Translator Disclaimer
24 September 2010 Glis glis (Rodentia: Gliridae)
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Glis glis (Linnaeus, 1766) is a glirid commonly called the fat or edible dormouse. It is the largest dormouse and the only species in the genus Glis. Range mainly overlaps with a deciduous and mixed forest zone in Europe and southwestern Asia. Principal habitat is deciduous and mixed woodland and the species is strictly nocturnal. G. glis is unusual among small rodents in its long life expectancy (mean is about 9 years), prolonged hibernation (up to 7 months), and periodic reproductive failure. It is a species of conservation concern along the northern part of its range, and a game animal in Slovenia and Croatia.

Synonymies completed 1 June 2008

Glis Brisson, 1762

Glis Brisson, 1762:113. Type species Sciurus glis Linnaeus, 1766:87, by designation under the plenary powers of the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (1998) in Opinion 1894.

Myoxus Zimmermann, 1780:351. Type species Sciurus glis Linnaeus, 1766, by original designation.

Myorus Reichenbach, 1835:7. Incorrect subsequent spelling of Myoxus Zimmerman, 1780.

Elius Schulze, 1900:200. No type species selected; name initially used as a subgenus of Myoxus, containing 2 species glis (Sciurus glis) and dryas (Myoxus dryas, now in Dryomys).

Context and Content. Order Rodentia, suborder Sciuromorpha, family Gliridae, subfamily Glirinae. Glis is monotypic (Holden 2005).

Glis glis (Linnaeus, 1766)

Fat Dormouse

Sciurus glis Linnaeus, 1766:87. Type locality “Habitat in Europa australi,” restricted to Southern Carniola ( =  southern Slovenia), by Violani and Zava (1995:111).

Sciurus persicus Erxleben, 1777:417. Type locality “Habitat in Persiae prouincia Gilan,” restricted to Rasht, Province of Ghilan, Iran, by Lay (1967:193).

Glis esculentus Blumenbach, 1779:79. Type locality “südlichen Europa,” restricted to Central Europe, by Miller (1912:577).

Glis vulgaris Oken, 1816:868. Type locality “Europa, Mittelasien, an Wolga, mehr südlich, in Deutschland, nicht selten, besonders ums Fichtelgebierg, in Krain,” restricted to Germany, by Miller (1912:577). Oken (1816) has been rejected for nomenclatural purposes (International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature 1956). Nomen nudum.

Myoxus giglis Cuvier, 1832:444. Nomen nudum (Miller 1912).

Myoxus avellanus Owen, 1840:25, pl. 105, fig. 6. Nomen nudum (Miller 1912).

Glis italicus Barrett-Hamilton, 1898:424. Type locality “Siena,” Italy.

Glis insularis Barrett-Hamilton, 1899:228. Type locality “Monte Aspro, near Palermo,” Sicily, Italy.

Myoxus glis orientalis Nehring, 1903:533. Type locality “Gebirge Alem-Dagh, nordöstlich von Scutari, Kleinasien” ( =  Üsküdar, Alem Dağı, İstanbul—Kryštufek and Vohralík 2005).

Myoxus glis caspius Satunin, 1905:55. Type locality unknown; stated as “Chuli Canyon, some 40 km from Ashkhabad (Turkmenistan)” by Ognev (1947:467).

Myoxus glis caspicus Satunin, 1905–1906:54. Type locality “Kupferbergwerk Katar, Kreis Zangezur, Gonv. Elisabethpol Chuliysk Gorge, 40 versts from Askhabad, Transcaspia.” Unjustified emendation of Myoxus glis caspius Satunin, 1905.

Glis glis spoliatus: Thomas, 1906:220. Type locality “Khotz, near Trebizond” ( =  Çosandere, Trabzon, Turkey—Kryštufek and Vohralík 2005); first use of current name combination.

Glis melonii Thomas, 1907:445. Type locality “Marcurighè, Urzulei, Ogliastra, Sardinia,” Italy.

Glis glis pyrenaicus Cabrera, 1908:193. Type locality “neighborhood of Allo, province of Navara,” Spain.

Glis italicus intermedius Altobello, 1920:22. No type locality specified.

Glis glis subalpinus Burg, 1920:419. Type locality “Münstertal” Val Müstair, Kanton Graubünden, Swizerland.

Glis glis tshetshenicus Satunin, 1920:150. Type locality “Chechn' na r. Shara-Argun” ( =  Shara Argun' River, tributary of the Terek—Ognev 1963).

Glis glis postus Montagu, 1923:866. Type locality “Veliki Dergonel [ =  Veliki Drgomalj—Petrov 1992], the Gorski Kotar, Croatia.”

Glis glis abrutti Altobello, 1924:35. Type locality “Abruzzi e Molise,” Italy.

Glis glis minutus Martino, 1930:60. Type locality “Predejane, 30 klm. S. from Leskovac. Serbia.”

Glis glis petruccii Goodwin, 1939:1. Type locality “Gouladah foothills of the Kurkhud Mountains, district Bujnurd, northeastern Iran, alt. about 3,000 ft.

Glis glis vagneri Martino and Martino, 1941:9. Type locality “Vrhpolje, Kamnik, Kamniške Alpe ( =  Steiner Alps), Slovenia.”

Glis glis intermedius Martino and Martino, 1941:9. Type locality “Presaća [ =  Pesača—Petrov 1992], Donji Milanovac, N. E. Serbia.”

Glis glis argenteus Zimmermann, 1953:28. Type locality “Wäldern der Weissen Berge, Kreta” ( =  White Mts, near Samaria, Crete, 1,000 m—Corbet 1978).

Glis glis martinoi Mirić, 1960:36. Replacement name for Glis glis intermedius Martino and Martino, 1941, preoccupied by Glis italicus intermedius, Altobello, 1920.

Glis glis pindicus Ondrias, 1966:25. Type locality “Moni Stomiou, near Konitsa, Epirus, Greece, 1600 m.”

Glis glis germanicus Violani and Zava, 1995:112. Type locality “Marxheim, Bavaria, Germany.”

Context and Content. Context as for genus. Subspecific variation was not assessed across the entire range; 10 subspecies of unresolved geographical boundaries are tentatively recognized (Corbet 1978).

Nomenclatural Notes. Until recently there was continuous uncertainty over the validity of the generic names Myoxus and Glis. Many argue that Brisson's (1762) names are invalid because they are not Linnean or binomial and the name Myoxus is the oldest valid generic name (Holden 2005; Hopwood 1947; Wahlert et al. 1993). However, Glis was conserved, based on the argument that this name has had historical common usage, by a ruling of the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (Opinion 1894 [International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature 1998]; includes comments and original literature associated with the opinion).

The generic and specific name glis (genitive gliris) means a dormouse (Gotch 1995). Glis (or glir, gliris, or glirus) was quoted by many early authors starting with T. M. Plautus in 3rd to 2nd century BC and is either derived from the Sanskrit girich or from the verb gliscere, which means to grow (Carpaneto and Cristaldi 1995).

DIAGNOSIS

Glis is distinguished from other dormice (Gliridae) as follows (Storch 1995; Wahlert et al. 1993): glans penis without spines on lateral pads, sphenofrontal and stapedial foramina lost, lateral pterygoid process short and fossa pterygoidea reduced, coronoid process of lower jaw arises in an anterior position and conceals m3 in lateral view, angular process of lower jaw not perforated, molars only slightly concave and main cusps weak, and protoloph separated from metaloph.

Glis glis is externally recognizable by a combination of large size (head and body length > 123 mm; usually 160–190 mm), long tail (length up to 168 mm), small ears (extending barely to eye when laid forward), grayish dorsum and white belly, absence of black pattern on face, bushy tail uniformly haired throughout and conspicuously distichous, and 4–6 pairs of nipples (Miller 1912; Storch 1978).

GENERAL CHARACTERS

Glis glis (Fig. 1), the largest dormouse, is squirrel-like in general form and appearance. Both sexes are about the same size (Kryštufek 2001). Means (SD, n) of adult body measurements (mm) of specimens from Austria were: length of head and body 152.60 (9.41, 55), length of tail 124.50 (9.64, 52), length of hind foot 26.79 (2.32, 48), length of ear 18.52 (1.90, 46—Spitzenberger 2001).

Figure 1

Adult Glis glis from Mt. Kočevski Rog, Slovenia. Photograph courtesy of A. Kryštufek.

i1545-1410-42-865-195-f01.tif

Pelage consists of soft underfur interspersed on the back with long, coarse guard hairs. Tail is bushy and flattened dorsoventrally. Upper parts range from a grayish brown (“yellowish broccoli-brown”—Miller 1912:577) to bluish smoke-gray, darkest along the spine and lighter on flanks. A narrow dusky ring occurs around eyes. Underparts and inner surface of legs are white to pale buff and the line of demarcation is rather well defined. Tail is like back but usually darker. Young are dull plumbeous gray above, white below (Miller 1912). Albino and melanistic animals are rare (frequency < 10−3) and albinos do not survive more than 2 years (Kryštufek 2007).

Ears are relatively short and rounded. Legs are short and feet are more robust than in other European dormice. Front feet and hind feet have 4 and 5 digits, respectively. Palm and sole are naked (Miller 1912).

