Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
4 December 2023 Description of the eggs and nest, with notes on the breeding ecology of Hellmayr's Pipit Anthus hellmayri dabbenei in Chile
Francisco Rivas, Heraldo V. Norambuena, Catalina Grandón Díaz, Sophie N. Seitz, Esteban Peña Bello
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

We report new ecological data for the poorly known migratory subspecies of Hellmayr's Pipit Anthus hellmayri dabbenei in Chile, describing four nests, eggs and some other aspects of the breeding biology. One nest was found in Bulnes, Ñuble region, in late October 2013, with three additional nests discovered between December 2019 and January 2020 on a grass-covered hill in Los Sauces, Araucanía region, in a previously harvested field. Eggs were oval, white to cream-white, with olive-brown speckling forming a ‘cap’. Adults fed the nestlings almost entirely on grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae), averaging 0.8 deliveries per minute (range 0–3 deliveries per minute). The max. gap between deliveries was 31 minutes.

Hellmayr's Pipit Anthus hellmayri, which is represented in Chile by the subspecies dabbenei (Hellmayr 1932, Goodall et al. 1946), is one of three species of Anthus in the country. Peruvian Pipit A. peruvianus (monotypic) occurs in Arica, in the far north of Chile (del Hoyo et al. 2020) and Correndera Pipit A. correndera is represented by A. c. calcaratus in eastern Antofagasta and A. c. correndera from Atacama southwards (Tyler 2020, Norambuena et al. 2021). Previous observations suggested that A. h. dabbenei prefers tall dry grassland with scattered bushes (Raimilla et al. 2012), whereas a Brazilian study showed that a population of A. h. hellmayri selected grassland that had experienced wildfire within a year, but was much less abundant in grassland affected by fire longer ago, suggesting that they tended to avoid tall, dense grasses (Chiarani et al. 2020). In the austral summer A. h. dabbenei is patchily distributed between 37°S to 46°S in Chile (Hellmayr 1932, Raimilla et al. 2012, 2013) and at 36–50°S in Argentina (Ridgely & Tudor 1989, Tyler 2004), being present in southern Bolivia and northern Argentina (probably at least as far as Córdoba and Entre Ríos) in May (Hellmayr 1932, Ridgely & Tudor 1989, Pearman & Areta 2020. The migration routes and site fidelity of migrants still need to be assessed using modern techniques such as geolocators. Basic natural history information is still lacking for many Neotropical Anthus; for example, the nests of Peruvian Pipit A. peruvianus and Paramo Pipit A. bogotensis have been described only recently (Arcco et al. 2020, van Els et al. 2022). Despite its broad distribution, until now just one nest of A. hellmayri had been reported in Chile (Norambuena 2018).

Temperate grasslands are among the most altered biomes on earth (Heidenreich 2009, Jacobson et al. 2019) with factors as diverse as afforestation and climate change impacting these ecosystems worldwide (Brennan 2005). Understanding the home range size and habitat preferences of a species is important when monitoring their populations (Strasser et al. 2019). Land use change on former grassland in central Chile might be a threat to local Hellmayr's Pipit populations, as is true elsewhere for several grassland birds that cannot persist in suitable but fragmented habitat (Herkert 1994, Vickery et al. 1994). Here, we describe the breeding habitat and some aspects of the breeding biology of A. h. dabbenei in Chile.

Field work and Methods

Nests were found in two areas: Bulnes in Ñuble region and Los Sauces in Araucanía region (Fig. 1). Bulnes was visited on 31 October 2013 and Los Sauces from 15 December 2019 through 15 January 2020. Bulnes was characterised by grassland habitat (height c.40–50 cm) with isolated shrubs. Vegetation in Los Sauces was characterised by grassland of variable height, with dry and low grasses (c.15–30 cm) dominating slopes and greenish, taller grasses (c.40–55 cm) the hollows. Sweet-briar Rosa eglanteria was sparsely distributed throughout the area. The site was rich in arthropods, mainly orthopterans (Acrididae) and some small Tettigoniidae (Conocephalus sp.). To locate nests, we conducted parallel transects with three observers spaced 5 m apart and checked the locations where birds flushed from the grass. All nest and egg measurements were taken using callipers precise to 0.1 mm.

