Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 October 1996 Immunocytochemical Investigation of a Salmonid Olfactory System-Specific Protein in the Kokanee Salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka)
Hideaki Kudo, Hiroshi Ueda, Kohei Yamauchi
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Immunocytochemical and immunoelectron microscopic localizations of a salmonid olfactory system-specific protein (N24) were investigated in the olfactory system (the olfactory epithelium, the olfactory nerve and the olfactory bulb) of kokanee salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) by using a specific antiserum to N24. N24 immunoreactivities were observed in the cytoplasm of ciliated and microvillous olfactory receptor cells but were not observed in the supporting and the basal cells in the olfactory epithelium. Gold particles showing immunoreactivities for N24 were scattered in the cytoplasm of the dendrites of olfactory receptor cells. Some particles were concentrated on vesicular structures, but none were observed in the membrane of olfactory receptor cells. N24 immunoreactive axons were terminated at the glomerular layer near the mitral cells in the olfactory bulb. In an olfactory rosettectomy experiment, N24 immunoreactivity in the olfactory bulb vanished fifteenth day after the excision of the olfactory rosette. These results reveal that the olfactory receptor cells produce N24 which exists in both dendrites and axons of the olfactory receptor cells, and suggest that N24 may participate in neuromodulation in the olfactory system of kokanee salmon.

INTRODUCTION

It is now widely accepted that information concerning unique odors characteristic of a maternal river are imprinted in juvenile anadromous salmonid fish during their downstream migration, and that adult fish evoke these memories during their homing migration (Hasler and Wisby, 1951; Hasler and Scholz, 1983). Therefore the olfactory system, including the olfactory epithelium, olfactory nerve and olfactory bulb presumably play an important role in both imprinting and discrimination of maternal river odors. However, few biochemical studies have been done to investigate basic relations between the function and the molecular components of the olfactory system in salmonids.

There are numerous examples in the literature that indicate a close relation between olfactory-specific proteins and the function of the olfactory system in higher vertebrates (Lancet, 1986; Anholt, 1989; Margolis and Getchell, 1991). Several olfactory-specific proteins or their cDNAs have been identified and used as molecular markers to study olfactory function, such as olfactory marker protein (OMP; Margolis, 1972; Kott et al., 1992), odorant-binding protein (OBP: Pelosi and Maida, 1990), olfactory receptor, Golf, type III adenylate cyclase (AC), cAMP gated channel (Reed, 1992), and Olf-1 (Wang and Reed, 1993). The immunocytochemical localization of these olfactory-specific proteins; OMP (Monti Graziadei et al., 1977), OBP (Pevsner et al., 1988), Golf, AC (Menco et al., 1992), and Olf-1 (Wang and Reed, 1993), have also been reported in the olfactory system of several vertebrates other than salmonids. For teleosts, one immunocytochemical study of OMP has been reported in the olfactory system of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Riddle and Oakley, 1992). The cDNAs encoding olfactory receptors have also been identified in the channel catfish (Ngai et al., 1993).

Recently, we identified a 24 kDa protein (N24) in the olfactory system of kokanee salmon, O. nerka (Shimizu et al., 1993), the first olfactory-specific protein reported in salmonids. It was shown by Western blot analysis that the amount of N24 was higher in fish in the maternal river than those in seawater at both times of imprinting in maternal river and homing to the maternal river. In our preliminary immunocytochemical experiment, localization of N24 was observed in the olfactory epithelium. However it was recognized that more intensive immunocytochemical study of N24 in the olfactory system was required.

In the present study, we examined localization of N24 in the olfactory system of kokanee salmon by means of immunocytochemical and immunoelectron microscopic techniques. Olfactory rosettectomy was also done to investigate the role of N24 in this system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals

One-year-old kokanee salmon were reared at Toya Lake Station, Faculty of Fisheries, Hokkaido University, in outdoor tanks supplied with a continuous flow of a spring water at ambient temperature and photoperiod (fork length 15.8-20.4 cm and body weight 39.3-92.0 g). From fish anaesthetized with ethyl p-aminobenzoate, the olfactory rosette including the olfactory epithelium and the forebrain including the olfactory nerve, the olfactory bulb and the telencephalon were isolated.

