Google Scholar


    Clark AH ( 1952) Schizostella, a new genus of brittle-star (Gorgonocephalidae). Proc US Natl Mus 102: 451–454 Google Scholar


    Clark HL ( 1909) Notes on some Australian and Indo-Pacific echinoderms. Bull Mus Comp Zool 52: 107–135 Google Scholar


    Clark HL ( 1911) North Pacific ophiurans in the collection of the United States National Museum. Smithson Inst US Natl Mus Bull 75: 1–302 Google Scholar


    Clark HL ( 1914) The echinoderms of the Western Australian Museum. Rec West Aust Mus 1(3): 132–173 Google Scholar


    Clark HL ( 1915) Catalogue of Recent ophiurans. Mem Mus Comp Zool 25(4): 163–376 Google Scholar


    Clark HL ( 1938) Echinoderms from Australia, an account of collections made in 1929 and 1932. Mem Mus Comp Zool Harvard Coll 55: 1–597 Google Scholar


    Döderlein L ( 1896) Bericht über die von Herrn Prof. Semon bei Amboina und Thursday Island gesammelten Ophiuroidea. Denkschr med-naturw Ges Jena 8: 279–300 Google Scholar


    Döderlein L ( 1898) Über einige epizoisch lebende Ophiuroidea. Denkschr med-naturw Ges Jena 5: 483–488. Google Scholar


    Döderlein L ( 1902) Japanische Euryaliden. Zool Anz 25: 320–326 Google Scholar


    Döderlein L ( 1911) Über japanische und andere Euryalae. Abh Bay Akad Wiss 2: 1–123 Google Scholar


    Döderlein L ( 1927) Indopacifische Euryalae. Abh Bay Akad Wiss 31: 1–105 Google Scholar


    Döderlein L ( 1930) Die Ophiuren der deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition. 2. Euryale. Deut Tie-Exped 1898–1899 22(6): 348–396 Google Scholar


    Duchassaing PDM ( 1850) Animaux radiaires des Antilles. Plon Frères, Paris Google Scholar


    Ezhova OA, Malakhov VV, Martynov AV ( 2016) Madreporites of Ophiuroidea: are they phylogenetically informative? Zoomorphology 135: 333–350 Google Scholar


    Fell HB ( 1960) Synoptic key to the genera of Ophiuroidae. Zool Publ Victoria Univ Wellington 26: 1–44 Google Scholar


    Gouy M, Guindon S, Gascuel O ( 2010) Sea View version 4, a multiplatform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building. Mol Biol Evol 27: 4 Google Scholar


    Guille A ( 1979) Astrotoma drachi, nouvelle espéce bathyale d'Ophiuride, Gorgonocephalidae des ïles Philippines. Vie Mili 28(3A–B): 437–442 Google Scholar


    Guille A ( 1981) Echinoderms: Ophiurides. Résultats des Campagnes Musorstom. 1. Philippines. Mém Mus Nat d'Hist Natur 91: 413–456 Google Scholar


    Hall TA ( 1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nuc Acid Symp Ser 41: 95–98 Google Scholar


    Hasegawa M, Kishino H, Yano T ( 1985) Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J Mol Evol 22: 160–174 Google Scholar


    Irimura S, Kubodera T ( 1998) Ophiuroidea in the East China Sea. Mem Nat Sci Mus Tokyo 30: 135–143 Google Scholar


    Kimura M ( 1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16: 111–120 Google Scholar


    Koehler R ( 1897) Echinodermes recueillis par “l'Investigator” dans l'Ocean Indien. I. Les Ophiures de mer profonde. Ann Sci Nat Zool Sér 8 4: 277–372 Google Scholar


    Koheler R ( 1898) Echinodermes recueillis par “l'Investigator” dans l'Ocean Indien. II Les Ophiures Littorales. Bull Scient Fr Belg 31: 55–125 Google Scholar


    Koehler R ( 1904) Ophiures de l'expédition du Siboga. Part 1. Ophiures de mer profonde. Siboga Expeditie 45a: 1–176 Google Scholar


    Koehler R ( 1905) Ophiures de l'expédition du Siboga. Part 2. Ophiures littorales. Siboga Expeditie 45b: 1–140 Google Scholar


    Koehler R ( 1910) Description d'Ophiures nouvelles provenant des dernières campagnes de l'Investigator dans l'Océan Indien. Rec Indian Mus 5(2): 83–88 Google Scholar


    Koehler R ( 1912) Echinodermes (Asteries, Ophiures et Echinides). Deuxième Expèdition Antarctique Française 1908–1910. Masson et cie, Paris, pp 1–277 Google Scholar