To determine feeding rates by the adults, we deployed an autonomous recording unit (Audiomoth 1.0.0, Open Acoustic Devices, 2018) 10 cm from one of the nests for three days. The recording cycle was as follows: 24-hour/day, 0-second sleep duration and 60-second recording duration. The recorder uses the last two seconds of each one-minute cycle to write the file to the microSD card. To assess the presence of some insects we used a sample rate of 48 kHz. The gain setting was fixed between the ‘Low’ and ‘Med’ presets which avoids signal clipping when birds vocalise close to the recorder and minimises non-target sounds in the recordings. We inspected the recordings using Adobe Audition (Adobe CC 2017) in spectrogram view, then recorded the date and time for each begging call detected. To assess prey composition and test the association between deliveries and begging calls, we installed a trail camera (Campark T70) 30 cm from two of the nests (N2 and N4) for five hours each. When two or more begging calls were separated by ≥5 seconds in the same sound file, we treated these as independent feeding events, whereas calls separated by <5 seconds were considered the same feeding event, as this was the min. interval between deliveries detected using the trail camera.

Figure 1.

Location of the two nest sites of Hellmayr's Pipit Anthus hellmayri dabbenei in central Chile.

img-z2-4_479.jpg

Figure 2.

Nests of Hellmayr's Pipit Anthus hellmayri dabbenei in central Chile: (A) N1, Bulnes, with three nestlings c.8 days old; (B) N2, Los Sauces, with three nestlings c.10 days old; (C) N3, Los Sauces, with three eggs; (D) N4, Los Sauces, with four nestlings c.12 days old (A: Heraldo V. Norambuena, B–D: Francisco Rivas)

img-z3-1_479.jpg

Results and Discussion

Like other subspecies, A. h. dabbenei constructs a cup of grass, but its dimensions are slightly smaller. In Argentina, Colombo (2020) described that the nests of A. h. hellmayri had a mean external diameter of 8.63 ± 0.09 cm (range 6.5–10.53 cm), mean internal diameter 6.39 ± 0.08 cm (range 4.88–8.05 cm) and mean depth 3.99 ± 0.07 cm (range 2.7–5.5 cm). In Brazil, a nest of A. h. brasilianus had an external diameter of 8 cm, internal diameter 6 cm, and depth 4 cm (Lombardi et al. 2010). The quantitative data of our findings are summarised in Table 1. The first nest (N1) was found on 31 October 2013, at Bulnes. It was hidden in the grass and held three nestlings (Fig. 2A). To ascertain the species involved, we waited for the adults to return to the nest. After a few minutes an adult approached with an insect and made territorial flights over the nest area; it was identified as A. hellmayri by its plumage.

On 15 December 2019 FR, CGD, SNS & EPB visited Los Sauces and observed 16 adults. On the same day, we found an active nest (N2) with five eggs (the surviving nestlings are shown in Fig. 2B). The number of eggs in this nest corresponds to the max. clutch size reported to date (Colombo 2022). The nest was cup-shaped but covered by a dome of dry grass stems, slightly inclined towards the entrance. These long stems were clustered by an agricultural machine during a previous harvest, as verified from satellite images taken the previous year (Google Earth, 14 February 2019). The eggs were photographed but no measurements were taken. They were creamy white speckled olive-brown throughout, but with a slight ‘capped’ effect, similar to those reported by Lombardi et al. (2010) in Brazil.

TABLE 1

Location, orientation and measurements of the four nests of Hellmayr's Pipit Anthus hellmayri dabbenei in central Chile described in this paper.

img-z4-3_479.gif

We visited the site again on 29 December 2019 and found another nest (N3), 45 m from N2, with three eggs: 20.55 ± 0.29 × 15.31 ± 0.2 mm (Fig. 2C). These measurements are slightly larger (by 0.44 × 0.58 mm) than the means reported by Salvador (2015) for A. h. hellmayri in north-west Argentina. The nest had an asymmetrical structure, with the lower edge facing the entrance and a reduced dome compared to N1 and N2. The same day we found three grey down-covered chicks in N2.

On 6 January 2020, we found the fourth nest (N4), 35 m from N3, with four nestlings (Fig. 2D) partially covered with grey down feathers. Their palate had yellowish choanal papillae. Again, the nest was cup-shaped and roofed with dry stems. To estimate the age of the nestlings we followed the guide for A. spragueii by Jongsomjit et al. (2007). Estimated hatching dates are shown in Table 1.