The streptavidin-biotin complex (sAB) method

Each tissue (3 male and 3 female) was fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in 0.1M phosphate buffer (PB; pH 7.2) overnight at 4°C, rinsed with 0.1M PB containing 10% sucrose, dehydrated through graded ethanol, and embedded in paraffin (Histosec; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Serial sections were cut at five micron on a microtome, mounted on a gelatin coated glass slide, and air-dried at 4°C. After deparaffinization and hydration, sections were blocked with 0.1% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in methanol for 15 min to destroy endogenous peroxidase, and rinsed with phosphate buffer saline (PBS). Sections were incubated with normal goat serum for 15 min and then incubated with a polyclonal antiserum to N24 (Shimizu et al., 1993; working dilution 1:7000) for 2 hr at room temperature (RT) in a moist chamber. After being rinsed with PBS, sections were reacted with biotinylated goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin (IgG; Vector, Burlingame, CA, USA) for 45 min, rinsed with PBS, and then reacted with streptavidin-conjugated peroxidase (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) for 30 min at RT. Sections were then treated with a freshly prepared diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (0.5 mg/ml) solution with 0.01% H2O2 for 10 min. After being dehydrated, sections were mounted with a cover glass by Entellan neu (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). As a control, normal rabbit serum was substituted for the anti-N24 serum. Sections adjacent to those used for the sAB method were stained with Delafield's hematoxylin and eosin.

Indirect immunofluorescence method

The procedures of fixation and embedding (3 male and 3 female) were similar to the sAB method. Ten micron serial sections were cut on a microtome, mounted on a gelatin coated glass slide, and air-dried at 4°C. After deparaffinization and hydration, sections were incubated with normal goat serum for 15 min and then incubated with the anti-N24 serum (working dilution 1:1000) for 2 hr at RT in a moist chamber. After being rinsed with PBS, sections were reacted with goat anti-rabbit IgG conjugated with fluorescein isothiocyanate or rhodamine (1:100, Cappel, Durham, NC, USA) for 1 hr at RT. Sections were mounted with a cover glass by 80% unfluorescence glycerol containing 1% 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (Aldrich, Milwaukee, WI, USA) in PBS. Sections were examined on a Carl Zeiss LSM 410 confocal laser scanning microscope.

Immunoelectron microscopy

For immunoelectron microscopy, small fragments of each tissue (3 male and 3 female) were fixed with 2% PFA-1% glutaraldehyde (GA) in 0.1 M PB overnight at 4°C, rinsed in 0.1 M PB containing 10% sucrose, dehydrated through graded ethanol series, and embedded in Lowicryl K4M (Polaron Equipment, Watford, England) which was polymerized at 4°C with an ultraviolet polymerizer (Dosaka EM, Kyoto, Japan). The IgG-gold technique (Ueda et al., 1993) was used for immunoelectron microscopic observation. Briefly, ultrathin sections were placed for 10 min on a drop containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS, immunoreacted with anti-N24 serum diluted at 1:10000 in 0.1% BSA-PBS for 2 hr, and reacted with goat anti-rabbit IgG-coated 15 nm colloidal gold (E-Y Labs, San mateo, CA, USA) diluted at 1:100 in 0.1% BSA-PBS for 1 hr. After rinsing first in PBS and subsequently in distilled water, the grids were stained with 5% uranyl acetate for 5 min, and examined on a Hitachi H7000 electron microscope. As a control, normal rabbit serum or PBS was substituted for polyclonal antiserum to N24.

Conventional electron microscopy

Small fragments of each tissue were fixed in 2% PFA-1% GA in 0.1 M PB, postfixed in 1% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M PB, and embedded in epoxy resin according to standard procedures. Ultrathin sections were stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and examined using a Hitachi H7000 electron microscope operated at 75 kV.

Olfactory rosettectomy experiment

Forty eight fish were anaesthetized with ethyl m-aminobenzoate methanesulfonate, and then the right olfactory rosette including the olfactory epithelium was excised using a electric haemostat (Micro 1D; Mizuho, Tokyo, Japan) from the olfactory pit. After being excised, the olfactory pit was sealed with gelatin. The olfactory rosettectomized fish were returned to indoor tanks supplied with a continuous flow of a spring water at ambient temperature and photoperiod. The olfactory bulbs (3 male and 3 female) were prepared for the sAB method on 0, 1, 3, 5, 7, 11, and 15 days following the olfactory rosettectomy. Horizontal sections were used in this experiment.

RESULTS

The olfactory epithelium

Figure 1 shows localizations of immunoreactivities for N24 using the sAB method (Fig. 1A) and the immunofluorescent method (Fig. 1C), Delafield's hematoxylin and eosin staining (Fig. 1B), and differential interference contract image (Fig. 1D) in the olfactory epithelium. Immunoreactivities for N24 were observed in the cytoplasm and the axon of the olfactory receptor cells (Fig. 1A, C). In particular, strong N24 immunoreactivities were detected in the dendrites of the olfactory receptor cells (Fig. 1C). In contrast, immunoreactivities for N24 were neither observed in the supporting cells nor the basal cells in the olfactory epithelium (Fig. 1 A, C).