Skull is rather deep and broad, with widely expanded zygomatic arches (Fig. 2). Interorbital region is moderately broad and inconspicuously ridged. Braincase is squarish and smooth; deep rostrum tapers toward point. Incisive foramina are short but broad; diastema is longer than maxillary toothrow. Auditory bullae are moderately enlarged and only slightly pneumatized. Mandible is robust and all 3 processes are well developed; the angular process is not perforated (Miller 1912; Potapova 2001). Means (SD, n) of adult cranial measurements (mm) of specimens from Austria were: condylobasal length 36.02 (1.33, 64), length of maxillary toothrow 6.66 (0.22, 76), length of diastema 9.31 (0.51, 81), zygomatic width 22.46 (0.89, 68), width of interorbital constriction 4.95 (0.15, 80), length of mandible 22.36 (0.93, 81—Spitzenberger 2001). Overall body size varies geographically (Storch 1978).

Figure 2

Dorsal, ventral, and lateral views of skull and lateral view of mandible of Glis glis (adult female from Donje Bare, Mt. Zelengora, Bosnia and Herzegovina; Slovenian Museum of Natural History 2005/633). Greatest length of skull is 43.0 mm. Photographs by C. Mlinar used with permission.

i1545-1410-42-865-195-f02.tif

Upper cheek teeth are squarish, M1 and M2 are the largest and subequal, and premolars are the smallest. Crowns are low and nearly flat but lateral borders are slightly raised. The crown of each tooth is crossed by low and finely spaced ridges (Miller 1912). Upper molars have 3 roots each, lower molars and P4 are double rooted, and p4 has a single root (Storch 1978).

DISTRIBUTION

The range mainly coincides with the deciduous forest zone in the western Palearctic (Fig. 3). Glis glis is widespread in western, central, and southeastern Europe except Denmark, the Atlantic coasts of the Low Countries, and France; it is also absent from the majority of the Iberian Peninsula (Storch 1978). The range is mosaic in deforested regions of central Europe and in the forest–steppe zone in Moldova, Ukraine, and Russia. Range in Russia is in 2 main parts, the western and the eastern, with additional scattered isolates (Likhachev 1972). The northern border follows the line of Gauja National Park (Latvia—Valdis 2003)–Pskovk–River Oka–Upper Volga. The River Volga is also the eastern boundary of distribution and the only occurrences on its east bank are at Makaryev and Samarskaa Luka (Rossolimo et al. 2001). Range in Anatolia is presumably disjunct (Kryštufek and Vohralík 2005). In the Caucasus, G. glis extends as far north as Krasnodarsk and the River Kuban and reaches across Armenia and Azerbaijan (Rossolimo et al. 2001) on the southern coast of the Caspian Sea in Iran as far east as Gouladah, Khorassan (Lay 1967). A report from Turkmenistan is dubious (Ognev 1963; Rossolimo et al. 2001). G. glis was reported from 19 islands in the Mediterranean (Elba, Salina, Corsica, Sardinia, Sicily, Krk, Cres, Brač, Hvar, Korčula, Mljet, Lastovo, Corfu, Keffalinia, Ándros, and Crete—Carpaneto and Cristaldi 1995; Dimaki 1999; Storch 1978; Tvrtković et al. 1995) and Baltic (Rügen, Usedom, and Wolin—Bitz 1990) seas. In 1902 G. glis was introduced, possibly from Hungary, to Tring Park about 100 km northwest of London, England. The population spread very little after 90 years and remained within about 35 km of its point of introduction (Jackson 1994; Morris 1997).

Elevational range is from sea level to the upper margin of deciduous and mixed forests: up to 1,545 m in the Alps (Spitzenberger 2001), and 2,000 m in the Pyrenees (Storch 1978) and the Caucasus (Rossolimo et al. 2001).

FOSSIL RECORD

Ten fossil species of Glis have been tentatively recognized since the middle Oligocene. In Miocene faunas the genus is rare but becomes common in central Europe from the Pliocene onward (Daams and de Bruijn 1995). In the Pliocene and Pleistocene only 1 well-established lineage possibly remained in which G. sackdillingensis (early Pleistocene) links G. minor (Pliocene) with the recent G. glis. The recent species probably emerged in the early-middle Pleistocene deposits and was afterward widespread across Europe west of Russia (Kowalski 2001); reports from the lower Pleistocene are dubious (Maul 1990). Eastward expansion was evidently postponed given that the earliest evidence from the Russian Plain is from early-late Pleistocene (Markova 2000). After the Last Glacial Maximum (about 19,000 years ago), central Europe was recolonized at the beginning of the Holocene (Horáček 1986).

FORM AND FUNCTION

Form

The glans penis (length 9.6–11.3 mm, width 3.5–4.0 mm) is club-shaped, with a small, sharp protrusion. The ventral side is creased by longitudinal folds and covered with small spines. Baculum (length 8.5–9.5 mm, width 2.4–2.6 mm) is of simple triangular shape with pointed apex that usually bends laterally (Kratochvíl 1973).

Females have 8–12 nipples (Koenig 1960; Miller 1912; Storch 1978). Ten nipples are the most common count in specimens from Slovenia (82% of specimens, n  =  51), followed by 11 (13.7%) and 12 (3.9%—Kryštufek 2004). Mean nipple count in specimens from northern Italy is 11.25 ± 0.85 SD (range  =  10–12, n  =  20—Marin and Pilastro 1994).

Dental formula is i 1/1, c 0/0, p 1/1, m 3/3, total 20 (Miller 1912). Enamel is 36 µm thick on upper incisors and 39 µm on lower incisors, which is less than in other dormice (Hillson 1990).

In young, sexually inactive individuals the paired tubuloalveolar circumanal glands produce secretions, but the glandular activity is most intense during the peak of sexual activity (Hrabě 1971). Active secretion of the bulbouretral gland also peaks in reproductively active males (Hrabě 1968).

Glis glis changes pelage slowly, molting and replacing hairs over a full year (Morris 2004). Guard hairs are oval in cross section with a diameter of about 55 µm; medulla is relatively small and indistinct (Teerink 1991). Skin on tail breaks readily when grasped and easily slides off from tail vertebrae. The animal amputates the exposed vertebrae and the stump partly regenerates and puts forth a dense brush of long hairs (Jones-Walters and Corbet 1991). In comparison to other rodents, G. glis has relatively long vibrissae organized on the head in 7 groups (Sokolov and Kulikov 1987).

Function

At an ambient temperature (Ta) of 28°C, body temperature (Tb)  =  36.7°C ± 0.79°C SD and is at an optimum point, and oxygen consumption is 0.552 ml O2 g−1 h−1 ± 0.051 SD, heart rate is maintained at 170–200 beats/min, and the resting ventilation frequency is about 40 breaths/min (mean oxygen pulse of 54 µl O2 per breath—Wilz and Heldmaier 2000). The daily energy budget of active Glis glis (23.61 kcal animal−1 day−1 at Ta  =  20°C) is identical with that of nonhibernating rodents. The resting metabolic rate (ml O2 g−1 h−1 °C−1) is significantly higher in spring (1.14) than in autumn (0.81; both at Ta  =  20°C—Gębczyński et al. 1972). Mean body temperature, heart rate, and oxygen consumption are higher during the night compared to daytime (Elvert and Heldmaier 2000; Gębczyński et al. 1972). Captive individuals of G. glis at normal body temperature are nocturnal (Elvert and Heldmaier 2000) and monophasic (Koenig 1960; Rodolfi 1994).

Glis glis is capable of all 3 distinct forms of dormancy that are based on the same physiological mechanism of thermal and metabolic regulation, but differ in bout length. In captive G. glis, bouts are shortest in daily torpor (3–21 h), intermediate in aestivation (69–106 h), and longest in hibernation (39–768 h). The average minimum metabolic rate (in ml O2 g−1 h−1) correlates with ambient temperature and is the lowest during hibernation (about 0.017), intermediate during aestivation (0.031), and the highest during daily torpor (0.053—Wilz and Heldmaier 2000). Limiting food availability results in an increase in frequency of daily torpor until the animals enter hibernation (Elvert and Heldmaier 2000).

Glis glis hibernates over the winter period, normally for 7–8 months, from October to May. It does not store food before hibernation and relies instead on body fat reserves that accumulate in autumn (Vietinghoff-Riesch 1960). Body mass roughly doubles prior to hibernation, from the normal 120–150 g to more than 250 g in individuals from England (Morris 2004). During the prehibernation fattening period, G. glis eats lipid-rich food with a high content of linoleic acid (Fietz et al. 2005). Entry into torpor occurs in the same coordinated manner for hibernation, aestivation, or daily torpor (Elvert and Heldmaier 2005). Minimum body temperature (0.7°C at Ta  =  0°C—Wilz and Heldmaier 2000) is reached about 6 h after metabolic functions have reached their minimum (Elvert and Heldmaier 2005). In steady-state torpor the metabolic rate remains unchanged (0.0382 ml O2 g−1 h−1 ± 0.0037 SD) and shows no relation with ambient temperature. Heart rate is 8.2 beats/min at Tb  =  7°C (Elvert and Heldmaier 2005). The duration of apnea is up to 60 min at Tb  =  4.5°C (Wilz et al. 2000). Blood glucose is low during dormancy, whereas plasma insulin remains at the same level as in normothermic animals (Castex et al. 1984).

