Translator Disclaimer
6 December 2018 Spiders and pseudoscorpions (Arachnida: Araneae, Pseudoscorpiones) in old oaks of a Central European floodplain
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Spiders and pseudoscorpions on old pedunculate oaks (Quercus robur) with tree cavities were studied in a Central European floodplain (South Moravia, Czech Republic). Altogether 322 specimens from 47 spider taxa and 71 specimens of six pseudoscorpion species were collected during 2010 and 2011 from tree cavities using two methods. More specimens and species of spiders were obtained from flight interception traps and more specimens and species of pseudoscorpions were obtained from pitfall traps. Remarkable records represent typical cavity dwellers, i.e. the spider Midia midas (Simon, 1884), the pseudoscorpions Larca lata (Hansen, 1884) and Apocheiridium ferum (Simon, 1879), the latter occurs mostly under tree bark. Five arachnid species are listed in the Czech red list: Midia midas, Leptorchestes berolinensis (C. L. Koch, 1846), Dipoena erythropus (Simon, 1881), Larca lata and Dendrochernes cyrneus (L. Koch, 1873).

Old trees provide important microhabitats for arachnids, such as foliage, branches, trunk and hollows; bark cracks and cavities offer specific microclimatic and structural conditions (e.g. Wunderlich 1982, Nikolai 1986). Some arachnid species live on trees throughout the year, whereas others use trees only for certain periods, mainly for overwintering (e.g. Horváth & Szinetár 2002, Horváth et al. 2004). Some facultative bark-dwelling arachnids that usually live in the canopy are found on trunks and in cavities only from late autumn to early spring, i.e. while deciduous trees are without their leaves (Szinetár & Horváth 2006).

In Europe, spiders living in tree hollows have been studied sporadically (Martínez De Murguía et al. 2007, Niţu et al. 2009), but no detailed study focusing on this topic has been published yet. From Czechia, only a single study dealing specifically with spiders (and some other invertebrate groups) in tree hollows has been published so far (Růžička et al. 1991).

In contrast, pseudoscorpion occurrence in tree hollows is generally known (Beier 1963, Weygoldt 1969, Ranius 2002, Christophoryová et al. 2017b). In Europe, obligate hollowdwelling pseudoscorpions belong mainly to the families Cheliferidae and Chernetidae (Beier 1963). The first contribution about pseudoscorpions from tree hollows in Czechia was published by Ducháč (1993a); pseudoscorpions were collected using pitfall traps installed in hollow trees in the Třeboňsko Protected Landscape Area. Šťáhlavský (2001) carried out systematic research in Prague and its surroundings, where pseudoscorpions were obtained from the mould of 101 tree hollows of 16 tree species. Šťáhlavský (2001) categorized the species found according to their relationship to tree hollows and defined Mundochthonius styriacus Beier, 1971, Dinocheirus panzeri (C.L. Koch, 1837), Allochernes wideri (C.L. Koch, 1843), and Anthrenochernes stellae Lohmander, 1939 as species with a close relationship to this microhabitat. Later several additional records of pseudoscorpions from tree hollows across the country were mentioned in further faunistic publications (Šťáhlavský 2006a, 2006b, 2011, Šťáhlavský & Krásný 2007, Šťáhlavský & Tuf 2009, Šťáhlavský & Chytil 2013).

Various methods have been used to collect arboricolous arachnids. The most popular and effective are arboreal eclectors situated on trunks (e.g. Albrecht 1995, Blick 2011) or on branches (e.g. Koponen 2004). Pocket traps attached to the tree bark represent another effective method (e.g. Bogya et al. 1999, Horváth & Szinetár 2002, Isaia et al. 2006). Pitfall traps have been used to sample arachnids in tree hollows (e.g. Růžička et al. 1991, Ranius & Jansson 2002) and on tree trunks (e.g. Pinzon & Spence 2008, Machač & Tuf 2016). Canopy-dwelling arachnids have been also sampled by canopy fogging (e.g. Otto & Floren 2007). Sweeping and hand collecting were used as a simple method for collecting specimens from branches (Hansen 1992). Flight interception traps have been developed mainly to collect flying insects, those of the window trap type being employed in particular for catching beetles in flight (e.g. Økland 1996). Flight interception traps have not been used primarily for sampling arachnids until now.

The aim of the present paper was to collect original data about spiders and pseudoscorpions of old oaks growing in a Central European floodplain on the northern margin of the Pannonian basin, obtained by pitfall traps installed in tree cavities and by flight interception traps installed near their openings. The material was collected within a study primarily focused on saproxylic beetles associated with tree hollows.

