Translator Disclaimer
1 July 2011 Comparing and evaluating digital soil mapping methods in a Hungarian forest reserve
Gábor Illés, Gábor Kovács, Bálint Heil
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Illés, G., Kovács, G. and Heil, B. 2011. Comparing and evaluating digital soil mapping methods in a Hungarian forest reserve. Can. J. Soil Sci. 91: 615-626. To investigate applications of widespread digital soil mapping methods in forestry management, soil maps for a Hungarian forest reserve were developed using general discriminant and classification tree analysis as predictive tools. Soil samples were collected applying an unaligned semi-systematic grid. Second level units of the World Reference Base of Soil Resources and their yield capacity were determined. Terrain attributes were derived using a digital elevation model, and they were assigned to soil data to be used as predictors for second level units of the World Reference Base for Soil Resources (SLU) maps. A comparison was made of prediction accuracy. Both the discriminant analysis and the classification tree-based prediction were able to derive SLU maps; however, the classification accuracies were uneven. The methods used provided 63-65% average classification accuracy for dominant SLUs, but only 0-18% in the case of less common SLUs. One of the major issues of digital soil mapping that needs to be addressed is that the same inputs may result in different output maps depending on the use of spatial predictions. To overcome this problem we created a new combination of these methods in which the classification accuracies were used to select the most appropriate prediction. For each location, the method that gave higher prediction accuracy was used to extend the soil map to unknown areas. In this way we improved the overall accuracy of output maps as well as the prediction accuracies of individual SLUs.

Gábor Illés, Gábor Kovács, and Bálint Heil "Comparing and evaluating digital soil mapping methods in a Hungarian forest reserve," Canadian Journal of Soil Science 91(4), 615-626, (1 July 2011). https://doi.org/10.1139/CJSS2010-007
Received: 2 October 2010; Accepted: 1 February 2011; Published: 1 July 2011
JOURNAL ARTICLE
12 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top