The duration of arousal from dormancy is temperature dependent: 1.2 h at Ta  =  22°C and up to 9 h at Ta  =  2°C (Wilz and Heldmaier 2000). Reduction in body mass (up to one-third) during hibernation correlates negatively with the prehibernation linoleic acid content in the white adipose tissue (Fietz et al. 2004).

In captive G. glis, cycles with a period of about 2 months occur in body mass, food and water intake, maturation of spermatozoa, body temperature, wheel-running activity, and weight of the liver, adrenal and salivary glands, and testes (Mrosovsky et al. 1980). Infradian body-mass cycles are programmed independently from changes in gonadal activity (Joy 1981). The testis cycle is induced by the thyroid cycle which, in turn, is synchronized with annual temperature and not with photoperiod (Jallageas et al. 1991).

ONTOGENY AND REPRODUCTION

Ontogeny

Young Glis glis are helpless at birth, with ears and eyes closed. By 16 days the pelage is well developed, eyes open at 21–23 days, and by 30 days they can leave the nest (Jones-Walters and Corbet 1991). Total birth mass (g) varies between 4.5 (1 juvenile in a litter) and 26 (9 juveniles—Bieber and Ruf 2004). Body mass at birth is 2 g in European Turkey (Özkan 2006), 3.4 g in Anatolia (Çolak et al. 1997), and 3.7 g ± 0.6 SD (n  =  21) in Austria (Bieber and Ruf 2004). The seasonal onset of reproduction is extremely late in G. glis (Bieber and Ruf 2004) and juveniles need to reach viable size within less than 12 weeks to survive winter (Morris 2004). Mean daily mass gain (g) within about 1st month is 0.93 in European Turkey (n  =  25—Özkan 2006) and 1.9 in England (n  =  47—Burgess et al. 2003). Within 30 days juveniles reach a body mass of 39.2 g ± 5.9 SD (n  =  48—Bieber and Ruf 2004). Daily growth rate in young that are 30 days of age is negatively correlated with litter size: 1.651 g (n  =  3) versus 0.839 g (n  =  7—Pilastro 1992). Lactation lasts 25–30 days (Ognev 1963).

Thermoregulatory mechanisms of G. glis develop more slowly in comparison to nonhibernating rodents. Metabolic rate (ml O2 g−1 h−1) is low until the age of 15 days (1.51 at age 7 days; Ta  =  20°C) but rises afterward to 17.9 ± 1.3 SD (age 15 days) and 34.4 ± 1.0 SD (26 days). Metabolism stabilizes after young attain 3 weeks of age (Gębczyński 1981). Mean survivorship rate over the hibernation period is low in juveniles (0.21—Burgess et al. 2003) and varies in adults from 0.27 (England—Burgess et al. 2003) to 0.86 (northern Italy—Pilastro et al. 2003). Adult life expectancy is up to about 9 years in nature (range 6–12 years—Pilastro et al. 2003) and maximum age recorded in captivity is 9 years (Vietinghoff-Riesch 1960).

Reproduction

The testes descend into the scrotum after Glis glis has terminated hibernation. Mean mass (mg; n) of 1 testis is high in May (780, 4), June (712, 17), and 1st half of July (816, 11), and low in 2nd half of July (377, 8) and August (355, 5—Kryštufek 2001). Paired testes mass > 550 mg indicates spermatogenesis (Joy et al. 1980). In males reduced body temperature and gonadal development are mutually exclusive and Tb  =  30°C is the critical lower limit enabling the start of the testosterone cycle (Jallageas and Assenmacher 1984). Reproductive condition in males does not depend on their body mass (Fietz et al. 2005; Kryštufek et al. 2003).

Females reach sexual maturity when 351–380 days old (Özkan 2006). Although they occasionally reproduce after their 1st hibernation in Continental Europe (Özkan 2006; Pilastro 1992), they sometimes do not breed until 3rd calendar year in England (Morris 2004).

Glis glis produces a single litter per year, although reproductive failure may occur in some years with poor food supply (Gaisler et al. 1977; Ivashkina 2006; Morris 2004; Ognev 1963; Pilastro 1992). Mating season is between the end of June and the beginning of July (central Germany—Bieber and Ruf 2004) and 15 June and 18 August (European Turkey—Özkan 2006). Gestation lasts 20–25 days (Caucasus—Ognev 1963), 28 days (Slovenia—Kryštufek 2007), and 30–31 days (Germany—Koenig 1960). Young are born between 26 July and 19 August in Germany (Schlund and Scharfe 1997). In England 93% of births occur in August (Burgess et al. 2003).

Mean litter size (range, n), based on embryos and placental scar counts, was 5.0 in northern Moravia (3–8, 12—Gaisler et al. 1977) and 5.8 in Slovenia (4–9, 9—Kryštufek 2001). Embryonic mortality was 14.3–21% in the Caucasus (Ognev 1963). Mean number of suckling juveniles per female (range, n) was 4.75 (2–7, 44) in northern Italy (Pilastro 1992), 4.9 (1–10, 24) in Slovenia (Kryštufek 2007), 5.5 (2–8, 8) in Sicily (Milazzo et al. 2003), 6.05 (1–12, 100) in European Turkey (Özkan 2006), and 6.8 (1–11, 49) in England (Burgess et al. 2003). Mean litter size is higher in adult females compared to yearlings (Ruf et al. 2006), and does not differ among years (Pilasto et al. 2003) but depends on habitat (Ruf et al. 2006; Schlund and Scharfe 1997).

During a 9-year study period in Germany, 75.0% of females had 1 litter, 21.4% had 2 litters, 2.9% had 3 litters, and 0.7% had 5 litters (n  =  140—Ruf et al. 2006).

ECOLOGY

Principal habitat is deciduous and mixed woodland with a high proportion of mast seeders (Jones-Walters and Corbet 1991; Rossolimo et al. 2001). Preferred habitats are forest edge with sparse trees but dense herb and shrub stratum (Gaisler et al. 1977), structured forest with high trees and dense understory (Milazzo et al. 2003), and denser forest stands with well-connected tree canopies (Juškaitis and Šiožinytė 2008). Geomorphologically diverse areas with cliffs, caves, and sinkholes are preferred over lowland forests (Anděra 1986). Beech (Fagus) woodland mixed with Castanea sativa, Ostrya, Abies, and Picea is inhabited throughout the range (Kryštufek and Vohralík 2005; Ognev 1963; Storch 1978). Deciduous oak (Quercus) forests are the principal habitat along the northern range (Juškaitis 1995) and in Russia (Ivashkina 2006). Under the Mediterranean clime Glis glis occurs in evergreen woodland and tall maquis vegetation (Tvrtković et al. 1995). Deciduous shrubs, orchards (Jones-Walters and Corbet 1991), and parks are also inhabited, but coniferous forests and pine plantations are avoided (Anděra 1986). G. glis readily enters beehives (Juškaitis 1995) and houses (Morris 1997). In central Europe, G. glis frequently occurs on the outskirts of towns and it has entered cities as large as Prague (Anděra 1986).

Caves are inhabited wherever present (Hrabě 1971; Rossolimo et al. 2001). Animals were detected up to 2,500 m inside the cave and up to 400 m deep. Shafts are more frequently utilized than horizontal caves and the majority of dormice shelters are inaccessible for the beech marten (Martes foinaPolak 1997).

Key trees in the majority of deciduous forests (Quercus and Fagus) are mast seeders, producing large seed crops every 2–6 years, whereas production in the intervening years is low or even fails. Although the major physiological event in the annual cycle of G. glis is hibernation (see “Function”), the animal responds to strong year-to-year fluctuations in food availability by skipping reproduction. In years with a lack of masting trees G. glis typically remains sexually inactive (Pilastro et al. 2003). Proportion of breeding females varies from 0 in years of reproductive failure, to 19.8–91.2% in breeding years (Pilastro et al. 2003). Parturition is postponed about 3 months after the start of the vegetation period, which gives juveniles and lactating females access to beech mast of higher fat content (43.1% on 9 August as compared to 15.8% on 19 July—Bieber and Ruf 2004). Females in good condition breed 1st, lose body mass during lactation, and wean litters when food availability is optimal, which allows young to gain maximal prehibernation body mass. Females in poor condition postpone parturition and do not lose weight during lactation because it coincides with the peak of food supply, but young run short of time and do not reach maximal weight prior to hibernation. Males are heavier in nonreproductive years than during reproductive years (Pilastro et al. 2003). Variability in reproductive effort among years leads to differences in yearly survival rates in both sexes. Survival rates are significantly lower in dormice that are 2 years or older after reproductive years (0.32 ± 0.04 SD, n  =  5) compared to years with absent or below average reproduction (0.58 ± 0.07 SD, n  =  4—Ruf et al. 2006).