Material and methods

Study area

The study was carried out in the Lower Dyje (Thaya) floodplain (48°43′10″N, 16°54′27″E, 150 to 165 m a.s.l.) south to southeast of the Pohansko hunting chateau and archaeological site, which is located ca. 3 km south of the town of Břeclav (South Moravia, CZECH REPUBLIC). This area had been historically used as a wood pasture; during the last two hundred years, the more open areas were partially changed to hay meadows and the rest mostly to high forest for timber production. There is a high number of old trees, particularly pedunculate oaks (Quercus robur), both in the meadows and within smaller woods and larger forest stands, that had grown for a long time in open or semi-open conditions (Fig. 1). The study area, sampling design and sampling methods are described in detail in Schlaghamerský (2011) and Miklín et al. (2017).

Sampling design

Sampling was conducted in 2010 and 2011 (leg. J. Budka, J. Schlaghamerský). In 2010, 22 old oaks (Quercus robur) with cavities were studied. Ten (five live and five dead) were solitary trees in meadows. Twelve trees (seven live and five dead) were in close-canopy forest stands. All of the dead trees were standing. In 2011, a selection of 11 of these trees was resampled (traps remained on the same positions); only two of them were solitary trees in meadows (one dead), the rest growing in close-canopy forest (six live, three dead). Two sampling methods were used (their primary purpose was the sampling of saproxylic beetles associated with tree hollows). On each tree a flight interception trap (FIT) and a pitfall trap (PT) were installed. FITs hung near the opening of a selected cavity on a tree trunk. Cavity openings had to be at a height between 1.5 and 7 m above ground (Fig. 2a). Cavities with contact to the ground or entirely hollow trees were excluded. The FIT position was thus determined by the position of the opening of the cavity (into which a pitfall trap was also installed) and its distance from the tree crown varied substantially – in some cases it hung within the lowest part of the crown, often substantially below it (due to the primary objective of their installation). FITs were of the vane type, made of two crossing sheets (50 cm × 25 cm) of transparent plastic, with a roof above and a funnel (24 cm in diameter) connected to a collecting bottle attached below. As killing and preserving agent, an aqueous 50% ethylene glycol solution with a drop of detergent was used. Inside each tree cavity a pitfall trap was buried into the wood mould with its opening (6 cm in diameter) level with the mould surface (Fig. 2b). FITs and pitfall traps were exposed simultaneously from the 21th April 2010 to 4th October 2010 and from the 5 May 2011 to 23 August 2011 with three week sampling intervals. Spiders were identified using the key of Nentwig et al. (2018). Pseudoscorpions were identified using the key by Christophoryová et al. (2011c). Nomenclature for all taxa follows the World Spider Catalog (2018) and the catalogue Pseudoscorpions of the World (Harvey 2013). The material of spiders and pseudoscorpions is deposited in the collection of the Department of Botany and Zoology at the Masaryk University in Brno.

Fig. 1:

Closed-canopy forest with interspersed old oaks at the Pohansko study site (photo J. Schlaghamerský)

f01_24.jpg

Results

Spiders (Araneae)

A total of 322 specimens representing 47 taxa from 15 families were identified (Tab. 1). FITs yielded 165 specimens belonging to 40 taxa and 14 families. None of the species captured by the FITs were particularly abundant, only some species were present in relatively high numbers: Parasteatoda lunata (Clerck, 1757) (9 specimens), Anyphaena accentuata (Walckenaer, 1802) (8), Porrhomma oblitum (O. P.-Cambridge, 1871) (8), Leptorchestes berolinensis (C. L. Koch, 1846) (8) and Platnickina tincta (Walckenaer, 1802) (8) (Tab. 1). FITs exclusively yielded 27 spider taxa. Most species captured by FITs were Linyphiidae with nine species and a group of species identified only to family level (Tab. 1). Pitfall traps placed in tree hollows yielded 157 specimens belonging to 20 taxa and 11 families (Fig. 4a). The most abundant species trapped in the tree hollows were Tegenaria ferruginea (Panzer, 1804) and Midia midas (Simon, 1884). The most species-rich family in the pitfall traps was Linyphiidae with six species and a group of species identified only to family level. Most spiders collected in hollows are horizontal web builders. Seven spider taxa were obtained exclusively by pitfall traps. A total of 226 specimens belonging to 41 taxa were obtained from trees in forests and 96 specimens from 27 taxa from solitary trees in meadows. Twenty taxa were obtained exclusively from oak hollows situated in forests, six taxa were obtained exclusively from solitary trees in meadows. Traps installed on dead and live trees yielded 139 specimens belonging to 34 taxa and 183 specimens from 40 taxa, respectively. Seven species were obtained exclusively from dead trees. Exclusively in live trees, 13 taxa were present (Tab. 1).