Fig. 1.

Immunocytochemical localization of N24 in the olfactory epithelium of kokanee salmon using the sAB method (A) and Delafield's hematoxylin and eosin (B). Indirect immunofluorescent localizations of N24 (C), and differential interference contrast image (D) using a confocal laser scanning microscopy. AX, axons of olfactory receptor cells; BC, basal ceil; OE, olfactory epithelium; ORC, olfactory receptor cell; SC, supporting cell. Bar, 50 μm.

i0289-0003-13-5-647-f1.gif

At the electron microscopic level, gold particles showing immunoreactivities for N24 were scattered in the cytoplasm of the dendrites of both ciliated (Fig. 2A) and microvillous (Fig. 2C) olfactory receptor cells. Some particles were concentrated on vesicular structures of 40 nm in size which were observed by means of the conventional electron microscopy (Fig. 2B, D). However, gold particles were rarely observed in the membrane of olfactory receptor cells. In control sections, no specific immunoreactive gold particles were seen in the olfactory epithelium.

Fig. 2.

Immunoelectron microscopical demonstration of N24 (A, C) and conventional electron microscopic observation (B, D) in the ciliated (A, B) and microvillous (C, D) olfactory receptor cells of kokanee salmon. Arrowheads indicate vesicular structures. Bar, 500 nm.

i0289-0003-13-5-647-f2.gif

The olfactory bulb

Figure 3 shows immunofluorescent localizations of immunoreactivities for N24 (Fig. 3A, C), and differential interference contrast image (Fig. 3B, D) in sagittal section of the olfactory bulb. The immunoreactivities for N24 were observed in the olfactory bulb where the olfactory nerve had penetrated (Fig. 3A). N24 immunoreactive axons were terminated at the glomerular layer near the mitral cells (Fig. 3C).

Fig. 3.

Indirect immunofluorescent localizations of N24 (A, C) and differential interference contrast image (B, D) in the olfactory bulb of kokanee salmon using a confocal laser scanning microscopy. GL, glomerular layer; OB, olfactory bulb; ON, olfactory nerve. Arrowheads indicate the mitral cells. Bar, 50 μm.

i0289-0003-13-5-647-f3.gif

No prominent immunocytochemical differences between male and female were observed in the olfactory system.

The olfactory rosettectomy

Figure 4 shows changes in N24 immunoreactivity using the sAB method following olfactory rosettectomy. Initially (day 0), the immunoreactivites for N24 in the horizontal sections of the olfactory bulb were observed throughout the olfactory nerve and glomerular layer (Fig. 4A). On the fifth day after the olfactory rosettectomy, N24 immunoreactivity in the right olfactory bulb began to decrease (Fig. 4B). On the seventh and eleventh day after the olfactory rosettectomy, N24 immunoreactivity in the right olfactory bulb decreased gradually, and degeneration of the olfactory nerve was observed (Fig. 4C, D). On the fifteenth day after the olfactory rosettectomy, N24 immunoreactivity in the right olfactory bulb had completely disappeared (Fig. 4E). In contrast, N24 immunoreactivity in the left olfactory bulb showed no prominent changes during this experiment (Fig. 4A-E). The olfactory rosettectomy did not show any cytological differences between male and female.

Fig. 4.

Immunocytochemical changes in N24 immunoreactivity in the olfactory bulb. Horizontal section through the olfactory bulb 0 (A), 5 (B), 7 (C), 11 (D) and 15 (E) days after olfactory rosettectomy. Bar, 500 μm.

i0289-0003-13-5-647-f4.gif

DISCUSSION

The present study provides detailed immunocytochemical information on a salmonid olfactory system-specific protein (N24) in kokanee salmon. The distribution of N24 immuno-reactive axons in the olfactory bulb are generally consistent with results of tracing experiments using cobaltlysine or horseradish peroxidase methods in other salmonids (Bazer et al., 1987; Riddle and Oakley, 1992). It seemed reasonable to suppose that these axons were primary projections from the olfactory receptor cells in the olfactory epithelium (Satou, 1992).

The present immunocytochemical localizations of N24 in the olfactory system seem to be similar to the olfactory marker protein (OMP) immunoreactive sites in the olfactory system of rainbow trout (Riddle and Oakley, 1992). However, the molecular weights of N24 and OMP are about 24 kDa and 20 kDa, respectively, by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (Margolis, 1972; Shimizu et al., 1993), so antigenic recognition polypeptide bands of N24 and OMP could be different in the olfactory system.

