Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 January 2020 Expanded morphological definition and molecular phylogenetic position of the Tam Dao mountain stream keelback Opisthotropis tamdaoensis (Squamata: Natricidae) from Vietnam
Thomas Ziegler, Tim N. Ziegler, Julia Peusquens, Patrick David, Thanh N. Vu, Cuong T. Pham, Truong Q. Nguyen, Minh D. Le
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The description of Opisthotropis tamdaoensisZiegler, David & Vu, 2008, which was based on the male holotype only, is expanded herein on the basis of four newly collected specimens from the type locality of the species, including three adult females. Based on the enlarged sample size and thus extended range of morphological characters in O. tamdaoensis, not all characters mentioned in the original description as being distinctive between the latter species and O. lateralisBoulenger, 1903, a morphologically similar species, could withstand, such as number and arrangement of preocular, temporal and subocular scales, as well as total size. Presently, the number and arrangement of supralabials in concert with the dorsal colour pattern and the course of the dark lateral stripe still serve as good diagnostic characters to morphologically distinguish O. tamdaoensis from O. lateralis. Thus, on the basis of the new morphological and for the first time also molecular data, the validity of O. tamdaoensis as a distinct species is confirmed. The molecular analyses based on the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene revealed O. tamdaoensis to be distinct by about 6% genetic divergence from O. lateralis, with which it forms a sister relationship.

INTRODUCTION

Water snakes of the genus Opisthotropis, often referred to as Mountain stream keelbacks, are highly aquatic snakes which inhabit flowing streams of hills and mountains of tropical and subtropical Asia. Mountain stream keelbacks are distributed across the mainland of Southeast Asia to Sumatra (Indonesia), the Philippines and the Ryukyu Archipelago of Japan. This genus, which currently comprises 21 species, is still imperfectly known (Teynié et al., 2013). No less than five Opisthotropis species have been discovered in the past decade only: O. laui from China, O. maculosa from Thailand and China, O. durandi from Laos, and O. cucae as well as O. tamdaoensis from Vietnam (Stuart & Chuaynkern, 2007; Ziegler et al., 2008; David et al., 2011; Teynié et al., 2013; Yang et al., 2013).

From Vietnam, eight species of mountain stream keelbacks have been recorded so far (David et al., 2011; Nguyen et al., 2017), most of which are rare or at least rarely collected and thus poorly known. One of these uncommon mountain stream keelbacks from Vietnam is Opisthotropis tamdaoensis, a species recently described from the Tam Dao mountain ridge in northern Vietnam. The original description was based on a single male individual only, which, however, showed peculiar morphological characters compared with its congeners which were the crucial factor for scientific description (Ziegler et al., 2008). Recently, Ziegler et al. (2015) reported about another sighting of O. tamdaoensis in a forest stream in the surroundings of the Melinh Station for Biodiversity in Vinh Phuc Province, which borders Tam Dao National Park in the West.

During recent herpetological field work in Tam Dao, further Opisthotropis individuals were collected in the Bac (Silver) stream, the type locality of O. tamdaoensis. Based on this new collection from the type locality, which morphologically was clearly assignable to O. tamdaoensis, we herein expand the morphological definition of the species, for the first time including adult female individuals. Based on this new collection we also conducted molecular analyses based on the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene to test the distinct taxonomic status and to define for the first time the phylogenetic position within the genus Opisthotropis.

The Tonkin mountain stream keelback, O. lateralis Boulenger, 1903, is morphologically similar to O. tamdaoensis. This species was originally described from northern Vietnam (Manson Mt., nowadays Mao Son Mt., Lang Son Province), and currently is known from central and northern Vietnam as well as from southern China (Guangxi, Guizhou, Hong Kong) (Ziegler et al., 2008; Nguyen et al., 2009; Hecht et al., 2013; Gawor et al., 2016). Based on new collections of the Tonkin mountain stream keelback from northern Vietnam's Bac Giang, Cao Bang and Quang Ninh provinces we additionally provide new information on its morphometry and scalation and morphologically and for the first time also genetically compare O. lateralis with O. tamdaoensis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study is based on four newly collected Opisthotropis tamdaoensis and nine newly collected O. lateralis.

Tissue samples were preserved separately in 95% ethanol and voucher specimens were anaesthetized with ethyl acetate, fixed in approximately 85% ethanol, and then transferred to 70% ethanol for permanent storage.