Fig. 2:

Sampling methods used during the current study. a. Flight interception trap (FIT) (photo J. Schlaghamerský); b. Pitfall trap (PT) inside a tree hollow (photo J. Budka)

f02_24.jpg

Fig. 3:

Typical hollow dwellers. a. Midia midas, body length 3.5 mm (photo R. Macek); b. Larca lata, scale bar 2 mm (photo J. Christophoryová)

f03_24.jpg

Remarkable spider species

Linyphiidae

Midia midas (Simon, 1884) (Fig. 3a)

This species is rare and associated with ancient deciduous trees. It lives in tree hollows, where it builds small horizontal webs (Russell-Smith 2002). It is known to occur from the Iberian Peninsula to Turkey, reaching Denmark, Great Britain and Poland in the north (Nentwig et al. 2018). Within Czechia it has been found in eastern Bohemia around Pardubice (Dolanský 1998), South Bohemia (Růžička et al. 1991) and South Moravia near Lednice (Buchar & Růžička 2002, Kubcová & Schlaghamerský 2002). The species is listed in the Czech red list as endangered (Řezáč et al. 2015). Its perceived rarity might be partially due to the lack of arachnological studies focusing on its habitat, although this habitat – old trees with cavities – has definitely become scarce and threatened.

Salticidae

Leptorchestes berolinensis (C. L. Koch, 1846)

Leptorchestes berolinensis is considered as a rare species, living on vegetation on sun-exposed forest edges, on rock outcrops (Buchar & Růžička 2002), as well as on sun-exposed bark of solitary trees and on wooden fences (Bryja et al. 2005, Machač & Niedobová 2015). It is known to occur widely in Europe, except North Europe and Great Britain (Nentwig et al. 2018). The species is listed in the Czech red list as vulnerable (Řezáč et al. 2015).

Theridiidae

Dipoena erythropus (Simon, 1881)

This species is very rare, living on trees and known within Czechia only from South Moravia (Buchar & Růžička 2002), but it might have been overlooked. It lives on branches in the crowns of deciduous trees, mainly oaks. It is known to occur widely in Europe, except the northern part of Europe (Nentwig et al. 2018). Four specimens were obtained from FITs in the present study. This species is listed in the Czech red list as critically endangered (Řezáč et al. 2015).

Pseudoscorpions (Pseudoscorpiones)

In total, 71 specimens belonging to six species from four families were identified (Tab. 1). More specimens were collected in pitfall traps than in FITs (Fig. 4b). The most abundant species species, Larca lata, was found exclusively in pitfall traps. Also, all specimens of Allochernes wideri were found in pitfall traps. On the other hand, Apocheiridium ferum (Simon, 1879) and Dendrochernes cyrneus (L. Koch, 1873) were collected only in FITs. Chelifer cancroides (Linnaeus, 1758) and Chernes hahnii (C. L. Koch, 1839) were captured in both trap types. Markedly more specimens were present in hollows in trees situated in forest stands than in those growing in meadows (Tab. 1). Remarkably, all pseudoscorpions were collected on live trees, not a single specimen on a dead one (Tab. 1).

Fig. 4:

Abundance and species numbers of spiders (a) and pseudoscorpions (b) in different types of traps. Abbreviations: FIT – flight interception trap, PT – pitfall trap

f04_24.jpg

Remarkable pseudoscorpion species

Larcidae

Larca lata (Hansen, 1884) (Fig. 3b)

This species appears to be rare and vulnerable and is a typical cavity dweller (Judson & Legg 1996, Ranius & Wilander 2000). It occurs only in Europe, where it has been found in 13 countries until now (Harvey 2013). Recently it was reported for the first time from Slovakia and Hungary (Christophoryová et al. 2011a, Novák 2013). Within Czechia it has been found in the Třeboňsko Protected Landscape Area (South Bohemia) and in the Lower Morava Biosphere Reserve, which covers also the present study site (Ducháč 1993a, Šťáhlavský 2011, Šťáhlavský & Chytil 2013). In the Czech red list, it is listed as vulnerable (Šťáhlavský 2017).