On 9 January 2020 N2 was empty. On 15 January 2020 N4 was empty and no eggs had hatched in N3, which had been abandoned by the adults; we confirmed this by watching the nest for five hours, during which time no adults approached it. We found a spider Latrodectus thoracicus using the nest to store prey and build a web across the cup. L. thoracicus was common in the grass mounds used by the pipits to nest.

Based on camera monitoring, we assessed that both members of the pair participated in provisioning food, confirming observations in Brazil (Sick 1997). All of the identified prey (n = 16) were grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae), although it is probable that they also feed the nestlings with Conocephalus vitticollis (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae), a small conehead whose presence in the site was confirmed via Passive Acoustic Monitoring (PAM) analysis, and other small arthropods. After analysing the sonograms of our acoustic recordings, we noted a decrease in feeding rates at noon and during heavy winds. The largest interval between feeding events was 38 minutes, between 08.24 h and 09.02 h. The adults provided a mean 0.8 deliveries per minute.

In general terms, the breeding phenology of A. h. dabbenei is like that reported for Correndera Pipit in central Chile (Norambuena et al. 2017) but may show some variation depending on the arrival of pairs post-migration. For example, pairs incubating in late October is similar to the phenology of Correndera Pipit in Patagonia, which is also migratory to some extent, with the result that nesting can be delayed (Norambuena et al. 2017). In Aysén (43–49°S), territorial A. h. dabbenei have been reported in December and January (Raimilla et al. 2013). The seasonal difference between the nest found in 2013 and those in 2019 may indicate that some pairs are double-brooded. Another possibility is that egg laying occurs within a three-month window, as observed in Sprague's Pipit A. spragueii (Maher 1973, Sutter et al. 1996) and Ochre-breasted Pipit A. nattereri (Fraga 2001). We infer that the breeding season in south-central Chile starts in September–October with nest construction and egg laying, and ends around mid January when the last nestlings fledge.

Both of the two successful nests at this site were oriented east, consistent with findings for A. spragueii (Sutter 1997). The failed nest was the only one oriented west-southwest, in line with studies that have found a significant correlation between mean nest orientation and latitude in several ground-nesting passerines (Burton 2007). At middle latitudes nests facing east, rather than west, may warm more rapidly in the morning and are better protected from solar radiation in the afternoon (Nelson & Martin 1999). The coloration and size of the eggs are consistent with the observations of de la Peña (2013) and Lombardi et al. (2010), who reported nests in Argentina and Brazil, respectively.

The relatively short distance between the different nests found at Los Sauces and our failure to find more nests in nearby areas suggest that the species might possess a facultative semi-colonial breeding strategy, perhaps driven by agricultural pressure and limited habitat availability (Raimilla et al. 2012). Pairs left the nesting area in the first days after the young fledged the nest, probably to forage in long-grass areas, behaviour also observed in Argentine populations (J. I. Areta in litt. 2019). Diet was consistent with that described for A. spragueii, which feeds almost entirely on arthropods in the breeding season (Harris 1933b, Maher 1973).

More research is needed to better understand the breeding habitat requirements of A. h. dabbenei and how its populations respond to agricultural pressure. We recommend local stakeholders develop plans to protect its breeding habitat by designing harvest schedules that enable the birds to use remaining mounds for nesting.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the local farmers in Los Sauces for allowing us to enter their collective property and monitor the nests, and two referees for their comments on the submitted version of the manuscript.

© 2023 The Authors

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

References:

1.

Arcco, A. R., van Els, P., Catacora, Y. D. F. & Norambuena, H. V. 2020. First description of the nest and eggs of Peruvian Pipit (Anthus peruvianus, Aves: Motacillidae). Orn. Neotrop. 31: 5–8. Google Scholar

2.

Brennan, L. & Kuvlesky, W. 2005. North American grassland birds: an unfolding conservation crisis? J. Wildl. Manag. 69: 1–13. Google Scholar

3.

Burton, N. 2007. Intraspecific latitudinal variation in nest orientation among ground-nesting passerines: a study using published data. Condor 109: 441–446. Google Scholar

4.

