Oxynetra stangelandi Grishin & Burns, new species, from high elevations of Area de Conservacion Guanacaste (ACG) in northwestern Costa Rica, is most similar to Oxynetra hopfferi Staudinger, known from mountains of central and southern Costa Rica and western Panama. These hesperiid species differ mainly in body color pattern and in DNA barcodes. We compare their barcodes, nucleotide by nucleotide, together with barcodes of a congener and a species of the related genus Olafia, and use the barcode data to show phylogenetic relationships. We describe the new species, its discovery, its male and female genitalia, and its life history as a cloud forest herbivore of Prunus annularis (Rosaceae). In ACG, no other skippers feed on this plant species, and no other skippers of the tribe Pyrrhopygini feed on plants in the family Rosaceae. Various stages of O. stangelandi belong to mimicry complexes. Although our adults, which are reared from wild-caught caterpillars, are split between the sexes (4 males, 6 females), there are scarcely any females of Oxynetra in the world's museums.
Some butterflies depart from the usual lepidopteran show of opaque scales by evolving wings that are partly to fully transparent. Among skipper butterflies of the tribe Pyrrhopygini, many of which are gaudy, certain members of the genus Oxynetra caught our attention owing not only to extensive alar transparency but also to a troubling lack of taxonomic transparency.
The neotropical genus Oxynetra C. & R. Felder, 1862—proposed for O. semihyalina C. & R. Felder, 1862—currently comprises three species: O. semihyalina, O. confusa Staudinger, 1888, and O. hopfferi Staudinger, 1888. Both sexes of O. semihyalina, and especially of O. confusa, have extensively transparent wings, with forewings whose hyalinity is primarily medial but also subapical. In males of O. hopfferi, the medial hyalinity is reduced and the subapical hyalinity is lacking; but in females, there is none at all—the wings are entirely black. Given such extreme sexual dimorphism, it is not surprising that the female was originally described as a distinct species in its own genus, Dis annulatus Mabille, 1889. However, Godman and Salvin (1893) correctly synonymized genus Dis with Oxynetra and argued that the female of O. annulatus might prove to be that of O. hopfferi. Evans (1951) formally synonymized O. annulatus with O. hopfferi, an action that prevails (Mielke 2005).
Unlike its congeners, O. hopfferi is rare in collections, as are females of Oyxnetra generally (e.g., for BMNH, Evans  records 99 males of O. semihyalina and 44 males of O. confusa, mainly from Bolivia and especially Peru, but no females of either species). After 22 years of intensive continuous collecting and rearing in Area de Conservacion Guanacaste (ACG) in northwestern Costa Rica (Burns & Janzen 2001, Janzen et al. 2009), the first O. hopfferi-like specimen surfaced in July 2001, too late to appear in the detailed account (then in press) of pyrrhopygine skippers of ACG (Burns & Janzen 2001). This unforeseen species adds a new larval foodplant, Prunus annularis Koehne, and a new family, Rosaceae, to those eaten by Pyrrhopygini in ACG (Janzen & Hallwachs 2012).
That 2001 specimen, a male (voucher code 01-SRNP-6995), has—in contrast to the multi-orange-banded abdominal pattern of male O. hopfferi—a single orange band on abdominal tergum III. However, one (02-SRNP-23283) of two males reared in 2002, has, in addition to the bold orange band on tergum III, some sparse orange scaling on tergum IV; and the male (03-SRNP-3638) reared in 2003 has a scattering of 23 orange scales there. Despite such individual variation, the general effect is one band.
Multiple rearings of phenotypically similar wildcaught caterpillars unequivocally associate the dimorphic sexes, and DNA barcoding confirms the association. Barcodes of all 10 ACG specimens are identical (Fig. S1 of Janzen et al. 2011).
In early 2011, when Mike Stangeland began preparing photographs of reared Oxynetra males for the Butterflies of America (BoA), website http://butterfliesofamerica.com (Warren et al. 2012), he noticed that they differed from photographs of O. hopfferi males in other collections and raised the possibility of a new taxon. Subsequent investigation, assisted by many collaborators, indicates that the northwestern Costa Rica specimens represent an undescribed species, closely related to, but distinct from, O. hopfferi.