Individuals were subsequently deposited in the following collections:

IEBR

Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources, Vietnamese Academy of Science and Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam

MHNG

Muséum d'histoire naturelle, Geneva, Switzerland

VNMN

Vietnam National Museum of Nature, Hanoi, Vietnam

ZFMK

Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Bonn, Germany.

The holotype of O. tamdaoensis is deposited in the Zoological Museum, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, Vietnam (VNUH).

Opisthotropis tamdaoensis: IEBR A.2016.32, Suoi Bac (Silver stream), Tam Dao, northern Vietnam, coll. Thanh Ngoc Vu, 29 June 2008. - IEBR A.2016.33, Suoi Bac (Silver stream), Tam Dao, northern Vietnam, coll. Cuong The Pham, 31 May 2014. - MHNG 2767.60, Suoi Bac (Silver stream), Tam Dao, northern Vietnam, coll. Thanh Ngoc Vu, July 2007. - ZFMK 100000, Suoi Bac (Silver stream), Tam Dao, northern Vietnam, coll. Thanh Ngoc Vu.

Opisthotropis lateralis: IEBR 3629, Son Dong, Tay Yen Tu, Bac Giang Province, coll. Truong Quang Nguyen, Tung Thanh Tran & Cuong The Pham, 07 April 2008. - IEBR 3644, Son Dong, Tay Yen Tu, Bac Giang Province, coll. Truong Quang Nguyen, Tung Thanh Tran & Cuong The Pham, 09 April 2008. - IEBR 3645, Son Dong, Tay Yen Tu, Bac Giang Province, coll. Truong Quang Nguyen, Tung Thanh Tran & Cuong The Pham, 09 April 2008. - IEBR A.2016.35, Dong Son Ky Thuong, Bac Giang / Quang Ninh provinces, coll. Ha Thuy Duong, June 2013. - IEBR A.2016.36, Tay Yen Tu, Bac Giang Province, coll. Cuong The Pham & Mona van Schingen, 15 May 2015. - VNMN A.2016.14, Bai Tu Long, Quang Ninh Province, coll. Tao Thien Nguyen & Cuong The Pham, 19 September 2009. - VNMN A.2016.15, Cao Bang Province, coll. Tao Thien Nguyen, 08 June 2009. - ZFMK 100805, Tay Yen Tu, Bac Giang Province, coll. Truong Quang Nguyen & Thomas Ziegler, May 2009. - ZFMK 100806, Tay Yen Tu, Bac Giang Province, coll. Truong Quang Nguyen & Thomas Ziegler, 16 May 2014.

In addition, O. lateralis specimens recorded in Ziegler et al. (2008), Hecht et al. (2013) and Gawor et al. (2016) were reexamined.

Morphological examination: Identification of sex was performed by dissection (inspection of gonads and inspection of presence of hemipenes). Measurements were taken after preservation with a measuring tape. The number of ventral scales was counted according to Dowling (1951). The numbers of dorsal scale rows are given at one head length behind head, at midbody, and at one head length before vent, respectively. Maxillary teeth were counted by dissecting the right maxilla for teeth / alveoles. Scalation and maxillary teeth number were studied by using a binocular. We herein use the term precloacal instead of anal.

Abbreviations of morphological characters used in the text are as follows.

Measures and ratios: SVL: snout-vent length. – TaL: tail length. – TL: total length (SVL + TaL). – TaL/TL: ratio tail length/total length.

Meristic characters: ATem: anterior temporal scales (in contact with postocular scale / scales). – DSR: formula of dorsal scale rows. – IL: infralabial scales. – Lor: loreal scales. – PreOc: preocular scales. – PreVen: preventral scales. – PostOc: postocular scales. – PTem: posterior temporal scales (in contact with anterior temporal scale / scales). – SL: supralabial scales. – SL/ orbit: supralabial scale / scales touching the orbit. – Subc: subcaudal scales (without tail tip). – SubOc: subocular scales. – Ven: ventral scales.