Cheiridiidae

Apocheiridium ferum (Simon, 1879)

This species is distributed in Europe and has also been found in Asian Turkey, Azerbaijan and Uzbekistan (Harvey 2013). Beier (1963) reported that the species lives under tree bark, especially of fruit trees. According to Weygoldt (1966) it occurs even in the tightest spaces under bark. Ducháč (1997) reported A. ferum from South Moravia as new for Czechia, without providing information about its habitat. Later it was found in the same region in the village of Lednice (Šťáhlavský & Ducháč 2001) and also close-by at Valtice and Hlohovec, in both cases under Platanus bark (Šťáhlavský & Chytil 2013).

Chernetidae

Dendrochernes cyrneus (L. Koch, 1873)

This species is distributed in Asia and Europe (Harvey 2013). It is one of the pseudoscorpions that regularly occurs in bird nests, but it has also been found under tree bark and in tree hollows, though rarely (Christophoryová et al. 2011b, Krajčovičová & Christophoryová 2014). The Lower Morava Biosphere Reserve, which covers also our present study site, represents the only area within Czechia, from where D. cyrneus has been recorded; it was found in oak litter, under tree bark and phoretic on a longhorn beetle (Ducháč 1993b; Šťáhlavský & Chytil 2013). Šťáhlavský (2017) listed the species as vulnerable in the Czech red list.

Tab. 1:

List of taxa collected on old oaks at Pohansko; Abbreviations: FIT– flight interception traps close to cavity openings, PT – pitfall traps in hollows, for – trees in close-canopy forest, sol – solitary trees in meadows, dead – dead trees, live – live trees

t01_24.gif

Discussion

Most of the obtained 40 spider species represent arboreal ones (Szinetár & Horváth 2005). Only six taxa were epigeic: Cicurina cicur (Fabricius, 1793), Drassodes sp., Harpactea rubicunda (C. L. Koch, 1838), Diplocephalus picinus (Blackwall, 1841), Pardosa sp. and Trochosa robusta (Simon, 1876). The most abundant species in the FITs were Anyphaena accentuata, Leptorchestes berolinensis and Parasteatoda lunata. Anyphaena accentuata lives during the vegetation season on tree branches, L. berolinensis and P. lunata dwell on tree trunks (Buchar & Růžička 2002). Several small linyphiid spiders were obtained from FITs, including juvenile specimens, which disperse by ballooning. The majority of the species captured by FITs live on tree trunks or branches.

Tegenaria ferruginea and Midia midas were most abundant in the pitfall traps. Both species are typical cavity dwellers (Růžička et al. 1991, Buchar & Růžička 2002). The money spider M. midas is rare and endangered in the whole of Europe (Russell-Smith 2002, Řezáč et al. 2015). Another typical hollow dweller is Scotophaeus quadripunctatus (Linnaeus, 1758), which we obtained only from pitfall traps. The record from Pohansko represents a new locality for Czechia, but not far from its nearest known locality close to Lednice (Kubcová & Schlaghamerský 2002). All specimens were obtained from pitfall traps. The number of spider species and family composition obtained by pitfall trapping was similar to other studies from tree hollows in Spain and Romania (Martínez De Murguía et al. 2007, Niţu et al. 2009), but the species composition differed. Other remarkable spider species were the jumping spider L. berolinensis and the theridiid Dipoena erythropus, listed in the Czech red list as vulnerable and critically endangered, respectively (Řezáč et al. 2015). Significantly more spiders were obtained from trees in the forest than from solitary trees in meadows. Forests have a high species pool of arboricolous spider species (Samu et al. 2014). More species and specimens were present on live trees than on dead ones.