Description . Size: Male smaller than female. Forewing length (mm) of four males: 17.1, 18.1, 18.2, 18.3; of six females: 20.2, 20.7, 21.1, 21.5, 22.2, 22.6. (These measurements will average less than those of wild-caught adults, because conditions and duration of rearing often stunt growth.)
Nudum of antennal club: Fewer segments in male than in female. Number of segments in left nudum/right nudum of four males: 20/20, 20/20, ?/20, 22/22; of five females: 24/23, 23/25, 25/25, ?/25, 26/25. (Number of nudum segments not correlated with wing length.)
Facies: Pronounced sexual dimorphism:
Facies, male: Hindwing (HW) narrow and elongate; forewing (FW) extending well beyond it. Outer wing margin very slightly concave at cell CuA2-1A+2A of FW and at cells between veins M1 and M3 of HW. Dorsal and ventral FW (including fringe) brownish-black with blue/purple sheen (except for some whitish fringe scales at cell CuA2-1A+2A in three of four males), and with bold, median, wide, straight-edged, hyaline band from anterior edge of discal cell to vein 1A+2A; band divided into three large, aligned parts by dark-scaled veins CuA1 and CuA2; its outer edge evened by tiny, triangular, hyaline wedge at very base of cell M3-C uA1. Dorsal HW concolorous with FW (except fringe around tornus white), with two median, large, roughly rectangular, aligned, hyaline spots (in cell Sc+R1-R s and discal cell), separated by vein Rs, and suggesting continuation of FW band; three of four males with small, postmedian pair of hyaline spots in proximal ends of cells M3-CuA1 and CuA1-CuA2 (these spots expressed only ventrally in fourth male). Ventral HW similar to dorsal, but with wing base white and with two small, opaque, white spots in cell CuA2-1A+2A, one median and one submarginal (the latter spot looking more or less dual). Scaled antenna black; nudum medium brown. Head and body primarily brownish-black with aqua to blue/purple sheen, but marked as follows: two tiny white spots at base of antenna and one small spot at dorsoposterior margin of eye; first and second segments of palpus ventrally white, with white continuing, without interruption, in midventral strip as far as base of foreleg, and thereafter in separate midventral patches between bases of midlegs, of hindlegs, and at posterior margin of each sternite (some abdominal patches resembling transverse dashes and progressively decreasing in size). Large orange spot on anterior 40% of tegula. Orange band (with slight middorsal notch in anterior margin) across tergum III.
Facies, female: Remarkably different from male. HW relatively broad and rounded. Both wings uniformly brownish-black, above and below, with strong, purplish, metallic sheen (imparting “greasy” appearance). HW fringe narrowly white, FW fringe variably so (never at apex). White head and body markings of male greatly reduced or not expressed: spot at dorsoposterior margin of eye present, but only one white spot at base of antenna (on anterior side); ventral white of basal segments of palpus narrow, and not continued posteriorly, except for short, vestigial, midventral dashes at posterior margin of abdominal segments. Tegula all black. Conspicuous orange band across tergum III, as in male, except for narrow middorsal break.
Genitalia, male (Fig. 3a): Tegumen about twice as wide as high and about twice as long as uncus; supported ventrally, on each side, about halfway along its length; distal end with small middorsal knob, flanked by pair of distally directed, blunt, rudimentary projections. Uncus narrower than tegumen and tapering slightly toward distal end; distal end with medial V-shaped notch; short fat prong on either side of notch curved ventrad, terminating in blunt point. Valva with body prominently humped and appearing triangular in lateral view; distal division narrowed, tapered, curved dorsad, and dentate along anterior edge; ventral inner side of valva giving rise to two dorsal projections: proximal one low, less obvious, and wide, with uneven, finely dentate dorsal edge; distal one long, narrow, curved mediad, dentate, and sharply pointed. Saccus very short. Penis more or less uniform in diameter and conspicuously humped near distal end; no cornuti.