Two morphologically distinct olfactory receptor cell types, ciliated and microvillous olfactory receptor cells, exist in teleosts (Zeiske et al., 1992). Gold particles showing immunoreactivites for N24 were observed in both cell types. Previous studies suggested that both olfactory receptor cells have separate olfactory functions; the microvillous olfactory receptor cell may play a major role in the chemical stimulus detection of socially-relevant odors and the ciliated olfactory receptor cell may play a role in feeding, recognition of the environmental conditions, and other olfaction (Wysocki and Meredith, 1987; Zielinski and Hara, 1988, 1992). N24 was involved in olfactory functions in common with the ciliated and the microvillous olfactory receptor cells.

Previous ultrastructural studies of the olfactory epithelium of rainbow trout following unilateral olfactory nerve section indicated that the olfactory nerve and receptor cell were degenerating seven days after the section, and had disappeared on the eighteenth and twenty-sixth day after this section in the olfactory epithelium (Zielinski and Hara, 1992). In the olfactory rosettectomy experiment, N24 immunoreactivity in the olfactory nerve of rostral olfactory bulb had vanished fifteenth day after the excision of the olfactory rosette. These results indicate that rapid enzymatic breakdown of N24 dose not occur in the olfactory bulb, and the time courses of actions of N24 may be the long-term type in the olfactory system. The long-term actions are representative for neuromodulators.

In the present study, N24 immunoreactivities were not localized in the membrane of olfactory receptor cells, indicating that N24 does not correlate with the membranous members of the olfactory signal transduction cascade molecules (the olfactory receptor, Golf, type Ml adenylate cyclase, cAMP gated channel; Reed, 1992). In mammals, the olfactory epithelium has recently been shown to possess high concentrations and unique types of biotransformation enzymes (Banger et al., 1993; Ben-Arie et al., 1993). These enzymes in the olfactory epithelium have been proposed to underlie the termination of odorant signals, as well as the protection of the olfactory receptor cells against airborne toxic compounds (Burchell, 1991). In fact, these enzymes functioning as neuromodulators were expressed in the olfactory epithelium in rainbow trout (Monod et al., 1994; Starcevic and Zielinski, 1995). N24 might also be linked to the olfactory signal transduction, as a neuromodulator.

Immunoreactivities for N24 were observed in the perikaryia of the olfactory receptor cells. This suggests that N24 is produced in the olfactory receptor cells, and transported to both dendrites and axons. However, the expression of the N24 encoding gene in the olfactory receptor cell remains to be established by means of an in situ hybridization technique. Studies are now underway in our laboratory investigating the cDNA cloning of N24. N24 is confirmed to be a useful molecular marker for studying the olfactory functions in salmonids. Further studies would reveal cytophysiological changes in the olfactory system during salmon migration, especially at the times of imprinting and homing.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Mr Fumiyoshi Ishidate, Carl Zeiss Co., Ltd., for his technical support of observation with laser scanning microscopy, Mr Hiroyuki Haruna and Mr Satoshi Yanagi, Toya Lake Station for Environmental Biology, for their technical assistance in this study, and Dr James R. Irvine, Fisheries and Oceans, Canada, for his critical reading of the manuscript. This study was supported in part by the Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan, and Research Fellowships of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science for Young Scientists.

REFERENCES

1.

RRH Anholt 1989. Molecular physiology of olfaction. Am J Physiol 257:C1043–C1054. Google Scholar

2.

KK Banger, EA Lock, and C Reed . 1993. The characterization of glutathione S-transferases from rat olfactory epithelium. Biochem J 290:199–204. Google Scholar

3.

GT Bazer, SOE Ebbesson, JB Reynolds, and RP Bailey . 1987. A cobaltlysine study of primary olfactory projections in king salmon fry (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Walbaum). Cell Tissue Res 248:499–503. Google Scholar

4.

N Ben-Arie, M Khen, and D Lancet . 1993. Glutathione S-transferases in rat olfactory epithelium: purification, molecular properties and odorant biotransformation. Biochem J 292:379–384. Google Scholar

5.

B Burchell 1991. Turning on and turning off the sense of smell. Nature 350:16–17. Google Scholar

6.

AD Hasler and AT Scholz . 1983. Olfactory Imprinting and Homing in Salmon. Springer-Verlag. Berlin. Google Scholar

7.

AD Hasler and WJ Wisby . 1951. Discrimination of stream odors by fishes and relation to parent stream behavior. Am Naturalist 85:223–238. Google Scholar

8.

JN Kott, H Vickland, XM Dong, and LE Westrum . 1992. Development of olfactory marker protein and tyrosine hydroxylase immunoreactivity in the transplanted rat olfactory bulb. Exp Neurol 115:132–136. Google Scholar

9.