All of the collected pseudoscorpion species, except Chelifer cancroides, represent typical inhabitants of tree microhabitats. C. cancroides is considered to be cosmopolitan and synanthropic (Beier 1963), which may be related to its frequent occurrence in the nests of Hirundinidae (Turienzo et al. 2010). Nevertheless, its occurrence under tree bark and in tree cavities is also known (Mahnert 2011, Krajčovičová & Christophoryová 2014). Šťáhlavský & Chytil (2013) recorded the species in tree hollows within Czechia, in the south Moravian floodplains at Lednice and Břeclav. During the present study, C. cancroides was found in both trap types. The same numbers of individuals were found in hollows of solitary trees as well as of trees situated in forest stands. Two specimens of Chernes hahnii were obtained in the present study, one in FIT one in a pitfall trap. The species shows a strong association with the microhabitat under tree bark (Šťáhlavský 2001, Drogla & Lippold 2004, Krajčovičová & Christophoryová 2014). Its presence in FIT could have been caused by its upwards migration on the tree trunks or by zoophoresy. Krajčovičová & Christophoryová (2014) collected 11 specimens of Chernes hahnii in photoeclectors installed on tree trunks which can also be related with upwards migration on the tree trunks. A surprisingly low number of Allochernes wideri was found in tree hollows in the present study. In a study conducted in Prague and its surroundings, A. wideri represented the second most abundant species found in tree hollows (Šťáhlavský 2001). The species was reported in all of the subsequent faunistic papers dealing with pseudoscorpions from tree microhabitats in Czechia (Šťáhlavský 2006a, 2006b, 2011, Šťáhlavský & Krásný 2007, Šťáhlavský & Tuf 2009, Šťáhlavský & Chytil 2013). Three species Larca lata, Apocheiridium ferum and Dendrochernes cyrneus are presented as remarkable records in the current paper. Two of them, L. lata and D. cyrneus, are listed in the Czech red list as vulnerable (Šťáhlavský 2017).

In conclusion, looking at the obtained data, one has to bear in mind that whereas the pitfall traps collected specimens living in tree hollows or actively visiting them, the trapping of spiders and pseudoscorpions in free-hanging FITs was a rather accidental process. Both groups do not fly, though some passive air-born transport does occur (ballooning and zoophoresy) (Decae 1987, Christophoryová et al. 2017a). However, other non-flying invertebrates have also been obtained from FITs (own unpublished observation). In the present case one has to assume that many individuals falling down from the canopy, possibly taken by wind, ended up in the traps despite the trap roofs (meant to prevent flooding by rainwater and accumulation of debris in the trap funnel). We also observed spiders building their webs between the panes or between pane and roof.

Acknowledgements

Jana Christophoryová and Katarína Krajčovičová, working on the pseudoscorpion part of the paper, were financially supported by VEGA 1/0191/15. The Forests of the Czech Republic, state enterprise, kindly allowed us to access our study area using their roads in the Soutok Game Preserve. Stanislav Němejc, David Hauck and Jiří Procházka helped with field work. We would like to thank František Šťáhlavský and one anonymous reviewer for their valuable comments and corrections that improved the paper.

References

1.

Albrecht H 1995 Stammeklektorenfänge von Spinnen (Araneae) in Laubwaldgesellschaften des ehemaligen Militärgeländes „Hohe Schreck-Finne” (Nordthüringen). – Veröffentlichungen des Naturkundemuseums Erfurt 14: 67–79 Google Scholar

2.

Beier M 1963 Ordnung Pseudoscorpionidea (Afterskorpione). Bestimmungsbücher zur Bodenfauna Europas, Lieferung 1. Akademie-Verlag, Berlin. 313 pp. Google Scholar

3.

Blick T 2011 Abundant and rare spiders on tree trunks in German forests (Arachnida: Araneae). – Arachnologische Mitteilungen 40: 5–14 –  https://doi.org/10.5431/aramit4002 Google Scholar

4.

Bogya S, Szinetár C & Markó V 1999 Species composition of spider (Araneae) assemblages in apple and pear orchards in Central Basin. – Acta Phytopatologica et Entomologica Hungarica 34: 99–121 Google Scholar

5.

Bryja V, Svatoň J, Chytil J, Majkus Z, Růžička V, Kasal P, Dolanský J, Buchar J, Chvátalová I, Řezáč M, Kubcová L, Erhart J & Fenclová I 2005 Spiders (Araneae) of the Lower Morava Biosphere Reserve and closely adjacent localities (Czech Republic). – Acta Musei Moraviae, Scientiae biologicae 90: 13–184 Google Scholar

6.

Buchar J & Růžička V 2002 Catalogue of spiders of Czech Republic. Peres, Praha. 351 pp. Google Scholar

7.

Christophoryová J, Fenďa P & Krištofík J 2011a Chthonius hungaricus and Larca lata new to the fauna of Slovakia (Pseudoscorpiones: Chthoniidae, Larcidae). – Arachnologische Mitteilungen 41: 1–6 –  https://doi.org/0.5431/aramit4101 Google Scholar

8.