    Koehler R ( 1922) Ophiurans of the Philippine Seas and adjacent waters. Smithson Inst US Nat Mus Bull 100(5): 1–486 Google Scholar


    Koehler R ( 1923) Astéries et Ophiures. Furr Zool Res Swedish Antarc Exped 1901–1903 1(1): 3–145 Google Scholar


    Koehler R ( 1930) Ophiures recueillies par le Docteur Th. Mortensen dans les Mers d'Australie et dans l'Archipel Malais. Papers from Dr. Th. Mortensen's Pacific Expedition 1914–16. LIV. Vid Medd Dansk Nat För København 89: 1–295 Google Scholar


    Lamarck JBM ( 1816) Histoire naturelle des animaux sans vertèbres. Tome second, Verdière, Paris Google Scholar


    Leach WE ( 1819) Descriptions des nouvelles espèces d'Animaux découvertes par le vaisseau Isabelle dans un voyage au pôle boréal. J Physiq Chim 88: 462–467 Google Scholar


    Linnaeus C ( 1758) Systema nature per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Editio decima, reformata, Laurentius Salvius, Holmia Google Scholar


    Ljungman A ( 1867) Ophiuroidea viventia huc usque cognita enumerat. Öfver Kongl Vetenskaps-Akad För Stockh 9: 303–336 Google Scholar


    Lütken CF ( 1856) Bidrag til kundskab om Slangestjernerne. II. Oversigt over de vestindiske Ophiurer. Vid Medd Dansk Nat För Kjøbenhavn 1856 7: 1–19 Google Scholar


    Lütken CF, Mortensen T ( 1899) Reports on an exploration off the west coasts of Mexico, Central and Southern America and off the Galapagos Islands. XXV. The Ophiuridae. Mem Mus Comp Zool 23(2): 97–208 Google Scholar


    Lyman T ( 1861) Descriptions of new Ophiuridae. Proc Boston Soc Nat Hist 8: 75–86 Google Scholar


    Lyman T ( 1869) Preliminary report on the Ophiuridae and Astrophytidae dredged in deep water between Cuba and Florida Reef. Bull Mus Comp Zoöl 1: 309–354 Google Scholar


    Lyman T ( 1874) Ophiuridae and Astrophytidae: new and old. Bull Mus Comp Zoöl Harvard Coll 3: 221–272 Google Scholar


    Lyman T ( 1875) Zoological results of the Hassler Expedition. 2. Ophiuridae and Astrophytidae. Illust Catal Mus Comp Zool Harvard Coll 8(2): 1–34 Google Scholar


    Lyman T ( 1879) Ophiuridae and Astrophytidae of the Exploring Voyage of H.M.S. “Challenger,” under Prof. Sir Wyville Thomson, F. R. S.Part II. Bull Mus Comp Zoöl Harvard Coll 6: 17–83 Google Scholar


    Martynov A ( 2010) Reassessment of the classification of the Ophiuroidea (Echinodermata), based on morphological characters. I. General character evaluation and delineation of the families Ophiomyxidae and Ophiacanthidae. Zootaxa 2697: 1–154 Google Scholar


    Matsumoto H ( 1912) About Japanese Astrophytidae. Dobutsgakuzasshi 24(282): 199–206 Google Scholar


    Matsumoto H ( 1915) A new classification of the Ophiuroidea: with description of new genera and species. Proc Acad Nat Sci Philadelphia 68: 43–92 Google Scholar


    Matsumoto H ( 1917) A monograph of Japanese Ophiuroidea, arranged according to a new classification. J Coll Sci Imp Univ Tokyo 38: 1–408 Google Scholar


    Matsumoto H ( 1918) On a collection of ophiurans from Kinkwasan. Annot Zool Jap Tokyo 9: 475–480 Google Scholar


    McKnight DG ( 2000) The marine fauna of New Zealand: basketstars and snake-stars (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea: Euryalinida). Biodivers Mem Nat Inst Water Atmos Res NIWA 115: 1–79 Google Scholar


    Mortensen T ( 1911) Astroclon suensoni n. sp. A new east Asiatic Euryalid. Vid Medd Nat For København 63: 209–212 Google Scholar


    Mortensen T ( 1912) Astrochalcis micropus n.sp. - a new Euryalid from the Philippines. Vid Medd Dansk Nat For, København 63: 257–259 Google Scholar


    Mortensen T ( 1933) Studies of Indo-Pacific euryalids. Vid Medd Dansk Nat För København 96: 1–75 Google Scholar


    Mortensen T ( 1936) Echinoidea and Ophiuroidea. Discover Rep 12: 199–348 Google Scholar