With the absence of new recruits in some years there is considerable interannual variability in population density, for example 0.6–4.1individuals/ha over 6 years in England (Burgess et al. 2003). The periodicity of peak densities is 1–3 years in Slovenia (X ¯  =  1.55, n  =  33—Kryštufek and Zavodnik 2003).

Adult densities (individuals/ha) are 0.6–1.8 in England (Hoodless and Morris 1993), about 6 in Slovenia (Kryštufek et al. 2003), and 2.3–22 in Germany (Bieber 1995). In central Europe densities have doubled over the last 2–3 decades (Adamík and Král 2008; Koppmann-Rumpf et al. 2003). In the adult category, 49% of G. glis are >2 years old and 11% are >4 years old (n  =  81). Females attain higher mean age (3.3 years) than males (2.2 years—Kryštufek et al. 2005).

Glis glis travels only as far as necessary to find suitable food. The areas used each night (ha) are small (0.05 in a female and 0.56 in a male) and the mean distance traveled was 523 m per night for a male and 111 m for a female (Morris and Hoodless 1992). Distances covered each night by males are larger in a low-density population than in a high-density population (Jurczyszyn and Zgrabczyńska 2007). G. glis disperses over at least 46 m of treeless agricultural land. Adult males disperse during peak reproductive periods and juveniles when about 2 months of age (Bieber 1995). Habitat fidelity is high and shifts between woodlands 1 km apart are rare (Ruf et al. 2006).

Males have significantly larger home ranges and use more nest sites than females (Ściński and Borowski 2008). Home ranges (ha) in continental Europe are 0.15–0.76 (females) and 0.82–7.0 (males—Jurczyszyn 2006; Ściński and Borowski 2008). Home-range size is density dependent (Jurczyszyn and Zgrabczyńska 2007) and also relates to energetic value of mast but does not depend on reproductive activity (Ściński and Borowski 2008). Mean overlap in home ranges (in %) is higher among males (from 57.2 ± 30.3 SD to 74.9 ± 23.4 SD) than in females (from 0 to 25.7 ± 20.5 SDŚciński and Borowski 2008).

Glis glis is predominantly a vegetarian. An excellent source of food, particularly for young and lactating females, is beech mast, which is rich in energy and protein content (27%—Bieber and Ruf 2004). In a predominantly oak forest in the Pyrenees, fleshy fruits (blackberry, apple, bilberry, and rowan-berry) form the bulk of the diet (frequency  =  46.5%) and are eaten regardless of the degree of ripeness. Next in importance are nuts (acorns and hazelnuts; 37.0%), followed by leaves and flowers (8.0%), arthropods (6.9%), fungi (1.1%), and mosses (0.5%). Nuts are most prevalent in the diet in September and October, and arthropods in July (Gigirey and Rey 1999). In a deciduous forest in Slovakia, the basic diet in early summer is composed of buds and bark of Euonymus verrucosus, whereas fruits of the hazelnut, Cornus mas, Carpinus betulus, and Acer campestre become important in full summer (Holišová 1968). In the Caucasus region, the 1st diet in late May and early June consists of bark and in June of unripe fruits. In late summer and in autumn acorns and beech nuts form the staple diet (Ognev 1963). In England free-living G. glis fed mainly on fruits of yew and berries of elder in addition to hazelnuts, acorns, blackberries, apples, and pears (Morris and Hoodless 1992).

Feeding on preferred diet continues until the supply runs out; for example, total intake of hazelnuts corresponded to 84.5% (1988) and 91.2% (1989) of the crop in Italy (Rodolfi 1994). Invertebrates (slugs, caterpillars, aphids, myriapods, and beetles) are only a supplementary diet and predation on vertebrates is unusual (Holišová 1968; Ognev 1963). G. glis becomes carnivorous in some populations and may consume eggs of hole-nesting birds and kill and eat both nestlings and incubating parents (Adamík and Král 2008; Juškaitis 2006).

In some areas G. glis competes for nest boxes with hole-nesting birds. In the past, the dormouse and birds had a distinct temporal pattern of cavity use that has been disturbed in the last decades by a changing climate in central Europe due to unequal shifts in phenology. Although the phenology for G. glis advanced (days/decade) by about 8, this is at most only 3.5 in birds. The growth of numbers of G. glis is positively correlated with the number of predated nests of European pied flycathcer (Ficedula hypoleuca), collared flycatcher (F. albicollis), blue tit (Parus caeruleus), great tit (P. major), and Eurasian nuthatch (Sitta europaeaAdamík and Král 2008; Juškaitis 2006; Koppmann-Rumpf et al. 2003). G. glis also outcompetes smaller dormice (forest dormouse [Dryomys nitedula] and hazel dormouse [Muscardinus avellanarius]) from nest boxes (Bakó and Hecker 2006).

At least 14 species of vertebrates prey on G. glis: 1 snake (common European adder [Vipera berus]), 5 birds (barn owl [Tyto alba], Eurasian tawny owl [Strix aluco], long-eared owl [Asio otus], little owl [Athene noctua], and golden eagle [Aquila chrysaetos]) and 8 mammals (roof rat [Rattus rattus], wolf [Canis lupus], red fox [Vulpes vulpes], brown bear [Ursus arctos], European pine marten [Martes martes], M. foina, wildcat [Felis silvestris], and wild boar [Sus scrofa]); the majority of predation is occasional (Scaravelli and Aloise 1995). Locally G. glis is important prey of owls and medium-sized carnivores. For example, G. glis comprised 47% of total biomass preyed upon by the Eurasian tawny owl in Sicily (Sara and Casamento 1995) and 50% of predated animals in the middle Volga region (Ivashkina 2006).

Sixty-three species parasitize G. glis: 1 Sporozoa, 2 Trematoda, 6 Nematoda, 16 Acari, 1 Heteroptera, 2 Anoplura, and 35 Siphonaptera (Kryštufek 2007). The proportion of G. glis infected by the flea Ceratopsyllus sciurorum is 75–100% in the Caucasus (Rossolimo et al. 2001). Infection by ectoparasites is higher in adults than in juveniles and higher in males as compared to females (Kirillova et al. 2006). Two encephalocarditis viral strains were isolated from G. glis in Tuscany, Italy (Carpaneto and Cristaldi 1995). G. glis is a host of Hantaan virus in Slovenia (prevalence of 13.3%, n  =  98—Prosenc et al. 1997) and of Borrelia spirochetes in Croatia (prevalence of <10%, n  =  45—Turk et al. 2008).

Glis glis sporadically causes damage in silvicultural practice by bark-stripping of Norway spruce, European larch, Scots pine, cypress, and birch. Damage mainly occurs in June and July (Morris 2004). The average loss of discounted revenue was 25% in England (Jackson 1994). Damage also occurs in orchards on various fruit trees, including apples, pears, peach, grape, hazel, Persian walnut, figs, and almond (Carpaneto and Cristaldi 1995; Morris 2004; Ognev 1963; Yiğit et al. 2001). Loss to crops can be considerable; for example, 12.5–41.7% to grape in the Caucasus (Ognev 1963) and 50–60% to hazelnut in Italy (Santini 1993). In the past, when G. glis becomes a real economic problem control measures were implemented (Jackson 1994).

During the Roman age, G. glis was prized as a culinary delicacy and was bred in walled gardens of oak (gliraria) and fattened up on currants and chestnuts in large earthenware pots (dolia) for the table (Jackson 1994; Morris 2004). In Mediterranean Europe (Spain, France, Italy, Slovenia, and Croatia) and in Russia, dormice were hunted for food, fur, and medical utilization (Carpaneto and Cristaldi 1995; Ivashkina 2006; Kryštufek and Haberl 2001). Various hunting techniques were practiced in different countries but mainly trapping and shooting. In Italy hunting was still widespread in the 20th century (Carpaneto and Cristaldi 1995). G. glis is a game species in Slovenia (hunting season 1 October–15 November) and in Croatia (16 September–30 November—Kryštufek 2007). Impact of hunting is little known but might be considerable; for example, an estimated >3 dormice/ha may be taken during peak years in Slovenia. Hunting of G. glis occurred as early as 1240 in Slovenia and is still practiced today (Kryštufek and Haberl 2001).

BEHAVIOR

Duration of nocturnal activity depends on the length of the day and is longest in September (11 h) and shortest in August (4 h—Rodolfi 1994). During the day, Glis glis tends to lie up in nests, built like squirrel dreys or taken over from birds, and it also uses hollow trees, especially mature beeches (Morris 2004). Nests in nest boxes are rudimentary; the box is simply filled with fresh leaves (Milazzo et al. 2003), or has no nest material at all. G. glis sleeps and hibernates tightly curled up, its tail wrapped over its head and back (Morris 2004).

Glis glis normally hibernates underground in the soft soil (Jurczyszyn 2007; Morris and Hoodless 1992) or in caves (Polak 1997), occasionally in cellars (Valdis 2003; Vogel 1997), but not in nest boxes (Milazzo et al. 2003). Hibernation cavities of free-living G. glis have an oval shape (volume 429–1,174 cm3, n  =  27) and are located 18–70 cm underground, frequently found close to roots of old trees (Jurczyszyn 2007). G. glis digs cavities on its own (Jurczyszyn 2007) or uses rabbit holes, fox earths, and badger setts (Morris 2004). No nesting material is used in hibernacula (Jurczyszyn 2007). In Poland communally hibernating G. glis were observed only under captive conditions (up to 2 dormice) but not in nature (Jurczyszyn 2007). Contrary to this, 2 hibernacula in England contained 3 dormice of both sexes each (Morris and Hoodless 1992) and in Switzerland 11 were found hibernating in a wooden container (Vogel 1997).