Molecular analyses: The mitochondrial cytochrome b gene was employed in this study, because it has been successfully used in previous molecular analyses of Lycodon (e.g. Guo et al., 2012). We included three new sequences from samples collected in Vietnam, IEBR A.2016.33 (Opisthotropis tamdaoensis) from Tam Dao National Park, VNMN A.2016.14 (O. lateralis) from Bai Tu Long, and ZFMK 100806 (O. lateralis) from Tay Yen Tu (GenBank MF477899 through MF477901). Another sequence of O. lateralis (GenBank accession number CG281782) originated from Guangxi Province, China. Other sequences of related species were obtained from GenBank. Three species, Sinonatrix aequifasciata, S. annularis, and S. percarinata were used as outgroups based on their phylogenetic relationships to the genus Lycodon (Guo et al., 2012) (Fig. 5).

We used the protocols of Le et al. (2006) for DNA extraction, amplification, and sequencing. A fragment of the mitochondrial cytochrome b was amplified using the primer pair L14910/H16064 (Burbrink et al., 2000). After sequences were aligned by Clustal X v2 (Thompson et al., 1997), data were analyzed using maximum parsimony (MP) and combined (single model of molecular evolution) maximum likelihood (ML) as implemented in PAUP*4.0b10 (Swofford, 2001), partitioned ML (mixed models of molecular evolution based on codon positions) in IQTree v1.5.5 (Nguyen et al., 2015), and Bayesian combined and partitioned analysis (BA) as implemented in MrBayes v3.2 (Ronquist et al., 2012). Settings for MP, combined ML, and Bayesian analyses followed Le et al. (2006), except that the number of generations in the Bayesian analysis was increased to 1′107 and the number of bootstrap replicates in ML to 1000. Bootstrap support in IQTree was calculated using the ultrafast option (Bui et al., 2013). For MP analysis, heuristic analysis was conducted with 100 random taxon addition replicates using tree-bisection and reconnection (TBR) branch swapping algorithm, with no upper limit set for the maximum number of trees saved. Bootstrap support was calculated using 1000 pseudo-replicates and 100 random taxon addition replicates. All characters were equally weighted and unordered. The optimal model for nucleotide evolution was set to GTR+I+G for combined ML and Bayesian analyses as selected by ModelTest v3.7 (Posada & Crandall, 1998). In the partitioned Bayesian analysis, models of molecular evolution identified by ModelTest for codon position one, two, and three were GTR+I, TrN+I+G, and TVM+G, respectively. In the partitioned ML analysis, they were determined by IQTree as TN+I, TN+G, and TPM+G, respectively. The cutoff point for the burn-in function was set to 13 and 16 in combined and partitioned Bayesian analyses, respectively, as -lnL scores reached stationarity after 13 000 and 16 000 generations in both runs. Nodal support was evaluated using Bootstrap replication (BP) as estimated in PAUP and posterior probability (PP) in MrBayes v3.2. BP ≥ 70% and PP ≥ 95% are regarded as strong support for a clade. Uncorrected pairwise divergences (p-distance) were calculated in PAUP*4.0b10.

RESULTS

The new Opisthotropis series from Silver Stream in Tam Dao was collected in secondary monsoon tropical evergreen forest on granitic soil. Individuals were discovered in between 09:00 to 12:00 am at elevations in between 1200 to 1500 m above sea level. The snakes were in the shallow water in stream sections with open forest.

Subsequent dissections revealed the specimens to represent one adult male and three adult females. The females, which all were collected during the summer, contained large eggs besides small oocytes: IEBR A.2016.33 with eggs up to 24 mm in size (in May), IEBR A.2016.32 with eggs up to 19 mm in size (in June), and MHNG 2767.60 with eggs up to 23 mm in size (in July). Morphometrical data, scalation and dentition of the new Opisthotrophis series from the type locality of O. tamdaoensis are summarized in Table 1. Morphologically, the new individuals (Figs 1-3) could be clearly identified as O. tamdaoensis. However, based on the meanwhile extended sample size, compared with the original description, which was based on a single male individual only, the morphological description of the species must be expanded as follows (based on two adult males, including the holotype, and three adult females): Maximum known total length 555 mm (maximum known snout vent length 475 mm, maximum known tail length 82 mm); tail / total length ratio 0.143-0.157; body stout, cylindrical; head not distinct from neck, dorsally covered with large shields; eye small, with round pupil. Maxillary teeth 25-29. Rostral broader than high; internasals in contact with rostral, nasals, and single prefrontal; frontal pentagonal, widest anteriorly; nasal not divided below nostril; one (rarely two) elongated loreals; loreals not in contact with internasals; one or two preoculars (one preocular in the holotype), two postoculars, one supraocular; one (rarely none) subocular; postoculars followed by one (rarely two) anterior temporals, in the rare latter case the upper one being larger and elongate; anterior temporal(s) followed by (i.e., in contact with) two or three (rarely four) posterior temporals (holotype with 2 anterior and 3-4 posterior temporals); only the holotype shows an additional “postsubocular” scale that is surrounded by the lower anterior temporal, the lower postocular, subocular, and two supralabials; nine (rarely eight) supralabials, the fifth or fifth and sixth (rarely none) in contact with eye; first supralabial not vertical, but directed backward, anterior supralabials distinctly higher than long; mental triangular-shaped, wider than high; ten (rarely nine or eleven) infralabials; first pair of chin shields in contact with first four to five infralabials, and being larger and longer than the second pair of chin shields; posterior chin shields separated by two to three smaller scales.