Genitalia, female (Fig. 5): Lamella postvaginalis—lying just below, and extending well distad of, ovipositor lobes—shaped like wide flat paddle, expanding somewhat in thickness and width along its length; distal end rounded, with slight medial notch. Lamella antevaginalis narrowly extending dorsad, from dorsolateral rim of ostium bursae, almost as far as dorsal edge of ovipositor lobes; its surface indented and appearing wavy at some angles. Ostium bursae remarkably large, elliptical, and well-sclerotized, forming posteriorly directed cup. Ductus bursae membranous, initially about half diameter of ostium bursae, then abruptly decreasing in diameter, changing direction, and leaving blind pocket at anterior end of large-diameter portion of ductus bursae. Ductus seminalis joining ductus bursae middorsally, slightly anteriad of sclerotized ostium bursae cup. Corpus bursae membranous.
Holotype (Fig. 1a): Male, voucher code 02-SRNP-23284, Sendero Derrumbe, 1220 m, Sector Cacao, Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Costa Rica, lat 10.92918, long -85.46426, collected in penultimate larval instar by Harry Ramirez [deposited in USNM]. Yellow label reads “LEGS AWAY/FOR DNA.”
DNA barcode (633 bp) of holotype:
AACTTTATATTTTATATTTGGAATTTGAGCAGGAATAATTGGAA CTTCATTAAGATTACTAATTCGAACTGAATTAGGTACCCCCGG ATCTTTAATTGGAAATGACCAAATTTATAACACTATTGTAACAG CTCATGCATTTATTATAATTTTTTTTATAGTTATACCTATTATAA TTGGAGGATTTGGAAATTGATTAGTTCCTTTAATATTAGGAGC TCCAGATATAGCTTTCCCTCGAATAAATAATATAAGATTTTGAT TATTACCTCCATCTTTAACTCTTTTAATTTCAAGAAGAATTGTA GAAAACGGTGCTGGAACTGGATGAACAGTTTACCCCCCTCT TTCTTCTAATATTGCCCATCAAGGAACCTCCGTTGATTTAGCT ATTTTTTCTCTTCATTTAGCTGGAATTTCTTCAATTTTAGGGG CTATTAATTTTATTACAACAATTATTAATATACGAATTAAAAATT TATCTTTTGACCAAATACCTCTTTTTGTGTGAGCCGTAGGAAT TACTGCATTATTATTATTATTATCTTTACCTGTATTAGCAGGTG CTATTACTATACTTTTAACAGACCGAAATATTAATACTTCCTTT TTTGATCCTGCAGGAGGAGGAGA
Paratypes (Figs. 1b, 2a–h): 3 males (voucher codes 01-SRNP-6995, 02-SRNP-23283, 03-SRNP-3638), 6 females (02-SRNP-23109, -23110, -23285, -23286, -23540, -24529) from Sendero Toma Agua, 1140 m; Estacion Cacao, 1150 m; and Sendero Derrumbe, 1220 m— all in Sector Cacao, Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Costa Rica [deposited in USNM]. For further details, see Janzen & Hallwachs 2012.
Larval habitat; elevation range: Cloud forest. Type specimens collected at 1140, 1150, and 1220 m.
Foodplant: Prunus annularis (Rosaceae).
Etymology: Named in honor of Mike Stangeland—a research associate of the McGuire Center for Lepidoptera and Biodiversity at the Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, and the photo editor and administrator of BoA—who has prepared >100,000 butterfly images for online display.
Diagnosis. Males of O. stangelandi, with one orange band across tergum III, differ from males of sister species O. hopfferi, with their five-banded abdomen (and even from hesperiids generally [except for O. semihyalina, which has a single, pale orange band]). In both sexes, the orange of the abdominal bands is redder in O. stangelandi than it is in O. hopfferi. Males of O. stangelandi lack O. hopfferi's narrow streak of whitish hairlike scales on the dorsal HW near the middle of cell 1A+2A–A3 and parallel to its bounding veins. The number of nudum segments in O. stangelandi (ranging in four males from 20 to 22) may exceed that of O. hopfferi (whose three inspected males have only 17, 18, and 19 segments).