Glis glis is an agile climber capable of moving down tree trunks headfirst and clinging from branches by its hind feet. During climbing on smooth surfaces grip is assisted by sticky secretions of plantar glands (Koenig 1960). As an arboreal animal it is reluctant to descend to the ground and 63% of position fixes were 3–5 m above the ground (Morris and Hoodless 1992). Dormice are poor jumpers (maximum 1 m) and are able to swim (Koenig 1960).

Glis glis explores its environment by forwardly oriented mystacial vibrissae, relying on tactile information and ignoring optic boundaries (Sokolov and Kulikov 1987). Hearing sensitivity is fairly uniform without significant maxima and minima in the frequency range from <1 kHz to >35 kHz (Hutterer and Peters 2001). Acoustic communication is through a variety of squeaks, snuffling noises, and churring (Jones-Walters and Corbet 1991). G. glis leaves scent trails from scent glands on feet and circumanal glands around the base of tail (Morris 2004). The animal rubs its anal region on the substrate thus leaving traces of the secretion. Scent-trailing behavior has been observed in animals as young as 21 days of age but the activity of these glands increases during sexual activity (Hrabě 1971; Koenig 1960). G. glis also deposits piles of droppings in latrines and on top of its nest boxes (Morris 2004).

Glis glis is reported to be a nonsocial species (Marin and Pilastro 1994) or social and living in loose groups (Koenig 1960; Morris 2004). Mating system is polygamous (Vietinghoff-Riesch 1960) and presumably promiscuous (Ściński and Borowski 2008). Females are territorial and the nonterritorial males directly compete for access to receptive females (Ściński and Borowski 2008). Males become aggressive during the mating period and may exhibit a variety of threatening postures (Jones-Walters and Corbet 1991). During courtship a squeaking male closely follows the female, mounts after a circular dance, bites the female's shoulders, and copulates. Close-kin breeding females occasionally share the same nest and communally nurse their young. In northern Italy 109 nests were single and 19 were communal (Marin and Pilastro 1994).

Young animals lick the mother's mouth and ingest saliva before and after they leave the nest (Jones-Walters and Corbet 1991). The mother also provides young with chewed pulp of food from her own mouth (Morris 2004) and grooms them (Koenig 1960).

Livetrapping was successful in population studies in Poland (Ściński and Borowski 2008) and Russia (Ivashkina 2006) but not in England (Hoodless and Morris 1993). Nest boxes (e.g., 30 by 10 by 15 cm with a diameter of the entrance hole of 50–55 mm—Burgess et al. 2003) are used in population monitoring in various parts of the range (Milazzo et al. 2003). “Nest tubes” are an inexpensive modification of nest boxes (Morris 2004); however, dormice prefer wooden boxes over tubes (Bakó and Hecker 2006). The entire population is not active simultaneously over the entire active period and July is proposed as the most suitable period for undertaking adult population density estimates (Kryštufek et al. 2003; Schlund and Scharfe 1997). Distance sampling of vocal dormice along a linear transect (about 550 m in length) was adopted in population density assessment (Hoodless and Morris 1993). Estimates are 2.5- to 3.3-fold higher than those obtained from surveying nest boxes (Jurczyszyn 1995).

GENETICS

The diploid number for Glis glis is 62. All the autosomes are metacentric and submetacentric (FNa  =  120). The X chromosome is a medium-sized submetacentric or metacentric. The dot-like Y chromosome is acrocentric or biarmed. The chromosome bearing the nuclear organizing region is a medium-sized metacentric pair (chromosome 16—Civitelli et al. 1995).

The mitochondrial DNA of G. glis conforms to that of other mammalian species: it is 16,602 base pairs and encodes for 13 protein-coding genes, 2 ribosomal rRNAs, and 22 tRNAs. The control region is 1,157 nucleotides and does not contain repetitive motifs (Reyes et al. 1998).

Differentiation in gene markers such as protein allozymes occurs among populations of G. glis. Nei's unbiased genetic distances at 42 loci range between D  =  0.011 and 0.090. Levels of intrapopulation genetic variation are within the range generally reported for other rodents: proportion of monomorphic loci  =  59% (n  =  42), mean observed heterozygosity per locus HO  =  0.040, and average number of alleles per locus A  =  1.154 (Filippucci and Kotsakis 1995). Variability in 12 nonmetric cranial traits suggests low phenotypic diversity among 6 Bulgarian populations (Markov 2001).

Sequence data consisting of 831 base pairs of the cytochrome-b gene revealed the presence of 3 main haplogroups (Sicilian, Southern Italian, and European), which are presumed to be a legacy of an earlier fragmentation of the range during the Quaternary glacial–interglacial dynamics and survival of glacial peaks in classical Mediterranean rufugia in southern Europe. The widespread European lineage bears a strong footprint of a recent population expansion from a single unidentified refugium and dated at about 2,000 years ago (Hürner et al. 2010).

CONSERVATION

Glis glis is a species of conservation concern along its northern range where populations are fragmented and densities low; for example, in Lithuania (Juškaitis 1995), Latvia (Pilāts 1995), and Poland (Jurczyszyn 2001). A reintroduction program was initiated in Poland in 1997 (Jurczyszyn 2001). All European Community countries are contracting parties to the Bern Convention, which lists G. glis in Appendix III (Kryštufek 1999). The International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Red List ranks G. glis as “Lower Risk—Near Threatened” (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources 2008).

Acknowledgments

I thank P. A. Morris, R. Trout, P. Adamik, L. C. Maul, and 2 anonymous reviewers for comments on an earlier draft. S. Engelberger, G. Amori, B. Herzig, W. Haberl, M. Paunović, E. V. Bužan, and J. Skok helped with literature.

LITERATURE CITED

1.

P. Adamík and M. Král . 2008. Climate- and resource-driven long-term changes in dormice populations negatively affect hole-nesting songbirds. Journal of Zoology (London) 275:209–215. Google Scholar

2.

G. Altobello 1920. Fauna dell'Abruzzo e del Molise. Vertebrati, Mammiferi III. I Rosicanti(Rodentia). Colitti ed. Campobasso, Italy. Google Scholar

3.

G. Altobello 1924. Nuove forme di mammiferi italiani del Molise e dell'Abruzzo. Rendiconto della Auattordicesima Assembla Generale Ordinaria e del Convegno dell' Unione Zoologica Italiana in Genoa (8–11 Ottobre 1923) 25–36. Google Scholar

4.

M. Andeěa 1986. Dormice (Gliridae) in Czechoslovakia. Part I.: Glis glis, Eliomys quercinus (Rodentia: Mammalia). Folia Musei Rerum Naturalium Bohemiae Occidentalis, Plzeň, Zoologica 24:3–47. Google Scholar

5.

B. Bakó and K. Hecker . 2006. Factors determing the distribution of coexisting dormouse species (Gliridae, Rodentia). Polish Journal of Ecology 54:379–386. Google Scholar

6.

G. E. H. Barrett-Hamilton 1898. Notes on the European dormice of the genera Muscardinus and Glis. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 7 2:423–426. Google Scholar

7.

G. E. H. Barrett-Hamilton 1899. Note on the Sicilian dormice of the genera Eliomys and Glis. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 7 3:226–228. Google Scholar

8.

C. Bieber 1995. Dispersal behaviour of the edible dormouse (Myoxus glis L.) in a fragmented landscape in central Germany. Hystrix (N.S.) 6:257–263. Google Scholar

9.

C. Bieber and T. Ruf . 2004. Seasonal timing of reproduction and hibernation in the edible dormouse (Glis glis). Pp. 113–125. in Life in the cold: evolution, mechanisms, adaptation, and application. B. M. Barnes and H. V. Carey . eds. Twelfth International Hibernation Symposium. Biological Papers of the University of Alaska, number 27. Institute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska. Fairbanks. Google Scholar

10.

A. Bitz 1990. Schlafmäuse – Gliridae. Pp. 269–321. in Wierbeltiere: Beiträge zur Fauna von Rheinland-Pfalz. R. Kinzelbach and M. Niehuis . eds. Nainzer Naturwissenschaftliches Archiv, Beiheft 13. Naturhistorisches Museum Mainz. Mainz, Germany. Google Scholar

11.

J. F. Blumenbach 1779. Handbuch der Naturgeschichte. Göttingen. Germany. . Google Scholar

12.

M. J. Brisson 1762. Regnum animale in classes IX distributum, sive synopsis methodica sistens generalem animalium distributionem in classes IX, & duarum primarum classium, quadrupedum scilicet & cetaceorum, particularem divisionem in ordines, sectiones, genera & species. T. Haak. Paris, France. Google Scholar

13.

Gvon Burg 1920. Münstertaler Siebenschläfer. Der Weidmann (Bülach-Zürich) 1920 (52):419. Google Scholar

14.