Christophoryová J, Gruľa D & Krajčovičová K 2017a New records of pseudoscorpions (Arachnida: Pseudoscorpiones) associated with animals and human habitats in Slovakia and the Czech Republic. – Arachnologische Mitteilungen 53: 67–76 –  https://doi.org/10.5431/aramit5311 Google Scholar

9.

Christophoryová J, Jajcayová D & Krajčovičová K 2017b Pseudoscorpions (Arachnida: Pseudoscorpiones) living in tree microhabitats in Slovakia. – Klapalekiana 53: 283–297 Google Scholar

10.

Christophoryová J, Krumpálová Z, Krištofík J & Országhová Z 2011b Association of pseudoscorpions with different types of bird nests. – Biologia 66: 669–677 –  https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-011-0072-8 Google Scholar

11.

Christophoryová J, Šťáhlavský F & Fedor P 2011c An updated identification key to the pseudoscorpions (Arachnida: Pseudoscorpiones) of the Czech Republic and Slovakia. – Zootaxa 2876: 35–48 Google Scholar

12.

Decae AE 1987 Dispersal: ballooning and other mechanisms. In: Nentwig W (ed.) Ecophysiology of spiders. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo. pp. 348–356 Google Scholar

13.

Dolanský J 1998 Tři vzácné druhy pavouků na pardubickém zámku. – Východočeský sborník přírodovědný. Práce a studie 6: 155–156 Google Scholar

14.

Drogla R & Lippold K 2004 Zur Kenntnis der Pseudoskorpion-Fauna von Ostdeutschland (Arachnida, Pseudoscorpiones). – Arachnologische Mitteilungen 27–28: 1–54 –  https://doi.org/10.5431/aramit2701 Google Scholar

15.

Ducháč V 1993a Štírci (Pseudoscorpionidea) ze stromových dutin na Třeboňsku. – Sborník Jihočeského muzea v Českých Budějovicích, Přírodní vědy 33: 65–69 Google Scholar

16.

Ducháč V 1993b Zwei neue Afterskorpion-Arten aus der Tschechischen Republik. – Arachnologische Mitteilungen 3: 36–38 –  https://doi.org/10.5431/aramit0505 Google Scholar

17.

Ducháč V 1997 Noví příslušníci fauny štírků (Pseudoscorpiones) České republiky. In: Výjezdní seminář Arachnologické sekce České společnosti entomologické, 21–23 February 1997, Křivoklát. pp. 1–4 Google Scholar

18.

Hansen H 1992 Über die Arachniden-Fauna von urbanen Lebensräumen in Venedig - II. Die Rinde-bewohnenden Arten des Stammbereiches von Platanus hybrida. – Bollettino del Museo civico di Storia naturale di Venezia 41: 91–108 Google Scholar

19.

Harvey MS 2013 Pseudoscorpions of the world, version 3.0. Western Australian Museum, Perth. – Internet:  http://museum.wa.gov.au/catalogues-beta/pseudoscorpions/ (September 4, 2018) Google Scholar

20.

Horváth R, Lengyel S, Szinetár C & Honti S 2004 The effect of exposition time and temperature on spiders (Araneae) overwintering on the bark of black pine (Pinus nigra). In: Samu F & Szinetár C (eds) European Arachnology 2002. Plant Protection Institute and Berzsenyi College, Budapest. pp. 95–102 Google Scholar

21.

Horváth R & Szinetár C 2002 Ecofaunistical study of bark-dwelling spiders (Araneae) on black pine (Pinus nigra) in urban and forest habitats. – Acta Biologica Debrecina 24: 87–101 Google Scholar

22.

Isaia M, Bona F & Badino G 2006 Comparison of polyethylene bubble wrap and corrugated cardboard traps for sampling treeinhabiting spiders. – Environmental Entomology 35: 1654–1660 –  https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/35.6.1654 Google Scholar

23.

Judson MLI & Legg G 1996 Discovery of the pseudoscorpion Larca lata (Garypoidea, Larcidae) in Britain. – Bulletin of the British Arachnological Society 10: 205–210 Google Scholar

24.

Koponen S 2004 Arthropods from high oak branches – Comparison of two trap types, with a special reference to spiders. – Latvijas Entomologs 41: 71–75 Google Scholar

25.

Krajčovičová K & Christophoryová J 2014 Faunistic survey of pseudoscorpions (Arachnida: Pseudoscorpiones) collected from trees and using Malaise traps in Slovakia and the Czech Republic. – Klapalekiana 50: 167–180 Google Scholar

26.