Table 1.

Sex, morphometry and scalation of the holotype of Opisthotropis tamdaoensis (after Ziegler et al., 2008) and the new series from Tam Dao; values given in brackets indicate infrequent condition.

t01_377.gif

Fig. 1.

Head portraits of the new series of Opisthotropis tamdaoensis in preserved state, showing the head scalation and the insertion of the black lateral stripe in the midst of the dark dorsal colouration. (A) Female IEBR A.2016.33. (B) Male ZFMK 100000. (C) Female IEBR A.2016.32. (D) Female MHNG 2767.60. Photos: T. Ziegler

f01_377.jpg

Dorsal scales in 19 rows at anterior body, in 17 rows at midbody and at posterior body, dorsals finely tuberculate, smooth anteriorly, keeled posteriorly; tail surface distinctly keeled; 0-4 pre- and 162-176 ventrals; precloacal divided; 48-51 divided subcaudals.

Dorsum in preservative nearly uniform olive grey or grey above and paler below, without sharp transition (ca. at the second to third dorsal scale row); dorsum sometimes with rudiments of thin black longitudinal stripes; a more or less distinct dark longitudinal lateral stripe of about 1-2 mm width extends from the eye along the lowermost 3-5 dorsal body scale rows towards the tail tip; supralabials except the completely dark anteriormost ones dark above and pale below; centre of mental and anteriormost infralabials dark; tip of subcaudal region usually with dark mottling. There exists sexual dimorphism related to the number of ventrals, which is higher in males than in females (171-176 versus 162-165) and the relative length of the tail (ratio Tal / TL 0.143-0.144 in males versus 0.157 in females); in addition, males appear to be more slender than the females.

Fig. 2.

Characteristic feature of Opisthotropis tamdaoensis: the black lateral stripe in the midst of the dark dorsal colouration. (A) Male ZFMK 100000 (left), and female IEBR A.1016.32 (right) in preserved state. (B) Detail of the body side of the female IEBR A.1016.33 in preserved state. Photos: T. Ziegler

f02_377.jpg

Fig. 3.

Drawings showing the head scalation in Opisthotropis tamdaoensis. (A) Male holotype after Ziegler et al. (2008), with the additional scale below the eye earmarked. (B) Female IEBR A.1016.33. (C) Male ZFMK 100000) compared to O. lateralis (D: Male IEBR 3645). Supralabials are numbered to show the differences between the new series of O. tamdaoensis (B, C) and O. lateralis (D). Drawings: T. Ziegler

f03_377.jpg

Based on the enlarged sample size for O. tamdaoensis, the combination of diagnostic characters must be expanded as follows:

  1. (1) nasal not divided below nostril;

  2. (2) 1-2 loreals, not in contact with internasals;

  3. (3) 1-2 preoculars; 2 postoculars; usually 1 subocular;

  4. (4) 1-2 anterior and 2-4 posterior temporals;

  5. (5) 9 (rarely 8) supralabials, only the fifth or fifth to sixth supralabial (rarely none) in contact with the eye;

  6. (6) 9-10 (rarely 11) infralabials;

  7. (7) first pair of chin shields longer than the second pair;

  8. (8) dorsal scales smooth anteriorly, keeled posteriorly; in 19-17-17 rows;

  9. (9) 0-4 pre- and 162-176 ventrals; precloacal divided; 48-51 divided subcaudals;

  10. (10) uniform olive grey dorsum, with a dark longitudinal lateral stripe within the dark flank coloration; ventral side pale, without sharp transition towards the dark dorsal coloration, tip of the subcaudal region may bear dark mottling.