M. Burgess, P. Morris, and P. Bright . 2003. Population dynamics of the edible dormouse (Glis glis) in England. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 49, supplement 1:27–31. Google Scholar

15.

A. Cabrera 1908. On Muscardinidae from the Iberian Peninsula. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 8 1:188–194. Google Scholar

16.

G. M. Carpaneto and M. Cristaldi . 1995. Dormice and man: a review of past and present relations. Hystrix (N.S.) 6:303–330. Google Scholar

17.

C. Castex, A. Tahri, R. Hoo-Paris, and B. C. Sutter . 1984. Insulin secretion in the hibernating edible dormouse (Glis glis): in vivo and in vitro studies. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, A. Molecular and Integrative Physiology 79:179–183. Google Scholar

18.

E. Castién 2002. Glis glis Linnaeus, 1766, Lirón gris. Pp. 428–431. in Atlas de los mamíferos terrestres de España. L. J. Palomo and J. Gisbert . eds. Dirección General de Conservación de la Naturaleza. Madrid, Spain. Google Scholar

19.

M. V. Civitelli, M. G. Filippucci, C. Kurtonur, and B. Özkan . 1995. Chromosome analysis of three species of Myoxidae. Hystrix (N.S.) 6:117–126. Google Scholar

20.

E. Çolak, N. Yiğit, E. KıvanÇ, and M. Sözen . 1997. Reproductive biology of Glis glis orientalis (Nehring, 1903) (Rodentia: Gliridae) in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Zoology 21:375–380. Google Scholar

21.

G. B. Corbet 1978. The mammals of the Palaearctic region: a taxonomic review. British Museum (Natural History). London, United Kingdom. Google Scholar

22.

M. F. Cuvier 1832. Description des charactères propres aux genres Graphiure et Cercomys de l'ordre des rongeurs. Nouvelles Annales du Muséum d'Histoire Naturelle 1:441–542. + 3 plates. Google Scholar

23.

R. Daams and H. de Bruijn . 1995. A classification of the Gliridae (Rodentia) on the basis of dental morphology. Hystrix (N.S.) 6:3–50. Google Scholar

24.

M. Dimaki 1999. First record of the edible dormouse Glis glis (Linnaeus, 1766) from the Greek island of Andros. Annales Musei Goulandris 10:181–183. Google Scholar

25.

R. Elvert and G. Heldmaier . 2000. Telemetric observation of heart rate, ECG, and body temperature in deep hibernation of edible dormice. Biotelemetry 15:552–559. Google Scholar

26.

R. Elvert and G. Heldmaier . 2005. Cardiorespiratory and metabolic reactions during entrance into torpor in dormice, Glis glis. The Journal of Experimental Biology 208:1373–1383. Google Scholar

27.

J. C. P. Erxleben 1777. Systema regni animalis per classes, ordines, genera, species, varietates, cum synonymia et historia animalium. Classis I. Mammalia. Weygandianis. Lipsiae ( =  Leipzig), Germany. Google Scholar

28.

J. Fietz, M. Pflug, W. Schlund, and F. Tataruch . 2005. Influences of the feeding ecology on body mass and possible implications for reproduction in the edible dormouse (Glis glis). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, B. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 175:45–55. Google Scholar

29.

J. Fietz, W. Schlund, K. H. Dausmann, M. Regelmann, and G. Heldmeier . 2004. Energetic constraints on sexual activity in the male edible dormouse (Glis glis). Oecologia 138:202–209. Google Scholar

30.

M. G. Filippucci and T. Kotsakis . 1995. Biochemical systematics and evolution of Myoxidae. Hystrix (N.S.) 6:77–97. Google Scholar

31.

J. Gaisler, V. Holas, and M. Homolka . 1977. Ecology and reproduction of Gliridae (Mammalia) in northern Moravia. Folia Zoologica 26:213–228. Google Scholar

32.

M. Gębczyński 1981. The oxygen consumption in growing fat dormice, Glis glis. Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 46:289–295. Google Scholar

33.

M. Gębczyński, A. Górecki, and A. Drożdż . 1972. Metabolism, food assimilation and bioenergetics of three species of dormice (Gliridae). Acta Theriologica 17:271–294. Google Scholar

34.

A. Gigirey and J. M. Rey . 1999. Feacal analysis of the edible dormouse (Glis glis) in the northwest Iberian Peninsula. Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 64:376–379. Google Scholar

35.

G. G. Goodwin 1939. Five new rodents from the eastern Elbruz Mountains and a new race of hare from Teheran. American Museum Novitates 1050:1–5. Google Scholar

36.

A. F. Gotch 1995. Latin names explained: a guide to the scientific classification of reptiles, birds & mammals. Blandford. London, United Kingdom. Google Scholar

37.

S. Hillson 1990. Teeth. Cambridge manuals in archaeology. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, United Kingdom. Google Scholar

38.

M. E. Holden 2005. Family Gliridae. Pp. 819–841. in Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. D. E. Wilson and D. M. Reeder . eds. 3rd ed. Johns Hopkins University Press. Baltimore, Maryland. Google Scholar

39.

V. Holišová 1968. Notes on the food of edible dormice (Gliridae). Zoologické Listy 17:109–114. Google Scholar

40.

A. Hoodless and P. A. Morris . 1993. An estimate of population density of the fat dormouse (Glis glis). Journal of Zoology (London) 230:337–340. Google Scholar

41.

A. T. Hopwood 1947. The generic names of the mandrill and baboons, with notes on some of the genera of Brisson, 1762. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 117:533–536. Google Scholar

42.

I. Horáček 1986. Fossil records and chorological status of dormice in Czechoslovakia. Part I.: Glis glis, Eliomys quercinus. Folia Musei Rerum Naturalium Bohemiae Occidentalis, Plzeň, Zoologica 24:49–59. Google Scholar

43.

V. Hrabě 1968. Der mikroskopische Bau der Bulbourethraldrüse bei den Schläfern (Gliridae, Rodentia). Zoologické Listy 17:31–40. Google Scholar

44.

V. Hrabě 1971. Circumanal glands of Central European Gliridae (Rodentia). Zoologické Listy 20:247–258. Google Scholar

45.

H. Hürner, et al 2010. Mitochondrial phylogeography of the edible dormouse (Glis glis) in the western Palearctic region. Journal of Mammalogy 91:233–242. Google Scholar

46.

R. Hutterer and G. Peters . 2001. The vocal repertoire of Graphiurus parvus, and comparisons with other species of dormice. Trakya University Journal of Scientific Research B 2:69–74. Google Scholar

47.

International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature 1956. Opinion 384. Rejection for nomenclatorial purposes of Volume 3 (Zoologie) of the work by Lorenz Oken entitled “Okens Lehrbuch der Naturgeschichte” published in 1815–1816. Opinions and Declarations Rendered by the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature 14:1–42. Google Scholar

48.

International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature 1998. Opinion 1894. Regnum Animale, Ed. 2 (M. J. Brisson, 1762): rejected for nomenclatural purposes, with the conservation of the mammalian generic names Philander (Marsupialia), Pteropus (Chiroptera), Glis, Cuniculus and Hydrochoerus (Rodentia), Meles, Lutra and Hyaena (Carnivora), Tapirus (Perissodactyla), Tragulus and Giraffa (Artiodactyla). Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature 55:64–67. Google Scholar

49.

International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources 2008. The International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Red list of threatened species.  www.iucnredlist.org, accessed 20 March 2008.  Google Scholar

50.

V. A. Ivashkina 2006. Abundance and activity of the edible dormouse (Glis glis L.) in the Zhiguli Mountains (Russia, middle Volga region). Polish Journal of Ecology 54:337–344. Google Scholar

51.

J. E. Jackson 1994. The edible or fat dormouse (Glis glis) in Britain. Quarterly Journal of Forestry 88:119–125. Google Scholar

52.

M. Jallageas and I. Assenmacher . 1984. External factors controlling annual testosterone and thyroxine cycles in the edible dormouse Glis glis. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, A. Molecular and Integrative Physiology 77:161–167. Google Scholar

53.

M. Jallageas, N. Mas, and J. Nouguier-Soulé . 1991. Control of annual endocrine rhythms in the edible dormouse: nonprimary effect of photoperiod. Journal of Biological Rhythms 6:343–352. Google Scholar

54.

L. M. Jones-Walters and G. B. Corbet . 1991. Genus Glis. Pp. 264–267. in The handbook of British mammals. G. B. Corbet and S. Harris . eds. 3rd ed. Blackwell Scientific Publishers. Oxford, United Kingdom. Google Scholar

55.

J. E. Joy 1981. Persistence of infradian body weight cycles in castrated dormice (Glis glis). Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 37:837–839. Google Scholar

56.

J. E. Joy, R. B. Melnyk, and N. Mrosovsky . 1980. Reproductive cycles in the male dormouse (Glis glis). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, A. Molecular and Integrative Physiology 67:219–221. Google Scholar

57.

M. Jurczyszyn 1995. Population density of Myoxus glis (L.) in some forest biotopes. Hystrix (N.S.) 6:265–271. Google Scholar

58.