In females of O. stangelandi, as opposed to those of O. hopfferi, the ventral white on palpal segments one and two is relatively restricted and narrow, and the adjacent thoracic venter is black instead of white. The black middorsal break in the orange band across tergum III appears slightly narrower in O. stangelandi than in O. hopfferi. Wing fringes are predominantly white in O. stangelandi but, with one exception, not in O. hopfferi.
The mitochondrial nucleotide sequence in the Cterminal segment of CO1 (i.e., the DNA barcode) of O. stangelandi is unique; and it differs from those of O. hopfferi by 2.6% to 3.2%. This critical distinction is analyzed in detail below, where it is also treated in a broader context.
Genitalia. Do male genitalia distinguish O. stangelandi from O. hopfferi? Close, side by side comparison of the dissections that appear in Fig. 3, as well as another, reveals various small differences. These include a larger middorsal knob at the distal end of the tegumen, a more massive, more dentate distal division of the valva, a longer, more dentate pointed projection from the inner side of the valva, and a longer penile hump in O. hopfferi than in O. stangelandi. Judging from over half a century of perusing countless skipper genitalia, Burns cautions that these apparent differences may reflect nothing more than individual variation. No matter how simple their form, genitalia vary appreciably within a population; and individual variation generally becomes more evident as genitalic complexity increases. Given our minimal genitalia samples—two complete dissections of O. stangelandi and one of O. hopfferi, plus photographs of valval exteriors (in situ, and partly exposed by dusting) of two other specimens of O. hopfferi—we cannot identify interspecific differences with certainty. A difference we once considered potentially valuable in telling O. stangelandi and O. hopfferi apart involves the dorsal margin of the valval body, distal to its pronounced hump: in lateral view, this margin makes an even, concave curve down to a slightly upturned, rounded, protruding base in O. hopfferi (Fig. 3b) but a straight line to a sharp, wide, basal angle in O. stangelandi (Fig. 3a). No such difference marks the second example of O. stangelandi.
However, relatively minor genitalic differences may mean more in Oxynetra than they do in many other genera, because the genitalia of all four species are conservative variations on a single complex theme. Even though the facies of O. semihyalina and O. confusa (Fig. 6) differ considerably from those of O. hopfferi and O. stangelandi (Figs. 1, 2), their genitalia (Fig. 4) do not. Features showing interspecific variation between O. semihyalina and O. confusa include the distal division of the valva and the penile hump, which are features noted above that may distinguish O. stangelandi from O. hopfferi. The differences in the distal division of their valvae (compare the oblique views of genitalia in Figs. 3a and 3b) look especially promising for species discrimination. (For an example of intraspecific variation in genitalic form, compare photos of the male genitalia of O. confusa in Orellana 2008:fig. 212 with Fig. 4b.)
Barcode differences and intrageneric phylogeny. We obtained barcode sequences for the entire type series of O. stangelandi and for three O. hopfferi specimens. All 10 of our O. stangelandi sequences are identical within their sequenced length, and all specimens are from the same locality. Sequences of the three O. hopfferi specimens differ from each other by 2 or 4 nucleotides, which amounts to 0.3% and 0.6% intraspecific differences (Fig. 7a); and these three specimens are from different localities within Costa Rica. The O. stangelandi sequence differs from those of O. hopfferi by 17, 19, and 21 nucleotides (2.6%, 2.9%, 3.2% differences). Differences of this magnitude are consistent with interspecific distances found in other similar sets of hesperiid species. Moreover, in some unquestionably valid cryptic species, interspecific distances are much smaller: in large ACG samples of Perichares, for example, P. adela (Hewitson) differs from P. prestoeaphaga Burns by about 0.6%, from P. geonomaphaga Burns by about 0.8%, and P. prestoeaphaga from P. geonomaphaga by about 0.7% (Burns et al. 2008). Indeed, some closely related skipper species may differ by only 1 to 3 nucleotides (Burns et al. 2007).