In the molecular analyses, the final matrix consisted of 1100 aligned characters, of which 268 were parsimony informative. The alignment did not contain gaps. Maximum parsimony analysis of the dataset recovered a single most parsimonious tree with 654 steps (CI = 0.73; RI = 0.71). In the ML analysis, the score of the single best tree found was 4252.62 after 287 arrangements were tried. All ingroup nodes received strong support values from all analyses, except for the placement of Opisthotropis cheni + O. latouchii, which was only strongly corroborated by the MP analysis. O. tamdaoensis was recovered as a sister taxon of O. lateralis with high statistical values from all analyses (Fig. 5). Two taxa showed about 6% genetic divergence. The O. lateralis from Guangxi in southern China was estimated to be about 2% divergence towards Vietnamese O. lateralis.

Based on the meanwhile enlarged sample size and thus extended range of morphological characters in O. tamdaoensis, not all characters mentioned in Ziegler et al. (2008) as being distinctive between the latter species and O. lateralis could withstand, such as number and arrangement of preoculars (only one preocular present in the holotype), temporals (2 anterior and 3–4 posterior temporals in the holotype) and subocular scales (existence of an additional “postsubocular” scale that is surrounded by the lower anterior temporal, the lower postocular, subocular, and two supralabials in the holotype), as well as total size.

Fig. 4.

Lateral views of two of the newly collected Opisthotropis lateralis in life. (A) Male ZFMK 100805. (B) Juvenile ZFMK 100806; the characteristic black lateral stripe that sharply separates the dark dorsal colouration from the light venter is well discernible. Photos: T. Ziegler

f04_377.jpg

However, there remain still clear morphological differences between the sister taxa [after Pope (1935), Bourret (1936), Smith (1943), and our own data presented herein, see Tables 2-3, Figs 3-4]:

  1. 1) O. tamdaoensis has 9 (rarely 8) supralabials versus 10 [very rarely 9 or 11] in O. lateralis;

  2. 2) O. tamdaoensis has only the fifth or fifth and sixth supralabials (very rarely none) in contact with the eye, whereas in O. lateralis very rarely the fifth or even none supralabial, but usually supralabials 5-6, 6, 6-7, or 5-7 are entering the orbit, and

  3. 3) O. tamdaoensis has a black lateral stripe that does not sharply separate the dark dorsum from the pale ventral pattern (sharply separated in the case of O. lateralis) and rather takes course within the dark flank coloration; dark dorsum in O. tamdaoensis without sharp transition towards the light venter.

DISCUSSION

Based on a new Opisthotropis collection from the type locality of O. tamdaoensis the morphological definition of the species could be expanded, for the first time also including complete subcaudal counts and female individuals. The existence of an additional “postsubocular” scale that is surrounded by the lower anterior temporal, the lower postocular, subocular, and two supralabials, considered as a diagnostic character by Ziegler et al. (2008), revealed to be an abnormality of the holotype. The molecular analyses revealed O. tamdaoensis to be the sister species of O. lateralis, which is morphologically similar. Based on the herein expanded morphological definition of O. tamdaoensis, not all characters given as distinctive between the latter species and O. lateralis in Ziegler et al. (2008) could withstand. However, the number and arrangement of supralabials in concert with the dorsal colour pattern and the course of the dark lateral stripe still serve as good diagnostic characters to morphologically distinguish O. tamdaoensis from O. lateralis. The distinct specific status of the latter taxa is also corroborated by the molecular differentiation of about 6% between both species.

Fig. 5.

Combined Bayesian phylogram based on a partial cytochrome b fragment. Numbers above and under branches are MP/combined ML/partitioned ML bootstrap values and combined/partitioned Bayesian posterior probabilities (>50%), respectively. Hyphen and asterisk denote <50% and 100% values, respectively.

f05_377.jpg

Table 2.

Sex, morphometry and scalation of the new series of Opisthotropis lateralis from northern Vietnam's Bac Giang, Cao Bang and Quang Ninh provinces; values given in brackets indicate infrequent condition.

t02_377.gif

Table 3.