M. Jurczyszyn 2001. Reintroduction of the edible dormouse (Glis glis) in Sierakowski Landscape Park (Poland). Preliminary results. Trakya University Journal of Scientific Research B 2:111–114. Google Scholar

59.

M. Jurczyszyn 2006. The use of space by translocated edible dormice Glis glis (L.), at the site of their original capture and the site of their release: radio tracking method applied in a reintroduction experiment. Polish Journal of Ecology 54:345–350. Google Scholar

60.

M. Jurczyszyn 2007. Hibernation cavities used by the edible dormouse, Glis glis (Gliridae, Rodentia). Folia Zoologica 56:162–168. Google Scholar

61.

M. Jurczyszyn and E. Zgrabczyńska . 2007. Influence of population density and reproduction on space use and spatial relations in the edible dormouse. Acta Theriologica 52:181–188. Google Scholar

62.

R. Juškaitis 1995. Distribution, abundance and conservation status of dormice (Myoxidae) in Lithuania. Hystrix (N.S.) 6:181–184. Google Scholar

63.

R. Juškaitis 2006. Interactions between dormice (Gliridae) and hole-nesting birds in nestboxes. Folia Zoologica 55:225–236. Google Scholar

64.

R. Juškaitis and V. Šiožinytė . 2008. Habitat requirements of the commom dormouse (Muscardinus avellanarius) and the fat dormouse (Glis glis) in mature mixed forest in Lithuania. Ekológia (Bratislava) 27:143–151. Google Scholar

65.

N. Yu Kirillova, A. A. Kirillov, and V. A. Ivashkina . 2006. Ectoparasites of the edible dormouse Glis glis L. of Samarskaya Luka peninsula (Russia). Polish Journal of Ecology 54:387–390. Google Scholar

66.

L. Koenig 1960. Das Aktionssystem des Siebenschläfers. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 17:427–505. Google Scholar

67.

B. Koppmann-Rumpf, C. Heberer, and K-H. Schmidt . 2003. Long term study of the reaction of the edible dormouse Glis glis (Rodentia: Gliridae) to climatic changes and its interactions with hole-breeding passerines. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientarum Hungaricae, supplement 1 49:69–76. Google Scholar

68.

K. Kowalski 2001. Pleistocene rodents of Europe. Folia Quaternaria 72:3–389. Google Scholar

69.

J. Kratochvíl 1973. Mänliche Sexualorgane und System der Gliridae (Rodentia). Acta Scientarum Naturalium Academiae Scientarum Bohemoslovace Brno 7 (12):1–52. Google Scholar

70.

B. Kryštufek 1999. Glis glis (Linnaeus, 1766). Pp. 294–295. in Atlas of European mammals. A. J. Mitchell-Jones, et al eds. T & A D Poyser Natural History. London, United Kingdom. Google Scholar

71.

B. Kryštufek 2001. Compartmentalisation of the body of a fat dormouse Glis glis. Trakya University Journal of Scientific Research B 2:95–106. Google Scholar

72.

B. Kryštufek 2004. Nipples in the edible dormouse Glis glis. Folia Zoologica 53:107–111. Google Scholar

73.

B. Kryštufek 2007. [Edible dormouse—characteristics and life]. Pp. 43–89. in [Dormouse and man]. B. Kryštufek and B. Flajšman . eds. Ekološki forum LDS. Ljubljana, Slovenia. (in Slovene).  Google Scholar

74.

B. Kryštufek and W. Haberl . 2001. Dormouse associations in Slovenia – a new approach to an old tradition. Trakya University Journal of Scientific Research B 2:171–177. Google Scholar

75.

B. Kryštufek, A. Hudoklin, and D. Pavlin . 2003. Population biology of the edible dormouse Glis glis in a mixed montane forest in central Slovenia over three years. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientarum Hungaricae, supplement 1 49:85–97. Google Scholar

76.

B. Kryštufek, M. Pistotnik, and K. Sedmak Časar . 2005. Age determination and age structure in the edible dormouse Glis glis based on incremental bone lines. Mammal Review 35:210–214. Google Scholar

77.

B. Kryštufek and V. Vohralík . 2005. Mammals of Turkey and Cyprus. Rodentia I: Sciuridae, Dipodidae, Gliridae, Arvicolinae. Univerza na Primorskem, Znanstveno-raziskovalno Središče. Koper, Slovenia. Google Scholar

78.

B. Kryštufek and M. Zavodnik . 2003. Autumn population density of the edible dormouse (Glis glis) in the mixed montane forest of central Slovenia over 33 years. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientarum Hungaricae, supplement 1 49:99–108. Google Scholar

79.

D. M. Lay 1967. A study of the mammals of Iran resulting from the Street expedition of 1962–63. Fieldiana: Zoology 54:191–194. Google Scholar

80.

G. I. Likhachev 1972. The distribution of dormice in the European part of the USSR. Fauna i Ekologiya Gryzunov 11:71–115. (in Russian with English summary).  Google Scholar

81.

C. Linnaeus 1766. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis synonymis, locis. Vol. 1. Laurentii Salvii. Holmiae ( =  Stockholm), Sweden. Google Scholar

82.

G. Marin and A. Pilastro . 1994. Communally breeding dormice, Glis glis, are close kin. Animal Behaviour 47:1485–1487. Google Scholar

83.

G. G. Markov 2001. Microgeographical non-metrical cranial diversity of the fat dormouse (Glis glis). Trakya University Journal of Scientific Research B 2:115–119. Google Scholar

84.

A. K. Markova 2000. The Mikulino ( =  Eemian) mammal faunas of the Russian Plain and Crimea. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 79:293–301. Google Scholar

85.

V. E. Martino 1930. Notes on the ecology of some mammals from Jugoslavia. Zapiski Russkago Nauchnago Instituta v Byelgrade 2:53–65. Google Scholar

86.

V. E. Martino and E. V. Martino . 1941. Material for the ecology and classification of the great dormouse (Glis). Zapiski Russkogo Nauchnago Instituta v Belgrade 17:1–10. Google Scholar

87.

L. Maul 1990. Überblick über die unterpleistozänen Kleinsäugerfaunen Europas. Quartärpaläontologie 8:153–191. Google Scholar

88.

A. Milazzo, W. Falletta, and M. Sará . 2003. Habitat selection of fat dormouse (Glis glis italicus) in deciduous woodlands of Sicily. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientarum Hungaricae, Supplement 1 49:117–124. Google Scholar

89.

G. S. Miller 1912. Catalogue of the mammals of Western Europe (Europe exclusive of Russia) in the collection of the British Museum. British Museum (Natural History). London, United Kingdom. Google Scholar

90.

D. Mirić 1960. Verzeichnis von Säugetiere Jugoslawiens, die nich in der “Checklist of Palaearctic and Indian Mammals” von Ellerman & Morrison-Scott (1951) enhalten sind. Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 25:35–46. Google Scholar

91.

I. G. S. Montagu 1923. On some mammals from Jugoslavia. Proceedings of the General Meetings for Scientific Business of the Zoological Society of London 57:865–870. Google Scholar

92.

P. Morris 1997. A review of the fat dormouse (Glis glis) in Britain. Natura Croatica 6:163–176. Google Scholar

93.

P. Morris 2004. Dormice. Whittet Books Ltd. Suffolk, United Kingdom. Google Scholar

94.

P. A. Morris and A. Hoodless . 1992. Movements and hibernaculum site in the fat dormouse (Glis glis). Journal of Zoology (London) 228:685–687. Google Scholar

95.

N. Mrosovsky, R. B. Melnyk, K. Lang, J. D. Hallonquist, M. Boshes, and J. E. Joy . 1980. Infradian cycles in dormice (Glis glis). Journal of Comparative Physiology, A. Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology 137:315–339. Google Scholar

96.

A. Nehring 1903. Über Myoxus glis orientalis, n. subsp., und Muscardinus avellanarius aus Kleinasien. Zoologischer Anzeiger 26:533–534. Google Scholar

97.

S. I. Ognev 1947. Zveri SSSR I prilezhashchikh stran. Gryzuny (prodolzhenie). (Zveri vostochnoi Evropy i severnoi Azii) [Mammals of the USSR and adjacent countries: Rodents (continued). (Mammals of eastern Europe and northern Azii)]. Akademiya Nauk SSSR 5:1–809. (in Russian).  Google Scholar

98.

S. I. Ognev 1963. Mammals of the E.S.S.R. and adjacent countries. Mammals of Eastern Europe and northern Asia. Vol. V. Rodents. Israel Program for Scientific Translations. Jerusalem, Israel. Google Scholar

99.

L. Oken 1816. Okens Lehrbuch der Naturgescichte. Vol. 3. Zoologie. E. H. Reclam. Leipzig, Germany. Google Scholar

100.

J. C. Ondrias 1966. The taxonomy and geographical distribution of the rodents of Greece. Säugetierkundliche Mitteilungen 14:1–136. Google Scholar

101.

R. Owen 1840. Odontography; or, a treatise on the comparative anatomy of the teeth; their physiological relations, mode of development, and microscopic structure, in the vertebrate animals. Vol. II. Atlas Hippolyte Bailliere. London, United Kingdom. Google Scholar

102.