To compare the differences between O. stangelandi and O. hopfferi to differences between them and species that morphologically appear related but more distant, we queried BLAST search < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast> for publically available sequences most similar to that of O. stangelandi and obtained barcodes of O. confusa and Olafia roscius (Hopffer, 1874) (Fig. 7a). Olafia is the genus most similar to Oxynetra; and its sole species, Ol. roscius, was previously treated as Oxynetra (Evans 1951). The O. stangelandi sequence differs from sequences of O. confusa and Ol. roscius by 35 and 36 nucleotides, respectively (around 5.5%). Though smaller, the barcode distances between O. stangelandi and O. hopfferi are still comparable to those between O. stangelandi and O. confusa, and even to those between Oxynetra and Olafia.
Although the 654 base pair sequence is generally too short for reliable phylogenetic inference, we applied four standard phylogenetic reconstruction programs offered at http://www.phylogeny.fr to our genetic data. The resulting trees (Fig. 7b–e) are topologically identical and show O. stangelandi and O. hopfferi as sister species, in agreement with the phenotypic data. Branch lengths in the trees in Fig. 7b, c, and d are to scale and graphically show the extent of intraspecific variation in O. hopfferi and how it scales to interspecific differences.
Distribution, ecology, life history, behavior, and mimicry. So far, O. stangelandi is known only from the 1,000–1,500 m zone of cloud forest covering the top of Volcan Cacao (centered by latitude 10.93328, longitude -85.45729) in central ACG. The enormous rearing project in ACG, which is often coupled with mass barcoding of the reared specimens, has led to the description of many new insect species solely from ACG material; but this does not mean that these species are extremely limited in their geographic distribution.
The shrub-treelet foodplant, Prunus annularis (Rosaceae), occurs throughout the understory and edges of this dense forest and reaches a height of 5 m. Caterpillars of O. stangelandi have been found feeding only on this species; and since almost all other species of plants in this habitat have been intensively searched for over 20 years (Janzen & Hallwachs 2012) for any and all caterpillars (>30,000 records), we assume that O. stangelandi is monophagous. Because it is not known to share this foodplant with other species of Hesperiidae, we infer that empty hesperiid larval shelters on P. annularis belong to this species.
The first individual of O. stangelandi (01-SRNP-6995) was found as a pupa (2 July 2001; eclosed 26 July 2001) in a leaf shelter it had made in the top of an unknown 60 cm tall understory sapling below a 3–4 m tall P. annularis. Skipper caterpillars often construct pupal shelters on plants adjacent to, but different from, their foodplant. A year later, various instars of O. stangelandi were found on P. annularis in the general vicinity (Janzen & Hallwachs 2012), although at least 10 years of search of this foodplant prior to 2001 had not turned up any hesperiid larval shelters. Continued explicit and haphazard search of P. annularis foliage in the same general area from 2003–2011 has yielded only one more caterpillar (03-SRNP-3638), plus one parasitized pupa on a non-foodplant. Oxynetra stangelandi is clearly a very low density species in the 1–3 m height range easily searched by parataxonomists; however, the specimens encountered may represent only the bottom of a higher height distribution of the caterpillars. Dates of adult eclosion range from late July to late December, but the sample is too small to estimate annual phenology. A female caterpillar (02-SRNP-23285) found as second instar on 19 July 2002 and reared in a protective net placed over the foodplant, pupated 30 August 2002 and eclosed 19 September 2002 (at 1220 m elevation).