Sex, morphometry and scalation data of Opisthotropis lateralis from the literature (data from Hecht et al., 2013, and Gawor et al., 2016 modified) M: in males, F: in females.

t03_377.gif

Concerning the morphological examination of a new series of O. lateralis from Vietnam, the dorsal scale row count at the neck in the O. lateralis specimen IEBR A.2013.54 from Bai Tu Long was divergent (17 instead 19). However, this seems to represent an abnormality, as another individual from Bai Tu Long (VNMN A.2016.14) showed the species specific dorsal scale row count at the neck (19) and furthermore showed no divergent position in the phylogenetic tree compared to other O. lateralis from Vietnam.

The examination of the new series of O. lateralis from Vietnam further revealed different ventral scale counts compared with data sorted by sex provided by Pope (1935) for O. lateralis from China: 182-186 ventrals in males studied by us from Vietnam versus 161-173 ventrals in males from China, and 166-186 ventrals in females studied by us from Vietnam versus 159-162 in females from China. The herein exemplarily counted maxillary teeth for Vietnamese O. lateralis (26-28, n = 4: 2 males, 2 females) agreed well with the known maxillary teeth count of the holotype from northern Vietnam (27); according to Pope (1935), who referred to Chinese O. lateralis, Mell (1930) and Fan (1931) only mentioned 18 and 18-20 maxillary teeth respectively, and Pope (1935) furthermore stated how difficult and uncertain this character is. The O. lateralis from Guangxi in southern China (Guo et al., 2012) included in the molecular tree (Fig. 5) also showed some genetic divergence towards Vietnamese O. lateralis. As recent taxonomic research in a semiaquatic squamate reptiles living in the Vietnam – China border region revealed distinct taxa to be involved (van Schingen et al., 2016), further taxonomic research of O. lateralis thus could be interesting and reaveal the presence of an undescrided species.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Anna Rauhaus (Cologne Zoo) for kindly arranging the plates and Hanh T. Ngo for laboratory assistance. Thanks also to two anonymous reviewers for commenting on a previous version of the manuscript. Field work in part was funded by Cologne Zoo (Germany).

REFERENCES

1.

Boulenger G.A. 1903. Descriptions of new snakes in the collection of the British Museum. Annals and Magazine of Natural History (7) 12: 350-354 Google Scholar

2.

Bourret R. 1936. Les serpents de l'Indochine. II. Catalogue systématique descriptif. Henri Basuyau et Cie, Toulouse, 505 pp. Google Scholar

3.

Bui M.Q., Nguyen A.M.T., von Haeseler A. 2013. Ultrafast approximation for phylogenetic bootstrap. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 1188-1195. Google Scholar

4.

Burbrink F.T., Lawson R., Slowinski J.B. 2000. Mitochondrial DNA phylogeography of the polytypic North American rat snake (Elaphe obsoleta): a critique of the subspecies concept. Evolution 54: 2107-2118. Google Scholar

5.

David P., Pham C.T., Nguyen T.Q., Ziegler T. 2011. A new species of the genus Opisthotropis Günther, 1872 (Squamata: Natricidae) from the highlands of Kon Tum Province, Vietnam. Zootaxa 2758: 43-56. Google Scholar

6.

Dowling H.G. 1951. A proposed standard system of counting ventrals in snakes. British Journal of Herpetology 1: 97-99. Google Scholar

7.

Fan T.-H. 1931. Preliminary report of reptiles from Yaoshan, Kwangsi, China. Bulletin Department of Biology Sun Yatsen University 11: 1-154. Google Scholar

8.

Gawor A., Pham C.T., Nguyen T.Q., Nguyen T.T., Schmitz A., Ziegler T. 2016. The herpetofauna of the Bai Tu Long National Park, northeast Vietnam. Salamandra 52(1): 23-41. Google Scholar

9.

Guo P., Liu Q., Xu Y., Jiang K., Hou M., Ding L., Pyron R.A., Burbrink F.T. 2012. Out of Asia: natricine snakes support the Cenozoic Beringian Dispersal Hypothesis. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 63(3): 825-833. Google Scholar

10.

Hecht V.L., Pham C.T., Nguyen T.T., Nguyen T.Q., Bonkowski M., Ziegler T. 2013. First Report on the herpetofauna of Tay Yen Tu Nature Reserve, northeastern Vietnam. Biodiversity Journal 4(4): 507-552. Google Scholar

11.