Chiarani, E., Bettio, M. & Fontana, C. S. 2020. Temporal changes in bird communities in areas with different histories of fire disturbance in highland grasslands of Brazil. PLoS ONE 15(12): e0243070. Google Scholar

5.

Colombo, M. 2022. Biología reproductiva de la Cachirla pálida (Aves: Motacillidae) en pastizales del noreste de la provincia de Buenos Aires con uso ganadero extensivo. Ph.D. thesis. Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata. Google Scholar

6.

van Els, P. & Norambuena, H. V. 2018. A revision of species limits in Neotropical pipits Anthus based on multilocus genetic and vocal data. Ibis 160: 158–172. Google Scholar

7.

van Els, P., Norambuena, H. V. & Lebbin, D. J. 2022. First description of the nest and eggs of the Paramo Pipit (Anthus bogotensis). Bol. UNOP 17(2): 1–4. Google Scholar

8.

Fraga, R. 2001. The avifauna of Estancia San Juan Poriahú, Iberá Marshes, Argentina: checklist and some natural history notes. Cotinga 16: 81–86. Google Scholar

9.

Goodall, J. D., Johnson, A. W. & Phillippi, R. A. 1946. Las aves de Chile. Su conocimiento y costumbres, vol. 1. Platt Establecimientos Gráficos, Buenos Aires. Google Scholar

10.

Harris, R. 1933b. Observations on a nest of Sprague's Pipit (Anthus spragueii). Can. Field-Nat. 47: 91–95. Google Scholar

11.

Heidenreich, B. 2009. What are global temperate grasslands worth? A case for their protection. World Temperate Grasslands Conservation Initiative.  https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/2009-050.pdf(accessed 12 April 2020). Google Scholar

12.

Hellmayr, C. E. 1921. Remarques sur les espèces neotropicales du genre Anthus. Hornero 2: 180–193. Google Scholar

13.

Hellmayr, C. E. 1932. Birds of Chile. Field Mus. Nat. Hist. Zool. Ser. 19: 1–472. Google Scholar

14.

Herkert, J. R. 1994. The effects of habitat fragmentation on midwestern grassland bird communities. Ecol. Appl. 4: 461–471. Google Scholar

15.

del Hoyo, J., Collar, N. & Kirwan, G. M. 2020. Peruvian Pipit (Anthus peruvianus), version 1.0. In del Hoyo, J. Elliott, A., Sargatal, J., Christie, D. A. & de Juana, E. (eds.) Birds of the world. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY.  https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.yelpip3.01(accessed 18 May 2023). Google Scholar

16.

Jacobson, A. P., Riggio, J., Tait, A. & Baillie, J. E. M. 2019. Global areas of low human impact (‘Low Impact Areas’) and fragmentation of the natural world. Sci. Rep. 9: 14179. Google Scholar

17.

Jongsomjit, D., Jones, S. L., Gardali, T., Geupel, G. R. & Gouse, P. J. 2007. A guide to nestling development and aging in altricial passerines. US Dept. of Interior, Fish & Wildlife Service, Biol. Tech. Publ., FWS/BTPR6008-2007, Washington, DC. Google Scholar

18.

Lombardi, V. T., Faetti, R. G., Neto, S. D., Vasconcelos, M. F. & Gussoni, C. O. A. 2010. Notas sobre a nidificação de aves brasileiras raras e/ou pouco conhecidas. Cotinga 32: 131–136. Google Scholar

19.

Maher, W. J. 1973. Birds: I. Population dynamics. Matador Project Tech. Rep. 34. Canadian Committee for the International Biological Programme, Saskatoon. Google Scholar

20.

Nelson, K. J. & Martin, K. 1999. Thermal aspects of nest-site location for Vesper Sparrows and Horned Larks in British Columbia. Stud. Avian Biol. 19: 137–143. Google Scholar

21.

Norambuena, H. V. 2018. Bailarín chico pálido. Pp. 532–533 in Medrano, F., Barros, R., Norambuena, H. V., Matus, R. & Schmitt, F. (eds.) Atlas de las aves nidificantes de Chile. Red de Observadores de Aves y Vida Silvestre de Chile, Santiago. Google Scholar

22.