Oxynetra stangelandi caterpillars have the hairy, strikingly yellow- and black-banded body and hairy head (Fig. 8a–d, f–m) characteristic of many pyrrhopygine skipper caterpillars (Burns & Janzen 2001; Janzen et al. 2009). They are no doubt part of a generally aposematic mimicry system involving hundreds of other ACG caterpillars. Likewise, orange eyespots on the black head of O. stangelandi caterpillars place them in a mimicry complex that comprises hundreds of species of ACG caterpillars exhibiting a great diversity of false eyespot patterns (Janzen et al. 2010). Moreover, the mature pupa is basically white (with small orange and black spots, Fig. 8e, s–z), resembling the white pupae of many other shelter-inhabiting ACG skipper species that mimic pupae attacked by fungi. Pupae that are fungal victims usually become white, highly inedible, and even gustatorially dangerous (see images in Janzen & Hallwachs 2012). In the newly molted O. stangelandi pupa, the head, pronotum, and appendages, including wings, look more or less orange and contrast with dull maroon dorsolateral bands on the cream to tan ground color of the rest of the body (Fig. 8n–r). After about two days, a white waxy layer is exuded over the surface, giving the pupa the white appearance that remains until eclosion.
Although no adult O. stangelandi has been observed in the field, its behavior, when newly eclosed in a large rearing container, is unusual. Newly eclosed ACG hesperiids, in many thousands of cases and across more than 400 species, hold their wings together over their back during hardening, and then usually keep them in that position while walking and perching in the rearing containers. However, both sexes of O. stangelandi harden their wings in the position shown in Fig. 2hl and hold them that way while walking with the characteristic gait and slight up-and-down wing motion of a large ctenuchine arctiid moth (many species of which are diurnal, brightly colored, transparent-winged, and widely believed to be chemistry-based aposematic or Hymenoptera mimics). Though aware that the male in Fig. 2hl must be a hesperid that he had photographed repeatedly as a developing larva and pupa, Janzen had to look twice to reassure himself that it was not a contaminating arctiid whose cocoon had inadvertently come in with food foliage. While the striking colors of the male may serve in courtship and the black color of the female in heat absorption in cold cloud forest, these colors also function in at least two mimicry rings.
History of discovery. We initially addressed Stangeland's suggestion that the reared ACG material might not be O. hopfferi by procuring a specimen whose facies closely match those of the holotype (male) of O. hopfferi (Fig. 1c). The new specimen (voucher code 97-ZFuentes-055 [deposited in USNM]) is a male that eclosed from a pupa collected in 1997 in Peñas Blancas, Monteverde, Puntarenas Province, Costa Rica, which is about 100 km southeast of ACG and considerably closer to the O. hopfferi type locality (Chiriqui). This male has the characteristic O. hopfferi abdomen with five orange bands, as well as a hindwing with a short, narrow white streak in cell 1A+2A–3A. One of its legs, sacrificed to DNA sequencing, yielded a barcode that differed by 2.6% from the uniform barcodes previously obtained for all ten ACG specimens. Subsequent comparison of genitalia gave the uncertain result discussed above.
Our need of a larger sample of O. hopfferi to assess variation was frustrated by the rarity of this species in collections. In addition to the Monteverde specimen (Fig. 2k) and the holotypes of O. hopfferi (Fig. 1c) and D. annulatus (Fig. 1d), we inspected four male specimens, all from Chiriqui, Panama (1, BMNH; 2, ZMHB; 1, MTD). With the help of Kim Garwood and Isidro Chacón, we obtained photographs of four more specimens: three males (from Chiriqui, Panama [OMDZUP], Fig. 2l; and Puntarenas, Costa Rica [INBio], Fig. 2i–j) and one female (from Chiriqui, Panama [OMDZUP], Fig. 2m). The facies of our sample of nine males and two females of O. hopfferi from southern Costa Rica and western Panama do not vary significantly (except that fringe color is dark in the Dis annulatus holotype and largely white in the other female).