Kubcová L & Schlaghamerský J 2002 Zur Spinnenfauna der Stammregion stehenden Totholzes in südmährischen Auwäldern. – Arachnologische Mitteilungen 24: 35–61 –  https://doi.org/10.5431/aramit2403 Google Scholar

27.

Machač O & Niedobová J 2015 Spiders (Araneae) of Hůrka u Hranic National Nature Reserve (Moravia, Czech Republic). – Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis 63: 65–75 –  https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201563010065 Google Scholar

28.

Machač O & Tuf HI 2016 Spiders and harvestmen on tree trunks obtained by three sampling methods. – Arachnologische Mitteilungen 51: 66–71 –  https://doi.org/10.5431/aramit5110 Google Scholar

29.

Mahnert V 2011 Pseudoscorpiones (Arachnida). In: Christian E, Komposch C, Mahnert V & Vogtenhuber P (eds) Checklist der Fauna Österreichs, No. 5. Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien. pp. 28–39 Google Scholar

30.

Martínez De Murguía L, De Castro A, Molino-Olmedo F 2007 Artropodós Saproxílicos Forestales en los Parques Naturales de Aralar y Aizkorri (Guipúzcoa, España). – Boletín de la Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa 41: 237–250 Google Scholar

31.

Miklín J, Hauck D, Konvička O & Cizek L 2017 Veteran trees and saproxylic insects in the floodplains of the Dyje and Morava rivers, Czech Republic. – Journal of Maps 13: 291–299 –  https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2017.1300785 Google Scholar

32.

Nentwig W, Blick T, Gloor D, Hänggi A & Kropf C 2018 Spiders of Europe, version 07.2018 – Internet:  http://www.araneae.nmbe.ch (July 4, 2018) Google Scholar

33.

Nikolai V 1986 The bark of trees: thermal properties, microclimate and fauna. – Oecologia 69: 148–160 –  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00399052 Google Scholar

34.

Niţu E, Olenici N, Popa I, Nae A & Biriş IA 2009 Soil and saproxylic species (Coleoptera, Collembola, Araneae) in primeval forests from the northern part of South-Eastern Carpathians. – Annals of Forest Research 52: 27–54 –  https://doi.org/10.15287/afr.2009.121 Google Scholar

35.

Novák J 2013 First records of Larca lata (Hansen, 1884) and Neobisium biharicum Beier, 1939 in Hungary. – Opuscula Zoologica, Budapest 44: 161–166 Google Scholar

36.

Økland B 1996 A comparison of three methods of trapping saproxylic beetles. – European Journal of Entomology 93: 195–209 –  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020343030085 Google Scholar

37.

Otto S & Floren A 2007 The spider fauna (Araneae) of tree canopies in the Bialowieza Forest. – Fragmenta Faunistica 50: 57–70 –  https://doi.org/0.3161/00159301FF2007.50.1.057 Google Scholar

38.

Pinzon J & Spence JR 2008 Performance of two arboreal pitfall trap designs in sampling cursorial spiders from tree trunks. – Journal of Arachnology 32: 280–286 –  https://doi.org/10.1636/CH07-97.1 Google Scholar

39.

Ranius T 2002 Population ecology and conservation of beetles and pseudoscorpions living in hollow oaks in Sweden. – Animal Biodiversity and Conservation 25: 53–68 –  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00124-0 Google Scholar

40.

Ranius T & Jansson N 2002 A comparison of three methods to survey saproxylic beetles in hollow oaks. – Biodiversity and Conservation 11: 1759–1771 –  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020343030085 Google Scholar

41.

Ranius T & Wilander P 2000 Occurrence of Larca lata H. J. Hansen (Pseudoscorpionida: Garypidae) and Allochernes wideri C. L. Koch (Pseudoscorpionida: Chernetidae) in tree hollows in relation to habitat quality and density. – Journal of Insect Conservation 4: 23–31 –  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009682722905 Google Scholar

42.

Russell-Smith A 2002 Midia midas (Simon, 1884) in Epping Forest, Essex. – Newsletter of the British Arachnological Society 95: 13–14 Google Scholar

43.

Růžička V, Boháč J & Macek J 1991 Bezobratlí živočichové dutých stromů na Třeboňsku. – Sborník Jihočeského Muzea v Českých Budějovicích, Přírodní Vědy 31: 33–46 Google Scholar

44.