B. Özkan 2006. An observation on the reproductive biology of Glis glis (Linnaeus, 1766) (Rodentia; Gliridae) and body weight gaining of pups in the Istranca Mountains of Turkish Thrace. International Journal of Zoological Research 2:129–135. Google Scholar

103.

B. M. Petrov 1992. Mammals of Yugoslavia: insectivores and rodents. Natural History Museum in Belgrade 37:1–186. Google Scholar

104.

A. Pilastro 1992. Communal nesting between breeding females in a free-living population of fat dormouse (Glis glis L.). Bolletino di Zoologia 59:63–68. Google Scholar

105.

A. Pilastro, G. Tavecchia, and G. Marin . 2003. Long living and reproduction skipping in the fat dormouse. Ecology 84:1784–1792. Google Scholar

106.

V. Pilāts 1995. Dormice—their present status in Latvia. Hystrix (N.S.) 6:185–194. Google Scholar

107.

S. Polak 1997. The use of caves by the edible dormouse (Myoxus glis) in the Slovenian Karst. Natura Croatica 6:313–321. Google Scholar

108.

E. G. Potapova 2001. Morphological patterns and evolutionary pathways of the middle ear in dormice (Gliridae, Rodentia). Trakya University Journal of Scientific Research B 2:159–170. Google Scholar

109.

K. Prosenc, T. Avšič-Županc, T. Trilar, M. Petrovec, and M. Poljak . 1997. The fat dormouse Myoxus glis as a natural host of medically important microorganisms. Natura Croatica 6:252–262. . Google Scholar

110.

A. B. Reichenbach 1835. Bildergalerie der Thierwelt odr Abbildungen des Interessantesten aus dem Thierreiche mit ausführlicher Beschreibung von A.B. Reichenbach. Ponicke. Leipzig, Germany. Google Scholar

111.

A. Reyes, G. Pesole, and C. Saccone . 1998. Complete mitochondrial DNA sequence of the fat dormouse, Glis glis: further evidence for rodent paraphyly. Molecular Biology and Evolution 15:499–505. Google Scholar

112.

G. Rodolfi 1994. Dormice Glis glis activity and hazelnut consumption. Acta Theriologica 39:215–220. Google Scholar

113.

O. L. Rossolimo, E. G. Potapova, I. Ya Pavlinov, S. V. Kruskop, and O. V. Voltzit . 2001. Dormice (Myoxidae) of the world. Archives of the Zoological Museum of the Moscow State University 42:1–232. (in Russian with English abstract).  Google Scholar

114.

T. Ruf, J. Fietz, W. Schlund, and C. Bieber . 2006. High survival in poor years: life history tactics adapted to mast seeding in the edible dormouse. Ecology 87:372–381. Google Scholar

115.

L. Santini 1993. Glirids as pests of agriculture and forestry production. P. in Abstracts of the II Conference on Dormice (Rodentia, Gliridae), Fuscaldo, Italy.  Google Scholar

116.

M. Sara and G. Casamento . 1995. Distribution and ecology of dormice (Myoxidae) in Sicily: a preliminary account. Hystrix (N.S.) 6:161–168. Google Scholar

117.

K. A. Satunin 1905. Obzor' mlekopitaiuschikh' Zakaspiiskoi oblasti (Survey of mammals of the Transcaspian Region). Vol. 25. Rasporiaditel'nyi Komitet Kavkazskago Otd'lala Imperatorskoskago Russkago Geograficheskago Obschestva. Tiflis, Russia. (in Russian).  Google Scholar

118.

K. A. Satunin 1905–1906. Neue und wenig bekannte Säugetiere aus dem Kaukasus und aus Transkapien. Mitteilungen des Kaukasischen Museums 2:45–69. (in Russian and German).  Google Scholar

119.

K. A. Satunin 1920. Mammalia Caucasica. Vol. 2. Travaux du Museum de Georgie. Tiflis, Russia. (in Russian).  Google Scholar

120.

D. Scaravelli and G. Aloise . 1995. Predation on dormice in Italy. Hystrix (N.S.) 6:245–255. Google Scholar

121.

W. Schlund and F. Scharfe . 1997. Unterschiede zweier Siebenschläfer-Populationen (Myoxus glis L.) im Scönbuch in Abhängigkeit des Lebensraum. Veröffentlichungen für Naturschutz und Landschaftspflege in Baden-Württemberg 71–72:459–484. Google Scholar

122.

E. Schulze 1900. Catalogus mammalium europaeorum. Zeitschrift für Naturwissenschaften 73:187–224. Google Scholar

123.

M. Ściński and Z. Borowski . 2008. Spatial organization of the fat dormouse (Glis glis) in an oak–hornbeam forest during the mating and post-mating season. Mammalian Biology 73:119–127. Google Scholar

124.

M. V. Shidlovskyi 1962. [Key to the rodents of Transcaucasia.] Mechniereba. Tbilisi, USSR. (in Russian).  Google Scholar

125.

V. E. Sokolov and V. F. Kulikov . 1987. The structure and function of the vibrissal apparatus in some rodents. Mammalia 51:125–138. Google Scholar

126.

F. Spitzenberger 2001. Die Säugetierfauna Österreichs. Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wassertwirtschaft. Graz, Austria. Google Scholar

127.

G. Storch 1978. Glis glis (Linnaeus, 1766)—Siebenschläfer. Pp. 243–258. in Handbuch der Säugetiere Europas. Bd. 1, Rodentia 1. J. Niethammer and F. Krapp . eds. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft. Wiesbaden, Germany. Google Scholar

128.

G. Storch 1995. Affinities among living dormouse genera. Hystrix (N.S.) 6:51–62. Google Scholar

129.

B. J. Teerink 1991. Hair of West-European mammals. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, United Kingdom. Google Scholar

130.

O. Thomas 1906. Three new Palaearctic mammals. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 7 18:220–222. Google Scholar

131.

O. Thomas 1907. On the occurrence of the edible dormouse (genus Glis) in Sardinia. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 7 19:444–445. Google Scholar

132.

N. Turk, et al 2008. The role of fat dormouse (Glis glis L.) as reservoir host for spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in the region of Gorski Kotar, Croatia. European Journal of Wildlife Research 54:117–121. Google Scholar

133.

N. Tvrtković, B. Dulić, and M. Grubešić . 1995. Distribution and habitats of dormice in Croatia. Hystrix (N.S.) 6:199–207. Google Scholar

134.

P. Valdis 2003. The fat dormouse (Glis glis) in Gauja National Park—the most northern locality within the species' distribution range? Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientarum Hungaricae, supplement 1 49:131–137. Google Scholar

135.

A. Frhr V. Vietinghoff-Riesch 1960. Der Siebenschläfers (Glis glis L.). Monographien der Wildsäugetiere 14. VEB Gustav Fischer Verlag. Jena, Germany. Google Scholar

136.

C. Violani and B. Zava . 1995. Carolus Linnaeus and the edible dormouse. Hystrix (N.S.) 6:109–115. Google Scholar

137.

P. Vogel 1997. Hibernation of recently captured Muscardinus, Eliomys and Myoxus: a comparative study. Natura Croatica 6:217–231. Google Scholar

138.

J. H. Wahlert, S. L. Sawitzke, and M. E. Holden . 1993. Cranial anatomy and relationships of dormice (Rodentia, Myoxidae). American Museum Novitates 306:1–32. Google Scholar

139.

M. Wilz and G. Heldmaier . 2000. Comparison of hibernation, estivation and daily torpor in the edible dormouse, Glis glis. Journal of Comparative Physiology, B. Biochemical, Systematic, and Environmental Physiology 170:511–521. Google Scholar

140.

M. Wilz, W. K. Milsom, and G. Heldmaier . 2000. Intermittent ventilation in hibernating dormice—is ventilation always necessary to meet metabolic demands? Pp. 169–178. in Life in the cold. Eleventh International Hibernation Symposium. G. Heldmaier and M. Klingenspor . eds. Springer. Berlin, Germany. Google Scholar

141.

N. Yiğit, E. Çolak, M. Sözen, and Ş Özkurt . 2001. Observations on the feeding biology and behaviour of the fat dormouse, Glis glis orientalis Nehring, 1903 (Mammalia: Rodentia) in captivity. Zoology in the Middle East 22:17–24. Google Scholar

142.

E. A. W. Zimmermann 1780. Geographische Geschichte des Menschen, und der vierfüssigen Thiere. Vol. 2. Enthält ein vollständiges Verzeichniss aller bekannten Quadrupeden. Weyganschen Buchhandlung. Leipzig, Germany. Google Scholar

143.

K. Zimmermann 1953. Die Waldsäuger von Kreta. 4. Die Rodentia Kreats. Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 17:21–51. Google Scholar

Notes

[1] Associate editors of this account were Jamie M. Harris and Pamela Owen. Paula Jenkins and Igor Pavlinov reviewed the synonymies. Editor was Meredith J. Hamilton.

Boris Kryštufek "Glis glis (Rodentia: Gliridae)," Mammalian Species 42(1), 195-206, (24 September 2010). https://doi.org/10.1644/865.1
Published: 24 September 2010
JOURNAL ARTICLE
12 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top