Oxynetra annulatus, originally described (in genus Dis) from an almost black female with one orange band on her abdomen, has been synonymized with O. hopfferi. Were O. annulatus the female of the ACG entity, the latter would assume that name. The holotype (Fig. 1d) exhibits a white prothoracic venter devoid of dark scales. The females of O. stangelandi have a fully black thoracic venter, concolorous with the rest of the body (Figs. 1b, 2av–ev). Moreover, they have narrower white areas on the palpi below and a narrower dark middorsal break in the abdominal orange band, which is redder than in the O. annulatus holotype; and they have white wing fringes, in contrast to the mostly dark fringes of the O. annulatus holotype. Holotypes of both O. hopfferi and O. annulatus are from Chiriqui, Panama. We agree that O. annulatus is indeed a female of O. hopfferi. Even without knowing the locality, it is possible to associate the O. annulatus female with the O. hopfferi male, as they both exhibit prominently developed white areas on the venter, contrasting to more restricted distribution of white in both sexes of O. stangelandi; and oranger bands on the abdomen, differing from redder bands in both sexes of O. stangelandi. These differences hold up well in available samples of the two species: 9 males, 2 females of O. hopfferi, and 4 males, 6 females of O. stangelandi.
Oxynetra illustrations in historic works are illuminating. Illustrations in Godman and Salvin (1879–1901) are usually more accurate than are those in Draudt (1921). However, for O. hopfferi, the white streak near the anal fold of the hindwing of the holotype does not appear in Godman and Salvin (vol. 3, pl. 74, fig. 18, reproduced here, Fig. 2o). Although the Draudt illustration (1921: pl. 165, row b, reproduced here, Fig. 2q) of apparently the same specimen depicts this streak clearly, it lacks the small, transparent, triangular wedge at the base of forewing cell M3- CuA1 and shows 7 orange bands (6 major and 1 minor) instead of “5 bright orange-red transverse band[s] on the dorsum of the abdomen” as specified in the text (Draudt 1921:849). The Draudt illustration was probably drawn from the illustration in the original description (Staudinger 1888: pl. 99, as felderi, reproduced here, Fig. 2n), because the Staudinger illustration also shows 7 orange bands.
Collaboration among researchers from five countries has resulted in rearing and recognition of a new species of Oxynetra that differs from its sister species, O. hopfferi, in body pattern and perhaps in number of antennal nudum segments and in male genitalia. Barcode differences (2.6% to 3.2%) clearly separate the two species. The male and female associations made through rearing and DNA sequencing of O. stangelandi, and similar sexual dimorphism in the facies of both O. stangelandi and O. hopfferi, indirectly support the synonymy of O. annulatus (described from a female) with O. hopfferi (described from a male).
Acronyms of Museums
The Natural History Museum, London, England INBio Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad, Santo Domingo de Heredia, Costa Rica
Senckenberg Museum für Tierkunde, Dresden, Germany
O. H. H. Mielke, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil, together with the collection of Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil
National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA
Zoologisches Museum, Humboldt Universität, Berlin, Germany
We are grateful to Mike Stangeland for bringing phenotypic differences of the new species to our attention; Blanca Huertas and David Lees (BMNH), Wolfram Mey (ZMHB), and Matthias Nuss (MTD) for providing unrestricted access to specimens under their care and help in the collections; Gerardo Lamas and Bernard Hermier for sharing images of Oxynetra type specimens; Kim Garwood and Isidro A. Chacón for providing photographs of Oxynetra hopfferi specimens; Ernst Brockmann for barcode sequences of Oxynetra confusa and Olafia roscius; Donald Harvey for dissecting genitalia; Karie Darrow for photographing genitalia of four Oxynetra species, plus adults of the two South American species; Zobeida Fuentes and ACG parataxonomists Harry Ramirez, Mariano Pereira, Dunia Garcia, Manuel Pereira, and Freddy Quesada for finding and rearing Oxynetra caterpillars and for identifying their foodplant; Isidro A. Chacón for a specimen of O. hopfferi; many of the above as well as Andy Warren for discussing various aspects of this study; and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments. The study has been supported by U.S. National Science Foundation grants BSR 9024770 and DEB 9306296, 9400829, 9705072, 0072730, 0515699, and grants from the Wege Foundation, International Conservation Fund of Canada, Jessie B. Cox Charitable Trust, Blue Moon Fund, Guanacaste Dry Forest Conservation Fund, Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, and University of Pennsylvania (DHJ); by the Government of Canada through Genome Canada and the Ontario Genomics Institute, and by NSERC Canada (MH).