Řezáč M, Kůrka A, Růžička V & Heneberg P 2015 Redlist of Czech spiders: 3rd adjusted according to evidence-based national conservation priorities. – Biologia 70: 1–22 –  https://doi.org/10.1515/biolog-2015-0079 Google Scholar

45.

Samu F, Lengyel G, Szita E, Bidló A & Ódor P 2014 The effect of forest stand characteristics on spider diversity and species composition in deciduous-coniferous mixed forests. – Journal of Arachnology 42: 135–141 –  https://doi.org/10.1636/CP13-75.1 Google Scholar

46.

Schlaghamerský J 2011 Die Totholzfauna der südmährischen March-Thaya-Auen. – Wissenschaftliche Mitteilungen Niederösterreichisches Landesmuseum 22: 219–240 Google Scholar

47.

Szinetár C & Horváth R 2006 A review of spiders on tree trunks in Europe (Araneae). – Acta zoologica bulgarica, Suppl. 1 (European Arachnology 2005): 221–257 Google Scholar

48.

Šťáhlavský F 2001 Štírci (Arachnida: Pseudoscorpiones) Prahy. – Klapalekiana 37: 73–121 Google Scholar

49.

Šťáhlavský F 2006a Štírci (Pseudoscorpiones) CHKO Kokořínsko. – Bohemia Centralis 27: 161–165 Google Scholar

50.

Šťáhlavský F 2006b Štírci (Arachnida: Pseudoscorpiones) Národního parku Podyjí. – Klapalekiana 42: 167–178 Google Scholar

51.

Šťáhlavský F 2011 Štírci (Arachnida: Pseudoscorpiones) CHKO Třeboňsko a okolí. – Klapalekiana 47: 247–258 Google Scholar

52.

Šťáhlavský F 2017 Pseudoscorpiones (štírci). In: Hejda R, Farkač J & Chobot K (eds) Červený seznam ohrožených druhů České republiky. Bezobratlí. Red list of threatened species in the Czech Republic. Invertebrates. Agentura ochrany přírody a krajiny ČR, Praha. pp. 78–79 Google Scholar

53.

Šťáhlavský F & Chytil J 2013 Štírci (Arachnida: Pseudoscorpiones) Biosférické rezervace Dolní Morava a okolí (Česká republika). – Klapalekiana 49: 73–88 Google Scholar

54.

Šťáhlavský F & Ducháč V 2001 Neue und wenig bekannte Afterskorpion-Arten aus der Tschechischen Republik. – Arachnologische Mitteilungen 21: 46–49 –  https://doi.org/10.5431/aramit2105 Google Scholar

55.

Šťáhlavský F & Krásný L 2007 Štírci (Arachnida: Pseudoscorpiones) Dolního Povltaví a Podřípska. – Bohemia Centralis 28: 427–436 Google Scholar

56.

Šťáhlavský F & Tuf IH 2009 Štírci (Arachnida: Pseudoscorpiones) CHKO Litovelské Pomoraví. – Acta rerum naturalium 7: 97–102 Google Scholar

57.

Turienzo P, Di Iorio O & Mahnert V 2010 Global checklist of pseudoscorpions (Arachnida) found in birds` nests. – Revue Suisse de Zoologie 117: 557–598 Google Scholar

58.

Weygoldt P 1966 Moos- und Bücherskorpione. A. Ziemsen, Wittenberg Lutherstadt. 84 pp. Google Scholar

59.

Weygoldt P 1969 The biology of pseudoscorpions. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 145 pp. Google Scholar

60.

World Spider Catalog 2018 World spider Catalog. Version 19.0. Natural History Museum, Bern. –  http://wsc.nmbe.ch/ https://doi.org/10.24436/2 Google Scholar

61.

Wunderlich J 1982 Mitteleuropäische Spinnen (Araneae) der Baumrinde. – Zeitschrift für angewandte Entomologie 94: 9–21 Google Scholar

Appendices

Electronic Appendix (pdf format): Supplementary file with detailed collection data of each specimen.

Ondřej Machač, Jana Christophoryová, Katarína Krajčovičová, Jan Budka, and Jiří Schlaghamerský "Spiders and pseudoscorpions (Arachnida: Araneae, Pseudoscorpiones) in old oaks of a Central European floodplain," Arachnologische Mitteilungen: Arachnology Letters 56(1), 24-31, (6 December 2018). https://doi.org/10.30963/aramit5604
Received: 23 March 2018; Accepted: 13 November 2018; Published: 6 December 2018
JOURNAL ARTICLE
8 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top