D Lancet 1986. Vertebrate olfactory reception. Annu Rev Neurosci 9:329–355. Google Scholar

10.

FL Margolis 1972. A brain protein unique to the olfactory bulb. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 69:1221–1224. Google Scholar

11.

FL Margolis and TV Getchell . 1991. Receptors: current status and future directions. In “Perfumers: Art, Science and Technology. ” Ed by P Muller and D Lamparsky . Elsevier Applied Science Publishers. Essex. pp. 481–498. Google Scholar

12.

BPhM Menco, RC Bruch, B Dau, and W Danho . 1992. Ultrastructural localization of olfactory transduction components: the G protein subunit Golf and type III adenylyl cyclase. Neuron 8:441–453. Google Scholar

13.

G Monod, D Saucier, E Perdu-Durand, M Diallo, J-P Cravedi, and L Astic . 1994. Biotransformation enzyme activities in the olfactory organ of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Immunocytochemical localization of cytochrome P4501A1 and its induction by β-naphthoflavone. Fish Physiol Biochem 13:433–444. Google Scholar

14.

GA Monti Graziadei, FL Margolis, JW Harding, and PPC Graziadei . 1977. Immunocytochemistry of the olfactory marker protein. J Histochem Cytochem 25:1311–1316. Google Scholar

15.

J Ngai, MM Dowling, L Buck, R Axel, and A Chess . 1993. The family of genes encoding odorant receptor in the channel catfish. Cell 72:657–666. Google Scholar

16.

P Pelosi and R Maida . 1990. Odorant binding proteins in vertebrates and insect: similarities and possible common function. Chem Senses 15:205–215. Google Scholar

17.

J Pevsner, PM Hwang, PB Sklar, JC Venable, and SH Snyder . 1988. Odorant-binding protein and its mRNA are localized to lateral nasal glands implying a carrier function. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 85:2383–2387. Google Scholar

18.

RR Reed 1992. Signaling pathways in odorant detection. Neuron 8:205–209. Google Scholar

19.

DR Riddle and B Oakley . 1992. Immunocytochemical identification of primary olfactory afferents in rainbow trout. J Comp Neurol 324:575–589. Google Scholar

20.

M Satou 1992. Synaptic organization of the olfactory bulb and its central projection. In “Fish Chemoreception. ” Ed by Hara TJ Great Britain at Univ Press. Cambridge. pp. 40–59. Google Scholar

21.

M Shimizu, H Kudo, H Ueda, A Hara, K Shimazaki, and K Yamauchi . 1993. Identification and immunological properties of an olfactory system-specific protein in kokanee salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). Zool Sci 10:287–294. Google Scholar

22.

SL Starcevic and BS Zielinski . 1995. Immunohistochemical localization of glutathione S-transferase pt in rainbow trout olfactory receptor neurons. Neurosci Lett 183:175–178. Google Scholar

23.

H Ueda, H Kudo, M Shimizu, K Mochida, S Adachi, and K Yamauchi . 1993. Immunological similarity between an olfactory system-specific protein and a testicular germ cell protein in kokanee salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). Zool Sci 10:685–690. Google Scholar

24.

MM Wang and RR Reed . 1993. Molecular cloning of the olfactory neuronal transcription factor Olf-1 by genetic selection in yeast. Nature 364:121–126. Google Scholar

25.

CJ Wysocki and M Meredith . 1987. The vomeronasal system. In “Neurobiology of Taste and Smell. ” Ed by Finger TE and Silver WL . Wiley-Interscience. New York. pp. 125–150. Google Scholar

26.

E Zeiske, B Theisen, and H Breucker . 1992. Structure, development, and evolutionary aspects of the peripheral olfactory system. In “Fish Chemoreception. ” Ed by TJ Hara Great Britain at Univ Press. Cambridge. pp. 13–39. Google Scholar

27.

B Zielinski and TJ Hara . 1988. Morphological and physiological development of olfactory receptor cells in rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) embryos. J Comp Neurol 27:300–311. Google Scholar

28.

B Zielinski and TJ Hara . 1992. Ciliated and microvillar receptor cells degenerate and then differentiate in the olfactory epithelium of rainbow trout following olfactory nerve section. Microscopy Research and Technique 23:22–27. Google Scholar
Hideaki Kudo, Hiroshi Ueda, and Kohei Yamauchi "Immunocytochemical Investigation of a Salmonid Olfactory System-Specific Protein in the Kokanee Salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka)," Zoological Science 13(5), 647-653, (1 October 1996). https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.13.647
Received: 27 October 1995; Accepted: 1 February 1996; Published: 1 October 1996
Back to Top