Norambuena, H. V., Areta, J. I., Medrano, F., Ortíz, P. & Victoriano, P. F. 2017. Aportes a la historia natural del bailarín chico o cachirla común (Anthus correndera chilensis). Orn. Neotrop. 28: 243–252. Google Scholar

23.

Norambuena, H. V., van Els, P., Victoriano, P. F. & Knowles, L. 2021. Genome-wide DNA and phenotypic information supports recent colonization of South American grasslands by Correndera Pipit (Aves, Motacillidae). Zool. Scripta 50: 397–410. Google Scholar

24.

Pearman, M. & Areta, J. I. 2020. Birds of Argentina and the South-west Atlantic. Bloomsbury, London. Google Scholar

25.

de la Peña, M. R. 2013. Nidos y reproducción de las aves argentinas. Ed. Biológica, Santa Fe. Google Scholar

26.

de la Peña, M. R. 2015. Aves argentinas. Incluye nidos y huevos , vol. 2. Eudeba y Ed. Universidad Nacional del Litoral, Buenos Aires y Santa Fe. Google Scholar

27.

Preston, F. 1953. The shapes of birds' eggs. Auk 70: 160–182. Google Scholar

28.

Raimilla, V., Hauenstein, E., Norambuena, H. V., Jaramillo, A. & Cañete, R. 2012. Nuevos antecedentes sobre el estatus y hábitat del Bailarín chico argentino (Anthus hellmayri) en el centro-sur de Chile. Orn. Neotrop. 23: 151–158. Google Scholar

29.

Raimilla, V., Norambuena, H. V. & Orellana, R. 2013. Confirmación de la presencia de Bailarín chico argentino (Anthus hellmayri dabbenei) en la región de Aysén, Patagonia chilena. Bol. Chil. Orn. 19: 26–29. Google Scholar

30.

Ridgely, R. & Tudor, G. 1989. The birds of South America , vol. 1. Univ. of Texas Press, Austin. Google Scholar

31.

Salvador, S. 2015. Reproducción de aves andinas del noroeste argentino. Hist. Nat. 5: 49–76. Google Scholar

32.

Sick, H. 1997. Ornitologia brasileira. Ed. Nova Fronteira. Rio de Janeiro. Google Scholar

33.

Strasser, E. H., Ruvalcaba-Ortega, I., Pena-Peniche, A., Panjabi, A. O., Martínez-Guerrero, H., Canales-delCastillo, R. & Correll, M. D. 2019. Habitat and space use of wintering Sprague's Pipits (Anthus spragueii) in northern Mexico. Wilson J. Orn. 131: 472–485. Google Scholar

34.

Sutter, G. C. 1997. Nest-site selection and nest-entrance orientation in Sprague's Pipit. Wilson Bull. 109: 462–469. Google Scholar

35.

Sutter, G. C., Sawatzky, D. J., Cooper, M. D. & Brigham, R. M. 1996. Renesting intervals in Sprague's Pipit, Anthus spragueii. Can. Field-Nat. 110: 1–4. Google Scholar

36.

Tyler, S. 2004. Family Motacillidae (pipits and wagtails). Pp. 686–786 in del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A. & Christie, D. A. (eds.) Handbook of the birds of the world , vol. 9. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona. Google Scholar

37.

Tyler, S. 2020. Correndera Pipit (Anthus correndera). In del Hoyo, J. Elliott, A., Sargatal, J., Christie, D. A. & de Juana, E. (eds.) Birds of the world. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY.  https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.corpip1.01(accessed 18 May 2023). Google Scholar

38.

Vickery, P. D., Hunter, M. L. & Melvin, S. M. 1994. Effects of habitat area on the distribution of grassland birds in Maine. Conserv. Biol. 8: 1087–1097. Google Scholar
Francisco Rivas, Heraldo V. Norambuena, Catalina Grandón Díaz, Sophie N. Seitz, and Esteban Peña Bello "Description of the eggs and nest, with notes on the breeding ecology of Hellmayr's Pipit Anthus hellmayri dabbenei in Chile," Bulletin of the British Ornithologists’ Club 143(4), 479-484, (4 December 2023). https://doi.org/10.25226/bboc.v143i4.2023.a5
Received: 13 April 2023; Published: 4 December 2023
Back to Top