Le M., Raxworthy C.J., McCord W.P., Mertz L. 2006. A molecular phylogeny of tortoises (Testudines: Testudinidae) based on mitochondrial and nuclear genes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 40: 517-531. Google Scholar

12.

Mell R. 1930. Beiträge zur Lurch- und Kriechtierfauna Kwangsi’s. 4. Schlangen. Sitzungsberichte Gesellschaft Naturfreunde Berlin 1929: 319-326. Google Scholar

13.

Nguyen S.V., Ho C.T., Nguyen T.Q. 2009. Herpetofauna of Vietnam. Edition Chimaira, Frankfurt am Main, 768 pp. Google Scholar

14.

Nguyen T.V., Nguyen T.Q., Pham C.T., Ziegler T. 2017. First country record of Opisthotropis maculosa Stuart & Chuaynkern, 2007 from Vietnam. Russian Journal of Herpetology (in press). Google Scholar

15.

Nguyen L.T., Schmidt H. A., von Haeseler A., Bui M.Q. 2015. IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum likelihood phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 32: 268-274. Google Scholar

16.

Pope C.H. 1935. The reptiles of China. Turtles, crocodilians, snakes, lizards. Natural History of Central Asia. Vol. X. American Museum of Natural History, New York, 604 pp. Google Scholar

17.

Posada D., Crandall K.A. 1998. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818. Google Scholar

18.

Ronquist F., Teslenko M., van der Mark P., Ayres D.L., Darling A., Höhna S., Larget B., Liu L., Suchard M.A., Huelsenbeck J.P. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61: 539-542. Google Scholar

19.

Smith M.A. 1943. The fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma. Reptilia and Amphibia. Vol. III. Serpentes. Taylor & Francis Ltd., London, xii, 583 pp. Google Scholar

20.

Stuart B.L., Chuaynkern Y. 2007. A new Opisthotropis (Serpentes: Colubridae: Natricinae) from Northeastern Thailand. Current Herpetology 26(1): 35-40. Google Scholar

21.

Swofford D.L. 2001. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (* and Other Methods), version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar

22.

Teynié A., Lottier A., David P., Nguyen T.Q., Vogel G. 2013. A new species of the genus Opisthotropis Günther, 1872 from northern Laos (Squamata: Natricidae). Zootaxa 3774(2): 165-182. Google Scholar

23.

Thompson J.D., Gibson T.J., Plewniak F., Jeanmougin F., Higgins D.G. 1997. The ClustalX windows interface: Flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research 25: 4876-4882. Google Scholar

24.

van Schingen M., Le M.D., Ngo H.T., Pham C.T., Ha Q.Q., Nguyen T.Q., Ziegler T. 2016. Is there more than one Crocodile Lizard? An integrative taxonomic approach reveals Vietnamese and Chinese Shinisaurus crocodilurus represent separate conservation and taxonomic units. Der Zoologische Garten, N.F. 85: 240-260. Google Scholar

25.

Yang J.-H., Sung Y.-H., Chan B.P.-L. 2013. A new species of the genus Opisthotropis Günther, 1872 (Squamata: Colubridae: Natricinae) from Guangdong Province, China. Zootaxa 3646(3): 289-296. Google Scholar

26.

Ziegler T., David P., Thanh V. N. 2008. A new natricine snake of the genus Opisthotropis from Tam Dao, Vinh Phuc Province, northern Vietnam (Squamata, Colubridae). Zoosystematics and Evolution 84(2): 197-203. Google Scholar

27.

Ziegler T., Rauhaus A., Tran T.D., Pham C.T., van Schingen M., Dang H.P. Le M.D., Nguyen T.Q. 2015. Die Amphibienund Reptilienfauna der Me-Linh-Biodiversitätsstation in Nordvietnam. Sauria 37(4): 11-44. Google Scholar
Thomas Ziegler, Tim N. Ziegler, Julia Peusquens, Patrick David, Thanh N. Vu, Cuong T. Pham, Truong Q. Nguyen, and Minh D. Le "Expanded morphological definition and molecular phylogenetic position of the Tam Dao mountain stream keelback Opisthotropis tamdaoensis (Squamata: Natricidae) from Vietnam," Revue suisse de Zoologie 124(2), 377-389, (1 January 2020). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.893551
Accepted: 25 July 2017; Published: 1 January 2020
KEYWORDS
molecular phylogeny
morphology
Opisthotropis lateralis
redescription
Back to Top