    Müller J, Troschel FH ( 1842) System der Asteriden. Friedrich Vieweg und Sohn, Braunschweig Google Scholar


    Murakami S ( 1944) Report on the ophiurans from off Ogasawara Islands and from off the Yaéyama Group, Nippon. J Dep Agri Kyūsyū Imp Univ 7: 235–257 Google Scholar


    O'Hara T, Harding C ( 2014) A new species of Sigsbeia and additional records of ophiurans from the Great Australian Bight. Mem Mus Vict 72: 131–140 Google Scholar


    Okanishi M, Fujita T ( 2011) Two new species of the subgenus Asteroporpa (Asteromoana) (Ophiuroidea: Euryalida: Gorgoncephalidae) from Japan. Zootaxa 2751: 25–39 Google Scholar


    Okanishi M, O'Hara T, Fujita T ( 2011) Molecular phylogeny of the order Euryalida (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea), based on mitochondrial and nuclear ribosomal genes. Mol Phylogenet Evol 61: 392–399 Google Scholar


    Okanishi M, Fujita T ( 2013) Molecular phylogeny based on increased number of species and genes revealed more robust family-level systematics of the order Euryalida (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea). Mol Phylogenet Evol 69: 566–580 Google Scholar


    Okanishi M ( 2016) Euryalida. In “AccessScience” McGraw-Hill Education,  Google Scholar


    Page RD ( 1996) Tree View: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Comput Appl Biosci 12: 2 Google Scholar


    Palumbi SR ( 1996) Nucleic acids II: the polymerase chain reaction. In “Molecular Systematics, 2nd ed” Ed by D Hillis, C Moritz, B Mable, Sinauer Press, pp 205–247 Google Scholar


    Philippi A ( 1858) Beschreibungen einiger neuer Seesterne aus dem Meere von Chiloe. Arch Naturgesch 24(1): 264–268 Google Scholar


    Retzius AJ ( 1783) Anmärkningar vid. Asteriae genus. Kungl Sven Vetensk Handl 4: 230–248 Google Scholar


    Risso A ( 1826) Histoire naturelle des principales productions de l'Europe Méridionale et particulièrement de celles des environs de Nice et des Alpes Maritimes. F.G. Lecrault, Paris Google Scholar


    Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP ( 2003) MrBayse 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572–1574 Google Scholar


    Stamatakis A ( 2014) RAxML Version 8: A tool for Phylogenetic Analysis and Post-Analysis of Large Phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30: 1312–1313 Google Scholar


    Stöhr S, O'Hara TD, Thuy B ( 2012) Global diversity of brittle stars (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea). PLoS One 7: e31940.  Google Scholar


    Tamura K, Peterson D, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S ( 2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28: 2731–2739 Google Scholar


    Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ ( 1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nuc Acid Res 22: 4673–4680 Google Scholar


    Turner RL, Boucher JM ( 2010) Loss of arm spines in the basketstar Astrophyton muricatum (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea: Gorgonocephalidae), with a key to West Indian basketstars. Proc Biol Soc Wash 123: 17–26 Google Scholar


    Verrill AE ( 1867) Notes on Radiata in the museum of Yale College with descriptions of new genera and species—II. Notes on the echinoderms of Panama and the west coast of America, with descriptions of a new genus. Trans Conn Acad Arts Sci 1(2): 251–322 Google Scholar


    Verrill AE ( 1876) Annelids and echinoderms from Kerguelen Island. Bull US Natl Mus 3: 64–77 Google Scholar


    Verrill AE ( 1878) Art. 46. Notice of recent additions to the marine fauna of the eastern coast of North America, No. 2. Amer J Sci Arts 16(95): 371–378 Google Scholar


    Verrill AE ( 1899) Report on the Ophiuroidea collected by the Bahama expedition in 1893. Bull Lab Nat His State Univ Iowa 5: 1–86 Google Scholar


    Yang Z ( 1994a) Estimating the pattern of nucleotide substitution. J Mol Evol 39: 105–111 Google Scholar


    Yang Z ( 1994b) Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: approximate method. J Mol Evol 39: 306–314 Google Scholar
    © 2018 Zoological Society of Japan
    Masanori Okanishi and Toshihiko Fujita "Description of a New Subfamily, Astrocloninae (Ophiuroidea: Euryalida: Gorgonocephalidae), Based on Molecular Phylogeny and Morphological Observations," Zoological Science 35(2), 179-187, (1 April 2018).
    Received: 7 June 2017; Accepted: 1 November 2017; Published: 1 April 2018
    Back to Top